Top Banner
PENGENDALIAN MUTU HASIL PERTANIAN
45

minggu ke 3.ppt

Apr 18, 2017

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: minggu ke 3.ppt

PENGENDALIAN MUTUHASIL PERTANIAN

Page 2: minggu ke 3.ppt

QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS

SENSORY Sight – Appearance

o Coloro Glosso Viscosityo Size and shapeo Defect

Touch-Kinesthetic (texture)o Hand or finger feelo Mouth feel

Smell and Taste – Flavouro Odouro Taste

HIDDEN Nutritive value Harmless adulterants Toxicity

Page 3: minggu ke 3.ppt

QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS

• VARIABLES

Characteristics that are measurable and are expressed on numerical scale

Ex.:diameter, weight

• ATTRIBUTES

Characteristics which can be classified as conforming or nonconforming to stipulated specifications requirement

• acceptable or not acceptable• go or not go to the next step

May be numerous or notEx.: colour and flavor of candy

diameter of potato passing through a go/not go gage

Page 4: minggu ke 3.ppt

QUALITY CONTROL CYCLE

Customer specificationsfor each

Quality factor

Action Testing when needed methods

Reporting ControlControl Chart Stations

Page 5: minggu ke 3.ppt

MEASUREMENTS

• DIRECT

• CORRELATED

* OBJECTIVE

DESTRUCTIVE

SUBJECTIVE

NON DESTRUCTIVE

Page 6: minggu ke 3.ppt

OBJECTIVE vs SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS

SUBJECTIVEProduct is being evaluated with the aid of human sense

Environmental healthCondition

personal bias

Lack of absolute pointTend to compare rather than absolute evaluation

OBJECTIVEInstrumental physical or chemical measurement

Page 7: minggu ke 3.ppt

Precise Accurate

Method of Measurements

Rapid Simple

Inexpensive

OBJECTIVE METHODS SHOULD BE USED WHEN AVAILABLE

Page 8: minggu ke 3.ppt

SIZE AND SHAPE

SIZE• Length, width, diameter• Volume : space occupied Apparent displacement

Absolute displacement• Weight• Weight-Volume Ratio Relative density

Absolute densitySHAPE• Symmetry• Curvature• Regular vs irregular• Cutting : Cube, Slice (flat, zig-zag, wave) etc

Page 9: minggu ke 3.ppt

COLOUR MEASUREMENT

• DescriptionFree descriptionStandardized description

• Comparison – colour chart

• SpectrophotometryAbsorbance / TransmitanceReflectance

Page 10: minggu ke 3.ppt

DEFECT• is associated with quality characteristic that does not meet a certain

standard• Imperfections due to the absence of something for perfection or the

presence of something that distract from perfectionNatural product:Genetic physiologicalEntomologicalPathologicalExtraneous foreign material

• Instrumentation:» Improve visibility» Standardize condition of examination» Reference standard» Count and measure» Isolation of defect : flotation, electronic sorting, etc.

Page 11: minggu ke 3.ppt

TEXTURE

RHEOLOGY(physical)

• Young’s modulus• Shear modulus• Poisson’s ratio• Viscosity• etc

HEPTAESTHESIS(perceived)

• Mouthfeel– Hardness– Chewiness– Gumminess– Adhesiveness– etc

Page 12: minggu ke 3.ppt

PENGUKURAN SIFAT TEKSTURAL SECARA OBYEKTIF

FUNDAMENTAL TESTPengukuran sifat sifat rheologi

Young’ modulus : rasio stress thd strain bila bahan elastis ditekan atau diregang E = stress / strain

Shear modulus : rasio shearing stress thd shearing strain

G = sheaing stress / shearing strain

Page 13: minggu ke 3.ppt

Bulk modulus : rasio stress thd perubahan volume

K = tek. Hidrostatik / strain volumetric

Poisson’s ratio : rasio strain lateral thd strain axial

U = perub. ketebalan per tebal / perub.pjg per unit pjg

PersyaratanStrain rendah (1- 3%)Bahan bersifat kontinyu, isotropik, homogenSampel uniform dan regular

SULIT DIPENUHI DALAM BAHAN MAKANAN

Page 14: minggu ke 3.ppt

EMPIRICAL TESTDikembangkan untuk pengukuran melalui percobaan dan pengamatan, sederhana, cepat dan sesuai untuk pengendalian mutuContoh : Adam/ USDA consistometer

IMITATIVE TESTDikembangkan berdasar meniru penggunaan bahan makanan dalam praktekContoh: GF texturometer

Lloyd Texture AnalyzerUniversal Testing Mechines

Page 15: minggu ke 3.ppt

Basic principles of texture measurements • Distance measuring

Penetrometer: needle, cone, ball Deformation : Ridgelimeter, Adam consistometer Bostwick consistometer

Page 16: minggu ke 3.ppt
Page 17: minggu ke 3.ppt
Page 18: minggu ke 3.ppt
Page 19: minggu ke 3.ppt
Page 20: minggu ke 3.ppt

Viscosity newtonian vs non-newtonian

Basic principles of viscosity measurements Resistance to flow:• Capilarry tube : Ostwald viscosimeter• Orifice : Saybolt viscosimeter• Falling weight : gardner Mobilometer• Rotation of cylinder : Brookfield, stormer• Power consumption : Brabender Farinograph• Flow of material : Adam consistometer

Page 21: minggu ke 3.ppt

Basic principles of texture measurements • Force measuring

Puncture/compression: Magness Taylor tester Shear pressure : UTM, GFT

Page 22: minggu ke 3.ppt
Page 23: minggu ke 3.ppt
Page 24: minggu ke 3.ppt

• Adhesiveness = A3

• Elasticity = springiness

• Cohesiveness = A2 / A1

• Gumminess = hardness x cohesiveness

• Chewiness = gumminess x springiness

Page 25: minggu ke 3.ppt

Basic principles of texture measurements • Correlated method

Moisture content Color measurement Sound Consistency

Page 26: minggu ke 3.ppt

FLAVOR sensory

• Basic requirement of any sensory QC system is the definition of standard and tolerances limits on a sensory basis for the products

• Require a calibration study / research, e.g. identification of standard products and tolerances limits

• Maintaining a reference standard as a standard quality product

• Need to select and train the panels

Page 27: minggu ke 3.ppt

Pengujian sensoris untuk pengendalian mutu flavor• Metoda in / out• Metoda rating degree of differences from

standard• Metoda quality rating• Metoda Descriptive analysis• Kombinasi / Modifikasi

Page 28: minggu ke 3.ppt

The valuation may be carried out• In-line process• In laboratory

Page 29: minggu ke 3.ppt

METHODS FOR SENSORY QC• In/out or pass – fail procedure• Rating for overall degree of differences from

standard or control product• Quality rating• Descriptive analysis method• Quality scoring with attribute scale*

Page 30: minggu ke 3.ppt

In/out or pass – fail procedureThe simplest procedurePanels : small group company employ, trainedLarge amount of product/session

Page 31: minggu ke 3.ppt

Rating for overall degree of differences from standard or control product

Training with range of references and establishing the nature and condition for reproducing the control sample are critical

extremely samedifferent asfrom control control

Page 32: minggu ke 3.ppt

Degree of differences with verbal category scale No Difference Very slight difference Slight difference Moderate difference Moderate/large difference Large difference Very large difference

Page 33: minggu ke 3.ppt

Degree of differences with numerical category scale0 = No Difference123456789 = Very large difference

Page 34: minggu ke 3.ppt

Quality rating

• Scale directly represent the quality judgement rather than sensory differencesVerbal category scaleNumerical scaleLine scale

• Poor – to – excellence : motivate the panels involve in the decision making

Page 35: minggu ke 3.ppt

Descriptive analysis method Using an acceptable range

Panels have been familiarized with standardPanels evaluate the productCut off point are kept by the decision maker

Page 36: minggu ke 3.ppt

Advantages:• Detail and quantitative, well correlated with

instrumental result• Once panels have adopt the analytical in mind, need

less cognitive load• Reason for correction action easier, since specific

characteristics are ratedBUT• Depend on intensity anchoring• Lab. panels than other• Costly and slow to implement 9from management

point of view)

Page 37: minggu ke 3.ppt

Evaluation of Potato Chip using Descriptive Spec.Acceptable range Mean panel score

AppearanceColor intensity 5.5-6.0 4.7Color evenness 6.0-12.0 4.8Size evenness 4.0-8.5 4.1FlavorFried potato 3.0-5.0 3.6Cardboard 0.0-1.5 5.0Painty 0.0-1.0 0.0Salty 8.0-12.5 12.5TextureHardness 6.0-9.5 7.5Crispiness 10.0-15.0 13.1Denseness 7.5-10.0 7.4

Page 38: minggu ke 3.ppt

Quality scoring with attribute scale

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Reject Acceptable Unacceptable Match

Simple /easy to be done by in line or in lab

Page 39: minggu ke 3.ppt

SENSORY CHECK LIST

• Test objective• Test type• TEST AREA

– Separation of panelists– Temperature– Humidity– Light conditions– Auditory (noise)– Clean-air handling/background odor– Accessability– Security

Page 40: minggu ke 3.ppt

PANELIST– Recruitment– Screening– Training– Panelist control

SAMPLE– Size and shape– Volume– Carrier– Serving temperature– Maximum holding time

Page 41: minggu ke 3.ppt

TEST SET-UP– Panelist check in– Palate cleansers– Instructions– To technicians– To panelists– Score sheets– Instructions– Type of scale– Attribute words– Anchor words

Page 42: minggu ke 3.ppt

– Coding– Randomization/counterbalancing– Booth items– Pencils– Napkins– Spit cups– Clean-up– Disposal arrangements (important if security risk)– Receipts (if incentive is monetary)– Panelists debriefing

Page 43: minggu ke 3.ppt

TEST CONTROL• Location• Test room design• The booth• Descriptive evaluation and training area• Preparation area• Office facilities• Entrance and exit area• Storage• Color and lighting• Air circulation, temperature and humidity• Construction materials

Page 44: minggu ke 3.ppt

PRODUCT CONTROL• General equipments• Product sampling• Source of product• Testing need• Storage• Sample preparation• Supplies preparation• Materials• Preparation procedures• Sample presentation• Container, sample size, and other particular• Order, coding, number of samples

Page 45: minggu ke 3.ppt

PANELIST CONTROL• Panelist or orientation• They should thoroughly familiar with:• Test procedure• Score sheet design• Type of evaluation required• Product/time of day• Panelist/environment