LETTER OF SUBMITTAL
I-495 NORTHERN SECTION
SHOULDER USEState Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501
Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094)Contract ID No.: C00105130DB72
Submitted by:
March 14, 2014
Submitted for:
ORIGINAL
ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
1 of 3
Offerors shall furnish a copy of this Letter of Submittal Checklist, with the page references added, with the Letter of Submittal.
Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference
Page Reference
Letter of Submittal Checklist and Contents Attachment 4.0.1.1 Section 4.0.1.1 Appendix
Attachment 4.0.1.1
Acknowledgement of RFP, Revisions, and/or Addenda Attachment 3.4 (Form C-78-RFP) Sections 3.4; 4.0.1.1
Appendix Attachment
3.4
Letter of Submittal NA Sections 4.1 1
Letter of Submittal on Offeror’s letterhead NA Section 4.1.1 1
Offeror’s full legal name and address NA Section 4.1.1 1
Authorized representative’s original signature NA Section 4.1.1 3
Declaration of intent NA Section 4.1.2 1
120 day declaration NA Section 4.1.3 1
Point of Contact information NA Section 4.1.4 2
Principal Officer information NA Section 4.1.5 2
Offeror’s Corporate Structure NA Section 4.1.6 2
Full Legal Name of Lead Contractor and Lead Designer NA Section 4.1.7 2
Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.1.8 2
DBE statement confirming Offeror is committed to achieving the required DBE goal NA Section 4.1.9 2
ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
2 of 3
Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference
Page Reference
Interim and Final Completion Date(s) NA Section 4.1.10 2
Attachments to the Letter of Submittal NA Section 4.2 Appendix
Attachment 4.2
Affiliated and/ or Subsidiary Companies Attachment 4.2.1 Section 4.2.1 Appendix
Attachment
4.2.1
Certification Regarding Debarment Forms Attachment 4.2.2(a)
Attachment 4.2.2(b) Section 4.2.2
Appendix Attachment
4.2.2(a)
& 4.2.2(b)
Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.2.3 Appendix
Attachment 4.2.3
Evidence of obtaining bonding NA Section 4.2.4 Appendix
Attachment
4.2.4
Full size copies of DPOR licenses and SCC registrations NA Section 4.2.5 Appendix
Attachment
4.2.5
SCC registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.1 Appendix
Attachment
4.2.5.1
ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
3 of 3
Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference
Page Reference
DPOR registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.2 Appendix
Attachment 4.2.5.2
Lead Contractor Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(a) Section 4.2.6
Appendix Attachment
4.2.6(a)
Lead Designer Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(b) Section 4.2.6
Appendix Attachment
4.2.6(b)
Conceptual Roadway Plans NA Section 4.2.7
Appendix Attachment
4.2.7
Offerers Technical Proposal Compliance NA Section 4.2.8
Appendix Attachment
4.2.8
4.1 Letter of Su
bm
ittal
4.2 Attach
men
ts to the L
etter of Sub
mittal
Attachment 4.2.1Affiliated and Subsidiary Companies of the Offeror
1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 4.2.1
State Project No. (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501
Affilia t e d a nd S ubs idia r y C ompanie s o f T he Lane Construction Corporation
Offerors shall complete the table and include the addresses of affiliates or subsidiary companies as applicable. By completing this table, Offerors certify that all affiliated and subsidiary companies of the Offeror are listed.
The Offeror does not have any affiliated or subsidiary companies.
X Affiliated and/ or subsidiary companies of The Lane Construction Corporation are listed below.
Relationship with Offeror (Affiliate or Subsidiary)
Full Legal Name Address
PARENT COMPANY Lane Industries Incorporated 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire CT 06410
AFFILIATE Lane Worldwide Infrastructure, Inc. 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire CT 06410
AFFILIATE Lane Infrastructure. Inc. 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410
AFFILIATE Lane International, B.V. Prins Bernhardplein 200 1097 JB Amsterdam The Netherlands
AFFILIATE Lane Mideast Contracting, LLC P.O. Box 35243 Abu Dhabi, UAE Makeen Tower Corner of 9th and 10th Streets
AFFILIATE Lane Mideast, Qatar, LLC Grand Hamad Street Bin Al Sheikh Bldg. 3rd Floor Doha, Qatar
SUBSIDIARY Lanecon Corporation 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410
JOINT VENTURE (51% PARTNER)
Virginia Guardrail Partners 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410
2 of 2
JOINT VENTURE
(35% PARTNER) Fluor-Lane 95, LLC 6700 Las Colinas Blvd.
Irving, TX 75039
JOINT VENTURE
(20% PARTNER) AGL Constructors
729 West Adams Street Chicago, IL 60607
JOINT VENTURE
(25% PARTNER) Gemma-Lane Liberty Partners 769 Hebron Avenue
Glastonbury, CT 06033
JOINT VENTURE
(25% PARTNER) Gemma-Lane Patriot Partners 769 Hebron Avenue
Glastonbury, CT 06033
Attachment 4.2.2(a)Certification Regarding Debarment Forms
Primary Covered Transactions
Attachment 4.2.2(b)Certification Regarding Debarment Forms
Lower Tier Covered Transactions
Attachment 4.2.3VDOT Prequalification Supporting Documentation
TRNSPORT - E22 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 02/14/2014 LSPPREQ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2:02 PM PREQUALIFIED VENDORS SORTED BY VENDOR NAME PAGE 254 THIS LIST INCLUDES ALL PREQUALIFIED LEVELS AS OF 02/14/2014 - L -
L002 THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION PREQ. EXP : 06/30/2014
--PREQ ADDRESS ------------------ WORK CLASSES (LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO) 90 FIELDSTONE COURT 002 - GRADING CHESHIRE, CT 06410-1212 003 - MAJOR STRUCTURES PHONE : 203-235-3351 004 - ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING FAX : 203-237-4260 006 - PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING 007 - MINOR STRUCTURES 045 - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
BUSINESS CONTACT: CAIOLA, VINCENT JAMES EMAIL: [email protected] ------DBE INFORMATION------
DBE TYPE : N/A DBE CONTACT: N/A ===============================================================================
Attachment 4.2.4Surety Letter
Zurich American Insurance Company
Fidelity and Deposit Company of MurylundLiberty Mutual Insurance Compuny
l,llarch 7 , 2014
Virginia Department of Transportation
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, VA23219
RE: The Lane Construction Corporation
Request for Proposals
l-495 Shoulder-North Section (UPC 105130)
Project No.; (FO)0495-029-123, P10'1, C50{ / Contract lD No. C00105130D872
Estimated Value of Project: $20,000,000.00 - $30,000,000.00
To Whom lt May Concern:
This letter will serve to confirm that The Lane Construction Corporation is a highly regarded and valued client of Aon Risk Services Northeast and the
sureties, Zurich American lnsurance Company (A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of A+/Superior and Financial Size Category XV), Fidelity and
Deposit Company of Maryland (A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of A+/Superior and Financial Size Category XV) and Liberty Mutual lnsurance
Company (A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of A/Excellent and Financial Size Category XV), the 'co-sureties'. Each surety company is licensed
to conduct surety business in the state of Virginia, and each surety company holds a Certificate of Authority as listed in the Department of the
Treasury's Listing of Approved Sureties (Department Circular 570) dated July 1 , 2013.
The Lane Construction Corporation has developed a strong track record of completing complex construction projects on time and within the available
budget. ln the recent past, the co-sureties have executed bonds on behalf of The Lane Construction Corporation for individual projects with contract
values approaching $350,000,000 and corresponding backlogs approachrng $2,000,000,000. At this time, The Lane Construction Corporation is
capable of obtaining 100% Performance Bond and 100% Labor and Materials Payment Bond in the amount of the anticipated cost of consiruction,
and said bonds will cover the Project and any warranty periods as provided for in the Contract Documents on behalf of the Contractor, in the event
that such firm be the successful bidder and enter into a contract for this Project.
Naturally, as is customary within the surety industry, the issuance of any bonds is contingent upon a favorable underwriting review of project
specifics including, but not limited to, the contract terms, conditions, documents, bond forms and confirmation of complete project financing by both
The Lane Conskuction Corporation and its co-suretles at the time a request for bonds is made. We assume no liability to third parties or to you by
issuance of this letter, should bid or final bonds not be issued.
Should you need additional assurance regarding the technical ability or bonding capacity of The Lane Construction Corporation, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Zurich American lnsurance Company
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company
,ir r, ) ,i( i ['*:i{^,r+r* t" fphit ,[il,1_-,-.._
'Theresan E. Row-edder
Att,rrney- in-Frct
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYCOLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLANDPOWER OFATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of NewYork, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Maryland, and the FIDELITYAND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Maryland (herein collectively called the "Companies"), byTHOMAS O. MCCLELLAN, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V, Section 8, of the By-Laws of saidCompanies, which are set forth on the reverse side hereofand are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, do herebynominate, constitute, and appoint Kevin A. WHITE, Mark P. HERENDEEN, Jean CORREIA, Maria CHAVES, Theresan E.ROWEDDER, Bryan HUFT, Jeffrey HENDRICKS and Jane GILSON, all of Boston, Massachusetts, EACH its true and lawful agentand Attorney-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds andundertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Companies, as
fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York, New York., the regularly elected officers of the COLONIALAMERICAN CASUALTY AND SUREry COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Mary1and., and the regularly elected officers of theFIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPA|ry OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons.
The said Vice President does hereby certifu that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V, Section 8, ofthe By-Laws of said Companies, and is now in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice-President has hereunto subscribed his,/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, andFIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 30th day of May, A.D. 2013.
ATTEST:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYCOLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPAI\TY
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPAI{Y OF MARYI,AND
+rii$H$*:<; io:
"';:rr.i,;.#SJ
Byt; ).e--{'-
Assistant SecretaryEric D. Barnes
Maria D. Adamski, Notary PublicMy Commission Expires: July 8, 2015
-{,{ * wtf-t$Vice PresidentThomas O. McClellan
State of MarylandCity of Baltimore
On this 30th day of May, A.D. 2013, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, THOMAS O.
MCCLELLAN, Vice President, and ERIC D. BARNES, Assistant Secretary, of the Companies, to me penonally known to be the individuals arrd oificers
described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of same, and being by me duly swom, deposeth and Bith, that
he/she is the said officer ofthe Company aforesaid, and that the seals afiixed to the preceding instrument are the Corporate Seals ofsaid Companies, and that
the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction ofthe said
Corporations.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affrxed my Official Seal the day and year first above written.
POA-F 063-0474
^-..,iii:[j,/,;2
+rffi
EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES
"Article V, Section 8, Attornevs-in-Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice Presidentmay, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attomeys-in-fact with authority to execute bonds, policies,recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such
attorney-in-fact to affix the corporate seal thereto, and may with or without cause modifu of revoke any such appointment or authority at anytime."
CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned, Vice President of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICANCASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELIry AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certifu that theforegoing Power of Attomey is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certiff that Article V, Section 8, ofthe By-Laws of the Companies is still in force.
This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be sigrred by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board ofDirectors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998.
RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary
and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attorney...Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such
facsimile signature and seal shal1 be valid and binding on the Company."
This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board ofDirectors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALry AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day ofMay, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELIry AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a
meeting duly called and held on the 1 Oth day of May, 1 990.
RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature
of ar,y Vice-President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a
certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect
as though manually affixed.
,hi, ru-EJ"]t:f:Nia'Ja1T"t' ' 'l"r"jq":to subscribed mv name and affixed the corporate seals orthe said companies'
dr& #/**
ffi-+r,*.r.ffi4.,.si.
++*r j
Geoffrey Delisio, Vice President
THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS PRINTED ON RED BACKGROUND.This Pouer of Attorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated.
Cerlificate \6 {i14{i283
American Fire and Casualty CompanyThe 0hio Casualty lnsurance Company
Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company
West American lnsurance Company
POWER OF ATTORNEYKNOWN ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That American Fire & Casualty Company and The Ohio Casualty lnsurance Company are corporations duly organized under lhe laws of
andappoint, Brian Driscoll: Bryan Huft. Jane Gilson: Jean Correia: Jeffrey Hendricks: Kevin A. White: Maria Chaves: Mark P. Herendeen; Theresan E.a^,^rd.t.td,
all ofthecityof Boston ,stateof IMA eachindividuallyiftherebemorethanonenamed.itstrueandlawful attorney-in-facttomake,execute,seal,acknowledge
be as bindtng upon the Companies as if lhey have been duly signed by the president and attested by the secretary of the Companies in their own proper persons.
lN WITNESS WHEREOF thrs Power of Attorney has been subscrrbed by an authorized officer or officlal of the Companies and the corporate seals of the Compan es have been affixed
thereto this 31st day of Mav , 2013
American Fire and Casualty Company
The 0hio Casualty lnsurance CompanyLiberty Mutual lnsurance Company' :: : West American lnsurance Company
STATE 0F WASHINGTON ss
COUNTY OF KING
0n this 31 st day of l\lav , 2013 , before me personally appeared Gregory W. Davenport, who acknowledged himself to be the Assistant Secretary of American
Fire and Casualty Company. Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company, The Ohio Casualty Company, and WestAmencan lnsurance Company, and that he, as such. being authonzed so to do,
execute the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signlng on behalf of the corporat ons by himself as a duly authorized officer.
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal at Seattle, Washington, on the day and year first above wrtten.
1,,
"' 1b?'L'll'*^xffi
Company. Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company, and WestAmencan lnsurance Company which resolutions are now in full force and effect reading as follornls:
the provisions of this article may be revoked at any trme by the Board, the Chairman, the President or by the officer or officers grantrng such power or authority.
executed such instruments shall be as binding as if signed by the president and attested by the secretary
Certificate of Designation - The President of the Company, acting pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company, authonzes Gregory W Davenport. Assistant Secretary to appoint such
attomeys-inJact as may be necessar to acl on behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and
other surety obligations.
the same force and effect as though manually affixed.
is in full force and effect and has not been revoked.
lN TESTIMONY wHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed rhe seals of said companres tn slTrl oay.r [}/l*efX -
, 20 F-l
By:
L[,,1S 12873 092012 232 ot 300
Attachment 4.2.5SCC and DPOR Information
ATTACHMENT 4.2.5 State Project No. (FO)0495-029-123, P101, C501
SCC and DPOR Information
1 of 1
Offerors shall complete the table and include the required state registration and licensure information. By completing this table, Offerors certify that their team complies with the requirements set forth in Section 4.2.5 and that all businesses listed are active and in good standing.
SCC & DPOR INFORMATION FOR BUSINESSES (RFP Sections 4.2.5.1 and 4.2.5.2)
Business Name
SCC Information (4.2.5.1) DPOR Information (4.2.5.2)
SCC Number
SCC Type of Corporation
SCC Status
DPOR Registered Address
DPOR Registration
Type
DPOR Registration
Number DPOR Expiration
Date
The Lane Construction Corporation F0254476 Foreign
Corporation Active 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410
Contractor (Class A) 2701011871 01/31/2016
Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. F1343203 Foreign
Corporation Active 101 W. Broad St.,
Suite 301 Falls Church, VA 22046
Business Entity 0407005636 12/31/2015
Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. F1343203 Foreign
Corporation Active 7066 Samuel Morse Dr.
Suite 100 Columbia, MD 21046
Business Entity Branch Office 0411000839 02/29/2016
DMY Engineering Consultants Inc. 07688955 Corporation Active
45662 Terminal Drive, Suite 110
Dulles, VA 20166 Business Entity 0407005631 12/31/2015
Quinn Consulting Services Incorporated 04925517 Corporation Active
4094 Majestic Ln. # 281
Fairfax, VA 22033 Business Entity 0407003733 12/31/2015
Rinker Design Associates, P.C. 02270627 Corporation Active
9385 Discovery Blvd. Suite 200
Manassas, VA 20109 Business Entity 04050005024
12/31/2015
Attachment 4.2.5.1SCC Supporting Documentation
Attachment 4.2.5.2DPOR Supporting Documentation
Attachment 4.2.6(a)Lead Contractor Work History Form
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)
LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design
consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.
c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)
Original Contract Value
Final or Estimated Contract Value
I-495 EXPRESS LANES Fairfax County, Virginia HNTB
Name of Client./ Owner: Virginia Department of Transportation Phone: 571.483.2600 Project Manager: John Lynch, P.E. Phone: 571.238.2970 Email: [email protected]
12/2012 11/2012 (early delivery) $1,346,560 $1,481,670 $642,000
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly.
PROJECT SCOPE Construction of four new general-purpose traffic lanes (two in each direction) outside of the existing lanes on the Capital Beltway. Work included the reconstruction of ramps, interchanges, frontage roads, overpasses and underpasses, bridges and other necessary crossings. VDOT began studying short and long-term solutions to growing traffic congestion on the Capital Beltway in the late 1980s. By 1994 it had concluded High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes were needed. A private developer submitted plans for High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes in 2002 to the Commonwealth, which resulted in selecting that alternative in 2005. The Express Lanes project is the most significant package of improvements to the Capital Beltway in a generation. They provide drivers with the option of paying a toll for a faster, more predictable trip. Drivers using the Express Lanes have access to (HOV) lanes usually limited to vehicles with multiple occupants.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION LANE constructed two new lanes in each direction on a 14-mile stretch of I-495 from the Springfield Interchange to just north of the Dulles Toll Road. The project encompassed the replacement of more than $260 million of aging infrastructure, including more than 50 bridges and overpasses. Three new access points to the Capital Beltway at Rte. 29/Lee Highway, Westpark Bridge and Jones Branch Drive were designed and constructed as well as upgrades to 12 key interchanges. LANE also built more than 70,000 linear feet of sound walls to double the existing protection for local neighborhoods. LANE managed the ITS, communications and toll systems performed by subcontractors. LANE’s Virginia Sign and Lighting division performed significant electronic sign and highway electrical work.
PROJECT BENEFITS The new Express Lanes offer faster travel choices and congestion relief for motorists in the northern Virginia/Washington, D.C. region. Benefits to drivers, carpoolers, public transportation users and the business community already include: Less stop-and-go traffic Improved opportunities for reliable bus service for public transportation users Reduced cut-through traffic on local neighborhood streets Positive environmental impact because vehicles move through the area more quickly, reducing emissions
EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE “A solid experienced company that has built to standard and worked well under difficult traffic and space constraints to minimize impact on travel.” - Garrett Moore, P.E., VDOT Chief Engineer
“Project was built over four years under traffic as high as 200,000 vpd and achieved 5 million safe work hours as of September 2012 without a lost-time incident, making it among the safest heavy civil projects ever built in the U.S.” - Public Works Financing Newsletter, December 2012 The I-495 Express Lanes project has been the recipient of numerous awards including a safety award for more than 5,000,00 manhours without lost time incidents … and most recently was one of the Construction Management Association of America’s 2013 project award winers.
SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY
Design-Build project Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and
associated lighting Dynamic message signs Overhead lane control system ITS devices/systems (DMS, CCTV,
detection, video analytics, lane control)
Electrical,communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups
Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices
Field support for system software integration and testing
Drainage, erosion and sediment control
Stormwater management Concrete barrier and pier protection Extensive MOT Inspection, testing, quality
assurance and control
KEY PERSONNEL ON PROJECT
Kaushik Vyas, QA Manager Nagy Abdelwahed, QC Manager Daryoush Parendeh, QA Inspector Dennis Rodkey, Superintendent
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)
LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design
consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.
c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)
Original Contract Value
Final or Estimated Contract Value
NORTH AREA ROADS IMPROVEMENT
Dulles, VA JMT
Name of Client./ Owner: MWAA Phone: 703.417.8647 Project Manager: David Swennes Phone: 703.417.8647 Email: [email protected]
03/2008 11/2007 (early delivery) $29,681 $29,681 $29,681
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The North Area Roads Improvement project focused on the Dulles Area Access Highway (DIAAH) and associated areas and included: The construction of a new Collector-Distributor (C-D) Roadway system for the section of the DIAAH between Saarinen Circle and Route 28. The new C-D Roadway separates the Route 28 exiting traffic from DIAAH traffic destined for further on, thereby reducing the traffic congestion at three interchanges. Widening of the DIAAH from a four-lane to a six-lane highway to provide sufficient capacity for future DIAAH traffic. The project included the existing roadway demolition and the reconstruction and widening of 1.25 miles of the DIAAH entering and exiting the airport including bituminous concrete roadways, a 60±-foot span steel girder bridge, drainage improvements and storm water management facilities, overhead sign structures, and related traffic control, lighting and safety features. The project also included the widening of an existing bridge (inbound DIAAH over Horsepen Run) and the construction of a new bridge (inbound Collector-Distributor Road over Horsepen Run). The bridge required construction of a 60’, two-lane span with an integrated back wall and mechanically stabilized earth wall and included short and medium span steel plate girder designs . The project involved the construction of one large 8’ by 4’ by 295’ long concrete box culvert and a smaller 8’ by 4’ by 69’ long concrete box culvert. Two retaining walls were also included to allow the widening eastbound of the DIAAH and the construction of the inbound Collector-Distributor roadways to pass under existing bridges without reconstructing those bridges. The ultimate goal of the North Area Roads Improvement project was to create a roadway system capable of providing efficient access to Dulles International Airport that is easy for aiport patrons to understand and use.
PROJECT BENEFITS Provides airport passengers with better access to rental car facilities and long term parking lots Reduces traffic congestion and delays Improves traffic flow and roadway connectivity Improves passenger service
EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE LANE completed this project four months ahead of schedule.
Dulles Airport presented the project with the “Outstanding Safety Record Award” for the fourth quarter of 2006.
SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY
Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and associated
lighting Dynamic message signs Overhead lane control system ITS devices/systems (DMS, CCTV,
detection, video analytics, lane control) Electrical, communications, and fiber
optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups Configuring, integrating, and testing
new ATM field devices Field support for system software
integration and testing Drainage, erosion and sediment control Stormwater management Concrete barrier and pier protection Maintenance of traffic Inspection, testing, quality assurance
and control KEY PERSONNEL
Ken Prince, DB Project Manager Nagy Abdelwahed, QC Manager
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)
LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design
consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.
c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)
Original Contract Value
Final or Estimated Contract Value
I-66 SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
Arlington County, VA HNTB
Name of Client/Owner: VDOT Phone: 703.259.3240 Project Manager: Charles Mel Harvey Phone: 703.259.3240 Email: [email protected]
12/2011 12/2011 $10,200 $9,800 $9,800
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly.
PROJECT SCOPE This project consisted of the construction of a third lane on I-66 from the Fairfax Drive on ramp to the Sycamore Street off-ramp.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION LANE performed as the Lead Contractor on this first of three spot improvements on I-66 to reduce congestion and increase safety along westbound I-66 inside the Capital Beltway. This project added a third lane between the interchanges of the Fairfax Drive on-ramp (just west of George Mason Drive) to the existing deceleration lane at the Sycamore Street off-ramp (1.9 miles). The westbound acceleration and deceleration lane between Fairfax Drive and Sycamore Street was lengthened to form a continuous auxiliary lane between the two ramps. A new 12-foot-wide shoulder was constructed with full-strength pavement capable of carrying traffic during emergencies. LANE integrated ATMS elements into the existing VDOT system. The work included: sight distance improvements, variable and static message signs, traffic management systems, roadway lighting and landscaping in selected areas. All work was performed within the existing right-of-way. A multi-phased (three phases) construction approach was implemented to minimize the inconvenience to the traveling public through the area and get the completed road under traffic prior to inclement weather. Although motorists were expected to experience periodic lane closures until the project was complete, all lane closures were at night (no daytime, weekend or holiday closures) and the lack of disruption on this heavily-traveled interstate was notable. This project included similar circumsatnces to the I-495 Shoulder Use project and added much needed capacity to a heavily congested commuter thoroughfare. This enhancement also served the local population well for their everyday access through the community The project also included site access and egress challenges as well as tight work areas. In order to mitigate any impediments to the project, LANE worked closely with VDOT to establish MOTplans and conducted extensive orientation and training for supervisors and workers.
PROJECT BENEFITS This project added much needed capacity to this heavily congested commuter thoroughfare. This enhancement also serves the local population well for their everyday access through the community.
EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE The project was completed on time and the additional lane opened to traffic on December 5, 2011.
SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY
Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and
associated lighting Dynamic message signs Overhead lane control system ITS devices/systems (DMS, CCTV,
detection, video analytics, lane control)
Electrical,communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups
Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices
Field support for system software integration and testing
Drainage, erosion and sediment control
Stormwater management Concrete barrier and pier protection Maintenance of traffic Inspection, testing, quality
assurance and control
Attachment 4.2.6(b)Lead Designer Work History Form
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)
LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.
c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)
Construction Contract Value (Original)
Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)
I-95 SECTION 100 EXPRESS TOLL LANES I-895 TO MD 43 DESIGN
Baltimore, MD
Cherry Hill
Name of Client: Maryland Transportation Authority (MdTA) Phone: 410.537.7848 Project Manager: Dave LaBella, P.E. Phone:410.537.7848 Email: [email protected]
Fall/2014 Fall/2014 $142,600 $142,600 $3,200
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant. Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. performed all of the design work out of their Falls Church, VA office.
PROJECT SCOPE Construction of Express Toll Lanes (ETLs) on the most congested portion of I-95 north of Baltimore City. This 8-mile segment stretches from the I-895 (N) split in east Baltimore City, to north of MD 43 in White Marsh. When completed there will be two ETLs and four general-purpose lanes in each direction. Drivers traveling from north of MD 43 through to I-895 will have the choice of using the general-purpose lanes at no cost or paying a toll to use the ETLs. In addition, ETL access for drivers traveling on MD 43 will be provided to and from the south along I-95. The tolls will be managed to maintain relatively congestion-free traffic flow. The toll for using the ETLs will vary depending on the time of day and amount of traffic on the road.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION As a subconsultant, Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. (SWA), prepared a multitude of ITS, highway design, traffic engineering design and traffic analyses.
I-95 Express Toll Lanes Planning and Preliminary Engineering: SWA performed Highway Capacity Manual analyses for the IAPA report including Basic Freeway Segments, Weaving, and Ramps. SWA prepared micro simulation using VISSIM of the proposed geometrics of I-95 Section 100. The simulation models consisted of eight interchanges and over 15 miles of interstate highways. The simulation was prepared for 2025 Build conditions and 2010 Build and No-Build conditions. SWA prepared the signing concept plans for I-95 section 100, which consists of eleven miles of highway (I-95) and five interchanges with both general purpose and managed (toll) travel lanes. The work included inventory and evaluation of existing signing, development of 24 base plans, development of conceptual layouts, meeting with MdTA and the GEC to refine the concepts, development of final plans including sign size layout, detailed location design and support type selection.
I-95 Final ITS Design: SWA prepared ITS design for I-95 Section 100 that included 20 DMS signs, 15 CCTV Cameras, 2 Automatic Traffic Recorders, 8 Toll Rate Signs, Over Height Vehicle Detection Systems, Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS), and prepared details for conduit layout for ITS devices on five Toll Gantries. The ITS design included power and communications design for the ITS devices, Automatic Gate Control Systems, Toll Gantries, Over Height Vehicle Detection Systems, RWIS, and HAR. SWA prepared lighting and sign lighting design along I-95 from I-695 to north of MD 43, including point by point calculations photometric analysis on the proposed pavement surface, light trespass calculations, and veiling luminance calculations. SWA prepared traffic signalization design for two Baltimore City intersections. In addition, SWA developed the ITS standards, special provisions, and structural design and mounting details. SWA is also responsible for all sighting analysis of all CCTV, DMSs, RWIS, and HARs designed under contract including coordination with various utility companies including electrical, telephone and fiber optic.
PROJECT BENEFITS
The addition of toll lanes addresses the capacity and safety needs on Section 100 and thereby improves access, mobility, and safety for local, regional, and inter-regional traffic, including passenger, freight, and transit vehicles.
EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE
The I-95 Express Toll Lanes Project has received 14 awards for the work on this project, ranging from National to Local awards for Quality in Engineering, Construction, Partnering in Planning, Structures, Pavement, and others. The full list is available here: http://www.i-95expresstolllanes.com/contractor/awards.asp
SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY
Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint
repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and
associated lighting Dynamic message signs ITS devices/systems (DMS,
CCTV, detection, video analytics, lane control)
Electrical, communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups
Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices
Concrete barrier and pier protection
Maintenance of traffic Inspection, testing, quality
assurance and control
PROPOSED PERSONNEL FOR I-495 SHOULDER USE
Keith Riniker, PE, PTOE Bill Monroe, TSOS Jyothi Paladugu, PE, PTOE Images courtesy www.i-95expresstolllanes.com
I-95 and I-895 Interchange
I-695 with Future ETLs Highlighted
Future MD 43
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)
LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.
c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)
Construction Contract Value (Original)
Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)
INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR (ICC)
CONTRACT A Montgomery County, MD
INTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTORS,
A JOINT VENTURE OF GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CORMAN
CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND G.A. & F.C. WAGMAN, INC.
Name of Client: Maryland State Highway Administration Phone: 410.545.8772 Project Manager: Melinda Peters, P.E. Phone:410.545.8772 Email: [email protected]
12/2010 12/2010 $478,700 $478,700 $2,400
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.
PROJECT SCOPE Contract A was the first and westernmost portion of the ICC, extending seven miles from I-370 to just east of MD 97 in Montgomery County. The Intercounty Connector linked existing and developed areas between the I-270/I-370 and I-95/US 1 corridors within central and eastern Montgomery County and northwestern Prince George's County with a state-of-the-art, multi-modal east-west highway that limits access and accommodates the movement of passengers and goods. PROJECT DESCRIPTION As a Subconsultant, Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. (SWA) was responsible for the preparation of traffic engineering design plans. The work included extensive coordination with the Contractor and the State Highway Administration General Engineering Consultant for design modifications to provide better value and increased safety, while facilitating construction activities and minimizing costs. A majority of the design work was done out of the Design-Build Team’s project office with some aspects being performed in SWA’s Columbia, MD office. SWA’s work on this project consisted of the following:
A multi-staged MOT design with more than 90 plan sheets and included modifications to six miles of existing interstate roadway, construction of six miles of new interstate roadway with two new interchanges, modifications to four miles of arterial roadways, and seven bridges along roadways crossing over the ICC. The design included temporary channelization devices, signs, temporary roadways and markings and involved close coordination with the Contractor to improve constructability and reduce construction costs and duration. A Transportation Management Plan that evaluated MOT impacts to vehicular and pedestrian traffic, sequencing of construction, haul routes, impacts to/from nearby construction projects and impacts to emergency response. It included preparing conceptual MOT phasing in coordination with the contractor and MOT traffic analyses to evaluate traffic impacts during construction Prepared more than 150 sheets of signing and marking plans for six miles of new interstate roadway, six miles of signing modifications to existing interstate roadways, six interchanges, and five miles of signing modifications to arterial roadways. SWA was also responsible for the structural design for several of the proposed overhead and cantilever sign structures where the use of standard sign structures was not possible. Traffic signal and interconnect design for six intersections on three corridors including temporary signal and interconnect designs for MOT Signal warrant analyses based on MD MUTCD warrants for six intersections, corridor-wide CORSIM models for ICC and the intersecting arterials, intersection Level of Service and simulation analyses using Synchro/SimTraffic, and coordination of signal timing plans using Synchro and Montgomery County policies and traffic analyses for construction impacts. Temporary and permanent lighting designs, including lighting for two interchanges, continuous lighting along cross streets, underlass lighting, culvert lighting, tunnel lighting, and sign lighting. including photometric analyses with point-by-point calculations on the proposed pavement surface, light trespass calculations and veiling luminance calculations.
PROJECT BENEFITS This project provided a much-needed connection between MD 97 and the I-270 corridor reducing congestion on several local arteries and making them safer by removing conflicts between cross-county commuters, trucks and local residents. EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE The ICC team including Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. was awarded Engineering News Record’s (ENR) Northeast Region Best Project of 2011 for the successful completion of the ICC Contract A Project. Subsequent contracts B,C, and D/E, which SWA was designer on, have since won 16 major national awards to date.
SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY
• Design-Build • Surveying • Asphalt Paving • Signing and Striping • Overhead Sign Structures and
Associated Lighting • Dynamic Message Signs • Overhead Lane Control
System • ITS Devices/Systems • Electrical, Communications,
Fiber Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups
• MOT • Inspection, Testing, QA & C
PROPOSED PERSONNEL FOR I-495 SHOULDER USE
Keith Riniker, PE Bill Monroe, TSOS
SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY
Surveying Signing and striping Dynamic message signs ITS devices/systems (DMS,
CCTV, detection, video analytics, lane control)
Electrical, communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups
Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices
Field support for system software integration and testing
Inspection, testing, quality assurance and control
PROPOSED PERSONNEL FOR I-495 SHOULDER USE
Keith Riniker, PE, PTOE Bill Monroe, TSOS Jyothi Paladugu, PE, PTOE Ziad Sabra, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Dustin Schlipp, PE
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)
LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.
c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)
Construction Contract Value (Original)
Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)
CITY OF BALTIMORE ATMS CONTRACT NO. 880
Baltimore, MD MASTEC
Name of Client: City of Baltimore Phone: 443.984.2158 Project Manager: Raj Sharma Phone: 443.984.2158 Email: [email protected]
2013 Fall 2013 $42,500 $42,500 $4,500
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.
PROJECT SCOPE Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. (SWA) provided a multitude of traffic engineering, planning and design services for the upgrade of the signal system, which is currently in operation and controlling 960 signals in the City. All design work was done out of SWA’s Baltimore, MD office (which has since moved to Columbia, MD) and consisted of the following:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Traffic Signal System & Signal Timing Upgrades: SWA provided functional specifications to replace 1,300 signal controllers, construction plans and specifications to replace 17 communication hubs, technical specifications to replace the existing Transportation Management Center, technical specifications for a professional services contract for system integration to replace the signal system hardware and software including electronic test equipment and test procedures, and construction management and inspection services for the replacement of signal controllers. Following the completion of the ATMS upgrade, SWA retimed the City traffic signals in two phases and included traffic data collection, traffic engineering analysis, signal timing design, and field implementation and fine tuning of the optimized signal timing plans.
Transportation Management Center: SWA performed TMC planning, procurement, and central signal system integration. Under the construction management services, SWA was responsible for the day-to-day reporting of construction activities, preparing daily inspection reports, reviewing and approving invoices on behalf of City staff, representing the City of Baltimore at meetings with contractors, acting as a liaison between City agencies and contractors, and coordinating and conducting progress meetings with contractors and City of Baltimore managers and subordinates. ITS Design & Communication Upgrades: SWA prepared $6.5 M Federal Aid Job-Order-Contracts (bid book specifications) and final engineering plans for the construction of ten CCTV cameras and eleven Dynamic Message Signs in the City of Baltimore. SWA prepared the specifications for cameras, encoders, copper and fiber communication equipment, poles and cabinets, quantities and estimates. SWA also prepared CCTV design including bucket truck sighting analyses, photo renderings for DMS, location design, power and communication design, and design support during construction.
Traffic Signal Design: SWA prepared $4M Federal Aid Job-Order-Contracts (bid book specifications) for Signal Reconstruction, Signal Rewiring and Detector Replacement. Prepared 34 traffic signal designs and 20 detector replacements including wireless, video and inductive loops. Signal work included preparation of base plans including as-builds of signal equipment and surveys, field review of existing equipment, utility and ROW research, signal design and pedestrian detection, and ADA ramp design. SWA also prepared the City’s signal design checklist.
PROJECT BENEFITS This project provided a new TMC to the City, new CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, new traffic signal infrastructure, and improved signal timings.
EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE “Now that this project is concluded, we all feel the improvement in signal timing progression, lesser delays and the obvious reduction in stops in and around the City of Baltimore Central Business District and gateway arterials. The success of this project is attributed to the hard work, commitment, technical skills of your staff, and the leadership Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. has exhibited on this contract.” – Raj Sharma, Engineering Supervisor, Signal Section Traffic Division, City of Baltimore
DMS Design
CCTV Upgrade
Signal Upgrade
Transportation Management Center
Attachment 4.2.7 Conceptual Roadway Plans
DESIGN
’95 CADD LEVEL STRUCTURE
SURVEY HYDRAULICS - DRAINAGE
ENDWALLS (CELLS)
END SECTIONS (CELLS)
LEVEL 28
LEVEL 29
LEVEL 30
(STOP BARS & CROSSWALKS)
EXISTING TRANSVERSE MARKINGS
EXISTING HATCHING
LEVEL 45
LEVEL 46
LEVEL 47
LEVEL 48
LEVEL 49
LEVEL 50
LEVEL 51
GUARDRAIL AND JERSEY BARRIER
PROPOSED HATCHING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS LABELS
LEVEL 25
LEVEL 26
LEVEL 27
LEVEL 28
LEVEL 29
LEVEL 30
LEVEL 31
SIGN DETAIL SHEET
SIGN SCHEDULE SHEET
VA AND VIA STRUCTURE SHEETLEVEL 32
LEVEL 33
LEVEL 34
LEVEL 35 PROPOSED UNDER BRIDGE LIGHTING
LEVEL 36
LEVEL 37
LEVEL 38
LEVEL 39
LEVEL 40
LEVEL 41
LEVEL 42
LEVEL 43
LEVEL 44
LEVEL 52
SIGNAL LEGEND
SIGNAL POLE LEGEND
SIGNING LEGEND
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
LIGHTING LEGEND
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
’CLIP MASK’ BOUNDARIES
’CLIP BOUNDARY’ BOUNDARIES
LEVEL 62
LEVEL 63
LEVEL 53
LEVEL 54
LEVEL 55
LEVEL 56
LEVEL 57
LEVEL 58
LEVEL 59
LEVEL 60
LEVEL 61
SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - NB
SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - SB
SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - EB
SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - WB
BORDER SNAP LOCATIONS
PRINT BOUNDARY
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 30
GENERAL NOTES & PLAN NOTES
DIMENSIONS, TERMINATORS
WOOD LINE, TREES, SHRUBS, HEDGEROWS
SEPTIC TANKS, DRAIN FIELDS, WELLS
RIGHT OF WAY AND RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTS
STATE, COUNTY AND CITY BOUNDARY LINES
ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 30
LEVEL 1
EDGE OF PAVEMENT & PRIVATE ENTRANCES
ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 24
TO BE PLACED BY ROAD DESIGNERS
RESERVED FOR MISC. DRAIN. ITEMS
LEVEL 55-60
LEVEL 31-54
LEVEL 25-29
LEVEL 31-60
PIPES FROM 4" TO 42" (CUSTOM LINE STYLES)
PIPES 48" AND LARGER (CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
STANDARD BOX CULVERTS LC=0, WT=5
MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-2 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-3 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-4 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-7 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-10 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-11 AND DI-13 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-12 SERIES (CELLS)
DROP INLETS DI-14 SERIES (CELLS)
SWM BASIN (BASELINE/ALIGNMENT)
SWM BASIN (PLAN VIEW/CONTOURS)
SWM BASIN (MISCELLANEOUS/ITEMS)
SWM BASIN (DESCRIPTIONS/NOTES)
NOTE: ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE LABELS ON LEVEL 31
ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 30LEVEL 31-60
LEVEL 28-30
(EC-1, RIPRAP, CHECK DAMS) (CELLS)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL STONE
(SEDIMENT TRAPS & BASINS)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
(DIVERSION DIKES & DITCHES)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
(TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNELS)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(MISCELLANEOUS DIVERSION ITEMS)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(BRUSH BARRIERS, LEVEL SPREADERS, ETC.)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE I - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (PIPES)
LEVEL 31-60
SIGN FACES & NUMBERS (Legend)
PROPOSED AND EXISTING SIGNAL FACES & NUMBERS
CONDUIT, WIRE, JUNCTION BOXES
UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT LABELS
OVERHEAD UTILITY HEIGHT INFORMATION
EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS (LONGITUDINAL)
PHASE INFO, SIGNAL POLE DETAIL
LABELS SIGNAL HEAD LABELS, SIGN LABELS,
ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT LABELS SIGNAL POLE
EXISTING LETTERS/ARROWS/SYMBOLS
PROPOSED LETTERS/ARROWS/SYMBOLS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE & CELLS)
UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PIPE AND EW-12 ENDSECTIONS
CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, FOUNDATIONS, DUCT CABLE
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT
EXIST. CONDUIT/CABLE IDENTIFIER LABLE
LUMINAIRE LABEL, CONDUIT/CABLE IDENTIFIER LABEL,
LIGHTING LABELS POLE LOCATION LABEL,
BORDER TEXT - FILL-IN PRELIMINARY PLANS TITLE
PROPOSED SIGNAL POLES FOUNDATIONS
CLEARZONE TEMPLATES FOR SIGNAL/LIGHT POLES
OVERHEAD SIGN SUPPORT DATA SUMMARY & NOTES
EXISTING SIGN CALL-OUT
SIGN NUMBER/CALL-OUTS PROPOSED SIGN CALL-OUT,
DIRECTIONAL ARROWS (LANE ARRANGEMENTS ARROWS)
PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS (LONGITUDINAL)
VIDEO DETECTION ZONES, MICROLOOP PROBES
EXISTING LOOPS/VIDEO DETECTION ZONES LOOPS,
VIDEO DETECTION ZONES, MICROLOOP PROBE
PROPOSED LOOPS/VIDEO DETECTION ZONES LOOPS,
PHASE I - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (SWM)
PHASE I - PROPOSED CONTOURS
PHASE I - SYMBOLS, LEGEND AND NOTES
(EC-1, RIPRAP, CHECK DAMS) (CELLS)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL STONE
(SEDIMENT TRAPS & BASINS)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
(DIVERSION DIKES & DITCHES)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
(TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNELS)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(MISCELLANEOUS DIVERSION ITEMS)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE I - TEMPORARY DRAINAGE (PIPES)
(BRUSH BARRIERS, LEVEL SPREADERS, ETC.)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE II - TEMPORARY DRAINAGE (PIPES)
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE II - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (PIPES)
PHASE II - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (SWM)
PHASE II - PROPOSED CONTOURS
PHASE II - SYMBOLS, LEGEND AND NOTES
SEDIMENT CONTROL
EROSION &
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 1 1
CURB AND GUTTER
STEPS
RETAINING WALLS
LEVEL 16
LEVEL 1 7
LEVEL 12
LEVEL 13
LEVEL 14
LEVEL 15
LEVEL 61
LEVEL 62
LEVEL 63
LEVEL 18
LEVEL 19
LEVEL 20
LEVEL 21
LEVEL 22
LEVEL 23
LEVEL 24
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 1 1
CURB AND GUTTER
CURB
PAVED SHOULDER
STEPS
FENCES
RETAINING WALLS
LEVEL 16
LEVEL 1 7
LEVEL 12
LEVEL 13
LEVEL 14
LEVEL 15
LEVEL 61
LEVEL 62
LEVEL 63
LEVEL 18
LEVEL 19
LEVEL 20
LEVEL 21
LEVEL 22
PAVED DITCHES
RAILROADS, ETC.
LEVEL 23
LEVEL 24
BASELINE & SUB-TANGENTS
BRIDGES
GUARDRAIL & JERSEY BARRIER
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGES
LEVEL 25
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 1 1
LEVEL 12
LEVEL 13
LEVEL 14
LEVEL 15
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 1 1
LEVEL 16
LEVEL 1 7
LEVEL 12
LEVEL 13
LEVEL 14
LEVEL 15
LEVEL 61
LEVEL 18
LEVEL 19
LEVEL 20
LEVEL 21
LEVEL 22
LEVEL 23
LEVEL 24
LEVEL 26
LEVEL 27
LEVEL 62
LEVEL 63
LEVEL 25
TYPICAL DITCH DETAILS
PROJECT NOTES
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
NOT ASSIGNED
SIDEWALK AND/OR BICYCLE TRAIL
NOT ASSIGNED
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
LEVEL 8
LEVEL 9
LEVEL 10
LEVEL 1 1
LEVEL 16
LEVEL 1 7
LEVEL 12
LEVEL 13
LEVEL 14
LEVEL 15
LEVEL 18
LEVEL 19
LEVEL 20
LEVEL 21
LEVEL 22
LEVEL 23
LEVEL 24
LEVEL 26
LEVEL 27
LEVEL 25
NOT ASSIGNED
PROJECT NOTES
LEVEL 61
LEVEL 62
LEVEL 63
LEVEL 16
LEVEL 1 7
LEVEL 18
LEVEL 19
LEVEL 20
LEVEL 21
LEVEL 22
LEVEL 23
LEVEL 24
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
DITCHES AND FLUMES WT=4, LC=0
AND SPRING BOXES (CELLS)
ENERGY DISSIPATORS, PIPE SPILLOUT
(EC-1, RIPRAP CHANNEL, ETC.) (CELLS)
STONE & OUTLET PROTECTION
LUMINAIRES, ARMS, ELECTRICAL SERVICE, CONTROL CENTER
PROPOSED ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT POLES,
SLEEVE
JACKING PIT - 20’ PIPE SLEEVE JACKING PIT - 10’ PIPE
STAGING AREAS DIRECTIONAL BORE STAGING AREA,
(STOP BARS & CROSSWALKS)
PROPOSED TRANSVERSE MARKINGS
TCD’s, LABELS AND LEADERS
EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED R/W FOR
(SYMBOLS)
EXISTING SIGN LOCATIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES
SIGNS TO BE REMOVED
FACES, EXISTING SIGN LEADERS, ’X’ FOR EXISTING
EXISTING SIGN FACES & LEADERS EXISTING SIGN
(SYMBOLS)
PROPOSED SIGN LOCATIONS, INCLUDING STRUCTURES
ITEMS
PHASE I - MISCELLANEOUS EROSION CONTROL
ITEMS
PHASE II - MISCELLANEOUS EROSION CONTROL
PAVED & GRAVEL SHOULDER
WALKS (AROUND HOUSES & BUILDINGS)
FENCES & GATES
GUARDRAIL & JERSEY BARRIER
LEVEL 26 UTILITY EASEMENTS
LEVEL 30 EXISTING NOISE BARRIER WALLS
LEVEL 27 WELANDS
LEVEL 30 PROPOSED NOISE BARRIER WALLS & ANNOTATION
CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLES
EXISTING UNDERGROUND SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
NOTE:
information will be in separate files.in a separate file. Digital Terrain ModelSurvey Utility information will be
CURB & CONCRETE ISLANDS
SWIMMING POOLSBUILDINGS, PORCHES, DECKS, PATIOS &
POSTS, GAS ISLANDS & PLAYSETS
CONCRETE SLABS, BALLARDS, COLUMNS, SIGNS,
TANKS
ABOVE GROUND TANKS, DUMPSTERS, PROPANE
BODIES OF WATER, STREAMS, LAKES, ETC.
CULVERT PIPES
CATCH BASINS, DROP INLETS & DI MANHOLES
DAMS, ENDWALLS & ENDSECTIONS
DRAINAGE ITEMS
PAVED DITCHES, RIPRAP
ALL RAILROAD ITEMS, RAILROAD TIES
CEMETERY LOCATION & GRAVES
MONITORING WELLS, VENT PIPES, ETC.
GAS PUMPS, GAS TANKS, FILLER CAPS, LEVEL 28
MINE INFORMATIONLEVEL 29
NORTH ARROW, SCALE BAR, ETC.
TRAFFIC SIGNES IN R/W, BASE PLAN SHEET,
CENTERLINE, TRAVERSE, CONTROL STATION
ASPHALT PARKING LOTEDGE OF PAVEMENT, GRAVEL, CONCRETE,
SIDEWALK (ALONG ROADS); WHEELCHAIR RAMPS
& FLUSH MEDIAN DELINEATION
DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, PAVEMENTSTRIPING
CONCRETE SLABS, COLUMNS, SIGNS, POSTS
RIGHT-OF-WAY, TEMP. & PERM. EASEMENTS
PERMANENT EASEMENT, PROPERTY PINS
PROPERTY LINES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT,
BLOCKS
ARROW, MATCH LINES, SEALING & SIGNING
BASE PLAN SHEET, SCALE BAR, NORTH
PROJECT NOTES
GRID AND LABELS; ELEVATION TICKS,
ETC. WT= 5, LC= 0
BASE PLAN SHEET, SCALE BAR, NORTH ARROW,
MATCH LINES, ETC. WT= 5, LC= 0
BASE PLAN SHEET, SCALE BAR, NORTH ARROW,
(LC= 1, WT= 1)
PHASE II - EXISTING CONTOURS
SWM BASIN ITEMS (BASIN, RISERS, WEIRS, ETC.)
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
UNDERDRAINS (CD-1 & 2, UD-1, UD-2, ETC.)
SPECIAL DESIGN ITEMS (ENDWALLS, INLETS, ETC.)
(EC-2, EC-3, ETC.)(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL DITCH ITEMS
(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
(TFB, TSF, TURB. CURTAIN)
PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
(LC= 1, WT= 1)
PHASE I - EXISTING CONTOURS
DROP INLETS DI-1, DI-5 AND DI-9 SERIES (CELLS)
(EC-2, EC-3, ETC.)(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL DITCH ITEMS
(TFB, TSF, TURB. CURTAIN) (CUSTOM LINE STYLE)
PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS
CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLES
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
SIGNAL HEADS, PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTONS, ETC.
SIGNS ON SPANWIRE, MAST ARMS, POLES,
PROPOSED ABOVE GROUND MINOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
PHASING DIAGRAM, PREEMPTION DIAGRAM, TIMING CHART
SIGNAL CHARTS COLOR SEQUENCE CHART,
CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, DUCT CABLE
EXISTING UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT -- LIGHTING
ELECTRICAL SERVICE, ARMS
(INCLUDING UNDER BRIDGE), POLES, CONTROL CENTER,
EXISTING ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT -- LIGHTING LUMINAIRES
PUSHBUTTONS, CONTROLLER/CABINET&FOUNDATION, ETC.
POLE, MAST ARM, SPAN WIRE, SIGNAL HEADS, PEDESTRIAN
EXISTING ABOVE GROUND MINOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, DIRECTIONAL ARROW TEXT
LOCATION INFORMATION ROADWAY NAMES, BASELINE NAME,
FOUNDATION, UTILITY POLES
PF-3 MAST ARM, SPAN WIRE, CONTROLLER/ CABINET &
MAST ARM, COMBO MAST ARM, STRAIN, COMBO STRAIN, PF-2,
PROP. ABOVE GROUND MAJOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT POLE -
& FOUNDATION, UTILITY POLES
PF-2, PF-3 MAST ARM, SPAN WIRE, CONTROLLER/ CABINET
POLE - MAST ARM, COMBO MAST ARM, STRAIN, COMBO STRAIN,
EXIST. ABOVE GROUND MAJOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
FACES, PROPOSED SIGN LEADERS
PROPOSED SIGN FACES & LEADERS, PROPOSED SIGN
SIGNING WORKING LEVEL
LAYOUTS, SIGNAL WORKING LEVEL, LIGHTING WORKING LEVEL,
SIGNAL DESIGNER WORKING LEVEL PAVEMENT MARKING
VDOT LOGO, CONSULTANT LOGO
MATCHLINES, BORDER, STANDARD BORDER TEXT,
SHEET INFORMATION NORTH ARROW, SCALE BAR,
1F
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANSACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
1F
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001f.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:42:34 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
SHOULDER USE LANE
2A(1)
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
SHOULDER USE LANE
Varies 2.5’ - 8’
2.5’
SEE INSET B
SEE INSET B
NOT TO SCALE
INSET A
NOT TO SCALE
INSET B
Exist. Crown Pt.
13
Prop. Crown Pt.BL
Varies
1
46
8
8
SEE INSET A
SEE INSET A
MEDIAN BARRIER BUMPOUT DETAIL
SIGN STRUCTURE
VARIES 140’ - 280’
STA 115+77.64 TO STA 123+27.00
OLD DOMINION DRIVE
STA 123+27.00 TO STA 123+62.49
NOT TO SCALE
FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR
Ex. Joint
6’
4.5’
Sawcut (PCC only)
Full Depth
3
1 2 392’
PROP. UD-4
PROP. UD-4
10
MECHANICAL ANCHORS
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
EXISTING FINISHED GRADEEXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
3 IN. MAX*
MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*
32"
BARRIER MODIFICATION
MECHANICAL ANCHORS
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
EXISTING FINISHED GRADEEXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
3 IN. MAX*
MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*
32"
MECHANICAL ANCHORS
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
EXISTING FINISHED GRADE
EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER3 IN. MAX*
MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 1 BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 2 BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS SINGLE BARRIER FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS DOUBLE BARRIER FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS BIFURCATED
full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement
Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing
High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane
Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"
with 4% hydraulic cement by weight
Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed
Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B
Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)
Ex. 16’ clr.
Pro
p. 16’ min. clr.
See Note 8St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
See Note 8
1.50% - 2.00%
1.50% - 2.00%
9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER
NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE
9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER
NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE
9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER
NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE
9’ - 12’
12’
PROP. GR-2
LONGITUDINAL TAPER RATE OF 26:1.
2. BARRIER MODIFICATIONS SHALL HAVE A
1. BARRIER GLARE SHIELDS SHALL BE REPLACED.
NOTES:
9" Ex. PCC
6" Ex. CTA
4"-5" Ex. Asphalt 4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
9" Ex. PCC
6" Ex. CTA
USE LANE.
THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER
SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION
9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET
SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.
WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE
8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION
OF 10 LB/SY.
CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE
0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL
COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF
7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED
6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.
TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING
5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH
AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.
4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT
FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.
3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY
2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.
REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.
1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,
NOTES:
**
**
** See Note 9
** See Note 9
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
2A(1)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513002a(1).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:03:28 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
B
SHOULDER USE LANE
2A(2)
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
SHOULDER USE LANEVaries 2.5’ - 4.5’
5’ - 12’
SEE INSET B
SEE INSET A
STA 123+62.49 TO STA 125+89.30
SCOTTS RUN BRIDGESTA 125+89.30 TO STA 128+07.45
2’
PROP. UD-4
NOT TO SCALE
INSET A
NOT TO SCALE
INSET B
Exist. Crown Pt.
13
Prop. Crown Pt.BL
Varies
1
46
8
8
NOT TO SCALE
FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR
6’
4.5’
Sawcut (PCC only)
Full Depth
3
1 2 39 10
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION
2" MILLING AND OVERLAY
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A
SEE INSET B
2’
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION
L
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE
B
SHOULDER USE LANE
STA 128+07.45 TO STA 148+50.00
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement
Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing
High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane
Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"
with 4% hydraulic cement by weight
Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed
Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B
Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)
MATCH EXISTING
TRANSITION LENGTH
NOT TO SCALE
PAVEMENT TIE-IN
13
4" MIN.
8EXISTING PAVEMENT
TIE INTO EXISTING
See Note 8St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
600
1
1.50% - 2.00%
See Note 8 1.50% - 2.00%
3.5’
See
3.5’
5’-6’
6’-9’
Ex. Joint4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
9" Ex. PCC
6" Ex. CTA
4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
9" Ex. PCC
6" Ex. CTA
Note 10
**
**
IMPACTED DUE TO PAVEMENT BUILDUP.
10. MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER. EXISTING EXPANSION JOINT TO BE REPLACED WHERE
USE LANE.
THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER
SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION
9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET
SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.
WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE
8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION
OF 10 LB/SY.
CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE
0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL
COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF
7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED
6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.
TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING
5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH
AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.
4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT
FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.
3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY
2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.
REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.
1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,
NOTES:
** See Note 9
** See Note 9
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
CONTACT POINTS WITH THE PAVEMENT SURFACE SHALL NOT EXCEED �".
SPECIFICATIONS. THE VARIATION FROM THE TESTING EDGE OF THE STRAIGHT EDGE BETWEEN ANY TWO
STRAIGHT EDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 315.07(A) OF THE
SPECIFICATION EXCEPT THAT ALL JOINTS AT TIE-IN LOCATIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED USING A 10-FOOT
2. PAVEMENT TIE-IN SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 315.05(C) OF THE
PROJECT. TRANSITION LENGTH SHALL BE 150’ MINIMUM.
AND EXISTING PAVEMENT AT SCOTTS RUN BRIDGE, AT RAMP TIE-INS AND AT THE BEGINNING/END OF
1. PAVEMENT TIE-IN SHALL BE USED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PAVEMENT OVERLAY
NOTES:
2A(2)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513002a(2).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:05:30 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
TYPICAL SECTIONS
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
B
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
SHOULDER USE LANE
2A(3)
2.5’
SEE INSET DSEE INSET A
12’
SHOULDER
STA 155+00 TO 163+50
STA 158+00 TO 162+00
GEORGETOWN PIKESTA 164+52.40 TO STA 165+26.00
2’
NOT TO SCALE
INSET A
NOT TO SCALE
INSET B
Exist. Crown Pt.
13
Prop. Crown Pt.BL
Varies
1
46
6
8
NOT TO SCALE
6’
4.5’
Sawcut (PCC only)
Full Depth
3
1 23
9 10
NOT TO SCALE
1
578
3 10
JOINT REPAIR
FULL DEPTH PATCH/ INSET D
TRANSITION LENGTH
NOT TO SCALE
1
EXISTING PAVEMENT
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A
SHOULDER USE LANE
SEE INSET C
STA 148+50.00 TO STA 164+52.40
2’
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION
I-495 NORTHBOUND
NOT TO SCALE
INSET C
1
578
3 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement
Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing
High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane
Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"
with 4% hydraulic cement by weight
Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed
Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B
Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)
EXISTING ELEVATION
Transition Detail
MILLING (4" MIN.) PROPOSED ELEVATIONAT GEORGETOWN PIKE
MILLING (5" MIN.)
13
TO OBTAIN MIN. 16’-0" CLEARANCEONLY REQ’D AT GEORGETOWN PIKE BRIDGE
Ex. 15’-9" clr.
Pro
p. 16’ min. clr.
PROP. UD-4
PROP. UD-4
PROP. UD-4
PROP. UD-4
See Note 8 St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11See Note 8
600
3% - 4.18% Super
4.18% Super
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
4’-24’
24’ WIDE SHOULDER
2’-4’
Ex. Joint4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
9" Ex. PCC
6" Ex. CTA6" Ex. CTA
9" Ex. PCC
4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
USE LANE.
THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER
SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION
9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET
SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.
WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE
8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION
OF 10 LB/SY.
CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE
0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL
COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF
7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED
6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.
TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING
5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH
AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.
4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT
FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.
3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY
2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.
REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.
1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,
NOTES:
**
** See Note 9
** See Note 9
**
Temp. Const. Barrier from Survey
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS2A(3)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513002a(3).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:09:46 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’4.6’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
SHOULDER USE LANE
2A(4)
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A
SHOULDER USE LANE
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
SHOULDER USE LANE
SEE INSET C
SEE INSET B
SEE INSET A
SEE INSET A
SHOULDER
11’
AUX. LANE SHOULDER
SEE INSET B
11’
AUX. LANE SHOULDER
STA 165+26.00 TO STA 172+00.00
LIVE OAK DRIVESTA 186+38.50 TO STA 186+70.58
STA 186+70.58 TO STA 211+81.74
2’
2’
PROP. UD-4
PROP. UD-4
NOT TO SCALE
INSET A
NOT TO SCALE
INSET B
Exist. Crown Pt.
13
Prop. Crown Pt.BL
Varies
1
46
6
8
NOT TO SCALE
6’
4.5’
Sawcut (PCC only)
Full Depth
3
1 2
3
9
10
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
L
11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’ 11’2.5’
I-495 NORTHBOUND
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
B
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A
SHOULDER USE LANE
SEE INSET B
AUX. LANE SHOULDER
STA 172+00.00 TO STA 186+38.50
PROP. UD-4
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION
NOT TO SCALE
INSET C
1
578
3 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement
Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing
High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane
Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"
with 4% hydraulic cement by weight
Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed
Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B
Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)
Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)
1.50% - 2.00%
1.50% - 2.00%
1.50% - 2.00%
PROP. UD-4
See Note 8 St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
St’d GS-11
See Note 8
See Note 8
See Note 8
1.50% - 2.00%
8’-12’
8’-12’
9.5’
8’-11’
Ex. Joint4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
9" Ex. PCC
6" Ex. CTA6" Ex. CTA
4"-5" Ex. Asphalt
9" Ex. PCC
**
**
**
**
** See Note 9
** See Note 9
** See Note 9
** See Note 9
JOINT REPAIR
FULL DEPTH PATCH/
ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER USE LANE.
HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5%
LATERAL OFFSET SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE
9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE
MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.
SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN
SUPERELEVATION WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF
8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE
B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 10 LB/SY.
OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING
APPLIED AT A RATE OF 0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE
STABILIZED COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2
7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT
6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
FOR SEALING CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.
WITH TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS
5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED
SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.
OF PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL
4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH
CORRECTION.
3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY FOR SLOPE
DESIGN.
2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT
PLAN SHEETS.
1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT, REFER TO
NOTES:
2A(4)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513002a(4).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:11:01 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
Mile
Marker
E
TT
TCTC
TC
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
PT 117
+82.3
1
118
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513003.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:49:59 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 118
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 4
3
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
C1
C1
STA. 115+75.00
BEGIN PROJECT 0495-029-123 P101, C501
I-495 NORTHBOUND
I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
T = 891.27’
L = 1,782.31’
R = 46,043.27’
100+00.00PC =
PT = 117+82.31
PI = 108+91.27
Curve NBB001
UNDERDRAIN UD-4
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#
E = MATCH EXISTING
V = 70 MPH
150’ MIN.
SEE NOTE 3
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
4. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
SHEET 2A(2).
3. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETIAL SEE TYPICAL SECTION
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
3
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
SS 10
0+0
0.0
0
=
03°02’5
2" Lt.
PI 105+9
8.6
8
279. 10’ Rt.
+11. 33
MONF 235. 97’ Rt.
+64. 66
MONF
64
64-a
(a)
(b)
64-b
64-c
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
24
24-a
Inv. Out = 242. 37’
In Pl. 6" Plastic Pipe
In Pl. U. D.
25
63
63-a
25-a
64-d
65
64-e
Soundwall
Face Of
Soundwall
Face OfExist. R/W & L/A Line
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway Survey Baseline
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
S. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
N. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per V
DOT Highw
ay Plan 0
413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Gate
Scotts R
un
Brush
Scotts
Run
Metal Guardrail
Conc. Jersey Wall
Scotts
Run
285
294
296
S
TCTC
TC
C
D S
Lig
ht
Pole
Lig
ht
Pole
EOI
EOI
EOI
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
PT 117
+82.3
1
118 119 12
0 121 122 123
PC 12
3+2
6.3
3
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513004.dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:12:21 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 118
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 3
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 132
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 5
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
4
I-495 NORTHBOUND
I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
OL
D
DO
MINIO
N
RO
AD
C2
C2 Curve NBB002
PI = 131+87.79
T = 861.46’
L = 1,704.54’
R = 4,770.00’
123+26.33PC =
PT = 140+30.87
PROPOSED MB-7DPROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 122+36.40 TO STA. 123+65.87
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 130+30.36 TO STA. 131+69.96
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
37 14 19
23
UNDERDRAIN UD-4
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.23%
V = 70 MPH
MODIFY EXISTING BARRIERST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
150’ MIN.
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
SEE NOTE 4SEE NOTE 4
150’ MIN.
PROPOSED GR-2
PROP GR-FOA-2
PROPOSED GR-FOA-2
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACE AT A LOCATION
SHEET 2A(2).
4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION
SURVEY.
3. THE OLD DOMINION BRIDGE SHOWN FROM SUPPLEMENTAL
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
4
111
112
113 11
4 115 11
6 117 11
8 119
120
121
122
123
124
=
00°5
7’4
3"
Rt.
PI 112
+44.0
2
=
06°02’18"
Rt.
PI 118
+87.2
6
78. 12’ Lt.+58. 22IPF
77. 93.’ Lt.+55. 43MONF
212. 35’ Rt.
+8. 54
MONF
233. 69’ Rt.
+89. 75
MONF
469. 19’ Rt.+23. 97MONF
439. 36’ Rt.+3. 20
MONF
26
26-a
27-a
62
62-a
27-B
Inv. Out = 233. 63’In Pl. 6" Plastic PipeIn Pl. U. D.
28
28-d
28-c28-b
28-a
293
294
296
295
298
297
1175
1174
1173
28-e
Conc. Ditch
SoundwallFace Of
SoundwallFace Of
SoundwallFace Of
Per V
DOT
Highw
ay
Plan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R/
W
& L/
A Line
Per VDOT Hi
ghway Plan
0413-029-00
7, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A
Line
Per V
DO
T
Hig
hway Pla
n 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist.
R/
W
Per V
DOT Highw
ay Plan 0
413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Per
VDOT Highw
ay Plan
0413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist.
R/W
& L/
A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
O/
H
Sig
n
Brush
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)
DeckDeck Rip-Rap
Asphalt Shoulder
Metal Guardra
il
Reflector
Reflector
Woven Wire Fence
132 13
3 134 13
5
136
137
138
139
140
PT 14
0+3
0.8
7
141
142
143
144
145
146
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513005.dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:13:14 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 146+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 6
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 13
2+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 4
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
5
C2
C2
I-495 NORTHBOUND
I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
Curve NBB002
PI = 131+87.79
T = 861.46’
L = 1,704.54’
R = 4,770.00’
123+26.33PC =
PT = 140+30.87
PROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 139+30.37 TO STA. 140+70.18
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
37
4448
58
62
63
75
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.23%
V = 70 MPH
MODIFY EXISTING BARRIER
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
5
125
126
127 12
8 129 13
0 131 13
2
133
134
135
136
137
138
=
07°5
6’3
9" Rt.
PI 126+3
1.34 =
03°05’3
3"
Rt.
PI 132
+23.11
=
00°50’4
0"
Rt.
PI 137+6
5.0
8
74. 50’ Lt.
+97. 26
IPF
74. 56’ Lt.
+87. 81
MONF
230. 31’ Rt.
+41. 90
IPF223. 98’ Rt.+7. 74
IPF
216. 43’ Rt.+30. 22IPF
1172
1462
1183
1182
1181
(a)
(b)
1178
1179
1180
1177
1176
1188
1189
29
29-a
23
23-a
1185-a
1185-b
1186
1187
(a)
(b)
Per VDOT Highway Plan
0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A L
ine
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
E
E
TC
TC
T
TC
T
F. O.
HH
TC
O/
H
Sig
n
U/C
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)
Paved Parking
Paved ParkingPaved Parking
Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686
Ramp
Brush
Asphalt Shoulder
Conc. Jersey
Wall
Mile
Marker
Sig
n
Sig
n
Sig
n
Grass
Brush
Gravel Shoulder
Reflector
1425
146
147
148
PC 14
8+7
1.61
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 157 15
8 159 16
0
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513006.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:54:23 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 146+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 5
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 16
0+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 7
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
6
C3
C3
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND
Curve NBB003
PI = 160+34.88
T = 1,163.27’
L = 2,283.06’
R = 4,830.00’
148+71.61PC =
PT = 171+54.66
WIDE SHOULDER AREA
APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR
PROPOSED MB-7D
PROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 153+26.78 TO STA. 154+70.75
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 158+31.24 TO STA. 159+70.67
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
91
117
122
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.18%
V = 70 MPH
15’
98
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
SEE NOTE 3
150’ MIN.
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
ZONE
BARRIER FOR WORK
TEMPORARY CONCRETESEE NOTE 4
PRIOR TO WORK ZONE
OF EXISTING SHOULDER
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONZONE
BARRIER FOR WORK
TEMPORARY CONCRETE
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
OF CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL FULL DEPTH SHOULDER WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME
SHEET 2A(2).
3. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
6
139
140
141
142
143
144 14
5 146 14
7 148 14
9 150 15
1
152
=
06°44’2
6" Lt.
PI 143
+63.3
9
=
08°18
’37" Lt.
PI 151+24.6
7
60. 24’ Lt.+51. 57MONF
243. 84 Rt.+84. 347MONF237. 02’ Rt.
+61. 02
IPF
244. 30’ Rt.+94. 95MONF
1184 30
30-a
31-a
31
1190
1191
1192
1193
32
32-a
1194
1195
19
18
17
15
21
20
16
1
14
1424
1423
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Soundwall
Face Of
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per V
DOT High
way Plan 0
413-02
9-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/W
& L/
A Lin
e
Per V
DOT
Hig
hway P
lan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Per VDOT
Highwa
y Plan
0413-02
9-007, R
W-2
Exist.
L/A Lin
e
Per VDOT
Highway
Plan 041
3-029-00
7, RW-2
Exist. R/
W
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Line
Conc.
Sound Ba
rrier Wal
l
Ramp
Ramp
Ramp
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt
Asphalt
Conc. Jersey Wall
Sig
n Reflector
Sign
Sign
Sign
(2) Signs
Sign
Reflector
Sign
Sign
Reflector
Sig
n
Buildings
Maint.
Signs
Sig
nSig
n
Asphalt
SignSi
gn
Sig
n
Gravel Shoulder
CG-2
CG-2
Gravel S
hould
er
Stone Column
Sign
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
T
TC
E
TC
Traf.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
Cab.
Elec.
HH
Elec.
Box
Traf. Sig
nal
Elec.
HH
Hydrant
EOI
EOI
EOI
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Traf.
Cab.
Utility Pole
EOI
w/
Traf.
Cab.
Utility Pole
F. O.
HH
F. O.
Wit. Post
F. O.
Wit. Post
F. O.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
HH
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170 171
PT 17
1+54.6
6
172 17
3 174
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513007.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:55:29 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 17
4+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 8
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 160+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 6
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
7
C3
C3
I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
I-495 NORTHBOUND
GE
OR
GE
TO
WN PIK
E (R
TE 19
3)
Curve NBB003
PI = 160+34.88
T = 1,163.27’
L = 2,283.06’
R = 4,830.00’
148+71.61PC =
PT = 171+54.66
WIDE SHOULDER AREA
APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR
PROPOSED MB-7DPROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 163+26.92 TO STA. 164+72.22
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 169+26.37 TO STA. 170+70.96
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
133
142 146151
160
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 4.18%
V = 70 MPH
8.5’
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
150’ MIN.
SEE NOTE 4
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
SHEET 2A(2).
4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION
SURVEY.
3. THE GEORGETOWN PIKE BRIDGE IS SHOWN FROM SUPPLEMENTAL
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
7
153
154
155
156
157
158 15
9 160
161
162
163
164
165
166
=
09°5
7’2
4" Lt.
PI 157+5
7.9
7
=
03°4
7’0
0" Lt.
PI 165+4
2.3
3
151. 85’ Lt.+33. 06MONF
204. 29’ Lt.+51. 27MONF200. 45’ Lt.
+91. 06
MONF
1196-a
1196
1197-a
1197-b
2
3
1200-a
1200
12011202
1427
(a)
(b)
Soundwall
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
S. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
N. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0
413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Li
ne
Per V
DO
T
Hig
hway Pla
n 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. L
/A
Lin
e
Per V
DOT
Hig
hway Pla
n 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist.
R/
W
Per VDOT
Highway
Plan 041
3-029-00
7, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L
/A Line
Per VDOT Highway P
lan 0413-029-
007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per V
DOT
Highw
ay Plan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Per V
DOT Highw
ay Plan
0413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/
W
& L/
A Line
Live Oak Drive
Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686
Asphalt Shoulder
EE
V
EOI
(DA
TU
R)
(DA
TU
R)
(DATUR)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513008.dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:00:03 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
174
175
176
177
178
PC 17
8+4
8.5
4
179
180 18
1 182
183
184
185
186
187
188
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 16
7+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 7
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 188+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 9
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
8
C4
C4
I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
I-495 NORTHBOUND
LIV
E
OA
K
DRIV
E
Curve NBB004
PI = 186+04.22
T = 755.68’
L = 1,439.16’
R = 1,910.00’
178+48.54PC =
PT = 192+87.70
PROPOSED MB-7D
PROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 177+31.00 TO STA. 178+70.50
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 184+59.78 TO STA. 187+49.91
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
166
179
171
UNDERDRAIN UD-4
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 7.95%
V = 70 MPH
PROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 181+30.35 TO STA. 182+71.03
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D
TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION
150’ MIN.
SEE NOTE 4
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
8
167
168
169
170
171
172
173 17
4
175
176
177
178
179
180
= 15
°57’0
1" Rt.
PI 173+17.4
2
=
13°29’5
6"
Rt.
PI 177+7
2.7
2
47. 12’
Lt.+65. 34
MONF
56. 70’
Lt.+83. 51
MONF
1427
1204
1203
1206
1205-a
1205-b
40-b
40-a
39-b
41-a
41-b
101
102
100
4
61
60
103
104
105
106
107
42-a
42-b
1204-a
154155
105-a
Conc. Ditch
Conc.
Ditch
Conc. Ditch
Soundwall
Soundwall
Soundwall
Soundwall
Face Of
Per VDOT
Highwa
y Plan
0413-0
29-007, RW-2
Exist. R/
W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT
Highway
Plan 041
3-029-00
7, RW-2
Exist. R/
W & L/A Li
ne
Per V
DOT High
way Plan 0
413-02
9-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line The
Limited
Access Line In T
his
Area.
Unclear
As T
o The
Locatio
n Of
The
Existin
g Hi
ghwa
y Plans
Are
Per
VDOT Highw
ay Plan
0413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/W
Line
Per VDOT
Highway Pla
n 0413-
029-007
, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L
/A Line
Live Oak Drive
Paved Parking
Paved Parking
Live Oak Drive
Ramp
Sound Barrier
Wall
Metal Guardrail
Metal Guardrail
E
E
E
TC
TC
TCTC
TC
TC
TC
Lig
ht
Pole
Elec.
Cab.
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
Cab.
(DATUR)
(DA
TU
R)
(DA
TU
R)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513009.dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:00:30 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
188
189
190 19
1 192
PT 19
2+8
7.7
0
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 18
8+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 8
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
02
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 10
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
9
C4
C4
I-495 SOUTHBOUND
I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
I-495 NORTHBOUND
Curve NBB004
PI = 186+04.22
T = 755.68’
L = 1,439.16’
R = 1,910.00’
178+48.54PC =
PT = 192+87.70
218
228236
241
250
UNDERDRAIN UD-4
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 7.95%
V = 70 MPH
PROPOSED MB-7D
SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL
STA. 188+71.24 TO STA. 190+11.05
MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
9
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
=
14°22’5
7" Rt.
PI 182+7
1.51
=
01°19’2
1" Rt.
PI 190+4
8.6
8
116. 73’ Lt.
+23. 49
IPF
42-b
110
108
58
111
112
43-a
43-b
113
114
115
116
118
119
120
121
57
122
123
124
44-a
44-b
5 6
125126
129
128
117-a
117-b
261. 52’ Rt.+68.
24MONF
259. 87’ Rt.
+41. 94
MONF
(a)
(b)
Conc. Ditch
Conc. Ditch
Sou
ndwall
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
S. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
N. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
Per V
DOT
Hig
hway
Plan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R/
W
Line
Per VDOT
Highway Pla
n 0413-
029-007
, RW-2
Exist.
L/A Lin
e Per VDOT H
ighway Plan
0413-029-0
07, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT H
ighway Pla
n 0413-029
-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/
A Line
E
E
E
E E
E
E
E
E
E
T
EE
Elec.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
Wit. Post
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
Meter
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
E
(DA
TU
R)
(DA
TU
R)
Dense Trees
O/
H
Sig
n
Cellular
Antenna
Crash
Barrier
George W
ashington Mem
orial Parkw
ay
Sound Barrier Wall
Ramp
Metal Guardrail
Metal Guardrail
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513010.dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:01:37 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
PC 211+8
2.4
2
212
213 214
215
216
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
02
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 9
10
C5
C5
I-495 SOUTHBOUND I-495 NORTHBOUND BL
I-495 NORTHBOUND
GE
OR
GE
WASHIN
GTON
ME
MORIA
L PAR
KW
AY
PC =
PT =
STA. 211+82.42
END PROJECT 0495-029-123 P101,C501
270287
298
UNDERDRAIN UD-4
LEGEND
Denotes Proposed Pavement
Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement
Denotes Demolition of Pavement
and Joint Repair Number
Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = MATCH EXISTING
V = 70 MPH
150’ MIN.
SEE NOTE 4
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
Curve NBB005
PI = 221+05.40
T = 922.98’
L = 1,724.11’
R = 1,950.00’
211+82.42
229+06.54
BE
GIN P
AV’T
TIE-I
N
EN
D
PA
V’T
TIE-I
N
150’ MIN.SEE NOTE 4
APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).
5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION
SHEET 2A(2).
4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION
FROM SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY.
3. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY BRIDGE IS SHOWN
FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN
TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.
1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR
NOTES:
10
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
=
00°28’5
0" Lt.
PI 195+8
3.3
0
=
18°42’3
2"
Rt.
PI 2
01+95.6
5
= 28°56’5
1" Lt.
PI 2
07+8
5.8
9
128
45-a
45-b
7 8
131130
132
133
910
11
12
11-a135
136137
56 55
138
139140
46-a
46-b
141
142
143
144
47
48
291. 87’ Rt.
+34. 42
MONF
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)(b)
Conc.
Ditch
Conc. DitchConc. Ditch
Conc. D
itch
Conc. DitchConc. Ditch
Soundwall
Soundwall
Face Of
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:25:51 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
DHV
V (MPH)
REVISED
STATE LINE
CITY,TOWN OR VILLAGERIGHT OF WAY LINEFENCE LINEUNFENCED PROPERTY LINEFENCED PROPERTY LINEWATER LINESANITARY SEWER LINEGAS LINEELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLETRAVELED WAYGUARD RAILRETAINING WALLRAILROADSBASE OR SURVEY LINE
LEVEE OR EMBANKMENTBRIDGESCULVERTSDROP INLETPOWER POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH LINESHEDGETREESHEAVY WOODSGROUND ELEVATIONGRADE ELEVATION
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
30
30
+50
DATUM LINE
DATUM LINE
173
175
T/Tg
E
6" W
8" S
4" G
PLPL
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PLAN AND PROFILE OF PROPOSED
STATE HIGHWAY
SCALE
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND TRAFFIC DATA
D (%) (design hour)
T (%) (design hour)
WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED.
THE ORIGINAL APPROVED TITLE SHEET(S), INCLUDING ORIGINAL
SIGNATURES, ARE FILED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY.
ANY MISUSE OF ELECTRONIC FILES, INCLUDING SCANNED SIGNATURES,
IS ILLEGAL AND ENFORCED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW.
ALL CURVES ARE TO BE SUPERELEVATED, TRANSITIONED AND
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION
AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT.
THIS PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
STATE
PROJECT
NO.
SECTIONEQUALITIES
FEET
LENGTH INCLUDINGFEDERAL AID
PROJECT NO.FEET FEETMILES MILES
LENGTH EXCLUDINGTYPE
PROJECTDESCRIPTIONBRIDGE(S) BRIDGE(S)TYPE
CODE
UPC
NO.
BRIDGE
PROJECT
NO.
Project Lengths are based on Construction Baseline.
AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, 2009 MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENT TO
AMENDED BY CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC
PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY.
THE MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND AS
DEPARTMENT’S 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, 2008 ROAD
COUNTY LINE
SIGNATURES AND THE OFFICIAL PLAN ASSEMBLY IN ELECTRONIC
AS AWARDED, HAS BEEN SEALED AND SIGNED USING DIGITAL
FORMAT IS STORED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY,
INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS, WILL BE THE OFFICIAL
CONSTRUCTION PLANS. FOR INFORMATION RELATIVE TO ELECTRONIC
FILES AND LAYERED PLANS, SEE THE GENERAL NOTES.
THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY
GEOPAK Computer Identification No. 105130
DESIGN PACKAGE (GEOPAK).
THIS PROJECT WAS DEVELOPED UTILIZING THE DEPARTMENT’S ENGINEERING
800’0’ 1600’
FAIRFAX COUNTY
70 MPH
Fairfax County Population 1,109,725 (2012 Census)
INTERSTATE 495
TO MARYLA
ND
TO TYSONS CORNER
S
TA. 2
11+8
2.4
2E
ND
PR
OJE
CT
WIDENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD TC 5.11R, EXCEPT
GW
PA
RK
WA
Y
VIRGINIA
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Copyright 2014, Commonwealth of Virginia
FOR INDEX OF SHEETS SEE SHEET 1B
S
TA. 115
+75.0
0B
EGIN P
ROJE
CT
I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE PROJECT
P101, C501PROJECT #0495-029-123
P-101
C-501
PENGSTP-495-5(094)
STP-495-5(094)
105130
105130F000
1.82 1.82 PRELIM. ENG.
CONSTRUCTION1.82 1.82
--- ---
--- ---
FHWA 534 DATA 4A144
ADT (2013)
04
95-029-123
FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DRIVE
FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DR
FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DR
FR: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DRIVE
TO: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY
TO: GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY
TO: GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY
TO: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY
RIGHT OF WAY
PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING
ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE
Sta. to Sta. Approval DateReasons for Exception
Sta. to Sta. Shoulder Width Approval DateReasons for Exception
Sta. to Sta. Approval DateReasons for Exception
Sta. 122+00 to Sta. 207+00
Sta. 122+00 to Sta. 207+00
Sta. 150+00 to
Sta. 207+00
ADT (2035)
100%
4.3%
TIER 2 PROJECT
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
APPROVED
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE LOCATION AND DESIGN ENGINEER
PROGRAMMING DIVISION DIRECTOR
CHIEF ENGINEER
DATE STATE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE ENGINEER
CHIEF OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
during Peak HoursShoulder Use Lane
DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO INTERSTATE 495
100 110 12
0
130
140
150
160
170 18
0
190
200
210
220
PC
PT
PC
GE
OR
GE
TO
WN PIK
E
OL
D
DO
MIN
ON
DRIV
E
PT P
C
PT
PC
PT
PC
PT
I-495 NORTHBOUND (GS-5) - LEVEL
REDUCED NORTHBOUND LANE AND SHOULDER WIDTHS
INSIDE SHOULDER WIDTH SOUTHBOUND AT SIGN STRUCTURES
USE, OUTSIDE AND AUXILIARY LANES
HORIZONTAL SIGHT DISTANCE NORTHBOUND INSIDE SHOULDER
Widths
Barrier modification forsign structures
Varies 6’-8’
Varies 0.5’-12’Provide width for
Shoulder Use Lane
Sight Distance
495’ & 645’
109,000 (ONE WAY)
177,400 (ONE WAY)
11,000 (ONE WAY)
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
1
LOCATION MAPFAIRFAX COUNTY
0
SCALE
880’ 1760’
1A
1A
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001a.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:28:32 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
TITLE SHEET
PLAN SHEETS
1
TYPICAL SECTIONS
SURVEY ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET
CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET
DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO. STATIONS
1A LOCATION MAP
1B INDEX OF SHEETS
CADD LEVEL STRUCTURE SHEET
1BINDEX OF SHEETS
1D
3-10
1E(1) - 1E(5)
1F
2A
104+00 to 216+00
12(1) - 12(11) SIGNING PLANS
1B
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001b.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:30:43 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
SURVEY ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1D
1D
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001d.dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:32:41 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
To Convert Va. State Plane Coordinates NAD 83 Metric Values to Va. D. O. T. Project Coordinates.
Reduce the Eastings 2. 5 Million Meters and the South and North Zone Northings by 1 and 2 Million Respectively.
Multiply by the U. S. Survey Foot (3. 28083333333) .
Multiply These Values by the Combined Scale and Elevation Factor ( 1. 00006 ) for this County.
A Reverse of this Procedure will Transform VDOT Project Coordinates to NAD 83 Values.
SS 466,998.7713 3,649,265.7743100+00.00
PI 467,527.6104 3,649,546.4007105+98.68
PI 468,112.9335 3,649,818.1577112+44.02
PI 468,691.6486 3,650,098.9594118+87.26
PI 469,323.2010 3,650,492.3972126+31.34
PI 469,777.4178 3,650,871.7212132+23.11
PI 470,174.0557 3,651,241.0525137+65.08
PI 470,605.8755 3,651,655.1931143+63.39
PI 471,213.3587 3,652,113.9988151+24.67
PI 471,768.5812 3,652,418.6271157+57.97
PI 472,511.1143 3,652,671.3366165+42.33
PI 473,259.7521 3,652,872.0979173+17.42
PI 473,650.1754 3,653,106.3356177+72.72
PI 474,006.1774 3,653,455.7015182+71.51
PI 474,408.2711 3,654,120.7729190+48.68
PI 474,674.2367 3,654,584.5329195+83.30
PI 474,983.3218 3,655,113.1578201+95.65
PI 475,102.0647 3,655,691.3254207+85.89
PI 475,398.9838 3,656,038.3180212+42.58
PI 476,227.1529 3,656,269.7243221+02.47
SURVEY ALIGNMENTS
POINT STATION BEARING PROJECT COORDINATES
NORTH (Y) EAST (X) ELEV. (Z) ID.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway - Survey Baseline
272. 47’
252. 07’
243. 81’
243. 64’
262. 07’
278. 42’
291. 77’
303. 30’
300. 87’
294. 74’
285. 07’
278. 73’
267. 88’
258. 62’
234. 19’
221. 87’
207. 63’
198. 19’
186. 50’
152. 75’
0
SCALE
100’ 200’
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 13
0+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(2)
CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(1)
C1
C2
C2C1
STA. 115+75.00
BEGIN PROJECT 0495-029-123, P101, C501
LI-495 NORTHBOUND B
Curve NBB001
PI = 108+91.27
T = 891.27’
L = 1,782.31’
R = 46,043.27’
100+00.00PC =
PT = 117+82.31
Curve NBB002
PI = 131+87.79
T = 861.46’
L = 1,704.54’
R = 4,770.00’
123+26.33PC =
PT = 140+30.87
E = MATCH EXISTING E = 4.23%
V = 70 MPH
PC 10
0+0
0.0
0
100
105
110
115
PT 117
+82.3
1
120
PC 12
3+2
6.3
3
125
130
1E(1)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001e(1).dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:34:41 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
100’ 200’
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 130+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(1)
CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(2)
C2
C2
C3
C3
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 16
0+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(3)LI-495 NORTHBOUND B
Curve NBB002
PI = 131+87.79
T = 861.46’
L = 1,704.54’
R = 4,770.00’
123+26.33PC =
PT = 140+30.87
Curve NBB003
PI = 160+34.88
T = 1,163.27’
L = 2,283.06’
R = 4,830.00’
148+71.61PC =
PT = 171+54.66
E = 4.23% E = 4.18%
V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH
130
135
140
PT 14
0+3
0.8
7
145
PC 14
8+7
1.61
150
155
160
1E(2)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001e(2).dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:35:46 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
100’ 200’
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 190+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(4)
CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(3)
C3MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 16
0+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(2)
C3 C4
C4
LI-495 NORTHBOUND B
Curve NBB003
PI = 160+34.88
T = 1,163.27’
L = 2,283.06’
R = 4,830.00’
148+71.61PC =
PT = 171+54.66
Curve NBB004
PI = 186+04.22
T = 755.68’
L = 1,439.16’
R = 1,910.00’
178+48.54PC =
PT = 192+87.70
E = 4.18% E = 7.95%
V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH
160
165
170
PT 17
1+54.6
6
175
PC 17
8+4
8.5
4
180
185
190
1E(3)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001e(3).dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:37:39 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
100’ 200’
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 190+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(3)
CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(4)
C4
C5
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
20+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(5)
LI-495 NORTHBOUND B
Curve NBB004
PI = 186+04.22
T = 755.68’
L = 1,439.16’
R = 1,910.00’
178+48.54PC =
PT = 192+87.70
Curve NBB005
PI = 221+05.40
T = 922.98’
L = 1,724.11’
R = 1,950.00’
211+82.42PC =
PT = 229+06.54
C4
C5
STA. 211+82.42
END PROJECT 0495-029-123, P101, C501
E = MATCH EXISTINGE = 7.95%
V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH
190
PT 19
2+8
7.70
195
200
205
210
PC 211+8
2.42
215
220
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS1E(4)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001e(4).dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:38:39 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
100’ 200’
CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(5)
C5
C5
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
20+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 1E(4)
C5
LI-495 NORTHBOUND B
Curve NBB005
T = 922.98’
L = 1,724.11’
R = 1,950.00’
211+82.42PC =
PT = 229+06.54
E = MATCH EXISTING
V = 70 MPH
PI = 221+05.40
C4
C3
C2
C1
I-495 NORTHBOUND CONSTRUCTION BASELINE
220
225
PT 229+0
6.5
4
Ending chain 495REV2 description =============================================================================== Chord Bear = N 34° 53’ 12.82" E Ahead = N 9° 33’ 27.14" E Back = N 60° 12’ 58.50" E C.C. N 476,706.88 E 3,654,476.66 P.T. Station 229+06.54 N 476,383.10 E 3,656,399.60 P.C. Station 211+82.42 N 475,014.46 E 3,655,445.28 Mid. Ord. = 187.47 Long Chord = 1,668.50 External = 207.41 Radius = 1,950.00 Length = 1,724.11 Tangent = 922.98 Degree = 2° 56’ 17.68" Delta = 50° 39’ 31.36" (LT) P.I. Station 221+05.40 N 475,472.93 E 3,656,246.35 Curve NBBO05 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO04 to PC NBBO05 N 60° 12’ 58.50" E Dist 1,894.72 Chord Bear = N 38° 37’ 49.58" E Ahead = N 60° 12’ 58.50" E Back = N 17° 02’ 40.66" E C.C. N 472,415.60 E 3,654,749.59 P.T. Station 192+87.70 N 474,073.30 E 3,653,800.84 P.C. Station 178+48.54 N 472,975.45 E 3,652,923.49 Mid. Ord. = 133.95 Long Chord = 1,405.36 External = 144.06 Radius = 1,910.00 Length = 1,439.16 Tangent = 755.68 Degree = 2° 59’ 59.20" Delta = 43° 10’ 17.84" (RT) P.I. Station 186+04.22 N 473,697.93 E 3,653,144.99 Curve NBBO04 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO03 to PC NBBO04 N 17° 02’ 40.66" E Dist 693.88 Chord Bear = N 30° 35’ 09.55" E Ahead = N 17° 02’ 40.66" E Back = N 44° 07’ 38.43" E C.C. N 473,727.80 E 3,648,102.25 P.T. Station 171+54.66 N 472,312.05 E 3,652,720.10 P.C. Station 148+71.61 N 470,364.89 E 3,651,569.20 Mid. Ord. = 134.27 Long Chord = 2,261.86 External = 138.11 Radius = 4,830.00 Length = 2,283.06 Tangent = 1,163.27 Degree = 1° 11’ 10.49" Delta = 27° 04’ 57.77" (LT) P.I. Station 160+34.88 N 471,199.88 E 3,652,379.13 Curve NBBO03 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO02 to PC NBBO03 N 44° 07’ 38.43" E Dist 840.73 Chord Bear = N 33° 53’ 24.43" E Ahead = N 44° 07’ 38.43" E Back = N 23° 39’ 10.44" E C.C. N 466,440.28 E 3,654,407.71 P.T. Station 140+30.87 N 469,761.41 E 3,650,983.83 P.C. Station 123+26.33 N 468,353.98 E 3,650,038.42 Mid. Ord. = 75.94 Long Chord = 1,695.49 External = 77.17 Radius = 4,770.00 Length = 1,704.54 Tangent = 861.46 Degree = 1° 12’ 04.21" Delta = 20° 28’ 27.99" (RT) P.I. Station 131+87.79 N 469,143.06 E 3,650,384.04 Curve NBBO02 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO01 to PC NBBO02 N 23° 39’ 10.44" E Dist 544.02 Chord Bear = N 22° 32’ 38.24" E Ahead = N 23° 39’ 10.44" E Back = N 21° 26’ 06.04" E C.C. N 449,383.33 E 3,691,995.46 P.T. Station 117+82.31 N 467,855.66 E 3,649,820.17 P.C. Station 100+00.00 N 466,209.64 E 3,649,136.88 Mid. Ord. = 8.62 Long Chord = 1,782.20 External = 8.63 Radius = 46,043.27 Length = 1,782.31 Tangent = 891.27 Degree = 0° 07’ 27.98" Delta = 2° 13’ 04.40" (RT) P.I. Station 108+91.27 N 467,039.26 E 3,649,462.59 Curve NBBO01 *----------* Curve Data =============================================================================== Beginning chain 495REV2 description
1E(5)
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513001e(5).dgn
Plotted By: localuser1:41:33 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
RCell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(1).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:26:53 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
E
E
PROPOSED EXISTING
PLAN SYMBOL
CCTV CAMERA SITE
ITS LEGEND
OR VDOT OWNED)
TRAFFIC DETECTOR SITE (EXPRESS LANESE V
MONITORING SYSTEMFIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SHOULDER LANE 0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(1)
(1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER
CCTV-1045:
PROPOSED EXISTING
Proposed Sign Panel
Existing Sign to Remain or to be Relocated
95
I NTERSTATE
Existing Sign to be Removed
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SE
E
SH
EE
T 11(2)
SIGNS SUPPORTS
SIGN & ITS SUPPORT LEGEND
SYMBOL
Single Post Sign/ITS Support
Double Post Sign/ITS Support
O/H Cantilever Sign/ITS Support
O/H Span Sign/ITS Support
O/H Butterfly Sign/ITS Support
SIGN/ITS NOTES:
- (2) DETECTORS
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - OL:
- (1) DETECTOR
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - IL:
AND DO NOT GUARANTEE ANY LEVEL OF COVERAGE.
CAMERA LOCATIONS AND QUANTITY SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY
REQUIREMENTS OF THE RFP AND SPECIFICATIONS. SLMS CCTV
ENSURE THAT THE COVERAGE AND DETECTION MEETS THE
LOCATIONS OF THE FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR THE SLMS TO
THE DESIGN BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE
SHOULDER LANE TAPER AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT).
THE SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT TO THE END OF THE
OF THE SHOULDER USE LANE (FROM THE THEORETICAL GORE AT
FOR OBSTRUCTION AND INCIDENT DETECTION ALONG THE LENGTH
3. A SHOULDER LANE MONITORING SYSTEM (SLMS) SHALL BE PROVIDED
ANY LEVEL OF COVERAGE.
LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND DO NOT GUARANTEE
PROJECT LIMITS DURING ALL SEASONAL CONDITIONS. CCTV CAMERA
AND ALL LANE USE CONTROL SIGNALS AND DMSs WITHIN THE
CCTV CAMERA VIEWING COVERAGE OF I-495 NB AND SB TRAFFIC
2. THE DESIGN BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 100%
SIGNING AND ITS REQUIREMENTS.
INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS (PART 2 OF THE RFP) FOR ALL
THE DESIGN-BUILDER SHALL REFER TO THE RFP TECHNICAL
1. PROPOSED SIGN/ITS STRUCTURES AND LOCATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL.
- (1) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH - HOT)
- (2) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH - GP)
- (1) FIXED (POINTING NORTH)
- (1) PTZ
CCTV - 1059 (EXPRESS LANES):
Proposed Shoulder Lane Control Signal (LCS)
95
I NTERSTATE
95
I NTERSTATE
11(1)
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)
Paved P
arking
Gate
Asphalt Shoulder
Lewinsville Road -
VA
Route 694
Conc. Island
Asphalt
Conc. Slope Control Wall
Exist. FAA R/W
Exist. VDOT R/W & L/A Line
Exist. FAA R/W
Exist. FAA R/W
Exist. L/A LineL/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
C43
R=2
5.0
0’
A=3
8.3
4’
Exist. FAA R/W
Exist. FAA R/W
Exist. F
AA R/
W
Exist. FAA R/W
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
End L/A Line
End L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Comp
72.04’
+55.26
Exist. VDOT R/W & L/A Line
US Mon. Fd.225.8
7’+49.22
RM-1 Fd.228.07’+08.20
Comp152.99’+17.46 RM-1 Fd.
130.41’
+28.04
RM-1 Fd.122.32’
+61.45
Comp
166.41’
+61.59
IPF
60.0
7’
+92.2
3
US Mon. Fd.
135.17’
+20.80 Co
mp
79.5
7’
+77.5
2
Co
mp
55.5
2’
+02.5
3
Comp
167.75’
+41.84
Exist.
R/
W
IPF
188.71’
+09.33
RM-1 Fd.
139.82’
+92.61Comp
140.08’
+89.23
Comp
23.34’
+66.29
LE
WIN
SVIL
LE
RD
(Rte. 6
94)
TYP
E 1 D
MS
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 EXPRESS (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 EXPRESS (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
R
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(2).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:28:12 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
E
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(2)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SE
E
SH
EE
T 11(1)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 114
+50 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(3)
- (2) DETECTORS
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - IL:
11(2)
PC 10
0+0
0.0
0
100
101
102
103
104
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
OVE
RL
AY
SIG
N P
AN
EL
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(3).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:33:54 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(3)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 119
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(4)
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TIE INTO EXISTING
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 114
+50 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(2)
FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTHTYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
11(3)
E
TT
TCTC
TC
64
64-a
(a)
(b)
64-b
64-c
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
24
24-a
Inv. Out = 242. 37’
In Pl. 6" Plastic Pipe
In Pl. U. D.
25
63
63-a
25-a
64-d
65
64-e
Soundwall
Face Of
Soundwall
Face OfExist. R/W & L/A Line
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
S. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
N. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per V
DOT Highw
ay Plan 0
413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt Shoulder
Mile
Marker
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
RM-1 Fd.
123.82’
+36.49
RM-1 Fd.**
114.95’
+34.96
NOT HELD for Right-of Way Purposes
Note: " ** " Denotes Existing Monumentation
RM-1 Fd.
123.76’
+82.30
276
277
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
PT 117
+82.3
1
118
119
(SH
OU
LD
ER
CL
OS
ED)
ME
SS
AG
E 1
(SH
OU
LD
ER
OP
EN)
ME
SS
AG
E 2
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
B
D
C
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
(2) T
YP
E 3
DM
S
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(4).dgn
Plotted By: localuser3:04:24 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
E
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(4)
- (1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER
CCTV - 1050:
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 119
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(3)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 132
+50 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(5)
PROPOSED CCTV-1
- (1) DETECTOR
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES):
FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTHTYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND LIGHTING
- (1) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH)
- (1) FIXED (POINTING NORTH)
- (1) PTZ
CCTV - 1061 (EXPRESS LANES):
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
11(4)
S
S
S
S
S
S
Solar Panel
(2)
Elec.
Boxes
Elec. Trans.
Power S
witch
Cellular Ante
nna
Elec.
Boxes
Power Pole
26
26-a
27-a
62
62-a
27-B
Inv. Out = 233. 63’In Pl. 6" Plastic PipeIn Pl. U. D.
28
28-d
28-c28-b
28-a
293
296
295
298
297
1172
1175
1174
1173
28-e
Conc. Ditch
SoundwallFace Of
SoundwallFace Of
SoundwallFace Of
Per V
DOT Highw
ay Plan 0
413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Gate
Brush
Brush
Scotts
Run
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Oute
r Loop)
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt Shoulder
Asphalt Shoulder
Conc. Jersey Wall
Exist. R/
W
& L/
A Line
End L/A Line
End L/A Line
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A
Line End L/A Lin
e
Exist.
R/W
& L/
A Line
Comp123.41’+31.44
Co
mp
85.6
9’
+26.0
6
RM-1 Fd.336.62’+65.19
IPF
87.14’
+24.3
7
RM-1 Fd.123.75’+40.80
RM-1 Fd.
147.49’
+46.35RM-1 Fd.
126.74’
+66.47
294
296
1172
S
TCTC
TC
C
D S
EOI
EOI
EOI
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
119 12
0 121 122 123
PC 12
3+2
6.3
3
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
OL
D
DO
MINIO
N
DR
(Rte. 7
38)
OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBLB
D
C
A
B
A
C
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(5).dgn
Plotted By: localuser3:05:43 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(5)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 146+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(6)
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 132
+50 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(4)
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
11(5)
74. 50’ Lt.
+97. 26
IPF
74. 56’ Lt.
+87. 81
MONF
230. 31’ Rt.
+41. 90
IPF223. 98’ Rt.+7. 74
IPF
1462
1183
1182
1181
(a)
(b)
1178
1179
1180
1177
1176
1188
1189
29
29-a
23
23-a
1185-a
1185-b
1186
1187
(a)
(b)
(Variable Width R. O. W.)S. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O. W.)N. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
Per VDOT Highway Plan
0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A L
ine
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
S
S
140
O/
H
Sig
n
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)
Deck Rip-Rap
Asphalt Shoulder
Reflector
Reflector
Woven Wire Fence
R=4924.65’ A=155
6.22’
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A L
ine
R=4624.65’ A=892.
86’
C44Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
RM-1 Fd.
127.00’
+57.66
IRF
126.85’
+83.80
R=4624.65’ A=176.01’
Comp
126.85’
+28.51
IRF
126.82’
+61.32
1172
TC
TC
S
S
TC
TC
TC
A
B
133 13
4 135
136
137
138
139
140
PT 14
0+3
0.8
7
141
142
143
144
145
146
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
B
A
C
A
B
A
C
A F
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(6).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:43:51 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
V
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(6)
FIBER CONNECTION.
HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE
- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH
- (1) DETECTOR
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2506 IL:
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 146+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(5)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 160+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(7)
PROPOSED CCTV-2
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TIE INTO EXISTING
REMOVE EXISTING SIGN
11(6)
Soundwall
Face Of
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per V
DOT High
way Plan 0
413-02
9-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/W
& L/
A Lin
e
Per V
DOT
Hig
hway P
lan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Per VDOT
Highwa
y Plan
0413-02
9-007, R
W-2
Exist.
L/A Lin
e
Elec.
Box
Elec.
Box
Elec.
Box
Solar Panel
E E E
O/
H
Sig
nI-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)
I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)
Ramp
Asphalt Shoulder
Conc. Jersey
Wall
Sig
n
Sig
n
Grass
Gravel Shoulder
R=4624.65’ A=807.43’
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
R=1518.
01’ A
=544.4
5’
Exist. R/W
& L/
A Lin
e
R=4924.65’ A=476.63’
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
C45
R=4924.65’ A=10.79’)
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Exist. L/A Line
RM-1 Fd.62.3
4’+38.2
7
1425
E
E
TC
TC
T
TC
T
F. O.
HH
TC
146
147
148
PC 14
8+7
1.61
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 157 15
8 159 16
0
OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
B
A
C
FA
B
AC
F
A
E
EA
E
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
A
J
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(7).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:45:39 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
V
V
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(7)
- (1) DETECTOR
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2503 OL:
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 160+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(6)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 174+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(8)
PROPOSED CCTV-3
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTHTYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND LIGHTING
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TIE INTO EXISTING
TOWER
CELLULAR
- (1) PTZ ON
CCTV - 1055:
- (2) DETECTORS
IDS 2504 IL, IDS 2505 IL:
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR -
11(7)
151. 85’ Lt.+33. 06MONF
204. 29’ Lt.+51. 27MONF
1196-a
1196
1197-a
1197-b
2
3
1200-a
1200
12011202
1427
(a)
(b)
Soundwall
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0
413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Li
ne
Per V
DO
T
Hig
hway Pla
n 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. L
/A
Lin
e
Per V
DOT
Hig
hway Pla
n 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist.
R/
W
Per VDOT
Highway
Plan 041
3-029-00
7, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L
/A Line
Per VDOT Highway P
lan 0413-029-
007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per V
DOT
Highw
ay Plan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Per V
DOT Highw
ay Plan
0413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/
W
& L/
A Line
Cellular TowerT
Tele. Ped
.
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Sound Ba
rrier Wal
l
Ramp
Ramp
Ramp
Conc. Jersey Wall
Buildings
Maint.
CG-2
CG-2R=1518.01’ A=544.45’
Exist. R/W & L/A Li
ne
Exist. R/
W
& L/
A Line
Exist. R
/W
& L/
A Line
Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Exist.
R/
W
&
L/
A Lin
e
Exist. R/W & L
/A Line
N 14°30’33" E
571.99’Exist. R/W & L/A
Line
Exist. L/
A
Lin
e
RM-1 Fd.
83.53’
+46.84RM-1 Fd.
61.74’
+47.28
RM-1 Fd.
62.36’
+33.96
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
T
TC
E
TC
Hydrant
EOI
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170 171
PT 17
1+54.6
6
172 17
3 174
GE
OR
GE
TO
WN PIK
E(Rte. 193)
OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
B
A
C
A
A
C
A
B
A
E
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(8).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:46:42 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(8)
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 167+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(7)
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 188+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(9)
PROPOSED CCTV-4
FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMSFIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
SIGN AND LIGHTING
REMOVE EXISTING
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
11(8)
47. 12’
Lt.+65. 34
MONF
56. 70’
Lt.+83. 51
MONF
1427
1204
1203
1206
1205-a
1205-b
40-b
40-a
39-b
41-a
41-b
101
102
100
61
60
103
104
105
106
107
42-a
42-b
1204-a
154155
105-a
258. 26
’ Rt.+26
. 35IPF
363. 86’ Rt.
+89. 02
PPF
Conc. Ditch
Conc.
Ditch
Conc. Ditch
Soundwall
Soundwall
Soundwall
Soundwall
Face Of
Per VDOT
Highwa
y Plan
0413-0
29-007, RW-2
Exist. R/
W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT
Highway
Plan 041
3-029-00
7, RW-2
Exist. R/
W & L/A Li
ne
Per V
DOT High
way Plan 0
413-02
9-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A Line The
Limited
Access Line In T
his
Area.
Unclear
As T
o The
Locatio
n Of
The
Existin
g Hi
ghwa
y Plans
Are
Per
VDOT Highw
ay Plan
0413-029-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/W
Line
Per VDOT
Highway Pla
n 0413-
029-007
, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L
/A Line
Live Oak Drive
Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686
Asphalt Shoulder
Exist. R/W & L
/A Line
N 16°57’19"
E 281.98
’
N 14°30
’33" E
571.99’
Exist. R/
W & L/A
Line
RM-1 Fd.42.3
0’+84.8
1
EE
V
EOI
(DA
TU
R)
(DA
TU
R)
(DATUR)
174
175
176
177
178
PC 17
8+4
8.5
4
179
180 18
1 182
183
184
185
186
187
188
LIV
E
OA
K
DR
(SH
OU
LD
ER
CL
OS
ED)
ME
SS
AG
E 1
(SH
OU
LD
ER
OP
EN)
ME
SS
AG
E 2
TYP
E 2
DM
S
OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495
(CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL B
ELTWAY) NBL
AC
A
B
G
B
A
C
A
G
E
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(9).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:52:15 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
V
V
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(9)
POWER AND PROVIDE FIBER CONNECTION.
- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH HARDWIRED
- (2) DETECTORS
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2501 SB, IDS 2502 SB:
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 188+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(8)
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
02
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(10)
PROPOSED CCTV-5
(SEE SHEET NO. 11(10))
TO GEORGE WASHINGTON PARKWAY
BETWEEN I-495 NORTHBOUND AND RAMP
- RELOCATE DETECTOR TO GORE AREA
STRUCTURE
- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2523 NB:
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
FOR SLMS
FIXED CCTV CAMERAS
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
11(9)
286. 91’ Lt.
+8. 52
MONF
116. 73’ Lt.
+23. 49
IPF
42-b
110
109
59
108
58
111
112
43-a
43-b
113
114
115
116
118
119
120
121
57
122
123
124
44-a
44-b
5 6
125126
127
129
128
117-a
117-b
261. 52’ Rt.+68.
24MONF
259. 87’ Rt.
+41. 94
MONF
(a)
(b)
Conc. Ditch
Conc. Ditch
Sou
ndwall
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
S. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O. W.)
N. B. L.
Interstate 495, Capital Beltway
Per V
DOT
Hig
hway
Plan 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. R/
W
Line
Per VDOT
Highway Pla
n 0413-
029-007
, RW-2
Exist.
L/A Lin
e Per VDOT H
ighway Plan
0413-029-0
07, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line
Per VDOT H
ighway Pla
n 0413-029
-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W & L/
A Line
Trans.
Live Oak Drive
Live Oak Drive
Ramp
Sound Barrier
Wall
Dense Trees
Metal Guardrail
Metal Guardrail
E
E
E
TC
TC
TCTC
TC
TC
TC
Lig
ht
Pole
Elec.
Cab.
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
Cab.
(DATUR)
(DA
TU
R)
(DA
TU
R)
188
189
190 19
1 192
PT 19
2+8
7.7
0
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
TYP
E 1 D
MS
CA
G
A
B
C
F
G
A
B
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
F
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(10).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:56:17 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
V
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(10)
AND PROVIDE FIBER CONNECTION.
- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH HARDWIRED POWER
SIGN STRUCTURE (SEE SHEET NO. 11(9))
- (1) DETECTOR RELOCATED FROM OVERHEAD
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2523 NB:
CELLULAR TOWER
- (1) PTZ ON
CCTV - 1070:
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
02
+00 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(9)
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
16+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(11)
CELLULAR TOWER
(1) PTZ ON
CCTV - 1060:
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TIE INTO EXISTING
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND
(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH
(45 DEGREES)
TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TIE INTO EXISTING
11(10)
45-a
45-b
7 8
131130
132
133
910
11
12
11-a
134
135
136137
56 55
138
139140
46-a
46-b
141
142
143
144
47
48
291. 87’ Rt.
+34. 42
MONF
423. 86’ Rt.
+80. 38
MONF
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)(b)
Conc.
Ditch
Conc. DitchConc. Ditch
Conc. D
itch
Conc. DitchConc. Ditch
Soundwall
Soundwall
Face Of
Dense Trees
O/
H
Sig
n
Cellular
Antenna
O/
H
Sig
n
Cellular
Antenna
George W
ashington Mem
orial Parkw
ay
Deck
Deck
Sound Barrier Wall
Ramp
Metal Guardrail
Metal Guardrail
E
E
E
E E
E
E
E
E
E
T
EE
Elec.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
HH
F. O.
Wit. Post
F. O.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
Meter
Tele.
HH
Elec.
HH
E
Elec.
HH
F. O.
HH
(DA
TU
R)
(DA
TU
R)
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
PC 211+8
2.4
2
212
213 214
215
216
GE
OR
GE
WASHIN
GTON
ME
MORIA
L PK
WY
(Rte. 9
0005)
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
C
EG
A
B
C
A
B
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
E A
I
H
H
I
A
E
J
J
Cell Revised 12/11/12
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d10513012(11).dgn
Plotted By: localuser2:57:38 PM
3/7/2014
PROJECT MANAGER
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
GENERAL NOTES
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717
0495-029-123
C501495
VDOT
Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622
EXHIBIT
The LANE Team
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
V
V
0
SCALE
50’ 100’
11(11)
FIBER CONNECTION.
HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE
- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH
STRUCTURE
- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2520 OL:
FIBER CONNECTION.
HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE
- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH
STRUCTURE
- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN
RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2500 IL:
MAT
CH
LIN
E
ST
A. 2
16+0
0 S
EE
SH
EE
T 11(10)
PROPOSED CCTV-6
LANE CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS
11(11)
266. 85’ Rt.
+42. 58
(U.S.G.S.)
MONF232. 0
8’ Rt.+67. 77(U.S.G.S
.)MONF
201. 71’ Rt.
+81. 84IPF
215. 75’ Rt.
+90. 63MONFConc. Ditch
Conc. Ditc
h
Conc.
Ditch
Conc. Ditch
Conc. Ditch
Conc. Ditch
SoundwallFace Of
(Variable Width R. O
. W.)S. B. L.Interstate
495, Capital Beltway
(Variable Width R. O
. W.)N. B. L.Interstate
495, Capital Beltway
Per VDOT H
ighway P
lan 0413-0
29-007, R
W-2
Exist. R/
W & L/A Li
ne
Per VDOT
Highwa
y Plan
0413-0
29-007, RW-2
Exist.
R/W & L/A
Line
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Line
Per VDOT
Highwa
y Plan
0413-0
29-007, RW-2
Exist. L/A Lin
e
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W Line
Per V
DO
T
Hig
hway Pla
n 0413-0
29-0
07, R
W-2
Exist. L
/A
Lin
e
Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2
Exist. R/W Line
O/
H
Sig
n
Conc.
E
E
E
T
TC
TC
T
TV
Elec.
HH
Traf.
HH
Elec.
HH
TV
TC
EOI
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226 227 2
28
229
PT 229+0
6.5
4
OUTER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL
INNER LOOP
INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL
Attachment 4.2.8Offeror’s Technical Proposal Compliance
4.2.8 Technical Proposal Compliance
I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use State Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501 Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094) Contract ID Number: C00105130DB72
The Lane Construction Corporation’s Technical Proposal is fully compliant with the Design Criteria Table included in the RFP Technical Requirements (Part 2) as Attachment 2.2 and all other requirements of this RFP. The Lane Construction Corporation certifies the proposed limits of construction to include all stormwater management facilities are located within the right-of-way limits shown on the RFP Conceptual Plans with the exception of permanent and temporary easements. The Lane Construction Corporation’s design concept does not require Design Exceptions and/or Design Waivers unless they are identified or included in the RFP or Addendum(s).
14500 Avion ParkwaySuite 200
Chantilly, VA 20151703.222.5670
www.laneconstruct.com
PRICE PROPOSAL
I-495 NORTHERN SECTION
SHOULDER USEState Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501
Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094)Contract ID No.: C00105130DB72
Submitted by:
March 14, 2014
Submitted for:
ORIGINAL
14500 Avion ParkwaySuite 200
Chantilly, VA 20151703.222.5670
www.laneconstruct.com