Page 1
8/9/2019 Trotter Wwi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/trotter-wwi 1/4
The Great MigrationAuthor(s): Joe William Trotter, Jr.Source: Magazine of History, Vol. 17, No. 1, World War I (Oct., 2002), pp. 31-33Published by: Organization of American Historians
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25163561Accessed: 17/04/2010 15:21
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=oah.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Organization of American Historians is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Magazine of History.
Page 2
8/9/2019 Trotter Wwi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/trotter-wwi 2/4
Joe
William
Trotter
Jr.
The
Great
Migration
F'rom
the
onset
of the
international slave
trade
through
recent
times,
migration
has been
a
persistent
theme
in
African
American
history.
Yet,
only
with the advent
ofthe
Civil
War
and
emancipation
did
black
population
movement
take
on a
voluntary
character,
slowly
converging
with that of
other
groups.
With the
coming
ofWorld
War
I
and
its
aftermath,
blacks
made a fundamental break with
the
land
and
move
into
cities
in
large
numbers. The Great
Migra
tion
ofthe
early
twentieth
century
foreshadowed
the
long
run
trans
formation of African Americans
from
a
predominantly
rural
to
a
predominantly
urban
population.
It
not
only
reflected the African
Americans'
quest
for
freedom,
jobs,
and
social
justice,
but also the
emer
gence
of
new
patterns
of
race,
class,
and
ethnic relations
in
American
culture, society, and politics.
As
a
result of World War
I,
an
estimated
seven
hundred
thousand
to
one
million
blacks
left
the South.
Another
eight
hundred
thousand
to
one
million
left
during
the
1920s.
Although
the
prewar
migrants
moved
to
southern
cities
like
Norfolk,
Louisville,
Birmingham,
and
Atlanta
as
well
as
to
a
few northern
cities
like
Chicago,
Philadelphia,
and
New
York,
African Ameri
cans now
moved
throughout
the urban North and West
(see
table).
Moreover,
while
upper
South and border
states
repre
sented the chief
sources
of
out-migration
before
World War
I,
Deep
South
states
dominated the
migration
stream to
northern
and
western
cities.
Blacks born
in
Mississippi,
Alabama,
Georgia,
South
Carolina,
and
Louisiana,
for
example,
made
up
over
sixty
percent
ofthe black
population
increase
in
Chicago
(and
Illinois
in
general)
between 1910 and 1920. At
the
same
time,
more
black
men
than
women
migrated
during
the
war,
reversing
the
prewar
trend.
In
the
rapidly
industrializing
cities
of
Cleveland, Detroit,
and
Milwau
kee,
for
example,
the
sex
ratio
ranged
between
one
hundred
twenty to one hundred
forty
men to
every
one
hundred
women
during
the
war
years.
A
variety
of
factors
underlay
black
population
movement.
Afri
can
Americans
sought
an
alterna
tive
to
sharecropping,
disfranchisement,
and racial
injus
tice
in
the South.
In
1917,
the
African
Methodist
American
Church
Review
articulated
the forces that
propelled
blacks
out
of the
South.
Neither
character,
the
accumula
tion of property, the fostering of the Church, the schools and a
better
and
higher
standard of the
home had
made
a
difference
in
the
status
of black
southerners.
Confidence
in
the
sense
of
justice,
humanity
and
fair
play
of the white South
is
gone,
the
paper
concluded. One
migrant
articulated
the
same
mood
in
verse:
An'
let
one
race
have all de
South?Where
color lines
are
drawn?For
'Hagar's
child' done
[stem]
de
tide?Farewell?we're
good
and
gone.
African Americans
were
also
attracted
by
the
pull
of
opportu
nities in
the North. The
labor
demands
of northern
industries,
immigration
restriction
legislation,
and
greater
access
to
the
rights
of
citizens
(including
the
franchise)
all
encouraged
the
movement
... ' '.
:
'
m&Jk-
~*
^jfc3^mmm&^r~
^
-Mmmw^\^y^jm
m
;:;-;p:-.Wft.i;
-
,
'.j;
;-
V
,
....*,.
J,.S:.;fl.^fe
l^.:
%
l B.
, _
-,
:
.
'
,<
;,,
^v^fe; ?
-8:
j,
J
?^1
V
:
..'
ni|.|l
%ff-^
'::
'
I
i
fratt|f
^aai^f.^ftffrtafttflttff
Mart
fflHHtotffim
mHh,
.'
OAH Magazine
of
History
October 2002
31
Page 3
8/9/2019 Trotter Wwi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/trotter-wwi 3/4
of
blacks
into
northern
cities.
Wages
in
northern industries
usually
ranged
from
$3
to
$5
per
eight-hour
day,
compared
to
as
little
as
$.75
to
$1 per
day
in
southern
agriculture
and
to
no more
than
$2.50
for
a
nine-hour
day
in
southern industries.
Moreover,
between
1915
and
1925,
the
average wages
of
domestics
in
some
northern
cities
doubled. Northern
cities
also
promised
access to
better health care, schools, and the vote.
African Americans
often viewed the
Great
Migration
to
northern
cities
in
glowing
terms:
The
Promised
Land,
the
Flight
out
of
Egypt,
and
Going
into
Canaan. One black
man
wrote
back
to
his southern
home,
The
(Col.)
men
are
making
good.
[The
job]
never
pays
less than
$3.00 per
day
for
(10)
hours.
In
her letter
home,
a
black
female
related,
I
am
well
and
thankful
to
say
I
am
doing
well
...
I
work
in
Swifts
Packing
Com
pany. Up
here,
another
migrant
said,
Our
people
are
in
a
different
light.
Over
and
over
again,
African Americans
con
firmed that:
Up
here,
a man can
be
a
man. As one southern black man wrote
home
from the
North,
I
should
have
been
here
twenty
years ago
...
I
just
begin
to
feel
like
a
man...
My
children
are
going
to
the
same
school
with the
whites and
I
don't have
to
humble
to
no
one.
I
have
registered.
Will
vote
in
the
next
election
and there
isn't
any yes
Sir
or
no
Sir. It's
all
yes
and
no,
Sam
and
Bill.
The Great
Migration
was
by
no means
a
simple
move
from
southern
agriculture
to
northern
cities.
It
had
specific regional
and
sub-regional
components.
More
blacks migrated to southern cities between
1900 and
1920 than
to
northern
ones.
Further,
African
Americans
frequently
comprised
from
twenty-five
to
fifty
per
cent
of the
total,
compared
to
little
more
than
ten
percent
in
northern
cities.
Be
fore
moving
to
northern
cities
like Phila
delphia,
Boston,
and
New
York,
for
example,
rural
migrants
first
moved
to
southern
cities
like
New
Orleans,
Jack
sonville,
Savannah,
Memphis,
Charles
ton,
and
Birmingham.
The
Southern,
Louisville,
Nashville,
the
St.
Louis and
San
Francisco,
and
the
Illinois Central railroads all traveled northward
from
Birmingham
and
Bessemer,
making
the
Jefferson County
cities
the
major
distribution
points
for blacks
going
north
from
Alabama.
In
Georgia,
cities
like
Columbus,
Americus,
and
Albany
served
as
distribution
points
for
blacks
leaving
from
west
Georgia
and
east
Alabama,
while
Valdosta,
Waycross,
Brunswick,
and
Savannah
served
as
distribution
centers
for blacks
leaving
the
depressed
agricultural
counties of southern and southeastern
Georgia.
To
blacks
moving
up
from
Mississippi,
Arkansas,
Alabama,
Louisi
ana,
and
Texas,
Chicago
was
the
logical
destination,
whereas
cities
in
Pennsylvania,
New
Jersey,
New
York,
and the
New
England
states
attracted
blacks
from
Florida,
South
Carolina,
Virginia,
and
Georgia. Upon
arrival
in
northern
cities,
black
population
movement
usually developed
secondary
streams.
As
one
contemporary
observer
noted,
All
of the arrivals here
[Chi
cago]
did
not
stay.
. . .
They
were
only
temporary
guests
awaiting
the
opportunity
to
proceed
further and settle
in
surrounding
cities
and
towns.
Southern blacks helped to organize their own movement into
the urban North.
They developed
an
extensive communications
network,
which included railroad
employees,
who
traveled back
and
forth between northern and southern
cities;
northern
black
weeklies
like
the
Chicago Defender
and the
Pittsburgh
Courier;
and
an
expanding
chain of kin and friends.
Using
their networks of families
and
friends,
African Americans
learned
about
transportation,
jobs,
and
housing
beforehand.
As
one
contemporary
ob
server
noted,
The
chief
stimuli
was
dis
cussion.
.
. .
The
talk
in
the barber
shops
and
grocery
stores
.
. .
soon
began
to
take
the form of
reasons
for
leaving.
Also
fueling the migration process were the
letters,
money,
and
testimonies
of
migrants
who returned
to
visit.
As
one
South
Carolina
migrant
to
Pittsburgh
recalled,
I
was
plowing
in
the field and
it
was
real hot.
And
I
stayed
with
some
of the
boys
who
would
leave
home
and
[come]
back... and
would
have
money,
and
they
had clothes.
I
didn't have that.
We
all
grew up
together.
And
I
said,
'Well,
as
long
as
I
stay
here I'm
going
to
get
nowhere.'
And
I
tied
that
mule
to
a
tree
and
caught
a
train.
Other
migrants
formed
migration
clubs, pooled their resources, and
moved
in
groups.
Deeply
enmeshed
in
black kin
and
friendship
networks,
black
women
played
a
conspicuous
role
in
helping
to
organize
the black
migra
tion.
As
recent
scholarship
suggests,
women were
the
primary
kin
keep
ers.
Moreover,
they
often
had their
own
gender-specific
reasons
for leav
ing
the
rural
South.
African American
women
resented
stereotyped
images
of
the
black
mammy
,
who
presumably
placed
loyalty
to
white
families
above
her
own.
African
American
women's
migration
reinforced
the
notion
that
lifting
the
race
and
improving
the
image
of black
women
were
compatible
goals.
As African Americans
moved
into
northern
cities
in
growing
numbers,
a
black
industrial
working
class
emerged.
Southern
black
sharecroppers,
farm
laborers,
sawmill
hands,
dock
workers,
and
railroad
hands all
moved
into
new
positions
in
the urban
economy.
In
Cleveland,
Pittsburgh,
Detroit,
and
Milwaukee,
the
percentage
of
black
men
employed
in
industrial
jobs
increased
from
an
estimated
ten
to
twenty
percent
of
the
black
labor
force
in
1910
to
about
sixty
to
seventy
percent
in
1920 and
1930.
African American
women
also
entered
industrial
jobs,
although
BAPTIST
MEK
ME
PROBLEM
The
Ohio
Colored
Baptist
Women's
association,
during
its
eleventh
an
nual
convention at
the
Mount
Haven
Baptist
church,
3725
Cedar
avenue
S.
E.,
took
up
the
problem
of
looking
after
thousands
of
Colored
children
who
have
come
into
the
state
recently
pom
the
south.
The
rush
of
Colored
laborers
and
their
families to
northern
states in
the
last
few
months
has
brought
this
prob
lem
of children
directly
up
to
Colored
Baptists
and
mission
workers._
Newly
arrived
African
Americans,
removed
from
extended
families,
had
no one
to
watch their children
while
they
went to work.
This
article
appeared
in the
Cleveland
Advocate,
27 October 1917.
(Ohio
Historical
Center
Archives,
also
a
part
of the American
Memory
collections
at
the
Library
of
Congress.)
32 OAH Magazine of History October 2002
Page 4
8/9/2019 Trotter Wwi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/trotter-wwi 4/4
their
gains
were
far less than those of black
men.
In
Chicago,
the
percentage
of black
women
in
manufacturing
trades increased
from
less than
one
thousand
in
1910
to
over
three thousand
in
1920.
Industrial
jobs
now
made
up
fifteen
percent
of the
black
female labor
force
compared
to
less than
seven
percent
in
1910.
While
labor
agents helped
to
recruit
black workers for
jobs
in
meatpacking,
auto,
steel,
and other
mass
production
industries,
these
labor
agents
were soon
supplanted by
the
expansion
of black
familial and communal networks.
Employers
testified
that,
After
the
initial
group
movement
by
agents,
Negroes kept going
by
twos
and
threes.
These
were
drawn
by
letters,
and
by
actual advances
of
money,
from
Negroes
who had
already
settled
in
the North.
.
.
.
every
Negro
that makes
good
in
the
North and
writes
back
to
his
friends
starts
off
a
new
group.
Although
African
Americans
improved
their lot
by taking
jobs
in
urban
industries,
they
nonetheless
entered
the
industrial
economy
at
the lowest
rungs
of the
occupational
ladder.
More
over,
as
their numbers increased
in
northern and
western
cities,
they
faced
growing
restrictions
on
where
they
could
stay,
educate
their
children,
and
gain
access
to
much needed social
services
and
public
accommodations. Race
violence
erupted
in
Chicago,
East
St.
Louis,
Pittsburgh,
and
Philadelphia during
the
era
ofthe Great
Migration.
Race
riots
not
only
helped
to
reinforce residential
segregation
in
northern
cities,
they highlighted
the
growing
nationalization
of
the
race
question
in
American
society.
African
Americans
responded
to
the
impact
of
class and racial
restrictions
on
their lives
by intensifying
their
institution-build
ing,
cultural,
political,
economic,
and
civil
rights
activities.
They
built
churches,
mutual
aid
societies,
fraternal
orders,
and social
clubs;
established
a
range
of
new
business and
professional
ser
vices;
and launched diverse
labor,
civil
rights,
and
political
orga
nizations.
These
activities
culminated
in
the
rise
of
the
New
Negro
movement
during
World
War
I
and
its
flourishing during
the
1920s.
The
Garvey
Movement,
the
cultural
renaissance
in
Harlem and
elsewhere,
the
growing
militancy
of
the
National
Association for
the Advancement of
Colored
People,
the
spread
of the
National
Urban
League
movement,
and
the
emergence
of
the
Brotherhood of
Sleeping
Car Porters
gained
stimulus from
the
mass
migration
of
blacks from the
rural and
urban South
into
the
cities
of the North and West.
As
the
nation
entered
the
Depression
and World
War
II,
the
Great
Migration
continued
to
transform
both black and white
America. The
technological
revolution
in
southern
agriculture,
the
emergence
of
the
New
Deal welfare
state,
and the militant
modern civil
rights
and
black
power
movements
ofthe
1950s
and
1960s,
all
helped
to
complete
the
long-run
transformation of
blacks
from
a
predominantly
rural
to
a
predominantly
urban
people. By
1970,
African
Americans,
beginning
as
the
most
rural
of
Americans,
had
not
only
become the
most
urbanized
segment
ofthe
U.S.
population,
they
also
posed
the
most
salient
challenge
to
the nation's
status
quo.
Note:
The author wishes to thank Macmillan
Publishing
Company
for
permission
to
reprint
portions
of
his
essay
on
black
population
movement,
in
Jack
Saltzman,
ed.,
Encyclopedia
of African
American Culture and
History (1996).
Bibliography
Grossman,
James
R.
Land
of Hope:
Chicago,
Black
Southerners,
and the
Great
Migration.
Chicago,
IL:
University
of
Chicago
Press,
1989.
Harrison, Alferdteen. Black Exodus: The Great Migration from theAmerican South.
Jackson,
MS:
University
of
Mississippi
Press,
1991.
Lemann,
Nicholas. The
Promised Land: The Great
Black
Migration
and
How
it
Changed
America. New
York:
Alfred A.
Knopf,
1991.
Marks,
Carole.
Farewell?We're
Good and Gone:
The Great
Migration.
Bloomington,
IN:
Indiana
University
Press,
1989.
Painter,
Nell Irvin.
Exodusters: Black
Migration
to
Kansas
after
Reconstruction.
New
York:
Knopf,
1977.
Trotter,
Joe
William,
Jr.,
ed.
The Great
Migration
in
Historical
Perspective:
New
Dimensions
of
Race, Class,
and Gender.
Bloomington,
IN:
Indiana Univer
sity
Press,
1991.
Trotter,
Joe
William,
Jr.,
Afro-American
Urban
History:
A
Critique
of
the
Literature,
in
Joe
William
Trotter,
Jr.,
Black Milwaukee:
The
Making of
an
Industrial
Proletariat,
1915-45.
Urbana,
IL:
University
of
Illinois
Press,
1985.
Trotter,
Joe
William,
Jr.,
The
African
American
Experience.
Boston,
MA:
Houghton
Mifflin
Company,
2001.
Joe
William
Trotter
Jr.
is
Department
Head
and Mellon
Professor
of
History
at
Carnegie
Mellon
University.
He
is
currently
President
ofthe
Labor
and
Working
Class
History
Association
and directs
Carnegie
Mellon
s
Center
for
African
American
Urban Studies
and the
Economy
(CAUSE).
As
well
as
several
scholarly
essays, books,
and
edited
volumes
on
African
American
urban
and
Labor
history,
he
is
also the
author
of
the
college
textbook,
The
African
American
Experience
(Boston:
Houghton
Mifflin,
2001).
4
Continued
from
page
30
States would
help
defeat
Germany
but also
prevent
a
vengeful
peace
by
the
Allies?see
John
Milton
Cooper, Jr.,
The Warrior and
the Priest: Woodrow
Wilson
and Theodore Roosevelt
(Cambridge,
MA:
The
Belknap
Press of
Harvard
University
Press, 1983),
288-333.
24-
Wilson
visited the
State,
War,
and
Navy Department
Building
from
4:00
to
4:30
p.m.
on
Monday,
26 March
1917,
see
Head Usher's White
House
Diary,
1913-1921. The
president
probably
returned
the
telegram
to
Baker
after
the
cabinet
meeting
that
began
at
2:30
p.m.,
Tuesday,
27 March
1917.
Time
ofthe
cabinet
meeting
recorded
in
Executive
Office
Diary.
The
late
Arthur
S. Link
kindly
allowed
me
to
consult
this
in
the
Office
of the
Papers
of
Woodrow
Wilson,
Firestone
Library,
Princeton
University.
25. 28 March
conference
of
Baker
and
the
generals
to
go
over
the
new
conscrip
tion
plan reported
in
Crowder
to
Stimson,
29
March, 1917,
cited earlier.
Baker
delivered
to
the
president
Crowder's
two-page summary
ofthe bill
to
increase
temporarily
the
military
indicating
that the
Additional Forces
would
be raised
solely by
selective
conscription.
Baker
to
Wilson,
29
March
1917,
and
enclosure
cited
earlier.
26.
On the
battle
over
conscription
in
Congress,
which
is
when
the Roosevelt
Volunteers became
a
public issue,
see
Chambers, To Raise
an
Army, 153-77.
27.
Chambers,
To Raise
an
Army,
144-51;
Arthur S.
Link,
Woodrow Wilson:
Revolution,
War
and Peace
(Arlington
HeightsJL:
AHM
Publishing Corpo
ration,
1979),
69-71;
and
Allan R.
Miilett,
Over Where?
The
AEF
and
the
American
Strategy
for
Victory,
1917-1918,
in
Kenneth
J.
Hagan
and
William R.
Roberts, eds.,
Against
All Enemies:
Interpretations of
American
Military
History from
Colonial
Times
to
the Present
(Westport,CT:
Green
wood
Press,
1986),
235-56.
John
Whiteclay
Chambers
II
is
professor
and
former
chair
ofthe
History Department
at
Rutgers
University,
New
Brunswick,
New
Jersey.
Two
of
his
books,
To
Raise
an
Army:
The Draft
Comes
to
Modem
America
(1987)
and
The
Oxford
Companion
to
American
Military
History
(1999),
won
Distinguished
Book
Awards
from
the
Society for
Military
History.
OAH
Magazine
of
History
October
2002 33