8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
1/38
DEPARTMENT OF MEDIA, CULTURE AND
LANGUAGE
Academic Year: 2011-2012
MODULE CODE: ELA020C013A/S
MODULE TITLE: Language Society and Power
MODULE CONVENER: Carole Sedgwick
Email: [email protected]
Tel: 020 83923364
Room: QB114
Study Skills Booklet
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
2/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
2
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
3/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
ContentsAcademic Year: 2011-2012 .......................................................................................1
Contents ................................................................................................................ 3
Required self study tasks ....................................................................................... 4
Evaluating your work: the assessment criteria ..................................................... 5
Reading and notemaking ...................................................................................... 7
Critical thinking: What is a good argument? ....................................................... 23
Effective citation ................................................................................................. 24
Avoiding Plagiarism ........................................................................................... 27
Defining terms & reading strategically ................................................................ 29
Accurate language use and proofreading ........................................................... 32
Essay planning .................................................................................................... 33
Assessment Criteria: Written Work ...................................................................... 34
3
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
4/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Required self study tasks
Click on the link for each task in moodle for the appropriate week and submit your
answers. For some weeks (indicated in the schedule below) you should also bring
the completed exercise to discuss in class.
Week Self-study task
2 Reading and notemaking.In class week 2
3 Effective citation moodle quiz and assignment.
4 Moodle quiz on library skills
5 Analyse a student essay. In class week 6
6 Avoiding plagiarism.7 Moodle quiz on writing accurately and clearly.
8 Critical thinking: What is a good argument?
9 Moodle quiz on critical thinking and argument.
10 Defining terms and thinking strategically (questions 1-3).
Essay planning.
In class week 11
11 Accurate language use and proofreading.
Evaluating your work: the assessment criteria.
In class week 12 (evaluating your work only).
4
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
5/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Evaluating your work: the assessment criteria
1. Look at the assessment criteria for written work on page 34. What are the main
differences between:
a. A first and an upper second?
b. An upper second and a lower second?
2. The following four paragraphs are extracts from student essays. They all have
some good qualities but the grades they were given vary. What class would you
put each one in? (e.g. 1st, 2.1, 2.2 etc.) Be prepared to explain why in relation to
the criteria.
a. Linguistic relativity underlines how differences between two languages
would cause the speakers of each language to perceive the world in
completely different ways. These cultural differences emphasise the truth
behind Scrutons statement; if different languages cause different cultures
to occur, then it has the power to both unify and separate, it seems to
control the world as a whole, language would be the first and most
important issue to address.
b. Unfortunately, these ageist stereotypes can lead to unfair discrimination.
In a study by Carver and de la Garza (1984 as cited by Coupland et al
1991b:89), it was shown that following a road accident, the questions
asked by police were different depending on the ages of those involved.
For example, if the accident included a young person, they would most
likely be asked if they were speeding or had been drinking alcohol. If older
adults were involved in the accident, however, they most likely would be
asked about their physical and mental capabilities. Older adults also face
unfair discrimination in the workplace based on stereotypes about their
lack of energy, flexibility, and ability and willinglnes to learn (Kirton &
Green,2005:57). A potential employer may reject an older adult in favour
of a younger person purely based on these stereotypes.
c. Joanne Winter (1993) compared two political interviews, one conducted by
a male interviewer and the other a female interviewer. The intervieweeswere both high ranking individuals in the Australian government, at that
5
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
6/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
time. From comparing these two interviews, Winter found that the male
interviewer used an aggressive style of interviewing, such as interrupting
his interviewee. Whereas the female interviewer did not interrupt her
interviewee at all, but was interrupted five times (Coates 2003).
d. The language that is used when talking to young children and the elderly
can often be very similar. In both cases it seems to be the case that
younger and middle aged adults talk down to children and the elderly, and
often do so in a very patronising way. This contrasts with certain societies,
such as China and India, where elderly people are viewed with respect
and prided for their wisdom. In our society it is quite often the opposite, as
we find the elderly generally ignored and rejected for their old age rather
than embraced because of it. Peccei (2004:124) suggests that so many of
us are prone to doing this because of the following reasons:
Hearing often becomes less acute as people get older, and this can lead to
a reduced understanding of rapid or whispered speech, or speech in a noisy
environment... The normal ageing of the vocal chords and muscles
controlling breathing results in slower speech and a voice which has a
higher pitch and weaker volume and resonance than that of younger adults.
People are prone to make assumptions about people based on the way they
speak.
6
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
7/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Reading and notemaking
This week you need to read chapter 2 of the Language Society and Power
coursebook and complete the following task before the next class session.
1. Read the whole chapter through then look at the two sets of students notes on
the first part (p.23-29). Decide which set of notes is the most worthwhile and
be prepared to say why. Think about:
a. Which student thought through the ideas more?
b. What strategies did they use to organise the information?
c. How useful will the notes be when they have to write an essay later
on?
2. Finally, make your own notes on the rest of the chapter. Try to do this on just
the one page of A4. Pick out only the important points and organise the notes
carefully. You will compare your notes with other students in the next class.
Student 1
Ferdinand de Saussures theory of signs will provide a way of discussing howmeaning is constructed at the level of a word, how this can change, how wordsfit together into larger structures (sentences) and what happens when we make
choices in sentences.
Only when we have this module is it possible to discuss what politically correctmeans and how such language functions.
Language is a way of representing reality. I could take a photograph ofsomething, paint a picture or even write a piece of music.
All signs have two parts, a concept and something that is connected to theconcept. The pedestrian signals that tell you when to walk or not are signsbecause of the connection between the red light and the concept of stopping.
Words in language are therefore signs. For de Saussure a sign is made up of twothins; a signifier and signified. His definition of the sign makes a distinctionbetween the sound we hear (signifier) and the concept this makes of think of(the signified).
The arbitrary connection between words and their meaning was one of Ferdinandde Saussures insights. There is not straightforward connection between aconcept and a sound. A bee in Englihs will buzz. In Japanese it makes the soundboon boon.
There are two parts of language, langue and parole. Langue is the system that
makes parole possible chess game you play by the rules. Parole as individualswe can do things in language that we havent done before.
7
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
8/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
One way of changing is to legislate, like the dictator in Turkmeinistan. The newbahaviour has to become part of the langue, that is, accepted conventional ruleof the language.
Meaning of a sign is the space that sighs occupy and fit together, e.g. stagger isnot march or amble.
In Indian English, wallah is used for tradesperson or worker, e.g. taxiwallah. Itmay not be relevant in other parts of the world - wallah can be an insult.Language changes. Niggardly very different meaning unrelated to ethnicity.
Synchronic refers to a particular point in time, diachronic to talk about howlanguage changes over time. Language always implies both an establishedsystem and an evolution; at every moment it is an existing institution and aproduct of the past. (de Saussure 1966:8).
Student 2
1. Linguistic SIGN = SIGNIFIER (label) + SIGNIFIED (concept)
Link between signifier & signified is arbitrary:
no natural connection between sound and concept e.g. bee buzzesin English and boon boon in Japanese
Signs get meaning partly from relationships to other signs: march is not the same as stagger or amble
Signs get meaning from relationships to other signs within a speechcommunity
wallah in Indian English relates to tradesperson. Other parts ofEnglish speaking world not understood or perjorative term
2. Two aspects of language:
Langue Parole
Rules of language system: Rules of chess, script of a play Unconscious and abstract
Actual use of language: Playing chess, performing a playN.B.
Creative can construct sentencesnever said or written before
3. Language can change
By legislation (uncommon) Individuals use a new word or old word in different way and it is accepted,
recognised. Spaces in the linguistic system reconfigured to accommodate thenew word.
Two aspects to the study of language change
Synchronic : language at a particular point in time.
8
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
9/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Diachronic : how language changes over time.
9
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
10/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Analysing a student essay
1. Read the example essay below and the criteria for marking written workon page
34.
a. What class would you put it in? (e.g. 1st, 2.1, 2.2 etc.) Be prepared to
explain why in relation to the criteria.
b. What are the strengths of this essay in terms of the way it is written and
presented?
Essay question
Facts are facts; angles of telling can do nothing to change this. Discuss in
relation to the pieces from two newspapers (attached) paying attention to
the specific linguistic choices made.
Example essay
"Facts are facts; angles of telling can do nothing to change this."
While it may be true that a "fact is a fact," language is a medium of
expressing a facta medium that is guided by the values and ideals of
the speaker or writer and the social norms of the culture. Roger Fowler
writes that 'language is not neutral, but a highly constructive mediator'
(1991:1). Thus, it is nearly impossible for facts to be completely objective
and accurate when put into words. This theory holds true of the media
especially the news media. In this essay, I will attempt to demonstrate
the partiality of, and the influence of social contexts on language using
examples from two newspaper articlesone from The Sun and one from
The Timesboth writing on the same event and published on the same
day. I will examine the different emphases of the two articles through
their leads, headlines, sources, description of actors, language usage and
the underlying news values.
10
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
11/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Lead
Bell describes the "lead sentence" as the 'most distinctive feature of
the news discourse' (1991:176). Though short, the lead is essentially a
summary of the rest of the article. The lead sentence in The Sun's article
reads as follows: 'PORTUGUESE cops came up with their sickest slur yet
against the McCanns yesterday claiming little Maddies body may have
been kept in a FRIDGE before being dumped.' Before even getting into
the body of the article, The Sun makes it clear with which side they most
sympathize. It is clear that the Portuguese "cops"a term full of negative
connotationsare to blame for this "sick" rumour against the McCanns.
The presupposition behind this statement is that there have been several
others and that the Portuguese police are behind all of them. This
statement emphasizes the brutality of this "slur" and the alleged culprits
behind it by capitalizing the words "fridge" and "Portuguese." The author
also subtly sneaks in the term "little"often seen as a term of innocence
before Maddie as if to contrast the malicious-intending "Portuguese
cops" with nave "little Maddie."
Even though both The Sun and The Times are describing the same
event, their lead sentences could not be more different. The Times' lead
sentence states: 'The parents of Madeleine McCann have pleaded for an
end to the distressing smear campaign that has suggested that they may
have killed their missing daughter.' This lead sentence, like the one in
The Sun, acknowledges the ongoing "smear campaign" against the
McCanns, however, unlike The Sun, does not claim to know who the
culprits are. The Sun's leadmakes the "Portuguese cops" the subject of
11
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
12/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
the sentence whereas in The Times, "The parents of Madeleine McCann"
are the subject. Even the alleged "smears" are different in the two
newspapers: The Sun focuses on the rumour that Madeleine's dead body
"may have been kept in a fridge" while The Times focuses on the rumour
that the McCanns may have "killed their missing daughter."
Headline
The role of the headline is to catch the public's attention and to pare
down the lead sentence into a "single main event" (Bell 1991: 187). The
Times' headline reads: 'Kate and Gerry McCann's friends refute missing
hours claim as smears continue.' There is an interesting distinction
between this headline and the lead of this article. In the headline, it
names "Kate and Gerry McCann's friends" as the subjects who are refuting
the "smear", whereas in the lead sentence names "The parents of
Madeleine McCann" as the subjects. Both are misleading, however. The
article does not quote the McCanns at all, but rather their spokesman,
Clarence Mitchell. As for mention of the McCanns' friends, only one short
paragraph out of 12 quotes a "source close to the McCanns" and one
sentence mentions that the McCanns' "friends" are aiding in refuting the
rumour.
The headline from The Sun's article takes a very different viewpoint.
Whereas The Times' headlinefocuses on the main event of the storythe
continuing smearsThe Sun's headline focuses on minor detail: the
rumour that Madeleine's body may have been kept in a fridge. It is done
in a "double decked" fashion with one smaller headline above another.
The upper headline says: 'Cops' Most Sickening Slur Yet', then in large,
12
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
13/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
bolded letters below, it says: 'Maddies body was kept in fridge.'
Obviously, the point is to "grab the attention." However, the story itself
discusses the many other "smears" and allegations far more than this
particular one. Bell claims that headlines that focus on secondary events
or details are particularly revealing cases: 'The very fact that a headline
features something which the story presents as lesser re-weights the
news values in the story' (Bell, 1991:188-189). Most likely The Sun chose
to focus on this secondary aspect of the story because of its inherent
news valueit is negative, vivid and grotesquethus "hooking" the
reader into finishing the article.
Sources
The sources in both articles inspire less than full confidence in their veracity.
The sources range from "detectives" and "police sources" to "a source" and "a family friend."
The only definite sources named in both articles are Clarence Mitchellthe McCanns'
spokesmanand theDiario de Noticias newspaper in Spain. The Sun also quotes the
Spanish civil guard spokesman, Antonio Castilla. Neither article has more or better sources
than the other; however the certainty with which the sources are described is significantly
different from one newspaper to the other. It should be noted, however, that throughout the
articles the most outrageous claims are always backed by the weakest sources.
In The Sun, sources are described with high degree of certainty and almost entirely
using the active voice. For example, concerning the Portuguese police, The Sun writes:
'Detectives are convinced Police sources revealedPortuguese police
have leaked'The Times, on the contrary, describes the same sources with a low degree
of certainty and using the passive voice: "It was claimed yesterday that police in
Portugal believe [The] Diario de Noticias newspaper said that officers
13
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
14/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
believed The report [is] credited to anonymous detectives from the
Polcia Judiciria." The difference between the two is enough that one
could read The Sun's article and assume certainty where it is clearly not
deserved.
Description of Portuguese Police
The newspapers are different in how they portray both the
Portuguese police and the McCanns. Although both seem to favour the
McCanns, they go about portraying the police in very different fashions.
The Sun's article is quite clear in its opinion of the Portuguese police as
frantic to accuse someone for Madeleine's disappearance and almost
villainous in their continuing "smear campaign" against the McCanns. In
the synopsis of this story on the first page of that day's newspaper, the
Portuguese police are described as "desperate cops," and throughout the
article itself, they are seen as the ones spreading what are described as
"sick allegations" and "sick slurs." The article uses words like
"extraordinary" and "bizarre" to describe the theory that the Kate McCann
may have killed her daughter.
The Times is not as overt in blaming the Portuguese police for the
continuing slurs; however, it does imply that they probably are to blame.
The article uses the passive voice insofar as it regards the Portuguese
police: 'It was claimed yesterday that police in Portugal believe that Kate
McCann killed Madeleine...' It, however, gives little space to discussing
this theory and why it maybe relevant and far more space to the
refutation of it. At one point the article says, 'The police theory was
described as total rubbish.'
14
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
15/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Description of the McCanns
As mentioned above, both articles favour the McCanns. The Times'
article displays Gerry and Kate McCann as pro-active in their daughter's
search, innocent of the circulating rumours, and as good people with
whom we can identify. It does this in three ways. Firstly, as already
mentioned, the fact that the article mentions that the McCanns' friends
are refuting these claims helps readers see them as innocentthey have
both "witnesses" and support. Secondly, it heavily emphasizes that the
McCanns are a church-going family. The picture that accompanies the
story shows Gerry and Kate McCann outside of their local church; the
second paragraph in the article makes a point of mentioning that
'[Tomorrow] Kate and Gerry McCann will attend a church service near
their home'a point which it restates further in the article again. The
assumption is that readers will make the connection that if the McCanns
are pious, they must be true to their word and, thus, innocent. Thirdly,
they are shown as active not only in finding their own daughter but also in
saving other families from similar fates. This can be seen in their
apparent desire to give interviews and use their campaign as 'an
opportunity to raise awareness about other missing children and to call for
better alert systems.'
The Sun's article, in contrast, shows its bias for the McCanns more
by making them seem victimized by the smears and by personalizing
them. It draws a harsh distinction between the "desperate" Portuguese
police and the innocent McCanns. And, unlike The Times' article, which
always refers to the McCanns and Madeleine formally, The Sun calls the
15
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
16/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
McCanns by their first names and nicknamesKate, Gerry, "little
Maddie"suggesting a sense of intimacy.
Language Usage
The use of language in newspaper articles can be an interesting clue
to their underlying perspectives and values. The Sun and The Times have
many differences in their linguistic usage. Both articles have instances of
presuppositions. As I already mentioned, the headline and lead in The
Sun's article presupposes that the Portuguese police were behind the
leakages and smears against the McCanns, and this one was only the
latest of several. The clearest presupposition in The Times is that the
McCanns are innocent, the victims of what is described as a "smear
campaign" or "black propaganda." I have already discussed the
differences in voiceThe Sun uses the active voice more, while The Times
uses the passive voice. This is directly tied to modalityThe Sun
expresses strong certainty in its facts and sources while The Times is
more vague and doubtful. Between the two articles, the greatest
similarites are related to the rumours being spread. The Times uses
phrases such as "distressing smear campaign," "series of allegations," and
"black propaganda," while The Sun uses "sickening slur," "extraordinary
theory" and "bizarre claim." As a whole, The Sun writes more simply and
informally, using shorter paragraphs and shorter sentences while The
Times writes more professionally and formally using longer paragraphs.
News Values
Every article that is published in a newspaper has gone through
several processes to establish its news value. There are several principles
16
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
17/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
that authors and editors use to determine this and it differs from
newspaper to newspaper depending on who its audience is, what will sell
and whether it is unique. News values are essential to the survival of a
newspaper. Leonardo Ralha, editor at Correio da Manh, the largest-
circulation newspaper in Portugal, understands the importance of news
values and how they relate to the Madeleine McCann story: 'Whatever
happened is a tragedy, but it is also a major, fascinating story... It's
[terrible] in a tragic case like this, but the simple truth is that we have
sold more newspapers' (Cited in Pfanner, 2007:2).
The Sun and The Times are clearly writing for different audiences
with different expectations. Though both newspapers are covering the
same event, the articles are completely different. The facts of the event
may be the same, but the expression of these factswhat little is known
of themproduced two very different articles. In this essay, I have
illustrated the biases and differences of the two articles by examining
their leads, headlines, sources, and description of actors, language usage
and the underlying news values. So, are facts "just facts"? Perhaps, until
you put them into words. But this is certain: facts are never "just facts" in
the news.
News is a representation of the world in language; because
language is a semiotic code, it imposes a structure of values,
social and economic in origin, on whatever is represented;
and so inevitably news, like every discourse, constructively
patterns that of which it speaks.
(Fowler, 1991:
4)
17
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
18/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Bibliography
Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media, Oxford: Blackwell.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News, London: Routledge.
Pfanner, E. (4 November 2007). "Tabloids keep Madeleine McCann inHeadlines." International Herald Tribune, Internet WWW page at URL:http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/04/business/MCCANN05.php(accessed 10/11/07)
18
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
19/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Analysing the question
2. This essay question has quite a typical wording. First it gives you a statement.
Then it asks you to discuss the statement.
a. Do you think the lecturer usually expects you to agree ordisagree with the
statement in this kind of question?
b. What does discuss mean in this context?
Facts are facts; angles of telling can do nothing to change this. Discuss in
relation to the pieces from two newspapers (attached) paying attention to
the specific linguistic choices made.
Analysing the introduction
3. Decide which sentence in the introduction (below) does each of the following:
a. Gives the thesis of the essay the main idea and the response to the
question.
b. Gives an outline of the main sections of the essay.
c. Explains how the student intends to support her thesis in the rest of the
essay.
d. Repeats the statement from the question.
e. Comments on the statement.
f. Narrows the focus down to a more specific context.
g. Supports her comments with a quotation.
(1) "Facts are facts; angles of telling can do nothing to change this." (2)
While it may be true that a "fact is a fact," language is a medium of
expressing a facta medium that is guided by the values and ideals of
the speaker or writer and the social norms of the culture. (3) Roger Fowlerwrites that 'language is not neutral, but a highly constructive mediator'
(1991:1). (4)Thus, it is nearly impossible for facts to be completely
objective and accurate when put into words. (5)This theory holds true of
the mediaespecially the news media. (6) In this essay, I will attempt to
demonstrate the partiality of, and the influence of social contexts on
language, using examples from two newspaper articlesone from The
Sun and one from The Timesboth writing on the same event andpublished on the same day. (7) I will examine the different emphases of
19
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
20/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
the two articles through their leads, headlines, sources, description of
actors, language usage and the underlying news values.
20
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
21/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Analysing a body paragraph
4. Below is one of the paragraphs from the body of the essay.
a. Which sentence contains the main idea of the paragraph?
b. What is the purpose of the rest of the paragraph?
c. How would you describe the structure of the paragraph?
d. What role do the extracts from the newspaper article play?
Description of the McCanns
As mentioned above, both articles favour the McCanns. The Times'
article displays Gerry and Kate McCann as pro-active in their daughter's
search, innocent of the circulating rumours, and as good people with
whom we can identify. It does this in three ways. Firstly, as already
mentioned, the fact that the article mentions that the McCanns' friends
are refuting these claims helps readers see them as innocentthey have
both "witnesses" and support. Secondly, it heavily emphasizes that the
McCanns are a church-going family. The picture that accompanies the
story shows Gerry and Kate McCann outside of their local church; the
second paragraph in the article makes a point of mentioning that
'[Tomorrow] Kate and Gerry McCann will attend a church service near
their home'a point which it restates further in the article again. The
assumption is that readers will make the connection that if the McCanns
are pious, they must be true to their word and, thus, innocent. Thirdly,
they are shown as active not only in finding their own daughter but also in
saving other families from similar fates. This can be seen in their
apparent desire to give interviews and use their campaign as 'an
opportunity to raise awareness about other missing children and to call for
better alert systems.'
21
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
22/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
5. We could represent the structure of the above paragraph in an outline like this:
Main point: Article shows McCanns as good & innocent
Supporting point 1: Emphasises that friends support them
Supporting point 2: Highlights churchgoing
o Evidence: Picture of church shown
o Evidence : Mentions will attend church
Supporting point 3: Shows them as helping others
o Evidence: Mentions they want to raise awareness etc.
This is also a good way of planning out what you are going to write. Fornext week
do a similar outline below for one body paragraph in the essay you are going to
write:
Main point:
Supporting point 1:
o Evidence:
Supporting point 2:
o Evidence:
Supporting point 2:
o Evidence:
22
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
23/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Critical thinking: What is a good argument?
One of the things lecturers are looking for in your work is a good argument. Thismeans that what you say is carefully expressed, supported by evidence, logicaland
leads towards a conclusion.
Read the following argument carefully and answer the questions:
1. What is the conclusion?
2. What problems are there with the argument? (There are at least eight
criticisms you can make!)
3. How would you have to change this text to make it into a good argument?
Womens talk at work
It is well known that women talk more than men. However, because they
are naturally less competitive and more polite in the way that they speak,
they may not be so successful at work. According to Jo Cameron, a former
contestant on BBC programme The Apprentice, Women are traditionally
more modest than men when it comes to putting themselves forward.
They use passive language and think out loud. Women also have a
tendency to apologise for slip-ups and look after everyone else beforethemselves (2008). She claims that women need to be trained to
communicate more effectively in the male-dominated work environment.
Women are weak and indecisive when putting forward their point of view,
using hedges such as may,probably, or I think. This is proved by the
following example from Coates (1996, p. 155), where the speaker talks
about a meeting she is organising:
HELEN: but what it means about next week is we may not have
enough for two groups cos i had two apologies in advance/
[...] and you know some other people may have commitments/ so i dont think were going to run two groups/
Men do not express uncertainty about what they say and statistics show
that women's pay is on average 17.2 per cent less than men's pay
(Women and equality unit, 2008). Therefore, the way that women speak
disadvantages them at work. Women can either continue to be
marginalised in the workplace or change the way that they speak. It is
clear that if women want to be taken more seriously at work they have to
learn how to talk like men.
Bibliography
23
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
24/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Cameron, J. (2008) Women in HR must end seen but not heard mentality.
Internet WWW page at
URL:http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2008/05/27/46024/
women-in-hr-must-end-seen-but-not-heard-mentality.html (accessed 20th June
2008)
Coates, J. (1996). Women talk: conversation between women friends. Oxford:
Blackwell
Women and equality unit. (2008) Gender pay gap. Internet WWW page at URL:
http://www.equalities.gov.uk/women_work/pay.htm (accessed 20th June 2008)
Effective citation
Citation means using something that you have read in your writing. We are going to
look at some good examples of citation and see how it is done. Please note, there
are two tasks this week, the quiz and moodle assignment.
1. Complete the quiz on moodle in relation to the Essay extracts and the
Bibliography below.
Essay extracts
1. Singh (2004 p.98-103) discusses two aspects of ethnic prejudice in language:
the use of an us and them division and the use of negative labelling. In thisessay, I will use these two aspects to analyse articles from The Sunnewspaper.
2. The word ethnicoriginally comes from the Greek word fornation, which canbe defined as a community which has a common history, cultural tradition andlanguage (Singh 2004 p.95).
3. According to Van Dijk (1991 cited in Singh 2004 p.101), when tabloids reportnegative topics, including crime, they tend to be over-ethnicised, while more
positive news items are de-ethnicised. However, practices may havechanged in recent years. My analysis of crime articles suggests that ethnicityis only mentioned as part of a description of a person the police are lookingfor. The ethnicity of known criminals is not reported.
4. Although explicit reference to ethnicity is now rare, the term asylum seekerappears in negative contexts, associated with terms such as scam, cheatpaedophile, and perv. Singh (2004 p.100) argues that the constantrepetition of such negative associations works to reflect and reinforce astrong perception of the dangerous outsider.
5. It seems that an us and them mentality still persists in the British tabloid press,which may reinforce a negative perception of ethnic minorities. As Singh
24
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
25/38
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
26/38
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
27/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Avoiding Plagiarism
Plagiarism means representing someone elses words or ideas as you own work.
We saw in week 3 that you have to give a reference for any ideas or information that
you use, put quotation marks when you copy the wording, and provide a
bibliographyat the end of your essay. If you dont follow these rules, then it looks like
the words and ideas are your own and so this isplagiarism.
1. You probably know that plagiarism is considered a very serious offence at
university. Why do you think that universities are so concerned about
plagiarism?
2. Compare the original passage from your course book with the five student
attempts at using it. For each one decide:
Is there any plagiarism?
If not, have they chosen a sensible way to use citation?
Original text1
Observational studies of parents conversations with their children have also
highlighted several common features in the way the interaction proceeds. Young
children are usually perceived to be incompetent turn-takers, with older
speakers having expectations that their contributions will be irrelevant or
delayed. The younger the child, the more likely their attempts to initiate a new
topic will be ignored by older speakers and the more likely they are to be
interrupted or overlapped (two speakers taking simultaneously). There is arelatively high proportion of directive and instructive talk from adults, either
by blunt commands be careful, dont do that or by talking over (talkingabout people in their presence and referring to them as we,she orhe).
Students citations
1 Stillwell Peccei, J. (2004). Language and Age, in L. Thomas, S. Waring, I. Singh, J. Stilwell Peccei,J. Thornborrow & J. Jones, Language Society and Power, 2nd edn, London: Routledge. p. 125-126
27
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
28/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
a. Observational studies of parents conversations have shown that children are
usually perceived to be incompetent turn-takers. Their attempts to initiate a new
topic will be ignored by older speakers and there is a high proportion of directive
and instructive talk from adults (Stillwell Peccei 2004 p.125).
b. Adults may expect that a childs contribution to the conversation will be irrelevant
so often interrupt or ignore them. This pattern becomes stronger with younger
children. Compared to talk with other adults, talk to children includes a high
proportion of directives.
c. The more youthful the kid, the more to be expected their effort to commence a
novel theme will be uncared for by grown-up orators and the more probable they
are to be episodic or partly covered (two speakers chatting concurrently) (Stillwell
Peccei 2004 p.125).
d. Studies of parent-child interaction show a number of typical characteristics.Young children are usually perceived to be incompetent turn-takers, with older
speakers having expectations that their contributions will be irrelevant or delayed.
The younger the child, the more likely their attempts to initiate a new topic will be
ignored by older speakers and the more likely they are to be interrupted or
overlapped (two speakers taking simultaneously). There is a relatively high
proportion of directive and instructive talk from adults, either by blunt
commands be careful, dont do that or by talking over (talking about people
in their presence and referring to them as we, she orhe (Stillwell Peccei 2004
p.125-126).
e. Interaction between parents and children often follows certain patterns. Adults
may interrupt, overlap or ignore children when they speak. Talk to children
frequently includes orders or instructions. Adults also tend to talk over children,
which means to talk about someone when they are present (Stillwell Peccei 2004
p.125-126).
3. Students often resort to plagiarism because they are overwhelmed by the work.
But thats not accepted as an excuse! You have to make sure it doesnt happento you. What study habits can help you avoid plagiarism and get good grades?
Think about the following areas:
Time management
Doing the reading
Making notes
Understanding the ideas
Approach to essay writing
28
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
29/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Defining terms & reading strategically
It is important in academic writing to use the proper terminology for the concepts you
are talking about. Indeed, you will remember that proper use of terminology is one of
the criteria we use for marking. It is a good idea to give a definition of key terms. This
makes you think about what the term means and shows your understanding. It can
also be useful because terminology is often used in different ways by different
writers. Therefore, it may be necessary to make clear what definition you are using.
NB. You will need a copy of your course book to do this weeks task.
1. Definitions are often structured like the following example. Notice that there are
four key elements.
TERM + VERB + TYPE OF THING + DEFINING
CHARACTERISTIC
Identify the same four elements in the definitions below, which are based on your
course books glossary(a list of key terms with explanations).
a. Received pronunciation is a prestige accent that is associated in Britain
with educated speakers of high social class (Mooney et al, 2011:229).
b. A linguistic varietyis taken to mean an identifiable language system
which is used in particular geographic or social situations and has its
own linguistic norms (Mooney et al, 2011:226).
c. Convergence can be defined as a process in which speakers change
their speech to make it more similar to that of the hearer (Mooney etal, 2011:222).
2. Write a definition for the following terms based on the skeleton information.
a. Crossing/ process / speakers of one group use the speech patterns of
another group
b. Speech community /group of people / members share a common
language variety and set of linguistic norms
29
An accent is defined as features of a
speakers
pronunciation
that can signal their regional or
social background.
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
30/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
3. Sometimes you will want to extend a definition into a paragraph by going into
more detail or depth. Read through the following definition paragraph to see how
this has been done. What kind of additional information has been added?
Extended definition of social class
A social class can be seen as a group of people who have similar status within a
society. The concept of social class depends on the assumption that society is
hierarchically structured such that people on each layer have similarities with
each other and are considered equal but they are different from, and not equal to,
the people on other layers (Jones 2004 p.144). However, it is difficult to say
exactly what the criteria are for this social stratification. Economic status is crucial
but other important factors include level of education or training and the extent to
which a persons job involves responsibility and management of others. For
example, working as a nurse involves a high level of skill and responsibility.
Classification schemes usually place such jobs in one of the higher levels,
despite the comparatively low salary (Jones 2004).
4. You are going to work in a group to produce a definition paragraph for one of the
following key terms: POWERorIDEOLOGY. Both of them are quite broad
concepts, which can be difficult to define. However, an extended definition of
these may well be useful for your next assignment.
As a group choose one of the concepts and make some initial notes on how you
could define it.
What kind of a thing is it?
What are the defining characteristics?
5. Using the indexin your course book, find a definition of the term. Does it match
your own ideas? Skim through the other entries on this topic to find other
information that will be useful for writing an extended definition.
6. Work together to write a short definition paragraph. It must include:
A one sentence definition, structured in the way we discussed earlier.
30
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
31/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Some of the other elements of an extended definition.
References and quotation marks as appropriate.
7. Read another groups definition and give them some short written feedback on it.
Look at the criteria for marking to help you do this. It can be positive or you canmake (polite!) suggestions for improvement.
31
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
32/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Accurate language use and proofreading
It can be difficult to focus your attention on expressing difficult ideas and writing
accurately at the same time. It is important then to make sure that you check through
your work carefully for mistakes, or you can lose valuable marks.
The following sentences include the kinds of mistakes that students often make in
their writing. Can you find the mistakes and correct them? There are 17 mistakes
altogether, including problems of punctuation, grammar, spelling and style.
1. In general Received Pronunciation may be considered prestigious however;within a certain social group the accent of dominant members might carry moreprestige.
2. There are some roles in society, which only women are supposed to take on,men are not expected enter caring professions such as nursing which oftenhave comparatively low pay.
3. 35% of the women were managers while the other 65% were men.
4. The varied languages and cultures of Britain need to be embraced by all
communities and not to suppress those that do not have a British background.
5. Being more dominant in the interaction, we can see that men are more likely tointerrupt women than other men.
6. After reading the original study, the articleremains unconvincing.
7. Regional dialects can be an indicator of social class, which may include specificgrammar and lexis as well as accent.
8. The media very often uses stereotypes with regards to the elderly.
9. The language that newspapers use effects our perception of events. It isdependant on many factors.
10.I think Whorf has a point but I dont really buy the idea of linguistic relativity.
Now check your answers on moodle.
32
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
33/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Essay planning
You need to read the following information and prepare an essay plan before the
class.
Research shows that good writers spend more timeplanning. Below is an example
outline plan for part of the essay we analysed earlier in the course. Before the class,
prepare your own essay outline for assignment 2. Make sure you include a full
thesis statement and show clearly which are the main points and supporting
points.
Essay outline
Thesis: it is nearly impossible for facts to be completely objective and accurate when put intowords
1. Lead
Definition (Bell)
Sun sympathetic to McCannso Negative connotation cops
o Presupposition police behind smears
o Capitalisation FRIDGE & PORTUGUESE
o little Maddie contrast
Times differento Cops not culprits
o smears different
2. Headline
Role of headline (Bell)
Timeso Friends in headline but not lead
Suno Focus on fridge Grab attention
o News values (quote Bell)
3. Sources
Dont inspire confidence
Similar sources
Suno More certainty
o Active voice
Timeo Less certainty
o Passive voice
33
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
34/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
Assessment Criteria: Written Work
To pass, your assignment needs to do the following:
1. Reflect some awareness of the module content.
2. Demonstrate that you have done reading relevant to the module in the content of
your essay.
3. Address the exact title given to you, or one agreed in person by your tutor.
4. Meet the required length (where word length is specified).
5. Conform to the conventions of academic writing and presentation.
6. Contain a bibliography which includes all the references that you make in your
assignment.
Having met these six pass requirements, how well you pass (i.e. the grade you get)
will be decided by how well you meet the detailed requirements given below. The
following scheme describes the qualities that we look for when we grade written work.
FIRST / A /
90-100%
In addition to meeting the requirements for a first graded between 80-89%, your work
must demonstrate:
1. The ability to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your research and
to develop that evaluation to a level not usually found in undergraduate work.
2. The ability to identify and develop interesting aspects of your research to evaluation
to a level not usually found in undergraduate work.
3. The ability to see the implications of your research for future research projects.
4. Original aspects in your approach to the topic: for example, successfully using an
analytic method not usually applied to your kind of data, or making a convincing
original claim, supported by your reading or research to a evaluation to a level notusually found in undergraduate work.
80-89%
Your work must demonstrate:
1. Evidence that you have followed the module and have a thorough and perceptive
knowledge of the module content.
2. Evidence that you have understood the issues covered by the module, and can
make links between them.
3. Evidence of having read and understood the recommended reading.
34
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
35/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
4. Evidence of having made your own literature search, and having found up-to-date
and relevant materials beyond those on your reading list.
5. A thorough understanding of the requirements of the question that you are
answering, or of the title that you are responding to.
6. An astute and comprehensive description of the linguistic background to the topic.7. A knowledge of appropriate terms and the ability to use them appropriately.
8. The ability to organise your ideas clearly and logically.
9. The ability to express what you mean clearly when you write.
10.The ability to criticise relevant published literature where appropriate and to suggest
alternative perspectives.
11.The ability to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your research and
to develop that evaluation in an original way.
12.The ability to identify and develop interesting aspects of your research.
13.The ability to see the implications of your research for future research projects.
14.Original aspects in your approach to the topic: for example, successfully using an
analytic method not usually applied to your kind of data, or making a convincing
original claim, supported by your reading or research.
70-79%
Your work must demonstrate:
1. Evidence that you have followed the module and have a thorough and perceptive
knowledge of the module content.
2. Evidence that you have understood the issues covered by the module, and canmake links between them.
3. Evidence of having read and understood the recommended reading.
4. Evidence of having made your own literature search, and possibly having found up-
to-date and relevant materials beyond those on your reading list.
5. A thorough understanding of the requirements of the question that you are
answering, or of the title that you are responding to.
6. An astute and comprehensive description of the linguistic background to the topic.
7. A knowledge of appropriate terms and the ability to use them appropriately.
8. The ability to organise your ideas clearly and logically.
9. The ability to express what you mean clearly when you write.
10.The ability to criticise relevant published literature where appropriate.
11.The ability to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your research.
12.The ability to identify and develop interesting aspects of your research.
13 Original aspects in your approach to the topic: for example, using an analytic
method not usually applied to your kind of data, or making an original claim,
supported by your reading or research.
UPPER SECOND / B / 60-69%
Your work must demonstrate:
35
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
36/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
1. Evidence that you have followed the module and have a solid knowledge of the
module content.
2. Evidence that you have understood the issues covered by the module, and can
make links between them.3. Evidence of having read and understood the recommended reading.
4. Evidence of having made your own literature search, and possibly having found up-
to-date and relevant materials beyond those on your reading list.
5. An understanding of the requirements of the question that you are answering, or of
the title that you are responding to.
6. A thorough and accurate description of the linguistic background to the topic.
7. A knowledge of appropriate terms and the ability to use them appropriately.
8. The ability to organise your ideas clearly and logically.
9. The ability to express what you mean clearly when you write.
10.The ability to criticise relevant published literature where appropriate.
11.The ability to critically comment on the strengths and weaknesses of your research.
12.The ability to produce work which is stimulating and thought-provoking.
LOWER SECOND / C / 50-59%
Your work must demonstrate:
1. Evidence that you have followed the module and have good knowledge of the
module content.2. Evidence that you have understood the important issues covered by the module.
3. Evidence of having read and understood the recommended reading.
4. A clear attempt to meet the requirements of the question that you are answering, or
of the title that you are responding to.
5. An adequate description of the linguistic background to the topic.
6. A knowledge of appropriate terms and the ability to use them appropriately.
7. The ability to organise your ideas clearly and logically.
8. The ability to express what you mean clearly when you write.
THIRD / D / 40-49%
Your work must demonstrate:
1. Evidence that you have followed the module and have knowledge of the module
content.
2. Evidence that you have understood some of the most important issues covered by
the module.
3. Evidence of having read and understood key texts from the recommended reading
list.
36
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
37/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
4. An understanding of the requirements of the question that you are answering, or of
the title that you are responding to.
5. A description of the linguistic background to the topic.
6. A knowledge of the appropriate terms and the ability to use them appropriately.
7. An attempt to organise some of your ideas clearly and logically.8. An attempt to express what you mean clearly when you write.
9. An attempt to differentiate between knowledge which is the result of well-conducted research, and knowledge which is based on intuition or personalexperience (whether your own, or anybody else's).
FAIL / F / 39% and below
If your work does not meet the six pass requirements given at the start of this grading
scheme, then the following comments will apply.
30-39% (condonable range)
Your work will show:
1. Little evidence that you have followed the module or have knowledge of the module
content.
2. Little evidence that you have understood some of the most important issues
covered by the module.
3. Little evidence of having read and understood key texts from the recommended
reading list.
4. Little understanding of the requirements of the question that you are answering, or
of the title that you are responding to.
5. Little description of the linguistic background to the topic.
6. Little knowledge of the appropriate terms and an inability to use them appropriately.
7. Little attempt to organise your ideas clearly and logically.
8. Little attempt to express what you mean clearly when you write.
9. Little attempt to differentiate between knowledge which is the result of well-
conducted research, and knowledge which is based on intuition or personalexperience (whether your own, or anybody else's).
20-29% (non-condonable range)
Your work will show:
1. Minimal evidence that you have followed the module or have knowledge of the
module content.
37
8/3/2019 Student Booklet 2011 12
38/38
Study skills booklet Language Society and Power 2011-12
2. Minimal evidence that you have understood some of the most important issues
covered by the module.
3. Minimal evidence of having read and understood key texts from the recommended
reading list.
4. Very little understanding of the requirements of the question that you are answering,or of the title that you are responding to.
5. Hardly any description of the linguistic background to the topic.
6. Minimal knowledge of the appropriate terms or how to use them.
7. An unsuccessful attempt to organise your ideas clearly and logically.
8. An unsuccessful attempt to express what you mean clearly when you write.
9. No attempt to differentiate between knowledge which is the result of well-conducted research, and knowledge which is based on intuition or personalexperience (whether your own, or anybody else's).
0-19%
Your work will be:
1. A totally incoherent piece of writing.2. Lack structure both of the content and of the sentences themselves.3. Demonstrate no relevance to the module topic.