InformationThese template sheets come with some scores already
entered into cells.These scores act as placeholders and demonstrate
what scores are necessary. The only sheets that require any user
input is the WISC-IV sheet.All cells, except those requiring entry,
are protected. Use the TAB key to move from input cell to input
cell.****Be sure to delete any scores that do not pertain to your
particular case.****We (Ron Dumont and John Willis) and The
Psychological Corporation, take no responsibility for any errors
made while using these templates.There may be some differences
between some of the templates reporting and data in the WISC-IV
Manuals.The Percentiles reported here are simple SS to Percentile
lookups. They are based upon the normal curve distribution.The
Composite and FSIQ ranges are based upon a formula (SEE, page 37,
WISC-IV Technical and Interpretive Manual).Critical Values for
subtest differences are approximations - because there are so many
subtest combinations available, the template uses the rounded
average of all possible critical values. Please refer to page 265,
WISC-IV Administration and Scoring Manual for actual values for the
10 core subtestsGf-Gc configurations were adapted from Appendix A,
pp. 445 453, The Intelligence Test Desk Reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc
Cross-Battery Assessment (McGrew & Flanagan, 1998) and Table
8.3, p. 312, The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc Theory
(Flanagan, McGrew & Ortiz, 2000)
WISC IVWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition
The Psychological Corporation., 2003. All Rights
ReservedDumont-Willis WISC-IV Interpretive WorksheetUse the TAB key
to navigate to cells requiring inputName:TashaDate of
Test:9/14/99Date Analyzed:9/12/00200391520039915Date of
Birth:3/5/92Age:7 years, 6 months, 9 days1996367697 years, 6
months, 9
days000months,days124567891011121316182025303545556570758085SUBTESTSssVCIPRIWMPSFull
ScalePR0age grpCheck the subtests used in the Full Scale IQ
calculation (7 required). Core subtests are those with
borders1110.10bd1pVCIPRIfspsiglwmips2220.4sim1v1713551015271533310ds1w4442pcn1pssss55550cd1s6669v1vS
V C1BD MR PCn1777160lns1wI V C0BD MR PCmp088825mr1p2psiS I
C099937comp1v3PRIS V I0BD PCmp PCn0101010500ss1s3verbalWR V
C011(11)063pcn0p2wmS WR C0PCmp MR PCn012(12)075The VCI is based
upon the following subtests: S V Cca0s10totalS V WR013(13)084i0vv
combo1p combo1cd or ss114(14)091The PRI is based upon the following
subtests: BD MR PCna0w15(15)095wr0vSums of Scaled
Scores1713101555Process ScoresBlock Design No Time Bonus1698Digit
Span Forward1799Digit Span Backward1899.6Cancellation
Random1999.9Cancellation Sequenced10.1Longest Digit Forward (raw
score)2Longest Digit Backward (raw score)3s12bd11cd15ds13WISC-IV
Interpretive Worksheetv16pcn14ss110ln171. Evaluate the Full Scale
IQc19mr18ca112a11422ObtainedPercentileConfidencei113pcm111327324SS
TotalsIQRankBandswr11514524Verbal Comprehension(17)1005094 -
106Average to
Average0.941003.45378053735.6987378866941064Perceptual
Reasoning(13)1005094 - 106Average to
Average0.921003.90322943216.4403285639410655415Working
Memory(10)1005094 - 106Average to High
Average0.921003.90322943216.44032856394106Vx=9945Px=6120FSx=8vp
diff0Processing Speed(15)1005092 - 108Average to
Average0.881004.5726141327.544813317892108v max15p max1115100Full
Scale(55)1005096 - 104Average to
Average0.971002.5201339254.158220976396104v min2p
min1114diff13diff10fs sc diff14v scat0p scat2.311fs scat0.10.42. Is
the VCI versus PRI Significantly Different? Note: See Table B.1 for
standardization frequency1213fs scat0.414fs scat0.4SignificanceIs
there a significant difference?0VCI (100) vs PRI (100) Difference(p
< .01)(p < .05)none0points-10 points15 or more110 -
10NO0Because there is no significant differences between the VCI
and PRI, explain the meaning of the scales not being significantly
different.-1Because there is a significant difference between the
VCI and PRI, interpret the FSIQ with caution. Examine further
steps.Because there is no significant differences between the VCI
and PRI, explain the meaning of the scales not being significantly
different.3. Is the VCI versus PRI Difference Abnormally Large?
Note: See Table B.2 for standardization frequency12345VCI (100) vs
PRI (100) DifferenceSize of Difference needed for abnormalityIs
Size of Difference Abnormal?03115191615200 points (V = P)16NOV =
PIQ group218181618170Because no abnormal differences are found,
determine if the noted differences are interpretable.Because no
abnormal differences are found, determine if the noted differences
are interpretable.Because an abnormal difference was found, explain
the abnormally large VCI vs PRI difference.4. Are the VCI and PRI
composites interpretable? Note: See Table B.6 for standardization
frequencyA. Is there abnormal VCI scatter?Is there abnormal
scatter?Verbal Subtests High-Low DifferenceNormalAbnormal13 points
between 5 subtests0 - 56 or moreYESpointsB. Is there abnormal PRI
scatter?Is there abnormal scatter?Perceptual Reasoning Subtests
High-Low DifferenceNormalAbnormal110 points between 4 subtests0 -
78 or moreYES12Because each answers to A and B was NO, the VCI
versus PRI discrepancy is interpretable.pointsBecause an answer to
either A or B was YES, the VCI versus PRI discrepancy differences
should probably not be interpreted.Because an answer to either A or
B was YES, the VCI versus PRI discrepancy differences should
probably not be interpreted.5. Determine if the Working Memory
Index is interpretable. Note: See Table B.4 for standardization
frequencyA. Is there a significant difference between the Core WMI
subtests?Is there abnormal scatter?WMI Subtests [ DS (3) LNS (7) ]
DifferenceNormalAbnormal44 points0 - 45 or moreNO0pointsThe WMI may
be interpreted.6. Determine if the Processing Speed Index is
interpretable. Note: See Table B.4 for standardization frequencyA.
Is there a significant difference between the Core PSI subtests?Is
there abnormal scatter?PSI Subtests [ SS (10) Cd (5) ]
DifferenceNormalAbnormal55 points0 - 34 or moreYES1pointsBecause of
subtest differences in the PSI, do not interpret PSI.7. Interpret
significant strengths and weaknesses.Verbal Comprehension
mean9.0based on 5 subtestsPerceptual Reasoning mean6.0based on 4
subtestsFull Scale mean8.0based on 15 subtestsVerbal / Perceptual
StatisticsFull Scale StatisticsssCrit. ValueDeviationCrit.
ValueDeviationVerbalSimilarities22-7.0w3-6.0w3-13-11wVocabulary62-3.0w3-2.003-10-100Comprehension920.0031.00000100000000Information1324.0s35.0s31311s000000Word
Reasoning1526.0s37.0s31311s0000003-13-11wPerceptualBlock
Design12-5.0w3-7.0w0-13-11wPicture
Concepts42-2.003-4.0w010000Matrix Reasoning822.0030.00310100Picture
Completion1125.0s33.000000000000-100WMDigit
Span33-5.00Letter-Number
Sequence73-1.0000311sArithmetic14036.0s000-10Pr.
Spd.Coding53-3.0000010Symbol
Search1032.005Cancellation1234.001IDsVACSPCPABDOADsm8. Compare
relevant subtest groupings (.05 level of significance)Word
Reasoning (15) > Matrix Reasoning (8)7 point significant
differencewr/mr2>7significantMatrix Reasoning (8) < Block
Design (1)7 point significant differencemr/bd3 Picture Concepts
(4)2 point nonsignificant
differencesim/pcm2>2nonsignificantInformation (13) >
Comprehension (9)4 point significant
differencei/c2>4significantDigit Span (3) < Arithmetic (14)11
point significant differenceds/a37significant0Coding (10) <
Symbol Search (5)5 point significant differencecd/ss3