Utility Research and Consulting Partnering in Market Development for innovations in solutions, services and reform models Customer Intelligence Market Intelligence Investment Intelligence New Business Modeling POC/ Pilot Management M&E, Audit, Impact Assessment Communication & Outreach Stakeholder Engagement Mobile & Web Apps
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Utility Research and Consulting
Partnering in Market Development for innovations in solutions, services and reform models
help build local and global ‘Intelligence’ and ‘engaging’ stakeholders to shape ‘sustainable utility businesses’ and new solutions, services and reform models
INTELLIGENCE(DECISION SUPPORT)
ENGAGEMENT(POSITIONING & OUTREACH)
Market Intelligence- Market Sizing- Competitive Analysis- Stakeholder Analysis- Go-to-Market Strategy- Industry Outlook studies
Investment Intelligence- Market/ Business Due Diligence- Investment Feasibility- TEV study- Financial Modeling- IP Valuation
New Business Modeling, POC,Partnerships- New Business Modeling- Pilot Project Management- Scale-up Roadmap- Partnership Development- PPP Advisory
Customer Intelligence- CSAT, Feedback, VOC- Customer Service Quality- Willingness to Pay- Demand Assessment- Customer Data analytics- Custom Surveys
Monitoring and Evaluation- Performance Dashboards- Impact Assessment- Baseline and Benchmarking- Customer Service Level Benchmark- Audits
Communications & Outreach- Policy Advocacy- POV studies- Blogs & Webinars- Events- Whitepapers- Newsletters- Social Media Campaigns
is to all players in the utility value chain. Additionally we engage them all to shape mass utility transformation.
Audit and improve business processes and end-customer services delivery
Operator
Conduct Go-to-Market intelligence, design business case, establish value proposition, engage POC/ pilot, Brand Rationalisation
Service Provider
Benchmark and strengthen PPP model design, conduct stakeholders consultation, build baseline data, model financial risk & returns
Consultant
Conduct business due-diligence, and performance benchmarking on emerging to-invest business models
Investor
Support market development of new innovations & reform models, engage POC/ pilot, conduct demand/ supply research, survey customers for service level benchmarking
Institution
Conduct impact assessment of existing policies through engaging key stakeholders and end-customers, and guide new policy formulation
span utility value chain, sectors, geography, size, countries
OPERATORS
INSTITUTIONS
INVESTORS CONSULTANTS
SERVICE PROVIDERS
and more….
• Dr. Ashok JhunjhunwalaProf. IIT-Madras
• Dinesh JainFounder Agaami Inc, USA
• Anil ParakhPartner VKSCA
• Dr. M. VidyasagarProf. Univ. Texas Dallas
Our Team
Management Team
• Rahul Bagdia – Co-Founder. Leads the Utility Practice and broader Business Development at pManifold. Earlier, he led the PE fund in Rural Energy for IFMR Trust, Chennai (supported by ICICI) and also the R&D for a German automotive component supplier BHTC Inc. in North America. He holds dual Masters (Mech. & EECS) from Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and a BE (Mechanical) from VNIT Nagpur.
• Faiz Wahid – Co-Founder. Leads Client Delivery & Engagement, and also IP Team at pManifold. Earlier, he worked in Product Marketing for NXP Semiconductors (formerly Philips) Netherlands and also led global Banking-Technology consulting assignments for Cognizant in Switzerland & India. He holds an MBA from HEC Paris/Univ. of Virginia USA, MS (Software Engg) from BITS Pilani and BE (Electrical) from VNIT Nagpur.
Advisory
is globally connected, locally immersed, functionally diverse, Knowledge driven …
IUKAN is all-utility all-stakeholders engagement Conference
Conference HighlightsTopic Coverage1. Reinforcing Local Ecosystem for Reforms2. Benchmarking Operational success of PPPs3. Improving Performance Contracting of PPPs4. Innovating Outsourcing with Service Providers5. Marketing Mass Behaviour change in Customers6. Financing Loss Reduction& attracting Capital
Program Agenda- PowerProgram Agenda- Water
6 power packed sessions each in 2 Parallel Tracks48 thought leading speakers250+ participants from Companies150+ companies62 BEST Practices published from 36 companies11 Companies Awarded for their best practiceshttp://www.iukan.in/conference-2014
Mapping Service Quality Indicators across all customer categories on GIS maps
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Power, Quality & Reliability
Customer Service
Communication
Meter, Billing & Payment
Price
Information Access & Rec
Handling
Company Image
Weighted CSI (Perception)
Weighted Order (Expectations)
Gap between Expectations & Perception of utility’s
PerformanceSatisfaction Level across different divisions
Key Observations
n= 1027
n= 340
n= 345 n= 342
Order of Importance
Inferences drawn from GIS map may not be statistically relevant.
HIGH LOW
Relative Order of Importance
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3Overall
n= 1027
FACTOR I: POWER QUALITY & RELIABILITY
5/5/2012C
op
yright (c) p
Man
ifold
A1: Unplanned outages - How satisfied are you with frequency and duration of unplanned outages?
Around 30% respondents from all 3 zones are dissatisfied with ‘Unplanned Outages’
As per customers comments, there is high problem of ‘Unplanned Outages’ in areas of Zone 3
Number of client registered Log Complaints is higher in Zone 3, matching above CSAT results
7%
40%53%
L M H
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
VS S DS VDS NA
Zone 3Zone 2Zone 1Overall
• 1000+ customers primary survey across 40 sampled wards of one urban Maharashtra town (completed as on Sep. 2012)
• Validate the top line revenue projections from 24x7 Water project, and facilitated financial closure of Rs. 1000+ cr. for the project
• Door-to-door survey of all socio-economic category of customers, across sampled Electoral wards using Contingent Valuation Methodology (CVM).
• Benchmarking respondent profile, Water sources characterization, Opinion on existing MC water services, Willingness to receive & pay for improved services, Billing preferences
Tariff Rationalisation & Willingness to Pay (WTP) – Water 24x7
Measure Customer Expectations & Perceived Service Quality Experience and clientele
Most independently and skipping all hierarchies, we allow you active listening and acting upon to your ‘Customer voices’ across all touch points and utility processes
Better Customer Engagement + Expedited Loss Reduction
Customer Analytics
Locally immersed
Adv. Mobile UIs
Real time tracking
GIS integration
High security
Vetted Methodologies
Established processes
Robust quality control
Adv. statistics/analytics
Micro strategy BI
Strict confidentiality
Reliable Front End
Robust Back End
Market Research – Power Distribution Franchisee
Key Questions Answered..• What is potential of Distribution Franchisee (DF)
model?• Which states are looking to adopt the model?• What are key risks and challenges?• How is the bid process and how to analyze critical
contract terms and conditions in the RFP?• What is a typical Capex Distribution for new DFs?• What Returns to expect from a DF model, and what
key sensitivity parameters to analyze?• How has been the bidding scenario and trend in
previous DF bids?
Report Beneficiaries• Some select companies includes SBI
Caps, General Atlantic, L&T, ABB, Moser Baer, Essel, Spanco, PNC InfraTech, ACME, SIS, SMS, IRIDIS, SPML, MEIL
• Offered complementary workshop to their Top Management to understand report content, and help them with their entry and investment decision in DF business
RFP baseline should share detailed customer segmentation -
meter types, numbers, consumption, arrears (Live & PD),
subsidy, payment, complaints etc.Performance Guarantee (Inclusion of
Electricity Duty)
DISCOM's risk is better covered, by adding few months ED
towards performance guarantee.Minimum Benchmark curve for Price
Bid (No benchmark is favored by
bidders)
Setting no min. benchmark curve will allow bidders to be
innovative in their price bid structuring. DISCOM should
instead share their calculations for viability.Arrear Recovery Sharing (Higher
share is better)
Higher arrear recovery sharing work as good incentives for
bidders. Ageing data will allow better analysis if to extend
incentive time period to 2-3 yrs. There is risk of public
agitation, if arrear recovery is focused first.Deputed Employees Terminal
Liability Payment by DF (sharing with
DF is fair)
Sharing part responsibility of deputed employee's terminal
liabilities (gratuity/pension) with DF, till service used, is
supportive to DISCOM business case for DF (lower HR and
O&M costs).Mandated AT&C Loss Reduction
Trajectory (No trajectory is preferred
by DF)
A bulk target of reducing AT&C losses to say 13% in 10 yrs.
has higher chances of success over year wise targets and
associated penalities. Ground conditions and engaging locals
could take good time. Penalties for Non Achievement of
Loss Reduction Targets (Lower is
better with bidder)
Keeping low penalties and extreme targets could not
guarantee compliance. Increased co-creation and sharing
between bidders will yield better contract.Treatment of Subsidy (Bid Price to
include subsidy retention by DL. Likely
more preferred by DF)
There is risk for subsidy collection from Govt. and DISCOMs
are suffering it already. This risk is better handled with
bidder costing it in the bid price itself. (Ideally, subsidy could
go away with strong delivery.)Payment of Electricity Duty by DF
(Payment Frequency)
Allowing ED to be paid in say 6 months, could give DF a good
working capital, over paying it every month. This could be
good incentive to DF from DISCOM.Quality of supply and standard of
performance, Customer Satisfaction
(KPIs & Targets defined in RFP)
Some core objectives of DF are PQR, customer satisfaction,
and most RFPs do not have any metrics to measure and
hence set targets & ask focused capex. MP policy makers
have made a good start.Terminal Option to DF (longer
visibility preferred by DF)
Option like DF extension, conversion to full privatization
model, all Buy-out, Exit etc. needs to be given detailed
thoughts, in light of changing electricity market.
Comparative Review of RFPs, Bidder Preferences & Outlook
Client Problem
Solution Approach
Results
Quarterly Assessment of Customer Satisfaction with Business Processes
• Client wanted to monitor each process which interfaces with the end customer to monitor the challenges being faced by them and to obtain their feedback and opinions on various aspects of its service delivery
for a Power Distribution Franchisee company with 4+ lac consumers
• 800 systematically sampled customers were interviewed for the process that they had used in the last quarter.
• The results were presented as Management Dashboards with drill down capability in MS Excel.
• Key improvement Areas for each process was identified and presented to individual process owners and top management for action.• pManifold understood the business processes involved and
developed assessment questionnaires covering the key performance metrics of the process on which the customer feedback is collected. These primarily include Customer Satisfaction, Ease of process, Turn-around-Time, Staff behavior and Non-compliances e.g. additional payments, etc
• Computer Assisted Telephonic Interviewing (CATI) was used to reduce costs and ensure direct traceability to end customers.
• 8 customer facing process were covered,
– New Service Connection
– Meter Management
– Customer Service
– Meter Reading
– Bill Distribution
– Complaint Handling
– Collections
– Operations and Maintenance
Client Problem
Solution Approach
Results
Photo Meter Reading Mobile based App and Web integration with Billing CRM
• Client wanted to outsource its Meter Reading process and upgrade it to a Photo Meter Reading cycle. They want to deploy and expand currently used pilot mobile app, to a scalable and secured application and integrate with Billing CRM
for a Water 24x7 company with 2.5+ lac consumers base
• pManifold has developed Mobile based Meter Reading application + Web Application + Hosting + year round Managed services model to service end-end requirements
• The Mobile and Web App is developed and currently getting field tested for Phase-1 of deployment with 80K+ customers.
• Key features of Mobile + Web App– Role-based access to Utility Operations and Billing Team to enable:
• SPMs access zone-wise data
• Management to have overall view of data
• Early identification of exceptions
– Import/Export Data for cross validations and final CIS upload by Billing Team
– Audit Checks and Workflows to enable SPMs check meter readings and “Recommend Field Re-visits”
– Meter Reader-wise Workload management for load balancing