Diffractive studies and forward physics at CMS
Marta Ruspa, Univ. Piemonte Orientale-Novara & INFN-Torino
XIV International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering
April 20-24, 2006, Tsukuba (Japan)
2
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
CMS detectors along beam line:Cal with || ≤ 3, HF with 3 ≤|| ≤ 5Castor calorimeter, behind T2 with 5.2 ≤|| ≤ 6.5Beam Scintillation counters BSCZero-degree calorimeter ZDC
Forward detectors at CMS
CMS IP T1/T2, Castor, BSC ZDC RPs@150m RPs@220m
420m
TOTEM detectors:T1 (CSC) in CMS endcapsT2 (GEM) in shielding behind HFT1 + T2: 3 ≤ || ≤ 6.8Roman pots with Si detectors on 2 sides at up to 220 m
Possible addition: FP420
Unprecedented rapidity coverage at a hadron collider
3
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Roman pot acceptance
High * (1540m) @ 1028 - 1029cm-2s-1 :
90% of all diffractive protons are seen in TOTEM RPs
Low * (0.5 m) - nominal LHC beam optics @ 1033 - 1034cm-2s-1: 220 m: 0.02 < < 0.2 420 m: 0.002 < < 0.02
Standard optics * = 0.5 m assumed from now on
TOTEM
FP420
see J. Whitmore’s talk
XL= 1 - : longitudinal momentum loss Unprecedented ξ coverage at a hadron collider
4
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
CMS/TOTEM diffractive physics program
TOTEM and CMS pursue a common diffractive and forward physics program to be described in a common document
A wealth of results already available [see HERA-LHC Workshop proceedings]
Thanks to TOTEM people and to all contributors!
The results presented in the following do not depend on the specific hardware implementation of the T1 and T2 detectors or of the roman pots; they hold for any tracker system with the T1, T2 rapidity coverage in conjunction with RPs at 220 m and 420 m from the IP.
5
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
The accessible physics is a function of the integrated
luminosity
2 gluon exchange with vacuum quantum numbers “Pomeron”
X
Double Pomeron exchange:
X
Single diffraction:
p p p X p p p X p
X
Y
Double diffraction:
p p X Y
6
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Low lumi Rapidity gap selection possibleHF, Castor, BSCs, T1, T2Proton tag selection optionalRPs at 220m and 420 m
Diffraction is about 1/4 of tot
High cross section processes“Soft” diffractionInteresting for start-up runningImportant for understanding pile-up
Low
lu
mi
Hig
h lu
mi
Map to diffractive/forward physics in CMS
7
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Number of pileup events per bunch crossing =
= Lumi* cross section * bunch time width * total lhc bunches / filled bunches =
= 1034 cm-2 s-1 * 104 (cm^2/m^2) * 10-28 (m2 / b) * 110 mb * 10-3 (b/mb) * 25 (ns) * 10-9 (s/ns) * 3564 / 2808 35
1x1032 0
1x1033 3.5
2x1033 7
Pile-up: numbers!
1 mb = 100 events/s @ 10 29 cm-2 s-1
PHOJET: ALL PROCESSES 110 mb NONDIF.INELASTIC 51 mb ELASTIC 33 mb DOUBLE POMERON 1.95 mb SINGLE DIFFR.(1) 7.66 mb SINGLE DIFFR.(2) 7.52 mb DOUBLE DIFFRACT. 9.3 mb
Number of pileup events per bunch crossing =
= Lumi* cross section * bunch time width * total lhc bunches / filled bunches =
= 1034 cm-2 s-1 * 104 (cm^2/m^2) * 10-28 (m2 / b) * 51 mb * 10-3 (b/mb) * 25 (ns) * 10-9 (s/ns) * 3564 / 2808 17
This number is valid in the central detector region, but must be corrected for the elastic and diffractive cross section in the forward region!
Selection of diffractive events with rapidity gap only possibleat luminosities below 10 33 cm-2s-1, where event pile-up is absent
8
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Low lumi Rapidity gap selection possibleHF, Castor, BSCs, T1, T2Proton tag selection optionalRPs at 220m and 420 m
Diffraction is about 1/4 of tot
High cross section processes“Soft” diffractionInteresting for start-up runningImportant for understanding pile-up
QCD: SD and DPE production of vector bosons, heavy quarks, high ET jets Diff PDFs and generalized PDFs Low-x structure of the proton High-density regime γ γ and γp interactions (QED)Forward energy flow - input to cosmics shower simulation
Low
lu
mi
Hig
h lu
mi
Map to diffractive/forward physics in CMS
9
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Low lumi Rapidity gap selection possibleHF, Castor, BSCs, T1, T2Proton tag selection optionalRPs at 220m and 420 m
Diffraction is about 1/4 of tot
High cross section processes“Soft” diffractionInteresting for start-up runningImportant for understanding pile-up
QCD: SD and DPE production of vector bosons, heavy quarks, high ET jets Diff PDFs and generalized PDFs Low-x structure of the proton High-density regime γ γ and γp interactions (QED)Forward energy flow - input to cosmics shower simulation
Low
lu
mi
Hig
h lu
mi
Map to diffractive/forward physics in CMS
High lumiNo Rapidity gap selection possibleProton tag selection indispensableRPs at 220 m and 420 m
Central exclusive productionDiscovery physics:Light SM HiggsMSSM Higgs
10
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Selection rules result in the central systembeing (to good approx) JPC = 0++
I.e. a particle produced with proton tagshas known quantum numbers
Excellent mass resolution (~GeV) from the protons, independent of the decay productsof the central system
CP violation in the Higgs sector manifestsitself as azimuthal asymmetry of the protons
Proton tagging may be the discovery channelin certain regions in the MSSM
Vacuum quantum numbers“Double Pomeron exchange”
shields color charge ofother two gluons
The physics interest of DPE Higgs production
As the delivered luminosity reaches tens of fb-1 the central exclusive production (CEP) processes become a tool to search for new physics
See B. Cox’s talk
11
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Vacuum quantum numbers“Double Pomeron exchange”
shields color charge ofother two gluons
The physics interest of DPE Higgs production
b jets : MH = 120 GeV · BR = 2 fb (uncertainty factor ~ 2.5)
MH = 140 GeV · = 0.7 fb
MH = 120 GeV : 11 signal / O(10) background in 30 fb-1
after detector cuts
WW* : MH = 120 GeV · BR = 0.4 fb
MH = 140 GeV · BR = 1 fb
MH = 140 GeV : 8 signal / O(3) background in 30 fb-
1
after detector cuts
b-jet channel very important in “intense coupling regime” of MSSM, cross section factor 10-20 larger, discovery channel?
See B. Cox’s talk
As the delivered luminosity reaches tens of fb-1 the central exclusive production (CEP) processes become a tool to search for new physics
12
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
1 2 s = M2
With √s = 14TeV, MH = 120 GeVon average:
0.009 1%
DPE Higgs production: necessary ingredients
Nominal LHC beam optics @ 1033 - 1034cm-2s-1: 220 m: 0.02 < < 0.2 420m: 0.002 < < 0.02
beam
p’
p’roman potsroman pots
dipoledipole
13
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Trigger studies
“Diffractive Higgs: CMS/TOTEM level-1 trigger studies”M. Arneodo, V. Avati, R. Croft, F. Ferro, M. Grothe, C. Hogg, F. Oljemark, K. Osterberg, M. RuspaProceedings of “ HERA and the LHC: A Workshop on theImplications of HERA for LHC Physics", CERN-DESY 2004/2005, p. 455-460;hep-ph/0601013
Semileptonic WW and tau tau decay channels
(or any final state with high-pT leptons, missing ET): trigger not a problem!
Most challenging case is H (120 GeV) bb
14
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
< 100 Hz < 100 kHz 40 MHz collision
High-Level Trigger HLTLevel-1 trigger
Calo Muon no tracking!
Triggering jets at CMS
ECAL
HCAL
PbWO4crystal veto
patterns
Trigger tower 4x4 trigger towers = region
Search for jets with a sliding 3x3 regions window Jet = 3x3 region with local energy max in middle Reconstructed L1 jet ET on average ~ 60% of real jet ET, thus need for jet ET calibration Jet = 144 trigger towers, with typical jet dimensions: Dh x Df = 1 x 1
15
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
L1 jet trigger signature for a 120 GeV Higgs: 2 jets in CMS Cal, ET < 60 GeV each
Measured L1 jet ET on average only ~60% of true jet ET
L1 trigger applies jet ET calibration and cuts on calibrated value Thus: 40 GeV (calibrated) ~ 20 to 25 GeV measured Cannot go much lower because of noise
The difficulty of triggering on a light Higgs
while considered acceptable: O(1Khz)
Need additional conditions in trigger
Use rate/efficiency @ L1 jet ET cutoff of 40 GeV as benchmark
16
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
+ HT condition = isolation condition for jets:
2 jets in central Cal (|η|< 2.5) with ∑(ET 2 jets)/HT > threshold
HT = scalar sum of ET of all jets in the event with ET(jet) > threshold factor 2 rate reduction
L1 2-jet trigger +…
17
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
+ HT condition = isolation condition for jets:
2 jets in central Cal (|η| < 2.5) with ∑(ET 2 jets)/HT > threshold
HT = scalar sum of ET of all jets in the event with ET(jet) > threshold factor 2 rate reduction
+ Conditions based on TOTEM detectors T1 e T2:• excellent suppression of QCD bacground• useless as soon as pile-up events are present as also signal events
are vetoed (non-diff. component in pile-up events tends to quickly fill in the rapidity gaps).
L1 2-jet trigger +…
18
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
+ HT condition = isolation condition for jets:
2 jets in central Cal (|η| < 2.5) with ∑(ET 2 jets)/HT > threshold
HT = scalar sum of ET of all jets in the event with ET(jet) > threshold factor 2 rate reduction
+ Conditions based on TOTEM detectors T1 e T2:• excellent suppression of QCD background• useless as soon as pile-up events are present as also signal events
are vetoed (non-diff. component in pile-up events tends to quickly fill in the rapidity gaps).
+ Topological condition: 2 jets required to be in the same η hemisphere as the RP detectors that
see tthe proton factor 2 rate reduction
L1 2-jet trigger +…
19
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
L1 2-jet trigger +…
+ Single-arm 220 m condition: mass resolution for CEP
Higgs is worst than with 420 m tag
Integrated QCD rate for events with at least two jets
Integrated QCD rate for events with at least two jets and which satisfy the single-arm 220 m RP condition
kH
zL=1032cm-
2s-1
Plot: Richard Croft
20
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
L1 2-jet trigger +…
+ Single-arm 220 m condition: very good reduction of rate in absence of pile-up reduction decreases substantially in the presence of pile-
up+ Single-arm 220 m condition with cut
TOTEM will provide implementation of a cut at L1 (e.g. < 0.1, recall acceptance is 0.02 < < 0.2). Implementation and achievable resolution under study..
Achievable total reduction: 10 x 2 (HT cond.) x 2 (topological cond.) = 40!
21
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
For H (120 GeV, DPE) b bbar, adding L1 conditions on the RPs at 220m is likely to provide a rate reduction sufficient to meet the CMS L1 bandwidth limits at luminosities up to 2x 1033 cm-1 s-1
To go even further up in luminosity need additional handle to stay within bandwidth limits
... So what about triggering with the 420 m RPs ?At the current CMS L1 latency of 3.2 s they are too far away from IP for inclusion in L1
Note: This is a hardware limit - cannot be changed without replacingtrigger pipelines of CMS tracker and preshower detectors with deeper onesShould this however happen (under discussion for SLHC: L1 latency 6.4 s,determined by ECAL pipeline depth) then ....
Triggering on a light Higgs
22
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
L1 2-jet trigger +…
Achievable total reduction: 75 x 2 (HT cond.) x 2 (topological cond.) = 300!
+ Asymmetric 220 & 420 condition: in effect means on opposite sides events where values of 2
protons are very different can be used either in L1 after increase in L1 latency or on
HLT!
23
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
L1 efficiency – RP conditionHow much is left of our signal?
Without RP condition Various RP conditions
Plots: Richard Croft
24
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
H bb (120 GeV): relatively muon-rich final state from B-decays - about 20% of events have at least one muon in the final state
How many signal events are being retained by the already foreseen CMS trigger streams, notably the muon trigger?
L1 signal efficiency – muon condition
Half of events with a muon in the final state can be triggered with aa 1 muon + 1 jet trigger (to be implemented)
H WW(140 GeV): about 23% of events have at least one muon in the final state:
70% of events with CMS L1 single muon trigger
Numbers: F. Oljemark
25
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Single diffractive production of W, Z, dijets
DPE processes constitute only a small part of the diffractive cross section that can be explored by CMS and TOTEM. Exemplary of any process that deposits low ET in the central detector.
26
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Recall: • RP acceptances at * = 0.5 m:
220m - 0.02 < < 0.2 420m – 0.002 < < 0.02
• Lowest threshold for L1 jet trigger is ET > 40 GeV• Typical loss of factor 2 in efficiency when using 220 m RP cond. (RP acceptance)
Map the parameter space (bandwidth vs efficiency) with ultimate goal of defining a trigger table for a dedicated diffractive trigger stream with target output rates of 1 kHz (L1) and 1 Hz (HLT)
Use POMWIG Monte Carlo
Single diffractive production of W, Z, dijets
Plot: Richard Croft
27
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
At LHC startup, where the luminosity will be low, and where no pile-up is present, CMS can pursue a rich program of rapidity-gap based diffractive and fwd physics
Should the FP420 R&D project result in upgrading CMS with detectors 420 m away from the IP, proton-tag based program and discovery physics becomes possible
Wide proton-tag based program ranging from QCD to the low-x structure of the proton to photon physics already possible by way of a collaboration of CMS with TOTEM
Summary
Key element is trigger, notably at high lumi, when amount of pile-up collisions overlaid to the interesting hard event becomes high. Pile-up events are themselves largely diffractive
28
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Triggering in absence of pile-up: no problem.
L1 2-jet rate for central with L1 jet ET cutoff of 40 GeV must be reduced to O(1Khz) to accomplish with CMS L1 bandwith restrictions. Therefore using L1 jet trigger alone not an option in the presence of pile-up.
Can trigger with the central detector alone by using the muon trigger Efficiencies with already foreseen CMS L1 thresholds: 10% for H(120GeV) bb, 20% for H(140GeV) WW*
Can also use the L1 jet trigger when combining it with RP condition at (rate of a few kHz achievable at 2x1033 cm-1s-1).
Requires defining a new CMS trigger stream; efficiencies around 10%.
L1 efficiencies for SD production of W’s, Z’s, die-jets available.
A dedicated trigger stream hence feasible, with output rates of O(1) kHz
L1, efficient for selecting CEP, a potential discovery channel for a light
Higgs boson, and hard single diffractive processes.
Triggering diffraction at CMS: summary
29
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
BACKUP
30
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Beam-halo/beam-gas level numbers produced by TOTEM not a problem as soon as central CMS detector condition is used in L1
Find from PYTHIA pile-up sample:
@220m: 0.012 protons per pile-up event on average, i.e.
at 1034 cm-2s-1: 35*0.055=1.93
@220m: In worst case on average 1.93 tracks from pile-up in addition to track from signal event
@420m: 0.055 protons per pile-up event on average, i.e.
at 1034 cm-2s-1: 35*0.012=0.42
@420m: In worst case on average 0.42 tracks from pile-up in addition to track from signal event
Background in RPs
The reduction factors in the presence of pile-up obtained by scaling the probability per pile-up event to satisfy the relevant RP condition, determined separately, by the average number of pile-up events at the luminosity in question.
31
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
No problem for processes with a lepton in the final state
H (120 GeV) bbbar For luminosities up to 2x1033 cm-2s-1 possible to keep a
reasonable fraction of events At higher luminosities ~ 10% can always be kept by
triggering on muons
MSSM scenario: discovery can be made with lumi at or below 1x1033 cm-
2s-1
at higher luminosities triggering on muons from b-decay
32
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Other L1 conditions
Effect of combining aready foreseen L1 trigger conditions with conditions on the RP detectors
Large rapidity gap cut at L1 (jets veto in forward calorimeter) Further rate reduction (approx. factor 2) at lumi where pile-up is negligible
Estimated 1kHz Jet Thresholds for various Central / RP conditions
S: single-sided, D: double-sided
C: <0.1 of the leading proton
33
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
L1 2-jet trigger +…
+ Double-arm 420 condition: only possible after increase of L1 latency would allow to select events that are gold plated wrt mass
resolution note: single-sided 220 m cond. and asymmetric cond. select
events with worst possible mass resolution
At 420 m & 420 m
500150 30 10
Achievable total reduction: 30 x 2 (HT cond.) x 2 (topological cond.) = 120!
34
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
A) L1: 220 m single-arm condition with a cut
B) Back-to-backness of jets (2.8 < ΔΦ< 2.48 rad) and
(E1T –E2
T)/(E1T + E2
T) < 0.4 and ET> 40 GeV
C) reconstructed from jets in the central detector +(-) = s-½∑ETi exp(-
(+)ηi); cut: difference between 2 values larger than 2σ. No simulation of RP
reconstruction available so far. Assumed resolution of 15% (20%) at 220 (420) m
D) Either one of the 2 jets b-tagged
E) A proton seen at 420 m
No pile-up case: no QCD bgd survives selection. HLT selection cond. A+B+C A+B+D A+B+C+E
HLT rate L=1x1033cm-2s-1 15 Hz 20 Hz < 1Hz
HLT rate L=2x1033cm-2s-1 60 Hz 80 Hz 1 Hz
Signal eff. H bb (120 GeV) 11% 7% 6%
Desired target output rate; no loss in efficiency compared to L1
HLT studies
35
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
FAMOS (Fast CMS Simulation) + RPs acceptance tables
DPEMC MC:
tt production inclusive DPE for the semileptonic channel (tt bb qq μ ν ) good rejection of QCD background obtained for SD the cross section should increase by a factor 30-40
B production SD and DPE production of B-mesons with B J/psi μ μ tens of events for 10 fb-1 in DPE case and several hundreds in SD case
W and WW production DPE inclusive W production: abundant process can be studies at lumi
where pile up is small DPE exclusive WW production: 10 events in 10 fb-1
N.B.: 10 fb-1 collected in 60 days of LHC running @ 2x1033 cm-
2s-1
Hard diffractive QCD studies
36
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Inclusive dijet production pp pXjjp
Was used by CDF to measure diffractive structure function of the proton: similar measurement possible at CMS, with wider kinematic coverage ( > 0.02 (0.002) compared to > 0.035 at CDF); statistical accuracy of CDF measurement could be reached within a few days of running at ~1032 cm-2 s-1
Comparison of DPE and SD rates for dijet production would give information on the hard diffractive factorisation breaking at the LHC
Exclusive dijet production pp pjjp Cross section for central exclusive production of dijets order of 1 nb
high rate allows precise determination of the off-diagonal un-integrated gluon densities uncertainties in exclusive production cross section of Higgs to be reduced to 1% level
Hard diffractive dijet prod.
37
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Events with a fast proton in the final state can also originate from the exchange of a vector boson. In particular, tagging one leading proton allows the selection of photon-proton events with known photon energy; likewise tagging two leading protons gives access to photon-photon interactions of well known center of mass energy [PRD 63 070152, hep-ex/0201027].
γp and γγ physics
p
p
e.g.: exclusive 2- γ production of lepton pairs is an important calibration process (forward e+e- pairs in Castor with proton tag, observed cross section 3 pb, μ+μ- would double the statistics)
38
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
SM Higgs with ~120 GeV:
gg H, H b bbar mode has highest BRBut signal swamped by gg b bbar
Best bet with CMS: H , where in 30 fb-1 S/√B 4.4
Light SM Higgs at the LHC (I)
39
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Production cross section times branching ratio for CEPFrom implementation of KMR model in Exhume MC
Light SM Higgs at the LHC (II)
40
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Intense-coupling regime of the MSSM: Mh~MA ~ MH ~ O(100GeV): their coupling to, WW*, ZZ* strongly suppressed discovery very challenging at the LHC
Cross section of two scalar (0+) Higgs bosons enhanced compared to SM Higgs
CEP as discovery channel
see Kaidalov et al, hep-ph/0307064, hep-ph/0311023
100 fb
1 fb
120 140
-
“3-way mixing” scenario of CP-violating MSSM: the 3 neutral Higgs bosons are nearly degenerate,mix strongly and have masses close to 120 GeV
Superior mass resolution from tagged proton allows disentangling theHiggs bosons by measuring their production line shape
Explicit CP-violation in Higgs sector visible as asymmetry in the azimuthal distribution of tagged protons (interference of P- and P+ amplitudes) (Khoze et al., hep-ph/0401078)
CEP as CP and line-shape analyzer !
MSSM and proton tagging
41
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Difference between DPEMC and (EDDE/ExHuMe) is an effect of Sudakov suppression factor growing as the available phase space forgluon emission increases with increasing mass of the central system
Models predict different physics potentials !
DPE Higgs production: models (I)
43
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
More central rapidity in ExHuMe due to gluon distr. falling more sharply than the Pomeron parameterisation in DPEMC N.B: acceptance of forward proton taggers sensitive to the rapidity
distribution of central system.
Cut ξ = 0.1 applied in DPEMC as required by Bialas-Landshoff appr.
DPE Higgs production: models (III)
44
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. RuspaDPE Higgs event generators
1. DPEMC 2.4 (M.Boonekamp, T.Kucs) - Bialas-Landshof model for Pomeron flux within proton - Rap. gap survival probability = 0.03 - HERWIG for hadronization
2. EDDE 1.2 (V.Petrov, R.Ryutin) - Regge-eikonal approach to calculate soft proton vertices - Sudakov factor to suppress radiation into rap.gap - PYTHIA for hadronization
3. ExHuMe 1.3 (J.Monk, A.Pilkington) - Durham model for exclusive diffraction (pert. calc. by KMR) - Improved unintegrated gluon pdfs - Sudakov factor to suppress radiation into rap.gap + rap.gap survival prob.= 0.03 - PYTHIA for hadronization
All three models
available in the fast
CMS simulation
45
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
DPE Higgs production studies
Models: EDDE, EXHUME, DPEMC, all in FAMOS; RPs acceptance tables
H bb in SM: back-to-backness of the jets, b-tag, two final state protons, consistency of mass reconstruction between RPs and central detector: 2-4 signal events per 30 fb-1
suppression of backgrounds rely on resolution of RP
H WW* in SM [EPJ C45 (2006) 401]: 1-7 events depending on mass range per 30 fb-1
suppression of background does not rely on resolution of RPs irreducible backgrounds small and controllable
N.B.: 30 fb-1 collected in 30 days of LHC running @ 1034 cm-2s-
1
46
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
- Recent versions of DPEMC, EDDE and ExHuMe generators as well as new RP acceptances available in CMS fast simulation
- H->bb: Difficult channel. Cross sections, RP and b-tag efficiencies for
signal well established but the selection cuts still being tuned. BG = ISSUE ! None of the models treats bg properly. The bg issue needs an input from theory side.
- Comparison of generators: Rich resource in HERA-LHC proceedings Non-negligible differences in basic quantities (ξ and yH) influencing RP acceptances
- Comparison to data: Hard task to make a comparison to the only avail.
data (Rjj distr. from RunII). Hope to get a good description, though.
DPE Higgs production studies
47
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
- H->WW in SM: Solid numbers for signal including L1-trigger
Bg is small and controllable Promising channel for mh>130 GeV
- H->WW (bb,tautau) in MSSM: Idea of Durham group (V.Khoze et al.).
In some scenarios and in some regions of (mA,tanβ)
a much higher yield than in SM case. Especially promising for Higgs -> bb and Higgs -> tautau channels
DPE Higgs production studies
48
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
Photon fluxes introduced in CALCHEP/COMPHEP,photon events then fed to PYTHIA for decays and
hadronization
CMS full detector simulation + RPs acceptance tables
γγ interactions: 2-γ production of W pairs: studies of quartic gauge couplings
γγWW (LEP limits are weak due to limited cms energy) Exclusive 2- γ production of lepton pairs is an important
calibration process (forward e+e- pairs in Castor with proton tag, observed cross section 3 pb)
γp interactions:
photoproduction of H: significant cross-section at LHC and good signal-to-background ratio; low mass region with Higgs decaying to bb, and W;
W boson production at high transverse momentum, top pair production via photon-gluon fusion, …
DY: qqbar ll
gammagamma ll
γp and γγ physics
49
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa Drell-Yan
50
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. Ruspa
HERA x down to 10-5 ; LHC can probe very low x down to 10-6, 10-7
Low-x studies
Drell-Yan: pp qq */Z e+e- X
Sensitive to very low-x partons in the proton (x~10-6 to 10-7) Detect electrons in CASTOR (5.2 < || < 6.6) Can enhance signal/background ratio by requiring track in T2
51
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. RuspaSurvey of accessible diff/fwd processes (III)
Inclusive DPE prod of t tbar: (A. Vilela Pereira) semileptonic decay channel: pp p+X+(tt)+X+p; tt bbqq
DPEMC and Pomwig generators Require 2 protons in 220m and/or 420m detectors
Event yield 1-10 per 10fb-1, depending on theoretical model, but taking supression factor of 0.03 into account
DPE and SD prod of B J/ (D. Damiao)DPEMC MCEvent yields per 10 pb-1: DPE: tens of events SD: several hundreds of events
SD and DPE with hard scale: Production of heavy quarks
52
DIS06, 20-24/04/06, M. RuspaSurvey of accessible diff/fwd processes (IV)
DPE pp pYWp
DPE excl prod pp pWWpdominated by QED
DPEMC MC require 2 protons, in 220m and/or 420m detectors several thousand events of type W eand W expected per 1 fb-1
together with SD prod of W can be used to measure hard diffractive factorisation breaking with LHC data alone
DPE with hard scale: DPE prod of W and W-pairs (A. Loginov)
DPE prod of W-pairs relatively rare process dominated by QED require 2 protons, in 220m and/or 420m detectors expects about 1 event per fb-1
this small SM expectation would allow detection of anomalous WW prod, as e.g. predicted in theory of supercritical pomeron