YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Taking pay TV channels OTT direct - nscreenmedia.com

Taking Pay TV Channels OTT Direct: Four Reasons to Launch Standalone Service Now | Page 1

I N T R O D U C T I O N

In the last few months the unthinkable has

happened. A cable TV channel, one that has been

with pay television from the beginning, one widely

held as an anchor tenant of the franchise, has

decided to launch a standalone OTT service. HBO

will begin signing up Internet customers in 2015

without requiring that they have a pay TV

subscription.

The move by HBO has been greeted with raised

eyebrows by some in the industry. NBC Universal

head Steve Burke said of the HBO move that “it’s

going to be a challenge for them to not cannibalize

what is already a really, really good business.”1

Despite the cautious industry reception to HBO’s

announcement, others have decided to follow the

lead. CBS launched a $5.99 per month OTT

subscription service called CBS All Access. And

Showtime has said it will also launch direct to

consumer Internet service in 2015.2

Others have decided to keep their content safely

ensconced behind the pay TV wall. Chase Carey,

COO of Fox, said the company has no imminent

plans to offer its own content direct to consumers

over the Internet.

What could be inducing cable stalwarts to

potentially put the billions of dollars they earn

from pay TV at risk by going direct to consumers

OTT? This paper offers four solid reasons why

they are taking the risk.

Taken together, these four reasons explain why

any cable TV channel can, and should, launch their

own OTT TV service now.

Though it may be challenging to avoid

cannibalization of pay TV revenue streams, it is

not impossible and may lead to growth in both

viewers and revenue.

Ta k i n g pay T V c ha n n e l s OT T d i re ct : F o u r r e a s o n s t o l a u n c h s t a n d a l o n e s e r v i c e n o w

Author: Colin Dixon, Founder and Chief Analyst, nScreenMedia | Date: December 4, 2014

This paper presents four reasons that

explain why any cable TV channel

can, and should, launch their own

OTT TV service now.

This paper was made possible by the

generous sponsorship of

www.schange.com

Page 2: Taking pay TV channels OTT direct - nscreenmedia.com

Taking Pay TV Channels OTT Direct: Four Reasons to Launch Standalone Service Now | Page 2

R E A S O N 1 : I T ’ S A L L A B O U T D A T A

“ Standard

products to passive

recipients”

Richard Quest, CNN

International News

Anchor, describing

traditional media today

Discussion

Richard Quest, the CNN International News Anchor, described the predominant model of media delivery

today as “standard products to passive recipients.”3 It is becoming increasingly clear that the key to success

in an IP world is anything but standard and passive.

Inside the pay TV bundle, neither HBO nor CBS gets much data on how the content is consumed by viewers.

Lack of viewer data limits their ability to tailor the experience to each individual. Yet that is precisely what

an increasing number of viewers are coming to expect. By tracking how, when and where viewers are

watching content, HBO and CBS will be able to create an experience closely attuned to the needs of

customers.

This data will inform every part of their business. For example, Netflix uses its extensive user data to figure

out what type of content to create, and even the impact of a new show on subscriptions.

Internet natives already know this and are riding the data to huge viewership. Michelle Phan, the YouTube

make-up queen, interacts with her audience constantly through social media. She uses this interaction to

find out what her audience wants her to cover and creates content to fit. And it works. Her YouTube

channel has 6.4 million subscribers, driving 18 million monthly views and 2.8 million average views per

video.4

HBO and CBS need the audience data to commission content much more accurately targeted to their

audience. In the case of CBS, this also allows for more accurate targeting of advertising. And better targeted

ads are more likely to be watched by viewers and, as a result, are more valuable.

There is already ample evidence in the market that viewers are increasingly comfortable with being more

actively involved with what they watch. Ericsson forecasts that by 2020, 50% or more of what people

watch will be on-demand. In some market segments we may already be passed that point.5

Mr. Quest is exactly right in his characterization of old media as standard products to passive recipients.

Audiences are becoming increasingly active in their viewing. If content providers stick to their mass-

market standard product ways they will find themselves relegated to the sidelines by content companies

that leverage the full power of the user data they obtain from their OTT services.

Page 3: Taking pay TV channels OTT direct - nscreenmedia.com

Taking Pay TV Channels OTT Direct: Four Reasons to Launch Standalone Service Now | Page 3

R E A S O N 2 : G O F O R I N C R E M E N T A L R E V E N U E

“All in, there are 80

million homes that do not

have HBO and we will use

all means at our disposal

to go after them.”

Richard Plepler, CEO, HBO

Discussion

HBO growth inside the pay TV package is stalled. Every pay TV subscriber that wants HBO under the current

business terms has it. Numerous marketing approaches have been tried, from free weekends to broadband

bundles, yet the company simply can’t push much beyond the 30M subscribers it currently has. Further, the

company has seen Netflix blow passed this number of subscribers in the last year, with no signs that things

are going to slow down.

The company is clearly aware it needs to do something new to ignite growth. Mr. Plepler (HBO’s head) said:

“All in, there are 80 million homes that do not have HBO and we will use all means at our disposal to go after

them.”6 This is why the company decided to go direct to consumers in 2015.

Going direct over the Internet for traditional media companies is certainly nothing new. Sky, the UK satellite

company, decided to take the same approach in 2011 with its OTT standalone product Now TV. UK

consumers can buy access to all 7 Sky Sports channels for £6.99 a day or subscribe to a movie package on

monthly basis for £14.99. This approach appears to be working with company officials crediting Now TV with

helping lift subscriptions 70,000 in the first quarter of 2014.7

Sky’s Now TV offers

premium sports a la carte

to Internet users

Page 4: Taking pay TV channels OTT direct - nscreenmedia.com

Taking Pay TV Channels OTT Direct: Four Reasons to Launch Standalone Service Now | Page 4

R E A S O N 3 : B E R E A D Y T O “ F L I P T H E S W I T C H ”

“ We’re well-

positioned to go direct

to the consumer if the

marketplace demands

it, but we don’t feel a

need to do that now.”

Bob Iger, Chariman and CEO, Disney

Discussion

While no one wants to rock the pay TV boat, it’s also becoming clear consumers are increasingly enamored

with the web approach to media. If a large number of pay TV subscribers were to decide to disconnect pay

TV, it just makes good sense to be ready to react. As Bob Iger said: “We’re well-positioned to go direct to

the consumer if the marketplace demands it, but we don’t feel a need to do that now.”8

Is this likely to happen soon? Apparently not. The number of US pay TV subscribers has been static at a

little over 100 million for the last 5 years. However, there are some worrying signs for the future. The

young do not seem to have the same affinity for traditional TV as older age groups.

Millennials put considerably less stock by pay TV than the rest of the population. Just 63% of 18-29 year

olds with broadband report also have pay TV.9 That is 11% below the average ownership and 14% lower

than the 30-49 year olds. This substantial difference is probably due to the 19% that have never subscribed

to the service, since cancellation rates amongst millennials are identical to the 30-49 year olds.10 And it is

with the 19% that have never subscribed to service that operators have the biggest challenge. Just 2% of

that group say they are considering subscribing in the next three months.11

Simply put, there is no better way to be ready for a mass migration away from pay TV than to have a

standalone OTT service already in market.

74%

63%

77%

78%

16%

18%

18%

14%

10%

19%

5%

8%

Average

Millennials

30-49

50+

Pay-TV Subscription Status by Age Group

Current subscriber Cancelled service Never subscribed

© nScreenMedia, 2014

(n=1000)

(n=364)

(n=389)

(n=247)

Page 5: Taking pay TV channels OTT direct - nscreenmedia.com

Taking Pay TV Channels OTT Direct: Four Reasons to Launch Standalone Service Now | Page 5

R E A S O N 4 : L O O K F O R N E W O N L I N E O P P O R T U N I T I E S

“ There are 10 million

homes that have

broadband only. They

don’t have cable, they

don’t have satellite. But

they do want CBS

content.”

Les Moonves, President and CEO, CBS Corp.

Discussion

The web is already bringing disruption to some areas that have traditionally been pay TV strongholds.

With disruption, comes opportunity. That is what Disney’s purchase of Maker Studios is all about, and what

CBS is up to pitching CBSN into the volatile world of online news. As Les Moonves, CBS President and CEO,

said: “There are 10 million homes that have broadband only. They don’t have cable, they don’t have

satellite. But they do want CBS content.”

Mr. Moonves has set his sights on one of the fastest growing new audiences in media today: the large and

growing community of people that rely on a variety of non-pay TV sources for their entertainment. Since

2010 this group has steadily increased, from 17.8 million US households to 22.6 million in 2014. Over half

of these homes have access to video over broadband. According to Parks Associates, there are 94.5 million

broadband homes in the US today and 14% (or 13.2 million) do not have pay television.12

CBSN could be a great product for those broadband only homes. It is also a great way of leveraging CBS’s

extensive news infrastructure in a new way that doesn’t compete with other CBS properties. For existing

pay TV channels, a careful look at existing assets could uncover new opportunities for them online.

96.9 99.4 100.1 100.4 100.4 100.9 100.7

19.9 17.8 17.4 19.6 20.7 21.6 22.6

2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4

US HOUSEHOLDS WITH AND WITHOUT PAY TV - 2008 TO 2014

Pay TV HHs Non-Pay-TV HHs© nScreenMedia, 2014

Page 6: Taking pay TV channels OTT direct - nscreenmedia.com

Taking Pay TV Channels OTT Direct: Four Reasons to Launch Standalone Service Now | Page 6

C O N C L U S I O N

Just by being present online with content that is

traditionally only available in pay TV does

increase the possibility that cord cutting could

catch fire. And this, in turn, does put at risk pay TV

revenues. However, this paper illustrates that

there are also risks in not launching OTT direct to

consumers!

For many the potential for additional revenue and

the opportunity to future-proof content value will

be worth the risk of launching outside the pay TV

bundle.

And by working closely with service operators,

content providers can minimize the risk of over-

turning the pay TV apple cart.

References

1 Shalini Ramachandran and Amol Sharma, “Comcast Dubious About HBO’s Web Video”, The Wall Street Journal, October 23, 2014

2 Colin Dixon, “CandW Discuss TV ads, CBS OTT ad-support live TV News”, nScreenMedia, November 6 2014 3 Richard Quest speaking at the Ericsson Media Summit, NYC, October 29 2014 4 Case Study, “YouTube Creator Stories: How Michelle Phan Became Everyone’s Beauty Bestie”, think with

Google, May 2014, https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/case-studies/michelle-phan.html (accessed on 11/25/14)

5 Simon Frost, Head of TV Marketing, Ericsson, speaking at the Ericsson Media Summit, October 29 2014 6 Ryan Waniata, “HBO breaks free of cable, will offer online-only subscriptions in 2015”, Digital Trends, October

15 2014, http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/hbo-go-break-free-cable-chains-2015/ (accessed on 11/26/14)

7 Mark Seney, “BSkyB’s TV customers rise by 74,000, but broadband growth slows”, The Guardian, May 1 2014, http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/may/01/bskyb-tv-broadband-now-tv (accessed on 11/26/11)

8 Marc Graser, Disney Downplays a la Carte Plans as ESPN Preps OTT Services”, Variety, November 6 2014, http://variety.com/2014/digital/news/disney-downplays-a-la-carte-plans-as-espn-preps-ott-services-1201350086/ (accessed on 11/26/14)

9 Colin Dixon, View My Video: Consumer Digital Media Consumption, nScreenMedia, Q2 2014 10 Colin Dixon, ibid. 11 MarketingCharts staff, Pay-TV Subscription Trends Among Millennials, marketingcharts.com, April 8, 2014,

www.marketingcharts.com/wp/television/pay-tv-subscription-trends-among-millennials-41842 (accessed on 7/8/14)

12 Brett Sappington, “Under Attack: Assessing New Threats to Pay TV”, Parks Associates, Q4 2014, http://www.parksassociates.com/report/pay-tv-under-attack (accessed on 11/26/14)

www.nScreenMedia.com

For more information contact:

[email protected]

This paper was made possible by the

generous sponsorship of

www.schange.com

“Many will find the potential for

additional revenue and the opportunity to

future-proof content value worth the risk of

launching outside the pay TV bundle.”

Colin Dixon

Founder and Chief Analyst, nScreenMedia


Related Documents