Get here. Get there. Get home. 1 Master Plan Study Update OKI Regional Planning Forum February 24, 2012
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 1/17
Get here. Get there. Get home. 1
Master Plan Study Update
OKI Regional Planning Forum
February 24, 2012
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 2/17
Get here. Get there. Get home.
Agenda
• Master Plan Process
• Forecast Review
•Terminal Area Alternatives Discussion
• Next Steps
2DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 3/17
Get here. Get there. Get home.
Forecast Discussion
• Baseline Forecast used for financial planning while
Multi-Carrier Forecast used for facility planning
• Planning Activity Levels (PALS) will be defined as
triggers for growth – Actual activity levels can be easily monitored and
compared to PALs to project when facilities may be
needed
– Activity levels are reached at different years in the variousforecasts
– Use of PALs allows flexibility to act as demand materializes
3DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 4/17
Get here. Get there. Get home.
Enplanements Forecast
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
1991 1998 2005 2012 2019 2026 2033
CVG Enplanements - Historical and Forecast1991 - 2035 (thousands)
Historical Originating Historical ConnectingDominant Carrier + LCC Enplanements Multi-Carrier EnplanementsHistorical Trend Enplanements Enplanements - Baseline Derivation2007 MPU 2011 TAF
Market stimulationincreases O&D trafficin near term
2007 MPU Forecast
DRAFT for Discussion 4
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 5/17
Get here. Get there. Get home.
Passenger Aircraft Departures
2007 MPU Forecast
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1 9 9 1
1 9 9 2
1 9 9 3
1 9 9 4
1 9 9 5
1 9 9 6
1 9 9 7
1 9 9 8
1 9 9 9
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 9
2 0 1 0
2 0 1 1
2 0 1 2
2 0 1 3
2 0 1 4
2 0 1 5
2 0 1 6
2 0 1 7
2 0 1 8
2 0 1 9
2 0 2 0
2 0 2 1
2 0 2 2
2 0 2 3
2 0 2 4
2 0 2 5
2 0 2 6
2 0 2 7
2 0 2 8
2 0 2 9
2 0 3 0
2 0 3 1
2 0 3 2
2 0 3 3
2 0 3 4
2 0 3 5
CVG Passenger Aircraft Departures - Historical and Forecast1991 - 2035 (thousands)
International Passenger Departures Domestic Passenger Departures Dominant + LCC Departures
Multi-Carrier Departures Baseline Departures Departures - Regression Derivation
2007 MPU 2011 TAF
DRAFT for Discussion -5
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 6/17
Get here. Get there. Get home.
Key Attributes of CVG in 2035• Cost-sensitive development which allows for expansion
of air service
– Timely rehab/replacement of assets/facilities
– Re-use of facility if functional & meets customer service goals
• High Customer Service – Close-in gates
– Adequately sized facilities
– Walk-able parking and rental car facility
• Emphasis and focus on local passengers
• Terminal area development preserves maximum
flexibility and opportunity for west commercial area
6DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 7/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
Summary of Requirements• Airside
– Gate count meets future demand, but facility condition and cost of
operation may drive replacement/rehab
– Terminal 3 passenger processing space adequate to meet passenger
demand - functionality/customer service also considered
• Landside – Parking demand exceeds future capacity / Close-in rental car facility
incorporated
– Some improvements required for roadway access/curb front changes
• Other
– Land use and west commercial development area will be evaluated in
next steps
7DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 8/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
Alternative A1 Features• Airside
– Reconstructs Concourse A
– Renovates Terminal 3 and Concourse B
– Removes portion of Conc. B but requires continued use of
tunnel for passengers and bags
• Landside
– Renovates T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with new
public parking, consolidated rental car facility (CONRAC) and
quick turn around area (QTA)
– Retains main terminal roads, but provides new rental
car/commercial vehicle access
• Balances capital with O&M costs
8DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 9/17Get here. Get there. Get home. 9
Alternative A1: 2035
DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 10/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
Alternative A2 Features• Airside
– Eliminates Conc. B with new & expanded Conc. A in new location
– Passengers use above-grade connection (optional), but have
increased walking distance to end of Concourse
–Good aircraft movement
• Landside
– Renovates & expands T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages
with new public parking, CONRAC and QTA
– Reconfigures main terminal roads and up-ramp to provide accessto terminal and rental car facility
• Higher capital costs, but reduces O&M
10DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 11/17Get here. Get there. Get home. 11
Alternative A2: 2035
2700’ long concourse
DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 12/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
Alternative E Features
• Airside
– Retains and renovates Conc. A & B, with portion of Conc. A
being demolished
• Landside – Renovates T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with
new public parking, CONRAC and QTA
– Retains main terminal roads, but provides new rental
car/commercial vehicle access
• Minimizes capital costs, but significant O&M and
renovation costs for older facilities
12DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 13/17Get here. Get there. Get home. DRAFT For Discussion 13
Alternative E: 2035
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 14/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
New “V” Alternative Features
• Sketched in workshops – layout to be refined
• Airside
– Shorter passenger walking distances
– Good aircraft circulation and access
– Allows customs to be relocated closer to terminal
• Landside
– Can pair with best landside alternative
• Higher capital, but reduces O&M
14DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 15/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
“V” Alternative
15DRAFT for Discussion
Pair with best landsidealternative
Two concourses
allow incremental expansion to meet
demand
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 16/17Get here. Get there. Get home.
Next Steps
•
Define the V Alternative in terms of layout, costs,phasing, and landside
• Address plan for short term: now through 2015
•Refine other terminal area alternatives based onfeedback from workshop
– Cost – both capital cost and O&M
– Phasing to minimize disruption, coordinate with
near-term facility demo, and reduce temporary
construction
– Evaluate in terms of goals and objectives
16DRAFT for Discussion
8/3/2019 OKImasterplanstudyupdatefinal (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/okimasterplanstudyupdatefinal-2 17/17Get here Get there Get home
Next Steps Continued
•Develop coordinated CIP
• Plan remaining MPU elements• Airfield requirements
• Land development/land use
•West service area uses
• Schedule next set of workshops to:
– Review and evaluate terminal alternatives to select
preferred concept
– Review work on remaining MPU elements
• Complete financial plan, e-ALP, implementation plan
• Public Meetings
17DRAFT for Discussion