Case Copenhagen Cycle Track Workshop, CIP
Conference 2013
Andreas Røhl, Head of Bicycle Programme,
City of Copenhagen (10 months with Urban
Systems in 2012)
Why cycle tracks
Cycle track design: Current focus in Cph
Public engagement process – Examples
Content
Quality matters
+18%
+55%
Modal split; effect of cycle tracks:
4% to 55% increase in cycling
volume
1% to 30% of increase due to modal
change or new trips
Tryghed før og efter anlæg af cykelstier
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Meget utryg - 10 Meget tryg
Pro
cen
t
Stormgade før Stormgade efter
”Fantastic with the cycle tracks”
”Very happy with the cycle track. More Please”
”We NEED cycle tracks!”
Source: CityStop interviews
Percieved safety
- before and after
1: Very unsafe 10: Very safe
Perceived safety before and after
- Cycle Tracks Stormgade
Cykeltrafikarbejde
1989-2012
mio. km pr. dag
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Cykeltrafikarbejde
Kilometers cycled in Copenhagen - Million km per day, 1989-2012
33,900
31,000
25,800 24,000
20,200
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Nørrebrogade Knippelsbro Langebro Gyldenløvsgade Torvegade
Eksempler, højt trafikerede strækninger cykler, årsdøgnstrafik 2011
Streets with high cycling volumes (examples) - Yearly average, bicycles per day
ITS solutions: •”Before green”
•Dynamic green wawes
•Personalized green wawes
•Flexible use of space during the day
.
Information combined with infrastructure
”Good Cycling
etiquette”
33 % has noticed
89% positive
Difficult to measure
exact effect on
capacity
Bredere cykelstier gør en forskel
• Større kapacitet - lavere rejsetid
• Mere plads til cyklister og fodgængere
Dr. Louises Bro (before and after)
Østerbrogade 2011
Extra space if needed
(and possible): * Three travel lanes each direction
* 3 meter wide
2007
2011