Survey #2 in Industry Insights’ COVID-19 Series COVID-19 · COVID-19 IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROVIDED BY IMPACT Percent of Organizations that Perceive

COVID-19IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION SURVEYEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

P ROV I D E D BY

IMPACT

Percent of Organizations that Perceive Stay at Home and Social Distancing Measures are “Very Necessary”

About the COVID-19 Impact & Implementation Survey:

Results for the 2nd survey in the series are based on surveys collected between Tuesday, April 7, and Thursday, April 9. More than 240 ASCE members participated in the survey. Industry Insights is fielding these surveys to help its clients assess and track their members’ perceptions, impact, and action plans related to COVID-19. Links to an online questionnaire were distributed to members. A total of 247 respondents participated in the survey. Confidence intervals can change, depending on the aggregate’s sample size and the response variance, though the overall survey portion of this research has a standard error of +/- 6.0% at a 95% level of confidence. The survey sample includes manufacturers, and professional services organizations and university and academic institutions representing a diverse set of industries. The COVID-19 Impact & Implementation Survey was compiled, tabulated and analyzed by Industry Insights, Inc. (www.industryinsights.com), an independent research firm based in Columbus, OH. Survey Contact: Shawn Six,[email protected]

Candice: Please add a creative legend to show dark blue = April 8th and light blue = March 18th

`

Percent of Organizations that Perceive Stay at Home and Social Distancing measures are "Very Necessary"

Organizations Having an Employee with a Confirmed Case of Coronavirus

Percent of Organizations Experiencing a Direct Negative Financial Impact

0% 100%

89%

73%

70%

86%63%

80%72%

82%

65%

As of March 18th As of April 9th

14%

Reported anemployee has confirmed case of coronavirus

22%

Reported an employee has confirmed case of coronavirus

8833%%

7722%%

6644%%

8844%%

7700%%

5566%%

4444%%

4466%%

5566%%

Overall

Service Providers (to Individuals)

Service Providers (to Companies)

Manufacturers

University/AcademicNot surveyed on March 18th

Percent of Companies that perceive the Medical Implications of the Coronavirus to be a Moderate or Major Issue

Percent of Companies Reporting a Confirmed Coronavirus Case(s)

Percent of Companies Already Experiencing a Direct Negative Financial Impact

0% 100%

89%

73%

70%

86%63%

80%72%

82%

65%

March 18th April 9th

14%Reported aconfirmed case of coronavirus on March 18th

22%

Reported aconfirmed case of coronavirus on April 8th

63%

72%

84%

70%

56%

44%

0%

46%

56%

Overall



Manufacturers

University/Academic

Not surveyed on March 18th



Candice: Please add a creative legend to show dark blue = April 8th and light blue = March 18th

`

Percent of Organizations that Perceive Stay at Home and Social Distancing measures are "Very Necessary"



0% 100%

89%

73%

70%

86%63%

80%72%

82%

65%

As of March 18th As of April 9th

14%

Reported anemployee has confirmed case of coronavirus

22%

Reported an employee has confirmed case of coronavirus

8833%%

7722%%

6644%%

8844%%

7700%%

5566%%

4444%%

4466%%

5566%%

Overall



Manufacturers

University/AcademicNot surveyed on March 18th

As of March 18As of April 9

Survey #2 in Industry Insights’ COVID-19 Series

P ROV I D E D BY

COVID-19IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IMPACT

Level of Confidence Your Organization will Receive Benefits from the Federal Government Relief Packages Related to COVID-19

Impact:

The coronavirus is reaching the employees.

Whereas 14% of organizations had an

employee with COVID-19 as of March 18, the

rate has climbed to 22% in the past 3 weeks.

Despite the financial toll, most organizations’

leaders agree that the “stay at home” and

social distancing mandates are necessary

actions. No surprisingly due to the level of

Covid-19 cases and deaths, respondents on

the East coast expressed the most concern.

The impact on organizations engaged in

civil engineering is becoming more evident.

Fifteen percent have rescinded offers to

entry level employees or interns. Two-

thirds of the responding organizations

have experienced cancellation or delay of

contracts. One out of five are facing potential

contract penalties due to project delays.

Half of the respondents are reporting cash

flow challenges. Less than 20% expressed

confidence their organization will receive

benefits from federal government relief

packages related to Covid-19.


Percentage of Organizations Experiencing the Following Negative Impacts

Organizations that have Recinded Offers to Entry Level Employees or Interns

Companies Facing Potential Contract Penalties Due to Project Delays

Most Important Goal for Infrastructure Funding Included in a Stimulus Package

Put largest number of people back to work 44%

Invest in modernized infrastructure 17%

Address the backlog of projects 11%

Release more opportunities for small business engineering firms 10%

Replace lost revenue 7%

Improve resilience 7%

21% 79%79% 21%

15%75%

Please add to center of pie charts above

60%As of April 8

32%As of March 18

15%21% 79%79% 21%

15%75%


60%As of April 8

32%As of March 18

21%

33%67%

Cancellation or Delay of ContractsCash Flow Challenges Hiring Freezes

Absenteeism

Supply Chain

Shortages Layoffs Furloughs (unpaid)

No plan for 64% 52% 35% 28% 28% 16% 16%

Not at All Confident

Not Confident Neutral Confident

Extremely Confident

20% 8% 55% 13% 5%

Organizations with Formal Disaster Plans in Place by Staff Size

Scenarios in which Organizations Have a Formal Plan

6644%%

5522%%

3355%%2288%% 2288%%

1166%% 1166%%

64%Cancellation or

Delay ofContracts

52%Cash FlowChallenges

35%Hiring Freezes

28%Absenteeism

28%Supply Chain

Shortages

16%Layoffs

16%Furloughs(unpaid)

2200%% 88%%

5555%%

1133%%55%%

Not at All Confident Not Confident Neutral Confident Extremely Confident

33%67%


Absenteeism

Supply Chain


No plan for 64% 52% 35% 28% 28% 16% 16%



Extremely Confident

20% 8% 55% 13% 5%



6644%%

5522%%

3355%%2288%% 2288%%

1166%% 1166%%

64%Cancellation or

Delay ofContracts


35%Hiring Freezes

28%Absenteeism

28%Supply Chain

Shortages

16%Layoffs


2200%% 88%%

5555%%

1133%%55%%


33%67%


Absenteeism

Supply Chain


No plan for 64% 52% 35% 28% 28% 16% 16%



Extremely Confident

20% 8% 55% 13% 5%



6644%%

5522%%

3355%%2288%% 2288%%

1166%% 1166%%

64%Cancellation or

Delay ofContracts


35%Hiring Freezes

28%Absenteeism

28%Supply Chain

Shortages

16%Layoffs


2200%% 88%%

5555%%

1133%%55%%


Expected level of Impact in 2020 on OrganizationCall out Labels

Revenue Revenu Numbe Adverti Technology SpendRevenue Very Negative Imp 21% 43% 10% 25% 16%Somewhat Negative l ight orange bar Somewhat Negati 68% 49% 40% 31% 27%

No Impact 7% 3% 47% 38% Somewhat Pos i tiv 3% 4% 3% 6% 34%

Number of Employees Very Pos i tive Impa 0% 1% 0% 1% 21%Moderate Reduction l ight orange bar Number of Employees 2%

Major Staff Reduc 3% Moderate Staff Re 31%

Advertising Spending No Impact 63%Moderate Reduction l ight orange bar Moderate Staff In 3%

Major Staff Increa 0% Advertising Spend Major Reductions 13%

Advertising Spending Moderate Reducti 20%No Impact Gray bar No Impact 63%

Moderate Increas 4% Major Increases 0% Technology Spend Major Reductions 8%

Extent of Long-Term Viability Concerns Due to the Coronavirus Moderate Reducti 19%

No Impact 31% Moderate Increas 39% Major Increases 3%

Legend notes

l ighter blue = As of March 18Darker blue = As of Apri l 8Orange = If No Governement Intervention Was in Place

Organizations that Experienced Coronavirus Related Delays in Receiving Materials/Products from Suppliers

30% 70%70% 30%

51%49%

act and Implementat T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N

To what extent do you have concerns about the long-term viability of your company, due to the coronavirus? Major 20% 16% 45% 13% 14% 37% 8% 8% 31% 6% 3% 29% 4% 3% 23% 5% 2% 12% 4.00 Mode 17% 29% 29% 22% 24% 24% 16% 23% 24% 19% 20% 28% 14% 14% 25% 10% 7% 12% 3.00 Mi ld 39% 40% 19% 41% 40% 28% 46% 43% 33% 38% 44% 27% 36% 44% 30% 28% 31% 31% 2.00 No co 24% 15% 8% 24% 22% 10% 30% 27% 13% 37% 33% 16% 46% 39% 21% 57% 59% 45% 1.00

0.78 0.62 1.79 0.51 0.57 1.50 0.32 0.31 1.24 0.24 0.12 1.15 0.16 0.13 0.92 0.21 0.10 0.48 0.52 0.87 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.73 0.48 0.68 0.72 0.56 0.60 0.85 0.41 0.43 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.78 0.81 0.38 0.81 0.80 0.56 0.93 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.89 0.54 0.72 0.87 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.30 0.27 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.16 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.59 0.45

3.00 3.00 21.00 8.00 11.00 37.00 2.02 2.12 2.73 1.94 1.94 2.70 1.76 1.82 2.50 1.64 1.53 1.91

100 to 499 500+


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99

No Concerns Major Concerns


No Concerns

As of March 18

As of April 8

Major Concerns

If No Government Intervention was in place

1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 499 500+

100%

0%

Companies by Number of Employees

Revenue

Number of Employees

Advertising Spending

Technology Spending

60%As of April 8

32%As of March 18

51% of organizations experienced coronavirusrelated supply chain delays as of April 8.












Legend notes



30% 70%70% 30%

51%49%



0.78 0.62 1.79 0.51 0.57 1.50 0.32 0.31 1.24 0.24 0.12 1.15 0.16 0.13 0.92 0.21 0.10 0.48 0.52 0.87 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.73 0.48 0.68 0.72 0.56 0.60 0.85 0.41 0.43 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.78 0.81 0.38 0.81 0.80 0.56 0.93 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.89 0.54 0.72 0.87 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.30 0.27 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.16 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.59 0.45

3.00 3.00 21.00 8.00 11.00 37.00 2.02 2.12 2.73 1.94 1.94 2.70 1.76 1.82 2.50 1.64 1.53 1.91

100 to 499 500+


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99



No Concerns

As of March 18

As of April 8

Major Concerns


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 499 500+

100%

0%


Revenue

Number of Employees


Technology Spending

60%As of April 8

32%As of March 18


P ROV I D E D BY


IMPACT

Extent of Long-Term Viability Concerns Due to the Coronavirus (Average)


Impact:

Ninety-percent of the organizations are

reporting a negative impact to revenue with

21% indicating a severe impact. One-third

have made a reduction in employees. The

typical organization has reduced its workforce

by 10%. In addition, one-third have reduced

spending on advertising and 27% have

reduced spending on technology.

Despite an overall deteriorating situation over

the last three weeks, organizations expressing

moderate to major concerns over their long-

term viability has dropped from 19% to 16%.

However, nearly twice as many expressed

moderate to major concerns for their long-

term viability if there was no government

intervention. In general, smaller organizations

expressed more concern than larger ones.

Expected Level of Impact on Organization in 2020

30%As of March 18












Legend notes



30% 70%70% 30%

51%49%



0.78 0.62 1.79 0.51 0.57 1.50 0.32 0.31 1.24 0.24 0.12 1.15 0.16 0.13 0.92 0.21 0.10 0.48 0.52 0.87 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.73 0.48 0.68 0.72 0.56 0.60 0.85 0.41 0.43 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.78 0.81 0.38 0.81 0.80 0.56 0.93 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.89 0.54 0.72 0.87 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.30 0.27 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.16 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.59 0.45

3.00 3.00 21.00 8.00 11.00 37.00 2.02 2.12 2.73 1.94 1.94 2.70 1.76 1.82 2.50 1.64 1.53 1.91

100 to 499 500+


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99



No Concerns

As of March 18

As of April 8

Major Concerns


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 499 500+

100%

0%


Revenue

Number of Employees


Technology Spending

60%As of April 8

32%As of March 18













Legend notes



30% 70%70% 30%

51%49%



0.78 0.62 1.79 0.51 0.57 1.50 0.32 0.31 1.24 0.24 0.12 1.15 0.16 0.13 0.92 0.21 0.10 0.48 0.52 0.87 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.73 0.48 0.68 0.72 0.56 0.60 0.85 0.41 0.43 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.78 0.81 0.38 0.81 0.80 0.56 0.93 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.89 0.54 0.72 0.87 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.30 0.27 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.16 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.59 0.45

3.00 3.00 21.00 8.00 11.00 37.00 2.02 2.12 2.73 1.94 1.94 2.70 1.76 1.82 2.50 1.64 1.53 1.91

100 to 499 500+


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99



No Concerns

As of March 18

As of April 8

Major Concerns


1 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 499 500+

100%

0%


Revenue

Number of Employees


Technology Spending

60%As of April 8

32%As of March 18


VeryNegative

NoImpact

ModerateReductions

NoImpact


Percentage Reporting Major Concerns on Long-Term

9.

51%As of April 9

MajorReductions

ModerateReductions

SomewhatNegative

NoImpact

ModerateReductionsMajor

ReductionsModerateIncreases

▪ No Concern▪ Mild Concern▪ Moderate Concern▪ Major Concern

Expected level of Impact in 2020 on Organization8-Apr

Revenue Very Negative Impa 21% Somewhat Negative 68% No Impact 7% Somewhat Positive I 3% Very Positive Impact 0% Number of Employees Major Staff Reductio 3% Moderate Staff Red 31% No Impact 63% Moderate Staff Incre 3% Major Staff Increase 0% Advertising Spend Major Reductions 13% Moderate Reduction 20% No Impact 63% Moderate Increases 4% Major Increases 0% Technology Spend Major Reductions 8%

Extent of Long-Term Viability Concerns Due to the Coronavirus (Average) Moderate Reduction 19%

No Impact 31%See Shawns file for legend details Moderate Increases 39%

Major Increases 3%

Percentage Reporting Major Concerns on Long-term Viability Due to Coronavirus by Size of OrganizationNo Int. 9-Apr 18-Mar

No Concern 29% 42% 49%Mild Concern 37% 42% 32%

Moderate 17% 12% 15%Major 17% 4% 4%

Legend notes

lighter blue = As of March 18Darker blue = As of April 9Darkest blue = If No Governement Intervention Was in Place 18-Mar 9-Apr No Int.

49% 42% 29%32% 42% 37%15% 12% 17%4% 4% 17%

act and Implementa T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N

To what extent do you have concerns about the long-term viability of your company, due to the coronavirus? Major 20% 16% 45% 13% 14% 37% 8% 8% 31% 6% 3% 29% 4% 3% 23% 5% 2% 12% 4.00 Moder 17% 29% 29% 22% 24% 24% 16% 23% 24% 19% 20% 28% 14% 14% 25% 10% 7% 12% 3.00 Mild co 39% 40% 19% 41% 40% 28% 46% 43% 33% 38% 44% 27% 36% 44% 30% 28% 31% 31% 2.00 No con 24% 15% 8% 24% 22% 10% 30% 27% 13% 37% 33% 16% 46% 39% 21% 57% 59% 45% 1.00

0.78 0.62 1.79 0.51 0.57 1.50 0.32 0.31 1.24 0.24 0.12 1.15 0.16 0.13 0.92 0.21 0.10 0.48 0.52 0.87 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.73 0.48 0.68 0.72 0.56 0.60 0.85 0.41 0.43 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.78 0.81 0.38 0.81 0.80 0.56 0.93 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.89 0.54 0.72 0.87 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.30 0.27 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.16 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.59 0.45

3% 3% 21% 8% 11% 37% 3% 4% 24% 3% 6% 20% 5% 2% 14% 4% 3% 9%

500+100 to 4991 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99

11 1 1 1 11 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 499 500+

100%


Revenue

Number of Employees


Technology Spending

29%

42%

49%

37%

42%

32%

17%

12%

15%

17%

4%

4%

As of March 18

As of April 9

If No Government Intervention was in Place

0%

Expected level of Impact in 2020 on Organization8-Apr

Revenue Very Negative Impa 21% Somewhat Negative 68% No Impact 7% Somewhat Positive I 3% Very Positive Impact 0% Number of Employees Major Staff Reductio 3% Moderate Staff Red 31% No Impact 63% Moderate Staff Incre 3% Major Staff Increase 0% Advertising Spend Major Reductions 13% Moderate Reduction 20% No Impact 63% Moderate Increases 4% Major Increases 0% Technology Spend Major Reductions 8%

Extent of Long-Term Viability Concerns Due to the Coronavirus (Average) Moderate Reduction 19%

No Impact 31%See Shawns file for legend details Moderate Increases 39%

Major Increases 3%

Percentage Reporting Major Concerns on Long-term Viability Due to Coronavirus by Size of OrganizationNo Int. 9-Apr 18-Mar

No Concern 29% 42% 49%Mild Concern 37% 42% 32%

Moderate 17% 12% 15%Major 17% 4% 4%

Legend notes

lighter blue = As of March 18Darker blue = As of April 9Darkest blue = If No Governement Intervention Was in Place 18-Mar 9-Apr No Int.

49% 42% 29%32% 42% 37%15% 12% 17%4% 4% 17%

act and Implementa T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N T1 T2 T2N

To what extent do you have concerns about the long-term viability of your company, due to the coronavirus? Major 20% 16% 45% 13% 14% 37% 8% 8% 31% 6% 3% 29% 4% 3% 23% 5% 2% 12% 4.00 Moder 17% 29% 29% 22% 24% 24% 16% 23% 24% 19% 20% 28% 14% 14% 25% 10% 7% 12% 3.00 Mild co 39% 40% 19% 41% 40% 28% 46% 43% 33% 38% 44% 27% 36% 44% 30% 28% 31% 31% 2.00 No con 24% 15% 8% 24% 22% 10% 30% 27% 13% 37% 33% 16% 46% 39% 21% 57% 59% 45% 1.00

0.78 0.62 1.79 0.51 0.57 1.50 0.32 0.31 1.24 0.24 0.12 1.15 0.16 0.13 0.92 0.21 0.10 0.48 0.52 0.87 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.73 0.48 0.68 0.72 0.56 0.60 0.85 0.41 0.43 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.78 0.81 0.38 0.81 0.80 0.56 0.93 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.89 0.54 0.72 0.87 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.30 0.27 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.16 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.59 0.45

3% 3% 21% 8% 11% 37% 3% 4% 24% 3% 6% 20% 5% 2% 14% 4% 3% 9%

500+100 to 4991 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99

11 1 1 1 11 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 499 500+

100%


Revenue

Number of Employees


Technology Spending

29%

42%

49%

37%

42%

32%

17%

12%

15%

17%

4%

4%

As of March 18

As of April 9

If No Government Intervention was in Place

0%

▪ As of March 18▪ As of April 9▪ If No Government Intervention was in Place

MajorReductions

ModerateIncreases

SomewhatPositive

ModerateIncreases

MajorIncreases

MajorIncreases

MajorIncreases

NoImpact Very

Positive

25%

50%

75%

P ROV I D E D BY


ACTION STEPSWhich of the following is a new action your organization has put in place due to COVID-19?


Canceled all large group activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81% . . . . . . . 89% Employee distancing (physical) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69% . . . . . . . 85%Canceled all in-person meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51% . . . . . . . 79% Eliminating visitors to office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41% . . . . . . . 69% Posted reminders about proper hygiene . . . . . . . . 55% . . . . . . . 62% Hand sanitizer (increased availability) . . . . . . . . . . 63% . . . . . . . 61%Work from home (partial mandate) . . . . . . . . . . . . 54% . . . . . . . 59% Travel ban (domestic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42% . . . . . . . 54% Travel ban (international) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48% . . . . . . . 51%Flexible work scheduling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60% . . . . . . . 51%

123456789

10

Top 10 Overall

Scenarios for Which Organizations Have a Formal Plan

March 18 April 9

Workforce Reductions

22%78%

1 to 4

Employees5 to 19

Employees20 to 49

Employees

50 to 99Employee

s

100 to 499

Employees

500+Employee

sNo plan for 23% 29% 31% 47% 44% 66%

Major employeeabsenteeism

Extendedsick pay

Prioritizingcustomers

Suspendingoperations

Identifyingalternative suppliers

25% 24% 17% 16% 9%




2233%%2299%% 3311%%

4477%% 4444%%

6666%%

1 to 4Employees

5 to 19Employees

20 to 49Employees

50 to 99Employees

100 to 499Employees

500+Employees

2255%% 2244%%1177%% 1166%%

99%%


Extendedsick pay




22% of organizations have furloughed/laid off/terminated employees since March 1, 2020

The typical organization has

reduced its workforce by 10%

22%78%

1 to 4

Employees5 to 19

Employees20 to 49

Employees

50 to 99Employee

s

100 to 499

Employees

500+Employee

sNo plan for 23% 29% 31% 47% 44% 66%


Extendedsick pay




25% 24% 17% 16% 9%




2233%%2299%% 3311%%

4477%% 4444%%

6666%%

1 to 4Employees

5 to 19Employees

20 to 49Employees

50 to 99Employees

100 to 499Employees

500+Employees

2255%% 2244%%1177%% 1166%%

99%%


Extendedsick pay







22%78%

1 to 4

Employees5 to 19

Employees20 to 49

Employees

50 to 99Employee

s

100 to 499

Employees

500+Employee

sNo plan for 23% 29% 31% 47% 44% 66%


Extendedsick pay




25% 24% 17% 16% 9%




2233%%2299%% 3311%%

4477%% 4444%%

6666%%

1 to 4Employees

5 to 19Employees

20 to 49Employees

50 to 99Employees

100 to 499Employees

500+Employees

2255%% 2244%%1177%% 1166%%

99%%


Extendedsick pay








Action Steps:

Since March 18, many more

organizations are now distancing their

employees and have canceled all in-

person meetings and group activities.

Most companies also now have at least

some employees working from home

and many are working flexible schedules.

The wide availability of hand sanitizer

and daily office cleanings remain very

common.

The current crisis has not pushed many

more companies to develop a disaster

recovery plan. Slightly less than half

(46%) of all organizations have a formal

plan in place for handling common

disaster scenarios. The largest companies

are the most prepared (65% have a

formal disaster plan), while just 23% of

the smallest companies have developed

a formal plan. Between March 18 and

April 9, more companies developed plans

to extend sick pay (24% vs 20%) and

major employee absenteeism (25% vs.

23%).

22%78%

1 to 4

Employees5 to 19

Employees20 to 49

Employees

50 to 99Employee

s

100 to 499

Employees

500+Employee

sNo plan for 23% 29% 31% 47% 44% 66%


Extendedsick pay




25% 24% 17% 16% 9%




2233%%2299%% 3311%%

4477%% 4444%%

6666%%

1 to 4Employees

5 to 19Employees

20 to 49Employees

50 to 99Employees

100 to 499Employees

500+Employees

2255%% 2244%%1177%% 1166%%

99%%


Extendedsick pay







22%47%31%

udec 32% 68%no 56% 44%

yes 11% 89%

The Future

Could you add a nice looking legend

When do you anticipate this will be over and your company’s day-to-day operations will return to pre-COVID-19 status?Never 3% 97% 8More than 27% 73% 71 to 2 year 27% 73% 67 to 12 mo 22% 78% 54 to 6 mon 10% 90% 42 to 3 mon 7% 93% 31 to 2 mon 1% 99% 2Less than 1 2% 98% 1

In-Office W Company T Participation in Large Group Activities (conferences, events, exhibits, etc.)Immediate 75% 49% 31%Return in 1 18% 33% 40%Return in 4 6% 18% 29%Never retu 1% 1% 0%

Expectations for a Return to Pre-COVID-19 Day-to-Day

Operations Status

Expectations of When Organizations will Return to Pre-COVID-19 Operations Status Once "Stay-at-Home" Orders/Directives are Lifted

Plans to Apply for a Loan through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) Program

This is a new section we may need to include on this page

Never

More than 2 years from now

1 to 2 years from now

7 to 12 months from now




Less than 1 month from now 2%

26%

28%

22%

11%

7%

1%

2%

YesPlan to apply for EIDL Loan

NoDo not plan to apply for EDIL Loan

UndecidedWhether to apply

11%

56%

32%

7755%%

4499%%

3311%%

1188%%

3333%%

4400%%

66%%

1188%%

2299%%

Organization Travel (domestic)

Participation in Large Group Activities (conferences, events, exhibits, etc.)

In-Office Workforce (most employees)

THE FUTURE

P ROV I D E D BY


ACTION STEPSPlans to Apply for a Loan through the Paycheck Protection Program

Expectations for a Return to Pre-COVID-19 Day-to-Day Operations Status


Expectations of When Organizations will Return to Pre-COVID-19 Operations Status Once “Stay-at-Home” Orders/Directives are Lifted

Plans to Hire Back Recently Furloughed/Laid Off Employees Once Loan is Disbursed

22%47%31%

udec 16% 84%no 49% 51%

yes 35% 65%





35%

49%

16%

YesNo

Undecided

Plans to Apply for a Loan Through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) Program

You can delete data labelsand add through indesign 8-Apr Inverse 8-Apr Inverse

undecided 16% 84% 35% 65%no 59% 41% 6% 94%

yes 35% 65% 59% 41%

udec 32% 68%no 56% 44%

yes 11% 89%

The Future

When do you anticipate this will be ov er and your company’s day-to-day operations will return to pre-COVID-19 status?Never 2% 98% 8More than 1% 99% 71 to 2 yea 7% 93% 67 to 12 mo 10% 90% 54 to 6 mon 22% 78% 42 to 3 mon 27% 73% 31 to 2 mon 27% 73% 2Less than 3% 97% 1

In-Office W Company Participation in Large Group Activities (conferences, events, exhibits, etc.)Immediat 75% 49% 31%Return in 18% 33% 40%Return in 6% 18% 29%Never ret 1% 1% 0%

Paycheck Protection Hire BackRadial Bar Source Data

Expectations for a Return to Pre-COVID-19 Day-to-Day Operations Status




Plans to Apply for a Loan through the Paycheck Protection Program

Plans to hire back recently furloughed/laid off Employees Once Loan is Disbursed

Never








27%

27%

22%

10%

7%

1%

2%

35%

49%

16%

YesPlan to

NoDo not plan to apply


YesPlan to hire

NoDo not plan to hire back

UndecidedWhether to hire back

59%

6%

35%




11%

56%

32%

7755%%

4499%%

3311%%

1188%%

3333%%

4400%%

66%%

1188%%

2299%%

Company Travel (domestic)



22%47%31%

udec 32% 68%no 56% 44%

yes 11% 89%

The Future

Could you add a nice looking legend

When do you anticipate this will be over and your company’s day-to-day operations will return to pre-COVID-19 status?Never 3% 97% 8More than 27% 73% 71 to 2 year 27% 73% 67 to 12 mo 22% 78% 54 to 6 mon 10% 90% 42 to 3 mon 7% 93% 31 to 2 mon 1% 99% 2Less than 1 2% 98% 1

In-Office W Company T Participation in Large Group Activities (conferences, events, exhibits, etc.)Immediate 75% 49% 31%Return in 1 18% 33% 40%Return in 4 6% 18% 29%Never retu 1% 1% 0%

Expectations for a Return to Pre-COVID-19 Day-to-Day

Operations Status




Never








26%

28%

22%

11%

7%

1%

2%




11%

56%

32%

7755%%

4499%%

3311%%

1188%%

3333%%

4400%%

66%%

1188%%

2299%%

Organization Travel (domestic)



YesNo

Undecided

Action Steps:

More than 1/3 of organizations plan to apply for a loan through the Paycheck Protection Program of the CARES Act, and 11% plan to apply for a loan through the EIDL Program. Most companies plan to rehire their recently furloughed/ laid off employees once their loans are received.

The Future:

The timeline has been pushed for when organizations expect the stay at home ban to be lifted and their daily operations will return to a pre-COVID-19 state. For the March 18 survey, respondents noted a general plan that things should return to normal by May 15. That envisioned date for normalcy is now targeted by most as sometime in mid-July.

The most positive findings from this survey are the expectations for how quickly organizations will return to their offices, traveling, and large group events and conferences. Three out of four companies plan to immediately return their workforce to the office once the ban is lifted (93% plan to return within 3 months). Company travel is expected to also quickly resume after the ban, with 82% reporting it will be resumed within 3 months. Though it may take longer for companies to adjust back to large group events and conferences, 31% reported they will immediately resume, and 71% said they will resume large group events within 3 months.

May

15July

10

Less than 1 month 1 to 3 months 4 months or more Never

(March 18) (April 9)

22%47%31%

udec 35% 65%no 6% 94%

yes 59% 41%





59%

6%

35%

YesNo

Undecided

Candice: Can you somehow round the edges (see image)

Please add nice looking legendlight blue = Last YearDark Blue = Current

I don't know if I like the directional arrows are just an idea. Do you have ideas to make this look nice?

Note: All charts and text are editable if you need to update colors

15%

15%

11%

19%

9%

4%

Percent of Respondents Region

3%

9%8%

Respondents by Company Type

Number of Employees

Respondents by Jurisdiction Classification

All Locations Deemed Essential

Non-Essential

Some Locations Deemed Essential

50%

32%

18%

Portion of Employees Working Remotely

60%

14%

12%

10%

5%

6%

2%

2%

58%

33%None

1% to 20%

21% to 50%

51% to 70%

More than 75%

P ROV I D E D BY


PROFILE

Respondents by Region

Respondents by Organization Type

Number of Employees

1 to 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%

50 to 99 . . . . . . . . . . . 7%

5 to 19 . . . . . . . . . . . 12%

100 to 499 . . . . . . . 21%

20 to 49 . . . . . . . . . . 12%

500 or More . . . . . . 36%

Manufacturer 3%

Service Provider to Organizations 52%

Service Provider to Individuals 16%

University/Academic 5%

Other 40%

About Industry Insights, Inc:

Industry Insights is a research and data analytics firm that has been serving the research needs of trade and professional associations, dealer organizations and other affiliated groups since 1980. The firm specializes in providing high-quality research services that assist such organizations in better fulfilling the informational and educational needs of their members.

As a group of CPAs, Statisticians, and IT professionals with decades of experience in providing survey research solutions for trade and professional associations, Industry Insights excels in defining methods and tools that provide relevant and user-friendly information for each client. Industry Insights serves as an objective third party and ensures the confidentiality of respondents’ data. Industry Insights welcomes questions about this survey. We may also be able to put you in touch with client contacts who could more specifically provide details and context regarding their members’ strategies.

Survey Contact: Shawn SixPrincipalIndustry Insights, Inc.6235 Emerald Parkway | Dublin, OH 43016614.389.2100 [email protected]





15%

15%

11%

19%

9%

4%


3%

9%8%


Number of Employees



Non-Essential


50%

32%

18%


60%

14%

12%

10%

5%

6%

2%

2%

58%

33%None

1% to 20%

21% to 50%

51% to 70%

More than 75%



28%

48%

10%

12%

54%

Last YearCurrent

All Locations Deemed EssentialNon-Essential






15%

15%

11%

19%

9%

4%


3%

9%8%


Number of Employees



Non-Essential


50%

32%

18%


60%

14%

12%

10%

5%

6%

2%

2%

58%

33%None

1% to 20%

21% to 50%

51% to 70%

More than 75%


51% to 75%

Survey #2 in Industry Insights’ COVID-19 Series COVID-19 · COVID-19 IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROVIDED BY IMPACT Percent of Organizations that Perceive

Documents