Heilbronn University Internationale Betriebswirtschaft - Interkulturelle Studien Internationale Betriebswirtschaft - Osteuropa IHRM Projects ADVANTAGE DIVERSITY – THE S-PLAN “Shebabco searches Spanish Specialists” submitted to Herr Prof. Dr. Dietmar Högel from Frederike Eder (171786) Jennifer Heinrich (171787) Anna Hoffmann (171547) Julia Kuhnigk (171836) Ramona Mozler (172172) Nha To (178129) Yara Yehia (180137) Summerterm 2012
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Heilbronn University
Internationale Betriebswirtschaft - Interkulturelle Studien
Internationale Betriebswirtschaft - Osteuropa
IHRM Projects
ADVANTAGE DIVERSITY – THE S-PLAN
“Shebabco searches Spanish Specialists”
submitted to
Herr Prof. Dr. Dietmar Högel
from
Frederike Eder (171786)
Jennifer Heinrich (171787)
Anna Hoffmann (171547)
Julia Kuhnigk (171836)
Ramona Mozler (172172)
Nha To (178129)
Yara Yehia (180137)
Summerterm 2012
Executive Summary
We, as HR professionals of Shebabco Company, are aware that global talent has
never been more mobile as today. Opportunities for workers have expanded with
globalization and barriers to their cross-border movement have fallen as countries
actively promote inflows to redress domestic skill shortages and to quicken
economic growth.
These factors have been decisive for our company to develop a new recruiting
strategy, as we are recently struggling to fill vacancies, both in the divisions of
management and production, with suitable talents from our domestic labor market.
Therefore, our strategy should not only assure the occupation of those vacancies,
but also lead the company to an advantageous position in the market. Nowadays, it
is inevitable to attract and persuade international talent, in order to
make good a deficiency in the field of skill shortage in the domestic labor market. In
order to establish this new recruiting strategy, we have developed the ―S-Plan‖,
standing for ―Shebabco searches Spanish Specialists‖. It is a persuasive strategy
and policy perfectly adjusted to Spanish talents. The plan describes the strategy
that Shebabco will use in the future, in order to attract Spanish specialists for long-
term employment in Shebabco‘s headquarter, located in Germany. As Spain
belongs to the crisis-ridden economies in Europe and is recently facing a
notoriously high unemployment rate, we are eager to use Spain‘s current
disadvantage to our full capacity, as we are aware of the positive contribution
skilled people can make to our company‘s development progress. In our new-
developed policy, we further make use of the probably most important success
factor of our company - its well established reputation. Not only Germany as host
country is said to be a centre for higher education and research, which helps
Shebabco Company to reach its aim of attracting the world‘s best and brightest, but
also the company‘s unique esteem of being ―employer of choice‖, offering its
employees different kinds of self-actualization. These facts obviously support and
facilitate our search for Spanish talent. However, a good reputation and a unique
esteem are not sufficient in order to attract talent from abroad. As described in the
following, we would like to achieve this goal through reaching the potential target
groups in the most effective way, including first and foremost young university
graduates, currently young unemployed and people with dependent families. In
order to successfully do so, we have chosen the most suitable recruiting and
communication channels for this challenge. Those include amongst others most
importantly the internet but as well as job centers, newspapers, head hunters and
the internal recruiting channel which is our Spanish subsidiary. Once we have
aroused their interest, we will make use of our persuasive assignment policy, which
offers the potential employees different kinds of incentives, both material and non-
material ones, and support in order to overcome all possible impediments, e. g.
intercultural trainings, language courses and other preparatory activities. Those
incentives have been established after submitting all impediments to a very careful
examination. In order to perfectly adjust them to each other we have divided them
into three main categories: Legal, personal as well as language and cultural
impediments.
We are highly convinced that our company will benefit from this strategy and will
successfully reach its goal of filling vacancies in the management as well as
production departments with Spanish specialists in order to profit from their
knowledge and skills.
I
Table of contents
Table of contents ....................................................................................................... I
Definition Sheet ....................................................................................................... III
1. Shebabco and its advantage strategy................................................................ 1
2. Advantage strategy of attracting talents from abroad ........................................ 2
2.1 Former practice ............................................................................................... 2
2.2 Target groups .................................................................................................. 3
2.2.1 Young graduates ...................................................................................... 3
2.2.2 Young unemployed people ....................................................................... 3
2.2.3 People with dependent families ................................................................ 4
10 Preparation of Presentation 9 22.05.12 19.06.12 29
11 Submission of Project Report 1,9 12.06.12 12.06.12 1
12 Final Presentation 1,1 19.06.12 19.06.12 1
27
28
6.8 Status Reports
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Status Report 1
Status Date Project Manager Sponsor
17.04.12 Nha To Mr. Taylor
Status Period from: 01.04.12
to: 17.04.12
Schedule performance All tasks are right on schedule
Issues requiring management attention
1. Team rules
2. Distribution of general tasks - Research
3. Decision who will be the project manager
4. Finding a project name
5. Work breakdown structure
6. SWOT analysis
Changes to scope, schedule, cost during this period
1. Meetings will take place on Tuesday during the course time
Major problems encountered and planned action to resolve
1. Project name not found yet – everyone should think of a name or it will develop itself during
the project
Major accomplishments in the past week
1. Everyone did research on his or her topic and did upload it in our dropbox folder
Major accomplishments scheduled for next week
1. Project work breakdown structure to be made on the four tasks ( a, b, c and d from the
assignment)
2. SWOT analysis to be done
3. Project name to be found
4. Follow Mr. Högel on Twitter
29
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Status Report 2
Status Date Project Manager Sponsor
02.05.12 Nha To Mr. Taylor
Status Period from: 18.04.12
to: 02.05.12
Schedule performance All tasks are right on schedule
Issues requiring management attention
1. Work Breakdown Structure
2. Gantt Chart
3. Stakeholder Matrix
4. Team Building Report
Changes to scope, schedule, cost during this period
1. Meetings will take place on Tuesday during the course time
Major problems encountered and planned action to resolve
1. Due to a mistake in our agenda not every team member took part in the last meeting on the
2nd May, but we cannot resolve this problem afterwards
2. We still have not found a project name and decided to choose one in the next meeting
3. We could not fully fill in the stakeholder matrix, because we do not know what ―need‖ exactly
means, we want to ask Mr. Taylor for advice
Major accomplishments in the past week
1. Work Breakdown Structure
2. Gantt Chart
3. Stakeholder Matrix
4. Team Building Report
5. Format of our paper
6. Development of our team rules
30
Major accomplishments scheduled for next week
1. Starting to work on our paper
2. Risk Log and Risk Profile Questions
3. Responsibility Matrix and Communication Plan
4. Project Definition
5. Assigned tasks
6. Collect questions for our next meeting with Mr. Taylor
31
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Status Report 3
Status Date Project Manager Sponsor
18.05.12 Nha To Mr. Taylor
Status Period from: 03.05.12
to: 15.05.12
Schedule performance All tasks are right on schedule
Issues requiring management attention
1. Distribution of work packages to team members
2. Risk log
3. Responsibility Matrix
4. Communication Plan
5. SMART Formula
6. Task Assignment
7. Project name
8. Working on our paper
9. Project Definition
10. Team Organigram
Changes to scope, schedule, cost during this period
1. As usual, the meeting will take place on Tuesday during the course time
Major problems encountered and planned action to resolve
1. Part ―Impediments‖ too general, we decided to rework it
2. Yara could not follow Mr. Högel on Twitter, because he is twittering in German, we decided
that Ramona will now follow him
Major accomplishments in the past week
1. Distribution of work packages
2. Risk log and Risk Profile Questions
32
3. Responsibility Matrix
4. Communication Plan
5. SMART Formula
6. Task Assignment
7. Project name
8. Working on our paper
9. Project definition
10. Team Organigramm
11. Development of our team rules
12. Working on the Gantt-Chart continuously
Major accomplishments scheduled for next week
1. Starting to work on our paper
2. Risk Log and Risk Profile Questions
3. Responsibility Matrix and Communication Plan
4. Project Definition
5. Assigned tasks
6. Collect questions for our next meeting with Mr. Taylor
33
6.8 Task Assignments
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Research Task assigned to Everyone
Assigned Date 04.04.2012
Task description Searching for information about the Spanish labour market, impediments, communication and recruiting channels, SWOT-Analysis, best practice examples and specific topics regarding the project
Completion criteria Consideration of all stakeholders and the information needed
Planned Start Date 04.04.2012
Planned Finish Date 13.04.2012
Predecessor tasks Hand-out of the assignment
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Tools Task assigned to Everyone
Assigned Date 17.04.2012
Task description Fill in all the tools that are needed for the project, like Stakeholder
Matrix, Project Proposal, Work Breakdown Structure, Status Report,
Task Assignments, Risk Log, Responsibility Matrix, Communication
Plan, Gantt Chart and Network Chart but include as well some
additional tools
Completion criteria Research must be done, strategy must be developed and the tasks for
every team member have to be defined, regular team meetings are
important
Planned Start Date 17.04.2012
Planned Finish Date 12.06.2012
Predecessor tasks Research must be done, development of a strategy, definition of tasks
34
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment –Team Building Report Task assigned to Julia Kuhnigk
Assigned Date 17.04.2012
Task description Create and fill in a tool for our team building and team progress Report
Completion criteria Our team building has to be documented and filled in continuously
Planned Start Date 17.04.2012
Planned Finish Date 12.06.2012
Predecessor tasks Forming teams for the IHRM Projects lecture
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Executive Summary Task assigned to Frederike Eder
Assigned Date 22.05.2012
Task description Write the executive summary for the first page of our paper,
summarizing all important aspects
Completion criteria Identify problems, methods, results and recommendations of our
concept for action and summarize it
Planned Start Date 27.05.2012
Planned Finish Date 01.06.2012
Predecessor tasks Having the Project Report finished
35
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Introduction Task assigned to Yara Yehia
Assigned Date 05.03.2012
Task description Writing an introduction for our project including some general
information to get started with the paper (Company overview, Labor
market overview, Aims of the project)
Completion criteria It should not exceed 300 word and it should cover the WBS clearly
Planned Start Date 05.04.2012
Planned Finish Date 05.06.2012
Predecessor tasks
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Best Practice Task assigned to Julia Kuhnigk
Assigned Date 15.05.2012
Task description Write part of our Project Report concerning best Practice / Benchmark
situation
Completion criteria Find relevant Best Practice examples which might be applicable to our
strategy
Planned Start Date 18.05.2012
Planned Finish Date 20.05.2012
Predecessor tasks Doing research on this topic
36
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Target Groups and Recruiting Channels Task assigned to Nha To
Assigned Date 02.05.2012
Task description Define target groups to attract in Spain and through which recruiting
channels we can reach them
Completion criteria Three target groups and at least three recruiting channels for each
group
Planned Start Date 03.05.2012
Planned Finish Date 07.05.2012
Predecessor tasks Doing research on the employment situation in Spain, take information
from previous research of recruiting channels
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Impediments Task assigned to Anna Hoffmann
Assigned Date 02.05.2012
Task description Analyze legal regulatory for EU citizens who aim to immigrate to
Germany due to labour purposes and their personal motives like family
challenges, cultural barriers and employment related impediments
preventing them from realizing their immigration plans
Completion criteria Find the relevant legal restraints for our project, look on Shebabco's
recruiting strategy from the perspective of Spanish employees and give
examples for their personal impediments
Planned Start Date 03.05.2012
Planned Finish Date 07.05.2012
Predecessor tasks Doing research on this topic
37
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Assignment Policy Task assigned to Frederike Eder, Jennifer Heinrich
Assigned Date 02.05.2012
Task description Describe the strategy how to attract the new employee and which
regulation and incentives/bonuses will be given to him/her
Completion criteria A strategy must be developed
Planned Start Date 02.05.2012
Planned Finish Date 12.06.2012
Predecessor tasks Doing research on this topic and developing a strategy
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Report:
Conclusion Task assigned to Julia Kuhnigk
Assigned Date 22.05.2012
Task description Write the conclusion for our paper, summarizing the most important
aspects of our paper and giving some future prospects how to finally
implement our strategy
Completion criteria Carefully revising all decisive factors that need to be considered in the
conclusion, as well as thinking about possible implementation
processes
Planned Start Date 27.05.2012
Planned Finish Date 01.06.2012
Predecessor tasks Having the Project Report finished
38
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Task Assignment – Presentation:
Establishment and Preparation Task assigned to Everyone
Assigned Date 05.06.2012
Task description Distribution of topics, preparation of presentation material, practice of
presentation
Completion criteria A real plan of the presentation topics and the progress of the
presentation have to be developed
Planned Start Date 05.06.2012
Planned Finish Date 18.06.2012
Predecessor tasks Having the Project Report finished
39
6.9 Action Plan
40
6.10 Risk Log
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Risk Log Project Manager: Nha To
Last updated: 15.05.2012
Risk
ID
Rank Date
Found
Assigned Description Strategy Status Close Out
Date
1 1 13.04.12 Everybody Paper is not completed on
time
Stimulate the work On track 12.06.12
2 2 04.04.12 Everybody Not everybody is participating
in the group work
Find a suitable time for
all
members/Encourage
everyone to participate
19.06.12
3 4 04.04.12 Everybody Somebody gets ill Organize the work
another way
19.06.12
4 3 08.05.12 Everybody Strategy is not suitable Consult with Mr.
Taylor, further research
15.05.12
5 5 13.04.12 Everybody Strategy is similar to our
competitors
Try to be unique in
every case
12.06.12
41
Risk
ID
Rank Date
Found
Assigned Description Strategy Status Close Out
Date
6 6 22.05.12 Everybody We can‘t find a suitable day
for everyone because of the
holiday
Try to do it the week
after, we could meet 2
times that week
05.06.12
Description of fields:
Risk Id: A unique identifier
WBS: WBS number of the task(s) related to this risk
Rank: How important is this risk relative to others? Rank with 1=highest. No risks have the same rank.
Date found: Date risk became known. mm/dd/yy
Assigned to: Person who is assigned to manage this risk
Description: High level description of risk event, impact and probability
Strategy: What will be done to reduce the probability, impact, or both?
Status: On-going log of changes to risk, in order from most recent to oldest. Format: mm/dd/yy – action/update
Close out date: When did the risk probability go to zero? Describe in the final status. Remove any rank from this risk.
42
6.10.1 Risk Profile Questions
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Risk Profile Questions Project Manager: Nha To
Last updated: 15.05.2012
Project Team
1. How many people are on the team?
7 persons
2. What percentage of the team is fully dedicated to the project?
About 70 %
3. Which team members will spend 20 percent or less of their time working on this project?
-
4. What is the experience level of the team?
One team member didn‘t have any HR experience before; the others have had HR
lectures or have done an internship in HR departments before.
The experience level of doing project management is low.
5. Have team members worked together before?
Yes, two team members have known each other before and have already
worked together.
6. Is the team spread out geographically?
For the duration of the project it is not.
Customer
1. Will the customer change current processes to use the product?
It is more about adaption than about change.
2. Will the project require the customer to reorganise?
It is an adaption. The company has to adapt its strategy.
3. Are the customers in different departments? Companies?
Defining our customer as being the company Shebabco, the customers are within
one company in the end.
Technology
1. Will there be technology that is new to the development team?
No.
2. Will there be technology that is new to the users or customer?
Adapting our strategy might result in using new technologies.
3. Is there any new or leading-edge technology in the project?
No.
43
4. Are the product requirements clearly documented and signed by all necessary
stakeholders?
Yes, it is. Our requirements are taken down in our assignment policy.
5. Are the product requirements stable?
Yes, but might be adapted during the project process and due to experiences
made.
Executive Support
1. Is there a known project sponsor who is actively involved in the project?
Mr. Taylor.
2. Is there sufficient recognition, support and involvement from all the senior management required for the success of the project?
We are supported by the senior management in terms of financial and legal
support and recognition, but they are not actively involved in the project work.
3. Is senior management setting deadlines or budget limitations independent of the project manager's schedule and budget estimations? If so, are these constraints realistic?
Mr. Taylor has set deadlines, the senior management is no contact person for us.
We did not receive any deadlines from them.
44
6.11 Responsibility Matrix
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Responsibility Matrix Project Manager: Nha To
This matrix describes the level of participation and authority for project stakeholders on major project activities.
E Execution responsibility. Stakeholder responsible for getting the work done. Not necessarily a decision maker, but drives the group to make
decisions in a timely manner.
A Approval authority. Final approval on accepting the outcome of this activity. Makes decisions.
C Must be consulted. As work is performed this stakeholder contributes information. Does not make decisions, but is asked for input prior to
decisions.
I Informed after a decision is made. Wants to stay updated on progress of this activity.
45
46
6.12 Communication Plan
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Communication Plan Project Manager: Nha To
This communication plan describes our strategy for keeping the project‘s stakeholders sufficiently informed to avoid any disappointment
regarding cost, schedule, or quality goals.
Stakeholder Information needs Frequency Medium Response
Project Manager Information about the project progress (results, costs, schedule, performance)
Information about problems and the planned actions
Weekly
Daily
Meetings
E-mail or Telephone
Required in the meeting
As soon as possible,
but two days latest
Project Team Information about the project progress (results, costs, schedule, performance)
Keep the stakeholders up to date
Information about problems and the planned actions
Information about changes in the schedule
Weekly
Weekly
Daily
Daily
Project team meetings
E-Mail
E-Mail or telephone
E-Mail
Required in the meeting
As soon as possible,
but two days latest
As soon as possible,
But two days latest
47
Stakeholder Information needs Frequency Medium Response
John Taylor Information about the project progress
Information about problems and planned actions
Final result of project work
Every two
weeks
Every two
weeks
Once
Meeting
E-Mail
Presentation
Required in the meeting
Management of
Shebabco
Final Result Once Presentation Required within one
week
Spanish Impats Final Result Once Presentation
Spanish subsidiary Information about project progress
Final Result
Every four
weeks
Once
E-Mail
Presentation via E-Mail
Required within one
week
HR division of
Shebabco in Germany
Information about project progress
Final Result
Every four
weeks
Once
E-Mail
Presentation
Required within one
week
48
6.13 Meeting Agendas
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 1
Meeting Date 15h30 – 16h30 Location
04.04.2012 Heilbronn University, cafeteria
Meeting Leader N/A
Meeting
Purpose
Kick-off meeting
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich x
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler x
Nha To
Yara Yehia
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Getting to know the project Everyone
Everyone will discuss about all the points in the hand-out assignment
2. Team rules Everyone
Establish team rules
3. Tools distribution Everyone
Discuss about all the needed tools as well as who will be responsible for which tools
4. A Platform for sharing information Everyone
Create a dropbox folder for the team to store and share necessary information
5. Project Manager Everyone
Choose a project manager for the team
49
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 2
Meeting Date 15h30 Location
13.04.2012 Room A510
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting
Purpose
Discussion of research outcome and make necessary changes in the
structure
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder x
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Gathering research information Everyone
Everyone will briefly present his/her research on topics that were assigned last time
2. Project name Everyone
Everyone will bring an idea for our project name
3. Draft structure Everyone
Define a draft structure for the project
50
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 3
Meeting Date 10h15 Location
17.04.2012 X309 and Mitterer Bakery
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting
Purpose
Discussion of research outcome and make necessary changes in the
structure
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Defining all unclear points Everyone
Define all the questions needed to ask Mr. Taylor in the consultation hours
2. Research Everyone
Do deeper research on the defined topics from last time
51
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 4
Meeting Date 10h30 Location
24.04.2012 Room A510
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting
Purpose
Discussion of research outcome and make necessary changes in the
structure
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk X
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia X
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Gathering research information Everyone
Everyone will summarize his/her finding according to the WBS defined last time
2. Project name Everyone
Choose a Project name based on everyone's proposal
3. Fixing project structure Everyone
52
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 5
Meeting Date 15h45 Location
02.05.2012 Room A510
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting
Purpose
Discussion about WBS, dividing our work into tasks and figure out
other tools
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder x
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To x
Yara Yehia x
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Work Breakdown Structure Frederike and
Jennifer
We can divide our work based on the WBS and start working on our paper.
2. Gantt chart Nha
We will fill in the Gantt chart to keep track of where we are, what we have done and what we
need to do as well as specific time of those issues.
3. Find out what does ―need‖ means in the tool stakeholder
matrix
Ramona
Complete the stakeholder matrix during the meeting to have a base for further tools.
4. Tools responsibility matrix and communication plan Everyone
We will start filling in these two tools next meeting together
5. Team Rules Julia
Add some more team rules to ours. See script of Mr. Högel, part 5, beginning on page 24
53
See Julia‘s proposals in the team rules document (written in green).
6. Tool – Risk log Everyone
We should discuss about the tool risk log, as we should do it continuously and haven‘t started
yet.
6. Project definition Everyone
Maybe we should think about setting our targets – see script part 2 page 21 (SMART-formula
for target definition)
54
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 6
Meeting Date 9h45 Location
08.05.2012 Room A510 or if occupied Foyer
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting
Purpose
Discussion about WBS, dividing our work into tasks and figure out
other tools
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Work Breakdown Structure Frederike and
Jennifer
We can divide our work based on the WBS and start working on our paper.
2. Gantt chart Nha
We will fill in the Gantt chart to keep track of where we are, what we have done and what we
need to do as well as specific time of those issues.
3. Tools ―Risk Log‖ and ―Risk Profile Questions‖ Everyone
Fill the tools in together
4. Tools responsibility matrix and communication plan Ramona,
Anna
Status report about filling in these tools
5. Team Rules Julia
Add some more team rules to ours. See script of Mr. Högel, part 5, beginning on page 24
55
See Julia‘s proposals in the team rules document (written in green).
6. Project definition Everyone
Maybe we should think about setting our targets – see script part 2 page 21 (SMART-formula
for target definition)
7. Assigned tasks Everyone
Report about how it is going. How do we proceed with the tool ―Task assignment‖? Does every
team member fill it in when receiving a task? Find a rule
8. Information: document in dropbox folder to collect
questions for team consultation with Mr. Taylor
Everyone
56
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 7
Meeting Date 10h15 Location
15.05.2012 X309 and X111
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting Purpose Discussion about WBS, dividing our work into tasks and figure out other
tools
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann x
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Consultation with Mr. Taylor Everyone
Figure out the necessary questions to ask Mr. Taylor
2. Discussion about written part of the paper Everyone
Everyone should read through the combined draft paper and has her opinion commented on it.
3. Discussion about the results of the meeting with Mr. Taylor Everyone
Define the next step of conducting the strategy
4. Risk Log Nha
Risk log will be filled in by Nha whenever a new risk comes up
5. Project Definition Julia
6. Task Assignment Everyone, Jennifer
7. Gantt Chart Nha
8. Team organigram Julia
57
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 8
Meeting Date 9h45 Location
22.05.2012 A510
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting Purpose Paper discussion, impediments and changes in the paper, do the other tools
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Paper discussion Everyone
Figure out all the changes in the draft paper, discuss about the impediments part of Anna
2. Tools Everyone
Start doing the other tools that we haven‘t talked about before
3. Presentation discussion Everyone
Collect the ideas of how we want to present the strategy. Dress code, logo
4. Risk Log Nha
Risk log will be filled in by Nha whenever a new risk comes up
5. Gantt Chart Nha
Fill in the important tasks
6. Discuss about the missing parts of the paper Everyone
What we will write in the missing parts, e. g. conclusion, proposal, executive summary
58
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Meeting Agenda 9
Meeting Date 9h45 Location
05.06.2012 A510
Meeting Leader Nha To
Meeting
Purpose
Discussion of the paper
Project Purpose Establish strategy in order to attract specialists from Spain
Participant Names Attended?
Frederike Eder
Jennifer Heinrich
Anna Hoffmann
Julia Kuhnigk
Ramona Mozler
Nha To
Yara Yehia x
Agenda Item
Who‘s
Responsible
Time Allotted
1. Paper discussion Everyone
We will discuss about the last steps of finishing our paper
2. Logo Nha
Nha will complete the logo
3. Put paper into formal form Nha
Nha will put the paper into the paper form that was uploaded by Julia before
4. Connecting parts Jennifer
Jennifer will write connecting parts and also the sentence for concept of actions after the
introduction
5. Conclusion, executive summary Frederike,
Julia
Frederike and Julia will complete the conclusion and the executive summary
59
6. References Everyone
Everyone should include the references of his/her parts in brackets right after their part. Nha
will put it into an formal form at the end of the page
7. Action plan Yara
Yara will finish the action plan and upload it to the tool folder in our dropbox folder
8. Closure report Ramona
9. Definition sheet Jennifer
Impat, assignment policy, short-term, long-term and also other terms
10. SWOT Analysis Anna
Anna will look over the SWOT Analysis and will adapt the format
11. Discussion of appendix Everyone
Think about whether we should add a country profile of Spain to the appendix, might be a good
idea
12. Presentation Everyone
Everyone should think of an idea (a unique one) for our presentation
60
6.14 Closure Report
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Closure Report Project Manager: Nha To
Sponsor: Mr. Taylor
Project Goal
The goal of the project is to define a sustainable strategy, in order to attract young Spanish
specialists for the Shebabco Company for long term employment.
Project Objectives
Major Objectives from Project Proposal
1. Research 3. Project Report
2. Tool Preparation 4. Presentation
Project Results
All objectives of the project were achieved and accomplished in the prescribed space of
time.
Major Obstacles Encountered
1. Not everybody was participating in the group work
2. Some group members were ill
3. Some group members didn‘t finish their work in time and with the required quality
Lessons Learned that are Relevant to Other Projects
1. Tools are of high importance (Agenda, Minutes, Responsibility Matrix…)
2. All group members should actively participate in the group
3. A schedule with deadlines is really important
4. You should adapt to the group members
5. Conflicts should be solved immediately
6. Mutual Respect
7. A high work input is important
8. A project should not be taken easily. You have to concentrate on your work
61
6.15 Team Rules
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Team Rules Project Manager: Nha To
Last updated: 15.05.2012
1. Arrive on time.
2. If you cannot come, notify in advance.
3. Avoid sharing project information with other teams.
4. Information within our team should be clearly communicated.
5. All conflicts should be solved. It is okay to ask questions and to ask for help if feeling ―stuck‖ or falling behind the schedule instead of
waiting for miracle.
6. In case discussion goes on for a long time, the decision of project manager should be accepted.
7. No cell phones during our meetings and no side conversations.
8. Project team members have the responsibility to notify any potential difficulties in meeting the schedule for any assigned tasks as soon
as it is known by the team member.
9. Participate in the meeting. Don't be a lurker - Even if you're not a talker, other team members may need reassurance that you are
following the discussion.
10. Be prepared to drop a topic - If a team gets stuck on a topic, it may be wise to delay discussion of it for another time.
11. Support the team concept and process.
62
6.16 Team Progress Report
Advantage Diversity – The S-Plan
Team Progress Report
Status Date Project Manager Sponsor
30.05.2012 Nha To Mr. Taylor
Stages of Team Development
1 Forming
2 Storming
3 Norming
4 Performing
5 Adjourning
1st phase: Forming
Our team first came together after having drawed the lots. These drawing lots ensured to build
diverse teams and to simulate a realistic challenge of forming a project team.
Against this background, most of us have not known each other before. We first sat together
and had a little introduction round. Each team member presented itself in some sentences, so
that we had the chance to learn all names and get a first impression of our new built team.
We then all decided to do the team role test at home, in order to identify individual working
styles. We discussed our personal results from these tests in our first kick-off meeting. It
helped us to agree on a project manager, as there have not been any trust relationships and
experiences so far.
In our kick-off meeting we tried to provide our team some ground structure by giving
background information, trying to reduce uncertainty. For example we have established team
expectations by setting up team rules, talking about meeting behaviors and we distributed
general tasks that will come up regularly. Amongst these taking the minutes on every meeting,
63
taking care of our dropbox folder (which we defined as our formal communication channel),
and a summary of last times issues at each beginning of a meeting etc.
In order to feel closer to the project, we started thinking about naming our team/project.
2nd phase: Storming
After having established the ground rules for our team and project work, we have had a coffee
together to get to know each other a bit more.
Our team started working, doing research on the topic and thinking about a structure.
There has been some confusion and uncertainties, but finally we engaged to build some trust
and reliability.
We could notice that we have had our first team decisions. For example to decide about the
question ―What problems we are really supposed to solve?‖
3rd phase: Norming
Following this and other concrete identified questions we agreed in the group how to operate to
go on and to reach our goal of the project. Ground rules have been accepted by everyone and
the working phase has started. The attitude to avoid conflicts in order not to harm the group
work‘s effectiveness has finally contributed to worthless results and dissatisfaction.
2nd phase: Storming
These reasons have unfortunately been conducive to repel the group to the storming phase.
As our project team is not homogeneous and there are a lot of different expectations, we
modified our ground rules again to reach identification and coherence within the group. One
big problem is that not everybody participates in the meeting, so that the team work takes
place between only some - remaining - team members.
This is a really tough phase of the project process as it is hard to overcome and might lead to a
failure of the project if we become stuck in this phase!
64
4th phase: Norming and Performing
Finally, our group formed - justified by the motivation of submitting a successful and good
graded project report in the end. Furthermore we have named our project. This led to more
identification with the project and to more effective and a bit more engaged team work and
team behavior within the group.
Rules are clearly distributed, team processes are improved and those team members
engaging a lot of time and enthusiasm in the project will lead the group to success in the
project – which is our main objective and on which we focus.
5th phase: Adjourning
As we approach our final closing dates – both for the report and the presentation – one can
perceive that the team members are preparing inner to let go the group and to close the
project. We will think about having some kind of common close ritual to mark the end of our 2-
month project work. Every person acting as a resource in the project is released and will then
move on and go his or her own ways again.
65
6.17 Team Building Report – Personal Diaries
6.17.1 Frederike Eder
At the beginning of the course IHRM projects/case studies, I was not quite sure what to
expect from it. After only a few lectures I got the idea and was already very excited
about my future team and of course about the task assignment. On the other hand, I
was not only skeptical as I have not had any experience in project work yet, but also as
I imagined group work with partially strangers as pretty hard and challenging. Due to
personal experiences with former group work, I know that it is not always easy to work
in big groups and that it can be very time-consuming and exhausting. So all in all, in the
beginning I saw the whole project as an interesting but also challenging task for me.
As I first got to know my other team members, I did not have a single clue about the
majority of the people I was supposed to be working with for the next few months. They
all seemed to be very friendly and I was sure we would get along with each other just
perfectly fine. After we have got to know each other a little better, we started our project
work with the kick-off meeting. We were all very excited and full of beans. However,
after only a few meetings it was absolutely obvious who was fully engaged to the
project, who really showed effort and who did not. Unfortunately, there were only about
60% of the team members who really showed dedication to the project. Other team
members did not even make the effort to participate actively just in one single meeting.
This was very frustrating and annoying but first and foremost a burden to the rest of the
team. Work that has been distributed to seven team members was actually done by
four. This hindered the whole project process as well as decelerated the progress of our
work, which was very frustrating to those team members who were fully engaged and
spent a lot of time and effort on the project. Moreover, only after a few meetings I got
the feeling that we have not chosen the right person as project manager. The person
seemed to lack of organizational skills, the communication was not as effective and
clear as I expected it to be and on top was the project manager not able to make
decisions for the whole team when we struggled with our work, deadlines etc. Certainly,
his attitude improved during the process of our teamwork a lot and in the end I was
quite content with his work and effort. However, I think it has cost us a lot of precious
66
time at the starting phase of our project, as we would have needed a person that take
the reins and drives and leads the team, especially through the first meetings.
I immediately had to think of the phrase: ―Some teams get stuck and never leave the
storming stage!‖. I think in comparison to some other teams, we had quite a hard way
through our project work, however, some of the motivated team members in our team
made a huge effort in order to reach our goal and not to fail. It was not always easy to
motivate some of the other team members and we rather pulled them through the
project.
However, not to sound too negative about the team work, it has to be said that we got
along fine with each other and we always behaved in a friendly manner towards other
group members. We never got to a point where we could not agree on one decision or
had a huge argument.
My personal lesson from the project work is that people have different goals. Some are
more ambitious than others. Some just want to pass the course and do not care about
the grade, others do. Some are ready to take on responsibility and work really hard,
others do not. Some people do not care about whether they are a burden to the team as
well as do not change anything about it. Certainly, I also experienced really good work
with other motivated team members. We worked close together and the communication
between us was great. The tie between us got stronger during the process of our project
and we could really rely on each other, which gave us the feeling of security and trust.
In conclusion, I believe that this whole course very much showed the reality of project
groups. They often consist of people who do not know each other and have not worked
together before, who also have a lot of other work to do besides the project itself but still
want to put the best they can into the project in order to make the possibly best out of it
–at least some of them. Overall, I enjoyed the task as well as the project work with all its
perils a lot. Personally, I learned a lot from it which might be useful for further project
and group work.
67
6.17.2 Jennifer Heinrich
I was really interested in the course ―IHRM project‖ because it is my aim for the future to
work in an HR department of a company. I thought that this course is a good possibility
to get to know how to work in such a project and what might be helpful when working in
such a big team. Therefore, I was looking forward to get to know what our project
assignment will be.
When we first met our new group mates all of us were a little shy because almost
nobody did know the other persons. Therefore, we made an introduction round that we
get to know the others better. Our group is a mixture of different cultures and we do
have two members that are in Germany for their semester abroad. All of the members
were very pleasant and I thought that the group work will make fun and will be
interesting but also challenging.
As we met the second time we discussed how we want to start our project and which
steps we will follow. We were informed by one of the students from abroad that she has
no HR-experiences but at that point all of us thought that this will not be a problem. We
also chose our project manager who was really enthusiastic at the beginning but in the
end I think he sometimes was not consequent enough. After the introduction round we
divided the research parts and opened a Dropbox folder so that all of us can see what
our group mates write and out of this have the possibility to discuss it in the next
meeting.
Very fast it was visible that the meetings were held by only a few people because the
other ones did not say anything or were not interested in participating. In my opinion
sometimes it was very hard because if you are a group of seven persons and only four
of them show their will that restrains the whole group. This had the effect that a lot of
our meetings were very exhausting. Out of this me and two other group members did
realize that we do not get forward. Therefore, we decided to meet after the regular
group meeting to recover the parts we did not finish in our meetings. A lot of times we
were sitting there for three more hours but we were successful.
68
One of the biggest problems was that we got the feeling that one group member was
not willing to help the group because the tasks have been delivered incomplete or not at
all. For me it was hard to understand why the person wants to participate in such an
HR- project of the highest semester but did not show any effort. In my opinion it would
not have been a problem if we, as the rest of the group, would have seen that the
person is motivated in learning something new and really wants to help us in reaching a
great strategy for our project. But unfortunately, this was not the case. The rest of the
group had to do the tasks of the person as well which took time and nerves.
The project showed that working in a group with people who have a different working
attitude and a totally different aim in fulfilling the project can be really hard and time
intensive. This was the first time that I worked with that many persons and with people I
never talked before. But I think in reality, project work sometimes might be like this and
therefore, I am thankful for this experience because right know I have a clue what I can
expect from future project work. All in all we have reached a great result and most of us
did a good job in fulfilling our project aim. Furthermore the communication between us
was very good and thinking about a good strategy really made fun.
69
6.17.3 Anna Hoffmann
At the beginning of our lecture ‗IHRM Project Management‘ in the summer term 2012 I
didn‘t know what to expect and was very curious about the content of our task. In the
first lectures Mr. Högel explained different issues of Project management and relevant
tools and documents. Honestly, I felt sometimes overwhelmed by the content and had
problems to understand the usefulness of project management and the procedures in it,
as I haven‘t had to handle with project work before. Therefore I read the script at home
once again and did some further research on the internet to get an overview of the topic
and the numerous tools. Some of the students hold presentations about psychological
tests and some tools in project management to give a better understanding. The
outcoming of the psychological test was that my personality type is the ‗cooperator‘,
which I found quite suitable. In the lectures, my first task was to prepare a presentation
about the tool ‗Task Assignment‘.
In the third lesson Mr. Högel announced that we will work on the project like in a real life
scenario. When I heard that the teams will be build up by drawing lots and that we will
be mixed up with the international students, I was concerned to get in a group with
people I might not get along with.
As I expected I had to join a team whose team members I didn‘t knew before. Our team
was composed of two international students, Nha and Yara, three IBIS students,
Frederike, Jennifer and Julia and two IBO students, who was Ramona and me. After the
lectures were finished we introduced ourselves and talked about meeting times. The
meeting calmed me as I realized that the team members seemed to be friendly, reliable
and motivated. Moreover, I was glad to have one male in our group, as in my study time
I experienced that working with girls might be difficult and stressful. Due to experience
in former group work, I know that it is sometimes problematic to work in big groups and
that it can be very time-consuming. So all in all, in the beginning I saw the whole project
as an interesting but also challenging task for me.
70
In our first session we clarified mainly organizational things. First of all, we decided that
we would meet every Tuesday morning and established our team rules.
We thought about the role and tasks of the project manager and agreed to share all
information, tools and documents via Dropbox. Then we made some brainstorming
about ideas and possibilities of our working procedures and distributed some general
tasks. Julia and Nha were responsible for the preparation of the tools and paperwork
each meeting, Yara‘s task was to summarize what we had discussed last meeting and
Frederike and me agreed to take the minutes by turns. We agreed that Nha should be
our Project manager.
Having discussed the procedures, we talked about the goal of our project and our
understanding of the task. Then, we split up the research in several parts and
distributed it equally among the team members.
In the second meeting we discussed the outcomings of our research. We developed the
idea that Shebabco could introduce a policy for international assignments to make our
German subsidiary more attractive for Spanish specialists. In the policy should be
included special programs, measures for assistance and incentives for the foreign
employees.
Further, we discussed which communication and recruiting channels should be included
in our concept of action. But we couldn‘t proceed as the question came up how the
concept for action should look like.
We hold our third meeting at the Mitterer Coffee Shop, which was a good opportunity to
get to know each other more closely, and discussed general ideas regarding our paper
contents. We agreed that our next step is to create the Work Breakdown Structure and
divided the main tasks amongst the team members.
In the following meetings we discussed and filled in the most important tools for our
project like the GANTT-chart, the Network-Chart and the Stakeholder-Matrix. We
decided to start writing our paper and divided it into several parts.
71
My part was to think about some impediments the impats and their families might face
when immigrating to Germany and to find solutions which could be offered by
Shebabco‘s personnel. Although I did much research on regulatory for immigration, I
had problems to define only the relevant impediments. In fact, I got stuck with the legal
impediments. From the lectures, I knew that there aren‘t any legal impediments for EU
citizens who come to Germany for work purposes, but in the internet I found so much
information about immigration restrictions in Germany, that I became quite confused
what information to include in our paper. At this point, I was really glad that I could rely
on my team. They suggested that I should only mention the principle ‗Free movement of
workers‘ as EU citizens aren‘t restricted by any laws when working in the EU. Besides,
they proposed to include further impediments like working conditions. I found the critics
quite helpful and was finally able to finish my part.
Conclusion:
Looking back I have learned much about project work, time management and
organization of tasks for my further study as well as for my professional life.
It took me getting used to work with people I haven‘t known before, but in the end it was
a valuable experience. However it was not easy to build up trust relationships, as
sometimes a few team members seemed to be demotivated or indifferent to the project.
It was really helpful to establish team expectations by setting up team rules and talking
about meeting behaviors. Finally we managed to build up trust and reliability and were
able to work more smoothly on our project. The discussions proceeded in a polite way,
while the team exchanged different point of views and tried to reach a common solution.
At the beginning of our project we were uncertain how to start, but in the end I was
surprised that we managed to succeed in such an extensive assignment by regularly
meetings and the distribution of tasks.
72
6.17.4 Julia Kuhnigk
When Mr. Högel announced that he will draw the lots to decide about group formation in
the IHRM Project, I have - at first - been really skeptical. It is obvious that it is easier to
do group work with people you already know – not only by character, but also by
working style, free time hours etc.
Our team primary came together and most of us have seen each other for the first time.
After the first few sentences and exchange of information, I have been tranquilized and
relieved and have looked forward to this promising, international group work.
Our first communication has not been that productive as there have not been any team
rules yet or any other standards to look about. We have managed that issue very fast
and I have been enthusiastic about our chosen project manager, as he seemed to be
the right person for the position and has taken up employment dedicated. Unfortunately
at each meeting I could feel that our group as a whole has not been homogeneous and
attitudes are a long way away from each other.
What affected and annoyed me the most has been the fact that some team members
did not do a good job. The work has finally been caught on the remaining persons. This
has been the reason for me to write an e-mail to all team members appealing to
everyone‘s commitment and attitude for the project. As we are seven persons in the
team, it is even more difficult to be flexible and so I asked them to set priorities for
themselves and for the importance of our project. I clearly told my team that I will do my
best to succeed in the project and that I expect everyone else to do the same.
Regrettably we have never really talked about that e-mail but as no one has
contradicted, I hoped to see their ―answers‖ in productive and dedicated performance.
However, it did not work out. During this time we have not been able to leave the
―storming‖-phase and go further to ―norming‖. At that time I was afraid that our project
might fail as our project team might break apart. Another possibility might have been to
leave the group and to set up an own group with those team members having the same
goals as me, being ambitious and working hard for a good grade in the end. As this
would have been the worst opportunity we made our decision against it.
73
Finally – to tell the truth – I decided not to spend my energy in worrying about the team
all the time, but I invested my vigor and willingness in the project work itself to bring it
further and to make it successful.
Even if the group work has not been the best this time, I learned a lot from it and in the
end I see it from that point of view that it simulated a more or less realistic work life
situation and challenge that might occur in my business life some day. So the
experience might help me to get along better in the future. If I could turn back time, I
would have been more consequent from the beginning, telling team members what my
expectations are and also telling the project manager what to do better in his function as
head of the team. I think this might have influenced the group in the right direction and
would have enabled effective and enjoying performance, at least in a less time-
consuming way.
Summing up, I can say that the project has been a really interesting but challenging
experience for me. The topic has been very attractive and sustainable. As it has been
my first project work I am looking forward to doing another one to profit from my learning
effects and to adopt my appropriate knowledge.
74
6.17.5 Ramona Mozler
At the beginning of the course IHRM-Projects I didn‘t know what to expect from it.
Before this course I had never done any things respective to management projects. So
all the things Mr. Högel presented to us during the lecture were new for me. I had never
heard anything about such tools like ―Responsibility Matrix‖ or ―Risk Log‖ and to be
honest I wasn‘t really interested in it, which changes during the project work.
When it comes to the point where the groups where draw by lots I wasn‘t very happy
about it. I only knew one girl from the course but for me it had been good to work at
least in a group with her. The lot ―decided‖ for me to be in a group with people I didn‘t
know and never worked before with. This was a strange feeling, because in the past I
had never worked with people I didn‘t know, so it was a challenge for me.
The first meeting of our group took place on the 4th April and I couldn‘t attend, because
of a really important appointment on this day. I think that wasn‘t really good for me,
because in the second meeting I had to get to know to everybody while there have
known each other from the last meeting. Thenceforth our meetings took place on
Tuesdays during the normal course time. To be honest I never felt as a real part of the
group and perhaps that‘s the reason why I never really intensively participated in our
meetings and when I sometimes said something my proposals where often not
accepted and I felt like the group was not taken me and my suggestions really seriously.
It was also a little bit difficult to get some ―work‖, because when a new task comes up
always the same people said ―I will do it…I will do it‖ but I tried to do as much as
possible and I liked to do it by myself. I worked with tools such as ―Responsibility Matrix‖
or ―Communication Plan‖ and I think that this ―tool work‖ helped me also in other project
works during my seventh semester.
I think that we never were a real team and that some members think that they are better
than other ones. Before this project work I was never in a situation like this. I always
participated in groups where all support each other and not blame each other. I think
that it is normal that somebody is talking more and somebody less. I also didn‘t like that
75
they not once talk plain text. They were always talking about some group members that
didn‘t participated well but they not once said about whom they talking.
To sum it up I think that we all did our best and that our project has a good result and
we will get a good grade. Some team members have done more work for it and some
less. But in the end we‘re all ONE team.
76
6.17.6 Nha To
Before taking the IHRM course, I had several small projects related to HR issues. Yet
they were mainly individual or small group work. I felt that I was inexperienced in terms
of working experience since I hadn‘t had any job before. Thus, I believed that from this
course I could really learn something through team work and through experience of
other HR students.
When it came to drawing lots to decide group members, I wasn‘t sure if it was a good
choice to do it that way. Yet, it was okay because when we work in real projects in our
future companies, chances are that we have to work with people we haven‘t known
before and they might be way different from us. However, I felt that a group with 7
members is a bit too much because it would be hard to find a suitable meeting time and
have a close-knit relationship between every group member.
At the very beginning of our project work, in order to avoid potential conflicts and to
work smoothly throughout the whole project, we decided to define the team rules which
every team member should follow. Basic rules were established and the rules can be
modified in the future when new issues come up. Moreover, I was appointed as the
temporary Project Manager. Actually this was the first time I was a Project Manager. I
didn‘t know if it was good for me and the team since I seemed to be one of the least
experienced people among the group. However, I perceived that I would gain more if I
took more challenges.
The several first meetings weren‘t productive as expected. I think because there were
different goals between team members because of the lack of communication since we
didn‘t know each other well beforehand. Before talking about the strategy we would
have to develop, we spent a lot of time discussing about the project tools because we
thought that Mr. Högel wanted us to focus on project tools rather than the strategy itself.
I was a bit confused at the beginning and wondered why we had to do a lot of tools but
not the strategy.
At some points of time, I felt that we were getting stuck in the storming phase and it
wasn‘t that easy to get over. A problem came up as we were doing our first research.
There was a risk that one member could leave the group since this was the first time
77
she participated in an HR project; she felt lost sometimes and she really needed the
help from all the team members. We tried to sit back together and assist her with her
work.
To be honest, I didn‘t put 100% effort to this project and there were a lot of mistake I
made during this project. We did have a conflict between team members in finding an
appropriate time for meeting and setting priorities for our project. A warning from one
team member made me realize that this was group work. And group work needed effort
from every team member. Although the warning wasn‘t discussed afterwards but I do
believe that it positively affected my effort and there were a positive change among the
team.
As the project rolled on, I felt that the time we defined the structure and everyone had to
write his or her own part was the time we got out of our storming phase. It was later
than expected but at the end, we could clearly see that we were progressing on the right
track. At the later stage of the project, I did enjoy our team work and I really felt that we
were doing what we needed to do to make every group meeting better than the previous
one.
To make the long story shorts, it is obvious that there are challenges at the beginning of
every work. We all need to be patient, devote effort and find a way to overcome.
Regarding my expectation at the beginning of the project, I have learnt something out of
this project. Regarding the project, project was challenging yet the interesting topic did
stimulate us to work hard on it.
78
6.17.7 Yara Yehia
As a finance student who has no knowledge in Human Resources and very few
knowledge in Management, I was really confused whether to take this course or not, but
luckily I chose to take the risk and involve in this amazing experience. In the first class
when my colleagues were introducing their selves, it was obvious that me and my
Egyptian friends are the only Finance students in the class and all other students are
having a lot of experience so I decided to learn a new thing which is totally unrelated to
my studies but defiantly it will help in my future and career. In the first lessons, when Mr.
Hoegel was explaining what International Human Resources Management is, it was
really hard for me to understand everything because there were lots of terminologies
that I‘ve never heard of, but I tried to search and understand whatever I found hard. But
the fear of the project was following me every lesson because I don‘t know anybody in
the class except the Egyptian students who are just like me in the HR and Management.
And when I knew that the group will be chosen randomly, I felt somehow safe but again
I was afraid to fail in working in a group, as I‘ve never worked in such a group before.
Surprisingly, I had a wonderful group, we are 2 international students; me and Nha and
5 Germans; Julia, Anna, Ramona, Jennifer and Frederike. All of them are really friendly,
helpful and supportive. Although we had some conflicts and some members were
dominating the project but still I learned a lot. To be honest, I‘m not one of those who
added something to the project but I was working very hard on the project but I really
tried to do my best in my parts but because I lack experience so I was consuming too
much time to get a small task done. I probably did a lot of effort in this project but it
unfortunately wasn‘t obvious in my work.
The first task I was assigned to make was to find the best practices and unfortunately I
couldn‘t, so I was really disappointed and I clearly emailed them that it‘s my first time to
work in a group and in such topic and I‘m not sure if I can do it or not but I want to learn,
and they were really nice to me and welcomed to help me if I faced any problem and
that what happened through our project. I learnt something new from every meeting and
every point I was assigned to make. But after that things were going smoothly and when
I face any problem I just ask someone to help me and they welcome and help, I‘m really
79
thankful for everyone who tried to help and for Mr. Hoegel because he gave me the
chance to involve in such an experience.
To sum it up, the project was really hard and challenging for me and I exerted a great
effort in it, learned a lot, had a really good experience and had a wonderful team
members. I hope the presentation won‘t be affected by the conflicts we had in the
group. And I‘m really thankful for all team members for giving me such experience and
helped me in this project.
80
6.18 Supplementary Material
6.18.1 Article „Spanische Fachkräfte gesucht”
Job-Migration Spanische Fachkräfte gesucht
Die Bremer abat AG leidet unter Personalmangel. Monatelang suchte sie vergeblich nach guten Bewerbern. Dann führte sie Vorstellungsgespräche in Madrid – und hatte Erfolg.
Von: Kristin Oeing
19.07.2011 – 16:04 Uhr
An der Puerta del Sol, im Herzen Madrids, packten die Demonstranten Mitte Juni ihre Zelte zusammen. Wochenlang hatten sie hier protestiert, für politische Reformen und gegen die Massenarbeitslosigkeit. Nur ein paar Hartgesottene blieben. Zur gleichen Zeit fanden einige Straßen weiter Vorstellungsgespräche statt. Eine deutsche Firma hatte acht spanische Bewerber eingeladen. Sie bot den Interessenten feste Verträge, soziale Sicherheiten, einen Lohn weit über dem derzeitigen spanischen Einstiegsgehalt – und einen Arbeitsplatz weit weg von der Heimat, im norddeutschen Bremen.
Für junge Spanier kann das ein attraktives Angebot sein. Die Arbeitslosigkeit der unter 25-Jährigen liegt in Spanien bei 44,4 Prozent, weit höher als in Deutschland. Bleiben sie zu Hause, werden sich ihre Aussichten in der Krise kurzfristig kaum verbessern. So hoffen nicht wenige Spanier auf einen gut bezahlten Job im europäischen Ausland. Deutschland hingegen will offene Arbeitsstellen in den nächsten Jahren vermehrt mit Fachkräften aus anderen europäischen Ländern besetzen. Bis zum Jahr 2025 könnten, laut Bundesagentur für Arbeit, durch eine gesteuerte Zuwanderung bis zu 800.000 Fachkräfte nach Deutschland kommen.
"Die berufliche Mobilität der Spanier wird zweifellos zunehmen", sagt Walther von Plettenberg, Geschäftsführer der Deutschen Handelskammer für Spanien (AHK) in Madrid. Bislang leben rund 80.000 Spanier in Deutschland. Darauf, dass noch mehr kommen mögen, hofft die Bremer abat AG, ein mittelständisches SAP-Beratungsunternehmen, spezialisiert auf die Branchen Automotive und Logistik.
Die Idee, spanische Bewerber zu rekrutieren, wurde aus der Not heraus geboren: Seit Monaten sucht das Unternehmen Fachkräfte. Weil diese so schwer zu finden sind, mussten schon Aufträge abgelehnt werden. Deshalb schlug abat-Berater Gonzalo Sierra Rodriguez seinem Arbeitgeber vor, sich doch einmal in Spanien umzuschauen. "Der Einfall kam mir spontan, kurz vor dem Beginn der Proteste", sagt er. "Ich kannte die Lage in meinem Heimatland und die meines Unternehmens. Die Lösung lag auf der Hand."
Der diplomierte Physiker und seine deutsche Freundin sahen schon vor fünf Jahren beruflich keine Chancen mehr im Norden Spaniens. Sie gingen nach Deutschland. Nach einem halbjährigen Sprachkurs und einem viermonatigen Praktikum stieg Sierra Rodriguez dann als Junior-Berater in dem Unternehmen ein. "Heute ist der Arbeitsmarkt in Spanien noch angespannter als damals", sagt der 32-Jährige. "Viele Hochschulabsolventen finden keinen Job oder erhalten nur schlecht bezahlte Jahresverträge. Aber wer will für weniger als 1.000 Euro im Monat arbeiten?"
Die abat AG, die derzeit rund 200 Mitarbeiter beschäftigt, will expandieren. "Wir suchen derzeit etwa zwanzig neue Mitarbeiter", sagt Hinrich Meisterknecht, Vorstand und Mitgründer des Unternehmens, "doch wir konkurrieren mit den großen Unternehmen in unserer Branche, und denen geben die Bewerber oft den Vorzug." So stieß die Idee des spanischen Kollegen im Vorstand auf offene Ohren. Die Verantwortlichen von abat inserierten im Internet, und sie kontaktierten die Universidad de Cantabria, im Norden Spaniens, die ehemalige Lernstätte von Sierra Rodriguez.
In den 25 Tagen darauf gingen knapp vierzig Bewerbungen bei dem Unternehmen ein. "Die Bereitschaft, ins Ausland zu gehen, scheint in Spanien durchaus hoch zu sein", sagt Meisterknecht. Margareta Hauschild, Direktorin des Goethe-Instituts in Madrid, kann das bestätigen. Die Zahl spanischer Schüler in den Sprachkursen ihres Instituts ist deutlich gestiegen. "Im Vergleich zum Kursbeginn im Februar 2010, konnten wir in diesem Jahr einen Anstieg von knapp 20 Prozent bei den Teilnehmerzahlen verbuchen", sagt sie. "85 Prozent unserer Kunden sind Studenten und junge Arbeitnehmer."
Gute Sprachkenntnisse waren auch für die Bewerbung bei der abat AG Grundvorausetzung. "Kenntnisse im Umgang mit unseren SAP-Programmen erwarten wir von den neuen Mitarbeitern aber nicht. Dafür müssen die Soft Skills stimmen", sagt Meisterknecht. Er rechnet damit, dass die Ausbildung der jungen Angestellten etwa sechs Monate dauern wird – Monate, in denen das Unternehmen von den neuen Arbeitskräften zunächst nicht profitiert. Meisterknecht sieht das pragmatisch. "Wenn du als Unternehmen nichts investierst, bekommst du auch nichts zurück", sagt er.
So flog er Mitte Juni nach Madrid, um zusammen mit dem Kollegen Sierra Rodriguez die aussichtsreichsten Bewerber kennenzulernen. Acht junge Akademiker wurden eingeladen, sechs erschienen. Drei von ihnen, zwei Entwickler und ein Berater, werden nun als Junior-Angestellte ins Unternehmen einsteigen.
Gonzalo Sierra Rodriguez ahnt, was auf seine neuen Kollegen zukommt. "Der Start in einem neuen Land ist nie leicht", sagt er. Er selbst brauchte ein knappes Jahr, um nach seiner Ankunft in Deutschland die feste Anstellung bei der abat AG zu ergattern. Seine neuen Kollegen hätten da einen klaren Vorteil, sagt er. "Sie haben eine feste Jobzusage und damit eine sichere Perspektive für ihre Zukunft." Um den neuen Kollegen den Einstieg zu erleichtern, werden ihnen Senior-Berater als Mentoren zur Seite stehen. Zudem gibt es eine Firmenwohnung, in der sie für eine Übergangszeit wohnen können.
Abat-Chef Meisterknecht will in Spanien nach weiteren Bewerbern suchen, diesmal aber nach Leuten mit Berufserfahrung. Die gleiche Idee haben derweil auch andere deutsche Unternehmen. Erst im Juni organisierte die AHK zusammen mit der Robert Bosch GmbH in Barcelona und Madrid Seminare zum Thema Berufsmobilität. Über 250 Ingenieure nahmen daran teil. Im Anschluss gab es Auswahlgespräche zwischen deutschen Unternehmen und den spanischen Ingenieuren.
Statistics show an increase in the number of German language learners in European states hit hardest by the economic crisis. The situation could prove beneficial to Germany suffering from a shortage of skilled labor.
New figures released by the Goethe Institute show a significant increase in the number of young people attending German language classes in southern Europe. In Spain, the number of students increased by 35 percent in the period 2010-2011, compared to 20 percent in Portugal and 14 percent in Italy.
Media outlets in Germany have reported what they describe as a wave of "German fever" spreading in those states hardest hit by the economic crisis.
"There is a real Germany fever in Spain right now," Zoraida Guijarro Cayuela, a Spanish journalist living in Germany, told Berlin's Tagesspiegel newspaper in an article published under the headline: "Welcome to Germany, welcome to unemployment benefits".
Guijarro Cayuela predicted that Germany was likely to be hit by a huge wave of immigration from Spain, where youth unemployment is up to almost 50 percent. Germany, on the other hand, is suffering from a skills shortage in the labor market. In December 2011 the Association of German Chambers of Industry and Commerce estimated that a total of 1.3 million jobs remained unable to be filled in Germany due to a lack of skilled workers. It is a situation which could prove to be mutually beneficial for both countries.
Spain's former Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero with Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel in 2011
Skills shortage
When she visited the then Spanish Premier José Luis Zapatero in Madrid in May last year, German Chancellor Angela Merkel spoke of 100,000 jobs for qualified engineers and talked of the shortage of skilled workers in Germany. While the figures she quoted were later retracted, the message was clear: "Germany needs you!"
Pablo Cavero Laman is one example of a skilled Spaniard finding work in Germany. The 26-year-old studied engineering in Berlin and after failing to find work in his native Spain, he managed to find a permanent job in Germany - something he described as akin to winning the lottery.
"In Spain, Germany is sold as some kind of paradise. People believe that the dream jobs fall from the sky. Some believe it is possible to apply for a job just like they do in Spain. But the work culture is totally different," he told the "Süddeutsche Zeitung".
Data released by the Federal Statistical Office late last year showed immigration from Spain had risen by 49 percent between 2010 and the first half of 2011. The number of Greek immigrants had risen by 84 percent.
83
Some 17,000 Spanish job seekers, a large number of whom are engineers, registered at the International Placement Services of the Federal Employment Agency in early 2011 with the hope of finding work in Germany.
Benefits withdrawn
As some newspaper headlines suggest, Germans are worried about a possible influx of immigrants into the unemployment benefit system. The number of Spanish jobless in Berlin rose by 60 percent between 2010 and 2011.
In concrete terms, the numbers remain relatively small. 567 Spanish citizens are registered as seeking work in Berlin, although those enrolled in German language courses or other training schemes are not included in the statistics.
In a move interpreted by critics as a pre-emptive measure to curb immigration from southern European countries, Germany last month stopped unemployment benefits for all non-German citizens unless they meet a specific set of requirements. These include having been resident in Germany for over five years, earning more than a marginal income or facing persecution or threat in their country of origin.
The German economy is suffering from a shortage of skilled workers, particularly in the field of engineering
Rejection of solidarity?
The decision to prevent foreigners from EU states from getting unemployment benefits was meant to prevent preferential treatment for those from the early wave of EU integration, including member states such as France, Great Britain, Greece and Spain.
But critics have condemned the move as a one-sided rejection of European solidarity on the part of the German government. There is also concern that the new regulations could discourage skilled workers from coming to Germany.
Christina Wendt, a spokesperson for the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, told DW that the controversy surrounding the changes was without foundation. She explained that EU citizens were never entitled to unemployment benefits in Germany until a legal case launched by a French citizen in 2009 determined it possible.
"That ruling was in effect for less than one year from 2010 to December 2011, during which time the number of foreigners applying for unemployment benefits actually sank. The new amendments affect a tiny percentage of people applying for unemployment benefits," said Wendt.
For now, fears of a wave of immigration placing a strain on the German welfare system remain unfounded. Berlin's mayor and Social Democrat Party member Klaus Wowereit has also dismissed the concerns.
"The majority of young people who want to come to Germany in light of the current situation, do not intend to live on the level of unemployment benefits," he told the Rheinische Post newspaper.
Eurokrise und die Folgen Junge Spanier fliehen vor der Arbeitslosigkeit
Autor: Carola Brand
Stand: 23.01.2012
Deutschland hat Konjunktur. Die Wirtschaft brummt und das macht unser Land zum Sehnsuchtsort für Zuwanderer aus dem krisengeschüttelten Südeuropa. Allein aus Spanien kamen im vergangenen Jahr über 20.000 Menschen in die Bundesrepublik. Sie fliehen vor der Arbeitslosigkeit, die in Spanien zuletzt auf knapp 25 Prozent gestiegen ist. Das ist der höchste Wert in der Europäischen Union. Noch düsterer ist die Situation der Jugendlichen. Jeder zweite Spanier unter 25 hat keinen Job.
Sehnsuchtsort Deutschland:: Junge Spanier fliehen vor der
Arbeitslosigkeit
Die Neu-Kollegen aus Südeuropa kommen hoch motiviert und oft bestens vorbereitet. Schon vor ihrer Ausreise schreiben sich Spanier zu tausenden beim Goethe-Institut ein, um Deutsch zu lernen. Das Kulturinstitut der Bundesrepublik verzeichnet an seinen fünf Standorten auf der iberischen Halbinsel die höchsten Zuwachsraten weltweit.
"Es sind vor allem junge Leute, die sich für unsere Kurse interessieren. Nicht, weil sie Goethe und Schiller im Original lesen möchten, sondern weil sie im Beruf weiterkommen wollen." Klaus-Dieter Lehmann, Präsident des Goethe-Instituts
Schuldenkrise Spanien herabgestuft
Und weil sie auf der Suche nach einer Zukunft sind, die ihnen in ihrem eigenen Land verbaut scheint. Wie schon im Mai 2011 gehen auch in diesen Wochen wieder Spanier auf die Straße, um gegen die Arbeitslosigkeit, die Politik der
etablierten Parteien und gegen die Macht der Banken zu demonstrieren. Den Protesten der empörten Jugend schließen sich mittlerweile auch Rentner an. Iaioflautas nennt sich eine Gruppe von Senioren, die um die Zukunft ihrer Enkel fürchtet. Mit gewaltlosen Aktionen in Ministerien oder in Bussen erobern die spanischen Omas und Opas die Sympathien der Öffentlichkeit.
Tapas gegen Heimweh
Doch während die einen noch protestieren, sind die anderen im deutschen Alltag angekommen. Sie finden Arbeit als Ingenieure oder in der Altenpflege, wundern sich über die vielen Regeln in Deutschland und freuen sich über den regelmäßigen Lohn, der oft doppelt so hoch ist wie im Heimatland. „Hier ist mein Studium mehr wert―, sagt Miguel, der seit fast einem Jahr als Ingenieur in Deutschland arbeitet. Der 26-jährige mag das Leben hier. Er kann sich vorstellen für immer zu bleiben. Und wenn ihn doch mal das Heimweh plagt, dann findet er in den Tapas Bars von München genügend Landsleute, die wie er sein Glück in der Fremde gesucht haben.
PESTEL-Analysis Spain: Extracts regarding the Economy5
Key findings
The current economic downslide began in 2007 following a housing market crash, and has worsened in 2009 ―The country's economic growth lost its momentum and began to decline in the second half of 2007. The Spanish economy‘s excessive dependence on real estate was exacerbated by the impact of global financial turbulence and the US sub-prime crisis, as the speculative price rises in the real estate market and the property boom came to an end. The economic crisis deepened following weak domestic demand and rising inflation. Spain‘s economic growth came down to reach 1.1% in 2008 and it contracted by 3.7% in 2009. Although the government recorded a budget surplus in 2007, the economic downturn has pushed it into a deficit during 2008 and 2009. The government has announced numerous packages with the intention of increasing liquidity in the system. In addition, the global financial crisis has made access to credit tighter, which is expected to slow down the process of economic recovery. However, unless these packages are implemented well it is feared that the recessionary affect will continue in 2010 (…).‖ ―The economy, after continuing to grow for 13 years at an average rate of around 4%, began to decline in 2007. The economy‘s weak foundation of growth was revealed when the real estate market, which was the major driver of the economy, crashed in 2007. It is feared that the recessionary conditions may continue in 2010, despite a number of government measures to stimulate it. Although the government undertook measures to revamp the regulatory system in order to further industrial activities and increase competition, it has failed to achieve the desired results and the state continues to intervene in economic matters. The deceleration will continue due to weak domestic demand. The Spanish economy may be even more damaged going forward as its social sector is dominated by the issue of an aging population and a shrinking labor force. The high levels of unemployment also continue to worry the government (…).‖ Economic analysis Overview The Spanish economy has been on a downturn since the later part of 2007, which follows a period of continued growth lasting 13 years. The economy, which was underdeveloped until the 1980s, was liberalized after Spain became a member of the EU in 1986. Subsequently, the government undertook a number of economic reform programs and initiated measures to improve fiscal discipline in order to meet the objectives set under the Maastricht Treaty. Spain‘s economy showed steady progress
during the 1990s, driven primarily by mass tourism and European subsidies. In fact, since the mid- 1990s, Spain outperformed the rest of the Eurozone, particularly the larger countries. The average economic growth between 1997 and 2000 was above 4%, but declined to 2.7%–3% during 2002–03. Although, the average economic growth increased to 3.54% during 2004–06, it came down to 0.4% during 2007–09. The economic growth lost its momentum and a decline began in the second half of 2007. In 2008, the country's economic growth declined to 1.1%. The speculative price rise in the real estate market and the property boom came to an end. The Spanish economy‘s excessive dependence on the real estate sector has been exacerbated by the impact of global financial turbulence and the US sub-prime crisis. The economic crisis deepened following weak domestic demand and rising inflation. However, since the second half of 2008 with declining prices, the country went into deflation (-3% in 2009). The government‘s budget also ran into a deficit in 2008 and 2009. Exports have also come under pressure because of deteriorating economic conditions in major markets. Analysis of Spain’s economy Current strengths EU membership The economy of Spain has become closely integrated with the EU. As a result, the government is committed to maintain fiscal and monetary stability, as required by the Maastricht Treaty. The government is on track with respect to product market liberalization. A limited degree of competition has been introduced with respect to energy, electricity, and telecommunications markets. The country also enjoys geographic advantages as it provides an easy gateway to both European and Latin American markets. These factors work in favor of improving the trade and investment climate in Spain. Furthermore, with Spain taking over the EU presidency has much higher influence over the economic prospects of the region. Strong FDI flows Despite the economic slowdown in the EU region, Spain continued to absorb foreign direct inflows into the country. The country‘s FDI increased from a level of $28 billion in 2001 to more than $65 billion in 2008. The Netherlands was responsible for 20% of FDI inflow into Spain in 2007–08. The UK and the US were responsible for 6.65% and 4.95% of investment, respectively, during the same year. Telecoms, real estate, hotels, manufacturing, and the agro-foods industry witnessed a large amount of FDI inflow. According to UNCTAD, Spain is the 7th most attractive country in the world for investment. Despite current recession in the country, it is expected that the country would still get considerable amount of FDIs.
95
Current challenges Economic recession The Spanish economy recorded steady growth for 13 years until 2006, but the rate of growth has declined since the second half of 2007. The decline started with the bursting of the housing bubble and the conditions worsened with the deteriorating US sub-prime crisis. The housing sector was one of the significant drivers of the Spanish economy, accounting for more than 9% of the country‘s GDP in 2007. During 2001–06 property prices doubled, with 60% of the increase coming during 2005–06 alone. However, since 2007 property prices have fallen and it is estimated that prices declined by a further 8% during 2008–09. The slump in the housing sector has spread to both manufacturing and services sectors, with business confidence survey results indicating a negative trend. Spain suffered the greatest drop in annual economic growth of all developed nations, with growth falling to 1.1% in 2008 and -3.7% in 2009. Furthermore, the GDP is expected to shrink by 0.8% in 2010. There are little chances of an early revival, as consumption and investment expenditure will remain poor and exports will also be undermined by the slump in international markets. High unemployment The Spanish government faces the major economic challenges of high unemployment and falling inflation since the end of 2008. An economic slowdown has led to a downturn in industrial activities and the level of unemployment has continued to rise. From a high of 20% in 1990, the unemployment level had fallen to 9% in 2006, but increased again to 18% in 2009– 10. By the end of 2009, nearly 4 million people were unemployed, resulting in a year-on-year increase in unemployment reaching 66.4%. The employment situation may further deteriorate, as estimates suggest that unemployment is expected to reach 19.3% by the end of 2010. Unless structural measures are undertaken to improve the labor market, there is a possibility of an increase in unemployment. Decrease in spending Due to economic recession and loss of jobs, the consumer spending has come down in the country. Furthermore, consumers are unable to maintain previous levels of spending, given that they can no longer finance as many purchases through loans. Lending to households fell by 0.7% year on year in the final quarter of 2009, the third consecutive quarter of decline, which was much lower than 3.8% growth seen in 2008. There has also been an increase in instances of domestic indebtedness and reduced spending, further aggravating the economic slump. Future prospects Austerity plan The Spanish government announced an austerity plan for 2011–13 and a revised Stability Programme to the European Commission for 2009–13, which projects a significant decline in the general government budget deficit and includes a "sustainable economy" program—first announced in November 2009—that aims to improve Spain's competitiveness over the next ten years. The stability plan acknowledges the rapid and
96
unsustainable deterioration in the government‘s fiscal position over the past two years, and sets out details of an exit strategy, beginning this year. The plan lays outs a framework to reduce the deficit by an average of 2.1 percentage points of GDP per year between 2010 and 2013—an effort that will be particularly challenging this year, when the risk of undermining a tentative and fragile economic recovery will be substantial. Moreover, the government's GDP forecasts look plainly optimistic given existing economic imbalances and the anticipated hit to domestic demand from higher taxes and lower spending. Liberalization of government dominated service sectors In line with the EU directives, sectors which have been government dominated are now being opened for private investment. The government has introduced measures to liberalize services sectors such as energy, telecommunications and transport. Despite privatization, private entities are finding it tough to compete with publicly owned organizations because of government policies. It is expected that with the introduction of competition policies, the services sectors will throw up more opportunities for investors. Future risks Labor market rigidities and unrealistic wage hikes The government‘s regulations have led to much rigidity in the labor market. Inflexible employment regulations have hindered overall productivity growth and employment opportunities. Moreover, the existing rigidities in hiring and firing a worker have made employers cautious in providing employment. According to Doing Business 2010 indicators of the World Bank, the country is ranked 157th out of 183 countries under the Employing Workers criteria, signifying a very strict labor regime. There have also been unrealistic wage hikes, which are unmatched by labor productivity. The decision to link wages to price index has imparted inflexibility to the labor market, as it is not related to improvements in productivity. It is likely to further deteriorate in the absence of significant measures to revamp the labor market. Prolonged recovery period following global financial crisis The Spanish economy has become closely integrated with the global economy. As a result, the turbulence in the global financial market has adversely affected the Spanish economy. The crisis has made access to credit tighter, which is a serious concern for an economy with excessive dependence on loans. Like many other European banks, large Spanish banks have found themselves embroiled in a crisis, which necessitated the central bank‘s intervention. In March 2009, the Bank of Spain took control of regional savings bank Caja Castilla La Mancha (CCM), replacing its directors with its own nominees and providing up to E9.0 billion in liquidity. Spanish banks have not been nationalized like banks in other European countries as strict regulations protected them from US high risk or "sub-prime" assets. Nevertheless, the number of non-performing loans has been increasing in Spain following a rapid rise in unemployment and the collapse of the property boom. In such a scenario, there will be a slowdown in lending, which will prolong the recovery process.