are your design guidelines
pointing in the right
direction?3
Zoni
ng P
ract
ice
AMER
ICAN
PLA
NNIN
G AS
SOCI
ATIO
N
205
N. M
ichi
gan
Ave.
Suite
120
0
Chic
ago,
IL 6
0601
–592
7
1030
15t
h St
reet
, NW
Suite
750
Wes
t
Was
hing
ton,
DC
2000
5–15
03
zONING Practice MARCh 2011
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
3issue number 3
Practice design guidelines
GOOD CATCHZONING PRACTICE
Each issue helps you build your reference collection
Smart practice is best practice.
ZONING PRACTICE can help you practice smart.
Every month, it shows you what’s working in other
communities and how you can make it work in
yours. It’s both an up-to-the-minute bulletin and a
reference you’ll turn to for years.
Innovative ideas with practical applications help you write and administer smarter development codes.
Published by the American Planning Association to help you create communities of lasting value.
Learn the latest on zoning practices from inclusionary housing to site visits to rural development.
are your design guidelinespointing in the right direction? 3
Zon
ing
Pr
acti
ceA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
205
N. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
120
0C
hic
ago,
IL 6
06
01–
5927
1030
15t
h S
tree
t, N
WS
uite
750
Wes
tW
ash
ingt
on, D
C 20
00
5–15
03
zONING Practice MARCh 2011
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
3
issue number 3
Practice design guidelines
zoningpractice 3.11AmericAN PlANNiNg AssociAtioN | page 2
Creating Design guidelines That Work: Empowering the Local PlannerBy Douglas Hammel, aicp
Creating interesting urban places is not easy.
The local planner faces so many chal-lenges—establishing the vision, aligning development policies, leveraging the market for investment, assessing the municipal role in implementation, administering the zoning and development review process—that any bump in the road can result in an unbuilt project, or just as bad, a built project that compromises the goals of the town for the next half-century.
one tool municipalities use to shape in-vestment is design guidelines. While design guidelines have become common, many communities find them ineffective. Listening to their experiences offers clues as to why:• “They don’t match the look of our town.”
scenario, design guidelines can get saddled with the most incriminating claim—that they drove development away—though this end is often the result of other symptoms rather than a cause in and of itself. in fact, it is often the case that well-crafted design guidelines can streamline the development process by providing clear expectations that remove arbitrary decision making and inter-pretation.
This article sets forth some fundamen-tal principles to follow while developing design guidelines. (note: For the most part, design guidelines and form-based code can be used interchangeably in this article. Many of the principles are the same, even if the levels of codification or the administra-tive processes vary.) it will pose a series of key questions to be asked prior to the development of design guidelines that aim to proactively address the sentiments stated above.
What are Design guiDelines?Before developing design guidelines, it is helpful to have a realistic understanding of what they are, or more importantly, ought to be. Too often, guidelines are developed with little regard to physical, political, market, or regulatory contexts. The result is ideals that have little relevance to what can be. This sets the guidelines up for failure before they are even adopted. Consider the following as a working definition for design guidelines in this article:
Design guidelines should be an articulation of appropriate and acceptable development solu-tions to contextual challenges and goals
guidelines should be appropriate and acceptable—not necessarily ideal—since an “ideal” may not work for a given location based on a number of local factors, and they must address contextual challenges and goals because every community’s vision, process, and policy climate is different.
These illustrative plan images show some of the basic site and building characteristics that can be addressed through design guidelines.
Cam
iros
, Ltd
. (cl
ient
: Des
Pla
ines
, ilin
ois)
• “i’m not sure what they’re requiring me to do.”
• “i can’t figure out how to use the docu-ment.”
• “The design guidelines say one thing, but the zoning ordinance says another.”
• “i’m not a designer, so who am i to deter-mine what good design is?”
All of these statements, whether ut-tered by designers, developers, engaged citizens, or design reviewers, are symptom-atic of broken guidelines, and the more broken the guidelines are, the easier it is to leave them on the shelf. in the worst-case
Get your hands
on the ultimate
zoning reference –
ZONING PRACTICE
In-depth articles from some of the best minds in planning help you envision new possibilities.
ZP shows you how diagrams, renderings, and other visuals can enhance the impact of development proposals and guidelines.
ZP directs you to the essential principles behind critical land-use issues.
Your ZP subscription has valuable extras!
• ZONING PRACTICE has been giving planners expert advice since 2004. Your subscription gives you online access to the entire ZP archive. You’ll find yourself referring to past issues again and again to find solutions to today’s tough problems.
• Onceamonth,you’llreceive ZP+, an e-newsletter that complements each new issue of ZONING PRACTICE with profiles and pictures of ZP authors, highlights from the ZP archives, a wrapup of the previous month’s Ask the Author online forum, and more.
Subscribe today!
Experts answer questions in Ask the Author, an online forum.
Web-based enhancements for subscribers include maps, illustrations, and links to source documents.
ZP gives you precise, practical tips to sharpen your solutions to challeng-ing local zoning problems.
Ask ThE AuThor Join us onLinE!
about the authorDouglas hammel, aicp, is an urban de-signer and senior associate at Camiros, Ltd. he has developed design guidelines and form-based codes for several com-munities, either as specific assignments or as part of comprehensive or subarea planning assignments.
Go online during the month of March to participate in our “Ask the Author” forum, an interac-tive feature of zoning Practice. Douglas Hammel, aicp, will be available to answer questions about this article. Go to the APA website at www.planning.org and follow the links to the Ask the Author section. From there, just submit your questions about the article using the e-mail link. The author will reply, and zoning Practice will post the answers cumulatively on the web-site for the benefit of all subscribers. This feature will be available for selected issues of zon-ing Practice at announced times. After each online discussion is closed, the answers will be saved in an online archive available through the APA Zoning Practice web pages.
zoningpractice 3.11AmericAN PlANNiNg AssociAtioN | page 3
What aspects of Design shoulD they control?Many communities struggle with this broad question, but there are actually many clues in local policy and context that quickly give shape to a concrete answer.
clue #1: the local VisionComprehensive plans, subarea plans, and other policy documents establish a vision with varying levels of detail. Many of these plans include, at a minimum, illustrative plans that imply some of the basic character-istics of physical development: the relation-ship between building/parking/street, scale and intensity, mix of use, and site and build-ing access. others delve more deeply into the characteristics of development: architectural styles, materials, commercial storefront design, public realm improvements, and so on. All these imply characteristics of desired development that can inform design policy.
clue #2: the existing Built contextAssuming there is a clearly stated vision, one can compare and contrast it against the exist-ing built environment to determine the key design elements that need to be addressed. This will also illustrate the magnitude of the challenge. is the vision close to reality, mean-ing the design guidelines can focus on details and retrofitting an existing environment, or are
the two so different that the design guidelines must address the big ideas to make sure the stage is set for transformation over time?
clue #3: the regulatory contextone of the simplest exercises is to ask what the existing ordinance does not address. Traditional zoning focuses on mitigating the impacts of development on adjacent proper-ties. Design guidelines can complement this by either tightening up requirements (i.e., build-to zones instead of typical required set-backs) or introducing new controls related to building massing, materials, site and build-ing access, facade design, and landscaping.
Collectively, these clues can focus the attention in the drafting of design guidelines to those characteristics of development that represent local tastes and accomplish the primary design objectives.
What forces shape the Design guiDelines?You’ve determined that the specific location of a building on its site is important. now what is the appropriate setback related to the public right-of-way? What should happen between the front of the building and the sidewalk? Where should parking be located, and how should it be accessed to best serve the building? The answers to these and many other questions become the heart of the design guidelines. Any characteristic of
When assessing existing conditions, it can be helpful to look at satellite images to see variations in parcel, street, and block types from place to place.
© 20
11 google
design—whether it is building location and scale, landscape palette, style, awning form, etc.—must be described with enough detail to demonstrate the design intent and define the metrics necessary for users to interpret it. Determining what that specific intent is and what the metrics are for assessing is not always easy, but there are several techniques to assist the authors.
focused VisioningAs mentioned earlier, planning documents and policies can provide clues about the intended vision of a community. however, these plans may not specifically address the geographic area design issue at hand. in many cases, focused visioning can concen-trate the community on the specific question, “What should this type of development in this part of our town look like?” image prefer-ence surveys are an effective tool for this, and the most effective surveys use street-level photographs of sample development types. This offers the audience the same perspec-tive through which they would experience their own built environment. it is then the role of the author to translate the input into plans, elevations, perspectives, or diagrams.
assessment of the Built contextin order to turn the “ideal” into the “accept-able and appropriate,” preferred development
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE August 2008
ISSUE NUMBER EIGHT
PRACTICE CONSISTENCY
8
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE November 2008
ISSUE NUMBER ELEVEN
PRACTICE RURAL ZONING
11
1
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE December 2007
ISSUE NUMBER TWELVE
PRACTICE TDRs
2
ZON
ING
PR
ACTI
CEA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
122
S. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
16
00
Ch
icag
o, IL
60
603
1776
Mas
sach
uset
ts A
ve.,
N/.
W.
Was
hin
gton
, D.C
. 20
036
HAVE YOU MADE ROOM FOR STREET MARKETS AND PUBLIC VENDORS? 2
ZONING PRACTICE FEBRUARY 2009
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
2
ISSUE NUMBER 2
PRACTICE PUBLIC MARKETS
ZON
ING
PR
ACTI
CEA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
122
S. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
16
00
Ch
icag
o, IL
60
603
1776
Mas
sach
uset
ts A
ve.,
N.W
.W
ash
ingt
on, D
.C. 2
003
6
HOW MUCH DOES FREEPARKING COST?
6
ZONING PRACTICE JUNE 2009
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
6
ISSUE NUMBER 6
PRACTICE PARKING MANAGEMENT
ZON
ING
PR
ACTI
CEA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
122
S. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
16
00
Ch
icag
o, IL
60
603
1776
Mas
sach
uset
ts A
ve.,
N/.
W.
Was
hin
gton
, D.C
. 20
036
DOES YOUR COMMUNITY KNOW HOW TO ACCOMMODATE INCREASED DENSITY? 5
ZONING PRACTICE MAY 2009
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
5ISSUE NUMBER 5
PRACTICE DENSITY
ZON
ING
PR
ACTI
CEA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
122
S. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
16
00
Ch
icag
o, IL
60
603
1776
Mas
sach
uset
ts A
ve.,
N/.
W.
Was
hin
gton
, D.C
. 20
036
DOES YOUR COMMUNITY ENCOURAGE RESIDENTIAL SOLAR INSTALLATIONS?
4
ZONING PRACTICE APRIL 2009
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ISSUE NUMBER 4
PRACTICE SOLAR ACCESS
4
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE May 2007
5ISSUE NUMBER FIVE
PRACTICE TOWN CENTER ZONING
5
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE May 2008
ISSUE NUMBER FIVE
PRACTICE HYBRID CODING
1
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE November 2007
ISSUE NUMBER ELEVEN
PRACTICE SITE PLAN REVIEW
1 6
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE June 2007
ISSUE NUMBER SIX
PRACTICE PUDs
ISSUE NUMBER ONE
PRACTICE HABITAT PROTECTION
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE January 2007
1
7ISSUE NUMBER SEVEN
PRACTICE RENEWABLE ENERGY
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE July 2008
1
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE January 2008
ISSUE NUMBER ONE
PRACTICE LAND SUPPLY MONITORING
1
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE October 2007
ISSUE NUMBER TEN
PRACTICE DOWNTOWN DIVERSITY
0
ISSUE NUMBER THREE
PRACTICE HOUSING INCLUSION
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
3
ZONINGPRACTICE March 2007
Catch
ZONINGPRACTICE
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE November 2008
ISSUE NUMBER ELEVEN
PRACTICE RURAL ZONING
11
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE May 2007
5ISSUE NUMBER FIVE
PRACTICE TOWN CENTER ZONING
5
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE May 2008
ISSUE NUMBER FIVE
PRACTICE HYBRID CODING
6
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE June 2007
ISSUE NUMBER SIX
PRACTICE PUDs
7ISSUE NUMBER SEVEN
PRACTICE RENEWABLE ENERGY
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE July 2008
1
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE October 2007
ISSUE
NUMBER TEN
PRACTICE DOWNTOWN DIVERSITY
0
ISSUE NUMBER THREE
PRACTICE HOUSING INCLUSION
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
3
ZONINGPRACTICE March 2007
ISSUE NUMBER ONE
PRACTICE HABITAT PROTECTION
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ZONINGPRACTICE January 2007
1
2
Zon
ing
Pr
acti
ceA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
205
N. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
120
0C
hic
ago,
IL 6
06
01–
5927
1030
15t
h S
tree
t, N
WS
uite
750
Wes
tW
ash
ingt
on, D
C 20
00
5–15
03
zONING Practice fEbRuARy 2011
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
is it time to rethink your community’s commercial strips? 2
issue number 2
Practice corridor Planning
Click here to read a sample issue of ZONING PRACTICE.
Zon
ing
Pr
acti
ceA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
205
N. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
120
0C
hic
ago,
IL 6
06
01–
5927
1030
15t
h S
tree
t, N
WS
uite
750
Wes
tW
ash
ingt
on, D
C 20
00
5–15
03
zONING Practice DECEMbER 2010
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
issue number 12
Practice community character
what is community character?
12 12
HOW dOes yOur cOmmunity integrate public HealtH intO develOpment revieW?1
ZOn
ing
Pr
acti
ceA
MER
ICA
N P
LAN
NIN
G A
SSO
CIA
TIO
N
205
N. M
ich
igan
Ave
.S
uite
120
0C
hic
ago,
IL 6
06
01–
5927
1030
15t
h S
tree
t, N
WS
uite
750
Wes
tW
ash
ingt
on, D
C 20
00
5–15
03
zoning Practice october 2011
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
100
issue number 10
Practice health imPact assessment
APA ID
Name Circle one: Mr. Ms. Mrs.
Employer
O�ce Address
City State ZIP
O�ce Phone Fax No.
Home Address
City State ZIP
Home Phone
E-Mail Address (Required)
Payment Method[ ] Check enclosed, payable to APA[ ] Charge: MasterCard _____ Visa _____ American Express _____[ ] Bill me (Subscription will begin when invoice is paid.)
Cardholder Name
Cardholder Signature (required)
Card Number Expiration Date
Billing address for credit card is: [ ] O�ce Address [ ] Home Address
Z9 — A B C D E G H J K M P Q R T V Z
Please tell us where to send correspondence from APA.
Send invoices to:[ ] O�ce Address [ ] Home Address Send publications to: [ ] O�ce Address [ ] Home Address
To get this special offer, print, complete, and return this order form to APA. American Planning Association97774 Eagle WayChicago, IL 60678-9770Fax credit card payments to 312-786-6700
Yes, I want to subscribe to ZONING PRACTICE and get six free issues!
12 18 issues @ $95($120 outside the U.S.)
Z 1 2 X