Pauline Evangelism Session 16: Church Leadership and Mission

Contemporary Evangelism and Expressions of Church:

Leadership and Mission

Contemporary Evangelism and Expressions of Church:

Leadership and Mission

The Light ProjectSession 16

[email protected]

The Light ProjectSession 16

[email protected]

Learning Outcomes

1. To explore the concept of ‘the church as an organic unity’ based largely upon Frank Viola’s Reimagining Church.

2. To compare and contrast the ‘institutional church’ with the ‘organic church.’

3. To understand the impact of healthy and functional church leadership upon church structure and mission.

“…something deep within me longed for an experience of church that mapped to what I read about in my New Testament. And I couldn’t seem to find it in any traditional church I attended.

In fact, the more I read the Bible, the more I became convinced that the contemporary church had departed far from its traditional roots.”

Viola, Reimagining Church, 11.

“A revolution in both the theology and practice of the church is upon us. Countless Christians, including theologians, ministers, and scholars, are seeking new ways to renew and reform the church. Others have given up on the traditional concept of the church altogether.

They have come to the conviction that the institutional church as we know it today is not only ineffective, but it’s also without biblical merit. For this reason, they feel that it would be a mistake to reform or renew the present church structure. Because the structure is the root problem.”

Viola, Reimagining Church,15.

Why might the structure of the present church be the ‘root problem’?

These names are associated with churches in the West:

• ‘the institutional church’• ‘the traditional church’• ‘basilica churches’• ‘auditorium churches’• ‘spectator churches’• ‘audience churches’• ‘programme-based churches’

The term ‘institutional church’ does not refer to God’s people.

It refers instead to a system or a way of ‘doing church.’

How can we characterize ‘institutional churches’?• Exist above, beyond and independent of their

members• Constructed upon programmes and rituals rather

than upon relationships• Often keep members from exercising their gifts• Priorities determine structure (hierarchical and non-

relational)• Highly structured, building-centred organizations• Regulated by set-apart professionals (‘clergy’)

aided by volunteers (‘laity’)• Congregants watch a religious performance once

or twice a week and retreat home to live out their individual Christian lives during the week

Leadership: Traditional Churches

CL

ER

GY

LA

ITY

POSITIONAL MINDSET:

HierarchicalLeadership

Traditional Church: Leadership on a Pedestal

The major problem with institutional and hierarchical churches is that they keep members in a state of ‘spiritual infancy.’

How did this situation come to be?

• The Body of Christ has lapsed into an audience due to its reliance on single leaders

• Christians come weekly to watch ‘professionals’ perform

• ‘Professional pulpiteerism’ supported financially by lay-spectators

• Usurps the Christian’s right to minister spiritually during corporate gatherings

• Keeps Christians weak and insecure• Disempowers and pacifies the believing

priesthood

• The majority of the church becomes passive, lazy, self-seeking and arrested in their spiritual development

• Hierarchical leadership suppresses both authentic community and natural, organic ministry (although not necessarily intentionally)

• Congregations become passive and dependent

• Warps many who occupy clerical positions since they struggle to shoulder the burdens of ministry alone—and were never intended to in the first place.

Bottom Line: Christians have come to prefer the convenience of paying someone else to shoulder the burden of oversight,

ministry and shepherding.

PR

IES

TH

OO

OD

O

F B

EL

IEV

ER

S

GIF

TS

O

F

SP

IRIT

Leadership: ‘New Testament Churches’

FUNCTIONAL MINDSET:

Organic andmutual ministry

How can the ‘organic church’ be characterized?

• Churches that operate according to the same spiritual principles as NT churches

• ‘People out for a walk’ rather than ‘people riding on a train’ (traditional churches)

• Seek to give life rather than laying on yet more rules and regulations

• Helps believers to grow in Christ rather than filling people with shame, fear, guilt and a sense of spiritual inadequacy

• Authentic (biblical) community• Easy for people to function and contribute• Non-hierarchical and relational• Spirit free to move and change church’s

direction• Organic and spontaneous outreach to

unbelievers• Church becomes ‘all of life’ 24/7 rather

than Sundays alone• No artificial division between the ‘sacred’

and the ‘secular’

Key Words to Describe the Church:

•Organic

•Natural growth

•Bearing fruit

•Healthy

•Growing

•Good for you!

•Compelling

Should the church grow organically out of its association with the Scriptures?

Given what we have learned so far about how Paul and the early Christians conceived of the church, church leadership and evangelism…

• How do current models of church and evangelism fit those concepts?

• Why do you think so little has come of programme-driven ‘church growth’ and evangelism strategies?

• What, if anything, needs to change currently so that our churches and our evangelism are more organic, natural and spontaneous?

What do you think Paul would say today if he saw the state of the institutional churches in the West?

Do you think that his response would fit the images we saw in his writings of the church as a body or a living organism where each body part does its part to help the entire organism experience natural and organic growth?

For resources related to preaching that addresses the challenges of emerging

church and postmodernism see:

www.preachersforum.org

For blog posts on spirituality, life and religion see:

www.propheticrhetoric.blogspot.com