OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)

8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 1/17

Get here. Get there. Get home. 1

Master Plan Study Update

OKI Regional Planning Forum

February 24, 2012



Get here. Get there. Get home.

Agenda

• Master Plan Process

• Forecast Review

•Terminal Area Alternatives Discussion

• Next Steps

2DRAFT for Discussion




Forecast Discussion

• Baseline Forecast used for financial planning while

Multi-Carrier Forecast used for facility planning

• Planning Activity Levels (PALS) will be defined as

triggers for growth – Actual activity levels can be easily monitored and

compared to PALs to project when facilities may be

needed

– Activity levels are reached at different years in the variousforecasts

– Use of PALs allows flexibility to act as demand materializes





Enplanements Forecast

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

1991 1998 2005 2012 2019 2026 2033

CVG Enplanements - Historical and Forecast1991 - 2035 (thousands)

Historical Originating Historical ConnectingDominant Carrier + LCC Enplanements Multi-Carrier EnplanementsHistorical Trend Enplanements Enplanements - Baseline Derivation2007 MPU 2011 TAF

Market stimulationincreases O&D trafficin near term

2007 MPU Forecast

DRAFT for Discussion 4




Passenger Aircraft Departures

2007 MPU Forecast

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

1 9 9 1

1 9 9 2

1 9 9 3

1 9 9 4

1 9 9 5

1 9 9 6

1 9 9 7

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 9

2 0 0 0

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 2

2 0 0 3

2 0 0 4

2 0 0 5

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 1 2

2 0 1 3

2 0 1 4

2 0 1 5

2 0 1 6

2 0 1 7

2 0 1 8

2 0 1 9

2 0 2 0

2 0 2 1

2 0 2 2

2 0 2 3

2 0 2 4

2 0 2 5

2 0 2 6

2 0 2 7

2 0 2 8

2 0 2 9

2 0 3 0

2 0 3 1

2 0 3 2

2 0 3 3

2 0 3 4

2 0 3 5

CVG Passenger Aircraft Departures - Historical and Forecast1991 - 2035 (thousands)

International Passenger Departures Domestic Passenger Departures Dominant + LCC Departures

Multi-Carrier Departures Baseline Departures Departures - Regression Derivation

2007 MPU 2011 TAF

DRAFT for Discussion -5




Key Attributes of CVG in 2035• Cost-sensitive development which allows for expansion

of air service

– Timely rehab/replacement of assets/facilities

– Re-use of facility if functional & meets customer service goals

• High Customer Service – Close-in gates

– Adequately sized facilities

– Walk-able parking and rental car facility

• Emphasis and focus on local passengers

• Terminal area development preserves maximum

flexibility and opportunity for west commercial area



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 7/17Get here. Get there. Get home.

Summary of Requirements• Airside

– Gate count meets future demand, but facility condition and cost of

operation may drive replacement/rehab

– Terminal 3 passenger processing space adequate to meet passenger

demand - functionality/customer service also considered

• Landside – Parking demand exceeds future capacity / Close-in rental car facility

incorporated

– Some improvements required for roadway access/curb front changes

• Other

– Land use and west commercial development area will be evaluated in

next steps




Alternative A1 Features• Airside

– Reconstructs Concourse A

– Renovates Terminal 3 and Concourse B

– Removes portion of Conc. B but requires continued use of

tunnel for passengers and bags

• Landside

– Renovates T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with new

public parking, consolidated rental car facility (CONRAC) and

quick turn around area (QTA)

– Retains main terminal roads, but provides new rental

car/commercial vehicle access

• Balances capital with O&M costs



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 9/17Get here. Get there. Get home. 9

Alternative A1: 2035

DRAFT for Discussion



Alternative A2 Features• Airside

– Eliminates Conc. B with new & expanded Conc. A in new location

– Passengers use above-grade connection (optional), but have

increased walking distance to end of Concourse

–Good aircraft movement

• Landside

– Renovates & expands T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages

with new public parking, CONRAC and QTA

– Reconfigures main terminal roads and up-ramp to provide accessto terminal and rental car facility

• Higher capital costs, but reduces O&M



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 11/17Get here. Get there. Get home. 11

Alternative A2: 2035

2700’ long concourse

DRAFT for Discussion



Alternative E Features

• Airside

– Retains and renovates Conc. A & B, with portion of Conc. A

being demolished

• Landside – Renovates T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with

new public parking, CONRAC and QTA

– Retains main terminal roads, but provides new rental

car/commercial vehicle access

• Minimizes capital costs, but significant O&M and

renovation costs for older facilities



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 13/17Get here. Get there. Get home. DRAFT For Discussion 13

Alternative E: 2035



New “V” Alternative Features

• Sketched in workshops – layout to be refined

• Airside

– Shorter passenger walking distances

– Good aircraft circulation and access

– Allows customs to be relocated closer to terminal

• Landside

– Can pair with best landside alternative

• Higher capital, but reduces O&M




“V” Alternative


Pair with best landsidealternative

Two concourses

allow incremental expansion to meet

demand



Next Steps

•

Define the V Alternative in terms of layout, costs,phasing, and landside

• Address plan for short term: now through 2015

•Refine other terminal area alternatives based onfeedback from workshop

– Cost – both capital cost and O&M

– Phasing to minimize disruption, coordinate with

near-term facility demo, and reduce temporary

construction

– Evaluate in terms of goals and objectives



http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 17/17Get here Get there Get home

Next Steps Continued

•Develop coordinated CIP

• Plan remaining MPU elements• Airfield requirements

• Land development/land use

•West service area uses

• Schedule next set of workshops to:

– Review and evaluate terminal alternatives to select

preferred concept

– Review work on remaining MPU elements

• Complete financial plan, e-ALP, implementation plan

• Public Meetings


OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)

Documents

OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)