Route 7 WIDENING and bridge rehabilitation over dulles toll road and airport access highway sTATE pROJECT nO.: 0007-029-139, P101, R201, C501, B617, B618 FEDERAL pROJECT NO.: BR-5401 (738) cONTRACT id nO.: c00082135DB77 Submitted by: MARCH 9, 2015 Letter of submittal and attachments Volume 1 Prepared for: original
69
Embed
Volume 1 Route 7...Volume 1 Prepared for: original. Attachment 4.0.1.1 Letter of Submittal and Attachments Checklist . ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Route 7 WIDENING and bridge rehabilitation over
dulles toll road and airport access highway
sTATE pROJECT nO.: 0007-029-139, P101, R201, C501, B617, B618
FEDERAL pROJECT NO.: BR-5401 (738)cONTRACT id nO.: c00082135DB77
Submitted by:
MARCH 9, 2015
Letter of submittal and attachments
Volume 1
Prepared for:
original
Attachment 4.0.1.1 Letter of Submittal and Attachments Checklist
ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over Dulles Toll Road and Airport Access Highway
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL AND ATTACHMENTS CHECKLIST
i
Offerors shall furnish a copy of this Letter of Submittal Checklist, with the page references added, with the Letter of Submittal.
Technical Proposal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference
Page Reference
Letter of Submittal and Attachments Checklist Attachment 4.0.1.1 Section 4.0.1.1 Volume 1, i-iii
Letter of Submittal on Offeror’s letterhead NA Section 4.1.1 Volume 1, Page 1
Offeror’s official representative information NA Section 4.1.1 Volume 1, Page 1
Authorized representative’s original signature NA Section 4.1.1 Volume 1, Page 2
Declaration of intent NA Section 4.1.2 Volume 1, Page 1
120 day declaration yes Section 4.1.3 Volume 1, Page 1
Point of Contact information yes Section 4.1.4 Volume 1, Page 1
Principal Officer information NA Section 4.1.5 Volume 1, Page 2
Final Completion Date NA Section 4.1.6 Volume 1, Page 2
ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over Dulles Toll Road and Airport Access Highway
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL AND ATTACHMENTS CHECKLIST
ii
Technical Proposal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference
Page Reference
Proposal Payment Agreement or Waiver of Proposal Payment
Attachment 9.3.1 or 9.3.2
Section 4.1.7 Page 1-4
Certification Regarding Debarment Forms Attachment 11.8.6(a) Attachment 11.8.6(b) Section 4.1.8 ix
Written statement that Offeror’s proposed concept included in the Attachments to the LOS is fully compliant with the Design Criteria Table and all other requirements of the RFP
NA Section 4.1.9 Volume 1, Page 2
Certification that the proposed limits of construction are located within the right-of-way limits shown on RFP plans NA Section 4.1.9 Volume 1,
Page 2
Written statement of percent DBE participation NA Section 4.1.10 Volume 1, Page 2
Attachments to the Letter of Submittal NA Section 4.2
Confirmation that the information provided in the SOQ submittal remains true and accurate or indicates that any requested changes were previously approved by VDOT
NA Section 4.2.1 Volume 1, Page 3
Organizational chart with any updates since the SOQ submittal clearly identified NA Section 4.2.1 Volume 1,
Pages 6
Revised narrative when organizational chart includes updates since the SOQ submittal NA Section 4.2.1 N/A
Conceptual Roadway Plans – Plan View NA Section 4.2.2
Volume 2, Sheet No.
3-8
jfrederick
Typewritten Text
Appendix
jfrederick
Typewritten Text
Appendix
ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over Dulles Toll Road and Airport Access Highway
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL AND ATTACHMENTS CHECKLIST
iii
Technical Proposal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference
Conceptual Roadway Structural Plans – Transverse Section NA Section 4.2.3
Volume 2, Sheet No. 10
Conceptual Roadway Structural Plans – Abutment Configuration NA Section 4.2.3
Volume 2, Sheet No. 11
Proposal Schedule NA Section 4.2.4
Proposal Schedule NA Section 4.2.4.1
Volume 1, Page S1-
S10
Proposal Schedule Narrative NA Section 4.2.4.2 Volume 1, Page 8-15
Proposal Schedule in electronic format (CD-ROM) NA Section 4.2.4 CD-ROM
Attachment 3.6Form C-78-RFP
4.1 L
ett
er o
f sub
mit
ta
l
The Lane Construction Corporation14500 Avion Parkway, Suite 200, Chantilly, VA 20151 USA T 703.222.5670 F 703.222.5960 LaneConstruct.comAn Equal Opportunity Employer M / F /D/V
March 9, 2015
Mr. Stephen D. Kindy, P.E.Alternate Project Delivery OfficeVirginia Department of Transportation1401 East Broad StreetRichmond, Virginia 23219
RE: Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over Dulles Toll Road and Airport Access HighwayState Project No.: 0007-029-139, P101, R201, C501, B617, B618;Federal Project No.: BR-5401 (738)Contract ID Number: C00082135DB77
Dear Mr. Kindy:
The Lane Construction Corporation (LANE) is pleased to offer our Letter of Submittal for the above referenced project to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Our response contains all information requested in the Request for Proposals (RFP) and subsequent Addenda. LANE is teamed with Johnson, Mirmiran, and Thompson, Inc. (JMT) as the Lead Designer. The LANE Team has assembled committed personnel, with proven delivery of VDOT’s requirements to meet the quality, safety, and schedule demands of this Project.
4.1.1 Identification of Legal Entity Who Will Execute the Contract with VDOT: Mr. Richard A. McDonough is the authorized representative and Point of Contact for the LANE Team for all matters associated with this project.
The Lane Construction Corporation14500 Avion Parkway, Suite 200Chantilly, VA 20151
4.1.2 Offeror’s Intent: LANE’s intention is to enter into a contract with VDOT for the Project in accordance with the terms of the RFP.
4.1.3 120 Day Declaration: Pursuant to Part 1, Section 8.2, LANE declares that the offer represented by this Proposal will remain in full force and effect for one hundred twenty (120) days after the date of the Letter of Submittal and Attachments are submitted to VDOT.
4.1.4 Identification of the Point of Contact: Mr. Richard A. McDonough is the authorized representative and Point of Contact for the LANE Team.
The Lane Construction Corporation, Senior National Pursuits ManagerRichard A. McDonough14500 Avion Parkway, Suite 200Chantilly, VA 20151Tel: (703) 222-5670 Fax: (703) 222-5960Email: [email protected]
4.2 A
tta
ch
men
ts t
o t
he l
ett
er o
f sub
mit
ta
l
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 3
There are no changes from Section 3.3.2 of the SOQ
submitted to VDOT and dated June 19, 2014.
A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L 4.2 |
4.2.1 Confirmation of SOQ Information
LANE confirms all information presented in the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) remains true and accurate in accordance with Part 1, Section 11.4. As demonstrated in the organizational chart presented on the following page, the Team proposed by LANE, including but not limited to our organizational structure, lead contractor, lead designer, key personnel, and other individuals identified pursuant to Part 1, Section 4.2, will remain intact for the duration of the contract. Organizational Chart
Under the leadership of our Design-Build Manager, Mr. Kenneth K. Prince, PE, the LANE Team is structured to effectively manage and deliver the design and construction of this project. The LANE Team is organized to provide VDOT with a single-source point of contact, responsible for all design and construction activities. Our team organization has a straightforward chain of command, with individual tasks and functional responsibilities clearly identified. This organizational chart identifies key personnel and major functions to be performed for the successful management, design, and construction of the project. No changes have been made to the Offeror’s organizational structure, Lead Contractor, Lead Designer, Key Personnel or other individuals identified in the Offeror’s SOQ (dated June 19, 2014). Though reporting relationships are rigid, the lines of communication within the team will remain fluid and flexible to meet the requirements of each individual project task. In order to prevent unnecessary project delays, at times it may be prudent for other members within the LANE Team to communicate directly with their counterparts at VDOT. This will be directed and authorized in advance by Mr. Prince and the VDOT Project Manager.
Likewise, there have been no revisions made to the narrative describing the functional relationships among participants for the organizational chart. Please find this narrative below, exactly as it was submitted with our SOQ on June 19, 2014.
Functional and Reporting Relationships of Key Personnel
D-B Project Manager (DBPM), Mr. Kenneth Prince, PE (LANE) will report to VDOT and serves as VDOT’s central point of contact. He will facilitate communication among team partners and adjacent projects, monitor design efforts to proactively eliminate potential constructability issues prior to breaking ground, and delegate resources to deliver the project on time. It will be his responsibility to work with the Team to ensure that the design complies with the owner’s specifications. Mr. Prince’s management from design through construction will include weekly design and construction meetings to discuss how the Team will construct the project. Additionally, he is responsible for construction quality management and contract administration. Quality Assurance Manager, Mr. Richard Allen, PE (QCS) will report directly to the DBPM on all quality issues. Any item of work failing to meet minimum standards will be rejected and corrected immediately. Construction personnel have no authority over QA inspection staff, and issues raised by construction personnel will be resolved by Mr. Allen and the DBPM. Mr. Allen will keep VDOT informed on the status of quality of construction and issues/solutions through weekly reports and progress meetings. As QAM, Mr. Allen holds the authority to shut down the job if quality issues warrant. Quality Assurance Inspector, Mr. Craig Clatterbuck (QCS), will report directly to the QAM, and will be assigned to the project on a full-time basis for the duration of the project. Specialized Engineering will report to QCS and will perform QA testing.
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 4
Design Manager, Mr. William Schaub, PE (JMT) will report directly to the DBPM. Mr. Schaub will maintain close communication with the DBPM and will ensure the Project is completed in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. He is responsible for coordinating all design disciplines and ensuring the overall project design is in conformance with project documents; all design disciplines report directly to Mr. Schaub. He will provide VDOT with design plans for review and approval to confirm that the design work is constructable and complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents. Mr. Schaub is also responsible for establishing oversight of the QA/QC program for each design discipline of the project. He will be assisted by Mr. Bob Reed, PE who will provide an independent design QA audit. The design QC will be coordinated by Mr. Lee Priestas, PE and will be performed at the office where the work is conducted by a qualified independent staff person of each team member.
Construction Manager, Ed Pascual (LANE) will report directly to the DBPM. His daily duties include: safety, coordination of all project personnel including subcontractors, QC and QA. He holds ultimate responsibility for managing the project schedule with his staff engineer and to coordinate daily with the adjacent projects underway. He will coordinate daily meetings with the QA Lead Inspector to discuss all ongoing construction activities. He will also review all QC reports and lab results. Anything that is not meeting standards will be addressed immediately with corrective actions mandated that same day. Currently Mr. Pascual has recently completed his duties on the I-95 Express Lanes project and is currently assisting with Technical Proposals. He will available immediately upon award of this project. Mr. Pascual will hold a DEQ RLD Certification and a VDOT ESCCC prior to the commencement of construction.
Other Functional Relationships
The LANE Team also includes the following recognized specialists whom we deem critical to this Project, albeit non-key personnel as defined by the RFQ; their qualifications are provided below.
Design QA – Mr. Bob Reed, PE (JMT) and Design QC – Lee Priestas, PE (JMT) will report directly to the Design Manager. With more than 35 years’ experience apiece, they are both thoroughly familiar with VDOT QA/QC Guidelines and the complete design process related to transportation projects. Mr. Reed is JMT’s Design QC Manager for Route 3 Widening D-B and Project Manager for the Final Design of Jones Branch Connector in Tysons for Fairfax County and VDOT. He has assisted VDOT with D-B projects including Sycolin Road overpass of Route 7/15 Bypass, Pacific Blvd, and Battlefield Blvd. Mr. Priestas previously served as the Director of Public Works/County Engineer for Henrico County in charge of quality for all projects. He has extensive experience in traffic control devices (signs, signals, and pavement markings), roadway design, as well as traffic control for work areas and special events.
Public Relations Manager – Ms. Susan Sharp (Sharp & Co.), will report directly to the DBPM. Ms. Sharp has over 35 years of professional experience in strategic planning, electronic and print information, communication and marketing, information architecture, creation and implementation of effective communication strategies, marketing communications, and public involvement. She will provide public involvement/relations and assist the Team with stakeholder coordination and public participation activities. She and the DBPM will work at the direction of VDOT to develop and implement a public participation program which may include conducting both public information and individual one-on-one meetings, developing and updating a project website, preparing monthly project mailers, and securing media coverage.
The following design professionals will report directly to Mr. Schaub, the Design Manager.
Rodney Hayzlett, PE
Roadway
20 yrs. experience in the management and design of advanced technical urban and rural roadway projects in VA; ranging from minor improvements to reconstruction and widening of interstate-type roadways including major drainage improvements. PM on Route 7 Phase 1 & 2 and Project Engineering on Fairfax County Parkway D-B.
Trip Phaup, PE Structures
25 yrs. experience in the analysis, design, and preparation of preliminary and final plans, special provisions, and construction cost estimates for a variety of highway, railway, and miscellaneous structures. PM on VDOT’s Route 61 Bridge Replacement and Structural
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 5
QA/QC on the Fairfax County Parkway.
Randy Boice, PE Traffic/TMP
22 yrs. experience in traffic engineering, highway and traffic signal system design, and traffic management system analysis and design, and the design of communications systems between central operations centers and field equipment. Senior Traffic Engineer on several VA projects including Route 7, North Area Roads, & Fairfax County Parkway.
Dave Malinoski, PE
Utilities
34 yrs. experience in the management and design of utility, transportation and site improvement projects. Experience includes utility conflict analysis, scheduling and in-plan design deliverables for numerous utilities. Has provided services for interstate, arterial and secondary roadways constructed including LANE’s I-495 Express Lanes project.
Scott Rasmussen, PLA Bicycle/Pedestrian
22 yrs. experience in landscape architecture including landscape studies, aesthetic analysis and environmental planning. His expertise relates to recreational planning and design, pedestrian and bicycle planning, as well as landscape architecture specific to transportation facilities. PLA on the DDOT 11th Street Corridor and Route 7 Phase 1 & 2 projects.
The following construction professionals will report directly to Mr. Pascual, the Construction Manager.
Dennis Rodkey Roadway
Superintendent
33 yrs. experience transportation related projects. Roadway Superintendent on numerous VDOT jobs including I-95 Express Lanes. Worked with DBPM on Dulles Metrorail and North Area Roads projects and is extremely familiar with roadway construction in Tysons.
Les Burdett Structures
Superintendent
42 yrs. of experience in the construction industry. Responsible for the construction of bridges, retaining walls, noise walls and miscellaneous structure work. Worked with CM on the Rt. 7 corridor for the I-495 Express Lanes as a Structures Superintendent.
Mike Leitch MOT Manager
8 yrs. of construction experience. Ensures all MOT operations are in accordance with approved plans and contract documents, reviews MOT designs, plans the MOT installations, supervises multiple MOT crews, and coordinates with the adjacent projects, stakeholders, and Owner. MOT Manager on I-95 Express Lanes and Asst. MOT Manager on I-495 Express Lanes.
Wayne Lindsay Utility Manager
30 yrs. experience in heavy civil roadway construction. Coordinates with all respective utility companies, ensures strict compliance of all SCC regulations, and handles utility relocations. Utility Manager on I-95 Express Lanes and I-495 Express Lanes.
Tom Alexander SUP
Superintendent
35 yrs. of experience in the construction industry; Responsible for the hands-on, day-to day construction of the shared use paths, pedestrian tunnels, and all associated components; Structures/Bridge Superintendent on I-95 Express Lanes, I-495 Express Lanes, Woodrow Wilson Bridge, and WMATA Blue Line Extension.
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 6
The following design professionals will report directly to Mr. Schaub, the Design Manager.
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 7
4.2.2 Conceptual Roadway Plans
The Conceptual Roadway Plans showing the general Project layout are included in Volume 2. They include copies of (a) plan view indicating the number of lanes specified in the RFP Information Package, and (b) typical sections of the proposed improvements to Route 7. The Conceptual Roadway Plans meet the requirements of the Design Criteria Table (Attachment 2.2 of Part 2) and indicate that the limits of construction are within the existing/proposed right-of- way limits shown in the RFP Conceptual Plans.
4.2.3 Conceptual Bridge Plans
The Conceptual Bridge Plans showing the type, size and location for the proposed new bridge are included in Volume 2. Copies of an elevation view, transverse section, and abutment and pier configurations have been provided. The Conceptual Bridge Plans meet all applicable geometric requirements of VDOT’s Structure and Bridge Manual, in Volume V, Part 2.
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 8
4.2.4 Proposal Schedule and Narrative
The LANE Team has thoroughly evaluated the RFP documents, performed numerous site visits, attended the pre-proposal meeting, participated in proprietary meeting discussions, and held numerous working sessions amongst our design and construction teams in order to plan the most safe and efficient method for completing this important project. Through this progression, we have developed a solution to deliver the Project as outlined on or ahead of schedule. This narrative explains how we will deliver a highly successful Project to VDOT and to the satisfaction of all stakeholders.
4.2.4.1 Proposal Schedule
The Proposal Schedule is located at the end of this section.
4.2.4.2 Proposal Schedule Narrative
The LANE Team has developed the Proposal Schedule narrative illustrating our overall plan to successfully execute the work in accordance with the contract documents. The narrative provides an overall description of the key milestones, including the design and construction activities as well as construction phasing and sequencing. The Critical Path and relative assumptions are also discussed.
KEY MILESTONES The LANE Team is committed to a completion date of September 1, 2017. The table below identifies Key Milestone dates, which in order to be met, will require coordination not only between the Design Build Team and VDOT but also other reviewing agencies (WMATA, MWAA) as well as the entire Tysons community. Post Project award, The LANE Team, comprised of experienced team members, will implement our assertive design-build approach and local experience and relationships to potentially improve these dates.
Key Milestone Milestone Date
Notice of Intent to Award April 20, 2015
CTB Approval / Notice of Award May 20, 2015
Design-Build Contract Execution June 18, 2015
Notice to Proceed June 25, 2015
Scope Validation Period Complete October 22, 2015
Start of Construction November 4, 2015
Final Completion Date September 1, 2017
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 9
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS) The WBS is a multi-level, hierarchical arrangement of the Work to be performed on the Project. The LANE Team has laid out the WBS to break down the major phases of the Project by design area, type of work, and phasing.
The WBS Areas for the Project have been developed as a collaborative effort between the design and construction teams by looking at the Project as a whole, including the Type of Work along the alignment(s), in addition to design considerations and management of the construction efforts. Levels 2 and 3 of the WBS depicted in the Proposal Schedule include the following items:
o Scope Validation Period: includes the Scope Validation Period activity for the Project. o Environmental/Permitting: comprises the activities required to obtain the necessary
environmental permits such as Water Quality, stormwater monitoring, and noise evaluations. o ROW Acquisition: details the acquisition process for the ROW required including title
research, appraisals, appraisal reviews, offers, and negotiations. o Design: includes preliminary engineering services, plan development, QA/QC review, VDOT,
MWAA and WMATA review and approval of the plans. This section includes additional levels to the WBS - grouping the design activities by type of design submission packages including Geotechnical, Structures, and Roadway.
o Utility Coordination and Relocations: includes the activities for UFI meetings, preparation of preliminary engineering (PE) estimates, approval of PE estimates, utility relocation design by utility owner, approval of the utility design, and relocation of utilities for construction.
o Construction: includes all the components of the roadway and bridge construction, including but not limited to MOT, erosion & sediment controls, QA/QC, stormwater management, signals, drainage, lighting, and bridge and roadway improvements. This section has been further subdivided into construction phases.
CALENDARS Seven project calendars are used in the Schedule and include:
1. “7-Day” – Based on seven days per week and is used for review periods and milestones. 2. “5-Day Admin” – Based on five working days per week and includes holiday restrictions. Used for
design activities and work not impacted by adverse weather. 3. “5-Day Typical” – Based on five working days per week, holiday restrictions, and anticipated
weather days. Used for construction activities. 4. “5-Day Concrete” – Based on five working days per week, holiday restrictions, anticipated weather
with non-working periods from December through February.
Rte 7
Design Procurement Construction
ROW Acquisition
Environ / PermitsRoadway Utility
RelocatesScope
Validation Phase I Phase IIIPhase II Shared Use Path
Rdwy
Bridge
Rdwy
Bridge
Rdwy
Bridge
By Quardant
Retaining Walls
Bridge
Drainage
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 10
5. “Weekend” – Based on a weekend closure (9pm Friday to 5am Monday) 6. “5-Day Asphalt Paving – Base/Interim Courses” – Based on the 5-Day Typical with non-working
periods from December through February. 7. “5-Day Asphalt Paving – Surface Course”– Based on the 5-Day Typical with non-working
periods from November through March. ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION The Proposal Schedule activity identification number is based on a ‘smart’ activity identification in which a unique alphanumeric is utilized. Each activity identification is broken down into four parts identifying Location, Phase, Work Element, and a unique identifier, described in detail below. An example is 000-MS-9020.
A. Location - The first digit in the activity identification number pertains to the location with
the abbreviation and order as follows:
• 0 - Route 7 Widening • D - Design Engineering • Q - Quality Assurance/Quality Control • 1 - Phase 1 Construction • 2 - Phase 2 Construction • 3 - Phase 3 Construction • S - Shared Use Path Construction
B. Work Element - Letters second and third in the activity identification number pertain to the
types of work with the abbreviations as follows:
• MS - Milestone • P - Procurement (Shop Drawings / Fabrication / Delivery) • RW - Right-of-Way • EV - Environmental • GD - Geotechnical Design • RD - Roadway Design • SD - Structures Design • PI - Public Involvement • UT - Utility Relocation • IT - QA/QC Inspection & Testing • R - Roadway Construction • B - Bridge Construction • NW - Northwest Quadrant • NE - Northeast Quadrant • SW - Southwest Quadrant • SE - Southeast Quadrant
C. Unique Identifier -The last four digits in the activity identification structure are numeric
increments starting with ten, and incremented in steps of ten. This is done to leave ample room between activities so that additional activities may be inserted as necessary.
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 11
PLAN AND STRATEGY DESIGN The design phase includes preparation, QA/QC reviews, and submission of Intermediate, Final, and Ready for Construction (RFC) design stages of the Project. Included are the 21-day periods for VDOT, Fairfax County, MWAA, and FHWA review and approval as well as a 30-day period for WMATA reviews. Survey coordination and mapping and utility designations are included to support the plan preparation. Additional activities are included for geotechnical investigations, reports, and a 21-day period for VDOT’s review of the geotechnical reports prior to our submission of the final roadway packages. Hold Points such as environmental permit approvals and subsequent release by the VDOT Project Manager have been built into the design schedule. Our team has made the decision to begin design immediately upon Notice of Intent to Award to begin advancing the concept plans to the intermediate stage. Design efforts for the respective project elements are on the critical path.
Environmental Permitting Our baseline schedule will contain all necessary environmental and permitting activities as required. All permitted construction activities will be a hold point to ensure no work is performed without the appropriate permits in place. Additional hold points will also exist for ROW Authorization (EQ-201) and our Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) approval for coverage under the Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) General Construction Permit.
ROW Acquisition There are only minor Right-of-Way acquisitions and easements planned for this project which have been included; these are not expected to affect the schedule since the majority of the project construction is contained in existing Right-of-Way.
Utility Relocations To advance the relocation of utilities as seamlessly as possible, the LANE Team will meet early on with all affected utility owners to develop and confirm our understanding of how both the Project and utility owner goals will align with the project schedule. We will conduct early coordination with all utility owners including completion of UT9 Forms, defining right-of-way, “prior rights”, and establishing the relocation/reconstruction expectations and costs. We have identified key milestones including meeting with the VDOT Regional Utility Manager, the required Utility Field Inspection meeting, and sequenced utility relocations to match the required work operations for the Project in the project schedule. Due to the extent of utility relocations and the fast-pace construction schedule, we will have some concurrent construction and utility relocation work within the same proximity. The LANE Team will at all times adhere to the Utility Manual of Instructions; Utility Relocation Policies & Procedures Manual (Utility Manual). In addition, it will be the DB’s responsibility to coordinate the utility relocation with MWAA for utilities that may be attached to the rehabilitated bridge.
QA/QC Inspection & Testing QA/QC activities will be performed as required in the contract documents and relevant tasks are included in our proposal schedule:
1. QA/QC Plan Submittal 2. QA/QC Plan Presentation 3. QA/QC review of design packages 4. Preparatory Inspection Meetings 5. Witness and Hold Points 6. VDOT Inspections
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 12
CONSTRUCTION Critical Path The Route 7 Widening Project will improve the structurally deficient twin bridges spanning the Dulles Toll Road and Airport Access Highway. The project will ensure the bridges and shared use path meet the current design standards. To ensure the project is completed by the contractual deadline of September 1, 2017 the critical path for the project is as follows:
• Development and Approval of the Stage I TS&L Preliminary Bridge Design • Submission and Approval of Structural Steel Shop Drawings • Fabrications and Delivery of Structural Steel Girders • Construction of Phase I – Westbound Superstructure (partial) • Construction of Phase II – Eastbound Structure • Construction of Phase III – Completion of Westbound Structure
KEY ASSUMPTIONS The LANE Team has made the following key assumptions upon which the Proposal Schedule is based: Interaction and Interface with the Owner Timely and effective communication between LANE, VDOT, MWAA and WMATA as well as all other stakeholders is integral to the success of the Project throughout design and construction. Co-location of key team members and a structured system of coordination meetings will enhance the ability of the team to make rapid decisions in coordination with VDOT and identification of issues early through open communication. Because of multiple agency reviews, extensive coordination will be required to gain submittal approvals in a timely manner.
Work Hours, Overtime Work, and Additional Shifts The LANE Team will work both single shifts and multiple shifts as necessary for various construction activities. As per the RFP, we do not have extended ramp or lane closures built into our schedule.
SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT Through our experience gained by successfully delivering challenging design-build roadway projects on-time, the LANE Team has developed scheduling protocols to govern the development, implementation, updating, and recovery of the CPM schedule through each of the Project’s phases. These methods have proven effective as evidenced by the fact that every design-build project by our team has finished either on-time or ahead of schedule.
Open and honest communication leads to effective coordination. The Project Schedule is the primary means for the LANE Team to communicate the design and construction plan to the Team, VDOT, and stakeholders. It includes planned means and methods, sequencing, resource utilization, and timing. The schedule provides the framework for planning and scheduling the day-to-day work. The schedule is the critical tool used to monitor and measure progress for the Project.
Development For any design-build project it is imperative that the project team develops a detailed CPM schedule that considers the interrelationships among all the of the design-build disciplines. The LANE Team has developed the Proposal Schedule that includes a WBS to clearly delineate the respective tasks of each discipline manager, including design, environmental permitting, right-of-way, utilities, and construction.
In order to prepare the Baseline Schedule, each discipline team will be responsible for producing a schedule to govern their own respective work elements and provide insight into how their schedule activities affect and are affected by activities in other areas of the Project. The Design-Build Project Manager (DBPM) will hold schedule development meetings attended by all disciplines, including the Design Manager (DM) and
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 13
Construction Manager (CM) to review the individual discipline schedules and integrate them into the overall project schedule. These meetings ensure that:
• The work packages for the Project are comprehensive enough to define the work with all activities delineated
• The work packages are integrated within the Project and among each of the disciplines to generate a clearly defined critical path, confirm that the critical path is both logical as well as feasible, and that the schedule shows that the Project will complete on-time or ahead of schedule.
• Each discipline manager understands the schedule(s) of their counterparts and how their work inter-relates with the other elements.
• Each discipline manager understands how their respective work affects the overall critical path of the Project and the priorities of the DBPM and other discipline managers.
• The schedule meets the requirements of the Contract. These meetings enable the LANE Team to create a Proposal Schedule that has been jointly prepared and agreed to by all of the discipline managers, providing realistic expectations of the schedule of work to be completed by all team members and third parties during the course of concurrent activities on the Project.
Implementation The Proposal Schedule will be updated and submitted to VDOT within 15 days of Notice to Proceed as our Preliminary Schedule. The Baseline Schedule will be finalized and submitted to VDOT within 90 calendar days of Notice to Proceed. The Baseline Schedule will include cost and resource loading, all submittals required by the Contract Documents as well as a definitive critical path. Key personnel representing all disciplines (design, construction, safety, quality, controls, and procurement) will engage and actively begin in-depth planning of the project activities and refinement to the schedule.
Throughout the design phase of the Project, as more detailed plans are developed and utility conflicts are verified, schedule meetings will continue to be held in order to further develop the Baseline Schedule. This schedule will be utilized by all Team members to plan and track the progress of their work. It will be submitted to VDOT for review and approval, and implemented during the planning phases for utilities, right-of-way, design, and subcontractor/supplier scope and purchasing.
A three (3) week look ahead schedule will be prepared and weekly meetings conducted with participation from all disciplines to track progress as well as determine areas of work where modifications or re-sequencing needs to be developed. Specific milestones dates from the schedule will be written into subcontracts and purchase orders, making these entities contractually responsible for meeting schedule deadlines.
Updating Process Each month starting with the month following Notice to Proceed, the Preliminary Schedule will be updated as the LANE Team prepares, submits, and receives approval on the Baseline Schedule. Once the Baseline Schedule is approved, it will be updated and submitted to VDOT for approval monthly until Final Completion of the Project. Each update will be accompanied with a narrative report and tables as prescribed in the Design-Build Project Schedule special provision. The updated schedule and narrative will reflect:
• Activities started or completed during the period • Actual start and finish dates • Activities on-going during the period • Remaining duration for on-going activities • Modified relationships to correct out-of-sequence progress • Modified relationships to reflect the LANE Team’s plan to complete the remaining work • Change Orders • Relief Events • Compensation Events
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 14
The Scheduling Engineer under the guidance of the DBPM will coordinate the progress updates each month. Updates will be provided by the discipline managers (engineering, utility coordinator, procurement, permit, quality, and construction managers) inclusive of input from the staff engineers. Progress performance will be reviewed and monitored by our DBPM (and VDOT), to identify current or potential schedule issues and recommended mitigation measures.
The schedule will be constantly reviewed and maintained as part of the monthly updating process. Systems used to manage the design and construction sequencing will be clear and concise including:
• Weekly design/construction scheduling and coordination meetings during the design phases • Utility relocation tracking sheets during both the design and construction phases, ROW progress
tracking sheets during both the design and construction phases • Weekly construction scheduling and coordination meetings during the construction phases • Show drawing status tracking sheets • Material submittal and delivery schedules • Non-conformance logs by QC and QA for both design and construction • RFI logs • Regular coordination meetings with our DBPM, DM, CM and disciple leaders • Monthly internal project review meetings by the LANE Team’s Executive Review Committee • Monthly progress/partnering meetings with the major stakeholders.
Weekly Planning/Coordination Meetings In addition to the monthly updates, the LANE Team, at a minimum, will hold weekly Design Scheduling/Coordination Meetings that are run by the DBPM and attended by both the design and construction team managers. Design Scheduling/ Coordination Meetings have been a central tool on our design-build projects to facilitate face-to-face communication between the design and construction managers. For each meeting, the DBPM will review the CPM schedule and identify all activities that were scheduled for completion the previous week or planned for the next two weeks. During these meetings, the Project Team discusses the progress since the last meeting with actual dates for completed activities; critical completion dates for future activities; the addition or deletion of schedule activities as the design evolves; the impact of revised schedule dates on other activities and disciplines; identification of ways to advance the schedule ahead of the planned completion or to mitigate schedule impacts; and general design review, constructability, and determination of means and methods.
After each weekly meeting, the Schedule Engineer will update the CPM schedule and forward copies of an updated “look-ahead” schedule DBPM, DM, CM, and each of the discipline managers identifying the critical dates agreed to during the weekly coordination meeting. This process continues throughout the design period to ensure there is no slippage in the start of utility relocation and construction phases of the Project.
During the utility relocation and construction phases of the Project, the DBPM, CM, DM, Schedule Engineer, QA Manager, QC Manager, and VDOT will continue to meet weekly for a Construction Scheduling/Coordinating Meeting to coordinate necessary QA, QC, Independent Assurance and Independent Verification inspections. At each meeting, the CM will review the work performed during the previous week and outline the schedule activities that will be performed during the forthcoming two weeks.
At the internal weekly meetings, issues/concerns will be identified utilizing the tracking aids previously mentioned. Action items will be identified and assigned to the responsible party who can resolve it. Three-week “look-ahead schedules” will be prepared and discussed to analyze schedule and quantity impacts. Similar information will be discussed and action items assigned at the Monthly Progress/Partnering meetings with key stakeholders. Other stakeholders may be invited as required for anticipated issues during the upcoming schedule activities.
Route 7 Widening and Bridge Rehabilitation over DTR and AAH
4 . 2 A T T A C H M E N T S T O T H E L E T T E R O F S U B M I T T A L Page | 15
Schedule Recovery Process If during the course of the Project, changes or unforeseen circumstances arise that impact the project schedule, the LANE Team will immediately notify VDOT (and other appropriate stakeholders) and complete a Time Impact Analysis (TIA) and prepare a schedule recovery plan to recover lost time. This plan may include increasing work shifts, adding crews and resources to construct critical path activities concurrently, changing MOT schemes and/or modifying the design to remove activities from the critical path. Schedule recovery may require adjustments by any or all of the discipline managers including: design, permitting, right-of-way, utility relocation, and construction. In the event all other design-build disciplines have completed their tasks, re-sequencing the construction schedule by the Construction Manager will be the primary focus to mitigate impacts.
SUMMARY The LANE Team has developed a Proposal Schedule and Narrative that demonstrates our understanding of the complexities and interrelationships of both the technical elements as well as the distinct elements of the Project. Additionally, our Proposal Schedule takes into account internal plan reviews, VDOT plan reviews and approvals, environmental permitting, ROW acquisitions, utility relocations, and construction activities.
The LANE Team is committed to continuously improve the enclosed Proposal Schedule to better serve VDOT, associated stakeholders, and the traveling public. Upon issuance of NTP, all team members will actively work to make this Project a success for VDOT and the citizens of Virginia.
Activity ID Activity Name OriginalDuration
Start Finish
Route 7 Widening & Bridge Rehab over Dulles Toll RdRoute 7 Widening & Bridge Rehab over Dulles Toll RdRoute 7 Widening & Bridge Rehab over Dulles Toll RdRoute 7 Widening & Bridge Rehab over Dulles Toll RdRoute 7 Widening & Bridge Rehab over Dulles Toll Rd0-MS-0010 Submission of Letter of Submittal - March 9, 2015 0 09-Mar-15
0-MS-0020 Submission of Price Proposal - April 9, 2015 0 09-Apr-15*
0-MS-0030 Open Price Proposal - April 13, 2015 0 13-Apr-15*
0-MS-0040 Notice of Intent to Award - April 20, 2015 0 20-Apr-15*
0-MS-0050 CTB Approval / Notice of Award - May 20, 2015 0 20-May-15*
0-MS-0060 Design-Build Contract Execution - June 18, 2015 0 18-Jun-15
0-MS-0070 Notice To Proceed - June 25, 2015 0 25-Jun-15*
0-MS-0080 Final Completion - September 1, 2017 0 01-Sep-17*
VDOT & Others Review of Stage II Final Bridge Design
Released for Construction (RFC) Bridge Design Approved
Submit Load Rating Report For Each Stage of Construction
Submit Bridge Unit Cost Data Within 90 days of VDOT Approval of Construction Plans
Submit Final, As-Built Load Rating Report for Each New Structure
Develop Stage I (TS&L) Preliminary Retaining Wall Design & Submit
Receive VDOT & Others Review Comments and Approval to Advance to Stage II Final Design
Develop Stage II Final Retaining Wall Design & Submit
VDOT & Others Review of Stage II Final Retaining Wall Design
Released for Construction (RFC) Retaining Wall Design Approved
Develop Existing Sign Inventory Plan
Develop Photometric Lighting Analysis and Calculations and Submit to VDOT
VDOT & Others Review & Approval of Photometric Lighting Analysis and Calculations
Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS, MOT Plans and Draft TMP-Preliminary Submittal
VDOT & Others Review Preliminary Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS, MOT Plans and Draft TMP Plans
WMATA Review Preliminary Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS, MOT Plans and Draft TMP Plans
Address Preliminary Review Comments, Submit Final Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS, MOT, and Fina
VDOT & Others Review Final Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS, MOT Plans and Draft TMP Plans
Route 7 Widening Bridge Rehab over Dulles Toll Rd
Remaining Level of Effort Remaining Work Critical Remaining Work Milestone Page 3 of 10
S-3
Activity ID Activity Name OriginalDuration
Start Finish
D-TE-0090 WMATA Review Final Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS, MOT Plans and Draft TMP Plans30 10-Dec-15 08-Jan-16
D-TE-0100 Address Final Review Comments and Receive VDOT approval on RFC Signing, Pavement Marking, Lighting, Signal Design, ITS,30 17-Dec-15 29-Jan-16
sTATE pROJECT nO.: 0007-029-139, P101, R201, C501, B617, B618FEDERAL pROJECT NO.: BR-5401 (738)cONTRACT id nO.: c00082135DB77
Submitted by:
MARCH 9, 2015
Letter of submittal and attachments
Volume 2 - PLANS
Prepared for:
Existing R/W
RA
MP I
RA
MP
H
RAMP F
AC
CE
SS
HIG
HW
AY -
EB
L
DU
LLE
S IN
T'L AIR
PO
RT
DU
LLE
S
TOLL R
OA
D (R
OU
TE 267) -
EB
L
1
0007 - 029 - 139
Leesburg Pike - VA Route 7
and Toll R
oad
Dulles
Air
port
Access
Westw
ood
Center Drive
Tyco Road
0007-029-139
7
Parsons Brin
ckerhoff, Inc.
DHV
V (MPH)
STATE LINECOUNTY LINECITY,TOWN OR VILLAGERIGHT OF WAY LINEFENCE LINEUNFENCED PROPERTY LINEFENCED PROPERTY LINEWATER LINESANITARY SEWER LINEGAS LINEELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLETRAVELED WAYGUARD RAILRETAINING WALLRAILROADSBASE OR SURVEY LINE
LEVEE OR EMBANKMENTBRIDGESCULVERTSDROP INLETPOWER POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH LINESHEDGETREESHEAVY WOODSGROUND ELEVATIONGRADE ELEVATION
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
30
30
+50
DATUM LINE
DATUM LINE
173
175
T/Tg
E
6" W
8" S
4" G
PLPL
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PLAN AND PROFILE OF PROPOSED
STATE HIGHWAY
Fr:
To:
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND TRAFFIC DATA
D (%) (design hour)
T (%) (design hour)
1
WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED.
THE ORIGINAL APPROVED TITLE SHEET(S), INCLUDING ORIGINAL
SIGNATURES, ARE FILED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY.
ANY MISUSE OF ELECTRONIC FILES, INCLUDING SCANNED SIGNATURES,
IS ILLEGAL AND ENFORCED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW.
ALL CURVES ARE TO BE SUPERELEVATED, TRANSITIONED AND
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION
AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT.
THIS PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FOR SECTION NUMBERS)
(SEE TABULATION BELOW
Arif
ur Rah
man, P
E (7
03) 259-1940 (N
OV
A)
STATE
PROJECT
NO.
SECTIONEQUALITIES
FEET
LENGTH INCLUDINGFEDERAL AID
PROJECT NO.FEET FEETMILES MILES
LENGTH EXCLUDINGTYPE
DESCRIPTIONBRIDGE(S) BRIDGE(S)TYPE
CODE
UPC
NO.
BRIDGE
NO.
AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, 2009 MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENT TO
THE MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND AS
AMENDED BY CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC
PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY.
DEPARTMENT'S 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, 2008 ROAD
Cell Revised 12/11/12
SIGNATURES AND THE OFFICIAL PLAN ASSEMBLY IN ELECTRONIC
AS AWARDED, HAS BEEN SEALED AND SIGNED USING DIGITAL
FORMAT IS STORED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY,
INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS, WILL BE THE OFFICIAL
CONSTRUCTION PLANS. FOR INFORMATION RELATIVE TO ELECTRONIC
FILES AND LAYERED PLANS, SEE THE GENERAL NOTES.
THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY
SECTION NUMBERS)
BELOW FOR
(SEE TABULATION
Population Fairfax County - 1,081,726 (2010 Census)
Project Lengths are based on Route 7 Construction B/L.
0007-0
29-139
6003000
SCALEJarrett V
alley Drive
3 4
5 6 7 8
Woolpert, Inc. - F
ebruary 6, 2
013
Woolpert, Inc. - J
anuary 22, 2
013
Urban Principal Arterial (GS-5) - Rolling - 50/40 MPH Design Speed
Georgetown Pike (Rte. 193)
Dulles Toll Road (Rte. 267)
53,000
3,816
60/40
2%
Fr:
To:
60,000
4,320
60/40
2%
Dulles Toll Road (Rte. 267)
Tysons Corner (Rte. 123)
ADT (2012)
ADT (2036)
P-101
R-201
B617
B618
C-501
X271
X271
82135
82135
82135
N/A
N/A
0.4018
0.4018
0.3190
0.3190 Prelim. Eng.
PROJECT
Right-of-Way
Bridge
Bridge
Construction
189-08B
189-08B
PLAN
82135
82135
PENG
ROWA
I000
FHWA 534 DATA 4E113
525
515
520
530
535
540
545
550
0007-029-139, P101, C501
ST
A 522
+31.74
BE
GIN P
ROJE
CT
ST
A 543
+53.0
3
EN
D
PR
OJE
CT
Station 552+08.85
Tyco Road
Description Reference:
N/A
N/A
N/A
2121.29
437.06
437.06
2121.29
0.0828
0.0828
1684.23
-
-
-
-
B617
B618
TO: 0.162 MILE WEST OF TYCO RD.
FR: 0.564 MILE WEST OF TYCO RD.
GEOPAK Computer Identification No. 82135
DESIGN PACKAGE (GEOPAK).
THIS PROJECT WAS DEVELOPED UTILIZING THE DEPARTMENT'S ENGINEERING
**
Old
Ash Grove
Sterling
0.3959
TO: 0.090 MILE WEST OF TYCO RD.
FR: 0.571 MILE WEST OF TYCO RD.
Tysons Corner
STATEFEDERAL AID STATE
PROJECT PROJECTROUTE
VA.
PROJECT SHEET NO.
VIRGINIA
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
SHEET
NO.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Copyright 2014, Commonwealth of Virginia
FOR INDEX OF SHEETS SEE SHEET 1B
d82135001.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY
9:25:37 AM
d82135001.dgn
1P
ROJE
CT
MA
NA
GE
R
SU
RV
EY
ED
BY,
DA
TE
DE
SIG
N
BY
SU
BS
UR
FA
CE
UTILIT
Y
BY,
DA
TE
6D
6C
WIDENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD TC-5.11 ULS, EXCEPT
1684.23
ST
A 522
+04.9
2
BE
GIN P
ROJE
CT
EN
D
PR
OJE
CT
ST
A 547+3
2.4
6
0007-029-139, R201
2527.54 0.4787 2090.48
BR-5401 ( )
72,260 81,800
BR-5401 (738)
BR-5401 (738)
CARRIES RTE. 7 WB OVER DATR
CARRIES RTE. 7 EB OVER DATR
FAIRFAX COUNTY
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
RA
MP I
RAMP F
RAMP G
RAM
P E
RA
MP
D
RAMP C
RA
MP
B
RAMP A
RA
MP
H
intersection with Jarrett Valley Drive. with Jarrett Valley Drive and 40 MPH on Route 7 east of the * The design speed shall be 50 MPH on Route 7 west of the intersection
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
5C
project, as shown on the RFP Conceptual Plans provided by VDOT.
retaining walls to be contained within the proposed right of way provided for the
The LANE Team's concept allows for the proposed roadway, shared-use-paths, and
and other related technical communications from VDOT.
criteria shown on Table 2.2, and other requirements of this RFP, the Addendum,
shown fully complies with the RFP Technical Requirements (Part 2), including the
geometry of the roadway and shared-use-paths within the project. The concept
The LANE Team has reviewed the RFP requirements to develop the horizontal
as required.
shared-use-path is 5 percent; the minimum grade for all roadways is 0.5 percent
required by the RFP and AASHTO/VDOT criteria. The maximum grade for the
the required maximum and minimum grades for the roadway classification as
conceptual horizontal alignments and other features shown on the plans, applying
geometry and has made adjustments to the RFP profiles to accommodate the
The LANE Team has reviewed the provided roadway and shared-use-path vertical
Notes:
OVER DULLES TOLL ROAD AND AIRPORT ACCESS HIGHWAY
ROUTE 7 WIDENING AND BRIDGE REHABILITATION
TO: 0.13 MILES WEST OF TYCO ROAD
FROM: 0.56 MILES WEST OF TYCO ROAD
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135002A.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:26:03 AM
d82135002A.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
TYPICAL SECTIONSWest of Bridge Over Dulles Toll Road and Dulles Airport Access Road
Ex. WB Lanes
Mill & Overlay
Widening
Pavement
CG-7
Prop.
Ex. EB Lanes
Mill & Overlay *
Buffer
Prop.
Use Path
Prop. Shared
Ex. CG-6
10'2.5'
B
Construction
Route 7
LLB
WBL
B
EBL
L
4'
Slope
Match Ex.
STA 521+00.00 to STA 527+20.00
2" Asphalt Concrete
Milling & Overlay with
Widening
Pavement
2.5'4'
Ramp Deceleration Lane
STA 521+00.00 to STA 524+40.00
Ex. Pavement
42' & Var.
Match Ex. Slope
2%3:1
St'd UD-4
8' (0-33')
Varies2.5' 8'
2%
3:12%
St'd UD-4
(0-8')
Varies
CG-7
Prop.
Mill & Overlay
Widening
Pavement
Mill & Overlay2.5'4' 2.5' 10' 4'
BufferEx. EB LanesEx. WB LanesPavement Widening
Varies (2-42') Varies (14-30') (4-14')
Varies
12'Left Turn Lane
12'12'
Thru LaneThru LaneStriped Out Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Thru/Exit Lane
LB
WBL
B
Construction
Route 7
L B
EBL
L
3:1
2% Match Ex. Slope Match Ex. Slope 2%3:1Sawcut Full DepthVar.
St'd UD-4
Prop. CG-6Prop. CG-6
(14-34)
Varies
EB
EB
PG
2.001%
1' 1'(0-4')
Var.
LB
WBL B
Construction
Route 7
L B
EBL
L
12'Left Turn Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Right Exit Lane
Auxillary Lane
Striped Out
1' 1' 12'
Thru Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Thru Lane
12'
Lane
Right Exit
2.5'
3:1
2%
4' 4'
Use Path
Prop. Shared
Use Path
Prop. Shared
10' 4'10'
Use Path
Prop. Shared
Prop. CG-6
(2-4')
Varies
(5-10')
Varies
2%3:1
(25-28)
VariesVaries (14-16')
St'd UD-4
STA 527+20.00 to STA 530+00.00
* Mill & Overlay of EBL from STA 525+89.29 to STA 527+20.00
STA 530+00.00 to STA 530+75.00 (Begin Bridge Approach Slab)
STA 80+86 to STA 81+52STA 70+20 to STA 70+35STA 61+62 to STA 62+11STA 52+18 to STA 52+82STA 40+94 to STA 42+90STA 30+00 to STA 30+75STA 20+00 to STA 21+69STA 11+56 to STA 12+45
2C
2C
LBUse PathShared
LBUse PathShared
2%2% 6:16:1
3:1 10'4' 4'
TYPICAL SECTIONS (3)
3:1
5 Ex. Lanes
55'9'
ShldrEx.
16' 24'
2 Ex. LanesEx. Shldr
1.2' Ex. Shldr Prop. 54" HIGH BPPS-1 BARRIERShldrEx.
9.5'55'
5 Ex. Lanes
2.1' Ex. Shldr
23'
2 Ex. Lanes Ex. Shldr
17.5'
Prop. 54" HIGH BPPS-1 BARRIER
DULLES TOLL ROAD/DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ACCESS HIGHWAY
4' 4'4' 4'
St'd UD-4 St'd UD-4
St'd UD-4
CD Lanes)(Future Tysons Ramp
CD Lanes)(Future Tysons Ramp
33' - 3 (11') Lanes33' - 3 (11') Lanes
(SEE NOTE 4)
SHARED USE PATH IN CUT (SEE NOTE 4)
SHARED USE PATH IN FILL
drainage analysis and design is completed.
in a cut) will need to be modified after
4. Shared Use Path Typical Sections (especially
pavement (mainline and ramps)
3. All paved shoulders shall have mainline
grass medians.
2. St'd. UD-2 shall be placed under raised
roadway for mainline and ramps.
under curb/curb & gutter on low side of
1. St'd. UD-4 underdrains shall be placed
NOTES:
SlopeMatch Ex.
Match Ex. Slope
Match Ex. Slope
Prop. 54" HIGH BPPS-1 BARRIERProp. 54" HIGH BPPS-1 BARRIER
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
VA.
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135002C.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:26:35 AM
d82135002C.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0 100' 200'
SCALE
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
T
T
WV
WV
WV
Guy Wire
PP #V
A7812
LP #X
A40
PP
No #
PP
No #
PP
No #
PP No #
PP No #
PP #XA13
Guy Wire
Guy Wire
Guy Wire
PP #CO52
1
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
H (E
mpty)
EOI
Old
Ash Grove
Leesburg Pike
Deck
Carrin
gto
n Rid
ge Lane
Asphalt Path
14
16
18
19
20
001
PL
PLPLPL
PL PL
PL PL
PL PL PL PL PL
PL
R=25.00' A=46.76'
(3
6.8
0')
(N 69° 08' 58" E)
DB 11082 P
G 18
34
Ex. R/
W
Per
Ex. R/W Per VDOT Plan A-7148
R=5
97.3
9'
A=6
1.17'
51.18' R/
W
R=5
46.2
1' A
=49.6
9'
Ex. FAA R/W Per DB 1834 PG 635
Ex. R/W Per DB 11082 PG 1834
T7 T8 T9 T10
(R=5
97.3
9'
A=6
1.17')
(N 38° 01' 20" W 68.83')
(R=5
46.2
1' A
=49.6
9')
T12
T11 T11 (S 69° 08' 58" W 21.07')
(S 69° 08' 58"
W 10
1.39')
(N 38° 01' 39" W 758.76')
15
IPF
78. 57'
+34. 47
IPF
101. 4
8'
+41. 3
9
=
04° 07' 43"
Rt.
PI 20+0
1. 4
6
21
S 42°11'22" E
6' Wood Fence
2 Sty. F
r
&
Br
Dwl.
2 Sty. Br D
wl.
003
004
17
6'
Wood Fence
Sign
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Wood Barrica
de
160390. 15
7 89
11
10
1
12
2
4 53
6
13
14
Sta. 518+41.36
Begin Construction
F C
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Existing R/W
Tie to Existing Asphalt Path
Existing R/W
Existing R/W
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - WBL
CA
RRIN
GT
ON
RID
GE
LA
NE
OLD
AS
H
GR
OVE
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
513
514
515
516
PI 5
16+0
8.3
7
517 518 519 520
513
514
515
516
PI 5
16+13.2
0
517 518 519 520
PO
T 0+0
0.0
0
0
PC 0+4
5.6
6
PR
C 0+9
2.8
0
1
PT 1+3
4.9
2
2
Asphalt Path
Remove Existing
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135003.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:27:41 AM
d82135003.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
3
3
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 4 -
ST
A 520+0
0
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
Note : Figures in brackets and dot - dashed linesdenote Permanent Easements.
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
3ARoute 7 EB & WB Profile
520
Stanbridge Place
SR-7 SBL
SR-7 NBL
Deck
Deck
Deck
Deck
Leesburg Pike
Ramp
Jarrett V
alley Drive
Ra
mp
008
007
006
012
013
009
010
011
Mailboxes
#8800
Berea Church of Christ
1 Sty. Brick
6' Wood Fence
6' Wood Fence
PLPL
(41.59')
(N 38° 01' 39" W)
(38.56')
(S 44° 16' 20" E
)
(38.57')
(S 44° 16' 20" E
)
(40.59')
(S 36° 55' 47" E)
(15.87')
(S 36° 55' 47" E)PL
PL
Per DB 11082 PG 1834Ex. 15' F
CWA Esm't.
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
=161.51'
161.51')
(R=170.18' A=21.81')
R=170.18' A=21.81'
Well
Ex. R/W Per DB 11082 PG 1834 Ex. R/W Per VDOT Plan A-7148
S 63° 27' 52"
W 303.9
8'
Ex. R/
W
Per D
B 10
882 P
G 10
68
Ex. R/
W
Per D
B 10
882 P
G 10
68
Ex. FAA R
/W Per D
B 1834 PG 6
35
Ex. FAA R/W Per DB 1834 PG 635
Varia
ble
Width R/
W
Ex. R/W Per DB 11082 PG 1834
Ex. L/
A Line
Per VDOT
Plan DT00
-967-101, R/
W 204
Ex. FAA R/W Per DB 1834 PG 635
Ex. R/W Per DB 11082 PG 1834
(S 48° 47' 56"
W 301.60')
N 48° 47' 23" E 301.60'
(S 48° 47' 56"
W 60.7
8')
(S 38° 01' 20" E 493.00')
(S 44° 16' 20" E
77.14')
(S 50° 12' 54"
W 10
1.33')
S 50° 12' 36"
W 10
1.33'
(S 63° 28' 10"
W 254.4
6')
S 63° 27' 52"
W 254.4
6'
T11 (S 69° 08' 58" W 21.07')
(N 72° 00' E 444.4
9')
S 63° 27' 52"
W 372.0
0'
(N 69° 50' E 393.3
4')
(N 53°
15' 30" W 13
8.13')
(N 53°
15' 30" W 12
9.02')
(N 53°
15' 30" W 26
7.15')
(N 53°
20' 19" W
259.97')
(N 85° 3
2' 13" W 71.60')
(N 50° 01' 0
2" E 226.7
7')
(S 38° 01' 20" E 493.00')
Ex. VDOT
Esm't. P
er VDOT
Plan DT00
-967-101, R/
W 204
C15
C18
T14
T13
T15T18
Per DB 11788 PG 445
10' Sanitary Sewer Esm't.
Per DB 1
1788 PG 4
45
24' Ingr
ess/Egr
ess Esm't.
Per D
B 11788 P
G 445
15' F
WC
A
Es
m't.
(S 29° 29' E 200.0')
Ex. L/A Line P
er V
DOT Plan
DT00-967-101, R/
W 204
Ex. F
AA R/
W Per
DB 1834 P
G 635
Ex. V
DOT Esm't. Per V
DOT Plan
DT00-967-101, R/
W 204
IPF
105. 80'
+52. 13
IPF
85. 47'
+59. 02
=
0° 35' 02"
Rt.
PI 26+16. 97
22
23
24
25 26
27
28
S 38°03'40" E
(a)
(b)
(c)
2 Sty. Br D
wl.
2 Sty. Br D
wl.
004
005
Ex. 15' Storm
Sewer Es
m't. P
er D
B 8479 P
G 29
Ex. 15' Storm
Sewer Es
m't. P
er D
B 8479 P
G 29
Per DB 11082 PG 1834
Ex. 10' Sanitary Sewer Esm't. Per DB 11082 PG 1834
Ex. 10' Sanitary Sewer Esm't.
Per DB 11082 [G 1834Ex. Ingre
ss Egress Esm't.
Per DB 11082 [G 1834Ex. Ingre
ss Egress Esm't.
Per DB 11082 [G 1834Ex. Ingre
ss Egress Esm't.
15'
Do
minio
n Power Es
m't
10' Stor
m
Drain Es
m't
DB 10
837 P
G 450
T
G
T
GV
Gas MH
Tel. M
H
TC
TC
EOI
EOI
TSP
#29193
90
TS
P #2919
39
C
Traf. H
H
Traf.
HH
WV (2)
WV
FHWV
(Paved O
ver)
WV (Paved O
ver)
WV (Paved O
ver)
WV (Paved Over)
WM
Guy Wire
Guy
Wire
PP #A
O34
PP #A
O42
LP
No #
LP No #
Guy Wire (2)
PP #AO62
Guy
Wire
PP #XO93
LP
Tel. H
H
PP
No #
EOI
EOI
EOI
EOI
Dense Trees
Conc S
lab
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Post
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Barrica
de
Wood Barrica
de
Holly B
ush
Wood Barrica
de
161391. 9
7
17
18
19
20
24
25
26
13
14
21
001
Prop. R/W005
and Maintenance of Noise Wall
Prop. Perm. Esm't. for Installation
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135004.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:28:18 AM
d82135004.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
4
4
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 3 -
ST
A 520+0
0
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 5 -
ST
A 527+0
0
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
Note : Figures in brackets and dot - dashed linesdenote Permanent Easements.
Typical Sections 2A
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
36'
21.36'
38.7
0'
8'
38.7
0'
25'
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Limits of Grading
Pedestrian Underpass
Pedestrian Underpass
Edge of Pavement
Tie to Existing
Limits of GradingShared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Existing R/W
Remove Ex. Barricade
STANBRIDGE PLACE
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
RA
MP I
RA
MP
H
DRIV
E
JA
RR
ET
T
VALLE
Y
Do Not Disturb Ex. Fence
St'd. CG-3 Req'd.
St'd. CG-7 Req'd.
Type B Req'd.
Prop. CG-12,
(By Others)
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Sta. 522+04.92
Begin Project 0007-029-139, R201Sta. 522+31.74
Begin Project 0007-029-139, P101, C501
Existing R/W Potential Noise Wall
520
521
PI 5
21+19
.57
522 5
23
524
525
526
PI 5
26+2
7.9
2
527
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
PI 5
26+3
3.0
8
527
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
PI 5
26+3
7.7
0 527
PC 80
+00.0
0
80
81
82
83
PT 83
+17.8
9
PO
T 83
+85.6
1
POT 68+76.03
69
PC 69+29.08
70
PT 70+12.89
POT 70+83.10
POT 90+00.00
90
91
St'd. CG-7 Req'd.
St'd. CG-7 Req'd.
3
PC 3
+67.2
6
4
5
PR
C 5+4
1.28
6
PT 6+7
9.7
4
7
8
9
PC 9+2
1.36
O/
H
Sig
n
Ra
mp
SR-2
67
WB
L
Dulles
Air
port
Access Road
WB
L
Dulles Toll R
oad
Area U/C
Dulles Toll R
oad
Ra
mp
Crash
Barrier
Area U/C
Dulles
Air
port
Access Road E
BL
Garage
3 Car
Brick
1 - Sty.
#8801
2-Sty. Brick
016
017
014
015
Sig
n
Sig
n
Planter
Well
S 63° 27' 52"
W 303.9
8'
Ex. R/
W
Per D
B 10
882 P
G 10
68
Ex. R/W & L/A Line Per VDOT Plan A-7148
Ex. FAA R/W Per DB 1834 PG 635
(N 69° 50' E 393.3
4')
VDH Mon. Fd.
87. 17'
+11. 54
VDH Mon. Fd.
87. 17'
+81. 61
VDH Mon. Fd.
118. 77'
+51. 00
=
1° 5
9' 22" Lt.
PI 32
+09. 45
S 38°38'42" E
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
S 36°39'19" E
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Conc S
lab
Sign
Sign
Sign
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
17838
7. 91
T
T
Tel.
MH
T
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
EOI
Traf.
HH
Traf.
Cabin
et #37910
0/715
0
TS
P #2919
39
A
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
TS
P #2919
39
D
Traf.
HH
EOI
TC
TC
Traf.
HH
Traf.
HH
TC
Traf.
HH
Traf.
Ca
m. Pole
Traf. Sig
n
Gas Test
Station
T
T
E T
Guy
Wire (2)Gu
y Wire (3)
Elec. Ped.
PP
No #
Gas Lin
e
Marker
Gas Lin
e
Marker
Tel. P
ed. (D
amaged)
Tel. H
H
Tel. Fi
ber
HH
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. Fi
ber
Marker
TC
Traf.
MH
TTel. M
H
Station Tower
Weather Monitor
Tel. Ped.
(QLD(2))(QLB(2))
(QLD(3))(QLB(3))
(QLB)(QLD) (DATUR)
(DATUR-Abandoned)(DATUR-Abandoned)
22
54" BPPS-1 Req'd.
54" BPPS-1 Req'd.
54" BPPS-1 Req'd.
7
0007-029-139
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135005.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:29:26 AM
d82135005.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
Limits of Grading
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Limits of Grading
RAMP F
Underpass
Pedestrian
Sta. 530+99.19
Begin Project 0007-029-139, B617, B618
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
St'd. CG-2 Req'd.
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
Existing R/W
Existing R/W
RA
MP G
DU
LLE
S
TOLL R
OA
D (R
OU
TE 267) -
EB
L
AC
CE
SS
HIG
HW
AY -
EB
L
DU
LLE
S IN
T'L AIR
PO
RT
AC
CE
SS
HIG
HW
AY -
WB
L
DU
LLE
S IN
T'L AIR
PO
RT
DU
LLE
S
TOLL R
OA
D (R
OU
TE 267) -
WB
L
527
528
529
PI 5
29+5
6.8
9
530
531
532
533
534
527
528
529
530
PI 5
30+8
2.0
9
531
532
533
534
527 5
28
529
530
PI 5
30+8
0.7
0
531
532
533
534
PO
T 50+0
0.0
0
50
51
PC 51+39.6
3
52
53
54POT 90+00.00
POT 91+52.28
PO
T 60+0
0.0
0
60
PC 60+3
3.3
1
61
PCC 61+3
7.03
62
PT 62+37.65
POT 62+54.35
St'd. GR-2 Req'd.
St'd. GR-9 Req'd.
St'd. GR-FOA-1 Ty. I Req'd.
St'd. GR-FOA-1 Ty. I Req'd.
St'd. GR-9 Req'd.
PC 9+2
1.36
PT 9+5
9.80
10
11
PC 11+3
3.2
0
12
PT 12+36.93
13
PC 13+03.41
PT 13
+80.7
3
14 15 16 17
Type B Req'd.
Prop. CG-12, Type B Req'd.
Prop. CG-12,
Type B Req'd.
Prop. CG-12,
5
5
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 4 -
ST
A 527+0
0
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 6 -
ST
A 534+0
0
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - WBL
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
RA
MP G
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
AC
CE
SS
HIG
HW
AY -
EB
L
DU
LLE
S IN
T'L AIR
PO
RT
DU
LLE
S
TOLL R
OA
D (R
OU
TE 267) -
EB
L
Note : Figures in brackets and dot - dashed linesdenote Permanent Easements.
SURVEYED BY, DATE
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
Typical Sections 2A
B617, B618,
Directed by VDOT
To Be Relocated as
Exist. CCTV Camera
25'
39'
22'
63.5'
4 - 12' LANES
MATCH LINE SHEET 5C
12.96'
14'
10' SUP
14' SUP
14' SUP
10'-14' SUP
3 - 12' LANES
4 - 12' LANES
EX. S
HLD
EX. S
HLD
EX. S
HLD
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
7
0007-029-139
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135005C.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:30:15 AM
d82135005C.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
Limits of Grading
55
PT 55+24.26
Asphalt Ramp
Asphalt R
amp
Asphalt R
amp
Brush
& Pines
Mixed Hardwoods
Cedars
Silt F
ence
Silt F
ence
Mixed Cedars & Pines
Mixed Cedars & Pines
Mixed Spr
uce & Pines Mixe
d Hardwood
s & Pine
s
Mixed Har
dwoods
& Pines
Saplings
Metal
Guardrail
Metal
Guardrail
Gravel Shoulder
IPF
661.20'
+28.06
Ex. VDOT
Esm't. P
er VDOT
Plan DT00
-967-101, R/W 2
04
Ex. L/A Lin
e Per VDOT
Plan DT00
-967-101, R/W 2
04
Dulles Toll Road - V
A
Route 267 - W
BL
Asphalt
Asphalt
8' W
ood
Wall
Metal
Guardrail
17A
23
27
28
Grass
Brush &
Medium
Large
Bushes
Evergreens
Hardwoods &Large MixedMedium To
4" Oak4" Oak
4" Maple
3" Cedar
Brush
Mixed Hardwoods & Brush
8" Pine
10" Pine
4" Oak
4" Pines
In Pl. 54.0
0' - 15"
Metal Pipe
Inv. O
ut = 371.40
Inv. In = 372.69
5C
5C
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
AC
CE
SS
HIG
HW
AY -
EB
L
DU
LLE
S IN
T'L AIR
PO
RT
DU
LLE
S
TOLL R
OA
D (R
OU
TE 267) -
EB
L
Note : Figures in brackets and dot - dashed linesdenote Permanent Easements.
Typical Sections 2A
MATCH LINE SHEET 5
Dulles
Air
port
Access Road E
BL
SR-2
67 E
BL
Leesburg Pike SR-7 NBL
O/
H
Sig
n
O/
H
Sig
n
Gate
SR-7 EBL Leesburg Pike
Ramp
O/H
Metrorail U/C
Ramp
Gate
Crash
Barrier
Ra
mp
6' Chain Link Fence
4' Wood Fenc
e
Wash Grate
Brushes and Shru
bs
Trailer
Trailer
10" Cedar
019
018
Sign
Sign
Brushes and Shru
bs
Sig
n
Sig
n
Sig
n
Sig
n
Brushes and Shru
bs
6' Chain Link Fence
6' Chain Link Fence
Sign
Sign
Crash
Barrier
Conc
Bollards
Sig
n
6' Chain Link Fence
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Trailer
Trailer
Deck
(a)(b
)
Trailer
=
6° 49' 25"
Rt.
PI 36+3
7. 17
S 43°28'44" E
36
37
38
39
41
42
40
091
092
Temp
Building
Trailer
Temp
Building
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Conc Pier
Conc Pier
Jersey Barrier
Jersey Barrier
Dense
Trees
Dense
Trees
Dense Trees
Dense Trees
Grass
6' Chain Link
Fence
Dense Trees
6' Chain Link
Fence
185385. 0
9
T
T
E
E
T
E
E
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer
Guy Wire
Guy Pole
Tel. M
H
EE
TS
P
Traf. Sig
n
T
TE
OI
PP #B
M75
PP
No #
PP #B
M85
T
Guy
Wire
PP #B
M44
PP #B
M74
PP #B
M53
PP #C
M02
Guy
Wire
PP
No #
PP
No # Guy
Wire
PP
No #
PP
No #
PP No #
Guy WireGuy Wire
Guy
Wire
Gas Lin
e
Marker
Gas Lin
e
Marker
Gas Lin
e
Marker
Gas Lin
e
Marker
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. P
ed.
Guy
Wire (2)
Guy
Wire (2)
EOI
Elec.
Box
On Post
Gas Box
On Post
(QLB(3))(QLD(3))
(QLB(2))(QLD(2))
(QLD)(QLB)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
(DAT
UR)
(DAT
UR)
(QLD)
(QLD)
RA
MP
DShared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Limits of Grading
Support Column
Metrorail Guideway
FC
St'd. MS-2 Req'd.
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
St'd. MS-2 Req'd.
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
St'd. MS-2 Req'd.
Req'd.
St'd. MS-2
Metrorail Guideway Support Column
St'd. GR-9 Req'd.
St'd. CG-2 Req'd.
St'd. GR-FOA-1 Ty. I Req'd.
St'd. GR-2 Req'd.
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
RAMP E
DU
LLE
S
TOLL R
OA
D (R
OU
TE 267) -
EB
L St'd. MB-7F Req'd.
St'd. MB-7D Req'd.
St'd. CG-2 Req'd.
RAMP C
534
535
PC 535+4
9.7
7
536
537
538
PT 538+4
4.6
7
539
PC 539+7
9.0
6
540
534
535
PI 5
35+8
3.0
9
536
538
539
540
541
534
535
PI 5
35+8
9.19
536
537
538
539
540
541
20
PC
C 20+9
1.67
21
22
PT 22
+77.2
2
23
24
PO
T 24+2
4.6
5
PO
T 40+0
0.0
0
40
PC 40+2
6.8
9
PC
C 40+6
8.0
6
41
42
43
30
31 POT 31+00.00
PO
T 0+0
0.0
0
0
PC 0+3
4.4
4
PT 0+6
4.3
4
PC 0+9
4.2
2
1
PT 1+70.16
PC 1+97.73
2
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
St'd. GR-FOA-1 Ty. I Req'd.
St'd. GR-2 Req'd.St'd. GR-9 Req'd.
18 19
PC 19
+98.0
2
20
PT 20+84.00
21
PC 10
+00.0
0
10
11
12PT 12+
10.88
Limits of Grading
54" BPPS-1 Req'd.
54" BPPS-1 Req'd.
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135006.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:30:54 AM
d82135006.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
Facility
Potential SWM
6
6
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 5 -
ST
A 534+0
0
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 7 -
ST
A 541+00
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - WBL
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
Note : Figures in brackets and dot - dashed linesdenote Permanent Easements.
Typical Sections 2B
B617, B618,
MATCH LINE SHEET 6C (SHARED USE PATH 22+00)
MATCH LINE SHEET 6D (SHARED USE PATH 2+00) MATCH LINE SHEET 6D (RAMP D 29+60)
50.2
9'
38'
30.4
3'
44.2
8'
22'
40'
13'
21.36'
3 - 12' LANES14' SUP
14' SUP
12.96'
12.00'
TO
WE
R
RD.
10' SUP
3 - 12' LANES
SHLD
4 - 12' LANES
& Pines
Mixed Hardwoods
& Pines
Mixed Hardwoods
& Pines
Mixed Hardwoods
Asphalt RampMetal Gu
ardrail
Mixed Hardwoods, Cedars & Pines
Asphalt R
amp
Asphalt R
amp
Asphalt Parking
& Pines
Mixed Hardwoods
4' Iron Rail
3' J
ersey B
arrier
Asphalt
6'
Chainlink Fence w/
Barb
Wire
CG-6
2'-C
&G
2'-C
&GCG-6
CG-6
Gravel
&
Asphalt S
hould
er
Gra
vel &
Asphalt S
houlder
IPF
336.65'
+48.72
Comp
182.64'
+53.40
IPF
196.16'
+61.78
(N 51° 16' 30" E 82.5
8')
(N 83° 4
0' 19" E 16
5.22')
(N 51° 0
1' 16" E 270.19')
(R=50.00' A=4.74')
Per DB 3299 PG 82
Ex. 10' FCWA Esm't.
Per DB 10688 PG 312
Ex. 4.57 m Storm Sewer Esm't.
Ex. V
DO
T
Es
m't. &
L/
A
Lin
e Per V
DO
T
Pla
n
DT00-9
67-101,
R/
W 204
Ex. V
DO
T
Es
m't. Per V
DO
T
Pla
n
DT00-9
67-101,
R/
W 204
Ex. F
AA
R/
W
Per D
B 18
34 P
G 635
Ex. L/
A
Lin
e Per V
DO
T
Pla
n
DT00-9
67-101,
R/
W 204
Ex. F
AA R/
W Per D
B 18
34 P
G 635
Ex. L/
A Line Per V
DOT Plan DT00-9
67-101, R/
W 204
Ex. V
DOT Esm't. Per V
DOT Plan DT00-9
67-101, R/
W 204
Asphalt Parking
Dulles Air
port
Access Road - E
BL
Dulles Toll Road - V
A Route 267 - E
BL
Asphalt
3' Jersey
Barrier
3" Maple
42
43
72
12'
Chain Lin
k Fence
Conc.
Rip Ra
p
& Evergreens
Mixed Har
dwoods
Mediu
m To
Large
Hardwoods
Large Mixed
21" Birch36" Birch
18" Maple
To Grass
To Grass
& EvergreensMixed Hardwoods Medium To Large
Bushes
Grass
To Route 7 West Bound
Shoulder
Asphalt
Shoulder
Asphalt
Grass
3' C
onc. Jers
ey Wall
Ramp
Asphalt
Paved
East B
ound 267
To E
ntra
nce
Brush
Conc. Walk
4" Elm
4" Elm
4" Elm
4" Elm
4" Maple
4" Maple4" Maple
Maple
4"
Retaining
Wall
235326 SF
DB 10085 PG 105
TM 29-1-01-0016
USA, INC
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES,
Sign
Parking
4" Maple
4" Maple
4" Maple
4" Maple
Sig
n
Sig
n
4" Maple
Trailer
Trailer
Deck
Ex. V
DO
T
Es
m't. &
L/
A
Lin
e Per V
DO
T
Pla
n
DT00-9
67-101,
R/
W 204
Facility
Potential SWMMATCH LINE SHEET 6C (SHARED USE PATH 28+70)
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' AsphaltLimits of Grading
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Limits of Grading
St'd. MB-7D Req'd.
Underpass
Pedestrian Prop. Ret. Walls
Limits of Grading
St'd. MB-7D Req'd.
Underpass
Pedestrian
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
PC 16+85.58
17
18
19
PCC 19+06.3
0
PRC 12+51.43
13
PT 13+37.33
PC 13+93.09
14
15
PT 15+
04.05
22
PC 22+78.61
23
PT 23+8
2.4
3
24
25
26
POT 26+2
0.9
1
27
PC 27+2
2.5
2
PT 27
+68.73
28
PC 28
+38.7
2
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135006C.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:31:40 AM
d82135006C.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
Facility
Potential SWM
6C
6C
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
RA
MP
C
RA
MP
B
MATCH LINE SHEET 6 (SHARED USE PATH 22+00)
MATCH LINE SHEET 7 (SHARED USE PATH 28+70)
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Typical Sections 2B
004
1 - 20' L
AN
E
1 - 18' L
AN
E
5'
5'
DZ-12
6.4'
EX. 6' S
HLD
EX. 6' S
HLD
EX. 6' S
HLD
EX. 6' S
HLD
Jersey Barrier
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec.
HH (E
mpty)
Traf.
Cabin
et #35410
Elec.
Meter
Elec.
HH
TSP
Tel. P
ed.
Elec. Transfor
mer
LP
EEOI
Elec.
MH
PP #B
M74
PP
No #
PP
No # Guy
Wire
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
Elec.
HH
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
(SH
ARE
D USE PAT
H 11+00)
MAT
CH LIN
E SHEET 6D
PCC 43+52.62
44
45
PT 45+18.31
POT 45+22.55
PC 27+86.49
28
29
PT 29+25.84
POT 0+00.00
0
1
2
PC 2
+08.57
Due S
outh
PC 1+97.73
PT 2+7
6.2
4
3
PC 3+9
4.5
5
4
PT 4+2
5.0
4
5
6
PC 6+2
3.5
6
PT 6+6
6.01
7
PC 7+6
8.59
8
PT 8+25.14
9
PC 9+57.83
Shared Use P
ath
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Shared Use P
ath
Prop. 10' Asphalt
12PT 12+
10.88
13
14
POT 14
+54.71
C Abut.C Pier. C Abut.
C Abut.
C Abut.
Pro
p. R
etaining wall
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Limits of Grading
Limits of Grading
Limits of Grading
Mixed Hardwoods
Asp
halt Ram
p
Grass
8" Maple
6" Cedar
6" Cedar
6" Cedar
Mio
xed
Hard
woods,
Cedars
&
Underbrush
Asphalt Ram
p
Asphalt R
amp
Asphalt R
amp
Pines
Pines
Pines
Mixed Hardwoods
Conc. Ra
mp
Transmitter
WMAA
Shed
Mast
Antenna
Gate
Gravel Parking
Asphalt Parking
Pad
Asphalt
Trailer
Trailer
Trailer
Storage
Open
Asphalt Walk
3' Jersey
Barrier
3' Jersey Barrier
Asphalt
6' Chainlink Fence
6' Chainlink Fence
(S 77° 4
1' 30" E 75
4.60')
Ex. F
CW
A Esm't. Per D
B 5927
PG 1562
Ex. L/A Line P
er V
DOT Plan
DT00-967-101, R/
W 204
Ex. F
AA R/
W Per D
B 1834 PG 635
Ex. V
DOT Esm't. Per V
DOT Plan
DT00-967-101, R/
W 204
Conc. C
urb
Conc. Slab
65
66
67
68
15" Pine
Pine
10" Twin
3" Cherry
3" Cherry
10" Cherry
Mixed Har
dwoods
& Cedar
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135006D.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:32:06 AM
d82135006D.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
6D
6D
MATCH LINE SHEET 6 (SHARED USE PATH 2+00)MATCH LINE SHEET 6 (RAMP D 29+60)
(SH
ARE
D USE PAT
H 11+00)
MAT
CH LIN
E SHEET 7
RA
MP
A
RA
MP
D
RA
MP
E
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Typical Sections 2B
1 - 16' LA
NE
TO
WE
R
RD.
Dense Trees
Crash
Barrier
U/C
U/C
Riser
Sub-Station
Ramp
Sign
Sign
SR-7 NBLLeesburg Pike
O/H Matero Rail (U/C)
SR-7 SBL Leesburg Pike
Ashgrove Lane
Sig
n
Conc.
Sig
n
Sig
n
Conc
Rip-R
ap
Bollards
4" Maple
4" Maple
4" Maple
4" Maple3" Maple
3" Maple
Asphalt Sidewalk
Conc.
3" Maple
020
024
025
026
021
028
029
030
031
032
023
022
027
033
034
035
037
036
038
039
040
Sig
n
Sig
n
Rip-R
ap
Conc
Conc. Sig
n
Retaining Wall
6' Chain Link Fence
U/C
3" Maple
Sig
n
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Conc
U/C
3" Oak
3" Oak
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
(N 51° 16' 30" E 82.5
8')
(R=239.32' A=68.22'C20
R=239.32' A=68.22'
Ex. L/A Line P
er V
DOT Plan
DT00-967-101, R/
W 204
Ex. F
AA R/
W Per D
B 1834 PG 635
Ex. V
DOT Esm't. Per V
DOT Plan
DT00-967-101, R/
W 204
Ex. F
AA R/
W Per
DB 1834 P
G 635 T
19
(S 38° 10' 34" E 172. 97')
(46. 58')
(S 01° 2
9' 42" W)
T19 (S 16° 39' 16" E 13. 65')
T20 (S 55° 39' 16" E 37. 12')
T21 (S 36° 15' 00" E 138.87')
C20
T20 T21Ex. R/W Per DB 20011 PG 814
(N 03°44'44" E 22.50')
4" Maple
4" Maple
4" Maple 4" Maple
3" Oak
3" Oak 3" Oak 3" Oak 3" OakIPF
21. 22'
+47. 70
=
3° 43' 32"
Rt.
PI 43
+69. 97
S 39°45'11" E43
45 46 47 48 49
=
0° 43' 08" Lt.
PI 47+ 76. 94
(N 38°02'50" W 270.28')
(N 21°31'59" E 37.88')
N 21°37'52" E 37.88'
N 03°50'07" E 22.50'
N 37°56'59" W 261. 50'
S 39°02'04" E44
(a)
(b)
Str
ucture
Not found
(Burie
d)
(b)
(c)
(a) (c
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In Pl. Grate
Rim
= 379. 54
In Pl. R
CP
Inv. . O
ut
= 375. 44
Construction
Barrels
2793
83. 8
1
278383. 9
0
E
T
TT
T
T
T
TV
E
T
T
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP LP
LP LP
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
TV
HH (E
mpty)
Tel. M
HTel. M
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. P
ed. Tel. Ped.
Tel. H
H (E
mpty)
TT
Guy
Wire
WV (2)
WV (2)
WV
WV
FH
WV (2)
WV
WVWV
WV
FH
WM
GV G
V
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
H
E
E
E
EE
E
T
T
EOI
T
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
E
LP Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Water Test
Station
Water Test
Station FH
GV
GV
GV
GM
PP
No #
Tel. M
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Elec.
HH
LP
WV (3)
WV (2)
TTel. P
ed. (Fib
er Untr
aceable)
Tel. H
H
(DAT
UR-A
bandoned)
(DAT
UR-A
bandoned)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
(DAT
UR-Aban
doned)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
2728
29
30
004
003
Sidewalk Esm't.
Prop. Permanent
Shared Use Path
of Retaining Wall and
Installation and Maintenance
Prop. Perm. Esm't for
Sta. 547+21.27
End Construction
Sta. 547+32.46
End Project 0007-029-139, R201Constructed by Others
Tie to Existing MS-2
Limits of Grading
Limits of Grading
Constructed by Others
Tie to Existing MS-2
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - WBL
Prop. Ret. Walls
St'd. MS-2 Req'd.
St'd. MS-2 Req'd.
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
Existing R/W
Req'd.
St'd. CG-6
St'd. CG-12, Type A Req'd.
Constructed by Others
Tie to Existing Curb Ramp
Type B Req'd.
St'd. CG-12,
Type B Req'd.
St'd. CG-12,
Sta. 543+53.03
End Project 0007-029-139, C501, P101
RAMP A
Existing R/W
Shared Use Path
Prop. 10' Asphalt
Prop. Ret. Walls
St'd. CG-6 Req'd.
Constructed by Others
Tie to Existing Curb Ramp
Req'd.
St'd. CG-2
RA
MP
B
542
543
PT 543
+49.4
5
544
545
546
547
548
541
542
PI 5
42
+79.13
543
544
545
546
PC 546+16.7
4
547
548
PT 548+0
4.2
1
541
542
PI 5
42
+85.19
543
544
545
546
PC 546+2
2.0
5
547
548
PT 548+0
7.0
5
3
4
5
PT 5+3
5.3
0
6
PO
T 6+10.8
7
PO
T 10
+00.0
0
10
PC 10
+60.8
7
11
PCC 11+15.47
12
10
PCC 10
+80.2
6
11
PT 11+3
5.76
Share
d Use
Path
Pro
p. 10' Asphalt
Share
d Use
Path
Pro
p. 10' Asphalt
29
PCC 29+5
2.09
PT 29+9
6.5
1
30
PI 3
0+5
3.9
7
31
32
PC 32
+01.9
9
PCC 32+15.53
PT 32+26.74
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135007.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:32:52 AM
d82135007.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
7
7
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 6 -
ST
A 541+00
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 8 -
ST
A 548+0
0
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
Proposed Full Depth Pavement
LEGEND
Proposed Pavement Milling and Overlay
Demolition of Pavement
Note : Figures in brackets and dot - dashed linesdenote Permanent Easements.
Typical Sections 2B
(SH
ARE
D USE PAT
H 11+00)
MAT
CH LIN
E SHEET 6D
MATCH LINE SHEET 6C (SHARED USE PATH 28+70)
26'
30'
45.4
1'
3 - 12' LANES
4 - 12' LANES
1 - 16' L
AN
E
T
T
T TV
TV
T
T
TT
TT
TT
TT
EE
T
TT
T
TV
EE
TC
E
EE
LP
LP LP
LP
LP
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. MH
Elec. MHElec. Transform
er
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer Elec. HH
EOI
Tel. MH
Tel. M
H
Tel. P
ed.
Tel. C
abin
et #8590
TV
HH
TV H
H
TV H
H
Traf. HH
TSP
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
H
Gas Regulator
EE
E
E
ET
T
T
TT
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
WV
FHWV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WVFH
WV (N
o Lid) W
V
WV (2)
WV (N
o Lid)
GV
GVG
V
GV
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
HTel. M
H
T
T
TTTT
T
T
EE
E
E E
T
T
T
T
TC
T
T
T
T
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec. Transfor
mer
Elec.
Meter
Traf.
HH
EElec.
HH
Elec.
MH
Elec.
MH
Guy
Wire
PP
No #
Guy
Wire
Guy
Wire
PP
No #
LP
LP
LP
EOI
FH
WV (A
bandoned)
GV
GM
TC
Traf.
Cabin
et
Traf.
HH
TC
TC
TS
P
TS
PTraf.
HH
TS
P
TS
P (T
emporary)
Traf.
HH (E
mpty)
EOI
EOI
Tel. Fiber H
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. P
ed.
Tel. Fiber H
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. P
ed.
Tel. H
H (E
mpty)
Tel. H
H (E
mpty)
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. M
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
EOI
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fiber HH
Tel. Fiber HH
Elec. Sign
Elec. Transfor
mer
(Untr
aceable Cables)
Tel. Fib
er H
H
EOI
EOI
EOI (3)E
OI
EOI
EOI
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
Tel. Fib
er H
H
(No Record of Connection)
Gas Test
Station
Unk. Valve
(DAT
UR-A
bandoned)
(QLD)(QLB)(D
AT
UR)
(DA
TU
R)
(QL
D)
(DA
TU
R-A
bandoned)
(DA
TU
R-A
bandoned)
(DA
TU
R-A
bandoned)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
(QLD)(QLB)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
(DATUR-Abandoned)
Conc
SupportConc
Support
Westw
ood
Center Drive
Tyco Road
O/H Matero Rail (U/C)
Conc
Sign
Conc
Sig
n
Sig
n
(c)
(a)
(a)
(d)
(c)
(b)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(a)
(c)
(b)
3" Maple
Truck Scales
Conc
Grass
Media
n
Conc
Sig
n
Conc
Conc
(a)
042
043
044
045
046
051
052
057
060
059
048
047
049
050
055
041
058
(a)
(b)(c)
056
061
062
063
Manhole
Sign
6' Chain Link Fence
Sig
n
U/C
U/C
U/C
064
Conc
ConcAsphalt Walk
Conc
Asphalt Walk
Flagpole
Bollards
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Conc.
Bushes
Sign
Bushes
4'
Chain Lin
k Fence
Asphalt Walk
Brick Walk
U/C
U/C
U/C
(d)
054
U/C
U/C
6' Chain Link Fence
3" Cherry
3" Cherry
U/C
T23
N 51° 0
1' 3
9" E 504.5
2'
R=4
41.00'
A=145.2
1'
Ex. R/W Per VDOT Plan A-7148
(S 61° 3
7' 30"
W 578.5
8')
N 51° 0
1' 4
0" E 578.7
8'
(N 61° 3
7' 30" E 17
5.0
0')
N 39° 34' 31" W 137.17
(S 28° 22' 51" E 169.99')
(N 28° 22' 30" W 170.00')
(S 62° 32' 40"
W 603.3
1')
(R=4
41.00'
A=145.2
1')
(S 31° 37' 48" E 395.05')
C22
(S 72° 30' 09"
W 458.5
7')
T27
T28
T29
T30T31
T28 (N 72° 52' 09" E 39. 41')
T29 (S 37° 36' 14" E 207. 51')
(N 38°08'08" W 195.51')
(N 45°5
2'2
5" E)
(51.23')
(S 62° 32' 40"
W 576.3
1')
T36 (N 10° 56' 13
" W 30. 87')
T36
=
3° 58' 51" Rt.
PI 51+ 4
9. 34
=
4° 22' 40" Lt.
PI 54+ 31. 6
2
S 43°00'54" E
S 38°38'15" E50 51
52
53
54 5
5
56
N 38° 02' 00" W 270.00'
T37 S 61° 0
8' 14"
W 9. 3
7'
T38
C23
T37
T38
N 71° 0
4' 37"
W 32. 51'
R
=43. 0
0'
A=11. 9
2'
C22
N 10° 56' 44"
W 30. 87'
N 45°5
2'14" E
N 38°08'39" W 195.51'
S 39°02'04" E
053
Construction
Bollards
ShurbsShurbs
10"
Oak
10"
Oak
Wood
Retainin
g
Wall
T22
C21
T24
(N 38°08'42" W)
(52.35')
108.0
6
S51°02'2
9"W
(R= 43.0
0'
A=15.0
6')
276
391.05
277386. 17
31
32
33
34 38
30
35
Curve RT7E-5
PI = 549+56.27
T = 50.15'
L = 100.30'
R = 5,000.01'
549+06.12PC =
PT = 550+06.42
Curve RT7W-5
PI = 550+32.27
T = 51.69'
L = 103.38'
R = 3,011.01'
549+80.58PC =
PCC =550+83.95
Curve RT7W-6
PI = 551+49.73
T = 65.78'
L = 131.55'
R = 5,011.00'
550+83.95PCC =
PT = 552+15.50
V = 40 MPH
V = 40 MPH V = 40 MPH
e = Existinge = Existing
e = Existing
(RO
UT
E 3888)
WE
ST
OW
WO
D
CE
NT
ER
DRIV
ET
YC
O
RO
AD (R
OU
TE 3888)
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - WBL
LEESBURG PIKE (ROUTE 7) - EBL
548
549
PC 549+0
6.5
2
550
PT 550+0
6.8
1
551
552
PO
T 552
+09.4
2
548
PT 548+0
4.2
1
549
PC 549+7
8.6
2
550
PC
C 550+8
0.6
2
551
552
PT 552
+11.12
548
PT 548+0
7.0
5
549
PC 549+8
1.45
550
PC
C 550+8
4.8
3
551
552
PT 552
+16.3
7
7
0007-029-139
THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED
AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT
TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.
VA.
STATE
ROUTE PROJECT
REVISEDSTATE
STATE
ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.
d82135008.dgn
Plotted By: LASHLEY9:33:15 AM
d82135008.dgn
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT SHEET NO.
DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT
SURVEYED BY, DATE
DESIGN BY
SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE
0
SCALE
25' 50'
Woolpert, Inc. - February 6, 2013
Woolpert, Inc. - January 22, 2013
Arifur Rahman, PE (703) 259-1940 (Nova District)
VA.
R201, P101
0007-029-139, C501,
13921 Park C
enter Road Suite 140 Hern
don, Virginia 20171
CO
NC
EP
T
PL
AN
S
8
8
REFERENCES
( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )
Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts
Denotes Construction Limits in Fills
C
F
Existing R/W
Existing R/W
MA
TC
H
LIN
E
SH
EE
T 7 -
ST
A 548+0
0
ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY
RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-
WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. Proposed Full Depth Pavement
* - Width including shouldersSUP - Shared Use Path
Legend:
Scale: 1" = 25'
Sta. 533+08.53
C Pier 3
LB
58'-3" 58'-3"
to be re
mo
ve
d
Superstructure and
Substructure
189-08B
with Sec. 411. The existing structure is designated a Type B structure in accordance
any discrepancies and interferences, before commencing work.dimensions and existing bridge conditions and shall notify VDOT of The Contractor shall be responsible for field verification of all
Elevations shown are based on Vertical Datum NAVD 88.
Structure and Bridge Section.As-Built Plans can be obtained from VDOT - Northern VA District on the As-Built bridge plans No. 189-08 and 189-08A. A copy of the These plans are prepared based on survey and the information shown
and 189-08A.Bridge No. of existing bridges are 1132 and 1133 and Plan No. is 189-08
Low permeability concrete shall be used in this project.
be Class A4. Concrete in substructure shall be Class A3.Concrete in superstructure including parapets and terminal walls shall
2011 and latest revisions.Department of Transportation Work Area Protection Manual, JuneThis project shall be constructed in accordance with the Virginia
documents.Specifications and Special Provisions included in the contractThese plans are incomplete unless accompanied by the Supplemental
Bridge Standards, 2008. Standards: Virginia Department of Transportation Road and
Modifications. Edition, 1996; 1997 and 1998 Interim Specifications; and VDOT AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th
Overall width 66'-10" face to face of rails. EBL: 52'-0" Roadway, 10" Barrier, 14'-0" SUP Overall width 78'-10" face to face of rails. WBL: 14'-0" SUP, 10" Barrier, 64'-0" roadway