CMP Design Space Exploration Subject to Physical Constraints

CMP Design Space Exploration Subject to Physical Constraints

Yingmin Li, Benjamin Lee, David Brooks, Zhigang Hu, Kevin Skadron

HPCA’0601/27/2010

Issues

• Power and thermal issues are critical to architectural design

• Design space exploration under physical constraints– core count, pipeline depth, superscalar width,

L2 cache, and voltage and frequency, under area and thermal constraints

• Prior work– exclusively on performance or on single-core

Contributions

• Various new observations for the CMP design given the physical constraints

• Experiment methodology which largely reduces the cost of design space exploration

Approach• There are so many design parameters to

optimize and co-optimize• In this paper, several methods are used

– Modeling and approximation • Performance, power and area scaling• Temperature

– Decoupled core and interconnect/cache simulations. Simulation infrastructures are modular

– Simpoint for representative simulation points

Approach• Modeling

– Formulas to model the power and performance scaling and area for pipeline width and depth

– Temperature - at the granularity of core• Decoupled Simulation

– Use IBM’s Turnandot/PowerTimer to generate L2 cache-access traces – one time cost

– Feed the traces to Zauber, a cache simulator. – Interpolation

n

Approaches

• DVFS• Workloads

– SPEC 2000– CPU bound and memory bound

• Constraints– 200 + LR+ MEMORY (Area + Thermal + CPU/Memory)

• Performance and power/performance efficiency

Results

• Without constraints• CPU-bound benchmarks favor deeper

pipelines• Memory-bound benchmarks favor

shallower pipelines

With Area Constraints• To meet the area constraints,

– Workloads• Decrease the cache size for CPU-bound workloads• Decrease the number of cores for memory-bound

workloads– Pipeline dimensions

• Shifting to narrower widths provides greater area impact

• CPU-bound and memory-bound workloads have different, incompatible optima

Results

Optimal Configurations with Varying Pipeline Width, Fixed Depth (18FO4)

Results

Optimal Configurations with Varying Pipeline Depth, Fixed Width (4D)

With Thermal Constraints

• To meet the thermal constraints– Decrease the cache size for CPU-bound

workloads– Decrease the number of cores for Memory-

bound workloads

Thermal Constraints

• Thermal constraints exert great influence on the optimal design configurations

• Thermal constraints should be considered early in the design process

Conclusions

• Joint optimization across multiple design variables is necessary

• Thermal constraints appear to dominate other physical constraints and tend to favor shallower pipelines and narrower cores