YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS)

Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

3SAQS Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol Reflecting Reviewer Comments

University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA)

ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON)

July 28, 2014

Page 2: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

2

Four set of Comments provided on the draft 3SAQS 2011 Modeling Protocol (April 2014)• Responders:– U.S. EPA Region 8

• Gail Tonnesen, Rebecca Matichuk and Robin Coursen

– Mike Barna, NPS– Tammy Thomson, CSU/NPS– Brian Bohlmann, Wyoming DEQ

• Responses discussed on June 19, 2008 Conference Call• Response-to-Comments document dated July 22, 2014• Revised Draft 2011 Modeling Protocol (July 2014)

Page 3: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

Revised 3SAQS Draft 2011Modeling Protocol

• Main updates were:– Add description of 3SAQS

2015 Work– More details on MPE– Explanations

• Snow cover albedo• MOZART vs. GEOS-Chem• MEGAN vs. BEIS• PMDETAIL vs. SMARTFIRE

– Clarifications– Typos – Remove citations from

footnotes

Page 4: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

4

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 1.0 Introduction– Numerous language changes– Make clearer that 2011 platform not just for O&G– New Section 1.5.2 and Table 1.2• State Rulemakings that affect O&G Emissions

• 2.0 Model Selection– Made clear that CMAQ is being applied and part

of MPE and FY modeling (3SAQS 2015 SOW)• 3.0 Episode Selection (None)

4

Page 5: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

5

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 4.0 Domain Selection– Added 4 km plot

• 5.0 WRF Modeling– Winter O3 in 2015 SOW

Page 6: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

6

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 6.0 Emissions– Added justification for:• MEGAN vs. BEIS (Biogenics)• PMDETAIL vs. SMARTFIRE (Fires)

– Questions on SMOKE processing streams and requests for separating specific source categories• Updated Table 6-1 and text to be clearer which source

categories are being processed separately• Response-to-Comments responses to request for each

source category

Page 7: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

7

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 6.0 Emissions– Clarified Figure 6-1

Figure 6-1. List of counties in the three-state study region where targeted emission improvements were made.

3SAQS 4 km Domain

Page 8: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

8

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 6.0 Emissions– Separated discussion of development of 2011 and

2020 O&G emissions like was done for other source categories

– Clarified 2020 O&G projection assumptions:• State-provided – activity growth/decline and no

controls analysis• Survey-based – activity growth/decline and controls

analysis including no turnover assumption when decline

Page 9: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

9

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 7.0 Photochemical Modeling– Will configure CAMx/CMAQ and WRF for winter

ozone event modeling in 3SAQS 2015 SOW• Will include use of high snow cover albedo instead of

average value that is used for regional modeling

– Included new Table 7-2 listing CMAQ model configuration

Page 10: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

10

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 8.0 Model Performance Evaluation– Ozone performance metrics use 60 ppb threshold– Commit to evaluation for O3/PM precursors• No change, already in Protocol

– Evaluation against NH3 measurements• Added description of AMON network and commit to

use data in evaluation

Page 11: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

11

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 8.0 Model Performance Evaluation– Vertical Ozone Comparisons

• Protocol already mentions evaluation against ~50 ozonesonde released at Boulder, CO in 2011

• Researching questions regarding 2011 UGEWOS ozone soundings

– Snow Cover and Albedo• Will address in 3SAQS 2015 SOW when analyzing winter ozone

events

– Precipitation and Cloud Cover• Evaluation of WRF for monthly PRISM precipitation completed

– Questions regarding reliability of PRISM for summer convection– Future plans for use of daily PRISM data analysis fields

• Will examine cloud cover for winter ozone events

Page 12: Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)

12

Changes in Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol

• 8.0 Model Performance Evaluation– Diagnostic Model Outputs• Diagnostic sensitivity tests addressed in 3SAQS 2015

SOW with input from 3SAQS Technical Committee– Will include BC sensitivity if alternative BCM output available


Related Documents