SHOULDER SHOULDER
Dec 17, 2015
ACROMIAL SHAPEACROMIAL SHAPE TYPE 1 (FLAT)17%TYPE 1 (FLAT)17%
TYPE 2 (CURVED) 43%TYPE 2 (CURVED) 43%
TYPE 3 (ANTERIOR TYPE 3 (ANTERIOR HOOK) 40%HOOK) 40%
MORRISON & MORRISON & BIGLIANI (1987)BIGLIANI (1987)
80% PTS WITH RC 80% PTS WITH RC TEAR HAD TYPE 3 TEAR HAD TYPE 3 ACROMIONACROMION
IMPINGEMENT IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME:STAGESSYNDROME:STAGES
STAGE 1 : STAGE 1 : REVERSIBLE REVERSIBLE EDEMAEDEMA
STAGE 2: STAGE 2: FIBROSISFIBROSIS
STAGE 3: STAGE 3: ROTATOR CUFF ROTATOR CUFF TEARTEAR
IMPINGEMENT IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME :STAGE 1SYNDROME :STAGE 1
DULL ACHEDULL ACHE ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
RELATEDRELATED PALPABLE PALPABLE
TENDERNESSTENDERNESS PAIN BETWEEN PAIN BETWEEN
30-60 DEGREE 30-60 DEGREE ABDUCTIONABDUCTION
POSITIVE POSITIVE IMPINGEMENT IMPINGEMENT SIGNSSIGNS
PAIN IN PAIN IN BICIPITAL BICIPITAL GROOVEGROOVE
IMPINGEMENT IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME:STAGE 1 SYNDROME:STAGE 1
TREATMENTTREATMENT NSAIDNSAID
REST FROM PROVOCATIVE REST FROM PROVOCATIVE MANUVERSMANUVERS
PHYSICAL THERAPYPHYSICAL THERAPY
IMPINGEMENT IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME:STAGE II SYNDROME:STAGE II
DIAGNOSISDIAGNOSIS ACHING ACHING
DISCOMFORTDISCOMFORT PAIN AT PAIN AT
REST/NIGHTREST/NIGHT SUBACROMIAL SUBACROMIAL
CREPITUSCREPITUS
CATCHING CATCHING SENSATIONSENSATION
DECREASED ROMDECREASED ROM
IMPINGEMENT IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME:SYNDROME:
STAGE II TREATMENTSTAGE II TREATMENT RESTREST ICE NSAIDICE NSAID SUBACROMIAL SUBACROMIAL
INJECTIONINJECTION P.TP.T
1.R.O.M1.R.O.M
2. PAIN 2. PAIN CONTROLCONTROL
3. STRENGTH3. STRENGTH
ACROMIOPLASTYACROMIOPLASTY
86% SUCCESS IF 86% SUCCESS IF NO RC TEARNO RC TEAR
OPEN VS OPEN VS ARTHROSCOPICARTHROSCOPIC
ROTATOR CUFF TEARSROTATOR CUFF TEARS
PREVALENCEPREVALENCE ETIOLOGYETIOLOGY PHYSICAL EXAMPHYSICAL EXAM TREATMENT TREATMENT
OPTIONSOPTIONS REHABILITATIONREHABILITATION
ROTATOR CUFF ROTATOR CUFF TEARS:INCIDENCETEARS:INCIDENCE
FULL THICKNESSFULL THICKNESS
JEROSCH ,1991-JEROSCH ,1991-30.3%30.3%
NEER ,1983- 5%NEER ,1983- 5%
UHLHOFF ,1986-20%UHLHOFF ,1986-20%
WILSON, 1943-26.5%WILSON, 1943-26.5%
AGE : KEY FACTORAGE : KEY FACTOR
PARTIAL PARTIAL THICKNESSTHICKNESS
JEROSCH, 1991-JEROSCH, 1991-28.7%28.7%
YAMANKA, 1983-YAMANKA, 1983-13%13%
FUKUDA, 1980-13%FUKUDA, 1980-13%
DEPALMA, 1973-DEPALMA, 1973-37%37%
R.C TEARS: ETIOLOGYR.C TEARS: ETIOLOGY
EXTRINSIC EXTRINSIC FACTORSFACTORS
ACROMIAL SHAPEACROMIAL SHAPE
OUTLET STENOSISOUTLET STENOSIS
AC JOINT DJDAC JOINT DJD
OS ACROMIALEOS ACROMIALE
INTRINSIC INTRINSIC FACTORSFACTORS
SUPRASPINATUS SUPRASPINATUS NERVE PALSYNERVE PALSY
GLENOHUMERAL GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITYINSTABILITY
HYPOVASCULARITYHYPOVASCULARITY
AGINGAGING
R.C TEARS: DIAGNOSISR.C TEARS: DIAGNOSIS
PAINPAIN WEAKNESS(ABD/WEAKNESS(ABD/
ER)ER) CREPITUSCREPITUS DROP TESTDROP TEST BURSAL BURSAL
EFFUSIONEFFUSION
LONG HEAD LONG HEAD BICEPS RUTUREBICEPS RUTURE
DECREASED ROMDECREASED ROM
R.C TEAR : IMAGINGR.C TEAR : IMAGING
PLAIN RADIOGRAPHSPLAIN RADIOGRAPHS ULTRASONOGRAPHYULTRASONOGRAPHY ARTHROGRAMARTHROGRAM MRI: GOLD STANDARDMRI: GOLD STANDARD
ROTATOR CUFF TEAR:ROTATOR CUFF TEAR:TREATMENTTREATMENT
NON-OPERATIVENON-OPERATIVE
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
ACROMIOPLASTYACROMIOPLASTY
DISTAL CLAVICLE RESECTIONDISTAL CLAVICLE RESECTION
REPAIR OF CUFFREPAIR OF CUFF
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
ACROMIOPLASTYACROMIOPLASTY OPEN VS. ARTHROSCOPICOPEN VS. ARTHROSCOPIC
MOBILIZATION OF TENDONMOBILIZATION OF TENDON 1. BLUNT DISSECTION1. BLUNT DISSECTION 2. RELEASE FASCIAL ATTACHMENTS2. RELEASE FASCIAL ATTACHMENTS 3. INCISE CAPSULE AT GLENOID 3. INCISE CAPSULE AT GLENOID
LABRUM LABRUM
ARTHROSCOPIC ARTHROSCOPIC SUBACROMIAL SUBACROMIAL
DECOMPRESSIONDECOMPRESSION
SUBACROMIAL SPUR FINISHED ACROMIOPLASTY
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
REPAIRREPAIR
1. CREATE TROUGH1. CREATE TROUGH
2. DRILL HOLES2. DRILL HOLES
3. NON-ABSORBABLE SUTURES3. NON-ABSORBABLE SUTURES
4. SOLID DELTOID REPAIR4. SOLID DELTOID REPAIR
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR:ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR:REHABILITATIONREHABILITATION
WEEK 0-6WEEK 0-6
PASSIVE R.O.MPASSIVE R.O.M WEEK 6-12WEEK 6-12
ACTIVE R.O.MACTIVE R.O.M WEEK 12+WEEK 12+
STRENGTHENINGSTRENGTHENING
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR:ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR:RESULTSRESULTS
NEER 1988-233 PATIENTS, 4.6 NEER 1988-233 PATIENTS, 4.6 YEAR F.U.YEAR F.U.
77% EXCELLENT/GOOD77% EXCELLENT/GOOD
14% SATISFACTORY14% SATISFACTORY
9% UNSATISFACTORY9% UNSATISFACTORY
HAWKINS 1985HAWKINS 1985
86% EXCELLENT/GOOD86% EXCELLENT/GOOD
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR:ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR:RESULTSRESULTS
HARRYMAN, 1990- 112 PATIENTSHARRYMAN, 1990- 112 PATIENTS 4.7 YEAR F.U.4.7 YEAR F.U. 80% GOOD PAIN RELIEF80% GOOD PAIN RELIEF 80% REPIRS INTACT(S.S)80% REPIRS INTACT(S.S) 50% REPAIRS 50% REPAIRS
INTACT(IS,SUBSCAP)INTACT(IS,SUBSCAP) PAIN RELIEF INDEPENDENT OF PAIN RELIEF INDEPENDENT OF
CUFF INTEGRITYCUFF INTEGRITY DECOMPRESSION IS THE KEY!!DECOMPRESSION IS THE KEY!!