WHAT’S NEW ? WHAT’S NEW ? AL HISLOP AL HISLOP Electrical Engineer Electrical Engineer CARE CARE July 1, 2003 July 1, 2003
WHAT’S WHAT’S NEW ?NEW ?
AL HISLOPAL HISLOP
Electrical EngineerElectrical Engineer
CARECARE
July 1, 2003July 1, 2003
TWO MAJOR CHANGESTWO MAJOR CHANGESSINCE 1999 DENIALSINCE 1999 DENIAL
DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA PATTERNSDIRECTIONAL ANTENNA PATTERNS
LOWER TOWERLOWER TOWER
LCG RF REPORTLCG RF REPORTSAYS RF SAYS RF INCREASESINCREASES
TO SOUTH AND TO SOUTH AND EASTEAST
RF EMISSIONS STUDY CONCLUSIONS, RF EMISSIONS STUDY CONCLUSIONS, LCG Ex. 17, CARE Ex. 80, Pink DividerLCG Ex. 17, CARE Ex. 80, Pink Divider
RF LEVEL RF LEVEL INCREASESINCREASES
WHY?WHY?
RF ERP INCREASED BY 9 MEGAWATTSRF ERP INCREASED BY 9 MEGAWATTS
ANTENNA PATTERN MAXIMUM TO SOUTHANTENNA PATTERN MAXIMUM TO SOUTHSee LCG Ex. 17See LCG Ex. 17
ANTENNAS NOT ABOVE POPULATED ANTENNAS NOT ABOVE POPULATED AREAAREA
LCG Lookout Mt.LCG Lookout Mt.ERP IncreaseERP Increase
LCG ERP on LookoutLCG ERP on Lookout Proposal = Proposal =
9,732,000 watts9,732,000 watts
Present = Present = 732,000 watts732,000 watts
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Present
Proposed
ERP(kW)
JEFFERSON COUNTY JEFFERSON COUNTY TOWER SITING TOWER SITING REQUIREMENTSREQUIREMENTS
TOWER LOW WITH RESPECT TO RIDGELINETOWER LOW WITH RESPECT TO RIDGELINE
ANTENNAS LOCATED ABOVE POPULATED ANTENNAS LOCATED ABOVE POPULATED AREASAREAS
THE LCG SITE CANNOT COMPLY
NEGATIVES OF LOW TOWER NEGATIVES OF LOW TOWER DESIGNDESIGN
LOW TOWER = INCREASED LOW TOWER = INCREASED RADIATION IN COMMUNITYRADIATION IN COMMUNITY
Antennas mounted length of towerAntennas mounted length of tower
ANTENNAS POINT DIRECTLY AT ANTENNAS POINT DIRECTLY AT RESIDENCESRESIDENCES
MY MY HOMEHOME
LIKE ENRON AND WORLDCOM
RF LEVELSRF LEVELS EXPRESSED AS µW/cm EXPRESSED AS µW/cm22
USE OF % MPE IGNORES USE OF % MPE IGNORES INTERFERENCE POTENTIALINTERFERENCE POTENTIAL
USE OF % MPE CAN MASK RF USE OF % MPE CAN MASK RF INCREASESINCREASES
ONLY
15.2 μW
8.4µW
6.5µW4.0µW
3.3µW
DISCONNECT FROM DISCONNECT FROM TRUTHTRUTH
LCG SAYS RF LEVELS WILL GO DOWNLCG SAYS RF LEVELS WILL GO DOWN
JEFFCO’S CONSULTANT MR. HART JEFFCO’S CONSULTANT MR. HART CONFIRMS RF LEVELS WILL INCREASE CONFIRMS RF LEVELS WILL INCREASE OVER WIDE AREAOVER WIDE AREA
LCG CLAIMS QUIET ZONE EXEMPTIONLCG CLAIMS QUIET ZONE EXEMPTION
NO DTV QUIET ZONE EXEMPTION NO DTV QUIET ZONE EXEMPTION EXISTSEXISTS
QUIET ZONE ISSUE CAN QUIET ZONE ISSUE CAN AFFECT LOCAL RF AFFECT LOCAL RF
LEVELSLEVELS BY LAW, LCG CANNOT USE PROPOSEDBY LAW, LCG CANNOT USE PROPOSED
ANTENNAPATTERNSANTENNAPATTERNS
LCG MAY ROTATE PATTERNS 90 LCG MAY ROTATE PATTERNS 90 DEGREESDEGREES
LOCAL LEVELS TO WEST WOULD LOCAL LEVELS TO WEST WOULD INCREASEINCREASE
SOLUTION TO QUIET ZONE SOLUTION TO QUIET ZONE PROBLEM: ROTATE PROBLEM: ROTATE
PATTERNPATTERNLOW FIELD TO NORTHHIGH FIELD TO WEST
LOW FIELD TO WEST
ANTENNA PATTERNSANTENNA PATTERNS NOT IN ODP NOT IN ODP
IF APPROVED, JEFFCO HAS NO CONTROL OF IF APPROVED, JEFFCO HAS NO CONTROL OF ANTENNA PATTERNSANTENNA PATTERNS
NO GUARANTEE OF REDUCED RF TO WESTNO GUARANTEE OF REDUCED RF TO WEST
RF INCREASES MAY BE EVEN RF INCREASES MAY BE EVEN HIGHER HIGHER THAN THAN CALCULATED IN POPULATED AREASCALCULATED IN POPULATED AREAS
LCG HAS HAD YEARS TO RESOLVELCG HAS HAD YEARS TO RESOLVE
COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATIONCOSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION
““BREAKTHROUGH IN UNDERSTANDING BREAKTHROUGH IN UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGINS OF THE UNIVERSE”THE ORIGINS OF THE UNIVERSE”
FEB 2003 NASA RELEASE FEB 2003 NASA RELEASE MAP SPACECRAFTMAP SPACECRAFT
MAP OF THE UNIVERSEMAP OF THE UNIVERSE& INTERFERENCE& INTERFERENCE
SENSITIVE RECEIVER COMPONENTS MADESENSITIVE RECEIVER COMPONENTS MADE ON LOOKOUT MOUNTAINON LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN SOME OF THE MOST SENSITIVE RECEIVERS EVER MADE.SOME OF THE MOST SENSITIVE RECEIVERS EVER MADE.
TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES IN THE LAST 10 YEARS TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES IN THE LAST 10 YEARS MADE THESE RECEIVERS POSSIBLE.MADE THESE RECEIVERS POSSIBLE.
WHAT ADVANCES IN THE NEXT 50 YEARS?WHAT ADVANCES IN THE NEXT 50 YEARS?
MITIGATIONMITIGATION
SPENT $40,000 FOR SHIELDINGSPENT $40,000 FOR SHIELDING
NOT DONE YETNOT DONE YET
INTERFERENCE INTERFERENCE EXAMPLE:EXAMPLE:
MOUNTSFIELD AVE.MOUNTSFIELD AVE.
ALREADY EXPERIENCING HIGH ALREADY EXPERIENCING HIGH INTERFERENCE PROBLEMSINTERFERENCE PROBLEMS
RF POWER DENSITY FROM LCG RF POWER DENSITY FROM LCG MEMBERS MEMBERS ALONEALONE WOULD DOUBLE WOULD DOUBLE FROM 7.5 TO 15.2 FROM 7.5 TO 15.2 μμW/cmW/cm22
MOUNTSFIELD LCG LEVELMOUNTSFIELD LCG LEVELCOMPARED TO BLANKETINGCOMPARED TO BLANKETING
INTERFERENCE LEVELINTERFERENCE LEVEL
0.084
15.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
BLANKETING
uW/ cm2
180 x BLANKETING
MOUNTSFIELD
INTERFERENCEINTERFERENCE
TLUP : ANTENNAS TLUP : ANTENNAS ABOVEABOVE RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE. MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE.
LCG INTERFERENCE REMEDIATION PLANLCG INTERFERENCE REMEDIATION PLAN
ONLY A FEW DEVICESONLY A FEW DEVICES
ONLY ONE YEAR.ONLY ONE YEAR.
LCG INTERFERENCE PLANLCG INTERFERENCE PLAN
LIMITED IN SCOPE AND TIMELIMITED IN SCOPE AND TIME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
YEARS
% D
EV
ICE
S C
OV
ER
ED
INTERFERENCE NOT COVERED
INTERFERENCE COVERED
FCC Ignores 4 CARE Petitions FCC Ignores 4 CARE Petitions for Relief from Interferencefor Relief from Interference
March 9, 1999 March 9, 1999 Ex. 35Ex. 35
October 17, 2000 October 17, 2000 Ex. 36Ex. 36
August 23, 2002August 23, 2002 Ex. 89Ex. 89
September 20, 2002 September 20, 2002 Ex. 89Ex. 89
Result-No help from FCC Result-No help from FCC
LOCATE TOWER AWAY LOCATE TOWER AWAY FROM PEOPLEFROM PEOPLE
PROPER LOCATION AWAY FROM PEOPLE AND PROPER LOCATION AWAY FROM PEOPLE AND BUSINESSES BUSINESSES
WOULD MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE WOULD MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE FOR ALL DEVICES FOR ALL DEVICES ALL THE TIMEALL THE TIME
Why a one year plan for a 50 or 100 year project?
NO SUBSTITUTE FOR PROPER NO SUBSTITUTE FOR PROPER SITINGSITING
HIGH POWER BROADCAST FACILITIES HIGH POWER BROADCAST FACILITIES AWAY FROM POPULATED AREAS.AWAY FROM POPULATED AREAS.
DOES NOT CONFORM WITH DOES NOT CONFORM WITH RESIDENTIAL INTERFERENCE RESIDENTIAL INTERFERENCE POLICIES.POLICIES.
ALTERNATE SITES EXISTALTERNATE SITES EXIST
SQUAW MOUNTAIN RECEPTION TESTS:SQUAW MOUNTAIN RECEPTION TESTS:EXCELLENT RESULTSEXCELLENT RESULTS
SQUAW MOUNTAIN ALREADY ZONED SQUAW MOUNTAIN ALREADY ZONED FOR TV BROADCASTFOR TV BROADCAST
LCG’S CONCERNS ABOUT LCG’S CONCERNS ABOUT SQUAW MOUNTAINSQUAW MOUNTAIN
““LOST VIEWERS”LOST VIEWERS”
INADEQUATE SPACEINADEQUATE SPACE
““VERTICAL REAL ESTATE”VERTICAL REAL ESTATE”
WHAT THE FCC SAYS YOU NEED
WHAT THE FCC SAYS YOU NEED
IF YOU DON’T HAVE THIS MUCH SIGNAL,
LCG SAYS YOU ARE A “ LOST VIEWER ”
HOW MUCH SIGNAL DO YOU NEED?
SPACE REQUIREMENTSSPACE REQUIREMENTS
SQUAW MOUNTAIN ZONED FOR SQUAW MOUNTAIN ZONED FOR THREE 200 FOOT TOWERSTHREE 200 FOOT TOWERS
AT MOST 3 ANTENNAS NEEDED TO AT MOST 3 ANTENNAS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE LCG DIGITALACCOMMODATE LCG DIGITAL
ANALOG REMAINS UNTIL PHASEOUTANALOG REMAINS UNTIL PHASEOUT
DTV SITES ON PLAINSDTV SITES ON PLAINS
DTV CHANNEL 30 FROM CHEYENNE DTV CHANNEL 30 FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING RECEIVED IN LITTLETON WYOMING RECEIVED IN LITTLETON (OVER 100 MILES AWAY)(OVER 100 MILES AWAY)
ANTENNA 530 FEET ABOVE AVERAGE ANTENNA 530 FEET ABOVE AVERAGE TERRAINTERRAIN
TRANSMITTING LESS THAN 10% OF TRANSMITTING LESS THAN 10% OF MAXIMUM ALLOWED POWERMAXIMUM ALLOWED POWER
DTV SITES ON PLAINSDTV SITES ON PLAINS
KWHD CHANNEL 46 DTV KWHD CHANNEL 46 DTV CASTLEROCK “ON THE AIR”CASTLEROCK “ON THE AIR”
ANTENNA 590 FEET ABOVE AVERAGE ANTENNA 590 FEET ABOVE AVERAGE TERRAINTERRAIN
REAL REASON LCGREAL REASON LCGCHOSE LOOKOUT CHOSE LOOKOUT
MOUNTAINMOUNTAIN
LCG LETTER TO JEFFCO PLANNING:LCG LETTER TO JEFFCO PLANNING:March 6, 1998March 6, 1998
““Fourth, and perhaps most Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, Lake Cedar Group importantly, Lake Cedar Group controls a large assemblage of controls a large assemblage of property on Lookout Mountain.”property on Lookout Mountain.”
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION THE LCG PROPOSAL THE LCG PROPOSAL
INCREASES RF LEVELS OVER A LARGE INCREASES RF LEVELS OVER A LARGE POPULATED AREAPOPULATED AREA
DOES NOT MEET INTERFERENCE DOES NOT MEET INTERFERENCE POLICYPOLICY
STAFF AND JEFFCO RF CONSULTANT,STAFF AND JEFFCO RF CONSULTANT,
MR. HART, AGREE:MR. HART, AGREE:
VIABLE ALTERNATE SITES EXISTVIABLE ALTERNATE SITES EXIST