Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net satisfaction ... · 3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 6 November 2019, page 3 of 20 By sex, it stayed at very

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey

SWS MEDIA RELEASE

6 November 2019, page 1 of 20

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Website: www.sws.org.ph

Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465

Fax: 920-2181

pr20191106 - Satisfaction with National Admin Overall and on Issues (media release).docx

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey:

Net satisfaction rating of the National Administration at “Very Good” +67

• “Very Good” on 3 subjects, “Good” on 11, “Moderate” on 1, “Neutral” on 1

• “Excellent” in Metro Manila, the Visayas and Mindanao, “Very Good” in

Balance Luzon

Social Weather Stations

The Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey, done on September 27-30, 2019, found 77% of

adult Filipinos satisfied, 11% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 10% dissatisfied with the general

performance of the current National Administration, for a net satisfaction rating of +67 (% satisfied minus

% dissatisfied), classified by SWS as very good.

This is 6 points below the record-high excellent +73 (82% satisfied, 9% dissatisfied) in June 2019,

and similar to the very good +66 in December 2018 [Chart 1; Table 1].

The SWS terminology for net satisfaction ratings is as follows: +70 and above, “excellent”; +50

to +69, “very good”; +30 to +49, “good”; +10 to +29, “moderate”, +9 to –9, “neutral”; –10 to –29,

“poor”; –30 to –49, “bad”; –50 to –69, “very bad”; –70 and below, “execrable”. SWS considers the

movement from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade”.

“Very Good” on 3 subjects, “Good” on 11, “Moderate” on 1, “Neutral” on 1

Out of 16 specific performance subjects rated, net satisfaction ratings of the Duterte

Administration were very good on 3 subjects, good on 11 subjects, moderate on 1 subject, and neutral on

1 subject. SWS calls this its Governance Report Card [Tables 2 and 3].

The net satisfaction rating of the National Administration was very good on: Helping the poor

(+62), Providing information needed by the citizens to properly examine what the government is doing

(+54), and Having clear policies (+53) [Charts 2 to 3].

It was good on: Fighting terrorism (+49), Developing a healthy economy (+48), Protecting the

freedom of the press (+47), Acting according to what the people want (+44), Fighting crimes that victimize

ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical violence, etc. (+43), Reconciliation with

Muslim rebels (+40), Foreign relations (+39), Reconciliation with communist rebels (+38), Eradicating

http://www.sws.org.ph/


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


graft and corruption in government (+32), Recovering ill-gotten wealth of former Pres. Marcos and his

cronies (+30), and Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea (+30) [Charts 4 to 14].

It was moderate on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat (+28)

[Chart 15].

It was neutral on Fighting inflation (+5) [Chart 16].

The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a

single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects. The general

rating is repeated every quarter, whereas only a core of the specific subject-ratings are repeated. Subjects

are included or excluded depending on their contemporary salience.

“Excellent” in Metro Manila, the Visayas and Mindanao, “Very Good” in Balance Luzon

The 6-point decrease in the National Administration’s overall net satisfaction rating was due to

declines of 10 points in Mindanao, 10 points in Balance Luzon, and 1 point in the Visayas, combined with

a 12-point increase in Metro Manila.

It fell from excellent to very good in Balance Luzon, down by 10 points from +73 in June 2019 to

+63 in September 2019 [Chart 17; Table 4].

It stayed excellent in Mindanao, although down by 10 points from +80 in June to +70 in September.

It also stayed excellent in the Visayas, down by 1 point from +71 in June to +70 in September.

However, it rose from very good to excellent in Metro Manila, up by 12 points from +59 in June

to +71 in September.

“Very Good” in both urban and rural areas

Rural net satisfaction with the National Administration fell from excellent to very good , down by

7 points from +74 in June to +67 in September [Table 6].

Urban net satisfaction also fell from excellent to very good, down by 4 points from +71 in June to

+67 in September.

“Excellent” in class ABC; “Very Good” in classes D and E

Net satisfaction with the National Administration fell from excellent to very good in class D, or

the masa, down by 7 points from +73 in June 2019 to +66 in September 2019 [Chart 18; Tables 5 and 6].

It also declined from excellent to very good in class E, down by 5 points from +73 in June to +68

in September.

However, it rose from very good to excellent in class ABC, up by 18 points from +60 in June to

+78 in September.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


By sex, it stayed at very good +69 among men from June to September.

However, it fell from excellent to very good among women, down by 9 points from +76 in June to

+65 in September.

By age group, it fell from excellent to very good among the 18-24 year olds, down by 10 points

from +70 in June to +60 in September, the 25-34 year olds, down by 8 points from +73 to +65, the 35-44

year olds, down by 13 points from +82 to +69, and the 45-54 year olds, down by 2 points from +71 to

+69.

It stayed very good among the 55 year olds and above, up by 2 points from +67 in June to +69 in

September.

By educational level, net satisfaction with the National Administration fell from excellent to very

good among elementary graduates, down by 8 points from +72 in June to +64 in June.

It stayed excellent among high school graduates, although down by 8 points from +79 in June to

+71 in September.

It stayed very good among non-elementary graduates, up by 2 points from +61 in June to +63 in

September.

It also stayed very good among college graduates, unchanged at +65 from June to September.

National Administration’s net rating declines on 7 subjects, improves on 3, steady on 5

The September 2019 survey found the National Administration’s net satisfaction rating down by

one grade on 7 specific subjects, up by one grade on 3 subjects, and steady on 5 subjects, compared to

when they were last surveyed.

The National Administration’s net rating rose from good to very good on Having clear policies,

up 13 points from +40 in June 2018 to +53 in September 2019.

However, it fell from excellent to very good on Helping the poor, down by 8 points from +70 in

June 2019 to +62 in September 2019.

It rose from moderate to good on 2 specific subjects: Developing a healthy economy, up by 21

points from +27 in September 1998 to +48 in September 2019, and Acting according to what the people

want, up by 21 points from +23 in March 2011 to +44 in September 2019.

It stayed good on 5 specific subjects: Reconciling with Muslim rebels, although down by 6 points

from +46 in June 2019 to +40 in September 2019, Reconciling with communist rebels, down by 5 points

from +43 to +38, Eradicating graft and corruption, down by 7 points from +39 to +32, Recovering ill-


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


gotten wealth of former Pres. Marcos and his cronies, down by 11 points from +41 to +30, and Defending

Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea, down by 4 points from +34 to +30.

However, it fell from very good to good on 4 specific subjects: Fighting terrorism, down by 6

points from +55 in June 2019 to +49 in September 2019, Protecting the freedom of the press, down by 9

points from +56 to +47, Fighting crimes, down by 7 points from +50 to +43, and Foreign relations, down

by 13 points from +52 to +39.

It fell from good to moderate on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry, down by 6 points

from +34 in June 2019 to +28 in September 2019.

It fell from moderate to neutral on Fighting inflation, down by 9 points from +14 in June 2019 to

+5 in September 2019.

The subject on Providing information needed by the citizens to properly examine what the

government is doing was rated for the first time in September 2019.

Survey background

The September 2019 Social Weather Survey was conducted from September 27-30, 2019 using

face-to-face interviews of 1,800 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 600 each in Balance Luzon

and Mindanao, and 300 each in Metro Manila and the Visayas (sampling error margins of ±2.3% for

national percentages, ±4% each for Balance Luzon and Mindanao, and ±6% each for Metro Manila and

the Visayas).

The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population

projections for 2019 to obtain the national estimates.

The quarterly Social Weather Survey items on public satisfaction with the general performance of

the National Administration, and its performance on specific subjects, are non-commissioned. These items

are included on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service.

The survey question on public satisfaction with the overall performance of the national

administration is as follows: “Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa

kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? Kayo po ba ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO

NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, o

LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? [On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF

SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED?]”


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


For the specific subjects, the survey questions are as follows: “Gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi

nasisiyahan sa pamamalakad ng kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal tungkol sa (programs or

activities)? Masasabi ba ninyong kayo ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI

TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI

NASISIYAHAN? Pakisagot po ang mga ito sa pamamagitan ng paglalagay ng bawat kard sa naaangkop

na lugar sa rating board na ito. (SHUFFLE CARD) [How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration’s performance in (programs or activities)? Would you say that you are VERY

SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT

DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the

appropriate box on this rating board. (SHUFFLE CARD)]”

1. Paglalaban sa terorismo (Fighting terrorism)

2. Pakikipag-ugnayan sa mga rebeldeng Muslim upang ang mga ito ay magbalik-loob sa

pamahalaan (Reconciliation with Muslim rebels)

3. Pakikipag-ugnayan sa mga rebeldeng komunista upang ang mga ito ay magbalik-loob sa

pamahalaan (Reconciliation with communist rebels)

4. Pagtutulong sa mga mahihirap (Helping the poor)

5. Paglalaban sa pagtaas ng presyo (Fighting inflation)

6. Paniniguro na walang pamilyang kailanman ay magugutom at walang makain (Ensuring that

no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat)

7. Pagpapaunlad ng isang masiglang ekonomiya (Developing a healthy economy)

8. Pakikipag-ugnayan sa ibang bansa (Foreign relations)

9. Pagpupuksa ng katiwalian at pangungurakot sa gobyerno (Eradicating graft and corruption

in government)

10. Pagtatanggol sa kasarinlan ng Pilipinas sa West Philippine Sea (Defending Philippine

sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea)

11. Pagbabawi ng mga yamang kinurakot ng dating Pangulong Marcos at ng kanyang mga kroni

(Recovering ill-gotten wealth of former Pres. Marcos and his cronies)

12. Pangangalaga sa karapatan ng pamamahayag (Protecting the freedom of the press)

13. Pagkilos batay sa kagustuhan ng mga tao (Acting according to what the people want)

14. Pagkakaroon ng malinaw na patakaran (Having clear policies)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


15. Pagbibigay ng impormasyon na kailangan ng mga mamamayan para suriin ng mabuti ang

ginagawa ng gobyerno (Providing information needed by the citizens to properly examine

what the government is doing)

16. Paglalaban sa mga krimeng bumibiktima sa ordinaryong mamamayan tulad ng pagpatay,

holdap, pagnanakaw, pananakit na pisikal, atbp. (Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary

citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical violence, etc.)

SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and

analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Leo S. Laroza.

#


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 1

Table 1

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather ReportSeptember 27-30, 2019 National Survey

-+60

-+50

-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

-

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 – SEP 2019

+67

VG

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused responses. Q: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN

C. AQUINOFEB 89 +23SEP 89 +14APR 90 +17NOV 90 -10JUL 91 - 1NOV 91 + 1FEB 92 - 2APR 92 - 5

RAMOSSEP 92 +32DEC 92 +30APR 93 +24JUL 93 +31SEP 93 +14DEC 93 +24APR 94 +15AUG 94 +14NOV 94 +16DEC 94 +17MAR 95 +10JUN 95 + 6OCT 95 -18DEC 95 - 3APR 96 0JUN 96 +11

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE

OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINESRAMOS (cont.)

SEP 96 +10DEC 96 - 1APR 97 +28JUN 97 +31SEP 97 + 5DEC 97 +20FEB 98 + 8MAR 98 + 9

ESTRADASEP 98 +19NOV 98 +36MAR 99 +34JUN 99 +28OCT 99 + 2DEC 99 - 8MAR 00 + 6JUL 00 +24SEP 00 +10DEC 00 + 2

ARROYOMAR 01 +27JUL 01 +12SEP 01 + 8NOV 01 +27MAR 02 +12

ARROYO (cont.)MAY 02 0SEP 02 +15NOV 02 +13MAR 03 - 3JUN 03 +23SEP 03 - 6NOV 03 +3MAR 04 +14AUG 04 +15DEC 04 + 3MAR 05 - 6MAY 05 -13AUG 05 -11DEC 05 -15MAR 06 -15JUN 06 + 2SEP 06 - 3NOV 06 - 2FEB 07 - 3SEP 07 + 9DEC 07 -11MAR 08 -19JUN 08 -21SEP 08 -4DEC 08 -1FEB 09 -19

ARROYO (cont.)JUN 09 -11SEP 09 -20DEC 09 -22MAR 10 -45

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +64NOV 10 +64MAR 11 +46JUN 11 +45SEP 11 +56DEC 11 +56MAR 12 +46MAY 12 +44AUG 12 +62DEC 12 +57MAR 13 +53JUN 13 +66SEP 13 +56DEC 13 +51MAR 14 +45JUN 14 +29SEP 14 +35DEC 14 +34MAR 15 +19JUN 15 +31

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 15 +37DEC 15 +39APR 16 +35JUN 16 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +66DEC 16 +61MAR 17 +66JUN 17 +64SEP 17 +58DEC 17 +70MAR 18 +58JUN 18 +58SEP 18 +50DEC 18 +66MAR 19 +72JUN 19 +73SEP 19 +67


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 2

Table 3


Overall Performance Rating 77% 11% 10% +67

Helping the poor 75 12 13 +62

Providing information needed by the citizens

to properly examine what the government is doing 67 19 13 +54

Having clear policies 66 20 13 +53

Fighting terrorism 67 14 18 +49

Developing a healthy economy 64 19 16 +48

Protecting the freedom of the press 61 23 15 +47

Acting according to what the people want 59 25 15 +44

Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens 64 15 21 +43

Reconciliation with Muslim rebels 58 22 19 +40

Foreign relations 58 22 19 +39

Reconciliation with communist rebels 58 22 19 +38

Eradicating graft and corruption in government 57 17 25 +32

Recovering ill-gotten wealth of former Pres. Marcos

and his cronies 54 22 23 +30

Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West PH Sea 54 20 24 +30

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry 53 20 25 +28

Fighting inflation 43 17 39 +5

Very Good (3)


SAT UND DIS NET*

SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, SEP 2019

Very Good

Good(11)

Moderate (1)

Neutral (1)



SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2018 TO SEP 2019

Overall performance rating +66 +72 +73 +67

Helping the poor +68 +72 +70 +62

Providing information needed by the citizens

to properly examine what the government is doing +54

Having clear policies +40 [Jun18] +53

Fighting terrorism +55 +58 +55 +49

Developing a healthy economy +27 [Sep98] +48

Protecting the freedom of the press +56 +47

Acting according to what the people want +23 [Mar11] +44

Fighting crimes +44 +48 +50 +43

Reconciling with Muslim rebels +43 +44 +46 +40

Foreign relations +38 +41 +52 +39

Reconciling with communist rebels +39 +45 +43 +38

Eradicating graft and corruption +42 +41 +39 +32

Recovering ill-gotten wealth of former Pres. Marcos

and his cronies +41 +30

Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West PH Sea +40 +40 +34 +30

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +28 +37 +34 +28

Fighting inflation +14 +22 +14 +5

Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19

Very Good (3)

Very Good

Good(11)

Moderate (1)

Neutral (1)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 2

Chart 3


NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON HELPING THE POOR: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 – SEP 2019


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

VG

+62

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

+53

VG

NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON HAVING CLEAR POLICIES: PHILIPPINES, JUL 2000 – SEP 2019

ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 4

Chart 5


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON FIGHTING TERRORISM: PHILIPPINES, NOV 2002 – SEP 2019


+49

G

ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON DEVELOPING A HEALTHY ECONOMY:

PHILIPPINES, MAR 1996 – SEP 2019



+48

G


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 6

Chart 7


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON PROTECTING PRESS FREEDOM:

PHILIPPINES, JUN 2005 – SEP 2019


+47

G


Net*

Satisfaction



ON ACTING ACCORDING TO WHAT PEOPLE WANT:

PHILIPPINES, SEP 1998 – SEP 2019


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


G

+44

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 8

Chart 9



ON FIGHTING CRIMES: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 – SEP 2019


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

Net*

Satisfaction


+43

G


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON RECONCILING WITH MUSLIM REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – SEP 2019



+40

G

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 10

Chart 11


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1992 – SEP 2019


+39

G


Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON RECONCILING WITH COMMUNIST REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – SEP 2019



+38

G

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 12

Chart 13


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

ERADICATING GRAFT AND CORRUPTION: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – SEP 2019C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+32

G

Net*

Satisfaction



ON RECOVERING ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH OF FORMER PRES.

MARCOS AND HIS CRONIES: PHILIPPINES, MAR 1999 – SEP 2019


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


+30

G

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 14

Chart 15


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON DEFENDING PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE WEST

PHILIPPINE SEA: PHILIPPINES, MAR 2018 – SEP 2019

+30

G


DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

ENSURING THAT NO FAMILY WILL BE HUNGRY: PHILIPPINES,

DEC 2004 – SEP 2019



+28

M

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 16

Chart 17


-+60

-+50

-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

-


ON FIGHTING INFLATION: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1991 – SEP 2019



+5

N

Net*

Satisfaction


-+70-+60-+50-+40-+30-+20-+10

+0+10+20+30+40+50+60+70+80+90

+100

-

-

-

-


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 – SEP 2019


NCR +71

Bal. Luz +63Vis +70Min +70


Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 4


C. AQUINO

FEB 89 - 2 +22 +28 +37

SEP 89 + 7 + 2 +25 +31

APR 90 - 4 +24 +18 +15

NOV 90 -42 -12 + 3 + 3

JUL 91 -28 - 4 +14 + 5

NOV 91 -23 0 +13 + 4

FEB 92 -18 - 4 + 3 + 7

APR 92 -13 - 2 - 2 - 8

RAMOS

SEP 92 +35 +34 +23 +34

DEC 92 +12 +34 +31 +35

APR 93 + 5 +31 +18 +26

JUL 93 0 +34 +28 +46

SEP 93 0 +15 +16 +22

DEC 93 +15 +30 +12 +29

APR 94 +13 +19 + 4 +19

AUG 94 + 9 +15 +10 +16

NOV 94 + 4 +24 +10 +16

DEC 94 + 8 +19 +19 +14

MAR 95 -17 +19 - 2 +20

JUN 95 - 4 +14 - 5 + 9

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

RAMOS (cont.)

OCT 95 -22 -22 -18 - 9

DEC 95 -19 - 3 0 + 7

APR 96 -15 + 2 - 9 +13

JUN 96 - 9 +17 +13 +11

SEP 96 + 4 +16 +10 + 1

DEC 96 + 7 + 1 -12 + 3

APR 97 +31 +35 +15 +24

JUN 97 +23 +34 +30 +32

SEP 97 + 5 +16 -24 +11

DEC 97 +19 +24 + 5 +29

FEB 98 -5 + 2 + 6 +29

MAR 98 -2 + 8 - 2 +25

ESTRADA

SEP 98 +19 +22 +15 +17

NOV 98 +33 +41 +20 +42

MAR 99 +34 +38 +18 +40

JUN 99 +23 +35 +15 +30

OCT 99 + 9 + 4 -10 + 7

DEC 99 -14 - 9 -19 + 4

MAR 00 + 2 + 8 - 4 +16

JUL 00 +25 +30 - 3 +36

ESTRADA (cont.)

SEP 00 + 7 +12 - 1 +20

DEC 00 -14 0 -11 +31

ARROYO

MAR 01 +30 +25 +25 +30

JUL 01 +3 + 4 +18 +26

SEP 01 - 7 + 2 +19 +19

NOV 01 +7 +27 +32 +35

MAR 02 - 6 + 7 +29 +17

MAY 02 - 3 - 5 - 2 +16

SEP 02 - 3 +18 + 4 +28

NOV 02 -13 + 5 +23 +34

MAR 03 - 6 - 3 + 3 - 6

JUN 03 +23 +22 +35 +13

SEP 03 - 4 -11 + 2 - 6

NOV 03 -15 -7 +19 +18

MAR 04 - 6 +13 +27 +18

AUG 04 - 5 + 7 +39 +22

DEC 04 -11 -5 +17 +16

MAR 05 -22 -20 +25 + 5

MAY 05 -43 -23 -4 +17

AUG 05 -25 -10 +8 -18


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 1 of 2)

NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN



NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 2 of 2)

*Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

ARROYO (cont.)

DEC 05 -27 -11 -9 -21

MAR 06 -33 - 8 - 7 -24

JUN 06 -35 + 4 +19 + 6

SEP 06 +29 - 3 + 5 + 3

NOV 06 -10 - 2 + 5 - 1

FEB 07 -20 - 6 -2 +12

SEP 07 -10 + 8 +17 +16

DEC 07 -24 -9 -9 -10

MAR 08 -32 -20 -8 -17

JUN 08 -27 -16 -26 -23

SEP 08 -14 -5 -4 +4

DEC 08 -20 -1 +12 +1

FEB 09 -29 -16 -21 -18

JUN 09 -19 -12 -12 -2

SEP 09 -22 -21 -21 -15

DEC 09 -33 -18 -23 -20

MAR 10 -57 -45 -39 -44

B. AQUINO

SEP 10 +68 +66 +60 +61

NOV 10 +49 +69 +59 +67

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

B. AQUINO (cont.)

MAR 11 +50 +42 +51 +47

JUN 11 +48 +37 +47 +57

SEP 11 +44 +59 +51 +63

DEC 11 +64 +52 +58 +56

MAR 12 +46 +39 +49 +55

MAY 12 +41 +45 +29 +58

AUG 12 +56 +65 +64 +59

DEC 12 +47 +54 +66 +63

MAR 13 +43 +54 +45 +63

JUN 13 +53 +68 +76 +63

SEP 13 +45 +59 +60 +53

DEC 13 +30 +52 +51 +64

MAR 14 +37 +41 +45 +56

JUN 14 +16 +26 +41 +34

SEP 14 +36 +24 +45 +46

DEC 14 +21 +35 +31 +43

MAR 15 +21 +8 +34 +26

JUN 15 +18 +29 +43 +34

SEP 15 +24 +44 +34 +34

DEC 15 +36 +35 +52 +36

APR 16 +17 +30 +58 +33

B. AQUINO (cont.)

JUN 16 +32 +45 +62 +60

DUTERTE

SEP 16 +66 +60 +62 +81

DEC 16 +53 +56 +58 +78

MAR 17 +62 +60 +67 +79

JUN 17 +67 +63 +56 +72

SEP 17 +51 +52 +57 +74

DEC 17 +71 +67 +57 +87

MAR 18 +58 +50 +57 +72

JUN 18 +47 +54 +56 +76

SEP 18 +40 +48 +42 +67

DEC 18 +60 +65 +63 +75

MAR 19 +65 +68 +74 +81

JUN 19 +59 +73 +71 +80

SEP 19 +71 +63 +70 +70

NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 18

Table 5


-+60

-+50

-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

-


NATIONAL ADMIN., by ECONOMIC CLASS, FEB 1989 – SEP 2019


ABC: +78

D: +66E: +68


Net*

Satisfaction


C. AQUINO

FEB 89 +25 +17 +38

SEP 89 - 5 +14 +22

APR 90 +26 +16 +15

NOV 90 -47 - 7 + 1

JUL 91 -27 - 2 +10

NOV 91 -25 + 1 +10

FEB 92 -25 0 + 2

APR 92 -21 - 4 + 2

RAMOS

SEP 92 +26 +42 +36

DEC 92 +20 +29 +42

APR 93 +17 +22 +33

JUL 93 + 3 +33 +39

SEP 93 + 8 +11 +31

DEC 93 +23 +23 +26

APR 94 + 5 +16 +17

AUG 94 + 9 +13 +19

NOV 94 + 8 +17 +18

DEC 94 +10 +14 +28

MAR 95 - 5 +11 +13

ABC D E

RAMOS (cont.)

JUN 95 - 8 + 8 + 9

OCT 95 -14 -20 -14

DEC 95 -19 - 3 + 3

APR 96 -14 - 3 +17

JUN 96 + 4 +12 +10

SEP 96 + 8 + 5 +27

DEC 96 +16 - 5 + 6

APR 97 +33 +27 +27

JUN 97 +39 +31 +27

SEP 97 + 8 + 3 +14

DEC 97 +27 +20 +17

FEB 98 + 2 + 7 +18

MAR 98 + 3 + 9 +11

SEP 98 + 6 +18 +34

ESTRADA

NOV 98 +27 +37 +36

MAR 99 +27 +34 +38

JUN 99 +20 +29 +30

OCT 99 + 5 0 +10

DEC 99 - 9 -10 - 2

ABC D E

ESTRADA (cont.)

MAR 00 + 4 + 6 + 8

JUL 00 +18 +24 +28

SEP 00 - 5 +10 +20

DEC 00 -30 + 3 +13

ARROYO

MAR 01 +30 +25 +29

JUL 01 +16 +11 +12

SEP 01 0 + 7 +13

NOV 01 +14 +30 +16

MAR 02 +17 +15 + 1

MAY 02 - 4 -3 +11

SEP 02 + 7 +19 + 6

NOV 02 + 1 +17 + 7

MAR 03 -16 0 - 7

JUN 03 +40 +19 +27

SEP 03 + 5 - 7 - 8

NOV 03 -14 0 +16

MAR 04 +6 +15 +15

AUG 04 +22 +15 +14

DEC 04 + 1 - 3 +19

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 1 of 2)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 6



NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 2 of 2)

*Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

ARROYO (cont.)

MAR 05 -21 - 5 + 2

MAY 05 -15 -18 0

AUG 05 - 2 -11 -15

DEC 05 - 9 -17 -12

MAR 06 -37 -9 -24

JUN 06 - 1 + 4 - 3

SEP 06 - 9 - 1 - 6

NOV 06 +10 - 4 - 1

FEB 07 + 4 - 2 - 6

SEP 07 +20 +8 +9

DEC 07 -21 -9 -13

MAR 08 -18 -19 -19

JUN 08 -24 -19 -25

SEP 08 -14 -2 -5

DEC 08 0 +2 -7

FEB 09 -26 -20 -16

JUN 09 -12 -12 -7

SEP 09 -35 -21 -15

DEC 09 -34 -22 -17

MAR 10 -47 -47 -41

ABC D E

B. AQUINO

SEP 10 +65 +66 +57

NOV 10 +62 +64 +65

MAR 11 +19 +46 +50

JUN 11 +45 +48 +36

SEP 11 +62 +57 +52

DEC 11 +54 +57 +53

MAR 12 +38 +44 +52

MAY 12 +27 +44 +50

AUG 12 +69 +62 +60

DEC 12 +78 +54 +62

MAR 13 +68 +50 +60

JUN 13 +61 +65 +71

SEP 13 +62 +56 +54

DEC 13 +54 +51 +50

MAR 14 +32 +45 +48

JUN 14 +27 +27 +38

SEP 14 +47 +33 +38

DEC 14 +41 +32 +40

MAR 15 +19 +18 +24

JUN 15 +33 +29 +38

ABC D E

B. AQUINO (cont.)

SEP 15 +21 +38 +40

DEC 15 +23 +39 +44

APR 16 +17 +32 +46

JUN 16 +24 +51 +50

DUTERTE

SEP 16 +58 +68 +62

DEC 16 +55 +61 +62

MAR 17 +61 +66 +69

JUN 17 +55 +64 +68

SEP 17 +60 +60 +46

DEC 17 +62 +71 +66

MAR 18 +56 +58 +54

JUN 18 +81 +56 +62

SEP 18 +47 +50 + 49

DEC 18 +72 +65 +70

MAR 19 +73 +72 +68

JUN 19 +60 +73 +73

SEP 19 +78 +66 +68

ABC D E


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: DEC 2018 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Total PH 76% 81% 82% 77% 15% 10% 9% 11% 9% 9% 9% 10% +66 +72 +73 +67

NCR 73 77 74 78 13 11 11 12 13 12 15 7 +60 +65 +59 +71

Bal. Luzon 75 78 83 75 16 12 7 12 9 10 10 12 +65 +68 +73 +63

Visayas 73 82 78 79 17 9 15 10 10 8 7 9 +63 +74 +71 +70

Mindanao 81 88 87 79 12 6 6 12 7 7 6 9 +75 +81 +80 +70

Urban 79 82 81 77 10 7 9 12 11 11 9 9 +68 +71 +71 +67

Rural 74 81 82 78 18 11 8 11 8 8 9 11 +65 +72 +74 +67

ABC 81 80 75 82 10 14 10 13 9 7 15 4 +72 +73 +60 +78

D 75 81 82 77 15 9 8 11 10 9 9 11 +65 +72 +73 +66

E 79 79 80 77 12 10 12 11 9 11 8 9 +70 +68 +73 +68

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?


SWS MEDIA RELEASE



PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: DEC 2018 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2)Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 19

Sep 19

Total PH 76% 81% 82% 77% 15% 10% 9% 11% 9% 9% 9% 10% +66 +72 +73 +67

Men 77 82 80 78 15 9 8 11 8 9 11 9 +69 +73 +69 +69

Women 74 80 83 76 15 11 9 12 11 9 8 11 +64 +71 +76 +65

18-24 74 86 81 75 16 9 9 10 10 5 11 14 +64 +80 +70 +60

25-34 79 80 81 77 13 7 11 9 8 13 8 12 +71 +67 +73 +65

35-44 77 83 87 79 14 9 8 11 10 8 5 10 +67 +75 +82 +69

45-54 77 81 82 76 14 13 6 13 9 6 11 8 +68 +75 +71 +69

55 + 73 78 78 78 16 10 10 12 10 11 11 9 +63 +67 +67 +69

Some Elem 73 79 73 73 18 11 14 15 9 10 12 10 +64 +68 +61 +63

Some HS 77 82 82 75 13 9 8 13 10 9 10 11 +67 +73 +72 +64

Some Voc/Coll

75 80 86 81 15 10 7 9 10 10 7 9 +65 +71 +79 +71

Coll. Grad 80 84 76 76 13 9 12 12 6 7 11 11 +73 +77 +65 +65

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net satisfaction ... · 3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 6 November 2019, page 3 of 20 By sex, it stayed at very

Documents