YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
(well-beingJ
J



(well-beingJ


J

5



A() 183 183(100)
169 1 49( 22 27) 2 50( 20
30) 3 70( 33 37)
(2)

(3)
jJ


) 5
3: 4: 5:
Feetham FFFS(FeethamFamily Functioning Survey) 27)
28)
FFFS I Epstein
FAD(Family Assessment Device) 3
o FDM(FamilyDynamics Measure)
12) FDMII ( the Fami 1 y Dynami cs Measure II ) Olson
FACES 16)
m) 01son34 )
(Cohesion)


(disengaged)J - i (separated)J - i (connected)J -
(enmeshed)J4JJ
Jj

10
(structured)J - I (flexible)J - I (chaotic)J4
JJ


(Balanced)


J
i:
I I λ I I 11 I I
1.

()
(44.4%) 94(55.6%)1 49( 22 27) 2 50(
20 30) 3 70( 33 37)
2
1(15.4) 3 17(10.1 2 79(46.7) 1 46(27.2) 0
26(15.4)

1.

n % n % n %
1 22 44.9 27 55.1 49 100 2 20 40 30 60 50 100 3 33 47.1 37 52.9 70 100 75 44.4 94 55.6 169 100
2.
n %
O 26 15.4 1 46 27.2 2 79 46.7 3 17 10.1 4 0.6
169 100

3.so
so so 1 3.52+1.13 3.71 +1.10
2 3.75:t1.07 3.94:t0.10
4 3.56+0.92 3.76+1.10
5 3.04+1.12 3.36:t1.18
6 2.84:t0.96 2.87:t 1.10
7 3.21:t 1.11 3.02:t1.11
8 2.83+0.99 2.65:t1.08
9 3.031.15 3.38:t1.33
10 4.09:t1.03 4.24:t0.99


34.32:t8. 67
(disengaged) J - I (separated)J - I (connected)J - I (enmeshed)J
4 Olson 10-24 25-31
32-38 39-50)
18 (10.7) 45 (26.6%) 56 (33.1) 50 (29.6%)
J
J

'1'A 56 33.1 35.00+1.92
45 26.6 28.072.05
3
:t 1. 04 4.03:t 1. 13
8

16
7.SD
4.03+1.13 4.09+1.09
8.





% 46.2 29.6 16 3.6 4.7
9 SD(3.55
1. 11)(3.36::t 1. 16)
10
J32(18.9%)J57(33.7%)j
6
9.SD
so 3.55+1.11 3.36+1.16 3.44+1.13
10.
43 25.4 28 16.6 9 5.3
17
J104 (61.5) (
)J43(25.4%) (
)J7 4.1%J6(3.6%)
J5 (3%)J4(2.4%)
6
t
1. 72 A

(10.1 2 79 (46.7) l 46(27.2) 0 26(15.4) 3
2 1

491()

(26.6%) 56(33.1 50(29.6%)J
Jj

J

j




J78(46.2%)
J(29.6%)J27(16%)J6(3.6%)
J(4.7%) 7
24)
() J()


J32(18.9%)

)J43(25.4%)
()J7 4.1%
J6(3.6%)J5 (3%)J4(2.4%)
6

(31)
j 6



(26.6%) 56(33.1) 50(29.6%)j
j JJ

J7 4.1%J6(3.6%)J5 (3%)
J4(2.4%)
6

(well-being)

5)

(33.1) 50(29.6)



Satisfaction in the View of a Junior High School Student
Hana Karniya
Summary
Recently in ]apan family structure has been changing and there has been an
increase in nuclear families and single-person households. Meanwhile problems
such as birthrate decline population aging and shrinkage of the working
population continue unabated. It is said that the function of family is starting
to wear thin. It is important to understand these changes accurately in such a modern
world.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the degree of family satisfaction and family
structure in the view of a junior high school student by using the Family Adaptabili ty
and Cohesion Evaluation Scales 1lI and also to clarify the ideal family picture of
junior high school students.
The questionnaire investigation was conducted on 183 students of A junior high school
in Chiba Prefecture. The relationship between family structure and family
satisfaction was analyzed using the correlation coefficient. Microsoft Excel 2010
and SPSS Version 16 were used to analyze the data.
Family structure was divided into four categories: very connected connected
separated and disengaged. The results for each category are as follows: very
connected 50 people (29. 6) connected 56 people (33. 1) separated 45 people (26. 6)
and disengaged 18 people (10. 7).Resul ts wi th high value showa strong union whereas
resul ts wi th low value show separation in the family. There was a posi ti ve correlation
between family structure and family satisfaction both with p-values0.01. High
connectivity within the family showed a high degree of family satisfaction.
The resul ts of the questionnaire concerning the ideal family picture were as follows:
30
families that get along well (61.5) no negative images (25.4) insignificant
(4. 1) normal families (3.6) families that have more freedom (3.0) my family
(4. 1).More than half of the subjects idealized families that get along well. The
opinion of junior high school students for the ideal family structure was identical
to the real family like the highest function and self-esteem of the family.
The results are reflective of modern day junior high school students. One of the
questions concerning junior high school students is the trend for them to passionately
gain freedom and independence from the family. However the research here showed that
junior high school students actually preferred high connecti vi ty wi th their fami lies
and it is becoming harder for children to gain independence from their parents.
The ideal family picture for modern day junior high school students is high
connectivity within the family in other words they tend to idealize families that
get along well.
32

1) AntonovskyA.&Sourani T. (1988). :Family Sense of Coherence and Family
aptation.]ournal of Marriage and the Family.50 79-92.
2) & (2005)..
3) (2000).-
6) (1995). Feetham.
..5(1)69-74.
26)(2003)..
30) (1999).~
31) (2001)..
.Vol.52.No. 11 1069-1082.
32) (1991).FES ():.
.8 2 456-463.
33)(1985)..
34) Olson. D. H (1990 ). Family Circumprex Model: Theory Assessment and Intervention"
Journal of FamilyPsychology Special Issue 4 pp.55-64.
35)(1986)..
34
.8:33-40.
8(2)181-192.
44) (2006).-

?
? ( )
7
8
15
J52O
? 54321
!O
5 4 3 2 .1
()
2O
1 5 4 3 2 1
2 5 4 3 2 1
3 5 4 3 2 1
4 5 4 3 2 1
5 5 4 3 2 1
6 5 4 3 2 1
7 5 4 3 2 1
8 5 4 3 2 1
9 5 4 3 2 1
10 5 4 3 2 1


1
2
3
4
5
6


Summary

Related Documents