Top Banner
ARCHIVOS DELA SOCIEDAD AMERICANA DE OFTALMOLOGIA Y OPTOMETRIA SUMARIO ACTAS DEL SECUNDUM FORUM OPHTHALMOLOGICUM Pélglna ANGEL HERNANDEZ LOZANO, M. D. INFLUENCIA DEL MATERIAL DE SUTURA EN EL ASTIGMATISMO POSTOPERACION DE CATARATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 QELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO, M. D. HIPERTENSION OCULAR DESPUES DE LA EXTRACCION DEL CRISTALINO . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 CELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO, M. D. HIPERTENSAO INTRA-OCULAR APOS EXTRACAO DO GRISTALINO 35 JOHN P. BEALE, M. D. THE USE OF INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN APHAKIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 41 HENRY HIRSCHMAN. M. D. COMPARISON OF INTRACAPSULAR AND EXTRACAPSULAR TECH- NIQUES WITH INTRAOCULAR LENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45 ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLE SECUENCIAS DE LA INTERVENCION QUIRURGICA DE LA CATA- RATA SENIL EN NUES'I'-RA PRACTICA Y SUS COMPLICACIONES 53
57

SOCIEDAD AMERICANA - Instituto Barraquer · 2020. 8. 12. · A LOS COLABORADORES Los articulos para publicacion, critica de libros, peticiones de intercam- bio y otras comunicaciones

Jan 25, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • ARCHIVOSDELA

    SOCIEDAD AMERICANADE

    OFTALMOLOGIA Y OPTOMETRIA

    SUMARIO

    ACTAS DEL SECUNDUM FORUM OPHTHALMOLOGICUM

    PélglnaANGEL HERNANDEZ LOZANO, M. D.INFLUENCIA DEL MATERIAL DE SUTURA EN EL ASTIGMATISMOPOSTOPERACION DE CATARATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    QELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO, M. D.HIPERTENSION OCULAR DESPUES DE LA EXTRACCION DELCRISTALINO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

    CELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO, M. D.HIPERTENSAO INTRA-OCULAR APOS EXTRACAO DO GRISTALINO 35

    JOHN P. BEALE, M. D.THE USE OF INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN APHAKIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 41

    HENRY HIRSCHMAN. M. D.COMPARISON OF INTRACAPSULAR AND EXTRACAPSULAR TECH-NIQUES WITH INTRAOCULAR LENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45

    ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLESECUENCIAS DE LA INTERVENCION QUIRURGICA DE LA CATA-RATA SENIL EN NUES'I'-RA PRACTICA Y SUS COMPLICACIONES 53

  • A LOS COLABORADORES

    Los articulos para publicacion, critica de libros, peticiones de intercam-bio y otras comunicaciones deben enviarse a: “Redaccion Archivos de laSociedad Americana de Oftalmologia y Optometria”, Apartado Aéreo 091019,Bogota, 8, Colombia.Los trabajos originales deben ir acompafiados de una nota indicando

    que no han sido publicados y que en caso de ser aceptados no seran ofte-cidos a otras revistas sin consentimiento de la Redacclon de la S. A. 0. 0.Deben estar escritos a maquina, a doble espacio, en una sola cara, en pa-pel tamao corriente, con un margen de 5 centimetros e ir acompaadosde una copia en carbon.E1 nombre del autor debe ir seguido de su mayor grado académico y

    colocado a continuacion del titulo del articulo. La direccion completadebe figurar al final del trabajo.Las ilustraciones deben lr separadas del escrito, numeradas en orden y

    con las leyendas en hojas aparte. El nombre del autor debe ir escrito enel reverso do las laminas y en el extremo superior la palabra “Arriba".Los graficos y esquemas deben ir dibujados con tinta china. Las micro-fotografias deben indicar el grado de aumento. Las radiografias puedenenviarse en original. Las fotografias de personas reconocibles deben iracompaadas de la notificacion de poseer autorizacion del sujeto, si es unadulto, o de los parientes si es menor.La bibliografia debe limitarse a la consultada por el autor para la

    preparacién del articulo, ir ordenada y alfabéticamente por el sistemaHarvard y abreviada de acuerdo con el World List of Scientific Publica-tion (el volumen en nmeros arabigos subrayado, y la primera pagina ennmeros arabigos):

    v. g. SCHEPENS, C. L., (1955) Amer. J. 0phthal., 38,8.Cuando se cita un libro debe indicarse el nombre completo, editorial,

    lugar y ao de la publica-cion, edicion y mimero de la pagina:v. g. RYCROFT, B. W., (1955) “Corneal Grafts” p. 9. Butterworth.London.

    Los autores recibiran pruebas de sus articulos para su correccion, y lasque alteren el contenido del texto seran a su cargo. Los autores recibirangratuitamente 50 apartes de su articulo. Los apartes adicionales se su-ministraran a precio de costo.Para anuncios comerciales dirigirse a:Casa Heller, Ltda. Apartado Aéreo 4966. Bogota - (3o1ombia_Suscripcion para un ao:

    Colombia: $ 150.00Extranjero: U.S.$ 10.00

  • - ARCHIVOS — I

    ARCHIVOS DE LA SOCIEDADAMERICANA DE OFTALMOLOGIA

    Y OPTOMETRIA

    TONSTTU

    /_ -vqv \. *5 »..-''>, **

  • INSTITUTO BARRAQUER DE AMERICA

    ARCHIVOSDELA

    SOCIEDAD AMERICANA

    OFTALMOLOGIA Y OPTOMETRIA

    Vol. 12 1977 No. 1

    BARRAUERC‘

    2| 9% "'*T/ii»*1,

    I11

    VG

    3 ‘>" ‘1“i .l',]_» 1.;2 1» ~< {I43

    E /5‘;--A \

    =5: 1' 111-~Eu NW ' *3:

    #55

    VJHW

    SECRETARIO GENERAL:ANGEL HERNANDEZ L., M. D

    SECRETARIO DE REDACCION:SALOMON REINOSO A.. M. D

    APARTADO AEREO 091019BOGOTA. (8) - COLOMBIA

  • SOCIEDAD AMERICANADE

    OFTALMOLOGIA Y OPTOMETRIA

    IUNTA DIRECTIVA1976 — 1977

    DOCTOR CARLOS TELLEZ DIAZDOCTOR ZOILO CUELLAR-MONTOYADOCTOR CARLOS WINZDOCTOR ANGEL HERNANDEZ LOZANODOCTOR ARRY CONSTANTINDOCTOR FEDERICO SERRANO GUERRADOCTOR ORLANDO ANGULO

    Secretario General: ANGEL HERNANDEZ LOZANO, M.D.Secretario de Redaccién: SALOMON REINOSO A., M. D_

    IMPRESO EN EDITORIAL ANDES - BOGOTA, COLOMBIA

  • Arch. Soc. Amer. Oftal. Optom. (1977)-12-7

    ACTAS DEL SECUNDUM FORUMOPHTHALMOLOGICUM

    INFLUENCIA DEL MATERIAL DE SUTURA EN ELASTIGMATISMO POSTOPERACION DE CATARATA

    ANGEL HERNANDEZ LOZANO, M. D.Bogota, Colombia

    El presente estudio estadistico pretende analizar comparativamente lainfluencia del material de sutura en el astigmatismo post-operacién decatarata.

    Sometirnos a consideracién 4 clases diferentes de material de sutura:la seda virgen de 3 filamentos (seda Barraquer). La seda virgen de '7 fila-mentos. E1 Perlén 10/0 de fabricacién alemana y la seda virgen 9/0 negrade fabricacién americana (Ethicon). Analizamos 20 casos para cada clasede material de sutura. Cada uno de estos casos fue intervenido de cataratade ambos ojos es decir, se estudiaron 40 ojos para cada clase de material.

    Se tomé en cuenta el astigmatismo pre-operatorio y se desconté delastigmatismo post-operatorio para obtener asi una cifra exacta del defectoinducido por la sutura imicamente.

    Observemos los resultados en las siguientes tablas:

    Tablas I-II-III y IV: seda virgen de 3 filamentos. Obsérvese la tabla IV,que contiene los promedios a los 30 dias del post-operatorio y a los 100 dias.Se anota como dato curioso que hubo un aumento del promedio astigmaticoa medida que transcurrié el post-operatorio.

    Tablas V-VI-VII y VIII: seda virgen de 7 filamentos. Obsérvese la 1'1lti-ma tabla y nétese que el astigmatismo disminuye a medida que pasa e1post-operatorio.

    7

  • ANGEL HERNANDEZ LOZANO

    Tablas IX-X-XI y XII: Perlén 10/0. Nétese el aumento en las cifraspromedio de astigrnatismo. El promedio en general aumento y se sostienepracticamente igual en el post-operatorio inmediato y en e1 tardio.

    Tablas XIII-XIV-XV y XVI: seda virgen negra 9/0 (Ethicon). Obser-vese el bajo promedio astigmatico post-operatorio tanto inmediato comotardio.

    TABLA COMPARATIVA DE PROMEDIOS

    Como lo advertimos anteriormenbe, solo la seda virgen de 3 filamentosmuestra un aumento del promedio astigmatico en el post-operatorio tardio.Este fenémeno obedece a la excesiva fragilidad y finura del material desutura el cual se hacia bodavia mas débil al ponerse en contacto con lostejidos hizmedos, por un determinado tiempo. Por esta misma razén obser-vamos con alguna frecuencia la presencia de pequeas entreaberturas pro-fundas en la herida en el post-operatorio tardio, lo cual explica el aumentodel promedio astigmatico.

    La seda virgen de 7 filamentos no presento este problema de resistenciay liubiera sido e1 material de sutura ideal de no ser por las dificultades deesterilizacion ademas del color blanco casi invisible, que obligaba a procedi-mientos de tincién con azul de metileno, para hacerla mas visible y mane-jable. Por estas razones encontrabamos con relativa frecuencia granulomascicatriciales de contenido séptico, que obligaban a. la incision conjuntivaly extraccion del material de sutura.

    Se utilizé entonces el Perlén. El resultado fue un tanto desalentador alapreciar un notorio aumento de los promedios astigmaticos post-operatoriosademas, de grados variables de hipertensién intraocular. La causa delaumento del promedio astigmatico la comprendimos al estudiar las carac-teristicas de rigidez de dicho material de sutura. Por otra parte, traia unaaguja atraumatica de un radio de curvatura mas amplio que obligaba alcirujano a tomar un puente de tejido mas grande y a hacer una asa mayorcon la consiguienbe deformacién de la superficie corneal y el estrangula-rmento de las zonas aledaiias al canal de Schlemm y demas vias de drenajey, por consiguiente, el aumento de la presion intraocular. Pudimos continnaresta hipétesis al observar un descenso de la presion ocular con el solo hechode cortar la sutura de Perlén.

    8

  • ohmX8__|OMXOo_____cotXOo__|co:XoO__I°©@_

    atX00$]cotXO06‘IO°@O_XOM_O+°©O_XOO__'_OOWXOO__

    IO|_bO_XOQOI°ON_XOQOI___

    °@®XWNO+ODQXODOI°©®X©NO|°©®XOO_|

    __8_X08'__oo_XOno‘|OIo°_‘_2_£002XOno]009XOQOIBXOQNIODXOQNI

    __oO_XOQNI009XOQNI__8_Xoo__I°8_X8__cgXOD;‘IcgXo@__|IOIooém

    O%____*UU___~_x__3U

  • °@M_XWHO‘°M@_XDEC‘°©N_09X30'°D_X@N_O|I

    °£_XOO_N|°©¢_XOO_N'OWQX002Xo©__I002XOD;IootXQ|__

    08XO?‘oomXO2‘IOIcomXO06|comX0%‘comXO06‘08

    °ONXQHO+ODNXDEOI00$XOD;+OHEEWMODNXOQO+°DNXOO__I°O®XOQOI°OmXOO_N|

    OMDXOD;I°@DX8;I03XO3‘O8XOQNI__8X_mN__'08XDB;'_00$XOD;IOQMXo©__I

    $6oo_U86onUO__O_2gOm_aU_OC0h0tQ_O_UCUh0tD__

    O_5__UEo__W

  • °O®XOQOIOOQXOQOI°O__OOOXOQOI00¢XOQOI“hm

    ogXO8‘cgXO3‘°ON_XOQNIOOQXOO_N_|OOQXOO_N|OOQXOO__

    °O®_XDN_O+°DO_X©N_O|002XOO__+IOl__8_X30'O09X26+

    __$_XDN_O+___M@_XOQOIabXQ‘;I°@XIOIDAMEXOQOIODXOO__|°©XO®__

    O8X86+8T_2wM_OMQXoo__IO92XO2I09X©N__|°©_XQ|__|O09Xo@__IohmXOQNIQ02

    86oo_O_u_O__m__a_86onUO___O__22_O2Q°_O___2£_Q°Ew__°EO___M

  • wad3;

    cgX05.0‘cgXDEC‘091XOO__‘O2XWHO‘02‘XDEC‘°©M_XOO__‘

    __@D_XO2‘°£_XOO__‘__£_X03'°8_ogXOO__‘go:XOO__‘__8__XOO__‘at

    aomXmN__IoomXmN__|IOIOO_h_2_ww__Oo_XmN__|°oo_XmN__|IOIOO_Lw“_m_

    __@NXOQT°®NXo@___|_°O@XDEC‘08X26‘__Q.

    OOQXO0_I0%XoO_|00$XONO‘;O8XONO‘°O®_X86+OWNXOQOIIOI°8_XOO__'°O®_X

    IOIo@¢XOO__‘IOIcgXOO___|°O®_XOO__|MPGoo_U8:“onUO__OB_gOm___Q

    O_U___P_8_n_OEW:UEU:w

  • °@M_XO©_¢|$2XOO_M'°OD_°D_XOno‘°@_XOO__'09‘

    agXOno‘oomwXOQOI°OO_XcgXWHO‘08X©N_o|IOI

    O09X08+°O@_XOQOI°o_X30+002XDF_O+009X30'O3XBN6’OS

    IOI°O®_XOO__|°O®_XOO__+8C2mM_IOI°O@XOO__|°@_XOO__|_°©_XOO_N_|

    IOIOUIEWM009XoO__|O09XoO__om“Xoo__IcamXoO__I°o_XOQNI°O_XO3‘

    U_U___2mEOO_“_%W_?_N__nW___m_H€D_Q___2$_oO%%___hU__%m___M

  • ‘O9XWFOI°O@_XO2‘°Ow_°OQ_XOHOI__Ow_XOQT0O:

    °O®_XOON|__°O®_XOOMI°Ow_X$9X@N__|°@®_XDN_N'°oN_XOno‘

    _°mm_XOO__|ODQXOD__IIOIOOMXO©_¢|00$XOO_W|02XOO_M|02

    °ONXOQO'OONXOQN‘‘lOI__ON__O__X36+°O__XO2‘IOI°O®_XOO_N|

    £_XDN_¢|0%X£_¢|__8_X6|__ ____8OEXODD00¢X006'00¢X@N_D|°D_X@N_©|°@_X86'

    U86onUO:O_2gO2QD_O__22_OOn%W__W*_%Ur_%Unv___W

  • °@w_

    002

    XO@_O+°@@_XOQNIatXOQO'°O®_XO2’om“

    °@D_XO@_o+°©©_XOQNIO09X09“XO@__+°@¢XOO__|°@_XOQNI

    08XO_m__|°O¢XO3‘ODNXOO__|O:XOO__|°O¢_XOO_m|asXOO_N+°O¢_

    09‘XO©_O+OD?XODO|°ON_X@NO|°ON_X©N_|0_|O_|_|°m¢XO@OQ‘XOO__°O@XQ|__OWX

    °ow_

    °ONXOO_N|°ONXOQNI°ONXDEN]__ONX86'X©N__|°O@_XOQNI°O@_XWN__|__O@_XOQNI°O®_

    UO_ 1|mvOO|O:O_p_0aOO__aO_U__2$_oOPw__M____UEx__WU

  • $6$__

    °O®_XOD_O+°OQ_XODD‘IOI°O®_XOO_+8__2wMIOI

    $5XONO‘5%XOO__|00$XMR6‘00$002Xoo__|002X8__|002XOD__|O09

    002XOQOI°O®_XOO__|°©®XOQMI00$X00¢XOQOI°O¢XOO__'__O®_XO@__|°Om_XOO_N_|

    0%X86+o°__wE09XQ___l02X@N_N|ODNX30+°©NXOQOI°O¢_XQ'__|°O¢_Xcg]cg

    OWNX30+ODNXOnO'l°O_X86'__o_X®N__IogXWho‘02X@N_O|om;XOBIOOQXQ'_O|98XO2‘08

    *0oEM:DEU:W

  • °O__XO@__+°O__XOQNI°O®°O®XO©_O+__O®XO@__|OOQX

    __8_XO06‘$9Xon?009XoO_N'09X8;‘02XO©___|092XOQOI

    OONXon?NXOn?°o_X03‘°o_°8_X86‘°8_X8;‘009XCON‘O02X OO

    02XOQMI°D_X0%‘02XOQMI02XOQMI__£_XOQT°DQ_XOQT°@N_XOQNI°DN_XOQNI

    °OD_XOQOIOOQXO©__|OONX86'°ONXOO_¢'_°O®°O@XO06‘OOQXOO_®|°O®_XO©__'°O@_XOQNIOOG

    WUO82O_U__9_2_oOMH__P__vEO%W:N

  • IO|02XOBIIOI°O\|_XOQT609

    02XO06‘°@_XO06‘°O®_X‘M:XOQMI091XOm_¢|__O@_XOD_¢|

    02XOO_N|09XOO__N|atXOi__|IOI°O_XOO__|°O®_XMNO'°O®_

    °@_XOD?‘°@_XO@_N|09XOW_|°D_X‘OI°O®_XOO_|‘OI°O®_XOO_|_

    IO|°DXoo__l°o_X26+__o_X@N_O|_009X@N_o|009X@N__|02XoO__|°©_XOQN‘002

    m°_____oo_Omg?OMD°__22oQ°2n_O_O___23_DOEW:OEo__W

  • °OD_XOO_N'¢O©_XOQNI°O@_°©_XOQNI°@_XOO_M|°O_

    °O@_X0%‘__O©_XOO_m‘°O@_XBN6]°OO_XOm'__O|_°OO_XOO_N|°DO_X©\|_O|

    __D_XOQNI°D_XOQMIOMXOO_N|°DM_XOQOI°DM_XOQTIO|°O@_

    __M®_XO@__|°@@_XOO_N|°O@_XOO___|°OD_XOD___|°@_XOQNI09XOQNI00Xoo__|ODX

    °O®_XO@__|°O®_XDN_N|°OO_XMEN‘°OO_XOQ?°M@_XQ__O|°@@_XOQ_|°O\|_XOO__|°ON_XDN__|OOQ

    O_O__22_OO_HV%_%%W__M

  • _n___¢_N

    °O®_X86+°O®_XoO_¢_|°O_XO@_¢___°O_XoD_O+°O_XOQQI°Ow_XOO__|

    __©®_XOQOI$9XO©__'OONXOO__|°©_XRho‘°©_XOQT02X@N__|°©_

    °@_XOQNI09XOQNI09XOQNIam“X009XOQNIO02X8_N|1_8_XO©_N|]°@Q_XoQN'

    °@NXO06‘°WNXoO_M|OONXDlOONX@N_M'°O®_XDN_N|009XOo_?8_XOQWI°O©_X£_?1Omw_

    °o__XmN_o|__o__X8__|__mw_Xgo‘°$_XOQToomXcogX£_o|__Oo_XoO__|__8_XO3]°O@_X3;‘comXgo‘

    D_2_2o_8:“oo_Do_U__2o_woeO@Oo__2E38a.yo°EM:DEo:W

  • 0%XOO_N|OOQXOO_¢|OOQOOGXOO__|OOQXOW_¢|OOG

    08XmN__+ou__2mM_O8XDN__+09‘XWW6‘09‘XOW__|O3X@N_O+

    °O®_XmN_O+°O_XOQOI°@_X@N_O+°@NXOO__+°O®_XOQOI°O®_XMN_O+°O®_

    ODNXD\|_O+°2_wv_m_OWNXo_m__'°DNXOSXpgoo___2mMOOMX@N_O|O3X8__|__8_

    03XO2‘O8XOQTO8XoO__|0%Xoo__|°OW_XO2‘°O@_X8;‘909X8;‘002X©N__|

    %__§_O§%mm_N

    WNW;

  • __O®_XO@_O+8__2mm_OON°O®_XOD_O+OUEEhe

    IOI°OQ_XOO__|ODNXDN_O|__$_XOD__|$2XO@_N'___MQ_XOO__|

    09XOM_O+°©_XO©_O|IOI°ON_XOQOI°O\I_XOD__|°O®_XOO__m|_°O®_

    ,8X9'6‘OONXgo‘ODNXo®__|°®NX002X30+°°_§mm_O02X30+009XOno‘

    .09XWHO‘009XWHO‘°OQ_X86'__O@_XOno‘__2__XOQT00:Xo_M__|092X8'6‘__©M_Xgo‘

    O_O___9_£_oOm__%On?W___M

  • IOIOO__m__EcomIOIOUEEas

    000XOO__|°O®XOD__|ODXOD_O|O2XOO__'OWNXO©__|$2XOO__|

    °ONXOQOI°ONXOO__IOD?XOD__|00¢XOO__|00¢XO@__'I‘OI02

    IOI°O®XOO__I00¢XOO_____8__m___E_

    08X30'0%X8__|ogX20+°°__emm_°O@_XDN_O|°O¢XONO‘°D_XOO__|°D_XOD__|

    IOI°Om_X86'__O®_XOQOI__O©_XOO__'°O®

    ____O___9_8_QOH__Ow_w"_M

  • :6o___

    °O__X30+__o_XOno‘°©_X@N_O+__O®_XOO__+009XOQO‘°O®_X®N_O+

    IOI°o_XOno‘O2XOQT09O09X26+°2_wE°DM_X30+°@m_

    OONXOD__|__ONXOO_N_|__O_XOQOI__O_XQII

    08XOWN‘03XODD‘°@_XOW_|02XOD

    °@NX86+__@NXOno‘02‘XO@_O+__m'_¢XOQOI002X8__+8____£_O09XOO__+°2_wE_°OQ_

    °©©_XWNN‘°©D_XDNMIODNXODD‘OWNX86'O0:cgXOQOIO09XOQNI__o_XO@__|°O_XO06‘OOMXOQT

    86oo_O85OOO__Os_gO2aO_UCp_£__Q_O_UcQ__0tO_O_

    osgsegwqOEWZUE:2OEW__OEo__2

    MN®__

    A_____oU___8____m:o\®Zm_OE_>3%

    E

  • _

    gnomm

    _n___;__

    $6mo;8___m_E_v__”_

    wadmad8§g__*nMD;OO_8;on

    O__O_23O__wOn_O__O_2aO_8n__U_$_U_2

    mo_n_m_s_o”_n_we___'

  • _0_£jLOwLm0N_IU_CmN:O__UOZmams

    ®_L:+_oWL®~_OZI®*CmN:o__UOCOZ_m__o_EE

    mv____Lo£$N_IOEQNZOLUQZ2°oo__E_____gO_O

    ®___{OB$N_I0EmN__O__UQZ65mm______EONQOWO____5EO_:

    M@C°_OU>hUWnoO_U___0W_mUmOk__QE_U_O

    _WOQ

  • INFLUENCIA DEL MATERIAL DE SUTlJR.\ EN EL ASTIGMATISMO

    Ultimamente hemos usado la seda virgen 9/0 negra, trenzada de lacasa Ethicon. Viene en sobres cerrados de esterilidad garantizada. Tieneun diametro muy reducido y resistencia superior a las demas suturas em-pleadas y nos ha producido el mas bajo promedio astigmatico post-operatorio.

    La ultima tabla nos ensea un cuadro comparativo de las caracteristi-cas de los materiales de sutura empleados. Las sedas tienen la caracteristicaimportante de producir necrosis parcial del tejido suturado y de reabsorberseo eliminarse con gran facilidad mas o menos en 6 meses. E1 Perlon carecede estas ventajas y por eso creemos que solamente debe utilizarse para serremovido cuando haya cumplido sus funciones de sutura.

    SUMMARY

    The author presents a statistical study to analize comparatively theinfluence of the suturing material in the postoperative astigmatism of thecataract.

    Four types of sutures are under consideration: 3-thread virgin silk,7-thread virgin silk, 10-0 perlon and 9-0 virgin silk. Twenty cases wereanalized for each type of suture in cataract operations.

    The results show that only the 3-thread virgin silk produced an increasein the astigrnatic average in the late postoperative, perhaps due to itsextreme fragility. The '7-thread silk did not present any streght problemsbut there were problems with its sterilization and visualization as well aswith its production of granulations.

    The perlon suture increased the postoperative astigmatism averagesand produced variable degrees of intraocular hypertension due to thetightness of the suture and the curved shape of the atraumatic needle.The 9-0 virgin silk (Ethicon) was the suture which produced the lowestaverage postoperative astigmatism.

    J. R.

    27

  • Arch. Soc. Amer. Oftal. Optom. (1977)-12-29

    HIPERTENSION OCULAR DESPUES DELA EXTRACCION DEL CRISTALINO

    (Traduccién al espaol del doctor Iuchen)

    CELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO, M. D.San Paulo, Brasil

    La presente comunicacion corresponde a la verificacién de presionintra-ocular elevada 7 dias después de la extraccion no complicada del cris-talino, sin que se hubiese hecho uso del alfa-quimotripsina. Hipertensionintraocular en estas circunstancias ya ha sido anteriormente descrito enla literatura. Gormaz en 1962 y posteriormente en 1973 describio valoreselevados de la presion intra-ocular en e1 periodo post-operatorio de la ex-traccion del cristalino sin que se hubiese usado alfa-quimotripsina. En 1964Kirsch afirmé que 23% de los casos operados de catarata sin la ayuda deaquella enzirna. presentaban presién intra-ocular elevada en el post-0pera-torio. Gallin y col. en 1966, demostraron el mismo hecho en 8% de los ojosoperados de catarata. Rich en 1968, demostré hiper-tension intra-ocular, 24horas después de la cirugia de catarata, sin que durante la intervenciénhubiese hecho uso de alfa-quimotripsina para extraer el cristalino. Rich ycolaboradores, en publicacién reciente, demostraron en 20 ojos operados decatarata, siempre sin la ayuda. del alfa-quimotripsina, que la presion intra-ocular se elevaba pocas horas después de la intervencién. Segn estos lilti-mos autores, la elevacién de la presién intra-ocular ocurrié en todos los20 ojos operados entre 6 y 8 horas después de la intervencion quirrgica.

    MATERIAL Y METODO

    Para esta comunicacion fueron seleccionados 178 ojos, cuya operacionde catarata fue realizada con técnica quiriirgica. semejante, siempre porel mismo cirujano, en las cuales la retirada del cristalino fue hecha con

    29

  • canso ANTONIO ma CARVALHO

    hielo y sin e1 uso del alfa-quimotripsina. Todos los ojos operados e incluidosen este trabajo no presentaban cualquier historia progresiva de glaucoma,presentaban presion intra-ocular pre-operatoria inferior a 20 mm de Hg.,no tenian cualquier signo indicativo de seudo-esfoliacion capsular, la ca-mara anterior era profunda y normal y la superficie anterior del iris pre-sentaba arquitectura normal para la edad del paciente. No presentabancualquier referencia a enfermedad ocular en el pasado. La opacidad delcristalino de toclos estos pacientes, fue considerada como de tipo senil.

    La escogencia de estos 1'78 casos quirurgicos se basé en las caracteristicasarriba enumeradas y en la técnica quirurgica realizada, de tal forma quelos procedimientos quirurgicos fueron considerados semejantes, comparables,el material de sutura siempre el mismo, el numero de puntos siempre elmismo para el eierre de la camara anterior (9 puntos aislados de sedavirgen, de Barraquer) y también los medicamentos utilizados durante ydespués del acto quirrgico.

    MEDICACION PRE-OPERATORIA:

    Instilacion de colirio de proteinato de plata al 10%, 2 veces al dia du-rante la semana que precedia la cirugia; 2 comprimidos de Diamox (aceta-solamida sodica) de 250 mg durante los 3 dias anteriores a la intervencionquirurgica.

    TECNICA QUIRURGICA

    1) Anestesia general con fluothane y entubacion endo-traqueal.2) Colocacion del blefarostato, fijacion del musculo recto superior,

    abertura de un colgajo de conjuntiva bulbar base en limbo, cauterizandosesuavemente algunos vasos sangrantes.

    3) Hechura de una incision en region del limbo esclero-corneal, colo-cacién de hilo de sutura previo a la abertura de la camara anterior en elmeridiano de las 12 horas, hechura de un alza con dicho hilo y aberturade la camara anterior con lanza; ampliacion de la incision con tijeras deBarraquer, de 0 a 180 grados; se pasan 2 puntos de sutura de seda virgen, deBarraquer, en los meridianos de 2 y 10 horas; hechura de alzas en los 3hilos pasados.

    41 Iridectomia superior en sectol-_5) Extraccion intra-capsular del cristalino con hielo.

    30

  • HIPERTENSION OCULAR DESPUES DE LA EXTRACCION DEL CRISTALINO

    6) Sutura de la incision operatoria y cierre de la camara anterior conun total de 9 puntos de seda virgen, de Barraquer. Inyeccion de aire encamara anterior.

    7) Sutura continua de la conjuntiva bulbar con hilo de seda 8-0 conaguja atraumatica.

    8) Vendaje oclusivo con ungiiento oftalmico de terramicina, solamenteen el ojo operado.

    MEDICACION POST—OPE'RATORIA

    1) Vendajes oclusivos diarios con pomada oftalmica de terramicina ypomada oftalmica de atropina al 1%.

    2) Autorizacion para dejar el lecho 48 horas después de la cirugia ypara dejar el hospital en el 4° dia después de la intervencion.

    3) Medicamentos utilizados en el 4° y el 7° dia después de la inter-vencion: colirio de atropina al 1% —2 gotas 2 veces al dia; colirio de beta-metasona al 1%_ 2 gotas 3 veces al dia.

    PRIMERA VISITA AL CONSULTORIO

    Esta primera cita fue hecha en el '7‘? dia, cuando se saco el hilo desutura de la conjuntiva bulbar. En esta oportunidad, el paciente fue siem-pre sometido a un examen biomicroscopico y su presion intra-ocular deaplanacién determinada con un tonometro de aplanacion de Goldman,adaptado a una lampara de hendidura Heag-Streit modelo 900.

    Los ojos con hipertension intra-ocular en el '79 dia del periodo post-operatorio, fueron tratados con la administracion de un comprimido deDiamox de 250 mg. (acetasolamida sodica), cada 6 horas, y un comprimidode suhstancia anti-inflamatoria (no esteroide, en general Irgapirina 1.2difenil-3.5 dioxo-4-n-butil-pirazolidina 125 mg., dimetilamina-fenildimetil-pirazolona 125 mg), 3 veces al dia. Esta medicacion fue formulada para los19 ojos que en el 7‘? dia del periodo post-operatorio presentaron presionintra-ocular elevada. Esta medicacion fue mantenida hasta el 14 dia delperiodo post-operatorio, cuando la presién intra-ocular, en general, ya habialiegaclo a valores normales. Las determinaciones de la presion intra-ocularfueron realizadas en el 14 dia (cuando, en general, la presién intra-ocularya se habia normalizado), en e1 21 (cuando en general, ya se habia inte-

    31

  • cuso ANTONIO on CARVALHO

    rrumpido la administracion de Diamox y del medicamento de accion anti-inflamatoria), 30 y 45 dias del periodo post-operatorio. Desde entoncestodos estos ojos estuvieron bajo control por un periodo de tiempo no menorde 2 aos, a través de visitas periodicas, hechas cada 3 meses.

    RESULTADOS Y COMENTARIOS

    De 178 ojos operados de catarata, seg1'1n la técnica anteriormente des-crita, sin que se hubiese hecho uso de alfa-quimotripsina, 19 ojos, 0 sea 10.61%de los mismos, presentaron hipertension intra-ocular en la primera deter-minacion de la presion realizada en e1 '79 dia del periodo post-operatorio.

    La presion intra-ocular promedio del periodo post-operatorio de los178 ojos, que corresponden a esta comunicacion, fue de 16.6 mm Hg 3.7. Porotro lado, la presion intra-ocular promedio de 153 ojos (no estan incluidos19 ojos con hipertension intra-ocular en el '79 dia del periodo post-operato-rio), en el 79 dia del periodo post-operatorio fue de 13.7 mm Hg 3.3.

    Entre las quejas presentadas por los 19 pacientes con hipertensionintra-ocular en e1 7° dia del periodo post-operatorio, deberiamos considerardiscreto lagrimeo y totofobia. (5 pacientes), ligero dolor y sensacion depeso en la region frontal correspondiente al ojo operado (5 pacientes), apesar de que estas manifestaciones no hayan sido exclusivas de los ojoshipertensos en el post-operatorio. En 11 pacientes describimos una hipe-remia de grado moderado en la conjuntiva bulbar, en 6 pacientes fue encon-trado un moderado edema superficial de la cornea, la mayoria de estoscon una incipiente distrofia endotelial, descrita en e1 periodo post-opera-torio. En casi todos los ojos con hipertension intra-ocular post-operatoriahabia un discreto Tindall, en el humor acuoso, con moderada dispersionpigmentaria, hallazgos estos comilnmente encontrados en ojos que no pre-sentaron hipertension en aquel periodo del post-operatorio. La cara ante-rior del humor vitreo se encontraba integra y plana en 8 pacientes, perorota y con cuerpo vitreo saliendo por el area pupilar en los otros 11 ojos.

    Con la medicacion adoptada, es decir, Diamox asociado a medicamen-to delaccion anti-inflamatoria, instilandose concomitantemente colirios deatroinna y cortisona, observamos normalizacion 0 baja de la presion en15 01°51 Dero 4 ojos mantuvieron todavia en el 14 dia del periodo post-0pe-ratorio valores de 20 mm Hg (casos de numero 7 y 18) y 23 mm Hg (casos de11“me1'0 10 Y 14). En estos 4 ojos la presion intra-ocular presentaba valoresmrmales en el 21 dia del Deriodo post-operatorio. Los valores determinados

    32

  • HIPERTENSION OCULAR DESPUES DE LA EXTRACCION DEL CRISTALINO

    de ahi en adelante se mantuvieron dentro de niveles normales, sin que paraeso se tuviera que hacer uso de medicamentos hipotensores oculares.

    Debido al cuadro clinico objetivo y subjetivo presentado por los 19 pa-cientes con hipertension intra-ocular post-operatoria, es dificil encontraruna justificacion para la elevacion de la presion entonces encontrada. Estahipertension intra-ocular nos parecio pobre en sus manifestaciones biomi-croscopicas, de evolucion benigna, desapareciendo rapidamente con 4 0 5dias de administracion de Diamox oral, y medicacion de actividad anti-in-flamatoria.

    Entretanto, es posible que un mayor nmero de ojos operados de cata-rata tengan elevacion de la presion intra-ocular en el periodo post-opera-torio, principalmente si los valores de la presion fueran determinados masprecozmente, como hicieron Rich y col. Por otro lado, estas verificacioneshacen que tengamos que ser prudentes en atribuir toda y cualquier hiper-tension verificada después de Ia extraccion del cristalino como debida a1uso de alfa-quimotripsina, cuando esta enzima es utilizada para ayudara la extraccion del cristalino.

    A pesar de benigna, la hipertension post-operatoria, hace que de ma-nera rutinaria la determinacion de la presion sea realizada en el periodopost-operatorio de ojos sometidos a extraccion del cristalino, sobre todocuando después de la cirugia ya no existe mas la necesidad de mantenerse elojo operado cubierto con curacion (vendaje), oclusivo, evitandose asi infec-ciones que podrian ser atribuidas a la contaminacion de las soluciones defluoresceina, utilizadas para la determinacion de los valores de aplanacionde la presion intra-ocular.

    SUMARIO

    En 178 ojos operados de catarata con la técnica quirrgica referida, sinel auxiiio de la inyeccion de alfa-quimotripsina, en el espacio retro-iriano,se observo hipertension intra-ocular en 19 ojos (10.61%). La hipertensionintra-ocular tratada con la administracién de Diamox y drogas anti-infla-matorias determino la normalizacion o baja de la presion intra-ocular enla mayor parte de 10s ojos hipertensos en el '79 dia del periodo post-ope-ratorio.

    33

    3 — ARCHIVOS —- I

  • Arch. Soc. Amer. Oftal. Optom. (1977)-12-35

    HIPERTENSAO INTRA - OCULAR APosEXTRACAO no GRISTALINOCELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO, M. D.*

    Sao Paulo, Brasil

    A presente comunicagéo corresponde a verificacio de pressao intra-ocularelevada 7 dias apos a extragio néo complicada do cristalino, sem que se tivessefeito uso de alfa-quimotripsina. Hipertensao intra-ocular nestas circunstancias jatem sido anteriormente descritas na. literatura. Assim, Gormaz em 1962 1 e posterior-mente en 19732 descreveu valores elevados da presséo intra-ocular no periodopos-operatorio da extracao do cristalino sem que t-ivesse feito uso de alfa-quimo-tripsina. Em 1964, Kirach3 afirmou que 23% dos casos operados de catarata semauxilio daquele enzima apresentavam presséo intra—0cu1ar elevada no pos-operatorio.Gallin e colabs.4 em 1966 demonstraram 0 mesmo fato em 8% dos olhos operadosde catarata. Rich 5 em 1968 demonstrou hipertenséo intra-ocular 24 horas depois daoperacio de catarata sem que durante a intervencio tivessem feitao uso de alfa-quimotripsina para extrair 0 cristalino. Rich e colabs.6 em publicacao recentedemonstraram em 20 olhos operados de catarata, sempre sem 0 auxilio dc alfa-quimotripsina, que a presséo intra.-ocular se elevava poucas horas apos a. intervencéo.Segundo éstes iiltimos Autores, a elevacéo da pressao intra-ocular ocorreu em todos0s 20 olhos operados entre 6 e 8 horas apos a intervencéo cirrgica.

    Material e métodoPara esta comunicacio foram selecionados 178 olhos, cuja operaciio de catarata

    foi realizada com tecnica cirfirgica semelhante, sempre pelo mesmo cirurgiao, nasquais a retirada do cristalino foi feita com gelo e sem 0 uso de alfa-quimotripsina.Todos os olhos operados e incluidos neste trabalho nio apresentavam qualquerhistoria pregressa de glaucoma, apresentavam presséo intra-icular pré-operatoriainferior a. 20 mm. de Hg., nio tinham qualquer sinal indicativo de pseudo-esfoliagéocapsular, a camara anterior era profunda e normal e a superficie anterior da. irisapresentava arquitetura normal para a idade do paciente. N50 apresentavamqualquer referéncia a doenca ocular no passado. A opacidade de cristalino de todoséstes pacientes foi considerada. como sendo de tipo senil.

    * Professor adjunto de Clinica Oftalmologica da Facultade, de Medicina da Univer-sidade de Sao Paulo.

    35

  • cm.s0 ANTONIO ms CARVALHO

    A escolha déstes 1'78 casos cirurgicos foi haseada nas caracteristicas acimamencionadas e na tecnica cirurgica realizada, de tal forma que os procedimentoscirurgicos foram julgados semelhantes, comparaveis, o material de sutura sempre0 mesmo, o numero de pontos sempre o mesmo para fechamento da camaraanterior (9 pontos isolados com seda virgem de Barraquer), assim como tambémos medicamentos utilizados durante e apos 0 ato cirrgico.

    Medicagéo pré-operatdria

    Instilagao de colirio de proteinato de prata a 10% instilado 2 vezes ao diadurante a semana que precedia a cirurgia; 2 comprimidos de Diamox (acetasolamidasédica) de 250 mg. durante os 3 dias anteriores a intervengéo cirurgica.

    Tecnica cinlrgica

    1) Anestesia geral com Fluothane e entubaqéo endo-traqueal.

    2) Colocagao de blefarostato, fixagao do musculo reto superior, abertura deum retalho de conjuntlva bulbar de base limbica, cauterizando-se suavementealguns vasos sangrantes.

    3) Feitura de um sulco na regiéo do limbo esclero-corneano, passagem de umfio de sutura prévio a abertura da camara anterior no meridiano de 12 horas,feitura de uma alga com o referido fio e abertura da camara anterior com langa;ampliagao da inciséo com tesoura de Barraquer de 0 a 180 graus; passados doispontos de sutura de seda virgem de Barraquer nos meridianos de 2 horas e 10horas; feitura de algas nos 3 fios passados.

    4) Iridectomia superior em setor.5) Extragao intra-capsular do cristalino com gelo.6) Sutura da inciséo operatoria e fechamento da camara anterior com um

    total de 9 pontos de seda virgem de Barraquer. Injego de ar na camara anterior.7) Sutura continua da conjuntiva

    atraumatica.bulbar com fio de seda 8-0 com agulha

    8) Curativo oclusivo com pomada oftalmica de terramicina, somente do olhooperado.

    Medicagao pos-operatoria

    1) Curoftalmica de atropina a 1%.

    2) A11t°1'1Z

  • IIIPEITKKSAO l'§‘l'lL\-0Cl.'L\l APOS EXTRACAO DO ClllS‘l'_!.l.[.\'O

    Pivneimvisitaaoconsultorio

    Btu primeira visits foi feita no 7° din. quando o fio de sutura da oonjuntivabulbar foi removido. Nesta oomsio. 0 paciente foi sempre suhmetido a mn emmebhmjcrosoopioo e a sun p1'x

  • CELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO

    Com a medicaoao adotada, isto é, Diamox associada a medicamento de acaoanti-inflamatéria, instilando-se concomitantemente colirios de atropina. e cortisone,observamos normalizagao ou baixa da. press.-Z10 em 15 olhos, porém 4 olhos manti-veram ainda no 14° dia do periodo pos-operatério valores de 20 mm. de Hg. (casosde numero 7 e 18) e 23 mm. de Hg. (casos de numero 10 e 14). Nestes 4 olhos apresséo intra-ocular apresentava valores normais no 21*? dia do periodo p6s-opera-tério. Os valores determinados dai em deante se mantiveram dentro de niveisnormais, sem que para tanto se tivesse que fazer uso de medicamentos hipotensoresoculares.

    Em face do quadro clinico objetivo e subjetivo apresentado pelos 19 pacientescom hipertensao intra-ocular pés-operatéria é dificil encontrar uma justificativapara a elevacéo da pressao entéo encontrada. Esta hipertensao intra-ocular nospareceu pobre em suas manifestacoes biomicroscépicas, de evolugéé benigna, desapa-cendo rapidamente com 4 ou 5 dias de administragéo de Diamox oral e medicaoiode atividade anti-inflamatoria.

    No entanto, é possivel que maior numero de olhos operados de catarata tenhamelevaoéo da presséo intra-ocular no periodo pés-operatério, principalmente se osvalores da. presséo forem determinados mais precocemente, como fizeram Rich eCo1ab.6. Por outro lado, estas vericacées fazem com que tenhamos que ser prudentesem atribuir toda e qualquer hipertensao verificada apos extracéo do cristalino comodevida a/o uso de alfa-quimotripsina, quando este enzima é utilizado para auxlliara extragéo de cristalino.Embora benigna a hipertensao pos-operatoria, faz com que de modo rotineiro

    a determinagio da presséo seja realizada no periodo pos-operatorio de olhos subme-tido a extracao do cristalino, sobretudo quando apés a cirurgia ja néo existe maisnecessidade de se manter o élho operado coberto com curativo oclusivo, evitando-seassim infeccoes que poderiam ser atribuidas a contaminaoéo das solucées de uo-resceina utilizadas para a determinaoao dos valores de aplanaoao da. pressao intra-ocular.

    Sumdrio

    Em 1'78 olhos operados de catarata com a tecnica cirurgica referida, sem 0auxio de injecao de alfa-quimotripsina no espaco retro-iriano, observou-se hiper—tenséo intra-ocular em 19 olhos (10.61%). A hipertensao intra-ocular tratada coma administracéo de Diamox e drogas anti-inflamatorias determinou a normalizagaoou baixa da presséo intra-ocular na maioria dos olhos hipertensos no '7‘? dia doperiodo pos-operatério.

    SUMIVLARY

    The present study describes rise of the intraocular pressure in 19 eyes out of178 eyes which occured on the 7th post-operative day of a non-complicated cataractextraction without the use of alfa-chymotrypsin. The rise of the intraocular pres-sure was treated with Diamox and anti-inflamatory drugs and nonnalization oftheir values was obtained in a few days.

    38

  • __EOO__~8dEdu5|Sg+“saga

    3_N+Q2.g_M+

    3:Q:3:;

    22SSS228

    M:2EW2NH2NH

    222Q22SMN

    22S232NHWN8

    NH22¢Q222MNg

    3S22322225

    2g8QNan2222QNMS

    23S2EONS::HHgS

    SS2NH5S3S23“NS_H

    322352_E_E8dam_gEE3_gE_EwwdugA8EU°§_o_H_msaw

    “Eom‘wean“Eamgasgig

    @€QDOO‘§OmaONNOSQENROIWOR

    §_m_§_2Sm

  • CELSO ANTONIO DE CARVALHO

    SUMMARY

    The present paper deals with the presence of high intraocular pressure 7 daysafter the uneventful extraction of the lens.

    One hundred and seventy eight eyes, operated by the same surgeon using thesame surgical technique, were studied. The extraction of the lens was done usingcryo and without the use of alfachimotripsine.

    All the eyes mentioned in this paper were clinically normal. Intraocular hyper-tension was observed in 29 eyes (10.61%). This hypertension was treated withDiamox and anti-inflamatory drugs, resulting in normalization or decrease of theintraocular pressure in most of the hypertense eyes on the 7th day of the postope-rative period

    J. R.

    BIBLIOGRAFIA

    1. GORMAZ, A.: Ocular Tension after Cataract surgery, with special Referenceto the Penomenon of late Hypotony. Am. J. Ophth., 53: 832-841. 1962.

    2. GORMAZ, A., apud. RICH, W. J. and c01abs.: Early ocular hypertension aftercataract extraction. Brit. J. Ophthal., 58: 725-731, 1974.

    3. KIRSCH, R. E.: Further studies on glaucoma following cataract extractionassociated with the use of alpha-chymotrypsin. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthal.Otolar. 69: 1011-1023, 1965.

    4. GALLIN, M. A., BARASCH, K. R. and HARRIS, L S.: lntraocular PressureFollowing cataract extraction. Amer. J. Ophthal., 61, 690-702. 1966.

    5. RICH, W. J., apud. RICH, W. J. and c01abs.: Early ocular hypertension aftercataract act extraction. Brit. J. Ophthal., 58: 725-731, 1974.

    6. RICH, W. J., RADTKE. N. D. and COHAN, B. E.: Early ocular hypertensionafter cataract extraction. Brit. J. Ophthal., 58: 725-751, 1974.

    40

  • Arch. Soc. Amer. Oftal. Optom. (1977)-12-41

    THE USE OF INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN APHAKIA

    JOHN M. BEALE, Jr., M. D.San Francisco, EE. UU.

    Virtually all ophthalmologists would agree that the ideal solution toaphakia would be the replacement of the defective human lens with a clearprosthetic intraocular device. While acknowledging that aphakia presentsspecific problems for the patient, ophthalmologists have no unaminity ofopinion for the proper RX of surgical aphakia. Aphakic glasses with suchdisadvantages as excessive magnification and defective side vision arecertainly not the perfect answer. Contact lenses, hard or soft, are a partialsolution with only 1/3 of the magnification of spectacles and essentiallynormal side vision. However, contact lenses are not always feasible and likespectacles do not offer the possibility of satisfactory 24 hour vision. Withoutthem the patient is reduced to bare traveling vision. Keratophakia, thebrillant technique of refractive keratoplasty developed by doctor Jose Barra-quer eliminates most of the difficulties of both glasses and contact lensesbut it requires donor tissue, time, skill and instrumentation beyond thelimits of most of the world’s ophthalmologists.

    Why then has intraocular lens implantation not been embraced withenthusiam by cataract surgeons since the existing need is so apparent? Itis the purpose of this presentation to explain this paradox.

    Following the initial lens implantation successes of Harold Ridley asreported in the early 1950's a number of the world's surgeons attempted tofollow his lead. The technique of the time called for the placement of alens fifteen times the weight of current lenses and with no intrinsic meansof support. The heavy and bulky Ridley lens, without hooks, loops, irisconfiguration or sutures relied on capsular support and at times even onlyon vitreous support to maintain its proper position within the eye. Manyof these lenses became subluxated within the eye causing irregular damage.Hindsight is inevitably better than foresight and its hardly fair to judge

    41

  • JOHN P. BEALE

    doctor Ridleys’ work adversly. He had demonstrated that clinical qualitypolymethymethaculate could be tolerated in the human eye and now 25years later some of these first lenses are still providing good vision forthe patient bearers. Though no longer leading, doctor Ridley shined thelight along the path and others pursued his course. Utilizing polymethy-methaculate, Strampelli, Dannheim and others attempted to obtain supportby struts in the anterior chamber. Their first blush of success faded withthe development of a particularly malignant type of endothelial cornealdistrophy. Intermittent corneal touch led to regional edema and endothe-lial cell depopulation which in time affected the entire corneal metabolism.Keratoplasty for this dystrophy was notoriously unsuccessful. Neverthelesseven to this time a very carefully contoured angle support lens is in suc-cessful use by Peter Choyce of England.

    Late in the 50’s several ophthalmic surgeons, including Binkhorst ofthe Netherlands, conceived of pupillar support lenses with loops anteriorand posterior to the iris. These loops impinged in such a fashion as tocompletely support the lens. Fixation was often encouraged by mioticswhich in turn produced atrophy of the sphincter as the loop bases cut intothe iris stroma. Even with these loop-lenses endothelial corneal distrophyoccurred sometimes years after lens placement. Careful studies have demos-trated that if a lens is inserted with anterior loops, the total lens lengthshould be longer that 8 milimeters and because of lateral rotation of theeye it is safer still to align the anterior loops vertically. Despite these variousforms of attachment, subluxation still occurred with potential risk to the eye.

    More recently Worst of the Netherlands has created a lens which issupported either by a suture in the iris or by fixation through and iridec-tomy with a platinum clip. With this support he has been able to discardthe anterior loops.Doctor Binkhorst has also created a lens which has elimated the anterior

    loops. After performing a planned extracapsular extraction the posteriorloops are permitted to adhere to the posterior capsule while iris adhesionsare discouraged by periodic dilating.

    The various advantages and disadvantages of intracapsular cataractsurgery versus extracapsular lens surgery are material for an entire pre-sentation. It should be noted that the planned extracapsular procedure ofEurope can be sophisticated by utilizing certain steps of the Kelmanphacoemulsification procedure as performed in the United States.

    This series of slides will illustrate the problem as presented with thesolution in each stage of advancement of the intraocular lens

    42

  • THE USE OF INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN APHAKIA

    A more satisfactory need for the correction of aphakia is acknowledgedby most ophtalmologits. Progressive problem solving in the development ofthe intraocular lens has been demonstrated. The major problems havebeen solved though residual more minor difficulties remain. The normalhuman resistance to change necessary scientific evaluations has slowedacceptance of prosthetic lens replacement in the past. Now an increasingnumber of opthalmologists are utilizing intraocular lenses because theybelieve the advantages to the patient far outweigh the slightly increased risk.

    SUMMARY

    Aphakia would be ideally solved by replacement of the lens with a clearintraocular device. However, proper Rx of surgical aphakia is still in question.Aphakia glasses and contact lenses (hard or soft) have their disadvantages,as well as ketratophakia, which, even though it eliminates most of thedifficulties of the above mentioned, requires donor tissue, time, andsuperior skill and instrumentation.

    Harold Ridley introduced lens implantation in the early 1950’s. TheRidley lens, weighing 15 times that of a current lens, relied on capsularsupport and at times on vitreous support alone to maintain proper position.

    Strampelli, Dannheim, and others, follow the path of Ridley’s tech-nique; attempts were made using polymethylmethachrylate to obtain supportby stryts in the anterior chamber. But complications followed, such as amalignant type of endothelial corneal distrophy, regional edema andendothelial cell depopulation.

    In the late 50’s several surgeons introduced a pupillary support lens withloops anterior and posterior to the iris. Even with complete support of thelens, endothelial corneal distrophy ocurred. Various forms of attachmentswere introduced, still with potential risk to the eye.

    Recently, the anterior loop has been discarded, being replaced byeither a suture in the iris or fixation through iridectomy with platinumclip. Binkhorst has also created a lens which discourages iris adhesionsand permits posterior loops to adhere to the posterior capsule. The majorproblems of intraocular lens development have been solved, and anincreasing number of opthalmologists are now using these lenses, believingthat their advantages to the patients far outweigh the risk involved.

    J. M.

    43

  • Arch. SOC. Amer. Oltal. Optom. (1977)-12-45

    COMPARISON OF INTRACAPSULAR ANDEXTRACAPSULAR TECHNIQUES WITH

    INTRAOCULAR LENSES

    HENRY HIRSCHMANLong Beach, U.S.A.

    It is a great pleasure to be in Bogota again. I came once before to visitthe Instituto Barraquer only, and was pleasantly surprised to see what alovely city was, but the Institute and its incredible director, José Barraquer,would have been more than enough to justify the visit. We have cometogether, ophthalmologists from all over the world, to present our work,to exchange ideas, and to study with each other, but we are here becauseof the towering genious and incredible energies of José Barraquer, andI am honored to be on this program. I salute doctor Barraquer. We are indebt to him for more than you may realize, in addition to the advanceshe has made to the microsurgery of the anterior segment with his microscope,instruments, and techniques. His tireless, dedicated, continuous animalsurgery has single handedly kept the rabbit population under control.

    In this brief presentation, one cannot outline the history of intraocularlenses; much will have to be assumed, but at least one major point can bebrought about. LENS implant surgeons are strongly moving towards extra-capsular cataract extractions. I think that those who do not do lens implan-tations will soon recognize the reason for this trend. The first intra-ocularlens required a meticulous planned extra-capsular cataract extraction whenit was clone by Harold Ridley in 1949. That 200 miligram lens was much toolarge to be supported by the posterior capsule and minor dislocations allowedit to rest on the ciliary body, therefore causing a chronic cycnitis, or toclose off the angle by resting on the iris root, or to cause a secondaryglaucoma, or to cause iris atrophy or corneal dystrophy, but worst of all,

    45

  • HENRY HIRSCHMAN

    when the posterior capsule gave way and dislocations occurred into thevitreous the result was usually a lost eye. When capsular fixation did takeplace, and it did in the majority of cases, these lenses proved to be mostuseful. Many are still giving their bearers good vision after 20 years andmore. The lens is significant in that it initiated the concept of pseudophakiaand it proved the long term tolerance of pure methyl methacrylate. Disloca-tions were so feared that the next lenses were designed so as to makedislocations impossible. Rigid one-piece methyl methacrylate angle-sup-ported lenses were developped by Strampelli, Choyce, Ridley, and others.Anterior chamber lenses with flexible supports in the chamber angle weredevelopped by Danheim, Leib, and Joaquin Barraquer. It was possible toinsert a lens either as a primary procedure at the time of the cataractextraction, as Ridely prefers to do, or secondary implantation after the eyehas recovered from the cataract extraction and the refraction is known, asis preferred by Choyce. There were a great number of these lenses and allof us I’m sure are familiar with disasters that occurred with their use.Particularly tragic is the experience of Joaquin Barraquer, whose great giftsas a surgeon were not enough to overcome the inherent defects in theseearly lenses. He fell victim to his early enthusiasm and used several hundredsof the angle supported lenses in the 50's and early 60’s, only to realize tohis dismay that most of them were going to have to be removed and manyof the eyes were lost. That so great a surgical calamity should befall a manwhose surgical skills have few peers compounded the disaster. It was indeedthe experience of Joaquin Barraquer that cooled the enthusiasm of mostophthalmologists around the world for a decade.

    A few persisted with the intriguing idea. The concept of iris support forthe lens was first advanced by Edward Epstein of Johannsburg with thismodified Ridley lens. It was in the shape of a pulley wheel with a slotdesigned to accommodate the iris. The demanding role of the iris was tosupport this monster but the Weight of the lens was overpowering. Veryfew used, it perhaps less than a dozen, for it was abandoned in favor of theMaltese Cross Lens also designed by Edward Epstein. This lens was introducedin the U.S. under the name of the Copeland lens in 1967_ It received anextensive clinical trial which was marvelously well documented in a coope-rative study headed by Norman Jaffe 8: the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute.I have used very few of these lenses and will defer a comment on them tothose who have greater experience. My objections to this iris-plane lensare: it causes a relative pupilary block; it has a wide area of iris contactand therefore, a very low-grade iritis; there is pressure and ultimately

    46

  • COMPARISON OF INTRACAPSULAR AND EXTRACAPSULAR

    pressure atrophy of the iris, and macular edema occurs in approximately10% of cases.

    The iris clip lens of Binkhorst was developed in 1957 and used in1958. The results reported by Binkhorst with this lens were so encouragingthat I began to use it in 1967. I am not by nature a patient man, yet Iwaited and watched the development of intra-ocular lenses 8 years beforedoing my first case. Hardly a reckless plunge. This lens is intended for usewith intra-capsular cataract extractions. It can be used with extra-capsularcases but in extra-capsular cases the anterior loops are superfluous andBinkhorst designed the 2-loop lens for that purpose. The problems associatedwith the Binkhorst Iris Clip lens were dislocation and corneal touch leadingto dystrohpy. Rare but disturbing cases. In order to avoid the possibilityof loop touch it was desirable to design a lens that had no loops in theanterior chamber. This followed Jan Worst’s concept of suturing the lensin place. Mackensen had been using Tubingen nylon for the repair ofsphincterotomys and sutured the iris’ with that material a decade before itwas used to suture lenses in place. At first, the 4-loop lens itself wassutured to the iris which made it unnecessary to use Pilocarpine and thisavoided the occassional iritis from mechanical irritation that Pilocarpinecaused. Another problem with the use of Pilocarpine is sphincter erosion.Once the lens was sutured to the iris no miotics were necessary. But neitherwere the anterior loops. The posterior loops were to prevent anterior disloca-tion and the anterior loops were to prevent posterior dislocation but oncethe lens was sutured there was no need for anterior loops. Since anteriorloops were capable of touch with its serious consequence it was a greatstep forward to modify the lens design in this way. Here are a few prelimi-nary steps in this development. I suture the body of the lens to the iristhrough 0.1 mm. holes. All I can say for this concept is that it is possibleto do so but it is very much like catherizing a cockroach and I gave it up.The lens that utilizes this concept efficiently and effectively is the MedallionLens of Jan Worst manufactured by Medical Workshop. It is one of themost popular lenses every devised and has received extensive use. I haveused several hundred of these lenses and Jan Worst has used close to 1,000.One defect in the concept with this lens is that one is dependent on a finenylon suture. I never trusted 23 micron nylon and have been using 9-0supramid which I believe will last many years. I have had one suturefailure which I believe was from suturing the lens too tightly and I believethe suture failed because of chaffing and not because of some inherentflaw in the suture itself.

    47

  • HENRY HIRSCHMAN

    In 1963 Binkhorst started to do lens implants after extra-capsularprocedures. He designed a 2-loop lens that was called the irido-capsularlens because it was designed to be held in place by adhesions between theiris and the lens and between the iris and the capsule and the lens loopsand the capsule. These did occur and kept the lens from dislocating but itwas not a very elegant appearing eye, and the pupil would not fully dilate.

    With the development of phakoemulsication in the United States, theextra-capsular procedure came into its own. It had long been recognizedthat the extra-capsular was a very useful procedure to avoid retinal detach-ments in myopes, and to protect corneas from vitreous touch. In additionto these advantages, preserving the posterior capsule and remants of theanterior capsule provide the firmest possible support for an intra—ocularlens. Under microsurgical techniques with either a planned extra-capsularor a phakoemulsification, remnants of the anterior capsular are preservedand the lens loops are inserted in the cleft between the anterior capsuleand the posterior capsule. Adhesion occurs between these capsule remnants,trapping the lens. This fixation occurrs usually in 3 or 4 days. I have a seriesof slides here illustrating the dilatation that has taken place on the 5thpost-operative day. This allows for a lens that is permanently centered,that has no dependence on pupil size, that permits full dilatation of thepupil and examination of the posterior pole. Pilocarpine is used only for4 days post-operatively.

    The major advantages of extra-capsular procedures center around thebetter control of the vitreous. When detachments occur, after an extra-capsular cataract extraction, they are rarely if ever, of the typical aphakictype with multiple small holes in the periphery. Unfortunately sometimesthe peripherial capsule looses its transparency and examination of the farperipheral retina may be difficult. Some retinal surgeons would prefer usnot to do extra-capsular for this reason.

    I well remember the debate that raged in the early 60’s about roundpupil cataract extraction vs sector iridectomies. At that time the retinaldetachment surgeons were begging us to return to the wide sector iridectomyapproach so that if a retinal detachment did occur it could be more readilytreated. Castroviejo answered that most succinctly by saying that the kindof cataract extraction you do is determined by the complications you wishto treat. If you wish to protect the cornea then you do a round pupilextraction, if you wish to protect the retina then you do a sector iridectomy.The logic of doing 100% of your cases one Way to avoid a complication that

    48

  • COMPARISON OF INTRACAPSULAR AND EXTRACAPSULAR

    occurs in 2% of cases is difficult to accept. Besides, our retinal detachmentmen seem to have learned how to work with round pupils and the resultsof retinal surgery today is far better than even the most optimistic predic-tions of a decade ago. Similarily I would say that while overwhelming statis-tical evidence is not available to support this contention, it is a firm clinicalconviction on the part of many lens implant surgeons that retinal detach-ments occur with significantly less frequency after extra-capsular cataractextraction than they do after intra-capsular extraction. Furthermore, evenwith an undilatable pupil the majority of retinal detachments can be succes-sfully treated. We are therefore asked to modify our technique for thepotential benefit of one patient in perhaps 500.

    A very real problem in cataract surgery is the occurrance of macularedema. After intra-capsular extraction, macular edema occurs in a highlysignificant number of cases. Studies involving routine fluorescein angio-graphy of all cases shows at least a transient macular edema in as highas 70% of cases. Preliminary studies by Jaffe would indicate that thepresence or the absence of an intra-ocular lens of the Binkhorst type doesnot significantly affect the incidence of macular edema. It is however,sharply reduced where extra-capsular cataract extractions have veenperformed.

    In my overall series of intracapsular extractions with lens implants,clinically significant macular edema ocurred in 3.5% of cases; with extra-capsulars it is barely 1%.

    Retinal detachments ocurred in just over 2% of intracapsulars andagain 1% of extracapsulars.

    SUMMARY

    One major point about intra-ocular lenses is that lens implant surgeonsare strongly moving towards extra-capsular cataract extractions.

    In 1949 Ridley’s first intra-ocular lens required a meticulous plannedextra-capsular cataract extraction. The 200 miligram lens could not besupported by the posterior capsule. Minor dislocations allowed it to reston the ciliary body, causing chronic cyclitis, or to rest on iris roots, causingclosure of the angle secondary glaucoma, iris atrophy, or corneal dystrophy.

    49

    4 — nncruvos -1

  • HENRY HIRSCHMAN

    When the posterior capsule gave way, causing dislocations in thevitreous, the result was usually a lost eye.

    However, in the majority of cases, capsular fixation did take placeresulting in good vision for their bearers, 20 years and more later. Thisproves the long time tolerance of methylmethachrylate.

    Fearing dislocations, Strampelli, Choyce and others, produced rigidone-piece angled support lenses, while Joaquin Barraquer and othersintroduced lenses with flexible supports in the chamber angle.

    Ridley preferred insertion of the lens at the time of the cataractextraction, and Choyce’s preferrance was to do the implantation afterrecovery from the cataract extraction, and the refraction was known.

    Joaquin Barraquer, a gifted surgeon, after using several angle-supportlenses in the 50's and early 60’s, was led to dismay by the defects in theseearly lenses. Due to his tragic experience, many of the ophthalmologistsaround the world lost enthusiasm for a decade. A few persisted, and amodified Ridley lens was introduced by E. Epstein. Few were used due tothe demanding role of the iris in supporting the heavy lens, and wasabandoned for the Maltese Cross lens, also a design of Epstein.

    In 1967 it was introduced in the U.S. as the Copeland lens. DoctorHirschmann’s objections to this lens are: It causes a relative pupillary block,it has a wide area of iris contact, and there is pressure atrophy of the irisand a macular edema in approximately 10% of cases.

    In 1951 the iris clip lens was developed by Binkhorst. It is intended foruse with intra-capsular cataract extractions but it can be used with extra-capsular cases. Dislocation and corneal touch leading to distrophy, occurred.To avoid loop touch it was necessary to design a lens with no anteriorloops. Tubingen-Nylon was then used to suture the lenses in place. At firstthe 4-loop lens was sutured to the iris. With this, Pilocarpine was notnecessary, avoiding iritis and sphincter erosion; miotics were not necessaryand neither were anterior loops.

    In 1963 Binkhorst began doing lens implants after extra-capsular pro-cedures. The 2 loop lens, called the iris capsular lens, kept from dislocating,but the eye was not very elegant, and the pupil did not fully dilate.

    Phakoemulsification has been recognized as a procedure to avoid retinaldetachment, in myopes, and to protect corneas from vitreous touch.

    50

  • COMPARISON OF INTRACAPSULAR AND EXTRACAPSULAR

    Major advantages of extra-capsular extraction are prevention of retinaldetachments and better vitreous control. Sometimes the peripheral capsuleopaques and fundus examination becomes difficult. To avoid complicationsthe logical way to operate is to perform 100% of the cases in the same way,with a resulting 2% complication. A problem in cataract surgery is theoccurances of macular edema, which is sharply reduced in the performanceof extra-capsular extraction.

    With lens implantation, retinal detachment occurred in 2% of intra-capsulars and in 1% of extra-capsular.

    J. M.

  • Arch. Soc. Amer. Oftal. Optom. (1977)-12-53

    SECUENCIAS DE LA INTERVENCION QUIRURGICADE LA CATARATA SENIL EN NUESTRA PRACTICA

    Y SUS COMPLICACIONES

    ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLE, M. D.Lima, Pen’:

    1—Se aprecia los dos puntos para la 2—En esta vista estamos tomando elabertura palpebral a dos 0 tres mm recto superior a través de la conjuntivadel borde de estos y en su parte central. y se esta pasando un hilo para ejercerObservamos la dilatacidn pupilar a ba- accién sobre este rmlsculo y asi conse-se de midriaticos tipo atropina, -neo- guir la luzacidn del globo ocular haciasinefrina 0 tropicamida. abajo.

    3—Los puntos separados que estan mar-cados en esta jigura y que ocupan elsemicirculo del limbo esclero-corneal ylos Zaterales ligeramente oblicuos, indi-can el corte conjuntival que se debehacer.

    53

  • ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLE

    4—Aqui se ve cémo la conjuntiva estareplegada hacia la parte superior delfornix, fuera del verdaaiero campo ope-ratorio. El globo del ojo debe ser fijadocon una presion hacia las seis a tresmm del limbo esclero-corneal. El primercorte que estamos practicando, clebeser hecho con el cuchillete en jormavertical sobre el plano del globo ocular.Este corte debe ser continuo y sin pro-fundizar en el espesor de la incision,como se ve en el angulo superior dere-cho y debe ir para el ojo derecho, deizquierda a derecha y para el ojo iz-quierdo. También de izquierda a dere-cha para los que no son ambideztros.

    5—E'n esta figura apreciamos como elcuchillete o la lanza en forma plana yparalela al globo ocular termina con elsegundo corte, de profundizar la inci-sion, en una extension de tres 0 cua-tro mm. En el dngulo inferior de estavista, se aprecia hasta donde llega elsegundo corte, atravesando toda la in-cision, de esta /orma hemos obtenidoun bisel de ajustamiento, tanto en elborde corneal como en el escleral.

    6—En esta toma apreciamos la termi-nacidn de la incision con las tijerasde cornea de Jose‘ Ignacio Barraquer.La incision debe llegar de X a II; nohay inconveniente de hacerla de IX aIII, para no repetir los hilos de aber-tura palpebral y la del recto superior.Comenzamos a no considerarlos en losprozimos cliapositivos. Esta s0breenten-dido que estamos marcando solamenteen /orma clara y amena los mementosmas resaltantes de la intervencidn qui-rurgica de la catarata senil.

  • SECUENCIAS DE LA INTERVENCION QUIRURGICA

    7—Hecha la abertura cornea-escleral. 8—Aqui se aprecia la lazada que prepa-procedemos a pasar un hilo en el centro ramos para dejar el campo de aberturade la incisién, que debera tomar en lo libre.posible la parte media de ambos biseles,como en el pequeo esquema que se en-cuentra en el dngulo inferior derechode la figura. Este punto es may impor-tante como veremos en Zas secuenciasa seguir.

    9-En la figura que tenemos al lrente,el ayudante toma el hilo que correspon-de al punto corneal para abrir el cam-po. El cirujano con el RBT, eztiende eliris hacia. las VI para practicar unatoma basal de este, con la pinza an-gular “colibri de Pierse”.

    55

  • ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLE

    10—Ya hemos tomado el iris con la 11—En esta lamina se aprecia cdmopinza colibri y procedemos al corte queda la iridectomia periférica, prefe-aplicando las tijeras de iris, paralela rentemente basal, y la disposicidn quea la incisién corneo-escleral. debe seguir manteniendo el hilo det

    punto central.

    12—El ayudante _levanta la cérnea to- 13—Aqui vemos cdmo el cirujano tomamando 8°10 91 71110 de WWTIZ Que co- el RBT y reclina el iris hacia la escleraT76-Wonde a este. con el castremo de sus dos pies esféricos,

    bien yuntos 0 separados, segrln conven-ga. De esta forma presentamos un cam-po libre para la aplicacidn del crio-e:r-tractor, sin peligro de que este tomeParte del iris 0 del endotelio corneal.

    56

  • SECUENCIAS DE LA INTERVENCION QUIRURGICA

    14—El RBT, como ustedes ven en su 15-/tplicamos el crio-extractor sobreotro ertremo, tiene un Zabio tipo sepa- la cdpsula cristaliniana entre el Ecua-rador, que a gusto del cirujano puede dor y el polo superior, y hecha la tomaservir para reclinar el iris, en lugar de se hacen movimientos de vaivén comolos pies esjéricos. indican laa flechas.

    \ 2

    ‘I3’.

    1(i~Cuando apenas se ha conseguido la 17—En esta lrimina se ve cdmo la por-semilzzxacién del cristalino, se retira el cién corneal no estd levantada y elRTB y con sus dos pies esféricos, se cristalino deia por complete su lecho.ejerce una presién sobre el limbo escle-ro-corneal hacia las VI. De esa formael cristalino termina. por lurarse y sedesliza hacia el exterior.

    5'7

  • ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLE

    \

    ,//

    x

    18—Se procede a anudar el punto cen- 19—Puntos de sutura complementariostral de la incision que nos habia acom- bien radiales.paado en toda la operacion hasta estemomenta. Inmediatamente con una ca-nula de camara anterior N‘? 25, aplica-mos una solucion de acetilcolina. Suaccién miética se hace presente y lacamara anterior queda rellenada. Estamaniobra nos facilitard la aplicacionde los demas puntos. ..-—

    \

    20—En esta lamina ustedes, notaran, sz' 21—Terminadas Zas suturas practica-no_ son tomados los puntos de sutura mos el recubrimiento conjuntival encozncldentes tanto en la parte escleral /orma de casquete con dos puntos encomo corneal. Veremos aparecer an re- los ertremos.pliegue corneal de lo mas desagradable.En cambio cuando son coincidentes, lasutura sera perjecta.

    58

  • SECUENCIAS DE LA INTERVENCION QUIRURGICA

    22—Procedemos a practicar un peZZiz- 23—EZ ojo operado queda ocluido concamiento con la pinza en una porcién ambos pdrpados manteniéndose estade la conjuntiva del fondo del saco in- oclusién con el hilo que al principioferior y aplicamos con una agujia N‘? 23, habiamos aplicado en el centre del bor-de bisel corto, una solucidn corticoidea de del pdrpado superior. Este hilo sede depdsito. Esta maniobra es de sum‘: fijard sobre el borde orbital inferior enimportancia y estamos seguros que mu- su parte media, con una cinta. adhesiva.chas complicaciones postoperatorias sehan evitado con ella, como la queratitisbullosa, congestidn escleral y ciliar, etc.

    24—Retractor de iris, visto de /rente. 25—Retract0r de iris, visto de perfil.

    59

  • ROQUE BELLIDO TAGLET

    SUMMARY

    The author presents several sub-realistic slides made by him, showingthe surgical steps he prefers:

    A superior rectus stitch is placed. The pupil is under 9 mm. mydriasis.A conjuctival flap is performed; the conjunctiva is pushed towards theupper part of the fornix, out of the operating field itself. A corneo-scleralflap is practiced using a knife, moving the knife from left to right, in theleft as well as in the right eye, obtaining thus a bevelled adjustment. Theflap is finished using Barraquer cornea scissors. A corneo-scleral previousstitch which joins both bevelled edges is placed. Using this stich, havingpreviously made a loop, the assitant lifts the cornea and the surgeonperforms a peripheric iridectomy. The iris is grasped using a Pierse colibriforceps. Next, the author pulls the iris towards the sclera using a separatorof his design. Using the previous stitch, the assistant lifts the cornea andthe surgeon performs the cryoextraction of the cataractous lens withswaying movements. Once the lens is sub-luxated, the iris retractor isremoved, pressing the limbus at 6 with retractor. Next, the previous stitchis tightened and acetilcholine is instilled into the anterior chamber toreform it. Once the sutures are placed, a cap-like conjunctival sheathingis fixed with two stitches placed at the ends of the conjunctival flap.

    At the end of the operation, a long-action corticoid solution is injected.

    J. M.

  • m tn

    TERCIUM FORUMOPHTHALMOLOGICUM

    LUNES 17VIERNES 21MARZO - 1980 I

    APARTADO AEREO 091019BOGOTA — COLOMBIA

  • NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORSPapers submitted for publication, book for review and other editorial

    :ommunications, including applications for exchanges should be sent tothe “Redaccion Archivos de la Sociedad Americana de Oftalmologia yDptometria”, Apartado Aéreo 091019, Bogota, 8, Colombia.All papers should be accompanied by a statement that they have not

    already been published elsewhere and that, if accepted, the will not sub-sequently be offered to another publisher without the consent of the Edi-torial Committee. They should be typewritten in double spacing on oneside of the paper only, with 2-inch margin. The author’s name should beplainly indicated following title of paper and the address should appearat the end of the article.The author’s name should be accompanied by highest earned acade-

    mic or medical degree which he holds.Ilustration should be separate from the typescrip and numbered in

    sequence with the appropriate leends, on a separate sheet. Each should bemarket on the bach with the author’s name, and the upper edge shouldbe marked “Top” for the printer’s guidance. Graphs and charat should bechearly drawn in Indian ink on tracing linen. Bristol board, or stout,smooth, white paper. All lettering should be lightly written in pencil.Photomicrographs should bear a note as to the degree of magnification.When X-ray reproduction in required, the author in advised to send theoriginal film.If it is necessary to publish a recognizable photograph of a person, the

    author should notify the publisher that permission to publish has beenobtained from the subject himself in an adult, or from the parents orguardian if a child.References should be listed alphabetically, arranged in the sytle of the

    Harvard system, and abbreviated according to the World List of Scienti-fic Publications (the volumen number in a-rabic numerals underlined witha wavy line to indicate bold type, the number of the first page in arabicnumerals):v. g. SCHEPENS, C. L., (1955)Amer. J. 0phthal., 38,8.When a book is referred to, the full title, publisher, place and year of

    publication, edition and page number should given:v. g. RYCROFT, B. W., (1955) “Corneal Grafts” p. 9. Butterworth.London.Contributors will receive galley-proofs on their articles, but it will be

    assumed that all but verbal corrections have been made in the originalmanuscript Fifty reprints of each article will be sent free to the contribu-tor (s). A limited number of aditional reprints as cost price can be suppliedapplications in made when returning profs.Applications and correspond concerning advertissements should be ad-

    dresed to: Casa Heller Ltda. Apartado Aéreo 4966. Bogota - ColombiaSuscription price per annum, including postage:

    Colombia — $ 150.00 (Colombian pesos).F°l‘BiEl1 -— $ 10-00 (U. S. Currency).