Top Banner

of 21

Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

Jun 04, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    1/21

    ChE 304

    Chemical engineering laboratory - III

    Experiment No. 3 Group No. 03 (A2)

    Name of the experiment:

    STUDY OF A SINGLE PASS SHELL AND TUBE

    HEAT EXCHANGER

    Submitted by:

    Md. Hasib Al Mahbub

    Student Id: 0902045

    Level: 3; Term: 2

    Section: A2

    Date of performance: 21/01/2014

    Date of submission: 28/01/2014

    Partners Student Id. 0902041

    0902042

    0902043

    0902044

    Department of Chemical Engineering.

    Bangladesh University of engineering and technology, Dhaka.

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    2/21

    1

    Summary

    The objective of this experiment was to study a single pass shell and tube heat exchanger which

    included the comparison between theoretical and experimental results of both individual and

    overall heat transfer coefficients and tube side pressure drops. In this experiment, cooling water

    was used to recover heat form saturated steam. The cooling water was flown through the pipe

    and the saturated steam was flown through the annulus. The experiment was performed at

    different steam pressure. The values of overall heat transfer coefficient found experimentally

    vary from 173.7199- 290.2413 J/sec.m2.K where the theoretical values range from 1651.821-

    2593.331 J/sec.m2.K. The tube side pressure drop were in between 8092.587-39451.36 Pa

    experimentally, where the theoretical pressure drop range from 1987.478- 12326.29 Pa.

    Colburn JH factor (JH) vs. Reynoldss number (Re) and pressure drop (P) vs. velocity (v)

    graphs are plotted both for 2.5 and 5 psig. The graphs show deviation from the theoretical graphs.

    The possible discrepancies are described in discussion.

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    3/21

    1-1Shell

    andTube

    Heat

    Exchanger

    Manometer

    SteamIn

    Condensate

    Out

    WaterIn

    WaterOut

    WaterTank

    Pump

    Steam

    Trapper

    Thermometer

    Guage

    Pressure

    Controller

    Figure1:Schematicdiagramoftheexperimentalsetup

    Experimental Setup

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    4/21

    3

    Figure 3: Temperature profile of the Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Figure 2: Schematic Diagram of a 1-1 Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    T1Water Ts Steam

    T2

    Steam

    Condensed

    Cold Water

    Hot Water

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    5/21

    4

    Observed Data

    Weight of Bucket = 1.5 Kg

    Heat Exchanger

    Shell: Nominal Size 6

    Schedule No. 40

    Passes: Shell side=1

    Tube side=1

    Tubes: OD= 0.5 inch

    BWG=16

    Length=96 inch

    Number= 19

    Pump

    Centrifugal pump

    1.5 kW; 240 V; 50 Hz; 2900 rpm

    Hmax =38m; Qmax = 250 l/h

    Table 1: Table of observed data for the study of a single pass shell and tube heat exchanger

    No.

    of

    Obs

    Steam

    pressure

    Flow

    meter

    reading

    Water

    temperature

    Weight of

    Bucket

    +

    Condensate

    Collection time Manometer

    reading

    Inlet Outlet Water Condensat

    e

    Left Right

    psig Litre oC oC Kg sec sec inch inch

    1

    2.5 10 23

    30 2.35 14.75 60 33.5 36

    2 29 2.4 10.57 60 32.6 36.5

    3 28.5 2.5 8.47 60 31.5 37.3

    4 27.5 2.55 6.75 60 30 385 27 2.6 5.25 60 27.6 39.3

    6

    5 10 23

    31 2.1 11.47 60 33.4 35.8

    7 30.75 2.3 9.54 60 32.3 36.5

    8 30.5 2.5 8.56 60 31.5 37

    9 29.5 2.6 7.09 60 30 37.7

    10 28.75 2.65 5.41 60 27.5 39

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    6/21

    5

    Calculated Data

    Table 2: Table of different water bulk temperatures and flow rates of water and condensate

    No.of

    Obs

    Steampressure

    Waterbulk

    temperature

    (Tb)

    Weight Flow rate

    Water

    (mw)

    Condensat

    e

    (mc)

    Water

    (Ww)

    Condensate

    (Wc)

    psia oC kg kg kg/sec kg/sec

    1

    17.2

    26.5 9.96653 0.85 0.675697 0.014167

    2 26 9.96787 0.9 0.943034 0.015

    3 25.75 9.96853 1 1.176922 0.016667

    4 25.25 9.96984 1.05 1.477013 0.0175

    5 25 9.9705 1.1 1.899143 0.018333

    6

    19.7

    27 9.96517 0.6 0.868803 0.017 26.875 9.9655 0.8 1.044602 0.013333

    8 26.75 9.96585 1 1.164235 0.016667

    9 26.25 9.9672 1.1 1.405811 0.018333

    10 25.875 9.9682 1.15 1.842551 0.019167

    Table 3: Properties of water at bulk temperature

    No.of

    Obs

    Waterbulk

    temperature(Tb)

    Density

    (w)

    Viscosity() Heat Capacity(c) ThermalConductivity

    (k)oC Kg/m3 Pa-sec KJ/Kg-Kelvin Watt/m-Kelvin

    1 26.5 996.653 0.00086 4.181 0.60972 26 996.787 0.00087 4.181 0.60893 25.75 996.853 0.00088 4.182 0.6084 25.25 996.984 0.00089 4.182 0.6085 25 997.05 0.00089 4.182 0.607

    6 27 996.517 0.00085 4.181 0.611

    7 26.875 996.55 0.00085 4.181 0.618 26.75 996.585 0.00086 4.181 0.619 26.25 996.72 0.00087 4.181 0.609

    10 25.875 996.82 0.00087 4.181 0.609

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    7/21

    6

    Table 4: Properties of condensate at film temperature

    Table 5: Table of heat balances, LMTD and experimental overall heat transfer coefficient

    No.

    of

    Obs

    Heat absorbed

    by water

    (Qw)

    Heat released

    by steam

    (Qc)

    Average heat

    transfer

    (Qavg)

    LMTD Overall heattransfer co-

    efficient

    (Experimental)

    (UOE)

    KJ/sec KJ/sec KJ/sec oC J/sec.m2. K

    1 19.77562261 31.25350833 25.51456547 77.64741898 177.7150635

    2 23.6569524 33.09195 28.3744512 78.16162176 196.3346702

    3 27.07038471 36.76883333 31.91960902 78.41785647 220.1434079

    4 27.79591392 38.607275 33.20159446 78.92862108 227.5032022

    5 31.76886171 40.44571667 36.10728919 79.18316212 246.6182049

    6 29.05972155 22.355 25.70736077 80.03337223 173.7198577

    7 33.84796699 29.80666667 31.82731683 80.1625715 214.7293829

    8 36.50749315 37.25833333 36.88291324 80.29162756 248.4380115

    9 38.20502268 40.98416667 39.59459467 80.8064335 265.0043796

    10 44.29630391 42.84708333 43.57169362 81.19106797 290.2413437

    No. of

    Obs

    Film

    temperature

    (Tf)

    Viscosity

    ()

    Density

    (w)

    Thermal

    Conductivity

    (k)oC Kg/m3 Pa-sec Watt/m-Kelvin

    1 75.0625 0.00037 974.82 0.667

    2 74.875 0.00038 974.93 0.667

    3 74.78125 0.00038 974.99 0.667

    4 74.59375 0.00038 995.1 0.667

    5 74.5 0.00038 975.15 0.666

    6 77.0625 0.00037 973.61 0.668

    7 77.015625 0.00036 973.64 0.668

    8 76.96875 0.00037 973.67 0.668

    9 76.78125 0.00037 973.78 0.66810 76.640625 0.00037 973.87 0.668

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    8/21

    7

    Table 6: Table of nusselt number, prandtl number, shell and tube side heat transfer co-

    efficients and theoretical overall heat transfer coefficient

    No.

    of

    Obs

    Nusselt

    number

    (Nu)

    Prandtl

    number

    (Pr)

    Heat transfer

    co-efficient

    (Tube side)hi

    Heat transfer

    co-efficient

    (Shell side)

    ho

    Overall heat

    transfer co-

    efficient(Theoretical)

    (UOT)

    J/sec.m2. K J/sec.m2. K J/sec.m2. K

    1 53.08764109 5.897424963 3443.354763 4694.305766 1651.820895

    2 69.72368795 5.973838069 4516.463148 4655.903542 1945.816467

    3 83.74419646 6.052894737 5416.645899 4652.332961 2153.43645

    4 100.968729 6.121677632 6530.743325 4692.60798 2381.073628

    5 123.1305926 6.131762768 7951.092521 4636.44016 2593.330737

    6 64.72125544 5.816448445 4206.881604 4676.51856 1869.194017

    7 75.04255252 5.825983607 4869.782664 4706.898753 2041.264854

    8 82.29696073 5.89452459 5340.547451 4673.020676 2141.4348439 96.27353274 5.972857143 6237.295898 4666.042579 2320.590061

    10 119.5366115 5.972857143 7744.446425 4660.863049 2570.638783

    Table 7: Table of Reynolds number, friction factor, jh, velocity, and mass velocity of water

    No.

    of

    Obs

    Reynolds

    number

    (Re)

    Friction

    factor

    (f)

    Velocity of water

    (Vw)

    Mass velocity

    (Gt)

    jH

    ft2/in2 m/sec Kg/sec.m2

    1 5536.655319 0.00033 0.514156 512.4351199 26.6662382

    2 7727.213425 0.0003 0.717483538 715.1782638 34.81625786

    3 9643.689957 0.00028 0.895372019 892.5542833 41.56792595

    4 12102.63527 0.00027 1.123526074 1120.13752 49.8502936

    5 15561.56116 0.00025 1.444533524 1440.27215 60.95457329

    6 7118.96444 0.00031 0.661185789 658.882879 32.60597739

    7 8559.457667 0.00029 0.794947694 792.2051245 37.78511626

    8 9539.730612 0.00028 0.885958061 882.9325141 41.20905477

    9 11519.20394 0.00027 1.069647532 1066.139088 47.91833705

    10 15097.84657 0.00025 1.401811645 1397.353884 59.49709619

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    9/21

    8

    Table 8: Table of tube side experimental and theoretical pressure drops

    No.

    of

    Obs

    Diff. in manometer

    reading

    Pressure drop

    (Experimental)

    (p)

    Pressure drop

    (Theoretical)

    (p)

    Wall

    temperature

    (Tw)

    Viscosity at

    wall

    temperature

    ()m Pa Pa oC Kg/m3

    1 0.063500772 8429.778306 1987.477737 65.35 0.00043

    2 0.099061205 13150.45416 3496.852602 65.1 0.00043

    3 0.147321791 19557.08567 5133.144374 64.975 0.00043

    4 0.203202471 26975.29058 7953.500684 64.725 0.00043

    5 0.297183614 39451.36247 12326.28535 64.6 0.00044

    6 0.060960741 8092.587174 3096.933688 67.05 0.00042

    7 0.106681297 14162.02755 4227.592083 66.9875 0.00042

    8 0.139701699 18545.51227 5109.137718 66.925 0.00042

    9 0.195582378 25963.71718 7364.585232 66.675 0.00042

    10 0.292103552 38776.98021 11789.0593 66.4875 0.00042

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    10/21

    9

    Sample Calculation

    Sample calculation for observation no. 6

    Water inlet temperature, T1 = 23oC

    Water outlet temperature, T2 = 31oC

    Water Mean temperature, Tm =2

    TT21

    =

    2

    3123= 27 oC

    Properties of water at mean temperature (27 oC),

    Density, = 996.517 Kg/m3

    Heat capacity, Cp = 4.181 KJ/Kg-kelvin

    Viscosity, =0 .00085 Pa-sec

    Thermal conductivity, k = .611 Watt/m-kelvin

    Weight of bucket and condensate = 2.1 kg

    Weight of bucket = 1.5 kg

    Weight of condensate = (2.1-1.5) kg

    = 0.6 kg

    Flow rate of condensate, mc =sec60

    Kg0.6

    = 0.01 Kg/sec

    Heat of condensation, c = 2235.5 KJ/Kg

    Heat released by condensation, Qc= mcc

    = (0.012235.5) KJ/sec

    = 22.355 KJ/sec

    Volume of water = 10 L

    Weight of water = 10996.517/1000 = 9.96517 Kg

    Flow rate of water, mw = (9.96517/11.47) Kg/sec

    = 0.868802964 Kg/sec

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    11/21

    10

    Heat absorbed by water, Qw = mwCp(T2-T1)

    = 0.868802964 4.181(31-23)

    = 29.05972155KJ/ sec

    Average heat transfer, Qavg =2

    QQ cw

    =2

    29.05972355.22

    = 25.70736077 KJ/sec

    Saturation temperature at 5 psig (=19.7 psia), Ts= 107.1oC

    Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference,

    LMTD =

    2s

    1s

    2s1s

    TT

    TTln

    )T(T)T(T

    =

    2s

    1s

    12

    TT

    TTln

    TT

    =

    131.071

    321.071ln

    3213

    = 80.03337223 K

    The outside area of a 0.5 inch 16 BWG tube = 0.03991 m2/ lin m

    Length of each tube = 96 inch = 2.438 m

    Number of tubes = 19

    Total outside area, A0 = 19 2.4384 0.03991

    = 1.849 m2

    Experimental overall heat transfer co-efficient,

    UOE =LMTDA

    Q

    0

    avg

    = 3600143.3259849.1

    35.23095

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    12/21

    11

    = 173.72 J/sec.m2. K

    Prandtl Number, Pr =kCp

    = 5.81645

    Flow area of tube, Ai = 0.0000694 m2

    Velocity of water, Vw =i

    w

    A

    m

    =190.0000694996.517

    0.868803

    = 0.66119 m/sec

    Reynolds number, Re =

    vD wi

    = 7118.96

    Tube wall temperature (steam side),

    Tw =2

    )]TT(0.5[Ts 21

    =2

    )]3132(0.5[107.1

    = 67.07 oC

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    13/21

    12

    Using Seider-Tate equation,

    Nu =0.027 Re0.8 Pr1/3(f/ w)0.14

    = 0.027(7118.96)0.8 (5.81645)1/3(0 .00085/0.00042)0.14

    = 32.606

    Water side heat transfer co-efficient for turbulent flow,

    hi = Nu i

    D

    k

    = 4206.88 J/ sec. m2. K

    Film temperature, Tf = Ts 0.75(Ts-Tw)

    = 107.1 0.75 (107.1- 67.05)

    = 77.0625 oC

    Properties of condensate at film temperature (77.0625 oC),

    Density, f = 973.61 Kg/m3

    Viscosity, f = 0.00037 Pa-sec

    Thermal conductivity, kf= 0.668 Watt/ m-kelvin

    Heat of condensation, hfg = c= 2235500 J/Kg

    Density of steam, v 0

    Saturation temperature, Tg =Ts = 107.1oC = 380.1 K

    Using Nusselt equation, steam side heat transfer co-efficient,

    ho = 0.725

    25.0

    wgf

    3ffgvff

    )Tnd(T

    kgh)(

    = 0.725

    25.0

    wgof

    3ffg

    2f

    )T(TD

    kgh

    = 4676.52 J/ sec. m2.oC

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    14/21

    13

    Theoretical overall heat transfer co-efficient,

    UOT =

    -1

    ii

    o

    0 hD

    D

    h

    1

    = 1869.19 J/ sec. m2.K

    jH factor calculation, jH = Nu .Pr-1/3.

    14.0

    w

    = 32.606

    Tube side Pressure Drop Calculation,

    Specific gravity, s = 1

    Internal diameter, D = 0.37 inch = 0.031 ft

    Length of the tube, L = 8 ft

    No. of pass in tube side, n = 1

    The factor, t =

    14.0

    w

    =

    14.0

    0.00042

    0.00085

    = 1.10373

    Mass velocity, Gt = 658.883 lb/hr.ft2

    For this mass velocity,2g'

    V 2

    144

    52.5= 0.03 psi

    For Reynolds number of 7118.96,

    Friction factor, f = 0.00031ft2/in2

    Pressure drop, pi =t

    10

    2

    t

    Ds105.22

    LnGf

    = 0.3288 psi

    Pressure drop due to velocity head,

    p r=

    2g'

    V

    s

    4n 2

    144

    52.5

    = 0.12042 psi

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    15/21

    14

    Total theoretical pressure drop, p = pi+ pr

    = (0.3288 + 0.12042)

    = .4493psi

    Again,Manometer reading (left) = 33.4 in

    Manometer reading (right) = 35.8 in

    Difference = (35.8 33.4) in

    = 2.4 in

    Experimental pressure drop, p = 1.174 psi

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    16/21

    15

    Results and Discussions

    The results are summarized bellows

    Heat transfer co-efficient (Shell side), h0 4636.44016-4706.898753 J/sec.m2. K

    Heat transfer co-efficient (Tube side), hi 3443.354763-7951.092521 J/sec.m2. K

    Overall heat transfer co-efficient

    (Theoretical), UOT

    1651.821- 2593.331 J/sec.m2.K

    Overall heat transfer co-efficient

    (Experimental), UOE

    173.7199- 290.2413 J/sec.m2.K

    For the jHFactor vs. NReplotted on log-log coordinate

    1. The slope for 2.5 psig = 0.8 is shown at figure 4

    2. The slope for 5 psig = 0.8 is shown at figure 5

    All the graphs had shown their expected characteristics. The slope for steam pressure 2.5 psig

    is 0.8 and for steam pressure 5.0 is 0.8 whereas the theoretical value is 0.8. Thus, the graphs

    establish the validity of Sieder-Tate equation.

    The theoretical and experimental results shows some discrepancies. The possible causes are

    discussed here-

    1. The theoretical values obtained in this experiment are not wholly theoretical. Thesevalues are found based on some parameters that are determined experimentally in one

    way or another. Hence, they cannot be said to be purely theoretical.

    2. There might be some heat loss through the pipes and wall which was not accountedduring the calculation. This might have brought the discrepancy. The theoretical value

    was not a pure literature value. It was calculated by manipulating some data or

    parameters.

    3. The apparatus was very old and proper maintenance is not taken for several years.Excess fouling may encounter in tube side which decrease the overall heat transfer co-

    efficient.

    4. Heat absorbed by water was greater than the heat released by the steam which isnormally impossible. Uses of steam trapper caused this.

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    17/21

    16

    5. We assumed that the convection heat transfer co-efficient are constant through the heatexchanger, but experimentally the heat transfer co-efficient were not constant while

    operation.

    6. The steam pressure was considered constant during operation, but, it was not constantwhile operation.

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    18/21

    17

    NuPr (-1/3)(u/uw) -.014 vs. Reynolds Number (2.5 psig)

    Figure 4: Graph of NuPr (-1/3)(u/uw) -.014 vs. Reynolds Number at 2.5 psig pressure

    y = 0.027x0.8

    10

    100

    5000

    NuPr^(-1/3)(u/uw)^-.014

    Reynold's Number

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    19/21

    18

    NuPr (-1/3)(u/uw) -.014 vs. Reynolds Number (5 psig)

    Figure 5: Graph of NuPr (-1/3)(u/uw) -.014 vs. Reynolds Number at 5 psig pressure

    y = 0.027x0.8

    10

    100

    5000

    NuPr^(-1/3)(u/uw)^-.014

    Reynold's Number

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    20/21

    19

    Pressure drop vs. Water velocity (2.5 psig)

    Figure 6: Graph of Pressure drop vs. water velocity at 2.5 psig pressure

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    40000

    45000

    0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

    Pressu

    redrop

    Water velocity

    Theoretical

    Experimental

  • 8/13/2019 Study of a Single Pass Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    21/21

    20

    Pressure drop vs. Water velocity (2.5 psig)

    Figure 7: Graph of Pressure drop vs. water velocity at 2.5 psig pressure

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    40000

    45000

    0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

    Pressuredrop

    Water velocity

    Theoretical

    Experimental