LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
Post on 12-Feb-2018
248 Views
Preview:
Transcript
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
1/21
LR Verification Guidelines for the
application of the Performance
Standard for Protective Coatings PSPC)
for Dedicated Seawater Ballast Tanks
Version 05
Date: January 2013
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
2/21
2013 Version 05 1
MARINE SERVICES
Contents
1. Introduction. 2
2. Verification Requirements by the LR Surveyor
1. Before coating application is started 3
2. During coating application 7
3. After coating completion and prior to ship delivery 8
3. Procedural Flow Chart 9
APPENDIX 1 -CTF Check List. 10
APPENDIX 2
A1 Shop Priming Application 11
A2 Shop Priming Verification 12
B1 Verification Procedures PSPC- BWT 13
APPENDIX 3 - Example Working Records (for the Approved Inspector)
Coating Log Primary Surface Preparation. 16
Coating Log Edge and Weld Condition. 17
Coating Log Coating Application. 18
Coating Log DFT Measurement 19
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
3/21
2013 Version 05 2
MARINE SERVICES
1. Introduction
Lloyds Registers verification requirements and procedures for new
construction are to be built under the regulations detailed by the
documents listed below, collectively referred to as PSPC-BWTin this
document.
The related standards and documents for reference are:
It is anticipated that a pre- job meeting and agreement will be carried
out and form the basis of the verification guidelines, this should include
the items listed below but not be limited to this:
Confirmation of the coating suppliers, if not already agreed.
Coating Specification.
Treatment of fixtures and fittings, if not included in the coating
specification.
Inspection schedule and standards.
Number of tests to be carried out e.g. salt tests, profile
assessment, dust tape tests etc.
Applicators working procedures and equipment including e.g.
supervision organisation chart, experience of supervisors and
operatives, access to surfaces (staging), lighting, equipmentcapacities and availability etc.
All Shi T es
UI SC223
Z17
Rec.101
Rec.102
Rec.87
MSC.215 82
MSC.1/Cir. 1330
2
1
1 UI SC223 specifically makes all footnoted standards in
MSC.215(82) mandatory
2 Rec.87 and MSC.1/Cir 1330 refer to in-service inspection andmaintenance respectively
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
4/21
2013 Version 05 3
MARINE SERVICES
Applicators QC procedures (e.g. monitoring of ambient
conditions / ventilation and pre-official inspections for surface
preparation, cleaning, DFT etc.)
Communications including procedures for calling inspections
(e.g. minimum acceptable advance notice and acceptable
hours, including weekends evenings, holidays). Also
procedures for informing LR of forthcoming inspections. Reporting procedures and report formats (see Appendix 3 for
recommended reporting templates).
Procedures for reporting non-conformances and resolving
their satisfactory repair.
Appointment of the inspection body or bodies (i.e. shipyard,
coating supplier, ship owner, independent or a combination
of two or more).
Clarification of how many inspectors will be required.
Assistance to be given to the inspectors.
Names and qualifications of inspectors (copies of currentcertificates including information to allow traceability and
confirmation will be required).
Procedures for the settlement of disputes.
Health and safety.
The Lloyds Register PSPC-BWT new building verification process for
surveyors can be broken into three stages:
i. Before coating application is started.
ii. During coating application.
iii. After coating completion and prior to ship delivery.
Any deviation should be raised to the shipyard, or the Approved
Inspector, as deemed appropriate by LR.
In the event of corrective action a Class Certificate will not be issued
until all corrective actions have been closed out.
2.Verification Requirements by the LR Surveyor
2.1Before coating application is started
The minimum PSPC-BWT requirements are included in the CTF check list
(see appendix 1). The CTF is to be compiled by the shipyard before work
is started.
Notes:
The minutes of the pre job agreement are to be reviewed by LR.
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
5/21
2013 Version 05 4
MARINE SERVICES
Selection of coating System - See MSC 215(82) Table 1.1. The
criteria for selection are to be confirmed by the shipyard, ship
owner and coating supplier.
PSPC Type Approval Certificate or Statement of Compliance.
Details are held at LR London.
The PTDS will comply with The Type Approval Certificate.
The Coating Specification will include at least the following:
Sho p p rim er.
Manufacturer.
Name of Product.
Code of Product.
Type.
Specified DFT.
Surface Preparation.
Compatibility with the main coating.
Ma in Coa t ing
Manufacturer.
Name of Product.
Code of Product.
Type.
Number, sequence and colour of Full coats.
Method of Application (Airless Spray).
NDFT of Each Coat.
NDFT of the Total System.
Number, sequence and colour of Stripe coats includingmethod of application.
Surfa c e p rep a rat ion req uirem ents w ill inc lude
Intact shop primer.
Corrosion.
Broken down and damaged shop primer.
Block pre-erection (if applicable).
Erection welds.
Main ballast coating damages.
The MSC.215(82) specifies min imumsurface preparation and
application standards.
Any add i t iona lrequirements of the coating supplier, Flag, Class or
Owner should also be included into the specification.
All interpretations shall be in compliance with SC223.
The inspection and coating procedure stages should be agreed
between the ship-owner, shipyard and coating manufacturer.
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
6/21
2013 Version 05 5
MARINE SERVICES
Bodies responsible for inspection are required to provide the names of
their respective Approved Inspectors, together with verified copies of
the inspectors certificates. Evidence will be available to confirm that all
certificates are current.
If there is to be more than one inspection body, there must be a clear
line of authority.
Typical examples of the builders quality control documentation include
the following:
Shop Priming Plant Verification and Daily Record.
Daily Log - To list all inspections for each working day.
Preparation & Application Progress Report.
Block Report - Secondary Surface Preparation & Cleaning
Inspection Report.
Pre-Erection joint Report -Secondary Surface Preparation &Cleaning Inspection Report.
Hull Stage Erection Joint & Damages Report -Secondary
Surface. Preparation & Cleaning Inspection Report.
Block Report- Coating Inspection Report.
Block Pre-erection / Hull Stage Coating Inspection Report.
Pre-Delivery Inspection Report - (Completion Report).
Non Conformity Report.
The format of reports may vary as agreed between the shipyard, ship-
owner and the Approved Inspector but must comply with therequirements of the PSPC-BWT.
Note:The shop priming plant QC procedures will normally be subject to
a separate audit by the Approved Inspector.
The minimum QC Working Report contents for the PSPC-BWT (See
MSC.215(82) 3.4.2) are:
Applied Actual Space and area (in square metres) for each
compartment. Applied coating system.
Time of coating, thickness, number of layers.
Ambient conditions during coating.
Method of surface preparation.
Statement by the Approved Coating Inspector that the
coating was applied in accordance with the specifications
and to the satisfaction of the coating supplier representative.
Deviations from the specifications and their correction will be
reported.
LR will confirm the relevant boxes in the CTF Check List and the Shop-
priming Plant Verification as appropriate before work is started.
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
7/21
2013 Version 05 6
MARINE SERVICES
Verification Requirements:
All documentation required to satisfy the terms of the PSPC-BWT has
been prepared by the ship-yard as listed in the CTF Check List. LR will
complete a CTF Check List for each vessel to which the PSPC-BWT
regulations apply.
Inspection procedures have been agreed between the
shipyard, the ship owner and the main coating supplier before
work is started. These are most likely to be discussed and
agreed at a pre-job meeting or meetings. The pre-job
agreement must satisfy all of the requirements of the PSPC-
BWT and the shipyard is to present the minutes of the
agreement to LR for review. LR may also request to participate
in the pre-job agreement process.
That the Shop Priming Plant Verification Report (see Appendix
2) is available for the pre-job agreement process and that the
standards achieved are acceptable to the shop primer
supplier, the main coating supplier and the Approved
Inspector.
If the shop primed steel is purchased from a location or
supplier different from the shipyard, the steel shall have all the
relevant quality control documents from that supplier or
location, and that the local LR surveyor has witnessed andalso supplied the relevant completed forms. This also includes
finished or semi-finished blocks supplied from a different site or
manufacturer.
The shop primer must be approved in accordance with PSPC-
BWT otherwise it must be removed.
The Approved Inspector should participate in the shop primer
verification process as early as possible after being appointed. The
Approved Inspector will then be included as a signatory in theverification process. It may also be decided that the main coating
supplier participates in the verification process.
The shop-priming plant documentation may require modification
depending upon the agreed inspection bodies.
The date of the verification must be valid from the start of plate
processing.
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
8/21
2013 Version 05 7
MARINE SERVICES
2.2 During coating application
For Approved Inspectors unknown to Lloyds Register, verification will
be required as early as possible in the contract. For inspectors known to
LR or when acceptable standards have been established, spot check
verification is acceptable.
LR will record their monitoring verification details in the LR Form1215.
For automatic shop primer application regular audits of QC records,
without a physical check of the plants operations is acceptable.
Note: LR is to confirm that the ship yards QC system ensures that allcalibration certificates for inspection instruments are maintained up to
date. If not, LR will require all current certificates for review.
All sections of the form 1215pertaining to the relevant sections ofMSC.215 (82) section 6.2 and SC223 shall be completed on a regular
basis and be retained for future reference.
Details will include:
Area inspected.
Date & time.
Official report number.
Block or location on the vessel.
Approved Inspectors findings. Any unresolved disagreements between inspection bodies
and the eventual outcome.
NCR details, if applicable.
Verification Requirements:
Through document audits and / or physical spot checks, that all the
requirements of the PSPC-BWT are fulfilled.
Monitoring of the coating inspection requirements, as required by theMSC.215(82) (Section 7.5) means checking, on a representative
sampling basis, that the inspectors are using correct equipment,
techniques and reporting methods, as described in SC223.
This will require that the Approved Inspector physically demonstrates to
the LR Surveyor that inspection procedures are properly carried out and
are accurately recorded in the appropriate reports. Examples of these
reports are shown in Appendix 3.
An appropriatelevel of inspection should be agreed within the pre-jobagreement, for example:
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
9/21
2013 Version 05 8
MARINE SERVICES
Approximately 10% of block inspections.
A minimum of two hull stage tank inspections.
A minimum of two pre-delivery tank inspections.
The Approved Inspector should be able to show compliance to items
listed in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2.
Note: Non-conformances are to be documented in a Non -
Conformance Report (NCR) and closed off by the Approved
Inspector after correction.
Non-conformances are considered non-compliances, if the
shipyard or contractor refuses to repair, or where the repair is to
be carried out later in the contract, when the NCR will remain in
place to act as a reminder.
Routine requirements for repair after inspection will not be subject
to an NCR if repair is to be carried out immediately. Inspections
resulting in rejection should be detailed in the Preparation &
Application Progress Report.
2.3 After coating completion and prior to ship delivery
Verification Requirements:
The shipyard has completed the CTF in accordance with the
PSPC-BWT and that all relevant documentation required forthe CTF is included.
That the Approved Inspector(s) has signed all the relevant
reports confirming that standards complied with the
MSC.215(82) and all other agreed documentation, the PTDS
and were carried out to the satisfaction of the coating
supplier's representative.
That the owner has been given a copy of the CTF for
placement onboard.
Note:The CTF should include the maintenance specification.
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
10/21
2013 Version 05 9
MARINE SERVICES
3.0 . Procedural Flow Chart
The chart outlines the key stages listed in the PSPC-BWT requirements. Items 1 and 2 are to be agreed by the shipya
verification requirements are items 3 to 12. Example reports are attached for items 6 to items 11 in Appendix 1 and 2
1) Confirmation of Coating supplier,
and surface preparation
requirements
2) Selectioon of the coating system
(PSPC: Table 1.1.1)
3) Verification of Type Approval Certificate
and Contents of PTDS
(PSPC: 3.4.1,3.4.2 &7.2)
Details held centrally by LR.
8) Block surface preparation,
application and inspection
(PSPC: Table 1.3.1 & to 1.3,6) or in-
situ tank surface preparation and
coating application if not carried out
in block stage
7) Steel dressing & inspection
(PSPC Tables 1.3.1 and 6.2)
6) Confirmation of application conditions of
the shop primer
(PSPC: Tables1.2.1 to 1.2.3)
Confirmation of the location of all block and
tank coating operations i.e. shipyard or
external
9) Block pre-erection, surface
preparation, application and
inspection (If applicable)
10) Insitu Tank Erection and
Damage Inspection & repair
11) Pre-delivery (Completion Inspection,
repair and verification
(PSPC 1.3.C)
Notes:PSPC: IMO Resolution MSC,215(82) PSPC Performance standard for Protective Coatings for Dedicated Seawater Ball
Skin Spaces of Bulk Carriers
LRYAG: LR PSPC Yard Auditing Procedures
IACS UI SC223 For Application of SOLAS Regulation 11-1/3-2 Performance Standard for Protective Coatings (PSPC) for Dedicat
and Double-Side Skin Spaces of Bulk Carriers, adopted by Resolution MSC 215(82)
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
11/21
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
12/21
2013 Version 05 11
Appendix 2 A1
SHOP PRIMING PLANT VERIFICATION
AT
Shop Primer Manufacturer: ___________________________
Shop primer Name and Code: _________________________
The shipyard has copied Ballast/DSS coating suppliers the attached audit. The Ballast/DSS coating suppliers ha
the following standards for:
o Blasting and Profile
o Salt removal.
o Ambient application conditions
o Measured DFTs
The Ballast / DSS coating suppliers accept the primer and the conditions of its application as the substrate for sto be applied is in compliance with MSC.215(82).
The yard shall ensure that primers used are LR approved prefabrication primers and their compatibility with inte
been approved
On behalf of the ship-yard
__________________________________________ __________________________________ _____________________________
Signature Name Position
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
13/21
2013 Version 05 12
Appendix 2 A2SHOP PRIMING PLANT VERIFICATION
Shipyard or Contractor: Manufacturer:
Location: Date of Audit: Product Name & Code:
Standard Conditions and Settings Standardised Settings
General
Condit ion Before Blasting
Steel surface condition Grade 'B' or better
Oil and grease removal To be acceptable
Water removal To be acceptable
RH < 85%
Dew point 3 C
Surface Condition After blasting
Blast Standard - above Sa 2 ISO 8501 - 1 Or better
Blast Standard - below Sa 2 ISO 8501 - 1 or better
Blast Profile -above (shipyard to clarify method of test) 30-75m ISO 8501-1 and 2
Blast Profile - below (shipyard to clarify method of test) 30-75m ISO 8501-1 and 2
Salt contamination ISO 8502-9 or NACE SP0508-2010 50 mg/m2
Air temperature (range) C to C
Surface temperature (range) C to C
RH < 85%
Dew point 3 C
Application
Specified NDFT Min m Max m
Measured DFT - above (Smooth plate) Min m Max m
Measured DFT - below (Smooth plate) Min m Max m
Film continuity - above (viewed using clear film) Acceptable
Film continuity - below (viewed using clear film) Acceptable
Abrasive inclusion - above and below Acceptable
Date of introduction of this shop-primer variant The formulation wil l not be modif ied without prior approval of Lloyd's Registe
Applicator's QC: Date
Conditions confirmed and agreed:
Shop Primer Supplier: date Shisyard Date
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
14/21
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
15/21
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
16/21
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
17/21
2013 Version 05 16
COATING LOG (PRIMARY SURFACE PREPARATION)
Sheet No.
NAME/NO. OF SHIP
PLATE NUMBERS
INSPECTION DATE
ENVIRONMENT
BEFORE WEATHER CHANGES
MEASURED TIME
DRY TEMP. (C)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
DEW POINT (%)
SURFACE TEMP. (C)
REMARKS:
SURFACE PREPARATION
SURFACE PROFILES
WATER SOLUBLE SALTS(mg/m
2of NaCl)
REMARKS:
SHOP PRIMER
MANUFACTURER
PRODUCT NAME
IDENTIFICATION MARK/NUMBER
MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDED D.F.T.
MEASURED D.F.T.
CURING
REMARKS:
COATING INSPECTORS NAME:
SIGNATURE
Form PSP
Appendix 3
Example Reporting
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
18/21
2013 Version 05 17
COATING LOG (EDGE & WELD CONDITION)
Sheet No.
NAME/NO. OF SHIP
PART OF STRUCTURE(BLOCK /TANK No., etc.)
CONSTRUCTION STAGE BLOCK ASSEMBLY / ERECTION
STEEL ONDITION
Type of Defect Repair Method Repair Confirm / Date
SURFACE TREATMENT
INSPECTION DATE REMARKS
METHOD, GRADE
COATING INSPECTORS NAME:
SIGNATURE:
Form SSP
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
19/21
2013 Version 05 18
COATING LOG (COATING APPLICATION)
Sheet No.
FIRST COAT SECOND COAT
BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER
INSPECTION DATE
ENVIRONMENT
DRY TEMP. (C)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
DEW POINT (%)
SURFACE TEMP. (C)
WATER SOLUBLE SALTS (mg/m2
of NaCl) XX X
DUST X X X
OIL CONTAMINATION X X
ABRASIVE INCLUSION X X
STRIPE COATS
MANUFACTURER
PRODUCT NAME OF COATING
PRODUCT IDENTIFICATIONMARK/ NUMBER
REMARKS:
COATING INSPECTORS NAME:
SIGNATURE:
Form CA
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
20/21
2013 Version 05 19
COATING LOG (DRY FILM THICKNESS MEASUREMENT)
Sheet No.
NAME/NO. OF SHIP
PART OF STRUCTURE
(BLOCK /TANK No., etc.)CONSTRUCTION STAGE BLOCK ASSEMBLY / ERECTION
DRY FILM THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
DRY FILM THICKNESS (m) NUMBER OF POINTS RATIO
320 +
288 - 320
0 - 288
TOTAL 100%
MAXIMUM THICKNESS (m)
MINIMUM THICKNESS (m)
REMARKS:
FINAL COATING CONDITION
TYPE OF DEFECT REPAIR METHOD REPAIR DATE / CONFIRMED
COATING INSPECTORS NAME:
SIGNATURE:
Form DFT
7/23/2019 LR PSPC Verification Guidelines Version 5 January 2013
21/21
Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their
respective officers, employees or agents are, individually andcollectively, referred to in this clause as Lloyd's Register. Lloyd'sRegister assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to anyperson for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on theinformation or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unlessthat person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Registerentity for the provision of this information or advice and in that caseany responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditionsset out in that contract.
Lloyds Register 2013
top related