The Kaizen of TWI - TWI Summittwisummit.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SOLTERO-TWI-Summit1.… · The Kaizen of TWI Its Kata For ... Check the impact of the solution. ... Develop
Post on 06-Feb-2018
223 Views
Preview:
Transcript
5/10/2013
1
The Kaizen of TWI
Its Kata
For
Continuing Sustainability
Introduction
Kaizen of TWI
• Kaizen Duality ‐ Balance
Kata for Sustainability
• Maintenance– Standardization
– Problem Solving
• Improvement
• Contrasts & Comparisons
• TWI – Maintain or Improve?
• What is a Kata?
• Adaptability
• Experimental results
• Practicing Improvement
• Practicing Standardizationp– JI
– JR
– JM
– JS
act c g Sta da d at o
• Practicing Problem Solving
5/10/2013
2
Using Kaizen to Reduce Waste and Prevent Pollution Conrad Soltero1, Gregory Waldrip2
Article first published online: 5 APR 2002 DOI: 10.1002/tqem.10026
5/10/2013
3
Type of Kaizen & Job Function
Top Management
Middle Management
Supervisors
IMPROVEMENT
MAINTENANCEp
Workers
‐Gemba KaizenMassaki Imai
5/10/2013
4
Improvement Kaizen
Problem Solving Standardization
Maintenance Kaizen“Maintaining the Status Quo”
Bring it back to standard Establishing the “Status Quo”
5/10/2013
7
1. Pick Up the Problem: Problem Consciousness PLAN
• Identify the problem that is a priority 1. Define the problem relative to the ideal.
2. Grasp the situation (Go and See) 2. Break down the problem into manageable
• Clarify the problem. pieces.
○ What should be happening? 3. Identify the root cause.
○ What is actually happening? 4. Develop alternate solutions.
○ Break the problem into individual 5. Evaluate and select the best solution based on
problems if necessary what is known
Problem Solving Kata & TBP 8 Steps
Steps for Practical Problem Solving TBP 8 Steps
problems if necessary what is known.
• If necessary use temporary measure to contain DO
the abnormal occurrence until the root cause 6. Implement the solution (on a trial basis if
can be addressed. possible).
• Locate the point of cause of the problem. Do CHECK
not go into cause investigation until you find 7. Check the impact of the solution.
the point of cause. ACT
• Grasp the tendency of the abnormal occurrence 8. Adjust, standardize, and spread based on what
at the point of cause. has been learned.
3. Investigate Causes
• Identify and confirm the direct cause of the
abnormal occurrence.
• Conduct a 5‐Why investigation to build a chain
f / ff l i hi of cause/effect relationships to root cause.
• Stop at the cause that must be addressed to
prevent recurrence.
4. Develop and Test Countermeasures
• Take one specific action to address the root
cause.
• Try to change only one factor at a time, so that
you can see correlation.
5. Follow Up
• Monitor and confirm results.
• Standardize successful countermeasure.
• Reflect. What did we learn during the problem ‐
solving process?
5/10/2013
10
PS Kata – Step 2
• Define gap
• Disaggregate the problem
• Containment
• Root cause
• Frequency of root cause
5/10/2013
16
5 Why Analysis
• Proposed root cause determined BEFORE use f 5 h l iof 5 why analysis.
• Bounded by:
– What is happening
– Perceived root cause.
• Sometimes root cause elimination impossible• Sometimes root cause elimination impossible.
• Work on cause closest to root cause.
• “Break the chain.”
5/10/2013
19
PS Kata – Step 4
• Experiment
• One action at a time!
PS Kata – Step 5
• Study experimental results
• Standardize solution
• Reflect
– What did you expect to happen?
– What did happen?
Wh t did l ?– What did you learn?
5/10/2013
20
Follow UpFollow Up
1. Verify Results2. Validate Results3. Standardize Results
REFLECTWhat did I learn?
5/10/2013
23
Improvement Kata
• Steps 1 & 2:D t i f– Determine performance gap
• Step 3:– Pick any obstacle to work on (doesn’t matter which)
• Step 4:– Experiment
• Step 5:– What did you learn?
Improvement Kata
• Assumes no problem(s)
• Aligns by the value stream “vision”
• Identifies quickly obtainable target condition
• Learning/understanding is progress
• Obstacles, not problems
• Many obstacles on the way to the vision
5/10/2013
30
Inculcating Adaptive Behavior Patterns in Complex OrganizationalPatterns in Complex Organizational
Systems
Conrad Soltero
Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering SystemsResearch Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems
University of Texas at El Paso
5/10/2013
31
Abstract
• From a systems engineering perspective, departmental alignment within the organization has always been a vexing challenge. At a more granular fractal the individual behaviors of managers andmore granular fractal, the individual behaviors of managers and value‐adders alike drive the organization’s ability to adapt to changing conditions. A comprehensive systems engineering approach to improvement is applied to organizational processes using engineering solutions while simultaneously instilling adaptive behavior patterns within its workforce.
• This applied systems research has been conducted in the most complex of healthcare environments. The healthcare system studied is publicly funded and charged with providing healthcarestudied is publicly funded and charged with providing healthcare services to a large population of unfunded and uninsured patients. Additionally, the research will demonstrate how adaptive behavior patterns are developed for the implementation of engineering solutions.
5/10/2013
33
Research Objective
• Understand which technique produces higher l l f d t bilit th PS I tlevels of adaptability, the PS or Improvement Kata.
• Reproduce Rother’s results.
• Assume: adaptability is based on the rate of PDCA cyclingPDCA cycling.
5/10/2013
34
Cultural Modifiers
• Habitual – daily
R i d f ll
• Interesting
F i t ti• Required of all
• Collaboration
• Ease of practice
• Achievement
• Gratification
• Fun ‐ experimentation
• Recognition
• Relevance
• Different kind of work
• Broaden system
• Succinct
yknowledge
5/10/2013
35
Adaptability
Kaizen Event Toyota Kata
• Improvement is the point
• Step function improvement
• Team based
• Selected individuals
• Up to 40 hours (1 week)
• Punctuated
• Learning is the point
• Incremental improvement
• Individual based
• All management
• 15 minutes daily
• Continual• Punctuated
• Project management
• Planning necessary
• Continual
• Highly scripted
• Easily performed
5/10/2013
36
Toyota Kata
The Toyota Kata as described by Rother is actually 3 distinct Katas:The Toyota Kata as described by Rother is actually 3 distinct Katas:
•The Improvement Kata
•The Problem Solving Kata
•The Coaching Katag
Kata Use ofStand Alone Features
• Genchi Gembutsu, Gemba Kaizen, GembaW lkWalks
• Kaizen Teian
• 5 Why analysis (PS Kata)
• Daily Improvement (Improvement Kata)
• Incremental improvement (Improvement Kata)
• Achieving conditions versusmetrics
5/10/2013
37
Kata Use of Stand Alone Features
• Conveys proper use of A3
G l t l t f t• Go slow to learn to go fast
• Advances explicit knowledge
• Enhances tacit knowledge
• Small experiments – sometimes big jumps
• Value stream analysisValue stream analysis
• Reflection
• Creation of teachers
Results
5/10/2013
38
Possible Reasons for SlowerPS Kata Cycling
• Extensive analysis of cause
• Investigation of cause
• Containment measures
• Iterative disaggregation of the problem
• Authorization of proposed countermeasure
• Learning by investigation and experiment
Conclusions
• The Improvement Kata is better suited for titi d t bilitpractitioner adaptability.
– More PDCA cycles
– Rapid learning
• Value stream analysis not necessary for PSValue stream analysis not necessary for PS Kata practice.
5/10/2013
39
Research Conclusions
• Problem Solving Kata (maintenance k i ) d b kill dkaizen)used by skilled managers knowledgeable of the Improvement Kata. Adaptability should have already been achieved.
• Improvement Kata (improvement kaizen) used by all managers. Helps achieve adaptability.
Practice
• Improvement – Scheduled
• Instruction – Scheduled
• Problem Solving – Upon incidence and case studies.
top related