1
FuelMoisture,SeasonalSeverityandFireGrowthAnalysisintheUSFireBehaviorAnalysisTools:UsingFireWeatherIndex(FWI)CodesandIndicesasGuidesinAlaska
1 IntroductionEffortstoconduct,interpret,andapplyfindingsfromfiregrowthanalysisusingtheWildlandFireDecisionSupportSystem(WFDSS)andInteragencyFuelTreatmentDecisionSupportSystem(IFTDSS)toolsareheavilydependentonweatherobservationsandforecastsfromlocalweatherstationsandlandscapefuelclassificationsfromLANDFIRE.
Additionally,analystsapplyaconsiderablenumberofsubjectiveinputstotheiranalyses,suchasInitialFuelMoisturevaluesforliveanddeadfuels,bestweatherstationtouseforwindandfuelmoistureassessments,crownfirepotentialandmanifestation,andspottingfrequency.
Thetypicalapproachutilizedbyanalystswheninitializingtheirfirstanalysesistousedefaultinputsasmuchaspossibleand“calibrate”themodeltoknowfiregrowthevents.Thismethodcanbetimeconsuming,assumesthatthefirehasalreadyexperiencedoneormoresignificantgrowthevents,andsometimesleadsanalyststoadjustfactorsthatmaynotberesponsibleforchangesobservedontheground.
ThisguideoffersrecommendationsforusingCanadianForestFireDangerRatingSystem(CFFDRS)fuelmoisturecodesandfirebehaviorindicesfromtheFireWeatherIndex(FWI)systemtoprovideobjectiveguidanceforinitialsettingsformanyoftheseanalysisinputs.TheFWIsystemhasbeenformallycalibratedfornorthernborealecosystemsandeffectivelyidentifiessignificantthresholdsfortheAlaskalandscapesaswellasimportanttrendsinchangingfiregrowthpotential.
TheprimarytoolsconsideredhereincludeWFDSSandIFTDSSanalyses.IncludedareShort-termFireBehavior(STFB)thatisbasedontheFLAMMAPfiregrowthmodelingsystem,Near-TermFireBehavior(NTFB)basedontheFARSITEfiregrowthmodelingsystem,andFireSpreadProbability(FSPro)basedonFLAMMAPandNFDRSinputsusingFireFamilyPluswithinWFDSS.IFTDSSusesprimarilyFLAMMAPtoolsforitsfiregrowthanalyses.
Allanalysesusefuelmoisturescenariosincluding1hr,10hr,100hr,Woody,andHerbaceousfuelmoistures.Analystsareencouragedtoeditthesesettingsingeneral,orforspecificfuelclasses.FSProutilizeswindclimatologyfromaselectedweatherobservinglocationandallowstheusertomakebothcoarseandfineadjustmentstothatdistribution.FSProisheavilydependentontheEnergyReleaseComponentforfuelmodelG(ERCg)toidentifydailyfuelmoistureandspottingscenariosforbothdeterministic(forecast)andprobabilistic(climatology)portionsoftheanalysis.AnalystsarefindingthattheyneedtoedittheERCclassesandstreamsheavilytoreflectexpectedconditions.Attheveryleast,thesedailyFWIfuelmoisturecodesandfirebehaviorindicesareausefulcross-referenceswhenconsideringanalysisinputsandoutputs.
Therearetwosectionsthatfollow.
• ThefirstisadiscussionoftheFWIfuelmoisturecodes,theirfuelmoistureequivalents,andhowtheycanbeusedtofacilitateeditstofuelmoisturescenariossothattheyreflectcurrentobservedconditions.
• ThesecondshowshowBuildupIndex(BUI)andFineFuelMoistureCode(FFMC)canbeusedtoinformERCClassTablesandStreamstoreflectcurrentseasonseverityandfacilitatelocal“burndays”climatologytotheanalysis.
2
2 FuelMoistureInputsandFWIFuelMoistureCodes2.1 FineDead(1-hour)FuelMoistures
Whilelivefuelmoistures(WoodyandHerbaceous)havelargeimpactsonthefirespreadmodels,theyarefixedoverthedurationofbothWFDSSandIFTDSSanalyses.Themostvariablefuelmoistureinputisthe1-hourfuelmoisture.WFDSSSTFBandNTFBusehourlyweatherdataaswellasslope,aspect,andshadingfactorsto“condition”1-hour(and10-hour)fuelmoisturevaluesfrominitialsettings.
Thisdiurnalplotoffinedeadfuelmoistureillustratestheeffectofhourlyweather.IncludedaretheoriginalFosberg(1971)model(1h)inblue,the-Nelson(2000)model(1h)ingreen,andtheWotton(2009)GrassFuelMoisture(GFM%)inorange.Noticethatboth1h-NelsonandGFM%showgreaterresponsivenesstoovernightrecoveryandprecipitationevents.However,the1h-Nelsonestimatereflectsa2-4%increaseintheestimateduringthedryburnperiods.
AssumingtheGFM%estimateismorecompatiblewithexistingfirespreadmodelsandmoreresponsivetoday-to-dayvariationresponsibleforchangingfirespread,theanalystcouldconsideradjustingthe1-hourfuelmoistureestimatebasedononlineevaluationsorthistable.
KeepinmindthatNTFBusesconditioned1-&10-hourfuelmoisturesthroughouttheanalysis.ConsiderusingSTFBwherepossibleandsetting“conditioning”daysto0.
3
2.2 10-hourFuelMoisture
Whilethe10-hourFuelMoistureexertslessinfluenceontheRothermelFireSpreadmodeloutputs,itisestimatedforeachanalysisandisalsosubjecttotheinfluenceoftheNelsonDeadFuelMoisturemodel’stendencytoraisemoistureestimates.
Inaddition,theFWIFineFuelMoistureCode(FFMC)isverylikea10-hourtimelagfuelmoisture,estimatedbyFWIdevelopersassomewherebetweena5-and16-hourtimelag.Thoughproducedasa“unitless”code,itiseasilyconvertedtoafuelmoisture,representinganestimateofshadedlitterfuelsunderforestcanopy.Assuch,itassumesthatslope,aspect,andvariationinshadingislesssignificantthanthedryingeffectsoftemperatureandhumidity.
Infact,while1-hourestimateswerediscussedabove,finedeadlitterfuelsandfeathermossfuelbedsundertheborealforestcanopymayrespondtoweatherconditionsmuchmorelikeFFMCandmaybeappropriatelysetequaltothe10-hourestimatedescribedhere.
ThisgraphandtabledepicttherelationshipbetweentheestimatedFFMCandprospective10-hourfuelmoistureequivalents.Onthegraph,thebluepointsreflecttheformulausedintheFWIsystemtoconvertbetweencodeandfuelmoisturecontent(%).10-hourfuelmoisturesderivedinthiswayrepresentshadedforestlitterdeadfuelmoisture.Inthetableandonthegraph,inorangeistheconversionbetweenmeasurementsoffuelmoistureunshadedNFDRS“sticks”.
4
2.3 SlowlyRespondingFuelMoisturesWFDSSandIFTDSSanalysesbothincludeawiderangeoffuelmoistureestimatesthatrespondmoreslowlyoverweeksandmonthsduringthefireseason.100-hourand1000-hourfuelmoisturesrangefroma4-to40-daytimelaginheavierdeadfuels.Livefuelmoistures,herbaceousandwoody,areusedtoaccountfortheinfluenceoflushgreenvegetationasaheatsinkinthefireenvironment.
Currently,thereislittleobserveddatatoinformtheinputsforfuelmoistureandflammabilityconditionsfortheselivefuelsfoundinAlaska.Despitethis,manyanalystsusetheseinputsastheirprimarytoolincalibratingfiregrowthmodelsagainstobservedfirespread.
TheFWIDuffMoistureCode(DMC),a“unitless”indexofanassumedintermediate“timelag”fuelmoisture,takesadifferentapproach.Itintegratesfuelmoistureconditionsacrossthisbroadrangeofavailablefuelcharacteristics(otherthanfinedeadfuels)andrepresentsavailabilityandflammabilityinthoseclassesmoregenerally.Ithasbeencalibratedtodryinginthedufflayerbelowlitterontheforestfloor.
ThisgraphdepictstherelationshipbetweenthedailyestimateofDMCanditsequivalentdufffuelmoisture,inpercent.Further,itdepictsaconversiontofuelmoistureestimatesofanabove-grounddeadfuelofapproximately5”diameter.DMCestimatesareavailablefornearly200weatherobservinglocationsacrossAlaska.Theserepresentobjectivecharacterizationsthatcanbeusedtoadjustandapplyfuelmoistureinputsforanalysispurposes.
OnlytherelationshipbetweenDMCanditsequivalentdufffuelmoisture%hasbeenrigorouslyevaluated.Recommendationsforestimating100-hrandHerbaceousfuelmoisturecanbeappliedforanalysispurposes,butshouldbeevaluatedcritically.FeedbackconcerningthesemethodsshouldbedirectedtotheAlaskaWildfireCoordinatingGroup’s(AWFCG)FireModelingandAnalysisCommittee(FMAC)ortheAlaskaFireScienceConsortium(AFSC).
5
2.3.1 100-hourFuelMoistureInthegraphabove,DMCcanbeconvertedtoadufffuelmoistureequivalentthatrepresentsa360hourtimelagtrend.Thisshouldbeintermediatebetween100-hourand1000-hrtimelags.
Thisexampleseasonplotfrom2015attheHogatzaRAWSdemonstratestrendsforthesethreefuelmoistures.TheDMCEquivalent“duff”fuelmoisturewasrescaledtooverlaythe100-hourand1000-hourtrends.TheDMCmoisturetrendis,infact,intermediatebetweenthe100-and1000-hrtrends,representinga360hrtimelagfuelmoisturetrend.
Usingthe360-hourfuelmoistureestimatedfromtheDMCconversiongraphabove,the100-hourand1000-hrfuelmoisturescanbeestimatedasslightlylowerandhigher.Inthisexample,onJuly6th,the100-hrcouldbeadjustedtobemoreliketheDMC’s360-hrestimate,between4and5%.
2.3.2 HerbaceousFuelMoistureHerbaceousfuelmoisturehasbecomeacriticalinputforfiregrowthanalysisinWFDSSandIFTDSS.Butinsteadoffaithfullyobtainingandusingestimatesofmoisturecontent,thisinputisusedasacalibrationtoolforadjustmentoffirespreadestimatesinthoseanalyses.Itworksprincipallybytriggeringafuelloadtransferbetweenherbaceousloadsandfinedeadloadsformanyofthefuelmodelscurrentlyused.Transferredloadswouldthentakeonthe1-hrfuelmoistureestimate.However,alongwithwoodyfuelmoisture,theseloadsandtheirelevatedfuelmoisturesalsoimposeimportantheatsinksduringthegrowingseason,mutingsimulatedfirespreadwithinthemodels.
Despitelittleobservationdatatosupportinputvaluesinmanycases,herbaceousfuelmoistureestimatesusedinanalysescanhavealargeinfluenceonresults.Andoncethevalueisset,itsinfluenceisfixedforthedurationofthatanalysis.Assumingthattheherbaceousfuelmoisturewillremainfixedovera1-14-dayanalysisdurationmaybeaccurateorproblematic;wecannotbesure.Evenso,makinglargeadjustmentsinthisvaluetocalibratetoaknowngrowtheventmaynoteffectivelyrepresentthefactorsresponsibleforday-to-dayvariationinfuelavailabilityandflammabilitywithinthemodels.Modeledspreadcalibratedtoobservedfirespreadbasedprimarilyonsensitivitytolivefuelmoistureestimateswillproduceinconsistentresultswhentheassumptionsareappliedtoforecastconditions.
ThemethodsdescribedhereassumethattheDMCequivalentduffmoisture%isagoodproxyforgrowingseasonherbaceousfuelmoistureinputsresponsibleforguidingfuelloadtransfersandestimatingheatsinkfactorsforanalyses.ThiswouldallowanalyststoevaluatecurrentDMCvaluesinthefirearea,viewDMCforecasttrends,andobjectivelyapplyherbaceousfuelmoistureinputs.
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
DMCEq
uivalentFu
elM
oisture,%
Dead
FuelM
oisture,%
DMCEquivalent&DeadFuelMoisture2015Hogatza(AK)RAWS
100h 1000h DMC%
6
UsingtheDMCtofuelmoistureequivalentconversiononpage4,currentand/orforecastDMCsinthefireareacanbeconvertedtoDMCequivalentfuelmoistureforusedirectly(orasaguide)fortheherbaceousfuelmoistureinputtothefiresimulationanalysis.
Intheexampleplotshownhere,DMCequivalentfuelmoisturesbasedonweatherinputsfromtheHogatzaRAWSin2015arecomparedtoLFI-basedand1000-hrbasedherbaceousfuelmoistureestimates.
First,DMCequivalentfuelmoisturescannotbeusedtoestimatepre-greenandcuring/curedstatesinthefall.Theseareasareshadedoutonthegraph.Inthosecases,estimatesofherbaceousfuelmoistureshouldreflectcuring/curedconditions.
FromJune8ththroughJuly6th,DMCequivalentfuelmoistureestimatesfellfromahighof200%to45%.Estimates,suggestedonthegraphrangingfrom45%to75%duringthe15daysbeginningJune22nd,wouldimposesignificantfuelloadtransfersandenhancefirebehaviorpredictionspreciselywhendryfuelconditionswassupportingextremefiregrowthevents.ThroughthemiddleofJuly,therewasalullinsignificantfireeventsinthisareaandDMCfuelmoistureestimateswerebetween90%and130%,reducingandeliminatingfuelloadtransfersandincreasingtheheatsinklivefuelsprovide.ForseveraldaysinearlyAugust,firesintheHughesareabecameactiveandmadeseveralsignificantruns.DMCfuelmoistureestimatesduringthisperiodwouldhavebeenbetween50%and60%.
NoneofthissuggestthatthisisthephenologicaltrendofmoisturecontentinherbaceousfuelsduringthegrowingseasoninAlaska.Butitwouldbedifficulttoobtainsatisfactorysimulationsusingherbaceousfuelmoisturesbetween135%and240%asestimatedbytheLFIbasedmoisturemodel.Infact,mostanalystsheavilyeditthelivefuelmoisturesformostoftheiranalysesduringthegrowingseason.
2.4 FuelMoistureClimatologyforFSPro1-hr 10-hr 100-hr Herbaceous Woody
ERCgclimatologytendstomutetheobservedvariationinfinefuelmoisture.considerlowering1-hrintoptwobins,possiblyto3%or
4%.
Notalargefactorin
spreadmodel.ConsiderFFMCclimatologyasadefault(6-7%,8%,9%,12%,15%.
Again,generallysmallinfluence.
DMCclimatologysuggests
defaultsof6%,7%,8%,12%,and17%.
UsecurrentDMCestimateandforecast/outlooktosuggestrangeofDMCvaluesexpectedover
analysisperiod.UsefuelmoistureconversionandspreadrangeoverERC
classes.
ReviewNFMDrecordsforBlackSpruceneedle
moisture,generally<100%.Othersshrubsgenerallyhigherduring
growingseason.
Pre-Green Curing/CuredGrowingSeason
7
3 FireSeasonSeverityandFSProERCClassesandStreams3.1 EnergyReleaseComponent(ERC)andBuildupIndex(BUI)asSeasonIndicators
Totheleft,thesethreefiredangerratingsgraphsfromWFDSSdepictannualERCgclimatologyforobservinglocationsinthewestern,centralandeasterninterior.Alongwiththese,thesingleBUIseasongraphbelowshowsclimatologyforalltheinteriorwithmedianweeklyMODISdetectionsrepresentingareaburnedduringtheseason.Graydashedlineshighlightthedivisionsbetweenthefire“seasons”(Wind-Driven,DuffDriven,DroughtDriven,DiurnalStage)onallfourgraphs.TheprecisedatesofthedivisionsvaryfromseasontoseasonandarelessimportantthantheERCandBUItrendsthrougheachoftheseseasons.
TheMODISdetectionsconfirmthattheBUItrendscorrectlyrepresentthe“DuffDriven”and“DroughtDriven”seasonsaspeakseasons.Thereislesseroverallareaburnedinthe“WindDriven”and“DiurnalStage”shoulderseasons.
ThecorrespondingERCgseasonaltrendsunder-representseasonalpotentialforthe“DuffDriven”and“DroughtDriven”seasons,withtheaverage(gray)trendpeakingveryearlyinthe“WindDriven”shoulderseasonandshowingsteadydeclinethroughoutthepeakseasons.Thisskewedrepresentationofseasonaltrendistheresultofthefuelloadtransfersfromtheherbaceouscategorytofinedeadfuelsduringtheearly,pre-greenperiodandthelargeheatsinkprovidedbyelevatedherbaceousandwoodyfuelmoisturesduringthegrowingseason.Whilethismodeledheatsinkcharacterizationworkswellformanylandscapes,itinaccuratelydiminishespotentialduringthesepeakseasonsinnorthernconiferforests.
WindDriven
DuffDriven
DroughtDriven
DiurnalStage
8
ERCgperformsseveralcriticalfunctionsintheFSProanalysis.First,asadefault,itprovidesafrequencydistributionof5fuelmoistureandfirebehaviorscenariosbasedonitswholeseasonclimatology.Second,that climatologyprovidesday-to-daystreamsofthosefuelmoistureandfirebehaviorscenariostomodelfirespreadprobabilitiesweeksintothefuture.TheprocessexplainedbelowwilldemonstratehowknowledgeofobservedFWIelementscaninformadjustmentstoboththefrequencydistributionandtheERCgstreamsusedinthoseanalyses.
3.2 EditingtheERCStreamtoReflectFFMCandBUITrendsInFSProanalysis,theERCStreamisdisplayedasasequenceofdaysintherecentpastandtheestimatedERCgvaluesforthosedays.Aforecaststream,basedontheNationalDigitalForecastDatabase(NDFD)weatherforecast,canbeincluded.Andafterthosedays,climatologyapproachingtheaverageERCgtrendprovidesarangeofERCsequencesfurtherintothefuturefortheanalysisperiod.
Inthisexample,withtheminimumburnableERCgvalueat38,alloftheobservedandforecastERCstreamfallsbelowthatthreshold.Giventhat,themapshowstheresult,withaverylowprobabilityofanysignificantfirespread.Thatmaybecorrectinthiscase,butwithERCgexaggeratingtheinfluenceoflivefuels,itmaybeaseriousunderestimate.
AccuratelyportrayingtheobservedandforecastERCstreamarecriticaltotheaccuracyofFSProoutput.ItispossibletouseFFMCandBUIfromtheFWIsystemtoadjusttheERCstreamwhenpreparinginitialanalyses.ThetabletotheleftshowsFFMCandBUIclassesandsuggestshowtheyarecombinedtoidentifywhereintheERCfrequencydistributioneachdayfalls.
AnalystsshouldevaluateERCvaluesusingFFMCandBUIvaluesobservedfromrepresentativelocalweatherstationsandfindthecellthatrepresentsthatcombinationofvalues.ERCglevelscanbederivedfromtheclasslevelthetablesuggests.
Forexample,iftheFFMCis91andtheBUIis80,thecombinationsuggeststhattheERCvalueshouldbeinthethirdERCClass,withavaluebetween49and53.Because91and80arebothintermediatewithintheirclasses,theERCmightbebestrepresentedas51or52.ConsiderestimatingERCvaluesforupto3daysintheobservedERCstreamandalltheforecastedERCvaluesbeforeconductingtheinitialFSProanalysis.
9
3.3 EvaluatingandEditingERCClassTableusing“BurnDays”ClimatologyTocontinuewiththeexampleabove,thisERCClassBurnDaysSummaryshowstheresult.ERCClimatologywiththedefaultERCstreamproducedonlyabout300burnabledaysamong7000totaldays,lessthan5%.Thatamountstooneburndayin3weeks.Thesedaysallcameinthelowesttwoclassesrepresentingmoderatedburningconditions.Infact,therearefrequentinstancesinthehistoricrecordwheredryingconditionsaroundactivefiresincreasedtheriskofspreadinmuchlessthantwoweeks.
ThoughfirespreadpotentialinboreallandscapesmaynotrespondastheERCgsuggestsduringthepeakseasons,thereisanobservedepisodiccharactertofirespreadwithfireslyingdormantfordaysandthengrowingaggressivelyafterashorttransition.Thissuggestsaninfluenceoftheheatsinkinlivefuels.
Thisgraphic,basedonanalysisofFFMCandBUItrendsincombinationwithconcurrentobservedMODISdetectionshighlightsanaveragefrequencyofburndaysunderarangeoffireseasons.Overall,itsuggests1-2daysofactivespreadpotentialperweek,or15-30%ofalldaysinananalysisperiodforpeakseason.Formoreactiveseasons,thatpercentagemayriseto40%(3days)ormoreoverall.
WithverifiedERCStreams,initialFSProanalysesforagivenstartdateanddurationwillsuggestadistributionofburndaysproducedbytheclimatology.Theanalystshouldreviewthatfrequencydistributionandmakeeditstoreflecttheclimatologydemonstratedhereandtheforecastandoutlookguidanceavailable.Methodologiesaresuggestedbelow.
10
3.3.1 DuffDrivenSeason:TooManyBurnDaysInthiscommonexampleduringthepeakseasonsurroundingthesummersolstice,ERCglevelisonlybeginningtofallfromitspre-greenpeaklevels.Overall,theanalysisassumedthat82%ofalldayswereburndays,nearly6daysaweekoverall.Thereislittleevidencetosupportthisfrequencyofsignificantgrowtheveninextremeseasons.Theremaybeindividualperiodswith6-7dayswithdailysignificantspread,butnothingthatsuggestthatforanoverallaverage.
AdjustmentsintheERCstreammayalterthisdistributionofburndayssignificantly,butassumethatthestreamhasalreadybeeneditedasrecommendedabove.ReducingthefrequencyofburndayscanbeaccomplishedeasilybyreducingthenumberofERCclasses.Inthiscase,eliminatingthelowertwoclassesreducedthefrequencyfrom77%to47%.This,ineffect,ismodelingtheresistancefromtheheatsinkinlivefuels.
3.3.2 DroughtDrivenSeason:NotEnoughBurnDays
ThiscorrespondingexamplefromlaterintheseasonhighlightsthedifficultyERCghasinrepresentingfuelavailabilityandflammabilityatthattime.CurrentERCglevelsarewellbelowburndaythresholds,andtheanalysiswillproduceveryfewactiveburndaysasaresult.Giventheguidanceforburndayclimatologyabove,itwouldbeprudenttosuggestatleast15%burndaysover2weeks.Infact,ifasignificantdryingtrendisforecast,frequencyof30-40%maybeanappropriatefrequency.
Addinga6thERCClasswillproduceadditionalburndays.Butifthatisinsufficient,editingtheERCStreamevenfurthermaybenecessary.
11
4 ConclusionTheserecommendationsarepreparedspecificallyforspatialanalysisinAlaska,withemphasisonitsboreallandscapes.TheremaybesufficientapplicabilityintheWesternGreatLakesForestofMichigan,Minnesota,andWisconsintoconsidersimilarapproaches.Theseguidelinesarebasedonfirepotentialreflectedduringthegrowingseasoninnorthernforestswithsignificantlivefueladmixturesbothonthesurfaceandinthecanopy.TheydonothaveapplicabilityforcuringandcuredfuelbedsthatrepresentpeakseasonconditionsthroughoutmuchofthewesternUS.
Thegoaloftheserecommendationsistoemphasizerealobservedconditionsasinputstothemodel,toidentifywhereinthemodelsrealvariationsoffirebehaviorandfirespreadphenomenonarebestreflected,andtominimizetheneedforusingcalibratingfactorsthatmaynotreflectthemostfrequentlychangingfactorsthatdriveday-to-dayvariationinfirebehavior.ManyoftherecommendationsincludeuseofCFFDRSFireWeatherIndexsystemcodesandindices.Recent,current,andforecastvaluesandtrendscanbeexploredathttp://akff.mesowest.org.Upto3forecastdaysarenowavailableforuse.
Further,thisapproachassumesthatnearlyallsignificantgrowthoccursonfewerdayswithmoreflammableconditionsthatencouragefirestoovercometheheatsinkofthelivefuels.UsingthisapproachtoreducethefrequencyofburndaysinFSProandreduceoreliminateindividualburndaysinERCstreamsorinNTFBsequencesrequiresaconcurrentcommitmenttomodelcrownfirepotentialintheconiferfuels,especiallyinBlackSpruce.Analystsusetwoapproachestoaccomplishthis:
• Earlierinthegrowingseasonwhenhardwoodandmixedwoodforestshavegreaterlivefuelheatsinkstodiscouragespread,crownfireinBlackSprucecanbeencouragedbyconvertingthestandardfuelmodels,tu3/163(timber/grass/shrub)and/ortu4/164(dwarfconifer)tosh5/145(chapparal).Fuelloadingsarecomparable,anditeffectivelymodelsindividualgrowtheventswithobservedenvironmentalinputs.
• Laterinthepeakseason(drought-driven),whenlivefuelsmaybemorestressedacrossthelandscape,hardwoodsandmixedwoodforestsmaybemoreavailableandflammablefuelbeds.Inthiscase,selectingtheScott&ReinhardtCrownFiremethodproducescrownfireacrossthewiderspectrumoffuelmodelsdistributedacrossthelandscape.Inthiscase,itmaybeunnecessarytoconverttu3/163and/ortu4/164fueldesignations.
• Asacaution,whenusingtu3/163andtu4/164torepresentblacksprucecommunitiesoravarietyofgrassandgrass/shrubmodelsfortundralandscapes,keepinmindthatmoistureofextinctionisaslowas12%.Undertheinfluenceoffuelmoistureconditioning,therewillbenumerousinstancesthatanalyseswillproduceelevated1hr-and10h-fuelmoisturesthatcomeunderthedampeninginfluenceofthatlowmoistureofextinction.ThisisespeciallyproblematicinNTFBwheretherearenosettingstomitigateitseffect.ThereissomefacilitytodothatinSTFBwheretheanalystcanselect0(zero)conditioningdaysandsimplyuseinitialfuelmoistureinputs.Thiscanproduceacceptableresultsforsurfacefuelsunderforestcanopyandinopenflattundra,whereconditioningfactorsareminimizedontheground.
Theserecommendationsshouldhelpproduceeffectiveanalysesearlyinanincidentwithoutanysignificantcalibration.However,asthefiredevelopsahistoryofgrowthevents,perceivablevariabilityinweatherinfluences,andanaccumulationoffirelineobservationsitisappropriatetocriticallyevaluatetheseguidelines.Yourexperienceusingthemandrecommendationsforchangesareimportant.ContacttheAlaskaWildfireCoordinatingGroup’s(AWFCG)FireModelingandAnalysisCommittee(FMAC)ortheAlaskaFireScienceConsortium(AFSC)iftherearecontributionstooffer.
12
5 ReferencesWildfireAssessmentWebsites:Maps/Imagery/GeospatialServices:https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/maps.phpWeather:https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/weather.phpFuels/FireDanger:https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/fuelfire.phpAirQuality:https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/airquality.phpOutlooks:https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/outlooks.phpFireWeatherIndex(FWI):http://akff.mesowest.orgNWSAlaskaFireWeather:http://w2.weather.gov/arh/fireNWSNationalFireWeather:http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ridge2/fire/AlaskaClimate:http://climate.gi.alaska.edu/NIFCFireEnterpriseGeospatialPortal(EGP):https://egp.nwcg.gov/egp/default.aspxWildlandFireDecisionSupportSystem:http://wfdss.usgs.govWildlandFireLibrary:https://firelibrary.org/
GuidesAlaskaFuelModelGuide(draftupdate,2016andoriginal,2008):https://www.frames.gov/files/9614/6482/3097/Revised_FuelModelGuide_Draft_May2016_Posted.pdfhttps://www.frames.gov/files/2814/3352/8200/Alaska_Fuel_Model_Guidebook_0620081.pdf
FSProAnalysisinAlaskahttps://www.frames.gov/documents/alaska/docs/FSProAnalysisAK_V1.1_Mar_2012.pdf
FieldGuidestoCFFDRSFireWeatherIndex(FWI)andFireBehaviorPrediction(FBP)Systems:https://www.frames.gov/files/3014/2309/6588/AK_FireWeatherIndex_FieldGuide_2015.pdfhttps://www.frames.gov/files/6914/2309/6585/AK_FireBehaviorPrediction_FieldGuide_2015.pdf
FireEndingEventWorkshop:https://www.frames.gov/files/1513/8749/6485/AWFCG_2008_Fire_Ending_Event_Workshop.pdf
HowtodownloadAKfireperimetersfromAICChttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byauxp0C04_femRBVERlWlF6SHc/view?usp=sharing
AnalysisNamingConventioninAnalystinfofolderhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byauxp0C04_fZGJ4d1Rfa2JsLXc/view?usp=sharing
OtherWebResourcesAlaskaFireScienceConsortiumFireModelingResources: https://www.frames.gov/partner-sites/afsc/partner-groups/fire-behavior-modeling-group/
CFFDRSYouTubeLearningResources:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLriyD21WeCtKRA2TsWwrInsRmuC0j86HG
GrowingSeasonIndexandLiveFuelMoisture: https://www.wfas.net/index.php/growing-season-index-experimental-products-96
AlaskaFireModelingWorkshop(2012): https://www.wfas.net/index.php/growing-season-index-experimental-products-96
13
KMLs:ActiveFireMappingKMLBundle:https://fsapps.nwcg.gov/afm/data/kml/alaska_latest_AFM_bundle.kml
AICCActiveFireBundle:https://afsmaps.blm.gov/imf/sites/help/AlaskaWildfires.kml
AvenzaMapsProductsAFSPDFMaps:https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/geopdf.php
DOFPDFMaps:https://sites.google.com/site/alaskafiremaps/home
Reports,PresentationsandPublicationsCarlson,J.D.et.al.2007.ApplicationoftheNelsonmodeltofourtimelagfuelclassesusingOklahomafieldobservations:modelevaluationandcomparisonwithNationalFireDangerRatingSystemalgorithms.InternationalJournalofWildlandFire,2007,16,204–216 Fosberg,M.A.,andJ.E.Deeming.1971.Derivationofthe1-and10-hourtimelagfuelmoisturecalculationsforfire-dangerrating.ResearchNoteRM-207.FortCollins,CO,USDAForestService,RockyMountainForestandRangeExperimentStation.
Jolly,WilliamM.,Nemani,R.andRunning,S.W.2005.Ageneralized,bioclimaticindextopredictfoliarphenologyinresponsetoclimate.GlobalChangeBiology11(4):619–632.
Kidnie,S.K.,Wotton,B.M.andDroog,W.N.2010.FieldguideforpredictingfirebehaviourinOntario'stallgrassprairie.ElginCountyStewardshipCouncilSpecialPublication.OntarioMinistryofNaturalResources,Aylmer,Ontario.65p.
Miller,EricA.2009.FireIndicesforFSProinAlaska:AcomparisonofERCandBUIonthe2009TitnaRiverFire(420).UnpublishedReport.
Nelson,RalphM,Jr.2000.Predictionofdiurnalchangein10-hfuelstickmoisturecontent.CanadianJournalofForestResearch30,1071–1087.doi:10.1139/CJFR-30-7-1071
WottonB.M.2009.AgrassmoisturemodelfortheCanadianForestFireDangerRatingSystem.Paper3-2inProceedings8thFireandForestMeteorologySymposium.Kalispell,MTOct13-15,2009
Ziel,Robert,Wolken,Jane,St.Clair,Thomas,andHenderson,Marsha.2015.ModelingFireGrowthPotentialByEmphasizingSignificantGrowthEvents:CharacterizingAClimatologyOfFireGrowthDaysInAlaska’sBorealForest.ExtendedAbstractforpresentationattheAMS11thSymposiumonFire&ForestMeteorology.May5th,2015(https://ams.confex.com/ams/11FIRE/webprogram/Paper272864.html).