Google Groups 11/28 PLUM Hearing Impact Report Nora Wyman Posted in group: Clerk-PLUM-Committee Nov 26, 2017 11:19 AM Hello Ms. Cheng, I am the appellant for Case Number AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A, for the property located at 453 N Stanley Ave. I have a hearing date in front of the PLUM committee this coming Tuesday, November 28th at 2:30 PM. Katie Horak, an expert architectural historian with the firm ARG, provided comments on the Project’s impacts on the Orange Grove Avenue-Gardner Street Multi-Family Residential Historic District. I am attaching her report, and it is my hope that it will be added to the file, and that the committee can receive a copy and/or review this report prior to my scheduled hearing. It provides valuable information regarding our appeal. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Nora Wyman
10
Embed
Google Groups - Los Angelesclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0641_misc_aplt_11... · 2017-11-28 · Google Groups 11/28 PLUM Hearing Impact Report Nora Wyman Posted in group: Clerk-PLUM-Committee
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Google Groups
11/28 PLUM Hearing Impact Report
Nora WymanPosted in group: Clerk-PLUM-Committee
Nov 26, 2017 11:19 AM
Hello Ms. Cheng,
I am the appellant for Case Number AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A, for the property located at 453 N Stanley Ave. I have a hearing date in front of the PLUM committee this coming Tuesday, November 28th at 2:30 PM.
Katie Horak, an expert architectural historian with the firm ARG, provided comments on the Project’s impacts on the Orange Grove Avenue-Gardner Street Multi-Family Residential Historic District.
I am attaching her report, and it is my hope that it will be added to the file, and that the committee can receive a copy and/or review this report prior to my scheduled hearing. It provides valuable information regarding our appeal.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Nora Wyman
Architectural Resources Group
8 Mills Place, Suite 300 Pasadena, California 91105 arg-la.com
MemorandumCentral Area Planning Commission City of Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, Room 1020 Los Angeles, CA 90012
To
Project: Project No.: Date:Via:
453-455 N. Stanley Ave., AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A; ENV-2016-2035-CE 17028February 27, 2017E-mail, [email protected]
Architectural Resources Group (ARG) has reviewed the City's Staff Report for the proposed project at 453-455 N. Stanley Avenue, regarding the forthcoming appeals hearing to be held Feb. 28, 2017. The report includes a plan set for the project (dated 2/20/17), which would demolish an existing duplex building (constructed in 1927) and construct a four-lot subdivision in its place. The project is located within the potential Orange Grove Avenue - Gardner Street Multi-Family Residential Historic District, which was identified as eligible against federal, state, and local criteria as part of the SurveyLA survey of the Wilshire Community Plan Area (2015).
At the request of the appellant, Save Beverly Fairfax, we are providing this evaluation of the proposed design of the new development in the context of the potential historic district, and specifically the street of multi-family residences that form its immediate setting. We understand that the project must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation in order to be granted an exemption from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA.
The Staff Report notes that the proposed project was reviewed by a qualified historic preservation architect (per the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards) and that the project meets all ten of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ARG does not agree with this finding. Specifically, the project does not comply with Standard #9.
Of the ten Standards for Rehabilitation, only #9 and #10 apply to new construction. Standard #10 states that "(n)ew additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired." Removal of the building in the future would not impact the district.
At issue, rather, is the potential impact of construction of the new building on the historic district, to which only Standard #9 applies, and the precedent that will be set with this type of new development as infill. A project may be considered to meet Standard #9 if the "new work (is) differentiated from the old and... compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment."
The Staff Report, in recommending that the project is in conformance with all ten Standards, appears content to have the project mimic the features and materials of Spanish Colonial Revival style buildings while ignoring the issues of scale and sheer size that present the greatest potential to adversely impact the district.
Size and Scale of the Project
The proposed project consists of a three-story complex of four attached dwellings. Every building on the 400 block of North Stanley Avenue is two stories in height. The third story of the new building appears to be set back at a distance of 6 feet from the plane of the front facade. It is clear from the photo simulations at the bottom of Sheet A5.0 that the setback of the third story is not substantial enough to lessen the visibility of the building's bulk and, further, that the mostly solid third-story balcony front mostly negates the small setback that is present.
The consistent size, height, and massing of the historic duplexes is the key to the cohesiveness of the block. The extensive variation in the arrangement of the facades (including some variety of styles) acts as a balance to the consistent typology of the buildings.
The forward-most portion of the street facade should be two stories high (consistent with average nearby cornice or roof lines) and follow a height and width based on most other buildings in its immediate context. Any third story should step back substantially from this point far enough that it makes a meaningful difference in the street appearance of the building's massing. The depth of a small balcony is clearly insufficient to allow the building to settle in with the neighboring buildings.
Set the bulk of the project's massing away from the street to maintain the two-story streetscape. As currently designed, the equal massing of the two buildings distributes the height equally around the site, which places too much height at the front of the property near the street. A reduction in the size of the front units to be more consistent with those in the neighborhood may be a necessary solution.
RECOMMENDATION:
AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A
Architects,Planners &
Conservators
!1
1T!Iti
Figure 1. Suggestions for massing and scale in order to be more compatible with the surrounding environment of the potential historic district. (ARG, 2017)
Massing and Architectural Features: Symmetry of the Facade
The architect of the proposed project appears to intend to distinguish the two front units by dividing the facade into two generally mirrored halves. However, the central design conceit of the typical 1920s Los Angeles duplex, particularly as seen on North Stanley Avenue, is that the casual observer should read the facade as a single unified building that resembles a larger single-family residence at first glance. This is accomplished through the organization of the elements of the facade in a composition that is balanced but not symmetrical.
The hard symmetry that regulates the facade of the proposed project is not consistent with the character of Spanish Colonial Revival duplexes or most other building types of the style. The only exception that has been made from the symmetrical facade - second-floor main window shapes - does not amount to a meaningful gesture of architectural variety. Such variety is an important component in tempering the scale of the facade.
Observe the varied and balanced placement of architectural elements seen on other fagades on the street. Eliminate the mirror effect of the two units to give each half a distinct but unified appearance.
RECOMMENDATION:
AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A
Architects,Planners &
Conservators
Ft.
yS \III I '
>1“i iiij
4
HI. ^
I III I /l! i"sr nJ!i 5?l * J1
i j
—
II -ifIBt,T •m siH •- *L-
I ✓j
i
Figure 2. Typical buildings on the 400 block of N. Stanley Avenue, showing varied fagade composition and asymmetry. (Google maps, Feb 2016)
It
1t 1T;/f Vl 4 i-- I
fi 1iit
— I4
Figure 3. Conceptual suggestion for fagade balance and asymmetry to be more compatible with the character of the surrounding environment. (ARG, 2017)
AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A
Architects,Planners &
Conservators
In conclusion, the massing, scale, and size of the building, particularly its bulk at the street, present an impact to the historic streetscape. Changing the details of the fagade without changing its size and scale will be insufficient to avoid such impacts.
Without meeting Standard #9 in being "compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features" of the proposed project's environment, an eligible historic district, the project cannot be said to meet the Standards.
Sincerely,
Katie Horak Principal
Jennifer Trotoux Senior Associate
Attached: Preparers' qualifications
AA-2016-2034-PMLA-SL-1A
Resume
,£TKATIE E. HORAKPrincipal | Architectural Historian & Preservation Planner
Katie is a Los Angeles-area native and Architectural Historian and Preservation Planner in
ARG's Pasadena office. She has more than twelve years experience in the field of historic
resource management in both the public and private sectors. Katie is a recognized leader
in the industry, bringing creative and innovative solutions to complex issues related to
historic site documentation, management, and adaptive re-use. Katie brings additional
experience with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance documentation,
historic structure reports, determinations of eligibility, design review, and Mills Act
Property Tax Abatement Program administration.
Iff"
4,r
EducationMaster of Heritage Conservation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
University of Oregon, Eugene Historic Preservation Field School in Canova, Italy
Bachelor of Arts, Art (Painting/ Drawing), Whitworth College, Spokane, Washington
Meets The Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards in Architectural History and History
Relevant Project Experience
■ Los Angeles Union Station, Historic Structures Report, Los Angeles, CA
■ SurveyLA, Los Angeles Citywide Historic Resources Survey: Citywide Historic Context
Statement (The Ranch House and Los Angeles Modernism), Pilot Survey, Groups 1, 2, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 Surveys
■ Bay Cities Guaranty Building (Clock Tower Building), Mills Act Application, Santa Monica,
CA
■ Historic Signs Survey and Ordinance Review, Burbank, CA
■ Beverly Hills Citywide Historic Resources Survey, Beverly Hills, CA
■ Dana Point Citywide Historic Resources Survey, Dana Point, CA
■ Arcadia Citywide Historic Resources Survey, Arcadia, CA
■ Santa Monica Citywide Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) Update, Santa Monica, CA
■ City of Redlands, Historic Context Statement, Redlands, CA
■ University of California, San Diego, Campus-wide Historic Resources Survey, San Diego, CA
■ View Park Historic District National Register Nomination, Los Angeles County, CA
■ Village Green, Historic Structures Report and Mills Act Application, Los Angeles, CA
■ Miracle Mile Historic Preservation Overlay Zone, Historic Resources Survey, Los Angeles, CA
■ Jefferson Park Historic Preservation Overlay Zone, Historic Resources Survey, Los Angeles, CA