The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment Alan S. Gerber; Donald P. Green The American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 3. (Sep., 2000), pp. 653-663. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0554%28200009%2994%3A3%3C653%3ATEOCTC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9 The American Political Science Review is currently published by American Political Science Association. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/apsa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Sun Nov 4 11:28:22 2007
17
Embed
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: AField Experiment
Alan S. Gerber; Donald P. Green
The American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 3. (Sep., 2000), pp. 653-663.
The American Political Science Review is currently published by American Political Science Association.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtainedprior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content inthe JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/journals/apsa.html.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.
The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academicjournals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community takeadvantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A FieldExperimentAlan S. Gerber; Donald P. GreenThe American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 3. (Sep., 2000), pp. 653-663.Stable URL:
This article references the following linked citations. If you are trying to access articles from anoff-campus location, you may be required to first logon via your library web site to access JSTOR. Pleasevisit your library's website or contact a librarian to learn about options for remote access to JSTOR.
[Footnotes]
2 The Effects of Race of the Interviewer on Measures of Electoral Participation by Blacks inSRC National Election StudiesBarbara A. Anderson; Brian D. Silver; Paul R. AbramsonThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 1. (Spring, 1988), pp. 53-83.Stable URL:
2 The Hawthorne Effect in Election Studies: The Impact of Survey Participation on VotingDonald Granberg; Soren HolmbergBritish Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22, No. 2. (Apr., 1992), pp. 240-247.Stable URL:
2 How Being Interviewed Affects Voting: An ExperimentRobert E. Kraut; John B. McConahayThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3. (Autumn, 1973), pp. 398-406.Stable URL:
2 Response Validity in Surveys of Voting BehaviorMichael W. Traugott; John P. KatoshThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3. (Autumn, 1979), pp. 359-377.Stable URL:
9 The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter BehaviorGerald H. KramerThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4. (Winter, 1970-1971), pp. 560-572.Stable URL:
9 Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting BehaviorSamuel J. EldersveldThe American Political Science Review, Vol. 50, No. 1. (Mar., 1956), pp. 154-165.Stable URL:
Effects of Telephone Canvassing on Turnout and Preferences: A Field ExperimentWilliam C. Adams; Dennis J. SmithThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 3. (Autumn, 1980), pp. 389-395.Stable URL:
The Effects of Race of the Interviewer on Measures of Electoral Participation by Blacks inSRC National Election StudiesBarbara A. Anderson; Brian D. Silver; Paul R. AbramsonThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 1. (Spring, 1988), pp. 53-83.Stable URL:
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental VariablesJoshua D. Angrist; Guido W. Imbens; Donald B. RubinJournal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, No. 434. (Jun., 1996), pp. 444-455.Stable URL:
A Controlled Experiment to Measure the Effects of Personal Contact CampaigningJohn C. BlydenburghMidwest Journal of Political Science, Vol. 15, No. 2. (May, 1971), pp. 365-381.Stable URL:
Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting BehaviorSamuel J. EldersveldThe American Political Science Review, Vol. 50, No. 1. (Mar., 1956), pp. 154-165.Stable URL:
The Hawthorne Effect in Election Studies: The Impact of Survey Participation on VotingDonald Granberg; Soren HolmbergBritish Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22, No. 2. (Apr., 1992), pp. 240-247.Stable URL:
Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and theParty CanvassRobert Huckfeldt; John SpragueThe American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 1. (Mar., 1992), pp. 70-86.Stable URL:
The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter BehaviorGerald H. KramerThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4. (Winter, 1970-1971), pp. 560-572.Stable URL:
How Being Interviewed Affects Voting: An ExperimentRobert E. Kraut; John B. McConahayThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3. (Autumn, 1973), pp. 398-406.Stable URL:
The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic AssessmentRichard R. Lau; Lee Sigelman; Caroline Heldman; Paul BabbittThe American Political Science Review, Vol. 93, No. 4. (Dec., 1999), pp. 851-875.Stable URL:
Volunteers for Gore: The Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee CitiesDavid E. Price; Michael LupferThe Journal of Politics, Vol. 35, No. 2. (May, 1973), pp. 410-438.Stable URL:
A Theory of the Calculus of VotingWilliam H. Riker; Peter C. OrdeshookThe American Political Science Review, Vol. 62, No. 1. (Mar., 1968), pp. 25-42.Stable URL:
Response Validity in Surveys of Voting BehaviorMichael W. Traugott; John P. KatoshThe Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3. (Autumn, 1979), pp. 359-377.Stable URL:
Party Contacting and Political Participation, 1952-90Peter W. Wielhouwer; Brad LockerbieAmerican Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, No. 1. (Feb., 1994), pp. 211-229.Stable URL: