1 Mental Health in Palestine William R. Woodward, University of New Hampshire Presented the European Society for the History of the Human Sciences, July 22-25, 2014, in Oulu, Finland Obligation of an Occupier shirked Since 1967, Palestine is a land under occupation by a foreign power. Israel has not fulfilled the obligations of an occupying power in that Israel’s own Mental Health Act has not been applied to Palestine. A legislative framework for mental health has been lacking, with consequences for unemployment, refugee status, and traumatic effects of occupation and war (Murad & Gordon, 2002). After the Second Intifada or revolutionary uprising in 1990, Israel began construction of the wall that impeded thousands from getting to work or to medical services in Israel or the occupied territories. In 1994, at a meeting of the Pan Arab Federation of Psychiatrists, members began to draft a proposed Mental Health Act as a framework to be used in each Arab country (Chaleby, Pakhawi, Azim, 1996). By the early 2000’s, the separation wall precipitated a humanitarian crisis such that the International Committee of the Red Cross withdrew its short-term emergency aid program, arguing that to continue would be relieve the Occupier of its financial responsibility under international law. ICRC shifted focus to documenting damage to civilian infrastructure and policies restricting freedom of movement (Schorno, 2004). The U.N. Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs took over, though they too do not provide relief (Shearer, 2004). It remained to voluntary agencies to support the population, working with the Palestinian Ministry
15
Embed
Mental health and mental health services in Palestine (2014)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Mental Health in Palestine
William R. Woodward, University of New Hampshire
Presented the European Society for the History of the Human Sciences, July 22-25, 2014, in
Oulu, Finland
Obligation of an Occupier shirked
Since 1967, Palestine is a land under occupation by a foreign power. Israel has not
fulfilled the obligations of an occupying power in that Israel’s own Mental Health Act has not
been applied to Palestine. A legislative framework for mental health has been lacking, with
consequences for unemployment, refugee status, and traumatic effects of occupation and war
(Murad & Gordon, 2002). After the Second Intifada or revolutionary uprising in 1990, Israel
began construction of the wall that impeded thousands from getting to work or to medical
services in Israel or the occupied territories. In 1994, at a meeting of the Pan Arab Federation of
Psychiatrists, members began to draft a proposed Mental Health Act as a framework to be used
in each Arab country (Chaleby, Pakhawi, Azim, 1996).
By the early 2000’s, the separation wall precipitated a humanitarian crisis such that the
International Committee of the Red Cross withdrew its short-term emergency aid program,
arguing that to continue would be relieve the Occupier of its financial responsibility under
international law. ICRC shifted focus to documenting damage to civilian infrastructure and
policies restricting freedom of movement (Schorno, 2004). The U.N. Office of the Coordination
of Humanitarian Affairs took over, though they too do not provide relief (Shearer, 2004). It
remained to voluntary agencies to support the population, working with the Palestinian Ministry
2
of Health and the United Nations (Le More, 2004). Astoundingly, Palestine is the envy of some
Arab neighbors for its integration of local, regional, and international funding and services.
Thus, in 2002, the World Health Organization began a Palestine Mental Health Project, in
cooperation with the Palestinian Ministry of Health. In addition, they had partners with mental
health professionals from the West Bank and Gaza, and from French, Italian, and U.K. sources.
The project had a five year implementation plan, involving hospitals in Bethlehem and Gaza, and
the founding of community mental health services (in Bethlehem, Ramallah, and Hebron). The
Project had a public face through anti-stigma initiatives, service user groups, and family
associations. Trauma-focussed care was integrated into these systems, thus avoiding the common
problem in conflict or post-conflict situations of organizing care by catchment areas rather than
by disease categories (WHO, 2006). In 2008, the European Union pledged another $3.5 million
Euro to the Project (IRIN, 2008). The goal was to get family groups to support the relatives of
people suffering emotional problems and mental illness.
Mental Health Facilities and Research Initiatives
The mental health facilities themselves are of course paltry (Afana et al, 2004).
Apparently, Bethlehem has the only psychiatric hospital on the West Bank; before 1967, it
covered both West and East Banks of the Jordan. Bethlehem Hospital has 320 beds, of which a
third are occupied by epileptics. It spawned community psychiatric clinics in Ramallah, Nablus,
and Jenin (Gordon et al, 1996).
The Gaza Hospital, established in 1979 and restored in 1994, has a mere psychiatric 40
beds. General hospitals in Gaza City include Al-Ahli Arab Hospital, Al-Shifa Hospital with 600
3
beds, and Al-Wafa Rehabilitation Hospital. The solution in Gaza is community mental health
centers.
The Gaza Community Mental Health Project (GCMHP) provides community mental
health services, trains in community mental health and human rights, and sponsors field research
(Thabet & Vostanis, 1998, 1999). The Shamas Center deals with rehabilitation of brain-
damaged and severely handicapped children. Doctors without Borders provides for rehabilitation
of former political prisoners. Hebron offers support for mentally-handicapped. Gaza has the Al-
Wafa Hospital, which was bombed last week and now needs $3 million in repairs (Goodman &
Alashi, 2014, July 18). The Union of International Churches is involved (Alana et al, 2004). Al-
Wafa Hospital in Gaza City does rehabilitation.
In a land with roughly 40% of the population depressed, Palestine sadly offers a rich site
for depression research. NIH funded it recently in the modest amount of $300,000. One research
topic is what factors have allowed the other 60% to avoid depression (Upbin, 2013). A wider aim
is to counter Palestine’s brain drain and to offer opportunities for research. The Palestine
Neuroscience Initiative opened in 2009 in Al-Quds and has 22 students, 14 medical specialists,
and 4 therapists. It has partnerships with Rutgers, Harvard, Lausanne, and Trieste.
Keeping the Focus: Interdisciplinary, International, Human Rights
Recently, a multilevel approach to mental health care was called for (Jabr et al, 2013). (1)
Care requires interdisciplinary teams, in which the psychiatrist works with social workers and
psychologists. The patient and his or her family should be thought of as team members. (2)
Primary care physicians must be trained to screen and treat mental health problems. This training
dramatically increases referrals. Diagnosis and treatment should include general medical
4
disorders “at the point of delivery.” (3) International partnerships in human sector resources and
research are ongoing, e.g., Cognitive Behavior Therapy with British and Palestinian clinicians
(Palestinian Neuroscience Initiative, website). Finally, (4) public health and human rights must
go together by preventing human rights abuses, especially against women and children, through
legislation and efforts to reduce risk factors like family violence, community violence, and
military violence.
Outrage at unjustified massacres of Palestinians is peaking again in summer 2014 as
Israel launches operation “Protective Edge.” Miko Peled, author of The General’s Son, remarked
recently that murder is nothing new; it has been ongoing for six decades since 1948. He pointed
out that we should not confuse Palestinian resistance to brutal oppression with Israeli apartheid.
Yet some mental health practitioners urge the Palestinian people not to focus on politics. The
Olympia-based ITTP claims “Intifada means uprising against injustice. It has a positive meaning
for us. We help them to understand that they ARE traumatized.” ITTP sends practitioners into
the schools to use the arts, creative writing, dance, to bring people together and overcome
isolation of trauma victims (ITTP, 2013).
The Gaza Community Mental Health Project
Psychologists for Social Responsibility, a division of the American Psychological
Association, supports the Gaza Community Mental Health Project (GSMHP). They treat “the
consequences of living in a war zone” (PsySR). They point out that restrictions from family
support, worries about family and community, contribute to depression and ongoing cycles of
violence. Children are coping with multiple losses, poverty, harsh restrictions. Their charitable
foundation is located in Boston. They receive funding from a consortium of Swedish,
Norwegian, and Danish sources. They receive support from Psychoanalysts for Social
5
Responsibility, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, Mental Health Professionals for Human
Rights, the Psychoactive Group, and the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology.
Let us look more closely at one study from the Gaza project. Dr. John van Eerwyk
founded the Gaza trauma treatment program with training missions in 1991 and 1993. He
expanded it into The International Trauma Treatment Program in Olympia, Washington in 1998
(ITTP, van Eerwyk, 2013), which has trained over 20 practitioners in a dozen countries, bringing
two per year to Olympia to collaborate in refining culturally-based ways to treat trauma. In 2003,
two Palestinians were invited for 3 month stays in Olympia, Israel denied their visas, Physicians
for Human Rights sued, and the visas were eventually granted. Two Israelis had planned to
come, but the delays interfered with work and they could not participate.
Two researchers examined social disadvantage related to anxiety disorders (Thabet &
Vostanis, 1998). They gave the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale to 237 children in
112 schools. To identify troubled children, they also administered the Rutter Teacher Scale to
teachers. The findings did not support the common view that children express mental health
symptoms through somaticizing symptoms. They found PTSD symptoms in 73% of the children,
age 6-11. Overcrowding and large family size were not associated with anxiety in rural families,
whereas socioeconomic conditions were associated with anxiety were in a study of 1000 poor
families in Newcastle, U.K. and in Palestinian refugee camps. Their findings show similar rates
of anxiety across all cultures including the U.S., about 21%, and the symptoms increase with age,
especially with girls. As abstract thinking grows, so does self evaluation, including worries and
nightmares.
The same two researchers visited two camps and compared the community treatments
(Thabet & Vostanis, 1999). They attended team meetings, did out-patient consultation, and
6
discussed case management. Behavioral symptoms included enuresis, nightmares, emotional and
oppositional disorders, learning disability and child protection issues. They compared the Khan
Younis camp in the South with the Jabalyia camp in the North of Gaza. They reported “high
clinical standards” under “extremely adverse circumstances (301).
Nuseirat Refugee Camp has one of eight community mental health centers in Gaza
(Shurman, 2012). Called “New Horizons,” this health center forms healing communities through
art, song, and dance therapy. It has an affiliation with the Bay Area Children’s Alliance in
Oakland, CA. Ayman Nijim, age 29, went to Baghdad to work with youth in 2003, just before
the U.S. invasion to study French and journalism but shifted to an interest in social work with
youth. He realized that his sense of “powerlessness” was common to many young people in
Palestine. He conducts daily workshops and sees symptoms of anxiety, hyperactivity, attention-
deficit disorder, and extreme introversion.
Issues in Identifying and Treating Mental Illness
A Norwegian study of general practitioners in the Gaza Strip showed that GPs recognize
serious mental illness in only about 12% of cases, while 88% of mental illness remained
undetected (Afana et al, 2002) whereas other countries have detection rates as high as 50%.
However, sex of patient and GP, age of patient and GP, and postgraduate training were also
factors, as well as country. For example, women GPs over 40 have higher detection rates.
Overall, a U.S. study showed only 20% recognition of psychiatric disorders, while a Norwegian
study showed 46%. However, attitude toward mental health problems may also be a cultural
difference. The social stigma of mental health problems is high in the Middle East and Africa, so
patients may be reluctant to reveal symptoms.
7
One authority on cross-cultural counseling with Arab-Palestinians is Marwan Dwairy
(1998, 2006), an Israeli clinician and academic. He describes a “collective personality” among
Arabs and Muslims, whereby diagnosis, assessment, and therapy need to reflect cultural values
on family. For example, a counselor who uses his or her authority to counsel clients, especially
female ones, to freedom and equality is in fact confronting a cultural value (2006, p. 108).
Typically a family figure (not the patient) decides whether to continue therapy. A misstep can
often cause a patient to leave. This may come from not being understood, or from feeling their
culture challenged.
Deconstructing Cultural Stereotypes in Psychiatry
We must be careful about embracing national or cultural stereotypes. Such was the article
by Harold Glidden in 1972, “The Arab World,” which appeared in the American Journal of
Psychiatry. Glidden identified “two key emotions,” shame brought about by their defeat, “which
can only be eliminated by revenge.” Arabs also allegedly fear domination by other Arab groups.
Edward Said (1979) lashed out at Glidden (1972) in his classic, Orientalism, noting that Glidden
only cited four references – a book on Tripoli, an Egyptian newspaper, an Italian periodical, and
a book by an Orientalist. Glidden characterized Arabs as skilled in subterfuge and low in valuing
peace, as well as being culture based on shame that attains prestige through dominating others.
Such stereotypes hardly belong in a leading psychiatric journal. Or does it reveal something
about racial bias in U.S. medicine? Negative stereotypes of the rich sheik, the camel, or the belly
dancer pervade the U.S. media (Iverson, 2005). Do they also infect the scholarly journals, where
“terrorism” is a focus of psychological research, while “apartheid,” and “resistance” and “state
terror” are conspicuously absent.
Excellent Trauma Study identifies Loss as Factor in PTSD
8
An example of a mental health treatment for trauma outside the mental health system is
the Treatment and Rehabilitation Center (TRC) for Victims of Torture in Ramallah, West Bank.
(http://cvt.hutman.net/). A psychiatrist who specialized in treating political prisoners since 1987
founded it under the auspices of the Mandela Institute for Political Prisoners in 1994. TRC offers
psychosocial therapy in homes, individual and group therapy, summer camp activity, public
meeting with need assessment questionnaires.
A model mental health study involved collaboration between the University of the Negev
in Israel, the University of Calgary, and the TRC at Ramallah, Palestine. The topic was “Mental
Health and Violence/Trauma in Palestine: Implications for Helping Professional Practice” (Al-
Krenawi et al, 2004). With an extensive review of the literature since the 1980s, the authors
followed four cases taken from the clinical records at the Ramallah Center since 2000. In Case 1,
Amjad is an 18-year-old who has supported his family of seven in a 2-room home in a refugee
camp by selling vegetables after his father was incapacitated by a bullet to the brain. In Case 3,
the Ashraf family was headed by Walid, a 39-year-old high school graduate and curtain designer.
They were self-sufficient until a bomb destroyed their home and left the mother with a back
injury. They could not afford to live in another house, so they returned to the damaged one. This
produced recurring fear that their house would be bombed again. The children feared going
outside. All four cases involve a loss. Even the paralysis of the father in Case 1 also
destabilized a home. The destruction of home is a destruction of history and a sense of
belonging. It is “the destruction of familial dreams” (193). As well, loss of home or continued
living in a damaged home is a retraumatization of the exile that Palestinians have experienced
since the catastrophe of the violent creation of Israel in 1948. This feeds into the