The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory(GPATT)
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
It is not the intention of this theory to deny the Ancient Egyptians their own cultural and religious beliefs
concerning the Pyramids of Giza. However, inasmuch as it is reasonably certain that the Pharaohs of the 4th Dynasty
constructed the pyramids there in accordance with their own religious beliefs, they did so in accordance with a much more
ancient ‘sacred’ plan.
The pyramid builders ‘assimilated’ this ‘sacred’ plan into their own cultural and religious ideas of their time.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
”They [the temples] were built according to an architectural plan which was supposed to have been revealed in a codex that fell from the heavens
at Saqqara in the days of Imhotep.”
- Aldred 'The Egyptians', P32
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Around 12,500 years ago, towards the end of the last Ice Age, all life on Earth was suddenly and
dramatically impacted when a massive comet exploded over the North Atlantic ocean.
The effect of this cataclysmic event was truly devastating, wiping out all manner of plant and
animal life – including humans - in the northern hemisphere.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2083758,00.html
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The ‘race memory’ of this devastating event was passed into mankind’s earliest myths which
talk frequently of fire from the heavens followed by a terrible innundation.
But these are not the only things remembered inour most ancient myths:
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
And in those days, Noah saw the Earth had tilted and that its destruction was near.
- Book of Noah 65.1
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Behold, the Lord maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the
inhabitants thereof. The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression
thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again.
Book of Isaiah 24:1, 24:20
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.
Book of Revelation 6:12, 6:13, 6:14
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
‘Soon the fiery horses felt how their reins were in an unpractised hand. Rearing and swerving aside, they left their
wonted way; then all the earth was amazed to see that the glorious Sun, instead of holding his stately,
beneficent course across the sky, seemed to speed crookedly overhead and to rush down in wrath like a meteor.’
The Flood of Deucalion - The Illustrated Guide to Classical Mythology, p. 15-17
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
During the whole summer, the sun hid itself behind the clouds, as if unwilling to shine upon the earth. In the middle
of the quietude, the earth began to quake as if it was dying. The mountains opened up to vomit forth fire and flames. Some of them sunk under the earth while in other places
mountains rose out of the plains... Atland disappeared and the wild waves rose so high over the hills and dales that
everything was buried under the seas. Many people were swallowed up by the earth and others who had escaped
the fire perished in the waters.
- The Oera Linda Book
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
We have seen in the Giza Precession Wheel Theory (GPWT)how the date of these tumultuous events (c.10,500BC) has
been encoded into the monuments on the Giza plateau.
http://www.scottcreighton.co.uk/gc-totg.pps
If, as the Cahto Indians of California believe, ‘The Sky Fell’,might we not also find an indication of such a traumatic
and significant event also encoded into the Giza monuments?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
It is possible that this might indeed be the case ....
Note: Whilst the Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) proposes that the Great Pyramid of Giza serves as a ‘register’ of an Axial tilt of the Earth c. 10.500BC,
it is beyond the scope of this work to present the various theories that might explain the physical mechanism in which such an Earth tilt could occur.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Before we commence this investigation, let us take a fewmoments to familiarise ourselves with the key features
of the Great Pyramid.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The Capstone
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
South North
Missing Capstone
The Great Pyramid is missing its capstone. It is not known for certain if it was
ever actually in place. The GPATT will show thatthe GP never had its capstone and why this was so.
South North
Missing Capstone
The Great Pyramid is missing its capstone. It is not known for certain if it was
ever actually in place. The GPATT will show thatthe GP never had its capstone and why this was so.
The Main Chambers
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
South North
King’sChamber
The Main Chambers
South North
King’sChamber
Queen’sChamber
The Main Chambers
South North
King’sChamber
Queen’sChamber
GrandGallery
The Main Chambers
The ‘Air-Shafts’
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
South North
KCS45°
The ‘Air Shafts’
South North
KCN32.6°
KCS45°
The ‘Air Shafts’
South NorthQCS39.6°
KCN32.6°
KCS45°
The ‘Air Shafts’
South North
QCN39.1°QCS
39.6°
KCN32.6°
KCS45°
The ‘Air Shafts’
South North
QCN39.1°QCS
39.6°
KCN32.6°
KCS45°
The GPATT will offer an alternative purpose to each of the 4 so-called ‘Air Shafts’ of
the King’s and Queen’s Chambers.
NorthSouth
It is worth noting that the openings of the shafts in the Queen’s
Chamber had been sealed even from their construction and were discovered only by accident. It
seems this sealing was intentional – a fact that has Egyptologists
somewhat baffled.
The GPATT will explain this.
South North
Furthermore, unlike the King’s Chambershafts, the shafts in the Queen’s Chamber
do not extend to the pyramid exterior.
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a
long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for
such an unusual feature.
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a
long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for
such an unusual feature.
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a
long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for
such an unusual feature.
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a
long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for
such an unusual feature.
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a
long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for
such an unusual feature.
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a
long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for
such an unusual feature.
That the Earth ‘Fell’, and by how much, is clearlyencoded within the Great Pyramid.
Here’s how...
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
30
Course Level 30 represents30°N (i.e. Giza’s present latitude)
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
26.5°
Note how the base of the KC rests at Course Level 50
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
26.5°
This represents a differenceof 20°N of Giza’s present latitude
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
26.5°
Note how the base of the QC rests at Course Level 23.5
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
26.5°
This represents a differenceof 6.5°S of Giza’s present latitude
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
26.5°
Note the angle of theGrand Gallery – 26.5°
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
26.5°
This represents theEarth’s fall – 26.5°
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
And now for the Fall, symbolised in the Great Pyramidby the Grand Gallery
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
23.5
50
The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
Of course, if through the angle encoded into theGrand Gallery of the Great Pyramid we are being
told that c. 10,500BC the Earth tilted 26.5°, then we have to ask - in which direction did this tilt occur?
South to North?
or
North to South?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
To better understand the effects of a tiltingEarth, let us briefly consider the following 2D
example which shows how the latitudes ofvarious points can alter with an 82° North to South
tilt of the axis.
Note how the latitudes of those points nearestthe centre are affected the least by the tilt and
those points further from the centre are affected the most.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -33°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
C = 88°NC = 50°NC = 20°NC = 0°NC = 10°S
City Latitudes Pre 82° Earth Tilt
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -31°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -29°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -27°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -24°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -22°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -19°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -16°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -13°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -10°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -7°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity -3°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity 0°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +3°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +6°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +9°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +11°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +14°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +16°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +19°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +22°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +25°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +28°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +32°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +36°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +39°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +42°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +46°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
E
Obliquity +49°
W
S
N
70°N80°N
90°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
90°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
C = 12°N Diff -76°C = 47°N Diff - 3°C = 25°N Diff + 5°C = 0°N Diff 0°C = 28°N Diff +18°
City Latitudes Post 82° Earth Tilt
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Let us now briefly recap.
1. We are told the total tilt was 26.5° (angle of Grand Gallery).
2. This tilt had the effect of creating a 6.5° difference between latitude 23.5°N and Giza’s present latitude of 30 ° N (base course layer 23.5 of Queen’s Chamber)
3. This tilt had the effect of creating a 20° difference between latitude 50°N and Giza’s present latitude of 30°N (base course layer 50 of King’s Chamber).
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
We also know . . .
1. The present latitude of Giza - 30°N
2. The present obliquity of the Earth = 23.5°
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
There is, however, one piece of vital information that is still missing.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
We have yet to determine Giza’s former latitude.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Again, the ingenious Designers of theGreat Pyramid have not let us down and have
provided a quite unique mechanism through which they ‘encoded’ Giza’s former latitude and they did so in a very
clever and precise way.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Let us now return to the King’s Chamber
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
We can now begin to understand why theroof of the King’s Chamber was raised –
it ‘points’ to Giza’s former latitude!
South North
The ‘Relieving Chambers’
Indeed, it is not unreasonable to intepretthis aspect of the Great Pyramid’s design as
telling us that the ‘Roof of the World’ fell.
South North
South North
South North
South North
South North
South North
South North
And to return to the ‘Golden Age’ of theZep Tepi (First Time), we must raise the
roof (the Earth) to its former glory.
It must ‘point’ to Giza’s former latitude.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Here’s How . . .
What is interesting about the dimensions of the Great Pyramidis the significance of the Queen’s Chamber when we
circumscribe a circle around the pyramid.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The apex of the Queen’s Chamber formsthe centre of the circumscribed circle.
Note also how the apex of the Queen’sChamber passes through the apex of the
Great Pyramid.
The blue line acts as the Earth’s perpendicular.
So how does this tell us Giza’s former latitude?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
South North
24.5°
Imagine the King’s Chamber collapsed (i.e. the ‘Fallen Earth’). This would create an angle from the centre of the circle through the apex of the King’s Chamber roof of around 24.5°.
South North
24.5°
However, what we find when we ‘Raise the Roof’ with the relieving chambersis that a very different and deliberate angle is created.
South North
Let us now raise the roof of the KC to its proper height.
24.5°
South North
South North
South North
South North
South North
17°
The KC roof at its max height creates a 17° angle throughits apex from the perpendicular.
South North
17°
If the roof of the KC was any higher or lower, a different angle would result. So it seems that the roof of the KC was raised with theRelieving Chambers to a very specific height for a very specific reason – to ‘encode’ the 17° angle.
But why?
South North
17°
It is not unreasonable to intepret this to mean that the ‘roof of the world’ aboveGiza, shifted some 17° from its former latitude.
So, although the Earth tilted 26.5° overall, it seems the effect ofthis tilt was to shift Giza some 17° south of its former latitude.
When added to Giza’s present latitude of 30°N, this givesGiza’s former (pre-tilt) latitude of 47°N.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
This tells us then that the 26.5° tilt of the Earth must haveoccurred in a North to South direction. This, in turn,
implies that the Earth’s former obliquity was much more upright at around -3° i.e. (26.5° - 23.5° = 3°)
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
These values are further validated when we cross-check them with the course layers we find in the Great Pyramid for the King and
Queen’s Chambers.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
23.5
50
26.5°
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
Total Diff = 26.5
23.5
50
26.5°
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
30
Diff = 20Giza’s Present Latitude
23.5
50
26.5°
Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/
30Diff = 6.5
Giza’s Present Latitude
We can now plot these values on a globe.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
© 2006/2007 Scott CreightonS
90°S
Giza Latitude Pre 26.5° Earth Tilt (Former)
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
Giza 47°N
80°N
17°
N
20° Obliquity -3°
© 2006/2007 Scott CreightonS
N
90°S
Giza Latitude Pre 26.5° Earth Tilt (Former)
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
Giza 47°N
80°N
Obliquity -3°
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity -1°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity 0°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +1°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +2°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +3°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +4°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +6°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +8°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +10°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +12°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +15°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +18°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +20°
S
N
90°S
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Obliquity +23.5°
S
N
90°S
Giza Latitude Post 26.5° Earth Tilt (Present)
90°N
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
Giza 30°N
80°N
© 2006/2007 Scott CreightonS
90°S
Giza Latitude Post 26.5° Earth Tilt (Present)
EW
70°N
E10°N
20°N30°N
40°N50°N
60°N
10°S
20°S30°S
40°S50°S
60°S70°S
80°S
Giza 30°N
80°N90°N
17°
20°
N
6.5°Obliquity +23.5°
The course layers of the GP ‘encodes’ the Earth tilt c. 10,500BC
(6.5°+20° = 26.5°)
Grand Gallery Angle = 26.5°
In a more ‘upright’ world with an obliquity of only 3°, there wouldbe very little seasonal change. In the lower latitudes this
would have seemed like a perpetual spring and summer – a Golden Age. Large areas that are presently in the
Polar regions would have seen a much more temperate climate andvice versa. Giza, being around 1200 miles further North,
would most likely have had a much wetter climate than it does today. Most of Canada, North America and large parts of
Europe would have lay under a thick blanket of ice.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Pre-Tilt EarthC. 10,500BC
The Capstone
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The missing capstone of the GP may also be symbolic of a tilted Earth. The apex of the Great Pyramid can no longer point to the skies of the ‘First Time’ because they have been removed out of their place (i.e. they are now 17° further north).
The missing capstone of the GP may also be symbolic of a tilted Earth. The apex of the Great Pyramid can no longer point to the skies of the ‘First Time’ because they have been removed out of their place (i.e. they are now 17° further north).
Might we find the capstone of the GP some 1200 miles further north?
And there is one more thing the missingCapstone of the Great Pyramid may be
alluding to . . .
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
We draw a horizontal line across the top of the GP until it intersects the circle.
We draw a horizontal line across the top of the GP until it intersects the circle.
When we draw a line from the centre of the circle through the intersectionwe find something quite interesting....
When we draw a line from the centre of the circle through the intersectionwe find something quite interesting....
The missing Capstone of the Great Pyramid may have been intended in orderthat the structure can indicate the 23.5° obliquity of the Earth.
The ‘Air Shafts’
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The 4 shafts in the Great Pyramid of Khufu at Gizahave so far defied all attempts by Egyptologists
to explain their true purpose.
Many theories have been proposed and yet the true purpose of these enigmatic features eludes us still.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Although not universally accepted, presently the most popular and widely accepted view is that c. 2,500 BC these unique
shafts were aimed at 4 key stars in the northern and southern skies that were important to the cultural and religious beliefs
of the Ancient Egyptians of the 4th Dynasty, whereby they apparently aided the departed King’s soul in findng its
way on the long and arduous journey into the afterlife.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
So – what did the original designers of the Giza plan have in mind for these 4 shafts which the Ancient Egyptians
of the 4th Dynasty so faithfully implemented?
What was the true purpose of these quite unique features?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Could it be that the purpose of the 2 sets of shafts is toprovide a ‘corroborating mechanism’ to the Earth tilt theory?
When we consider that every other aspect of the Giza design indicates the remote date of c.10,500BC, why should
it be considered logical or sensible that the shafts should indicate another date separated from the design layout
by some 8,000 years, as has been proposed by someacademics and writers?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
It stands to reason that if every other aspect of the Giza design is ‘locked’ to the ‘First Time’ date of c.10,500BC then so too must the shafts.
And so, following this logic, might not it be possible that, rather than targeting 4 individual stars c.2,500BC as some have proposed, the
pyramid shafts are in actual fact targeting the SAME 2 stars (c.10,500BC)?
Each chamber in the Great Pyramid has 2 small shafts – one shaft is directed due south whilst the other is
directed due north.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
But how is it possible that, from the same latitude (Giza), two sets of shafts with different inclinations can target the same stars at the same
moment in time?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
They can’t.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
However, the same two stars can be targeted with the two sets of shafts if a second location at a slightly different latitude is introduced.
Since we now know the epoch from the Giza layout (c. 10,500BC), it should (in theory at least) be possible using
star-mapping software to determine which stars the shafts were targeting in the northern and southern
skies at this time.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Once we have found stars that the Queen’s shaftsmay have been targeting c. 10,500BC, we can then attempt to
align these same stars with the King’s Chamber shafts bychanging the location (latitude).
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Targeting the Queen’s Chamber shafts.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 29.96°N (Present)QC North Shaft Directed to Vega
Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 29.96°N (Present)QC South Shaft Directed to Alpha Centauri
VegaAlpha Centauri
Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 29.96°N (Present)
Targeting the King’s Chamber shafts.
This requires a shift in location (latitude) to 23.5°N(i.e. 6.5° south of Giza’s present latitude)
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 23.5°NKC North Shaft Directed to Vega
Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 23.5°NKC South Shaft Directed to Alpha Centauri
VegaAlpha Centauri
Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 23.5°N
So, as has been demonstrated, it is quite possible to targetthe same 2 stars from different latitudes (locations) using the
inclinations of the 2 sets of GP shafts.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
But if the shafts are indeed meant to target the same 2 starswhy build the two sets of shafts into the one structure at the
one location?
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The logic is quite inescapable.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
The logic is quite inescapable.
In order to be able to target the same 2 stars from the same location (i.e. from the GP) using shafts of differing inclinations
requires that the Earth MUST BE TILTED in a north to south direction.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
And, of course, since the sky tilted and the stars moved fromtheir stations, then the two stars targeted by the shafts will
have gone from one place to another and will betargeted now by only one set of shafts and ‘lost’ to the other
two shafts.
This may explain why the Queen’s shafts are blocked – it issymbolic of the stars that are now ‘lost’ – they can no longer
be targeted from this location.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
Pre-Tilt Sky Star Map
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Post-Tilt Sky Star Map
Vega
AlphaCentauri
Conclusion
The Great Pyramid of Giza was designed in such a way asto record a tilt in the Earth’s axis of some 26.5° from a former
upright axis of -3° to its present axis of 23.5°. It recordsa former latitude for Giza at 47°N. The ‘Air Shafts’corroborate the Earth tilt by targteting 2 stars and
presenting them at different latitudes from a single location(i.e. from within the GP) thus indicating that the stars moved out
of their places to align with the 2 sets of shafts.
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
THE END
© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton