Top Banner
The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton
193
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory(GPATT)

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 2: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

It is not the intention of this theory to deny the Ancient Egyptians their own cultural and religious beliefs

concerning the Pyramids of Giza. However, inasmuch as it is reasonably certain that the Pharaohs of the 4th Dynasty

constructed the pyramids there in accordance with their own religious beliefs, they did so in accordance with a much more

ancient ‘sacred’ plan.

The pyramid builders ‘assimilated’ this ‘sacred’ plan into their own cultural and religious ideas of their time.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 3: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

”They [the temples] were built according to an architectural plan which was supposed to have been revealed in a codex that fell from the heavens

at Saqqara in the days of Imhotep.”

 - Aldred 'The Egyptians', P32

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 4: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Around 12,500 years ago, towards the end of the last Ice Age, all life on Earth was suddenly and

dramatically impacted when a massive comet exploded over the North Atlantic ocean.

The effect of this cataclysmic event was truly devastating, wiping out all manner of plant and

animal life – including humans - in the northern hemisphere.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2083758,00.html

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 5: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The ‘race memory’ of this devastating event was passed into mankind’s earliest myths which

talk frequently of fire from the heavens followed by a terrible innundation.

But these are not the only things remembered inour most ancient myths:

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 6: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

And in those days, Noah saw the Earth had tilted and that its destruction was near.

- Book of Noah 65.1

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 7: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Behold, the Lord maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the

inhabitants thereof. The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression

thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again.

Book of Isaiah 24:1, 24:20

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 8: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.

And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.

Book of Revelation 6:12, 6:13, 6:14

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 9: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

‘Soon the fiery horses felt how their reins were in an unpractised hand. Rearing and swerving aside, they left their

wonted way; then all the earth was amazed to see that the glorious Sun, instead of holding his stately,

beneficent course across the sky, seemed to speed crookedly overhead and to rush down in wrath like a meteor.’

The Flood of Deucalion - The Illustrated Guide to Classical Mythology, p. 15-17

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 10: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

During the whole summer, the sun hid itself behind the clouds, as if unwilling to shine upon the earth. In the middle

of the quietude, the earth began to quake as if it was dying. The mountains opened up to vomit forth fire and flames. Some of them sunk under the earth while in other places

mountains rose out of the plains... Atland disappeared and the wild waves rose so high over the hills and dales that

everything was buried under the seas. Many people were swallowed up by the earth and others who had escaped

the fire perished in the waters.

- The Oera Linda Book

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 11: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

We have seen in the Giza Precession Wheel Theory (GPWT)how the date of these tumultuous events (c.10,500BC) has

been encoded into the monuments on the Giza plateau.

http://www.scottcreighton.co.uk/gc-totg.pps

If, as the Cahto Indians of California believe, ‘The Sky Fell’,might we not also find an indication of such a traumatic

and significant event also encoded into the Giza monuments?

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 12: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

It is possible that this might indeed be the case ....

Note: Whilst the Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) proposes that the Great Pyramid of Giza serves as a ‘register’ of an Axial tilt of the Earth c. 10.500BC,

it is beyond the scope of this work to present the various theories that might explain the physical mechanism in which such an Earth tilt could occur.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 13: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Before we commence this investigation, let us take a fewmoments to familiarise ourselves with the key features

of the Great Pyramid.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 14: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The Capstone

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 15: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Missing Capstone

The Great Pyramid is missing its capstone. It is not known for certain if it was

ever actually in place. The GPATT will show thatthe GP never had its capstone and why this was so.

Page 16: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Missing Capstone

The Great Pyramid is missing its capstone. It is not known for certain if it was

ever actually in place. The GPATT will show thatthe GP never had its capstone and why this was so.

Page 17: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The Main Chambers

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 18: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

King’sChamber

The Main Chambers

Page 19: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

King’sChamber

Queen’sChamber

The Main Chambers

Page 20: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

King’sChamber

Queen’sChamber

GrandGallery

The Main Chambers

Page 21: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The ‘Air-Shafts’

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 22: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

KCS45°

The ‘Air Shafts’

Page 23: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

KCN32.6°

KCS45°

The ‘Air Shafts’

Page 24: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South NorthQCS39.6°

KCN32.6°

KCS45°

The ‘Air Shafts’

Page 25: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

QCN39.1°QCS

39.6°

KCN32.6°

KCS45°

The ‘Air Shafts’

Page 26: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

QCN39.1°QCS

39.6°

KCN32.6°

KCS45°

The GPATT will offer an alternative purpose to each of the 4 so-called ‘Air Shafts’ of

the King’s and Queen’s Chambers.

Page 27: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

NorthSouth

It is worth noting that the openings of the shafts in the Queen’s

Chamber had been sealed even from their construction and were discovered only by accident. It

seems this sealing was intentional – a fact that has Egyptologists

somewhat baffled.

The GPATT will explain this.

Page 28: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Furthermore, unlike the King’s Chambershafts, the shafts in the Queen’s Chamber

do not extend to the pyramid exterior.

Page 29: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 30: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a

long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for

such an unusual feature.

Page 31: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a

long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for

such an unusual feature.

Page 32: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a

long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for

such an unusual feature.

Page 33: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a

long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for

such an unusual feature.

Page 34: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a

long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for

such an unusual feature.

Page 35: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

The purpose of the elevated roof of the King’s Chamber has been a

long-standing mystery. The GPATT will explain the reason for

such an unusual feature.

Page 36: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

That the Earth ‘Fell’, and by how much, is clearlyencoded within the Great Pyramid.

Here’s how...

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 37: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

30

Course Level 30 represents30°N (i.e. Giza’s present latitude)

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 38: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

Note how the base of the KC rests at Course Level 50

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 39: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

This represents a differenceof 20°N of Giza’s present latitude

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 40: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

Note how the base of the QC rests at Course Level 23.5

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 41: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

This represents a differenceof 6.5°S of Giza’s present latitude

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 42: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

Note the angle of theGrand Gallery – 26.5°

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 43: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

This represents theEarth’s fall – 26.5°

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 44: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

And now for the Fall, symbolised in the Great Pyramidby the Grand Gallery

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 45: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 46: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 47: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 48: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 49: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 50: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 51: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 52: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 53: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 54: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 55: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 56: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 57: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

The Earth ‘Falls’ 26.5°Drawing courtesy of Jon B.

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Page 58: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Of course, if through the angle encoded into theGrand Gallery of the Great Pyramid we are being

told that c. 10,500BC the Earth tilted 26.5°, then we have to ask - in which direction did this tilt occur?

South to North?

or

North to South?

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 59: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

To better understand the effects of a tiltingEarth, let us briefly consider the following 2D

example which shows how the latitudes ofvarious points can alter with an 82° North to South

tilt of the axis.

Note how the latitudes of those points nearestthe centre are affected the least by the tilt and

those points further from the centre are affected the most.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 60: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -33°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

C = 88°NC = 50°NC = 20°NC = 0°NC = 10°S

City Latitudes Pre 82° Earth Tilt

Page 61: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -31°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 62: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -29°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 63: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -27°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 64: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -24°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 65: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -22°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 66: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -19°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 67: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -16°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 68: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -13°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 69: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -10°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 70: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -7°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 71: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity -3°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 72: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity 0°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 73: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +3°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 74: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +6°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 75: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +9°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 76: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +11°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 77: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +14°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 78: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +16°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 79: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +19°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 80: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +22°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 81: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +25°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 82: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +28°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 83: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +32°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 84: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +36°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 85: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +39°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 86: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +42°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 87: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +46°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Page 88: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

E

Obliquity +49°

W

S

N

70°N80°N

90°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

90°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

C = 12°N Diff -76°C = 47°N Diff - 3°C = 25°N Diff + 5°C = 0°N Diff 0°C = 28°N Diff +18°

City Latitudes Post 82° Earth Tilt

Page 89: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Let us now briefly recap.

1. We are told the total tilt was 26.5° (angle of Grand Gallery).

2. This tilt had the effect of creating a 6.5° difference between latitude 23.5°N and Giza’s present latitude of 30 ° N (base course layer 23.5 of Queen’s Chamber)

3. This tilt had the effect of creating a 20° difference between latitude 50°N and Giza’s present latitude of 30°N (base course layer 50 of King’s Chamber).

Page 90: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

We also know . . .

1. The present latitude of Giza - 30°N

2. The present obliquity of the Earth = 23.5°

Page 91: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

There is, however, one piece of vital information that is still missing.

Page 92: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

We have yet to determine Giza’s former latitude.

Page 93: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Again, the ingenious Designers of theGreat Pyramid have not let us down and have

provided a quite unique mechanism through which they ‘encoded’ Giza’s former latitude and they did so in a very

clever and precise way.

Page 94: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Let us now return to the King’s Chamber

Page 95: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

We can now begin to understand why theroof of the King’s Chamber was raised –

it ‘points’ to Giza’s former latitude!

Page 96: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

The ‘Relieving Chambers’

Indeed, it is not unreasonable to intepretthis aspect of the Great Pyramid’s design as

telling us that the ‘Roof of the World’ fell.

Page 97: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 98: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 99: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 100: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 101: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 102: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 103: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

And to return to the ‘Golden Age’ of theZep Tepi (First Time), we must raise the

roof (the Earth) to its former glory.

It must ‘point’ to Giza’s former latitude.

Page 104: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Here’s How . . .

Page 105: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

What is interesting about the dimensions of the Great Pyramidis the significance of the Queen’s Chamber when we

circumscribe a circle around the pyramid.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 106: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.
Page 107: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.
Page 108: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.
Page 109: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.
Page 110: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The apex of the Queen’s Chamber formsthe centre of the circumscribed circle.

Page 111: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Note also how the apex of the Queen’sChamber passes through the apex of the

Great Pyramid.

Page 112: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The blue line acts as the Earth’s perpendicular.

Page 113: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

So how does this tell us Giza’s former latitude?

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 114: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

24.5°

Imagine the King’s Chamber collapsed (i.e. the ‘Fallen Earth’). This would create an angle from the centre of the circle through the apex of the King’s Chamber roof of around 24.5°.

Page 115: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

24.5°

However, what we find when we ‘Raise the Roof’ with the relieving chambersis that a very different and deliberate angle is created.

Page 116: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Let us now raise the roof of the KC to its proper height.

24.5°

Page 117: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 118: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 119: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 120: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

Page 121: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

17°

The KC roof at its max height creates a 17° angle throughits apex from the perpendicular.

Page 122: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

17°

If the roof of the KC was any higher or lower, a different angle would result. So it seems that the roof of the KC was raised with theRelieving Chambers to a very specific height for a very specific reason – to ‘encode’ the 17° angle.

But why?

Page 123: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

South North

17°

It is not unreasonable to intepret this to mean that the ‘roof of the world’ aboveGiza, shifted some 17° from its former latitude.

Page 124: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

So, although the Earth tilted 26.5° overall, it seems the effect ofthis tilt was to shift Giza some 17° south of its former latitude.

When added to Giza’s present latitude of 30°N, this givesGiza’s former (pre-tilt) latitude of 47°N.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 125: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

This tells us then that the 26.5° tilt of the Earth must haveoccurred in a North to South direction. This, in turn,

implies that the Earth’s former obliquity was much more upright at around -3° i.e. (26.5° - 23.5° = 3°)

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 126: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

These values are further validated when we cross-check them with the course layers we find in the Great Pyramid for the King and

Queen’s Chambers.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 127: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

Total Diff = 26.5

Page 128: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

30

Diff = 20Giza’s Present Latitude

Page 129: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

23.5

50

26.5°

Drawing courtesy of Jon B.http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

30Diff = 6.5

Giza’s Present Latitude

Page 130: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

We can now plot these values on a globe.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 131: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott CreightonS

90°S

Giza Latitude Pre 26.5° Earth Tilt (Former)

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Giza 47°N

80°N

17°

N

20° Obliquity -3°

Page 132: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott CreightonS

N

90°S

Giza Latitude Pre 26.5° Earth Tilt (Former)

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Giza 47°N

80°N

Obliquity -3°

Page 133: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity -1°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 134: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity 0°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 135: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +1°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 136: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +2°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 137: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +3°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 138: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +4°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 139: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +6°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 140: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +8°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 141: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +10°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 142: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +12°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 143: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +15°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 144: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +18°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 145: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +20°

S

N

90°S

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

80°N

Page 146: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Obliquity +23.5°

S

N

90°S

Giza Latitude Post 26.5° Earth Tilt (Present)

90°N

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Giza 30°N

80°N

Page 147: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott CreightonS

90°S

Giza Latitude Post 26.5° Earth Tilt (Present)

EW

70°N

E10°N

20°N30°N

40°N50°N

60°N

10°S

20°S30°S

40°S50°S

60°S70°S

80°S

Giza 30°N

80°N90°N

17°

20°

N

6.5°Obliquity +23.5°

Page 148: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The course layers of the GP ‘encodes’ the Earth tilt c. 10,500BC

(6.5°+20° = 26.5°)

Grand Gallery Angle = 26.5°

Page 149: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

In a more ‘upright’ world with an obliquity of only 3°, there wouldbe very little seasonal change. In the lower latitudes this

would have seemed like a perpetual spring and summer – a Golden Age. Large areas that are presently in the

Polar regions would have seen a much more temperate climate andvice versa. Giza, being around 1200 miles further North,

would most likely have had a much wetter climate than it does today. Most of Canada, North America and large parts of

Europe would have lay under a thick blanket of ice.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 150: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Pre-Tilt EarthC. 10,500BC

Page 151: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The Capstone

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 152: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The missing capstone of the GP may also be symbolic of a tilted Earth. The apex of the Great Pyramid can no longer point to the skies of the ‘First Time’ because they have been removed out of their place (i.e. they are now 17° further north).

Page 153: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The missing capstone of the GP may also be symbolic of a tilted Earth. The apex of the Great Pyramid can no longer point to the skies of the ‘First Time’ because they have been removed out of their place (i.e. they are now 17° further north).

Might we find the capstone of the GP some 1200 miles further north?

Page 154: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

And there is one more thing the missingCapstone of the Great Pyramid may be

alluding to . . .

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 155: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

We draw a horizontal line across the top of the GP until it intersects the circle.

Page 156: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

We draw a horizontal line across the top of the GP until it intersects the circle.

Page 157: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

When we draw a line from the centre of the circle through the intersectionwe find something quite interesting....

Page 158: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

When we draw a line from the centre of the circle through the intersectionwe find something quite interesting....

Page 159: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The missing Capstone of the Great Pyramid may have been intended in orderthat the structure can indicate the 23.5° obliquity of the Earth.

Page 160: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The ‘Air Shafts’

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 161: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The 4 shafts in the Great Pyramid of Khufu at Gizahave so far defied all attempts by Egyptologists

to explain their true purpose.

Many theories have been proposed and yet the true purpose of these enigmatic features eludes us still.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 162: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Although not universally accepted, presently the most popular and widely accepted view is that c. 2,500 BC these unique

shafts were aimed at 4 key stars in the northern and southern skies that were important to the cultural and religious beliefs

of the Ancient Egyptians of the 4th Dynasty, whereby they apparently aided the departed King’s soul in findng its

way on the long and arduous journey into the afterlife.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 163: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

So – what did the original designers of the Giza plan have in mind for these 4 shafts which the Ancient Egyptians

of the 4th Dynasty so faithfully implemented?

What was the true purpose of these quite unique features?

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 164: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Could it be that the purpose of the 2 sets of shafts is toprovide a ‘corroborating mechanism’ to the Earth tilt theory?

When we consider that every other aspect of the Giza design indicates the remote date of c.10,500BC, why should

it be considered logical or sensible that the shafts should indicate another date separated from the design layout

by some 8,000 years, as has been proposed by someacademics and writers?

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 165: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

It stands to reason that if every other aspect of the Giza design is ‘locked’ to the ‘First Time’ date of c.10,500BC then so too must the shafts.

And so, following this logic, might not it be possible that, rather than targeting 4 individual stars c.2,500BC as some have proposed, the

pyramid shafts are in actual fact targeting the SAME 2 stars (c.10,500BC)?

Page 166: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Each chamber in the Great Pyramid has 2 small shafts – one shaft is directed due south whilst the other is

directed due north.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 167: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

But how is it possible that, from the same latitude (Giza), two sets of shafts with different inclinations can target the same stars at the same

moment in time?

Page 168: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

They can’t.

Page 169: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

However, the same two stars can be targeted with the two sets of shafts if a second location at a slightly different latitude is introduced.

Page 170: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Since we now know the epoch from the Giza layout (c. 10,500BC), it should (in theory at least) be possible using

star-mapping software to determine which stars the shafts were targeting in the northern and southern

skies at this time.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 171: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Once we have found stars that the Queen’s shaftsmay have been targeting c. 10,500BC, we can then attempt to

align these same stars with the King’s Chamber shafts bychanging the location (latitude).

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 172: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Targeting the Queen’s Chamber shafts.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 173: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 29.96°N (Present)QC North Shaft Directed to Vega

Page 174: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 29.96°N (Present)QC South Shaft Directed to Alpha Centauri

Page 175: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

VegaAlpha Centauri

Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 29.96°N (Present)

Page 176: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Targeting the King’s Chamber shafts.

This requires a shift in location (latitude) to 23.5°N(i.e. 6.5° south of Giza’s present latitude)

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 177: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 23.5°NKC North Shaft Directed to Vega

Page 178: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 23.5°NKC South Shaft Directed to Alpha Centauri

Page 179: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

VegaAlpha Centauri

Giza - 10,550BC – Latitude 23.5°N

Page 180: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

So, as has been demonstrated, it is quite possible to targetthe same 2 stars from different latitudes (locations) using the

inclinations of the 2 sets of GP shafts.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 181: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

But if the shafts are indeed meant to target the same 2 starswhy build the two sets of shafts into the one structure at the

one location?

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 182: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The logic is quite inescapable.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 183: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

The logic is quite inescapable.

In order to be able to target the same 2 stars from the same location (i.e. from the GP) using shafts of differing inclinations

requires that the Earth MUST BE TILTED in a north to south direction.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 184: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

And, of course, since the sky tilted and the stars moved fromtheir stations, then the two stars targeted by the shafts will

have gone from one place to another and will betargeted now by only one set of shafts and ‘lost’ to the other

two shafts.

This may explain why the Queen’s shafts are blocked – it issymbolic of the stars that are now ‘lost’ – they can no longer

be targeted from this location.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 185: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Pre-Tilt Sky Star Map

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 186: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 187: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 188: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 189: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 190: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 191: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Post-Tilt Sky Star Map

Vega

AlphaCentauri

Page 192: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

Conclusion

The Great Pyramid of Giza was designed in such a way asto record a tilt in the Earth’s axis of some 26.5° from a former

upright axis of -3° to its present axis of 23.5°. It recordsa former latitude for Giza at 47°N. The ‘Air Shafts’corroborate the Earth tilt by targteting 2 stars and

presenting them at different latitudes from a single location(i.e. from within the GP) thus indicating that the stars moved out

of their places to align with the 2 sets of shafts.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Page 193: The Great Pyramid Axial Tilt Theory (GPATT) © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton.

THE END

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton