1 Haim Sperber Living in a new city: Jewish criminality in late 19 th century Odessa - myth and reality Introduction: Criminality and social deviance are some of the reactions of the transformation of societies from the traditional form to the modern form of society. During such transformations the old system loses its legitimacy and the ways of the new system have not as yet been embedded with the transforming society. This paper deals with the meeting of two new creations in the very end of the Eighteenth Century Russian Empire: the city of Odessa and Russian Jewry. The city of Odessa was created in 1798 and Jews were not allowed to live within the Russian Empire before the first division of Poland in 1772. Indeed Jewish society in Eastern Europe was re-shaped between the late Eighteenth and early Twentieth centuries. Those changes occurred due to external (namely living in new empires – Russia and Austro-Hungary) and internal (namely social, religious and ideological changes within the Jewish society). The first change was adjusting to life under new regimes, namely the Russian Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. As we shall see after occupying Polish territories where many Jews resided, Russian authorities decided to limit Jewish settlements to former Polish territories, not allowing then to enter old Russia, where they were not allowed to live since the fourteenth century. Russian authorities decided also to relocate the Jews within the ex-Polish territories. As a result of this Russian policy the Jewish population of the Russian Empire became an urban one. Enhanced mobility and Immigration - within the Southern Provinces of the Russian Empire as well as emigration to Western Europe and North America was during the Nineteenth Century, part of the day to day life for many Jews. This as well as the fact that, unlike their predecessors, Russian authorities have not allowed Jews (and other non-Russian groups within the Empire) the same autonomy they had under the Polish regime changed Jewish society, A second major change occurred simultaneously within Jewish society - a change which had nothing to do with the ruling powers in Eastern Europe. Since the late Eighteenth Century East European Jewry underwent significant changes. Jewish society was a homogeneous society
20
Embed
Living in a new city: Jewish criminality in late 19th century Odessa - myth and reality
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Haim Sperber
Living in a new city: Jewish criminality in late 19th century Odessa - myth
and reality
Introduction:
Criminality and social deviance are some of the reactions of the transformation of societies
from the traditional form to the modern form of society. During such transformations the old
system loses its legitimacy and the ways of the new system have not as yet been embedded
with the transforming society. This paper deals with the meeting of two new creations in the
very end of the Eighteenth Century Russian Empire: the city of Odessa and Russian Jewry. The
city of Odessa was created in 1798 and Jews were not allowed to live within the Russian Empire
before the first division of Poland in 1772.
Indeed Jewish society in Eastern Europe was re-shaped between the late Eighteenth and early
Twentieth centuries. Those changes occurred due to external (namely living in new empires –
Russia and Austro-Hungary) and internal (namely social, religious and ideological changes
within the Jewish society).
The first change was adjusting to life under new regimes, namely the Russian Empire and the
Austro-Hungarian Empire. As we shall see after occupying Polish territories where many Jews
resided, Russian authorities decided to limit Jewish settlements to former Polish territories, not
allowing then to enter old Russia, where they were not allowed to live since the fourteenth
century. Russian authorities decided also to relocate the Jews within the ex-Polish territories.
As a result of this Russian policy the Jewish population of the Russian Empire became an urban
one.
Enhanced mobility and Immigration - within the Southern Provinces of the Russian Empire as
well as emigration to Western Europe and North America was during the Nineteenth Century,
part of the day to day life for many Jews. This as well as the fact that, unlike their predecessors,
Russian authorities have not allowed Jews (and other non-Russian groups within the Empire)
the same autonomy they had under the Polish regime changed Jewish society,
A second major change occurred simultaneously within Jewish society - a change which had
nothing to do with the ruling powers in Eastern Europe. Since the late Eighteenth Century East
European Jewry underwent significant changes. Jewish society was a homogeneous society
2
with a unified Religious leadership, however since the late Eighteenth Century it became a
much more complex entity. New forces entered Jewish political, cultural and religious scene.
Many Jews ask for the secularization of Jewish society and termination of rabbinical rule of
the community.
Thus reactions to the challenges that faced Jewish society in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth
century created a new and much more complicated Jewish society. Criminal activity was one
of the reactions to this crisis. Since the late Nineteenth century Jews engaged in two main
criminal activities: immigration related crimes and white slavery (prostitution and trafficking).
The second became the main criminal activity Jews engaged in Odessa port and even became
the monopoly of Jews. This paper investigates why.
Georg Simmel’s theory on Metropolis and mental life can contribute to our understanding of
the phenomenon of new urban populations in new port cities (Simmel, 19711). In the new
environment (urban centres), claimed Simmel 'the deepest problems of modern life flow from
the attempt of the individual to maintain the independence and individuality of his existence
against the sovereign powers of society, against the weight of the historical heritage and the
external culture and technique of life. The antagonism represents the most modern form of the
conflict which primitive man must carry on with nature for his own bodily existence'. (Simmel,
1971, p.324).
Simmel emphasized that the Eighteenth Century caused the 'liberation from all the ties which
grew up historically in politics, in religion, in morality and in economics in order to permit the
original natural virtue of man, which is equal in everyone, to develop without inhibition' (Ibid);
the Nineteenth century on the other hand 'may have sought to promote, in addition to man's
freedom, his individuality (which is connected with the division of labor) and his achievements
which make him unique and indispensable but which at the same time make him so much the
more dependent on the complementary activity of others' (Ibid) - but, claimed Simmel, the
result of the changes in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth century brought about a major change.
A 'fundamental motive was at work, namely the resistance of the individual to being levelled,
swallowed up in the social-technological mechanism'. (Ibid).
Perhaps the old theory of Frontier offered many years ago by Frederick Jackson Turner may
prove fruitful here (Turner, 1921). Ports, I suggest, were the juncture where new populations
1 Thanks to my friend Dr. Nimrod Luz for this reference.
3
and new places met. In passing between countries and continents a new kind of people
appeared, people who found new solutions to new problems that were created by their new
environment. Over multiple generations, the frontier produced characteristics of informality,
violence, crudeness, democracy and initiative that allowed immigrants to leave behind the old
habits and embrace new one. This could happen either in border cities or in port cities. Port,
being temporary by nature provided a space allowing getting rid of the old and embracing the
new. When new populations met new cities (in our case new Jews meeting the new Odessa)
the juncture took some time a criminal turn.
The process described here can also be explained by adopting theories of marginality and
Marginal People (Goldberg, 2012). Marginalization can be describes as an individual cultural
adaptation style involve the rejection of both the values of the dominant "host" culture (Here
the Russian Empire) and the values of the culture of origin (Here the Jewish Community)
(Berry et. al. 2006). People experiencing such changes tend, sometimes, to transgress into the
criminal scene, especially in spaces like Port and Border cities.
Eldering & Knorth (1998, p. 153) claimed that: "Marginalization refers to a process by which
a person becomes distant from the conventional institutions in society (e.g., Family, School,
Labor market)". We claim that the process applies not only to youth but also to elderly people.
These persons (elders) run the risk of becoming delinquent when they migrate, physically and
culturally from a traditional to a new environment. This was, we suggest here, the case of New
Russian Jews encountering a new regime (Russian Empire after 1772) and new space (Odessa
since 1794). One of the aspects of this was criminal activity. This aspect will be discussed here.
Odessa and the Jews:
The city of Odessa was officially founded in 1794 as an Imperial Russian naval fortress on the
ruins of a former Ottoman fortress named Khadjibey (or Kotsyubiiv), (Herlihy, 1986). Near
the new military base an independent settlement of Moldavanka already existed. During the
19th century it was incorporated into the city of Odessa. Though established by Rumanians
Moldavanka became, since Mid-Nineteenth Century the Jewish quarter of Odessa.
4
Nineteenth Century East European Jews - A New form of Jewish Society
Jewish society in 19th Century Russian Empire was a new one in many respects - here are two
of them:
1. Before the breakdown of the Polish-Lithuanian Kingdom, also known as the first partition
of Poland in 1772 Jews were not allowed into Russia. Most East European Jewry lived within
the boundaries of the great Polish-Lithuanian Empire. Between 1772 and 1796 this political
entity disappeared. Poland was partitioned between the Russian Empire, the Austro-Hungarian
Empire and the German Kingdom of Prussia (Davies, 2005). Eventually in 1796 most of about
a million Polish Jews dwelled within the Russian Empire - an Empire that until 1772 forbade
Jews to live in its boundaries (Polonsky, 2009, Part 2, Chapter 5: The Jews in the Tsarist
Empire, 1772-1825).
Most of the Jews in the Russian Empire lived in the provinces of Ukraine and Lithuania, where
they have been living for many years before (Polonsky, 2005, Part 2, Chapters 3& 5). The
Russian Regime opted to leave the Jews in areas where they were living anyway. This was
because the new regime was unable to get rid of the Jews since they were crucial in operating
the Ukrainian Economy. Ukraine was called the granary of Eastern Europe. This was the very
reason the Russian decided to occupy Poland. Driving the Jews out of the Ukraine negated the
Russian Interest. Most of the Jews were thus forced to stay in what became to be known as the
“Pale of Settlement” (Deutsch, 2011). Only a few Jews - who were of importance to the
industrialization of Russia, were allowed to dwell in what was known as the “Old Russia”
(Klier, 1986).
However allowing the Jews to settle only in the "Pale of Settlement" was but one facet of
Russian policy towards the Jews. This represented a huge change in the relations between the
Jews and the Authorities. Under Polish rule Jews hardly were in touch with the authorities and
officials. The Jewish Community transferred taxes to the local administrators and in turn the
authorities allowed the Jews to run their community without any interference. The Russian
Empire operated in a different manner. According to the principles on Enlightened Absolutism
the Russian Czars tried to establish a modern state unified under the Rule of the Czar. An
attempt was made to "Russifiy" all religious and ethnic groups within the Empire. (Nathans,
2004 Stanislawski, 1983).
5
Russian rulers in the 19th century - especially Czar Nicolas (Nicolay) the 1st (in power 1825-
1855) promoted policies of Industrialization and Russification (Polunov,2005; Dolbilov, 2007)
that affected the multicultural population of the Russian empire, especially in the Ukraine2. As
part of this policy, Jews - along with others - were transferred into the large industrial centres
such as the Port city of Odessa. (Herlihy, 2003).
The Jewish population of the Russian Empire had to adjust to the new regime and its policies
(Nathans, 2004, Introduction). Jewish way of life under the new regime changed drastically.
Freeze and Harris show this in their collection of everyday lives of Jews in Russia (Freeze and
Harris, 2013). Some Jews reacted, as we shall see, to the new reality by adopting deviant and
criminal behaviours.
2. East European (now Russian) Jews were “new” in another sense. Since the 1760 new -
religious and secular - movements rose within East European Jewish Society. Two new groups
reshaped Jewish society in Eastern Europe: Hasidism and Enlightenment. Hasidism offered a
new version of Religious leadership emphasizing the role of the individual in religious
behaviour. Hasidism introduced a new kind of religious leadership and a new more ecstatic
daily religious behaviour. (Katz, 2000. Original Hebrew Edition, 1958 Original English
Edition 1961). Enlightenment and Secularism also became an important component of East
European Jewish Life, offering a non-religious version of Jews. Religious observance was
rejected by many Jews, who still lived within Jewish society. (Nathans, 2004).
Now for the first time since the Early Middle Ages Jewish society was no more a homogenic
religious society (Polonsky, 2009, Part 1, Chapter 2). Moving into the urban centres (Stampfer,
1995) together with the deterioration of authority of the religious leadership created
opportunities for groups hitherto in the margins of Jewish society. Furthermore, upon migrating
to large cities (including Odessa) the structure of occupations among Jews changed
significantly (Spitzer, 2012).
2 Though this policy was initiated by Catherine II (the Great) and Alexander I its main creator
was Czar Nicholas I. He decided to re-distribute the Jews within the “Pale of Settlement” and
during his reign Jews entered Odessa. See Polonsky, 2009, Part 2, Chapter 6; Stanislawski,
1983 & Klier, 1986)
6
Immigration from small cities and villages to the new urban centres diminished the role of
rabbis within the Jewish communities even further. In classical Jewish settlement rabbinical
institutions were part and parcel of the communal organization. In the beginning immigration
to the new settlements, like Odessa was not of groups or families but of individuals. A few men
and occasionally women came to the cities. The new comers lived within non Jewish
neighbourhoods, which changed their perceptions regarding non-Jews and made them realise
that Jews can live outside of Jewish Society.
Only after the number of immigrants justified it religious institutions (a synagogue for
example) were established and religious officials (rabbi for an example) were recruited. This
made religious observance very difficult to obtain. People began degrading the importance of
fulfilling the religious commandments – which were of utmost importance in Jewish religious
life. This is why in new townships, like Odessa, religious meticulousness ceased to be the basis
of communal existence. Thus rabbis and rabbinical establishments gradually became less
important.
Jews in Odessa
The first significant group of Jews came to Odessa only towards the 1850s (Shaw, 1988). Most
Jews in the Pale of Settlement lived in small townships known in Yiddish as “Shtetle”. Odessa
was by this time a Tax Free Port city, and most of the Town’s Jews dealt with small commerce
on the outskirts of the Port (Klier, 2001). With industrialization and the rising importance of
the Odessa port the Jewish population in Odessa grew (Hausmann, 1998), and in 1897 some
165,000 Jews lived in the city constituting 37% of its entire population (Based on Shaw 1988,
passim).
However the first Jews came to Odessa as individuals and only later, as the Jewish population
grew in the city, a community was established and rabbinical and all the religious apparatus
were created. Thus much of the Jews in Odessa were not very religious - to say the least. It’s
no wonder that the city of Odessa soon became one of the most important centres of the Jewish
Enlightenment Movement (Known in Hebrew as Haskalah) (Zipperstein, 1985).
Odessa - Sin City: Literary Myth and Historical Facts
Odessa was and is still known in Russian Folklore as the sin city or City of thieves (Stanton,
2008, Sylvester, 2005, Tanny 2009 & Tanny 2011). Much of the literal engagement in the
criminal activity in the late 19th and early 20th century is associated with Jews. Vanden Heuvel
7
claimed that Jewish writers portrayed port cities as sin cities.as a way of redefining Jewish
identity (Vanden Heuvel, 2012). However research shows that Jewish activity in criminal
activities in Odessa was less than the Jews percentage in the total population - still the image
remains (Sylvester, 2001).
Much of this is due to the portraying of the deviant activities of Jews in the writing of important
Jewish authors such as Isaac Babel (Babel, 2002; Freidin, 2010; Stanton, 2004) and others. The
villain hero in Babel’s work (especially his “Odessa tales”) was a character by the name of
Benya Krik (Babel, 1969). The portraying of this fictional hero is based on a real gang leader
in Odessa known as Mishka Yaponchik or Moyshe Yaponchik (whose real name Moisei
Wolfovich Vinnitskiy). Vinnitskiy's eye were slanted, resembling Japanese people eyes.
Yaponchik in Yiddish means Japanese.
The fictional Krik, who was also known as The King, was the leader of a group of thugs and
smugglers, who operated in the Jewish ghetto Moldavanka in Odessa (Barral, 2010). The real
Moisei Wolfovich Vinnitskiy, on the other hand, was born into a family of a Jewish wagon-
builder. Vinnitskiy was around 4 years old when his family moved to Odessa (indeed to
Moldavanka). Vinnitskiy's mother, Doba Zelmanovna, gave birth to five sons and a daughter.
Sometime in 1897 Mishka lost his father. At first he worked at a mattress factory as a trainee,
while also attending the Jewish school. Later, as an electrician, he received a job at the "Anatra"
factory (Briker, 1994).
At the time of the pogroms against the Jews in Odessa in October 1905 Vinnitskiy participated
in the Jewish self-defence activities. Later he joined the organization of anarchists-communists
Molodaia Volya (Young Will). It was probably during that time that he received his famous
street name, presumably for the shape of his eyes, even though there are other versions of the
origin of the nickname (Briker, 1994).
However fiction never represents real life3. Though Jewish criminals (real and fictional ones)
in Odessa were running contraband (GAOO, 1879-1889), this was not the main Jewish criminal
occupation.
3 Soviet television and Cinema recreated Babel’s stories embedding further the myth. See: O.
V. Budnitskiĭ, ‘La construction d'Odessa comme "mère du crime" ou comment Moïse
Vinnitski est devenu Benia Krik’, Kinojudaica les représentations des Juifs dans le cinéma de
Russie et d'Union soviétique des années 1910 aux années 1980. Sous la direction de Valérie
8
Two criminal fields were run mainly by Jews, not only in Odessa but in many other Port cities
like Istanbul (Turkey), Alexandria (Egypt), London (England), Marseille (France), New York
(USA) and especially Buenos Aires (Argentina). The first one was immigration related crimes
and the second and main one was trafficking and prostitution.
Immigration related Crime:
Jews were much if not the majority of immigrants from the Russian Empire from 1870 to 1914.
It was estimated that 2 million Jews left the Russian empire in those years (out of a total Jewish
population estimated at 5.5 million in 1880) (Alroey, 2014). Most immigrating Jews came
mainly from the inner parts of the pale of settlement. Many of them used Odessa as the
embankment point for their migration either to Central and West European ports or ports
Mediterranean ports (Hausmann, 2003 & Klier, 2001). Among other things the immigrants
needed:
Potential immigrants were waiting for immigration permissions near the Odessa port and other
Russian border towns. Here they needed assistance during the process of leaving the Russian
Empire. The need to provide temporary housing as well as obtaining documents vital for
immigration created the phenomenon of "migration agents", many of them criminals (Alroey,