VISUM ET REPERTUM
pada KORBAN HIDUP
Forensic and Legal Medicine Department
Faculty of Medicine
Hasanuddin University
Visum et Repertum
DEFENITION HISTORY
VER FORM
LEGAL GROUND FLOW CHART
Definition
Visum et Repertum (VeR) latin Visum : that which is seen or appear
et : and
Repertum : discover
Written report about what was seen and discovered for the sake of justice
History
January 26th, 1732 Written by Johann
Flckinger
The case of Arnond Paole in the Village Medvegya (Medvea or Medvedja) of Serb
Signed by no less than five officers in the Army of Charles VI, Emperor of Austria (three of them were doctors)
Legal Ground
Article 133 Indonesian Criminal-law Procedural Code
clause (1)
clause (2)
Article 184 Indonesian Criminal-law Procedural Code
clause (1)
Article 187 Indonesian Criminal-law Procedural Code
Dalam hal penyidik untuk kepentingan peradilan
menangani seorang korban baik luka, keracunan
ataupun mati yang diduga karena peristiwa yang
merupakan tindak pidana, ia berwenang mengajukan
permintaan keterangan ahli kepada ahli kedokteran
kehakiman atau dokter dan atau ahli lainnya
Permintaan keterangan ahli sebagaimana dimaksud
dalam ayat (1) dilakukan secara tertulis, yang dalam
surat itu disebutkan dengan tegas untuk pemeriksaan
luka atau pemeriksaan mayat dan atau pemeriksaan
bedah mayat
Alat bukti yang sah ialah:
a. Keterangan saksi;
b. Keterangan ahli;
c. Surat;
d. Petunjuk;
e. Keterangan terdakwa.
Surat sebagaimana tersebut pada pasal 184 ayat (1) huruf c, dibuat atas nama sumpah jabatan atau dikuatkan dengan sumpah, adalah:
a. Berita acara dan surat lain dalam bentuk resmi yang dibuat oleh pejabat umum yang berwenang atau yang dibuat dihadapannya, yang memuat keterangan tentang kejadian atau keadaan yang didengar, dilihat atau yang dialaminya sendiri, disertai dengan alasan yang jelas dan tegas tentang keterangannya itu;
b. Surat yang dibuat menurut ketentutan perundang-undangan atau surat yang dibuat oleh pejabat mengenai hal yang termasuk dalam tata laksana yang menjadi tanggung jawabnya dan yang diperntukkan bagi pembuktian sesuatu hal atau sesuatu keadaan;
c. Surat keterangan dari seorang ahli yang memuat pendapat berdasarkan keahliannya mengenai sesuatu hal atau sesuatu keadaan yang diminta secara resmi dan padanya;
d. Surat lain yang hanya dapat berlaku jika hubungannya dengan isi dari alat pembuktian yang lain.
Penyidik adalah:
(a) Pejabat polisi negara Republik Indonesia
(b) Pejabat pegawai negeri sipil tertentu yang diberi
wewenang khusus oleh undang-undang
Autopsy Request
FORENSIC AND MEDICOLEGAL
DEPARTMENT
Autopsy Warrant
Autopsy preparation
Plennary disscussion
Visum et Repertum Report
Autopsy performed
Flow Chart for VeR Report
External Examination Request
FORENSIC AND MEDICOLEGAL
DEPARTMENT
Examination Warrant
Examination preparation
Plennary disscussion
Visum et Repertum Report
Examination performed
PASIEN
SPV
RUMAH SAKIT
PERAWATAN
DOKTER FORENSIK
LAPORAN VISUM ET
REPERTUM
PASIEN
RUMAH SAKIT
PERAWATAN
DOKTER FORENSIK
SPV
HARI I
HARI II
LAPORAN VISUM ET
REPERTUM
RESUME MEDIK
PASIEN
RUMAH SAKIT
PERAWATAN
DOKTER FORENSIK
SPV
HARI I
HARI 19
LAPORAN VISUM ET
REPERTUM
MEDICAL RECORD
PASIEN
DISCHARGE (KELUAR RS)
HARI 17
RESUME MEDIK
PASIEN
RUMAH SAKIT
PERAWATAN
DOKTER FORENSIK
SPV HARI I
LAPORAN VISUM ET
REPERTUM
MEDICAL RECORD
KONDISI STABIL
HARI 4
HARI 17
VeR form
Projustitia
Introduction
Report
Summary
Conclusion
Closure
VeR is a legal document; highly confidential and for the sake of justica
The date and time the examination request letter (SPV) were made and received; Identity of the requesting party; The examination time and place; Identity of the victim as stated by the SPV;
The circumstances surrounding the victims wound
Anamnesis; external examination; internal examination; supporting examination
All the significant finding that according to the examiner can support the conclusion
The mechanism written as the cause of damage should be selected from the current established understanding in the medical field
Date and place where VeR report were released; identitiy of the examiner; VeR was made based on the examiner knowlegde and Professional Oath
Projustitia
VeR is a legal document; highly confidential and for
the sake of justica
Introduction
The date and time the examination request letter
(SPV) were made and received; Identity of the
requesting party; The examination time and place;
Identity of the victim as stated by the SPV; The circumstances
surrounding the victims wound
The victims identity should be double checked with the label
attached to the part of the victim (on deceased victim)
Report
Anamnesis; External examination; Supporting
examination
Written down all we have seen and discovered (every findings), using the simplest
language possible for layman (for those who have no
medical background)
The description should be written as clear as possible
For deceased victim: External Examination Internal Examination Supporting Examination
For living victim: Anamnesis
Physical Examination Supporting Examination Management / Medication Last medical condition
Summary
All the significant finding that according to the examiner can support the conclusion
The findings should be arranged in a patobiologic and mechanistic order
Summary is a scientific subjectivity
Conclusion
The mechanism written as the cause of damage (using CODamage form based on
Proximus Morbus Approach) should be selected from the
current established understanding in the medical
field.
Closure
Date and place where VeR report were released;
identitiy of the examiner; VeR was made based on the examiner knowlegde
and Professional Oath
A-3 A-2 A-1
B
A-1 : Luka tusuk pada lengan kiri atas A-2 : Kerusakan jaringan kulit, otot dan pembuluh darah A-n : Trauma akibat benda tajam bermata satu (anak busur) II : -
A-n A-4 A-3 A-2 A-1
B
A-1 : Current damage A-2 : The cause preceded the 1 A-3 : The cause preceded the 2 A-4 : The cause preceded the 3 A-n : Underlying cause of damage II : Other significant condition, contributing to the damage, but not
directly related to A (Current damage)