University of Nigeria Research Publications NMAI, Godspower Ikechukwu Author PG/MA/95/21928 Title Tele-Evangelism in Nigeria: A Study of its Uses and Gratification Faculty Arts Department Mass Communication Date December, 1997 Signature
University of Nigeria Research Publications
NMAI, Godspower Ikechukwu
Aut
hor
PG/MA/95/21928
Title
Tele-Evangelism in Nigeria: A Study of its Uses and Gratification
Facu
lty
Arts
D
epar
tmen
t
Mass Communication
Dat
e December, 1997
Sign
atur
e
TELE-EVANGELISM IN NIGERIA
A STUDY OF ITS USES AND GRATIFICATIONS
NMAI, GOD'SPOWER IKECHUKWU
REG. NO. PGlMA/95/21928
DEPARTMENT OF MASS COMMUNICATION
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA
NSUKKA
DECEMBER, 1997
TELE-EVANGELISM IN NIGERIA A STUDY OF ITS USES AND GRATIFICATIONS
RESEARCH PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MASS COMMUNICATION
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA
lTIAL FULFILMENT C P ~ D wuu n w n n n n z
PA1 )F THE REQUIREMENTS r v ~ , L I I U nnnnu v; THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF ARTS IN MASS COMMUNICATION
NMAI, GOD'SPOWER IKECHUKWU PG/MA/95/21928
SUPERVISOR : MR. E.N.E. UME - NWAGBO , .
DECEMBER, 1997
ii.
CERTIFICATION
GOD'SPOWER IKECHUKWU NMAI, a postgraduate student
in the Department of Mass Communication with the
Registration Number PG/MA/95/21928 has satisfactorily
completed the requirements for the course and research
work for the degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communi-
cation. The work embodied in this report is original
and has not to the best of knowledge, been submitted
in part or full for other diploma or degree of this
or any other University.
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT
SUPERVISOR
1 6 1 * / 9 8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I acknowledge with appreciation the unparalled
magnanimity of my project supervisor Mr. E.N.E.
Ume-Nwagbo, without whose effort this work would
not have been possible. Words are not enough to
thank you.
I also thank members of the Department of Mass
Communication, U.N.N., especially the Head,f&. Fy.
Dr. P.O.J. Umechukwu, Dr. S.O. Idemili, Mr. Luke Anorue
and Mr. Okoro Nnanyelugo for their numerous assistance.
I am equally grateful to Miss Ngozi Agujobi,
Mr. Eugene Okoro and Mr. Luke Anorue my classmates
for their encouragement in the process of this work.
My sincere gratitude also goes to Mr. Olatunbosun
Omiye and Monday Unumadu for their financial support.
Finally, to God be the flory for the successful
completion of this programme.
GOD'SPOWER.
vi.
CONTENTS
PAGE
TITLE PAGE ................................. i
CERTIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv-v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................... vi
TABLE OF ILLUSTRATIONS .................... vi
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction/Background of The study . . . 1
Statement of Problem ................... 7
Research Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Objective of Study 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Significance of Study 8
Scope of Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Theoretical Framework ................. 9
................... Definition of terms 1 1
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
PAGE
17. Respondents Reasons for Failing To
contribute Money . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 18. Extent To Which Tele-Evangelism
Programmes Affect Viewers1 Life .......5 1
19. Kinds of Effects of Tele-Evangelism
Programmes on Viewers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
TABLE OF ILLUSTRATIONS
TABLE PAGE
1 . Questionnaire Return Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5
2. Respondents1 Sex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6
3 . Respondentsf Age Bracket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4 . Respondents' Religion ................. 3 7
5 . A Breakdown of Christian Denominational
Viewers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 8
6 . Respondents who view Tele-Evangelism
Programmes .......................... 3 9
7 . Frequency of viewing Tele-Evangelism
Programmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0
8 . Tele-Evangelism Viewing Motives ........ 4 2
9. Frequency of Church Attendance . . . . . . . . 4 3
1 0 . Benefits Derived from Viewing
Tele-Evangelism Programmes . . . . . . . . . . . 44
1 1 . Tele-Evangelism Programme Preferences.. 45
12. Respondents Converted to Christianity
Through Tele-Evangelism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6
1 3 . Respondents who changed Denomination
Through Tele-Evangelism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
1 4 . Preference of Tele-Evangelism Programmes
To Church Attendance on sundays . . . . . . . 4 8
15. Effectiveness of Tele-Evangelism
Programmes To Replace Church Attendance... 4 8
1 6 . Viewers' Responses To Call for Monetary
Contribution To Help Sponsor Tele-
Evangelism Programmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY PAGE
3 . 1 Me thod of S t u d y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1
3 . 2 P o p u l a t i o n o f S t u d y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2
3.3 S a m p l e a n d S a m p l i n g P r o c e d u r e . . . . . . . . . . 3 3
3 . 4 Me thod of Data C o l l e c t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3 . 5 Me thod o f D a t a A n a l y s i s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4
CHAPTER FOUR
D A T A PRESENTATION A N D ANALYSES
4 . 1 G e n e r a l R e s u l t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6
4 . 2 P r e s e n t a t i o n And A n a l y s e s o f Data o n
R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 9
4 . 3 D i s c u s s i o n o f F i n d i n g s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY A N D CONCLUSION
5 . 1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9
5 . 2 C o n c l u s i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5 . 3 R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2
APPENDICES 6 5
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY.
Tele-evangelism has become increasingly popular
and prevalent in Nigeria over the past decade. The
prevalence arises from the fact that tele-evangelists
rightly recognise the power of television to instanta-
neously surmount both natural and artificial barriers,
as well as human abstacles to spreading the "God News"
of the gospel. For instance, tele-evangelists under4
stand that within a transmitter's service area, tele-
evangelism costs no more to reach an audience of two
million than an audience of one; the audience members
having voluntarily defrayed part of the cost by
purchasing and operating their own receivers. The
operators of the "electronic churchl1 also recognise the
ability of the broadcast message to enter direct into
the home, once a receiver has been installed. For
instance, consider yourself unable to attend the church
service on Sunday, you are in your home relaxing at a
time the church service is supposed to be going on, and
there, on the screen, is your pastor addressing you
instantaneously. This show the ubiquitous potentials
of tele-evangelism.
Tele-evangelism aims at converting non-christian
audiences to christianity, as well as igniting the fire
of revival in weak christians, and the church as a
corporate entity. However, since the publication of
Katzls (1959,2) mandate that "less attention be paid
to what media do to people and more to what people
do with the media", the perception of media consumers
as active or purposeful selectors and recepients in mass
communication has gathered much support in the scientific
literature.
In particular, uses and gratifications researchers
have identified a variety of motives that reflect the
utility, selectivity and intentionality of audience
activities regarding television use and viewing patterns
(Frank & Greenberg, 1980; Levy & Windahl, 1984).
Prior to the early 1960s, in evaluating the effects
the content of mass communication were supposed to have
on the recipients, as well as the place of the recipient
in the process of mass communication, the recipient had
hitherto been imagined to be perpetually passively
situated at the end of the mass communication process
(Elemeuwa, 1990). This antiquated bullet theory which
essentially sees audience as a mere subject of prefabri-
cated stimuli, standing in a stimulus - response rela-
tionship with the communicator, has been pensioned off
by uses and gratifications researchers. 9 2
Uses and gratifications theory simply states that
man makes use of the mass media as "instances of grati-
fication". In other words, this approach sees man as
making use of the mass media as the source nor the
satisfaction of certain personal interests, wishes and
needs. It sees the audience as active members in the
comunication process.
According to this approach, there are two primary
types of television viewing: ritualized and instrumental
viewing. Ritualized viewing consists of more habitual
viewing of television for diversionary reasons, such
as companionship, time consumption relaxation and a
greater affinity with the medium itself (Rubin, 1984:
67 - 7 7 ) . Instrumental viewing, on the other hand,
reflects a more goal-oriented use of television
content to gratify informational needs or motives. It
should be pointed out that both types of viewing may
be related to different types of programme content and
the dominant characteristics of the audience it attracts.
This study seeks to investigate what the audience
of tele-evangelism, a profoundly less researched programme
type and format, which is unique in its composition
(Horsfield, 1984:129), does with the programmes.
A BRIEF OVERVIEW 0F.TELE-EVANGELISM (IN LAGOS)
Lagos, is the hub of Nigeria's information and
communication highway. The city has a way of coming
out first and being distinguished in any event in the
country. Lagos alone parades an impressive array of
ten television stations. It is for this reason that
the motto of the state is !'The Centre of Excellence".
One manifestation of this " e ~ c e l l e n c e ~ ~ is the current
proliferation of ultr-rich modern-generation pentecostal
churches in the bustling city. The churches (most of
them) have gone fully "electronic" - using television to spread the gospel in obedience to the supreme command
of Jesus Christ, Son of the Most High (Matthew 28:18-20).
Visitors to Lagos and major Nigerian cities will
easily notice the extensive telecasts of religious
programmes sponsored by the '!electronic churches". The
programmes are manufactured by sophisticated socio-
technical work teams that must respond to modern - day marketing demands in order to remain attractive and
competitive.
Sponsored religions programmes, which are currently
carried by all the ten stations in Lagos, have generated
an estimated viewership of about 4 million people
(N.T.A 2, Channel 5 ) . Majority of the programmes are
produced and sponsored by the following churches/tele-
evangelists.
Zoe Ministries Worldwide: Moment of Practical
Christianity . Rev. K.C. Prize Ministries: Ever Increasing Faith . Kingsway Christian Centre: It is not Over Until
it is Over . Later Rain Assembly: Moment of Truth.
Foursquare Gospel Church: Jesus in the Home . El-Shaddai Gospel Church: God that Answers By Fire . Redeemed Christian Church of God: The Unchangeable
God . - Gods Kingdom Society: Search the Scriptures . Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria: Christian Events
Diary . Trinity College of Christian Art: Christian Movies . Pastor Victor Aboh: Praise and Dance - Africa in Vogue .
Most of such programming (over 85 percent) comprise
fire - and - brimestone sermons and church services
conducted by a host of fundamentalist and charismatic
tele-evangelists.
Furthermore, the tele-evangelism also consists of
some programming like career talks, how to manage business,
children's show, news/magazine, musicals, and family
entertainment.
Although some tele-evangelism programming appears
to be similar to secular programming, there are important
differences that are relevant to uses and gratifications
research. Most of the programmes explicitly call for
audience action on and response to various political,
economic and ideological issues. They also offer extensive
spiritual guidance and solicit audience support for their
ministries and to help pay the very expensive costs of
programme production and airtime. The high cost of
airtime is putting the medium beyond the reach of
smaller and many of the orthodox churches (Kate Amam).
These characteristics of the tele-evangelism programmes
are similar but not totally, to American religious
television (OIBrien-Steinfels and Steinfels, 1983).
The employment of familiar formats, alternative
and action-seeking content and eclectic nature, in
tele-evangelism pose some interesting questions about
viewers motives. Viewers motives, therefore, may be
something else more than just ritualized and instrumental
modes of behaviour.
1 . 1 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM.
Television is a powerful medium of mass communica-
tion- powerful because of its ability to combine sound
and picture instantaneously. Tele-evangelists share
a common faith in the power of tele-evangelism to
overcome political and cultural obstacles to world-wide
evangelisation. This faith has been a commanding
impulse in the packaging and sponsoring of evangelism
programmes on television. Nevertheless, viewers are
active participators in the communication (tele-evangelism)
process. The problem now is what people do with tele-
evangelism programmes. Empirical studies are scanty
on this issue; hence this study is pertinent and germane.
1 . 2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This study will attempt to answer the following
questions:
1. Who view5tele-evangelism programmes and how often
do they view the programmes?
2 . Why do they view the programmes?
3. What tele-evangelism programmes ao viewers prefer?
4. What do viewers do with the contents of the
programmes?
5. To what extent do tele-evangelism programmes affect
their lives? 7
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
Considering the unprecedented volume of tele-
evangelism programming in the country, the time is
ripe to encourage thorough studges of what viewers
are doing with the programmes. Knowing what viewers
do with the programmes will establish,how effective,
religiously or otherwise, tele-evangelism is. The
study also aims to make recommendations based on the
research findings.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
Tele-evangelism is highly attractive to Nigerian
preachers. Many yearn to preach the gospel on air but
for financial straitjacket. Yet, neither the operators
of the "electronic church" nor the medium, knows exactly
what viewers do with the programmes. Except tele-evange-
lists and broadcasters learn about how viewers use the
programmes, the may not be able to improve upon their
current exploits.
The findings of this investigation hope to furnish
tele-evangelists and television stations with data on
what is being done with their programmes. It will also
add to the available research literature on the uses
and gratifications theory in general and its application
to religions programmes, which is unique from other
forms of programmes. This work may also constitute
a reference material for further studies.
1.5 SCOPE OF STUDY
This research deals with how and why audiences
watch tele-evangelical programmes and what they do with
the contents of the programmes. The study will focus
on Lagos State which has a high concentration of
television stations and receivers per 1000 of the
population. The state also has well organised tele-
evangelism network which is representative of all the
states in the Southern part of the country.
The choice of Lagos is purposeful and economic.
It will help the researcher save time and cost because
he will be close to the subject of his study. The
cosmopolitan nature of Lagos allows for some, albeit
limited, generalisation of the study data findings.
1.6 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Although the "Uses and Gratifications Paradigm"
lacks a proper statement of demiliting parameters, it
has proved an invaluable research perspective for
communication scholars over the years. Its fundamental
proposition is that members of the mass media audiences
are not "passive" recipients of the mass media and their
fare but active participants in the communication
process, who actually put these media and their fare
to use in addressing their own socio-psychological and
material needs. Such media uses, in turn, result, in
need-related gratifications.
This theory, conjures a broad range of meanings:
(1) Utility-that mass communication has uses for
people;
( 2 ) Intentionality-that mass media use is directed
by prior motivations;
( 3 ) Selectivity- that human behaviour towards the
mass media reflects prior interests and
preferences, and;
(4) Imperviousness- that media audiences, both on the
individual and group levels, do resist unwanted
inflences (Blumler, 1978/41-59).
These explain why, for instance, it is possible,
that a television programme viewed together by many
people could leave different impressions among members
of the viewing audience. Each viewer, depending upon
his or her motives for viewing the programme may focus
on the entertaining aspect of the programme, derive
reinforcement for values and convictions, find potentially
useful information, or experience all of these gratifica-
tions through becoming engaged by the programme. Similarly,
10
each viewer may hold a different opinion of the general
worth of the programme and of the brilliance of the
characters.
No other theoretical framework will better suit
the subject of our investigation.
Our perpective, therefore, will be that viewers'
uses of tele-evangelism programmes and the gratifications
received vary widely in response to a myraid of factors.
Some of these factors are inherent in the medium, others
in the environment and yet others in the socio-psycho-
logical make-up of the audiences.
1.7 - DEFINITION OF TERMS:
1 . Uses and Gratifications: This is the conceptual
framework within which
the present study will
be located. For details
see "Theoretical frame-
work" ( 1 . 6 ) .
This refers to all sponsored
religious programmes on
television aimed at sprea-
ding the gospel and advan-
cing the course of Christ-
ianity.
3. "Electronic Churchf1 : Churches that sponsor tele-
evangelical programmes,
especially the programming
of church service and sermons.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Scientific studies on the audience of tele-
evangelism are thin and scanty. However, from the
general uses and gretifications perspective, there
exists some stock of literature which answer many
questions on the audience of the mass media.
Since Katz (1959,2) fired the first shot, that
I1less attention be paid to what media do to people
and more to what people do with the media", uses
and gratifications researchers have not relented in
their efforts to discover the actual place of media
consumers in the process of mass communication.
Opening an article on "Gratification Seeking,
Media Exposure and Audience Interpretations", Swanson
(19871, said that uses and gratifications research
has made substantial contributions to our understanding
of the mass communication process. He is of the
opinion that "impotant elements and correlates of the
psychological context in which exposure to mass
media occurs have been brought to light by a great
many uses and gratifications studies (P.237).
13
R o s e n g r e e n , W e n n e r a n d P a l m g r e e n ( 1 9 8 5 1 , i n t h e i r
e d i t e d v o l u m e o n t h e s u b j e c t , a r r i v e d a t a c o n c l u s i o n
t h a t u s e s a n d g r a t i f i c a t i o n s r e s e a r c h may h a v e r e a c h e d
a n o t h e r o f t h o s e p o i n t s a t w h i c h s t o c k t a k i n g c a n b e
v a l u a b l e .
And s o f r o m t h e s t o c k p i l e o f l i t e r a t u r e o n u s e s
a n d g r a t i f i c a t i o n s , t h e f o l l o w i n g b r o a d q u e s t i o n s h a v e
b e e n a d d r e s s e d :
1 . Who u s e s t h e mass m e d i a ?
2 . Why?
3 . W i t h w h a t e f f e c t ?
T h e s e q u e s t i o n s c o n s t i t u t e t h e p i v o t o n w h i c h o u r
l i t e r a t u r e r e v i e w w i l l r e v o l v e .
WHO USES THE MASS MEDIA?
M o s t r e s e a r c h e s w h i c h attanpted t o a n s w e r t h e a b o v e
q u e s t i o n w e r e c o n d u c t e d f r o m a r e v e r s e d p e r s p e c t i v e .
T h e y a d d r e s s t h e i s s u e o f who d o e s n o t u s e t h e m e d i a ,
h o p i n g b y i t , p e r h a p s , t o s h e d s u f f i c i e n t l i g h t o n
t h e r e a l q u e s t i o n of who does T h i s may h a v e p r o b a b l y
e m a n a t e d f r o m W e s t e r n p r e s u m p t i o n t h a t t h e v a s t
m a j o r i t y o f p e o p l e d o , i n f a c t u s e t h e m e d i a . S i n c e
i t i s t h e r a r e a n d e x c e p t i o n a l t h a t m a k e b e t t e r n e w s ,
i t was p r o b a b l y t h e smal l n u m b e r who d i d n o t p a t r o n i z e
the mass media that deserved greater attention. One
is tempted to tow this line of argument, especially
when it is realised that the bulk of works on the
topic, if not entirely, was contributed by Western
Scholars.
Gallup, (1930) and Nafzinger, (1930) among their
contemporaries in their early attempts to understand
the phenomenon of media non-use, showed that it is
to be found essentially among people of the lower
socio-economic stratum. There are two basic reasons in
the wisdom of those researches:
1. Lack of resources and cognitive skills due to
low education, and
2. Lack of social contacts and leisure time.
Schramm and White (1949), in their report on
factors affecting newspaper readership, corroborate
the conclusions of earlier studies. They discovered
that in general, readership increases with education,
age and economic status. Let us not forget that these
are the traditional "structural" explanations of media
non-use.
However, the investigations of Okpata (19801,
as well as Burgoon and Burgoon (19801, returned similar
verdicts, but with a little tilt. They point out that
television and probably radio are exceptions; that
television viewership does not drop markedly at old age.
Coming to the domain of religious radio and tele-
vision programmes, which are unique from other forms
of programmes, Johnstone (1971), in his study of the
audience of religious broadcasts in America, discovered
less listening to the broadcasts with increasing
education. He recorded an amazingly steady increase
in the number of respondents who never listened or
watched as education increased. This is in disagree-
ment with the findings of Okpata, and Burgeon and
Burgoon, in their studies on print media reasership.
As for sex, Johnstone Observed no difference in the
frequency of listening to and viewing of religious
radio and television programmes between males and . '
females. This contradicts the traditional observation
that women are more religious than men, as it does
not carry to differential listening to and viewing
of religious radio and television programmes. Be that
as it may, Johnstone concluded that religious programmes
tend to reach those who have already been reached in
the sense of already having formal association with
religions institutions. The old, the church member,
the regular church attender - these comprise the
larger majority of audiences of religious programmes
in the United States.
Buddenbaum (19811, Gaddy (1984), and Abelman's
(1985) studies on viewers of religions television ,
fare in United States ended on a similar note.
They characterised the viewers succintly as demogra-
phically downscale and religious. They are typically
older, poorer, less educated and more likely to be
blue-collar than the average American television
viewer.
In a similar study on the members of the United
State's "electronic church", Gaddy and Pritchard
(19851, identified viewers of religious television
programmes as church members who are more likely to
participate in other religious activities, to be
protestant and evangelical, and to be more conservative
in a wide range of religious beliefs, values and
attitudes. Gaddy and Pritchard agree with Buddenbaum
and Johnstone, who found the same demographic and
psychographic characteristics among viewers of tele-
evangelism programmes.
On their own part, Barry and Smythe (19551, in
their early study of the appropriateness of a uses
and gratifications approach to religious broadcasting
and its audience, held that "there are logical reasons
for listening or non-listening and viewing or non-
viewing that go deep into the personal and social
situations of audience members, far deeper than their
simple identification with Catholics or Presbyterians,
or non-participants in any church" (P.408).
WHY DO PEOPLE USE THE MASS MEDIA?
Current answers to this research question constitute
a major pillar on which television uses and gratifica-
tions' paradigm rests. They provide the basis for
a decisive break between the uses and gratifications
perspective and the fossilised and discredited "Effects"
theory of old. This is because they suggest a high
level deliberateness or purposiveness on the part of
the individual recipient of television fare, a quality
which the effect theory traditionally downplays. The
uses and gratifications perspective suggests the
existence of an "active audience" as opposed to a
"passive audience".
In an early scholarly attempt to profer an answer
to the question, Schramm (19491, observed that i n d i v i w - - -
select news in expectation of reward. Those antici-
pated rewards or their actual derivation are founded
on the individuals socio-psychological and material
needs which, in turn, derive from the immediate
situation in which he finds himself. To Schramm,
therefore, the most fundamental consideration in the
selection of medial fare is for what gives one the
most reward immediate or delayed. Also, there seems
to be greater expectation of reward when there is
greater possibility of the audience member identifying
with the fare (P.265).
This theoretical model which sees gratifications
received as being directed by gratifications sought
is countered by the result of Mcleod, Bybee and Duralls
(19821, research in exposure to radio programmes in
Jamaica. They found gratifications received from
the programmes to be largelyanaccidental result of
media exposure.
Rubin and Pearse (1987, posit two main set of
reasons why people attend to the media. These are:
1. Ritualized/non-serious r e a s o n s m e d i a use out
of habit and for pass time purposes.
2. Instrumental/serious reasons by which they mean
the intentional and selective use of the media
for specific ends such as excitement and profes-
sional information.
Freedman and Sears (19651, merely put the same
idea differently when, in their exposition of the
concept of Selective Exposure, observed that "it
seems likely that the greater the perceived utility
of information, the greater will be the desire to be
exposed to it. ... Conversely, information content,
programme types or even entire media sources not
perceived to be useful are bracketed out1'.
Carlson (1960), on his part, observed that many
paople may attend to one media fare for several
reasons. Drawing from experience, he said the
individual is able to perceive that a body of media
far is in some way relevant to his underlying goals
and values. It is the relevance that is perceived
and the satisfaction that dictates the interest that
will be attached to the fare (gratifications sought
determine exposure to media fare).
In a manner, somehow, like Rubin and Pearse,
Berelson (1954), furnished a list of reasons why
people pay heed to the media. According to him, this
includes the need for information and interpretation,
escape from tension, practical assistance to living
and general vicarious benefits.
Atkin (19721, in his study of the utilitarian
underpining of mass media use, showed that the
anticipated conversational usefulness of media fare
for future interaction with family, friends and other
acquaintances, may combine with other interpersonal
factors to provide a strong motivation for mass
media audience . .
Information for future interaction is a means to
ego retaining and ego boosting. It arms the audience
member who seeks and obtains it with the assurance
that he/she is still relevant within the vital social
brackets. It also serves to increase his/her prestige
among the people with whom the information is ultimately
shared.
One of the most comprehensive analyses of viewers
of religious television programmes was conducted as
a joint effort between the Annenberg School of Commu-
nication and the Gallup Organisation in America
(Gerbner, et al, 1984). Although a bulk of the
research was more concerned with how religious television
cultivated viewer's attitudes and perceptions, it does
offer some insight i,nto viewers motives. In that
study which was a national survey, 14% of the parti-
cipants claimed that viewing religious programmes
was a substitute for going to church. More than
half (52%) noted they viewed for preaching or sermons
and more than a third watched as a result of "feeling
close to God1', "having your spirit lifted", and the
music heard on the programmes.
Gerbner, et a1 (19841, more importantly, in a
related study found that religious programmes were
substitutes for watching secular programmes. The same
survey also found that dissatisfaction with prevailing
moral standards and practices, as dipicted in non-
religious television fare was "one of the most distinctive
bonds between religious programmes and their viewers"
(P.66).
Abelman ( 1 9 8 7 1 , in his study of religious television
uses and gratifications in selected American communi-
nities, further considered the interrelated nature
of television user motives and the relationship among
viewing motives and patterns. Respondents indicated
their agreement with each of 22 statement of motives
for watching religious programmes. Abelman discovered
the following motives for viewing the programmes.
information/learning; spiritual guidance; entertainment; - feeling close to God; pass time: arousal/excitement;
salvation ; habit; escape/forget; topic for communi-
cation/discussion; behavioural guidance; relaxation;
replacement for church attendance; and social interaction.
For patterns of viewing motives Abelman, inter-
correlated the items and conducted a principal factor
analysis with oblique rotation and identified six
factors for patterns of viewing motives, namely:
Reactionary, information; entertainment; faith: habit; -
and escape. The investigation lent further support
to the interrelatedness of television use motives;
the identification of instrumental and ritualised
patterns in how television is used and the generali-
sability of these patterns to a unique and alternative
form of programming.
As with previously cited investigations on television
similar patterns of association were evident for
ritualised and instrumental viewing. He held that
the habitual and information viewing motivation factors
were associated significantly with using religious
programmes as a vehicle for entertainment escape and ,_ r '
as an expression of faith. In the same vein, he
observed that reactionary vieweing was related to
watching religious programmes for entertainment,
escape and faith. Faith - inspired viewing also was
raleted to watching for entertainment, out of habit,
for information, for escape and as a reaction to
secular programmes. For Abelman, the strongest viewing
motivation correlations were between habit and both
escape and viewing out of faith.
Rubin (1983, 19841, who investigated the viewing
of secular programmes, noted that many regular viewers
of religious programmes appear to be purposeful and
selective information seekers.
Fore (1979); Gaddy and Pritchard (19851, identified
the type of consumer of religious programmes discovered
by Rubin, as having some implications "regarding the
long-standing concern that the "electronic church"
has usurped congregational attendance in the living
church. This concern was substantiated by Gerbner,
et al. (19841, who reported in their research findings
that 14% of their respondents claimed they substituted
church attendance for viewing religous programmes.
WITH WHAT EFFECTS?
The view of contemporary communications scholarship
is that the audience of mass mediated communication
is not a defenceless and robotic target at the mercy
of message he encounters from the mass media. On the
contrary, he is an active participant in the communi-
cation process, choosing which messages to attend to,
interpreting them in terms of his non frame of reference,
responding to them as his own needs, values, desires,
capabilities and opportunities dictate and allow.
For Elemeuwa (1990), the recipient who had always
been viewed as an uncritical consumer of the content
of mass communication has now come to be identified
as an active participant in the process of reception.
A binding premise of this consideration anchors on
the fact that the recipient of certain television
programmes is "subjectively" attached to those
programmes. that means he "suitably" translates the
contents of those programmes and makes use of them
according to his personal needs and desires.
Teichert (1975, 270), in this regard, described
the reception of mass mdhted message as the "conduit
pipe between the specific interest and orientations
of the individual and the circumstances prevailing
in his environment",
Katz, with Blumler (1974, 19-32), confirmed the
motivational factors determining media use in the
following words. "In the mass communication
process, much initiative in linking need gratification
and media choice has with the audience membertt. in
this regard, some characteristic features have been
envisaged for the "active public" as stated bellow:
The public of mass communication is perceived as
an active element in the process of mass communication
and not as a mere passive recipient. In contrast,
media use must be seen as an active, intentional
social action.
The intendedness of the action of the recipient
does not just result from existing predispositions
such as attitudes and certain normative expectations,
but is explicable from the nature of the specific
needs, i.e. the mass media and their contents represent
an avenue for the satisfaction of personal needs.
The mass media represent a possibility for the
satisfaction of needs in competition with the other
instances of gratification eg, primary groups, i.e.
media use represents only one in many possible
alternatives which are potentially functionally
equivaleht.
Elemeuwa (P. 3051 was more vehement when he said
that from our experiences so far, the concept of
"uses approach" seeks to reduce the rather naive
-. illusion that,exlsts a rigid connection between content
of mass mediated message and its meaning for the
recipient.
Teichert (P.4391, has demonstrated clearly that
almost every content of a particular mass medium could
randomly be put to use according to the personal needs
of the recipient.
Kelman, set out to provide an answer to the question.
What are the processes that underlie opinion formation
and change? Kelman (19611, conceptualised opinion
formation and change in terms of three qualitatively
different social influence processes to wit.
'a. Compliance
b. Indentification, and
c. Internalisation.
He observed that different situations (both with
the message and in the physical environment) and
different psychological factors within audience members
27 9 m
lead to different a,ttention to various message
components, hence to different modes of information
processing and opinion change. He further held that
whichever process that actually operates - compliance,
identification or internalisation - is all a
function of the receiver's level of confidence in his
information on a given issue.
These findings are in many ways, in agreement with
the conclusions of Horland, Lumsdain and sheffield
(19491, who investigated the effects of presenting
a one - sided argument when attempting to engender
opnion change on a controversial subject. They found
that:
For individuals initially opposed to the point
of view being presented, presenting the argument
on both sides were.more effective,
For those who were initially convinced of the
point of view being presented, however, the
inclusion of argument on both sides was less
effective,
3. Better educated persons were more favourably
affected by presentation of both sides, while
poorly educated person were more affected by
communication which used only supportive argument.
A common strand running through these findings
is that the effectiveness of media messages varies
in response to char6cteristics of the message and its
audiences.
In a near duplication of the thematic and methodo-
logical thrusts of the work of Hovland et al, Collins
and Zimmerman (1975) sought to compare the impact of
consistently negative cues with that of mixed negetive
and positive cues about a televised aggressor's motives
and the consequences on children. Results showed that
children who viewed the version with mixed cues were
significantly more aggresive than those who viewed
the consistently negetive cues.
This finding concurs with that of Hovland, et al,
that two-sided presentations of views are generally
more effective on human audiences than one-sided
presentations.
Berelson, Lazarsfield and Mcphee (19541, in their
study of the role of mass media in the political
process, provocatively asserted thst "the more that
voters exposed themselves to the (political) campaign . . . but still, the less likely they were to change their
positions".
On his part, Krugman ( 1 9 6 5 ) investigated the impact
of television advertising among a wide range of media
fare. Although his was a well-informed work,
nevertheless, it was an opinionated piece. He observed
that members of the public easily change their ways
of perceiving products and brands as well as their
purchasing behaviour without thinking about it. In
conclusion, Krdgman submitted that the information
content of television commercials are effective because
commercials often deal with topics that are not
involving enough to activate attitudinal defences.
This is almost antithetical to the finding of Berelson,
Lazarsfield and Mcphee.
Indeed, the uses and gratifications approach to
the study of mass communication process has actually
been belaboured. One cannot but agree with Swamson's
position that uses and gratifications research has
made enormous contributions to our understanding of
the mass communication process.
CHAPTER THREE
3.0. METHODOLOGY
The data presented in this report were collected
during 25 days of field work by the researcher. The
questionnaireadministration (distribution and collection)
started on Thursday, October 9, 1997 and ended on
Saturday, November 1 , 1997.
3.1 METHOD OF STUDY
Survey research, according to Osuala (1987:180)
studies both large and small populations by selecting
and studying samples chosen from the population bo
discover the relative incidence, distribution and
interrelations of sociological and psychological
variables. This study is an audience research which
involves television viewing patterns, television
affinity, programme preferences, and television
viewing motives.
Survey research has many advantages. Tuckman
(19871, states that questionnaires are used by researchers
to convert data into information directly given by a
person. By providing access to what is inside a person's
head, this approach makes it possible to measure what
a person knows, what a person likes or dislikes and
3 1
what a person thinks. Therefore, the most appropriate
method for this study is the survey research method.
3.2 POPULATION OF STUDY
The population for this study was drawn from the
Lagos metropolis. The decision was guided by the fact
. that the city has ten television stations and a high
concentration of receivers. In addition to that, most
of the tele-evangelists live and operate the "electronic *
churchesl'either in the city or within its immidiate
environs.
The population comprised Lagosians ranging (in age)
from 20 years and above, who either own television sets
or have regular access to one. Respondents from this
universe were drawn from three areas of the city namely:
Ikoyi, Yaba and Ajegunle. The reason was far fair
representativeness. Ikoyi area, which is exclusively
inhabited by the super-rich represented the rich;
Yaba which is occupied by the middle class, represented
those in the middle stratum of the social ladder and
Ajegunle, a shanty town in the city, represented the
poor.
3.3 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING PROCEDURE
A sample of 180 respondents was randomly selected
through a zig-zag movement from the first three streets
off a major bus-stop in each of the three sections of
the city. The bus-stop were Falomo bus-stop in Ikoyi,
Alagomeji bus-stop in Yaba and Awodiora bus-stop in
Ajegunle. The zig-zag movement involved every alternate
compound until a sample of 20 was drawn from each street.
This gave a sample of 60 from each of the three areas
of the city.
3.4 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
Data for this study were collected by the use of
questionnaire containing measures of television viewing
patterns - including television affinity and:)programme
preferences - and television viewing motives as well
as gratifications obtained. The questionnaire was
personally administered by the reseacher. The sample
questionnaire used for the study embodies in this work
as Appendix I.
3.5 METHOD OF DATA ANALYSES
The data collected (to be taken up in chapter four)
are analysed and presented using simple percentages and
tabulations. The percentages are used to further
describe the absolute numbers.
The tables make understanding of the data position
at a glance possible and the discussions on the findings
are based on this statistical presentation.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSES
Of the 180 questionnaires distributed, 162 were *
returned. This represents a 90% return rate. This
was possible because the researcher himself administered
them and concious effort was made to ensure that they
were returned. Yaba area recorded the highest returns
of 58 ( 3 2 % ) while Ajegunle area came close to it with
54 ( 3 0 % ) . The least returns of 5 0 , which are not far
from the number from the second area, came from Ikoyi
and represents 27 .8%. See Table 1 .
Table 1 : Questionnaire Return Rate
Number
Total Number Returned 1 1 90 .0
Percentage
Total Number Distributed
Total Number Unreturned
Ikoyi
Yaba
I I
180
18
50
58
100 .0
1 0 . 0
27 .8
3 2 . 2
4 . 1 General Results
Before attempting to answer the research questions,
information obtained from Part One of the questionnaire *
will be explained first.
For gender, 5 9 . 9 % are male, whiae the remaining
4 0 . 1 % are female (see Table 2 ) .
A majority of the respondents fall within the age
bracket of 2 0 - 3 0 years, while next in number are of
the 3 1 - 4 0 years range. The smallest number came from
those ranging from 5 1 and above. They traibed behind
in a distant position.
A clear pattern which emerged is that the hower
the age range, the higher the number of respondents.
See Table 3 .
Table 2 : Respondents9Sex
Sex
Male
Female
Total
Number
9 7
6 5
1 6 2
Percentage
5 9 . 9
4 0 . 1
1 0 0 . 0
T a b l e 3 : ~ e s p o n d e n t s ~ ~ g e B r a c k e t
T o t a l 1 1 6 2 1 1 0 0 . 0
Age Range
20 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - a b o v e
On r e s p o n d e n t s ' r e l i g i o n s , mos t o f them a r e I
C h r i s t i a n s ( T a b l e 4 ) . A d h e r a n t s o f o t h e r r e l i g i o n s
Number
8 1
52
20
9
c o n s t i t u t e d o n l y 9 . 3 % o f t h e t o t a l number o f v i e w e r s .
P e r c e n t a g e
5 0 . 0
3 2 . 1
1 2 . 4
5 . 6
T a b l e 4 : ~ e s p o n d e n t s ' R e l i ~ i o n
C h r i s t i a n i t y
R e l i g i o n
A b r e a k down of c h r i s t i a n v i e w e r s i n t o d e n o m i n a t i o n s
( T a b l e 5 1 , shows t h a t mos t o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s a r e
P e n t e c o s t a l i a n s ( 6 8 % ) .
Number o f R e s p o n d e n t s
O t h e r s
T o t a l
P e r c e n t a g e
1 5
1 6 2
9 . 3
1 0 0 . 0
Table 5 : A Breakdown of Christian Denominational
Viewers
Total I 1 4 7 I 1 0 0 . 0
Denomination Number of Respondents
Roman Catholic 22
Protestant 25
Pentecostal
This may mean that most Lagos Christians are
affiliated to the fundamentalist Pentecostal denominations.
Percentage -
1 5 . 0
1 6 . 0
6 8 . 0
As a matter of fact, Lagos has been described as a
Pentecostal stronghold in the country and this may
explain the current outburst in teke-evangelism viewing.
This concludes the analyses of the demographic data
collected on the respondents. We now begin the presen-
tation and analyses of data gathered to address the
Research Questions. The data relating to each Research
Question are presented and contextually analysed separa-
tely and capped by any pertinent observations and/or
conclusions.
4.2 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSES OF DATA ON
RESEARCH QUESTIONS.
Research Question 1:
Who Views Tele-Evangelism Programmes?
All the respondents indicates that they view tele-
evangelisl programmes. It is interesting to discover
that even non-christians view tele-evangelism too
See Table 6..
Table 6 : Respondents Who View Tele-Evangelism
Programmes.
Although almost every respondent views tele-evangelism,
respondents view the programmes at different frequencies.
See Table 7.
Percentage
100.0
0 . 0
1.00 .O
Response
Yes
No
Total
Number of Respondents
162
0
162
Table 7 : General Frequency of Viewing Tele-Evangelism
Programmes.
Frequency
Of ten
Occasional
Seldom
Never
Not Ascertained
Total
Number of Respondents-
82
5 0
2 0
3
7
Percentage
5 0 . 6
The data show that those who often view the
programmes are in a majority; they are followed by
occasional viewers ( 3 0 . 9 % ) . Twenty respondents seldomly
view. A small proportion of 1.9% said they never viewed
even though they own or have regular access to television
sets. It must noted that they had earlier claimed they
view the programmes. The data are of interest as they
stand, probably of considerable interest to those who
may have thought that few people view religious programmes.
To find that almost 81% of respondents view religions
programmes "often" or 'foccasionall~" seems to be a
significant finding and in absolute terms the proportion
is clearly high.
Informative as' the summary data may be, however,
it will be more instructive to identify the viewers.
Who are those people?
In answer to this question, the researcher looked
for significant differences among viewers along some
important control dimensions, such as denominational
affiliation and degree of religious commitment and
interest, as well as the frequency of church attendance.
These differences are found in other parts of this work.
Therefore, in answer to kesearch Question One,
"Who Views Tele-Evangelism Programmes", the findings
show that a significant majority of Nigerians view
tele-evangelism programmes. Furthermore, most of them
view both often and occasionally.
Resear Question 2:
Why Do People View Tele-Evangelism Programes?
In response to this Research Question, respondents
indicated their agreement with each of the 10 statements
of motives for viewing tele-evangelism programmes. The
data show that respondents view the programmes for
diverse reasons. See Table 8.
Table 8 : Tele-Evangelism Viewing Motives
Salvation
Closeness to God
Growth in Christian Faith
Spiritual Guide
Behavioural Guide
Entertainment
Pass Time
Relaxation
Habit
Excitement
Viewing Motives
Most viewers (90.7%) however, view for spiritual
reasons. No one seems to watch tele-evangelism programmes
as an entertainment. The remaining number of viewers
is shared equally among pass time, relaxation, habit of
watching and "no reason". Thus, tele-evangelists, there-
fore, seem to be succeeding in their endeavour.
Number of Respondents
No Reason
Total
Percentage
3
162
1.8
100
Theoretically, one would expect that more frequent
church attendance would more likely produce at least
frequent tele-evangelism programme viewing because they
are presumably more "religious" or at least more likely
to support what the religious institutions sponsor.!
Those who attend church frequently are likely to be
respondents who view the programmes both often and very
often. See Table 9 .
Table 9 : Frequency of Church Attendance
Never 1 7 1 4 . 3
Frequency
Very Often
Of ten
Occassional
Seldom
Total 1 1 6 2 1 1 0 0
The data in Table 9 show that 1 3 . 6 % of the respon-
dents attend church service occassionally and 4 . 3 % never
attend. These are the non-christians, and they are those
who seldomly view tele-evangelism programmes.
Number of Respondent
1 0 4
2 9
2 2
0
Percentage
6 4 . 2
1 7 . 9
1 3 . 6
0 . 0
On the question of satisfaction derived from tele-
evangelism programme viewing, a great majority of the
respondents (93.2%) indicated they derived religious
satisfaction in one form or another, as opposed to mere
entertainment or "no benefit" at all (6.8%). The fact
that 93.2% of respondents derived diverse religious or
spiritual benefit from viewing the programmes shows that
tele-evangelists are succeeding in their operation.
See Table 10.
Table 10 : Benefit Derived from Viewing Tele-Evagelism
Programmes.
I Religious satisfacti n P 151
Benefit I Number of Respondent
Mere Entertainment or I
Percentage
"No benefit" At All
Research Question 3:
1 1 6.8
Total
What kind of Tele-Evangelism Programmes Do Viewers
Prefer?
Although most tele-evangelism programmes consist
- 162
of fire-and-brimestone sermons, it is necessary to find
100.0
out viewers' favourite tele-evangelism programmes. The
data in Table 11, below, may provide a clue to the true
positions of the various tele-evangelism programmes.
L A 4 4
Table 1 1 : Tele-Evangelism Pro~ramme Preferences
Sermon I 7 9 I 48.8
Type of Programme
Televised Church Service
Gospel Music 1 36 1 2 2 . 2
Number of Respondent
18
Christian Drama/Soap opeba 1 4 I 8.6
Percentage
1 1 . 1
Christian Talk Show I l 1 6.8
From the data, most viewers (48.8%) prefer sermons.
Sermon is followed by Gospel Music, televised church
2.5 Not Ascertained
Total
service and Christian Drama/Soap Opera. The least
prefered of all tele-evangelism programmes is Christian
Talk Show with 6.8%. The 2.5% of respondents who could
4
not ascertain their preference could be among those who
- 162
seldom view tele-evangelism programme.
100.0
Research Question 4 :
What Do Viewers Do With The Content of Tele-Evangelism
Programmes?
To answer this Research Question, the research tried
to find (1) the number of tele-evangelism converts to
Christianity; (2) those who changed from one church to
another as a result of the programmes; (3) those who would
prefer tele-evangeli,sm programme viewing to church
attendance on Sundays; and ( 4 ) respondents' views on
replacing church attendance with the "electronic church".
He also looked at viewers' responses to the constant
clarion call by tele-evangelists to contribute financially
to help fund the expensive cost of programme production
and airtime.
The data in Table 1 2 show that a small number of
three ( 2 % ) respondents were converted to christianity
through tele-evangelism. An overwhelming majority of
viewers (98%) are not converts of tele-evangelism. In
this regard, tele-evangelism appears to have failed
perhaps in one of its cardinal objectives However, this
conclusion must be guarded with caution bearing in mind
that the study design for this work did not provide for
an examination of the hierarchy of the objectives of
tele-evangelism. See Table 1 2 .
Table 1 2 : Respondents Converted to Christianity Through
Tele-Evangelism.
Response ! Frequency ! Percentage
Total I 1 4 7 I 100.0
For respondents who changed denomination through
tele-evangelism, the figures in Table 13 show that very
few respondents did change churches due to tele-evangelism
programme viewing.
Table 13 : Respondents Who Changed Denominations Through
Tele-Evangelism
11
No
100.0 Total
Table 13 suggests that viewers of religious televison
fare do not seem to always respond to the tele-evangelists1
call to viewers to join either their churches or other
"living" churches.
On the preferability of viewing tele-evangelism
programmes to church attendance on Sundays, a significant
majority ( 8 6 . 4 % ) of respondents indicated that they
cannot prefer viewing tele-evangelism programmes to
church attendance on Sundays. (See Table 1 4 ) .
Table 1 4 : Preference of Tele-Evangelism Programmes
to Church Attendance on Sundys
It is one thing to prefer viewing teBe-evangelism
programmes to church attendance, it is something else
for the programmes to be effective enough to actually
Percentage
4 . 8
8 . 8
4 2 . 9
4 3 . 5
1 0 0 . 0
Response
Strongly Prefer
Prefer
Diaspprove
Strongly Disapprove
Total
replace church attendance. For the degree of effectiveness
Frequency
7
1 3
6 3
6 4
1 4 7
of the programmes for the replacement of church attendance,
see Table 1 5 .
Table 1 5 : Effectiveness of Tele-Evangelism Programmes
To Replace Church Attendance
Effectiveness
Very Effective
Fairly Effective
Frequenc y ~er;;;;age
2 2
Effective
Not Effective I 4 9 3 0 . 3
1 8 1 1 . 1
Very Ineffective
Total
2 9
1 6 2
1 7 . 9
1 0 0 . 0
The figures in Table 1 5 show almost an even split
between respondents who see tele-evangelism programmes
as effective enough to replace church attendance and
those who do not. Note that the 1 6 2 respondents include
15 people who are non-christians.
Coming to the question of whether viewers heed the
tele-evangelists1 call to join such organisations as
"Dominion Partners", "Tillers Behind Ministries", etc.,
whose function is to contribute financially to help
sponsor the programmes, Table 1 6 provides an insight.
Table 1 6 : Viewersf Responses To Call for Monetory
Contribution To Help Sponsor Tele-Evangelism Programmes.
Percentage
2 6 . 5
7 3 . 5
1 0 0 . 0
Respondent
Those who have
Contributed
Tnose who have Never
Contributed
Total
Frequency
4 3
1 1 9
1 6 2
Table 17 : Respondents1 Reasons For Failing To
Contribute
Reason I Frequency I P e r c e n t a ~
Do not have enough money
Do not consider it necessary
Tele-Evangelists are Fraudsters 1 4 1 3 . 5
Tele-Evangelism is a Waste of money 4 I 3.5
Inadequate information on how to
contribute
Total 119 ) 100.0 -
No Reason
As seen in Table 18, 44.4% of the respondents
would have contributed but they do not have enough money,
I 18
while 11.8% indicated their willingness to contribute
15.1
but for problem of how to send the money to the tele-
Evangelits. About 25.5% have not contributed because,
in their own opinions, the tele-evangelists are fraudsters
and are difficult to believe because of their flambouyant
life-styles. Among this category of respondents are
a few who do not believe in evangelism at all, so they
do not support what the 'lelectronic churches" sponsor.
The over all figures are significant because they show
that viewers take the contents of tele-evangelism programmes
seriously, not as sitting ducks or mere persive viewers.
Research Question 5 :
To What Extent Do Tele-Evangelism Programmes Affect
viewer$ Life Spiritually?
Item 22 (a and b) in the questionnaire addressed d
this Research Question. Levels of respondes ranges
affect from "very strongly my Lifet1 to "Do Not Affect my Lifett. !' The data show that 8 3 . 4 % of the respondents are affected
spiritually by tele-evangelism, while 16.7% are not . i
affected by the programmes. This finding is significant
because it shows that tele-evangelism is highly effective.
See Table 18.
Table 18 : Extent To Which Tele-Evangelism Programmes
Affect Respondents' Lives
Percentage
3 1 . 5
51.9
14.2
2 . 5
100 .0
Degree of Affectation I Frequency
Very strongly affect my Life
Strongly affect my Life
Hardly affect my Life
Do not affect my Life
9 1
8 4
2 3
4
'Total I 162
Most effects of tele-evangelism fall within the
reinforcement category. By this is meant that tele-
evangelism reinforces existing dispositions. This
supports an earlier finding in this work that tele-
evangelism programmes tend to reach mostly those who
have already been reached with the gospel of Jesus
Christ. For example, this is further borne out by
the data shown in Table 1 9 .
Table 1 9 : Kinds of Effects of Tele-Evangelism
Programmes on Viewers
Reinforcement of christian
commitment
Reinforement of faith
Percentage
6 . 7
2 . 4
Kinds of Effect
Got converted to christianity
through the programmes
Reinforcement of moral mindedness
Other ways
Frequency
1 1
Got "Born Again" I 4
No effect at all
Total
- 4 3
1 6 2
The Table shows that 6 6 . 7 % of the respondents received
diverse spiritual effects, while 2 6 . 5 % ( 4 3 ) claim
tele-evangelism programmes have not recorded any kind
of effect upon them. Eleven or 6 . 8 % received other
kinds of effects. That 43 ( 2 6 . 5 % ) respondents do not
receive any kind of effects seems to suggest tele-
evangelism is fairly weak in this aspect.
This concludes the analyses of data pertaining to
the Research Questions formulated to guide this work.
A general discussion of findings now follows.
4.3 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
It is assumed that the sample is truly representa- . tive of the population which can be used to draw
inference on the country as a whole. All members of
the sample had access to the same television stations,
meaning that every respondent described the same
phenomenon in the responses given.
From the research result, it has been established
that a majority of Nigerians who have access to
television sets view tele-evangelism programmes.
This investigation lends support to the inter-
relatedness of television use motives, the identification
of instrumental and ritualised patterns in how television
is used and the generalisability of these patterns to
tele-evangelism which is a unique form of programming.
As with secular programmes viewing (see e.g, Rubin, 1983,
19841, many regular viewers of religious programmes
appear to be purposeful and selective information
seekers. Instrumental use of tele-evangelism programmes
typically reflects the viewing of informational
programming, which includes progammes that have adopted
secular formats (e.g. talk shows, drama/Soap Opera) and
programmes indigenous to religious broadcasting, such
as sermons and televised church service.
Ritualised television use is also apparant among
viewers of tele-evangelism programmes,with some
interesting deviations in the motives that are reflected
in this form of viewing. As has been suggested in the
literature review, ritualised television use encompasses
the habitual nature of using the medium itself and
reflects a strong association with the medium. In
this study of tele-evangelism programme viewers, a
strong religious belief was associated with ritualised
viewing as well.
Tele-evangelists' faith in the power of televison
to surmount cultural barriers to wold-wide evangelisation
is supported by the result of this research. Data shown
in Table 7 inform us that 50% of respondents view
often while 30.9% view occasionally. This finding
is of considerable interest perticularly to those who
may have thought that nobody or few people view tele-
evangelism programmes. Nevertheless, most regular viewers
are Pentecostalians who have already been reached through
other ways, with the content of these programmes. This,
may leave much to be desired by tele-evangelists whose
principal target audiences may be the uninitiated in
pentecostalism and adherants of other religions and
christian denominations such as the Roman Catholics.
That this set of viewers are clustered near the
other end of the continuum of the least consumers of
tele-evangelism fare, shows that viewers are highly
selective in their exposure to media fare. Most
of them will expose themselves to information that
corroborate their convictions or dispositions. They
do resist unwanted influences. This is consistent with
the findings of all uses and gratifications researchers
(Blumler, 1978:41-59) and explains why only 8% of
Roman Catholics view often, 10% of Muslims often view
too and no adherants of any other religion ever view
often or occasionally.
For the faithful viewers, their expectations were
diversely fulfilled. Such benefits as deep knowledge
of God, increase in faith, closeness to God and ;
spiritual satisfaction were derived by 93.2% of them.
This is a resounding success for tele-evangelists.
The preference of sermon (48.8% of the respondents)
to other tele-evangelism programmes is also consistent
with the judgement of tele-evangelists whose programming
consists of 80% sermon and televised church service.
For religious fare to continue to attract high audience,
most of the programmes must continue to be sermons.
Talk show, the least prefered, having just 1 1 out of
162 respondents is not quite attractive to viewers.
Although the Gratification sought - Gratification
obtained paradigm as seen by Greenberg (1974) does not
employ any methodology that can be used to distinguish
whether the responses obtained are accurate statements
of what was wanted or what is thought to have been
obtained, this research has shown that for tele-
evangelism programmes, most gratifications sought can
be obtained because of the highly religious nature of
the messages.
Lometti et al. (1977) did note that the exact
relationship between gratification sought and actual
gratification has not yet been investigated because,
as Palmgreen et al, (1981) put it, such findings are
both preliminary and tentative. Be that as it may, 2
this investigation shows that most gratifications
received from tele-evangelism are in the area of
reinforcement of already held positions. The conversion
of only 6.8% of the respondents in this investigation,
to christianity through tele-evangelism, shows it is
not among the most effective ways of winning souls
for the Kingdom of God. Indeed, some respondents
indicated in some open-ended questionnaire items that *
from their experience the most effective way to win
converts is through face-to-face evangelism. Religion
C has a great command on people's psycology and that
1\
is why potential converts need strong and constant
persuation. Such persua5ion has to be dialogical -
a two-way exchange of ideas. This type of communication
can not be easily provided through the mass media.
Mass media messages are know to be most effective at
the stage of awareness about a new idea.. Rogers and
shoemaker ( 1 9 7 1 ) did posit this idea in their study of
radio for development communication in third world
countries.
Finally, on uses and gratification realm, the
findings of this research is in line with some of the
basic assumptions. The conjecture that the audience
is active and goal oriented was upheld. Another
supposition upheld is that which says that audience
espectations act as intervening variables in the
process of effects explaining the necessary tentative
nature of effects. The finding confirm , that people
will mostly expose themselves to information that are
in line with their convinctions.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
5.1 SUMMARY
Although most, if not all, televison stations
throughout the country are involved in extensive
religious broadcasts, and although countless religious
groups and tele-evangelists package, sponsor and
encourage such programmes, very little is known about
who view the programmes, how often they view, why they
view and what they do with the contentsof the programmes,
as well as the extent of the impact of the programmes
on their lives, spiritually or otherwise. This research
work was designed to study the uses and gratifications
of tele-evangelism in Nigeria. As can be seen throughout
the pages of this work, television is, and will remain
for a long time to come, one of the most pervasive media
of mass communication.
As tele-evangelists and the "electronic churches"
face the task of communicating to the people the
gospel of Jesus Christ, they will inevitably consider
how best to exploit the vast potentials of television
to improve upon their current operation.
This work has attempted to provide an exploratory
overview of how Nigerians use the prevalent tele-
evangelism programmes by evidence - d
from the research sample.
With five research questions charting the course
of the investigation, the study explored television
viewing patterns - including television affinity,
programme preference, viewing motives and the extent
to which the programmes impact on viewerg lives
spiritually and otherwise.
The population was made up of Lagosians ranging in
age from 20 years and above, and through careful purposive
random sampling, 180 respondents were chosen. The
ques tionnairs return rate was appreciably high -90%. i
The research findings were far from what Nigerians
think of the phenomenon as expressed in the pages of
newspapers and magazines. The findings indicate that
almost every adult Nigerian, who has access to a
television set, views tele-evangelism programmes, but
at a different viewing frequencies and for different
reasons, too. It is very clear from the data that most
regular viewers are people who are already firmly and
fairly attached to pentecostal churches. Very few
viewers actually got converted through the programmes.
Rather, the most extensive impact of tele-evangelism,
is the reinforcement of already held beliefs and
convinctions.
Many view the programmes for purely religious
reasons, while a few view for reasons other than that
intended by the "electronic churches". For those who
viewed for religious reasons, they were gratified U
accordingly.
5.2 CONCLUSION -
The result of this study illustrates that many or
numerous social and psychological factors, intertwined
in complex but coherent ways, act in concert to
influence tele-evangelism usage and consuption. Those e
who are firmly in support of the content of the programmes
(pentecostalians) are the heaviest consumers, while
those who are somehow opposed or indiferent to the
programmes also view but more seldom. This may mean
that tele-evangelism is countering cultural, political
and other obstacles which, otherwise, would have been
easy to surmount. One of the most prominent tele-
evangelists did assert in one of the programmes that:
It is our duty .to commit all our resources,
both human and material, to tell the world
about Christ, but it is God's work to touch
their hearts and get them convinced.
If that be the case, then tele-evangelism in Nigeria < fi p+/ -
is neither a failure, like most media campaigns in the C nn,
country, nor a misappropriation of the scarce resources
of the church as some argue including those (tele-
evangelists) who are struggling to attain the mark of
their high calling - preaching the gospel to every
creature until the end of the ages.
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS
These are directed to tele-evangelists, broadcasters
and communication scholars.
To the tele-evangelist, the basic question to ask
before packaging a programme is "how do I present my
message in order to make the desired impact?" Whether
the programme is for reinforcement of faith or conversion
to christianity, it should go with enough background.
Tele-evangelists should read wide and conduct mini
researches to know what actually the audience needs and
then aim at meeting these needs through the resources
of the gospel. Our tele-evangelists should de-emphasize
dwelling almost exclusively on biblical cases, which
may seen antiquated and fossilised to the uninitiated, -1Y
and endeavour to interprete the scriptures increasingly
in the light of the people's concrete existential
situation in life. Sound education has a part to play
here. It is for this reason that tele-evangelists like
Tunde Bakare and Mathew Ashimolowo have distinguished
themselves, and now have wide audience. They give
high contemporary human angle to their programmes. They
are quite knowledgeable in biblical exergesis and
haemeneutics - the science of application of
scriptures to contemporary situations.
Again, since funding is a major problem to the
"electronic churchestt, adequate information should be
given to viewers as to how they can contribute
financially, in response to calls for help. The
research findings show that many are willing to
contribute (even if it is peanut) towards sponsoring
the programmes.
This reseacher scanned the libraries of one of the
top - flight Universities (U.N.N.) without finding any
previous work related to this research topic. It is,
therefore, recommended that further studies on religious
television fare be undertaken. Due to the obvious
limitations of the,present work, it is advised that
scholars undertake modified replications or extentions
of tele-evangelism (uses and gratifications) studies,
to refine methodology, and to comparatively analyse
the findings of separate investigations.
For further research too, it would be good to
study ways in which the pervasive power of television
can be put to better use to boost world-wide evangelisa-
tion. This, however, must be done within the confines
of the code of the National Broadcasting Commission
(NBC) on religious broadcast in the country.
REFERENCE LIST
BOOKS
arry, W.D. and Smythe, W. The T Audience and Religion. New 1955. P.401-8
elevisi York :
on -Radio Harper,
Blumler, J.G. "The Social Characters of Mass Media Gratifications" In K.D. Rosengree et al. (eds) Media Gratifications Research : Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills : Sage 1985
Berelson, B.R.; Lazarsfield P.F. and McPhee, W.N. "Political Process : The Role of the Mass Mediaft. In W. Schramm and D. Roberts (eds), The Process and Effects of Mass Communication Revised Edition, Urbana : University of Illinois Press, 1971, PP. 655-677.
Elemeuwa, J.K. The Uses and Gratifications Approach and the concept of the 'Active Publict, In Ike Nwosu, (ed.) Mass Communication and National Development. Aba : Frontier Publishers Limited, 1990. PP. 301-311.
Frank, R.E. and Greenberg, M.G. The Publicst Use of Television : Who Watches What and Why? Beverly Hill : Sage, 1980. PP.139-143.
Freedman, J.C. and Sears, D.O. "Selective Exposurett In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York : Academy Press, 1965. P.246.
Gerbner, G. Gross, L; Hoover, S; Morgan, M. and ~ignorielli, N. Religion and Television Philadephia : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1984. P.231
Hovland, C. ; Jiumsdain, A. and Sheffield, F. "The Effects of Presenting 'One Side1 Versus "Both Sidesf1 in Changing Opinion on a Controversial Subject", In W. Schramm and D. Roberts (ed.), 0p.Cit
Horsefield, P.G. Religious Television : An American Experience, New York : Longman, 1984
Krugman, Herbert "The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement", In W. Schramm and D. Roberts (ed.), 0p.Cit. Second Edition PP. 399-425.
Osuala, E.C. Introduction to Research Methodology. Onitsha : Africana - Feb Publishers Limited, 1987.
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L.A. and Rosengreen, K.E. "Uses and Gratifications Research : The Past Ten Yearstt In K.E. Rosengreen, L.A. Wenner and P; Palmgreed (ed.), Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985. PP.ll-37.
JOURNALS
Abelman, Robert, "Ten Commandments of the Electronic Church1' Channels of Communications. January/February (19851, 64 - 67.
Abelman, R. "Religious Television Uses and Gratifications" Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 31 (3) (19871, 293-307.
Atkin, Charles, "Anticipated Communication and Mass Media Information - Seeking", Public Opinion Quaterly, 37(1960), 386.
Buddenbaum, J.M. "Characteristics and Media-Related Needs of the Audience for Religious Television", Journalism Quaterly, 58 (19811, 266-272.
Burgoon, J.K. and Burgoon, M. "Predictors of Newspaper Readership", Journalism Quaterly 57 (1980), 589-596
Collins, Andrew and Zimmerman, Stephen, "Convergent and Divergent Social Cues : Effects of Televised Aggression on Children", Communication Research 2 (4) (19751, 331-342
Fore, W.F. "The Electronic Church", Ministry, January (19791, 4-7
Gaddy, D.G. "The Power of Religious Media: Religious Broadcast Use and the Role of Religious Organisations in Public Affairs". Review of Religious Research, 25(4) (1984) 289-301.
Gaddy, G.D. and Pritchard, D. Watching Religious Television is Like Attending Churchn. Journal of Communication, 35 (1) (19851, 123-131.
Johnstone, Ronald L. "Who Listens to Religious Broadcasts Anymore?", Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media XVI (1971), 91-101.
Katz, E. "Mass Communication Research and The Study of Popular Culture" Studies in Public Communication 2 (19591, 1 - 6.
Levy, E.R. and Windhal, S. "Audience Activity and Gratifications: A Conceptual Clarification and Exploration" Communication Research 1 1 (19841, 67-77.
Gallup, George "Scientific Method for Determining Reader-Interest", Journalism Quaterly, 7 (1930),1
Nafzinger, Ralph O., "Reader Interest Survey of Madison, Wisconsin", Journalism Quaterly, 7(1930), 441-456.
Rubin, Man and Pearse, Elizabeth, "Audience Activity and T.V. News Gratifications", Communication Research, 14 (1) (19871, 188-199.
Rubin, A.M., "Television Uses and Gratifications: The Interactions of Viewing Patterns and Motivations", Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 27 (19831, 37-51.
Rubin, A.M., "Ritualised and Instrumental Television Viewing", Journal of Communication, 34 (3) (19841, 67 - 77.
Schramm, Wilbur, "The Nature of News Journalism" Journalism Quaterly, 26 (19491, 259-269.
Schramm, W. and White, D.M., "Age, Education, Economic Status : Factors in Newspaper Readership" Journalism Quaterly, 26 (19491, 46-59.
Swanson, D.L. "Gratification Seeking, Media Exposure and Audience Interpretations: Some Directions for Research". Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 31 (19871, 237.
Teichert, W. "Television as Social Action : Towards the Situation of the Audience Research Methods and Critique" Radio and Television, 4 (1972), 437.
NEWSPAPER - Anam, Kate "televangelism (sic): Prosperity Vs
Salvation", Saturday Champ=, June 14, 1977 .P. 16.
UNPUBLISHED WORK
Okpata, S.N.C. "Mass Media selectivity in Udi" An Unpublished B.A. Thesis, U.N.N., Mass Communication Department, 1980.
BROADCAST MEDIUM
N . T . A . 2 , Channel 5, Lagos, "You can't Beat The Reachn, Week-end Report, February 8, 1997.
Department of Mass Communication, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
August, 1 9 9 7 .
Dear Respondent,.
QUESTIONNAIRE
I am a Post-graduate student of the above-named department. As part of the requirement for the award of the degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication, I am carrying out a research project on:
TELE-EVANGELISM IN NIGERIA: A STUDY OF ITS USES AND GRATIFICATIONS.
I will be grateful if you respond accurately to the questionnaire items. The study is purely for academic purposes. The information provided will be treated with utmost confidence.
Thanks in anticipation of your co-operation.
Yours faithfully,
GODSPOWER I. NMAI (RESEARCHER)
Q U E S T I O N N A I R E -
INSTRUCTION: Please tick ( ) in the box or space provided against the answer that is applicable.
PART ONE (General Information)
1 . Sex: Male 1-1 Female
2 . Age Range: 2 0 - 3 0 1 1 3 1 - 4 0 ( ( 4 1 -
51 - Above 1-1
3 . Residence: Ikoyi Yaba (-1 A jegunle n 4 . Religion: Christianity ( 1 1slam 1-1
Traditional 1-1 Others (1 5. If Christianity, What denomination:
Roman Catholic 1-1 Protestant (-1 Pentecostal 1-1
PART TWO
6. Do you own a television set or have regular access to one?
.7 . What type of programmes do you prefer watching mostly on television?
Variety shows \ \ Youth and Chilren's programmes 1-1 News programme 1-1 Documentaries 1-1 Music Video 1-1 Christian programmes 0
8. Do you watch,Christian programmes?
9 How frequent do you watch Christian programmes?
Often 1-1 Occasionally 1-1 Seldom 1-1 Never 1-1 Not ascertained 1-1
SECTION B
10. Why do you watch Christian programmes?
For Salvation 11 To feel close to God
To grow as a Christian 1-1 For Spiritual guide I] For behavioural guide 1-1 For Entertainment L__\
To pass time For relaxation r\ Because
it is my habit to watch any programm on television [--
For excitement 1-1
1 1 . How important is religion to you?
Very important 1-1 Somewhat important 1-1 Not very important [ I Not very important at
12. How frequent do you attend church service?
Very often 1-1 often 1-1 Occasional 1 1 Seldom 1-1 Never 1-1
If you do not watch Christian programmes, why is
it so?
I do not believe what tele-evangelists preach
Tele-evangelists use the programmes to seek for
popularity 1-1 Tele-evangelists are pretenders and hypocrites 1-1 Tele-evangelists are fraudsters 1-1 Tele-
evangelists attack their competetors 1-1 Tele-evangelists emphasize only prosperity
through miracle in their sermons, to the detriment
of other basic Christian teachings 1 1 I do
not want to be converted to Christianity 1-1 Any other reason apart from these please specify.
14. What benefits have you derived from watching
Christian programmes?
Deep knowledge of God Incnease in faith 1-1 Closeness to God (-1 Spiritual satisfaction 1-1 NO Entertainment No benefit at all 1-1
SECTION C
15. What is your favourite kind of Christian programmes?
Church service 11 Sermon T I Gospel music
Christian talk show 1-1 Christian drama/Soap
16. Why do you prefer such programmes?
They teach viewers more about God 1-1 They give
more spiritual satisfaction 1-1 They help
viewers grow as Christians -1 They address
viewers problems They are entertaining 1-1 They arouse and excite viewers., 1 1 Any other reason apart from these please specify.
SECTION D
17(a) Tele-evangelists solicit viewers financial
commitment to help fund the expensive cost of
programme production and air time. Have you ever
contributed?
yes ? 1-1 NO a 17(b) If you have ever contributed why?
Because I have more than e n o u g h ( To show
appreciation for the programmes 1-1 To thank
God for helping me through the programmes L-A -
For charitable reasons I-! To encourage
continuation of the programmes If
17(c) If you have never contributed financially, why?
I don't have enough (I I do not consider it
necessary 1 I Tele-evangelists are fraudsters
1-1 Tele-evangelism is a waste of church's
resources and so should be discontinued I I No reason Any other reason apart from these
please specify ................................
18. Were you converted to Christianity through
tele-evangelism?
19. Have you ever changed from one church to another
as a result of tele-evangelism? Yes I] No 1-1 20. Sometimes you prefer watching Christian programmes
to church attendance?
Strongly prefer )I Prefer (-1 Disapprove 1-1 Strongly disapprove
2'1. To what extent are Christian programmes (tele-
evangelism) effective enough to replace church
attendance?
Very effective Effective Fairly
effective Not effective 1-1 Very ineffective I]
SECTION E
22(a) Do you agree watching Christian programmes have
affected your spiritual life?
Strongly agree Agree 1-1 Disagree TI Strongly disagree 1-1
22(b) In what ways have the programmes affected your
life?
Through them I was converted Christianity r-1 I was a norminal Christian but got born again
through the programmes I I The programmes have reinforced my faith which
was weak fl They have reinforced my commitment as a Christian
They have not affected my life in any way
Any other way watching Christian programmes
have affected your life, please specify