DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - Rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... · detailed project report name of watershed : lavera kalan (jodhpur xv) macro/micro watershed

Jodhpur XV

DETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORT NAME OF WATERSHED : LAVERA KALAN (JODHPUR XV) MACRO/MICRO WATERSHED No. : 15/8,9; 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 GRAM PANCHAYAT : LAVERA KALAN, NANDIA KALAN PROJECT AREA : 3108 Ha. PROJECT COST : 466.2 Lakh

-: SUBMITTED BY :-

ASSISTANT ENGINEER PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

PANCHAYAT SAMITI - BAORI (JODHPUR)

Jodhpur XV

INDEX

PARTICULARS PAGE No.

CHAPTER - 1 Introduction

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Philosophy of Integrated watershed management Pragramme

1.3 Objectives of IWMP

1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme

1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed

Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the watershed

1.6 Project Background

Table No. 2 Basic Project Information

Table No. 3 Watershed information

CHAPTER - 2 Project Implementing Agency

2.1 Project Implementing Agency

Table No. 4 Detail of PIA

Table No. 5 Staff at PIA level

2.1.1 Role and responsibility of WDT

Jodhpur XV

2.1.2 SWOT analysis of PIA

CHAPTER - 3 Basic Information of Watershed

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land use pattern

Table No. 6 Land use pattern

3.1.2 Soil and topography

Table No. 7 Soil type and topography

Table No. 8 Flood and drought condition

Table No. 9 Climatic conditions

Table No. 10 Physiography and relief

Table No. 11 Slope detail of watershed

Table No. 12 Erosion status in project area

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

Table No. 13 Land ownership details

Table No. 14 Land use & land classification

Table No. 15 Agriculture

Table No. 16 Crop details

Table No. 17 Crop production

3.1.4 Livestock

Table No. 18 Livestock

Table No. 19 Milk Production

Table No. 20 Drinking water

3.2 Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status

Jodhpur XV

Table No. 21 Demographic information

Table No. 22 Literacy rate

Table No. 23 Poverty

3.2.2 Migration Pattern

Table No. 24 Migration details

Table No. 25 Village infrastructure

Table No. 26 Facilities / HH assets

CHAPTER - 4 Watershed Activities

4.1 Scientific Planning

Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project

4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy

4.2.1 Social Strategy

4.2.2 Technical Strategy

4.3 Institution building

4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

Table No. 28 Watershed Committee Bavdi Kalan

Table No. 29 Bank account

4.3.2 Self Help Group

4.3.3 User Group

4.4 Physical activities to be undertake

4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

Table No. 30 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES

4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY

Jodhpur XV

4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE

4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION

4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS

4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS

4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT

4.4.2.7 FENCING

4.4.2.8 DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)

4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES

4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION

4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE

4.4.3.3 V DITCH

4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES

4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)

4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM

4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM

4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)

4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM

CHAPTER - 5 Proposed Development Plan

CHAPTER - 6 Activity wise Abstract of Cost

CHAPTER - 7 Technical Design & Estimates

CHAPTER - 8 Project Outcomes

CHAPTER - 9 Annexure

Jodhpur XV

CHAPTER - 1

IIIIIIIINNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRROOOOOOOODDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

Jodhpur XV

1.1 Introduction

In India, where a lot of water goes waste, it is important to apply the technology of watershed management

to solve its annual problems of droughts and floods. The demand for water exceeds its supply. Conflicts sharing

water resources are on the rise. Planning and development of watersheds calls for a rigorous understanding of the

occurrence and movement of water in the surface and sub-surface systems along with soil and nutrient losses in a

watershed as the need arises for a proper watershed management of that area. In a country like India, where a

lot of running water goes waste, it becomes very important to apply the technology of watershed management to

solve its annual problems of droughts and floods.

Watershed management basically involves harmonizing the use of soil and water resources between

upstream and downstream areas within a watershed toward the objectives of natural resource conservation,

increased agricultural productivity and a better standard of living for its inhabitants. Identifying and addressing the

significant externalities associated with watershed is critical for these objectives to be achieved in a sustainable

manner.

In the 1980s and 1990s, agricultural scientists and planners aimed to promote rain-fed agriculture through

watershed development. A watershed is an area from which all water drains to a common point, making it an

interesting unit for managing water and soil resources to enhance agricultural production through water

conservation

1.2 Philosophy of Integrated watershed management Pragramme

Jodhpur XV

IWM planning is a comprehensive multi-resource management planning process, involving all stakeholders

within the watershed, who together as a group, cooperatively work towards identifying the resource issues and

concerns of the watershed, as well as develop and implement a watershed plan with solutions that are

environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.

In India, the IWM efforts go back to 1970. There have been many changes in the implementation strategies

during the following years. Until 1995, watershed development projects were officially coordinated by multi-

sectoral programmes (with differing objectives) launched by the Government of India. After review in 1999 by the

Ministry of Rural Development and the Ministry of Agriculture, a common set of operational guidelines, objectives,

strategies and expenditure norms were established for watershed development programmes in 2001. These are

implemented through programmes such as DPAP (Drought-Prone Area Programme), DDP (Desert Development

Programme) and IWDP (Integrated Watershed Development Programme).

The guidelines encourage the active involvement of non-governmental organizations, semi-governmental

institutions and private enterprises, universities and training institutions. However, concerns are being raised that

emphasis in watershed development programmes is still firmly based on the belief that water is an infinite

resource, through development of groundwater abstraction and water harvesting techniques. IWM does not merely

imply the amalgamation of different activities to be undertaken within a hydrological unit. It also requires the

collation of relevant information so as to evaluate the cause and effect of all the proposed actions. The watershed

is the smallest unit where the evaluation of human-induced impacts upon natural resources becomes possible.

Therefore, although the ‘Panchayat’ remains the preferred implementation unit, the watershed should be the

evaluation unit used in assessing impacts

Jodhpur XV

1.3 Objectives of the IWMP

The main objectives of the IWMP are to restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and

developing degraded natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and water. The outcomes are prevention of

soil run-off, regeneration of natural vegetation, rain water harvesting and recharging of the ground water table.

This enables multi-cropping and the introduction of diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide sustainable

livelihoods to the people residing in the watershed area.

1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index,

Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture

Index, Area under rain-fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land,

Productivity potential of the land, Contiguity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster

approach for plain or for hilly terrain

1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed

State Remote Sensing Application Center, Jodhpur (SRSAC) has prepared "Watershed Atlas of Rajasthan ".

Watersheds have been delineated into macro / micro in each block. These have been prioritized on the basis of

two important parameters i) extent of availability of cultivable arable lands and ii) Drainage Density. Besides this

priority watershed with preponderance of resource poor, SC/ST population is given importance. Willingness of

community to participate, contribute in the programme and to take up responsibility of post project maintenance

of the created assets. Weightage given to these criteria for selection is as follows:

Jodhpur XV

Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S.

No.

Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of

poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %

(2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 %

(10)

20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 %

(3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower

than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or

higher than minimum wages

(0)

iv % of small and

marginal farmers

10 More than 80 %

(10)

50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 %

(3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below

(15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6

(10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed

agriculture

15 More than 90 %

(15)

80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %

(Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic

village (7.5)

Partially covered

(5)

Fully covered

(0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15)

Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production &

where productivity

can be

Lands with moderate

production &

where

Lands with high production &

where

productivity can

Jodhpur XV

significantly

enhanced with reasonable efforts

(15)

productivity can

be enhanced with reasonable

efforts (10)

be marginally

enhanced with reasonable efforts

(5)

xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has already been

developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to

previously treated watershed &

contiguity within the micro-watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within

the micro-watersheds in

the project but non contiguous to previously treated

watershed (5)

Neither

contiguous to previously treated

watershed nor contiguity within the micro-watersheds in the

project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one

contiguous micro-watersheds in the

project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in

cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro-watersheds in

cluster (10)


cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one

contiguous micro-watersheds in the

project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in

cluster (15)


cluster (10)


cluster (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Lavera Kalan watershed project as

given in table No. 1.1

Total number of families under BPL is 61 which are less than 50 per cent of the total households. The

percentage of SC/ST is about 34 per cent to the total population. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary

Jodhpur XV

occupation of the watershed due to the fact that ground water is very deep and there is no source of irrigation.

More than 50 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour

is more than the minimum wages.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under

DDP block. The Lavera Kalan watershed falls in the continuity with other watersheds namely Paton ki basin, Lavera

khurd, Kherapa and Melana. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration nine micro-watersheds

covering a total area of 3627 ha.

Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the watershed

Weightage under the criteria S.

No.

Distt Block Project

Name

No. of micro

W/s covered

Propos

ed

project

area

Type of

project

(Hilly /

Desert /

others)

Proposed

cost I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Total

1 Jodhpur Baori Jodhpur

XV

15/8,9;

16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7

3108 Desert 466.2 5 5 0 5 5 10 15 7.5 10 10 10 10 93

1.6 Project Background

Lavera Kalan project (Jodhpur-XV) is located in Baori Panchayat Samiti, Jodhpur District of Rajasthan State.

The project is a cluster of nine micro-watersheds

Jodhpur XV

S. No. Micro-watershed No. Code Area

1 16/1 00001601 225

2 16/2 00001602 1257

3 16/3 00001603 344

4 16/4 00001604 325

5 16/5 00001605 362

6 16/6 00001606 235

7 16/7 00001607 477

8 15/8 00001508 152

9 15/9 00001509 250

The total project area of the watershed is about 3627 ha of which 3108 ha. has been undertaken to be

treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Baori which is about 24 Km from Lavera Kalan and is well connected by pucca road. The

watershed includes area of two villages namely Lavera Kalan and Hardhani. Rajput, Jat, and SC communities are

the primary inhabitants of the watershed. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rain-fed agriculture,

animal husbandry, wage labour, cow, goat and sheep rearing. The project area falls under the Desert Prone area

according to DoLR Classification and situated at 26o 43’ N Latitude & 73o 15’ E Longitude.

Table no. 2: Basic Project Information

Jodhpur XV

Villages S.

No.

Name of

Project Name Census

Code

Area

(ha.)

Gram

Panchayats

District PIA Area

falling in

Project

(ha.)

Project

Cost

1 Lavera

Kalan

01945700 5559 Lavera Kalan Jodhpur A. En. 3108

2

Jodhpur

XV

Hardhani 01943200 2930 Nandia Kalan Jodhpur A. En. 402

466.20

lakh

Table no. 3: Watershed information

Name of the project Watershed to be treated Village Watershed type

16/1 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s







15/8 Lavera Kalan, Hardhani Micro W/s

Jodhpur XV

15/9 Hardhani Micro W/s

Jodhpur XV

CHAPTER – 2

PPPPPPPPRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT

IIIIIIIIMMMMMMMMPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNGGGGGGGG

AAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNCCCCCCCCYYYYYYYY

Jodhpur XV

2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is selected by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated

Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Rajasthan. The PIA for Lavera Kalan Watershed (Jodhpur XV) is

Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti Baori. The PIA is a block level nodal agency responsible for smooth

implementation of watershed project. The objectives of PIA are supervising, planning, implementing and

promoting watershed development project and related development activities as per guide lines. The PIA has

dedicated and experienced staff:

Table no. 4 : Detail of PIA

Sr.

No. Names of project Details of PIA

Designation

& Address

AEn watershed development & soil conservation

Baori (Jodhpur)

Telephone 02927265001

Fax

1 IWMP Lavera Kalan

(Jodhpur XV)

E-mail [email protected]

Jodhpur XV

Table no. : 5 Staff at PIA level

S.

No.

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification

1 Suresh Kumar Duggal 52 M Assistant Engineer B.E. (Ag)

2 Giriraj Kishor Nagla 40 M Junior Engineer B.E. (Ag) M.E. (SWC)

3 Jitendra Mathur 38 M WDT (Technical) Diploma in Civil Engg.

4 Shivdan Singh Rathore 40 M WDT (Agriculture) B.Sc. (Ag)

5 Nathuram Punia 30 M WDT (Veterinary) Diploma in Vet. Astt.

6 Kanta Chaudhary 27 F WDT (Social

Science)

B.A. (Sociology.), M.A.,

B.Ed.

2.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities of WDT

1 Assist Gram Panchayat / Gram Sabha in constitution of the Watershed Committee and their

functioning.

2 Organizing and nurturing User Groups and Self - Help Group.

3 Mobilizing women to ensure that the perspectives and interests of women are adequately reflected

in the watershed action plan.

4 Conducting the participatory base - line surveys, training and capacity building.

Jodhpur XV

5 Preparing detailed resource development plans including water and soil conservation or reclamation

etc. to promote sustainable livelihoods at household level.

6 Common property resource management and equitable sharing.

7 Preparing detailed Project Report (DPR) for the consideration of Gram sabha.

8 Undertake engineering surveys, prepare engineering drawings and cost estimates for any structures

to be built

9 Monitoring, checking, assessing, and undertaking physical verification and measurements of the

work done.

10 Facilitating the development of livelihood opportunities for the landless.

11 Maintaining project accounts.

12 Arranging physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken.

13 Setting up suitable arrangement for post-project operation, maintenance and future development of

the assets created during the project period

2.1.2 SWOT Analysis of the PIA

Strength:

1 Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team

2 Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, for

capacity building and technical guidance.

3 Scientific planning in watershed project with the help of SRSAC, Jodhpur

Jodhpur XV

4 District level monitoring, coordination & cooperation committee.

5 Well establishment of PRIs for social audits.

6 Watershed Dept. have long experience in watershed works and has won five national

productivity awards

Weakness:

1 Lack of proper supporting staff.

2 Only one permanent staff (J En WD&SC G. K. Nagla)

3 No permanent office building.

4 Unwanted political interference.

Opportunities:

1 Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less.

2 Improvement of socio-economic status of poor’s.

3 Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT

activities.

4 Reduction of migration rate.

5 Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the watershed

activities.

6 Over all integrated development of rural peoples

7 Independent DWDU, PIA & Watershed committee to over all monitoring and execution of

Jodhpur XV

activities.

Threats:

(1)Lack of sustainable agriculture development.

(2)Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.

(3)Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples.

(4)Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.

(5)Low literacy rate in the project area.

Jodhpur XV

CHAPTER - 3

BBBBBBBBAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSIIIIIIIICCCCCCCC IIIIIIIINNNNNNNNFFFFFFFFOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

OOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD

Jodhpur XV

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land use pattern

The net geographical area of watershed is about 3108 ha out of which 0.0 % is forest area.

About 39 % of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 7 % is cultivable and rest is

uncultivable. About 59.7 % of land is under agriculture from which 72.77 % is under rain-fed and a

kharif crop is taken, 27 % of land is irrigated by tube wells.

Table no. : 6 Land use pattern

Wasteland S.

No.

Name of

watershed

Geographical

area

Forest

area

(ha)

Land under

agri. Use

(ha)

Rain-fed

area

(ha)

Permanent

pasture

Cultivable

(ha)

Non

cultivable

(ha)

1 Lavera

Kalan IWMP

Jodhpur XV

3108 0.00 1855 1350 52 90 1111

3.1.2 Soil and topography

Lavera Kalan watershed project (Jodhpur XV) falls under North West Rajasthan Agro Climatic

Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and. The soil is brown to very dark grayish brown in surface

colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is

Jodhpur XV

loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and

potash. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols order. The topography of the area is moderate

ranging from 0-10% slope

Table no. : 7 Soil type and topography

Major soil types S.

No.

Name of Agro-

climatic zone

covers w/s area

Area in

ha

Name of villages

Type Area

Topography

1 I A 2706 Lavera Kalan Sandy to

Loamy sand

2706 Moderate

slope

2 I A 402 Hardhani Sandy to

Loamy sand

402 Moderate

slope

Table no. : 8 Flood and drought condition

S. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Lavera Kalan Nil Once in three year

2 Hardhani Nil Once in three year

Jodhpur XV

Jodhpur XV

Table no. : 9 Climatic conditions

Temperature (degree centigrade) S.

No.

Year Rainfall (mm)

Maximum Minimum

Highest intensity of

rainfall (mm in a

day)

Annual

Rainy days

1 2010 435 44.7 6.3 121 30

2 2009 139 44.1 7.1 44 8

3 2008 270.5 43.8 5.8 43 16

4 2007 200 43.5 6.2 30 15

5 2006 205 43.0 5.9 45 17

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three

years. The average rainfall of this area is about 250 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity

of 121 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the

streams resulting in silting of the village tank.

Table no. : 10 Physiography and relief

S. No. Micro w/s no

Area Highest contour level

Lowest contour

level

Level difference

Length of travel

% slope

1 16/1 225 365 306 59 3600 1.64

2 16/2 1257 369 293 76 8750 0.86

Jodhpur XV

3 16/3 344 366 307 59 3700 1.59

4 16/4 325 369 311 58 4850 1.19

5 16/5 362 335 309 26 4100 0.63

6 16/6 235 329 293 36 4260 0.84

7 16/7 477 339 292 47 4120 1.14

8 15/8 152 339 301 38 1955 1.94

9 15/9 250 318 291 27 3800 0.71

Table no. : 11 Slope Detail of watershed

S. No. Slope % Area

1 0-1 % 550

2 1-3 % 1407

3 3-5 % 980

4 5-10 % 540

5 10-15 % 120

6 15-35 % 30

Total 3627

Jodhpur XV

Table no.: 12 Erosion status in project Area

Cause Type of erosion

Water erosion

Area affected (ha) Run off(mm/

year)

Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year)

a Sheet 1114 300 4112

b Rill 232 300 4230

c Gully 207 300 4860

Sub-Total 13202

Wind erosion 780 NA 240

Total for project 13442

Project Area is affected by water erosion & wind erosion both, such that loss of soil fertility takes

place every year. Production depleting year by year. It is major problem of watershed

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

Lack of surface water source and very deep ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation

as well as drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 3.75 ha ranging from 1 to 20 ha. Lack of

irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects

directly the demographic profile of the watershed. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Bajra

(Pearl millet). Some of the farmers have Tube well as source of irrigation and take up Rabi crop also. The

Jodhpur XV

soil and moisture conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them

to take up rabi crop of Arandi and cumin in the residual moisture.

Table no. : 13 Land ownership details

Total owned land (ha)

Gen OBC SC ST

S. No. Village

No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area

1 Lavera

Kalan

165 890 220 940 271 200 12 50

2 Hardhani 38 172 40 185 12 26 0 0

Total owned land (ha)

Type of farmer

Large Small Marginal BPL

S. No. Village

No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area

1 Lavera

Kalan

400 1746 100 176 168 140 26 18

2 Hardhani 42 326 20 34 22 18 6 5

Jodhpur XV

Table No: 14 Land use & land classification

Arable Land

Non arable land

(community Land)

Road/

Other

total

land

Govt. Panchayat land

Irrigated

Un

Irrigated

fellow

DLT &

magra

Pastur

e

Nadi

Aagor

Habitatio

n

S.N.

Name of village Micro

no

Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

1 Lavera Kalan 16/1 90 55 10 60 0 5 3 2 225

2 Lavera Kalan 16/2 225 500 150 292 30 50 5 10 1257

3 Lavera Kalan 16/3 92 186 14 22 22 6 1 1 344

4 Lavera Kalan 16/4 40 112 18 132 0 21 1 1 325

5 Lavera Kalan 16/5 0 7 3 312 0 37 2 1 362

6 Lavera Kalan 16/6 58 94 13 40 0 28 1 1 235

7 Lavera Kalan 16/7 65 260 20 102 0 28 1 1 477

8 Lavera Kalan,

Hardhani 15/8 40 60 12 31 0 6 2 1 152

9 Hardhani 15/9 90 120 40 0 0 0 0 0 250

Table No: 15 Agriculture

Net sown area (ha) S. No. Village

One time Two times Three times

1 Lavera Kalan 1794 700 0

2 Hardhani 110 90 0

Jodhpur XV

Table No: 16 Crop details

Net sown area (ha.) in Kharif S.

No.

Village

Bajra Gowar Moong Moth Til Arandi

1 Lavera Kalan 680 134 124 277 48 95

2 Hardhani 50 40 30 20 10 10

Net sown area (ha.) in Rabi S. No. Village

Wheat Cumin Sarson Onion Isabgol

1 Lavera Kalan 36 97 121 32 63

2 Hardhani 8 6 5 10 6

Table No: 17 Crop production

Crop production Kg per ha. S. No.

Wheat Bajra Moong Moth Onion Arandi

1 3000 1800 400 400 24000 240

Jodhpur XV

3.1.4 Livestock

Majority of community in the watershed depends on cows and buffaloes for milk. Lack of rain reduced

the fodder availability for animals in watershed area. This leads to migration to other parts of the country

with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is very low and there is no dairy co operative in the

watershed.

Table No : 18 Livestock

S.

No.

Village Cow (No.) Buffalo

(No.)

Goat (No.) Sheep

(No.)

Camel

(No.)

Other

(No.)

1 Lavera Kalan 610 545 3120 3200 68 10

2 Hardhani 84 78 276 120 0 5

Table No: 19 Milk Production

Cow (ltr/annum) Buffalo (ltr/annum) Goat (ltr/annum) Total (ltr/annum) S. No. Village

No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk

1 Lavera

Kalan

210 4010 187 5170 1206 3200 1603 12380

2 Hardhani 26 510 23 640 85 265 134 1415

Jodhpur XV

Table No: 20 Drinking water

S. No. Village Ground water

table (Ft.)

Source of

drinking water

Availability in

months

Quality

1 Lavera Kalan 600 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

2 Hardhani 700 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

3.2 Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status

Lavera Kalan watershed project has a total of 736 households with a population of 4739 (as per

base-line survey) out of which 2443 are male and 2296 female .The sex ratio is 94 female to 1000 male.

There are 59 BPL families. The average family size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 25 per cent; male

literacy rate is 38 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 10.5 per cent (of

total female population). It is noticeable that only five persons have reached up to graduation standard.

The major castes in the watershed are Rajput, Jat, Devasi and Schedule Caste. Majority of population is

involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Jodhpur XV

Table No: 21 Demographic information

Population SC / ST population S. No. Village

Male Female Total Male Female Total

1 Lavera Kalan 2213 2116 4329 763 712 1475

2 Hardhani 1005 881 1886 134 112 246

Table No: 22 Literacy rate

Literacy S. No. Village

Total % Male % Female %

1 Lavera Kalan 1150 26.6 902 40.8 248 11.6

2 Hardhani 550 29.1 437 43.48 113 12.8

Table No: 23 Poverty

S.

No.

Village Total

household

Total BPL

HH

% of BPL

HH

Landless HH % of Land

less HH

1 Lavera Kalan 668 55 8.2 28 4.2

2 Hardhani 68 6 5.9 5 7.4

Jodhpur XV

3.2.2 Migration Pattern

People migrate during summer season to different parts of state and country like Jodhpur,

Bangalore, Mumbai and Pune as daily wagers and construction workers. Lack of irrigation facility,

employment and fodder availability force these people to migrate to other places.

Table No: 24 Migration details

Migration Migration by months S.

No.

Village Total

Population Total Male Female Up to 3

months

3-6

months

>6

months

Income

during

migration

1 Lavera Kalan 4329 350 330 20 200 100 50 3000

2 Hardhani 1886 65 60 5 30 25 5 3000

Table No: 25 Village infrastructures

S.

No.

Village Pucca

road to

village

Schools Aangan

wadi

Post office Milk

collection

centre

PHED

tube well

PHC

1 Lavera Kalan Yes 6 3 1 0 4 1

2 Hardhani Yes 2 1 0 0 1 0

Jodhpur XV

Table No: 26 Facilities / HH assets

S.

No.

Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with

phones

HHs with

vehicle

HHs

with

TV set

HHs

with

LPG

gas

HHs

with

fridge

HHs

with

Tube

Well

1 Lavera Kalan 480 45 450 240 85 42 17 117

2 Hardhani 35 8 28 10 6 3 3 11

The Lavera Kalan watershed comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If

they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops like mustard, cumin, Cotton, Moong etc. In case

of low rainfall they go for Bajra. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of Lavera Kalan

watershed.

The Lavera Kalan watershed area has low productivity because of the following

reasons:-

i) Full dependence on monsoon

Lavera Kalan watershed is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the

absence of proper irrigation facility, most of the cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon.

Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture

production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area

Jodhpur XV

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and

insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming

methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper

way that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery

Even today a large number of farmers in Lavera Kalan watershed use traditional methods of ploughing

and irrigation. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill, Combine harvester etc. So, old

machineries take more time in tillage practices

iv) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The

use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In Lavera Kalan, however, there are two

limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in Lavera

Kalan most of the land depends on rainfall, mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea.

This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land

v) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper

market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of

transportation and roads. and second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.

Jodhpur XV

Jodhpur XV

CHAPTER - 4

WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD

AAAAAAAACCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS

Jodhpur XV

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed

regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor

infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there

is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common

guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1 Scientific Planning

(i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-

watershed. The Lavera Kalan watershed project consists of nine micro-watersheds namely 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ;

15/8,9. Further Lavera Kalan watershed project is in continuation with other watersheds namely Nandia khurd-II

(Hariyali I), Chatalia (Hariyali IV), Kherapa (DDP IV) and Lavera kalan (Hariyali IV) projects, this gives an element

of continuation of the programme.

(ii) Base line survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed base line survey has to be

conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development

programme. A detailed base line survey was undertaken by WDT which involved household census survey, Bio-

physical survey and village level data collection. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which

was filled by visiting each and every household in the villages. This gave in the details of the demographic profile

Jodhpur XV

of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net

consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their

benefits.

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the villages. It included

the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of

irrigation in the field.

(iii) Participatory Rural Approach (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the

stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities

and their local indigenous technological knowledge while planning for any activity. Participatory Rural Approach

provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete

accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and the watershed

in specific. Various tools like matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations, fodder

crops, various institution and their significance in the life of farmers.

(iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

(A) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various parameters were taken

into account like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL population, Ground water status, Drinking water situation and Slope

percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of

Jodhpur XV

various watershed area.

(B) Planning

State Remote Sensing Application Centre has provided various maps like slope map, contour map, Land use land

cover map, Satellite image maps were used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in

the project area. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:10000 was used for identifying various

locations for soil and water conservation structures.

(C) Topographical survey of DLT

There is a good drainage line in the watershed, so for treatment of drainage line a topographical survey was

essential. This help in selection of site for LSCD, Nallah bunding and Masonry check dams.

Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project

S. No. Scientific criteria / inputs used Whether Scientific

criteria used

1 A. Planning

a. Cluster approach Yes

b. Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged?

If yes, mention the name of the institute

c. Baseline survey Yes

d. Hydro-geological survey Yes

e. Contour mapping Yes

f. Participatory Rural Approach (PRA) Yes

Jodhpur XV

g. Remote sensing data Yes

h. Ridge to valley treatment planning Yes

i. Online IT connectivity between -

(1) Project and DRDA cell / ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

j. Availability of GIS layers -

(1) Cadastral map

(2) Village boundaries Yes

(3) Drainage Yes

(4) Slope map Yes

(5) Land use Yes

(6) Ground water status No

(7) Watershed boundaries Yes

2 Inputs

(1) Bio- pesticides No

(2) Organic manure Yes

(3) Vermi-compost Yes

(4) Bio-fertilizer No

(5) Water saving devices Yes

Jodhpur XV

(6) Mechanized tools / Implements Yes

(7) Bio-fencing Yes

(8) Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy

The developmental strategy is two pronged- technical and social, both integrated for sustainable development

of natural resources. Social strategy is for creating awareness and capacity building of community for self-

motivation and long term commitment to the project for its sustainability. Technical strategy is for planning

designing & implementation of activities for development of natural resources

4.2.1 Social Strategy

• Participatory Approach for empowerment of Community: People’s participation is the key to sustainable

watershed development programmes.

• Demand Driven Project Proposals of the community and Flexibility in choice of Technology.

• Equity for Resource Poor and Women: In all watershed development projects thrust is on improving equity

by addressing needs of all sections of community

• Social Audit

• Linkages of Watershed community with Panchayat Raj Institutions: An important element of long term

sustainability is to forge linkages with permanent institutions in the area. So, linkages are forged between

the Panchayats and the watershed communities.

Jodhpur XV

4.2.2 Technical Strategy

• Ridge to Valley approach

• In-situ moisture conservation

• Reduce Runoff velocity

• Rain Water harvesting with the approach of ‘Water Budgeting

• Alternate land use i. e. Horticulture, Agro forestry, Pasture development & forestry plantation based on

land capability classification.

• Flexibility in choice of Technology: Taking account of the high degree of heterogeneity in the socio

economic and agro ecological conditions in rain fed areas, a high degree of flexibility is provided in the

choice of appropriate, at the watershed level

• Low cost, replicable & indigenous technologies

4.2.3 Water Budgeting

Strange’s table is used to calculate the total yield from watershed

Strange's Table

Yield from 1 hectare of Natural (Untreated) catchment

Good Catchment Average Catchment Bad Catchment Total

Monsoon

rainfall in mm

% of utilisable

rain water

Utilisable rain water

(Cum)

% of utilisable

rain water


(Cum)

% of utilisable

rain water


(Cum)

20 0.08 0.16 0.06 0.12 0.04 0.08

Jodhpur XV

40 0.13 0.52 0.0975 0.39 0.065 0.26

60 0.245 1.47 0.1735 1.041 0.1225 0.735

80 0.41 3.28 0.3075 2.46 0.205 1.64

100 0.7 7 0.525 5.25 0.35 3.5

120 0.9 10.8 0.675 8.1 0.45 5.4

140 1.1225 15.715 0.91875 12.8625 0.6125 8.575

160 1.625 26 1.21875 19.5 0.8125 13

180 2.12 38.16 1.59 28.62 1.06 19.08

200 2.7 54 2.025 40.5 1.35 27

220 3.26 71.72 2.445 53.79 1.63 35.86

240 3.81 91.44 2.8575 68.58 1.905 45.72

260 4.45 115.7 3.3375 86.775 2.225 57.85

280 5.19 145.32 3.3925 94.99 2.595 72.66

300 5.9 177 4.425 132.75 2.95 88.5

320 6.72 215.04 5.04 161.28 3.36 107.52

340 7.75 263.5 5.6775 193.035 3.785 128.69

360 8.55 307.8 6.4125 230.85 4.275 153.9

380 9.45 359.1 7.0876 269.3288 4.725 179.55

400 10.25 410 7.6875 307.5 5.125 205

420 11.05 464.1 8.2875 348.075 5.525 232.05

440 12 528 9 396 6 264

460 12.95 595.7 7.7125 354.775 6.475 297.85

480 13.9 667.2 10.425 500.4 6.95 333.6

500 14.7 735 11.025 551.25 7.35 367.5

520 15.5 806 11.625 604.5 7.75 403

540 16.36 883.44 12.2625 662.175 8.175 441.45

560 17.2 963.2 12.9 722.4 8.6 481.6

580 18 1044 13.5 783 9 522

600 19 1140 14.25 855 9.5 570

Jodhpur XV

Good catchment - Hills or plains with little cultivation and moderately absorbant soil Average catchment - Flat partly cultivated stiff gravely sandy absorbant soil Bad catchment - Flat and cultivated sandy soil

Table No. 28 Total available water

Micro w/s

no.

Area ha.

Type of catchment

Utilisable rain water/ ha (Cu.m.)

Utilisable rain water from micro w/s

(Cu.m.)

16/1 225 Average 132.75 29868.75

16/2 1257 Average 132.75 166866.75

16/3 344 Average 132.75 45666

16/4 325 Average 132.75 43143.75

16/5 362 Average 132.75 48055.5

16/6 235 Average 132.75 31196.25

16/7 477 Average 132.75 63321.75

15/8 152 Good 177 26904

15/9 250 Good 177 44250

Total 499272.75

Table No. 29 Water tapped in existing structure

S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (Cu.m.)

i) Major Irrigation Project 0 0

ii) Medium Irrigation Project 0 0

Jodhpur XV

iii) Form Ponds/Tanks 103 116000

iv) Anicuts 3 43000

Total 159000

Table No. 30 Balance available water

Total yield (Cu.m.) Net tapped water

(Cu.m.)

Balance

water

(Cu.m.)

Available for Harvesting

75% (Cu.m.)

1 2 (2-1) 0.75*3

499272.75 159000 340272.75 255204.5

The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area. Loose stone check dam, Masonry check

dam, Contour bunding, Dug out pond, Nallah bunding and water harvesting structure in arable land (Tanka) etc.

activities could be done.

Table No. 30a Activities planned for water harvesting

Activity No. Storage capacity per No.

(Cu.m.)

Total water to be

harvested (Cu.m.)

Tanka 70 25 1750

Anicut 12 4500 54000

LSCD 370 200 74000

Bunding 600 80 48000

Jodhpur XV

Dug out pond 20 490 9800

Nalla bund 46 10 460

PD 20 1770 35400

Total 223410

4.3 Institution building

4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

Watershed committee is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with

technical support of WDT. The committee is registered under society registration act 1860. The Gram Sabha

of the Gram Panchayat select the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a

paid functionary. In Lavera Kalan watershed two watershed committee were formed namely Lavera Kalan

w/s committee of Lavera kalan gram panchayat and Nandia kalan w/s committee of Nandia kalan gram

panchayat. Since the watershed covers area of two gram panchayat so separate watershed committee were

constituted.

Table No. 31 Watershed Committee Lavera Kalan

S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational

Qualification

1 Poona ram S/o Ghamanda ram President M OBC Graduate

2 Ganpat ram S/o Naru ram Secretary M OBC Secondry

3 Govind singh S/o Man singh Member M Gen Literate

Jodhpur XV

4 Hanuman singh S/o Hari singh Member M Gen Literate

5 Kesharam S/o Bhura ram Member M OC Literate

6 Jetharam S/o Manga ram Member M OBC Literate

7 Jagram S/o Biramram Member M SC Literate

8 Smt. Gomti W/o Premaram Member F SC Literate

9 Smt. Sumitra W/o Babu ram Member F SC Literate

10 Smt. Sua W/o Gokul ram Member F SC Literate

11 Smt. Santosh W/o Omaram Member F SC Literate

12 Dalu ram S/o Madaram Member M OBC Middle

Table No. 32 Watershed Committee Nandia kalan

S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational

Qualification

1 Sattu ram S/O Deraj Ram President M OBC Graduate

2 Babu ram S/O Ghamanda ram Secretary M OBC Secondry

3 Jassa ram S/o Kheta ram Member M OBC Literate

4 Gordhan S/o Kishna ram Member M OBC Literate

Jodhpur XV

5 Smt. Sharda W/o Aadu ram Member F OBC Literate

6 Karna ram S/o Rupa ram Member M OBC Literate

7 Smt. Pappudi W/o Purkha ram Member F ST Literate

8 Sohan singh S/o Vijay singh Member M General Literate

9 Bhagwan ram S/o Anada ram

Meghwal

Member M SC Literate

10 Girdhari ram S/o Tulchharam Member M OBC Literate

11 Smt Chhoti w/oGopalram Member M SC Literate

Details of Bank Account :

For each water shed committee, the separate saving bank account has been opened with the name of

Sarpanch, Secretary WC and WDT member (Junior Engineer). One separate Watershed Development Fund (WDF)

account will be opened for each committee. In the WDF Account no transaction will be done only the contribution

received from beneficiaries will be deposited. The details of bank account are :

Account No. S.No.

Watershed

Committee Saving A/C No. WDF A/C No.

Bank Name

1. Lavera Kalan 2826 Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank

2. Nandia Kalan 2827 Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank

Jodhpur XV

4.3.2 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and

thrift activities. Self Help Group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood, generally Self

Help Groups include landless and poor men and women.

Before formation of the SHGs during PRA activities focused group discussion (FGDs) were held with the

women, which came up with the following observations

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people.

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

Status of new SHG is shown in table no.33

4.3.3 User Group

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on

a long term basis. The User Group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and

manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership

with community spirit.

Jodhpur XV

Table No. 33 Status of SHG (New)

Gram Panchayat : Lavera Kalan Village : Lavera kalan S Name of Saving Since Details of Saving account in Bank Amount Financial Details of revolving fund Training

No. SHG per when Loan activities

if any received from any agency Received

(No. of Month saving Dt.of (with date) Agency Amount Status of

Members) (Rs.) Done by Name Opening taken of Fund Repayment

Group of Bank A/c No. the A/c from Bank (Rs.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1 Kriparam ji SHG (12 member)

100 10.01.11 Co-Operative Bank Baori

3039 09.03.11

2 Ishwar SHG (12 member)


3038 09.03.11

3 Ramdev SHG (13 member)


3037 09.03.11

4 Ramsukh das SHG (12 member)

100 20.02.11

5 Ma Sati SHG Ma Sati SHG (14 member)

50 05.01.11

6 Shri Kaveri Momen SHG

50 25.01.11

Jodhpur XV

4.4 Physical activities to be undertaken

4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed project to build a rapport with the village community at

the beginning of the project, generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local

community are taken up. A group discussion was conducted with watershed development committee

regarding the EPA activity. It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 18.648 Lakh was allotted for

EPA activity, which was 4% of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they

felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken

Gram Panchayat : Nandia Kalan Village : Hardhani

Details of Saving account in Bank

Details of revolving fund

received from any agency

S No.

Name of SHG (No. of

Members)

Saving per

Month (Rs.)

Since when

saving Done by

Group Name of Bank

A/c No

Dt .of Opening the A/c

Amount Loan

(with date)

taken from Bank

Financial

activities if any

Agency Amount of Fund (Rs.)

Status of Repayment

Training

Received

1 Saraswati SHG (15 member)


2929 16.08.10

2 Gopal krishan SHG 13 member)


2928 16.08.10

Jodhpur XV

which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an

instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table No. 34 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

S.

No.

Name of WC Amount

earmarked for

EPA

Entry Point Activity planned Estimated Cost

(Lakh)

Installation of Solar light 10.4

Rain water harvesting structure (Tanka) 5.036

1 Lavera Kalan 16.236

Repairing of Rain water harvesting

structure (Tanka)

0.8

2 Nandia Kalan 2.412 Installation of Solar light 2.412

S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabha approved

EPA

1 Lavera Kalan 10.06.10

2 Nandia Kalan 10.06.10

Jodhpur XV

4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES

4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY

Suitable forestry plants like Khejri, Ardoo, Desi Babool, Neem, Kumtha etc. are planted on the field

boundaries to meet the fuel & fodder requirements of the farmer.

4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE

Suitable horticulture plants like Mango, Lemon,

Guava, Ber, Pomegranate, Anwala etc. are grown

with the crops, to improve the income & nutrition

level of the cultivators. A water harvesting

structure (Tanka) is constructed to fulfill the water

requirement of horticulture plants

4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION

Jodhpur XV

To show the quantitative and qualitative difference between traditional and improved practices/ inputs and

in order to motivate the farmers to adopt improved agricultural practices/ inputs recommended by the

Research Institutions/ Department of Agriculture, demonstrations are conducted in a small area of 0.5 ha.

4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS

Organic manure is decomposed agricultural waste and cow dung, which is applied in the field in place of

chemical fertilizers. It is cheaper, locally available and without any kind of side effect.

4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS

Emphasis is given on developing backyard gardens to meet the day to day needs of the vegetables of the

villagers.

4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT

To meet the fuel, fodder, timber requirements of the community and to increase the carrying

capacity of the degraded pastures, proper fencing, planting and over seeding of grasses like

Dhaman, Sevan, Stylohameta is done on Govt./Panchayat and Pasture lands. Conservation

measures are also adopted to conserve soil and water. Contour furrows/ trenches are excavated on

the contours and pits are dug in the trenches for plantation.

Jodhpur XV

4.4.2.7 FENCING

Fencing is necessary to protect the production measures and pastures developed on non arable lands.

The fencing is designed in such a way that it intercepts runoff and conserves rain water. Different types of

fencing are as under:

1. DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)

This is most popular method of fencing. A ditch of particular cross section considering the type of the soil is

dug around the pasture area. The aim is to prevent cattle from entering the protected area. The soil so

excavated is used for construction of a bund. It can be fortified with local species of vegetation.

2. STONE WALL FENCING

Stone wall fencing is done in area where stone is locally available especially in hilly areas. The stone

wall is constructed to prevent the cattle from entering the protected area.

4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES

4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION

Cultivation is done along the contours. This forms the mini barriers across the flow path of the runoff,

which conserves rain water in situ & check soil erosion. Effectiveness of contour cultivation varies with

Jodhpur XV

slope, crop cover and soil. It is most effective on moderate slope ranging from 1 to 5%

4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE

Contour bunds are small earthen bunds

constructed along the contour on the agriculture

lands to check soil erosion and conserve

sufficient moisture to grow crops. These bunds

are purified with locally available vegetation like

Khus, Munja, Dhaman and Stylo Hamata are

raised on the bund.

4.4.3.3 V DITCH

These are constructed parallel to contour in areas of gentle slope to conserve in sito moisture and to

check velocity of run off.

Jodhpur XV

4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES

Number of rows of trenches are dug in hilly areas having steep slopes. Distance between two

trenches is kept equal to the length of a trench. Adjacent rows are staggered to reduce the maximum

length of runoff for better retention. These trenches check the velocity of runoff as well as conserve in-situ

moisture and check soil erosion.

4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)

Tanka is a covered masonry runoff storage tank

which collects runoff water from artificial

catchment constructed around it. It is also an age

old practice in the desert areas and is used for

harvesting surface runoff water for life saving

irrigation and drinking purposes.

4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM

Jodhpur XV

These structures are constructed in small and

medium size gullies using locally available

stones/ boulders as dry masonry. A waste weir is

also provided to discharge the peak runoff safely

from the catchment.

4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM

These are constructed in medium to large size gullies

by making earthen embankment in the nallah bed

across the drainage line duly supported by locally

available vegetation/ grass. They are provided where

separate surplus arrangement for water is available at

site.

Jodhpur XV

4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)

It is a water harvesting structure constructed in

middle to large drainage lines across the flow to

store surplus runoff . The pond is constructed near

the point of use where maximum water can be

stored requiring minimum amount of earth work.

The earthen bund is fortified with vegetation and

waste weir.

4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM

Jodhpur XV

It is a weir like masonry structure constructed

across the natural drain/ nallah which intercepts

the runoff from local catchment and stores it for

optimum utilization. This helps in recharging of

surrounding wells. The stored water can also be

used for lift or flow irrigation as well as for

drinking purposes of human and livestock

population. Due to these direct and indirect

benefits, masonry check dam is in great demand

in the rural areas.

CHAPTER - 5

PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED

DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT

PLANPLANPLANPLAN

Name of the Project IWMP XV Name of the Project IWMP XV Name of the Project IWMP XV

G.P. Nandia Kalan G.P. Lavera Kalan G.P. 2 NO.

Block Baori Block Baori Block Baori

District. Jodhpur District. Jodhpur District. Jodhpur

Village Covered 1 NO. Village

Covered

1 NO. Village Covered 2 NO.

Project outlay 60.3 LAC Project

outlay

405.9 LAC Project outlay 466.2 LAC

Total Area 402 Hectare Total Area 2706 Hectare Total Area 3108 Hectare

No. of WC's formed 1 No. of WC's formed 1 No. of WC's formed 2

QTY. RATE Amt from

project fund

Convergenc

e fund

Total Cost Beneficiary

contribution

QTY. RATE Amt from

project

fund

Convergen

ce fund


contributio

n

QTY. Amt from

project fund

Convergenc

e fund


contribution

I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 6.03 10% 40.6 10%

SUB TOTAL 6.030 6.030 0.0 40.590 40.590 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000

II MONITORING 1% 0.603 0.603 0.603 1% 4.1 4.059 4.059 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

III EVALUATION 1% 0.603 0.603 0.603 1% 4.1 4.059 4.059 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

7.236 7.236 0.0 48.708 48.708 55.944 0.000 55.944 0.000

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0.000 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 2.412 2.412 2.412 4% 16.2 16.236 16.236 4% 18.648 0.000 18.648 0.000

2.412 2.412 0.0 16.236 16.236 18.648 0.000 18.648 0.000

VTRAININGS & CAPACITY

BUILDING 5% 3.015 0.000 5% 20.3 0.000 0.000 5% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

3.015 3.015 0.0 20.295 20.295 23.310 0.000 23.310 0.000

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 0.603 0.603 0.603 1% 4.1 4.059 4.059 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

0.603 0.603 0.603 4.1 4.059 4.059 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

TOTAL 6.030 6.030 0.0 40.590 40.590 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN

TOTAL

TOTAL

S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY

GP NANDIA KALAN GP LAVERA KALAN

QTY. RATE Amt from

project fund

Convergenc

e fund


contribution

QTY. RATE Amt from

project

fund

Convergen

ce fund


contributio

n

QTY. Amt from

project fund

Convergenc

e fund


contribution

TOTAL



VII NRM 60% 60% 60% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

1ARABLE CONSERVATION

WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 160 8100 12.960 3.240 16.200 1.296 440 8100 35.640 45.360 81.000 6.48 600 48.600 48.600 97.200 7.776

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 17 80000 13.600 13.600 27.200 2.176 43 80000 34.400 34.400 68.800 5.504 60 48.000 48.000 96.000 7.680

(iii) Waste weir 12 12000 1.440 0.960 2.400 0.192 28 12000 3.360 3.840 7.200 0.576 40 4.800 4.800 9.600 0.768

(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah

Bunding 2 10000 0.200 0.200 0.016 27 10000 2.700 0.000 2.700 0.216 29 2.900 0.000 2.900 0.232

(v) Farm Pond 0 50000 0.000 0.000 0 10 50000 5.000 5.000 0.4 10 5.000 0.000 5.000 0.400

2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION

WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0.000 10 17900 1.790 0.000 1.790 10 1.790 0.000 1.790 0.000

(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for

PD 0 11800 0.000 0.000 10 11800 1.180 1.180 10 1.180 0.000 1.180 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 2 50000 1.000 1.000 2.000 8 50000 4.000 4.000 8.000 10 5.000 5.000 10.000 0.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 1.600 8 80000 6.400 6.400 10 8.000 0.000 8.000 0.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 4 22000 0.880 0.880 1.760 14 22000 3.080 3.080 6.160 18 3.960 3.960 7.920 0.000

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT

(i) LSCD 'A' 3 17800 0.534 0.534 92 17800 16.376 16.376 95 16.910 0.000 16.910 0.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 6 16500 0.990 0.990 134 16500 22.110 22.110 140 23.100 0.000 23.100 0.000

(iii) LSCD 'C' 6 15100 0.906 0.906 144 15100 21.744 21.744 150 22.650 0.000 22.650 0.000

(iv) LSCD 'D' 8 13800 1.104 1.104 142 13800 19.596 19.596 150 20.700 0.000 20.700 0.000

(v) LSCD 'E' 7 12400 0.868 0.868 143 12400 17.634 17.634 150 18.502 0.000 18.502 0.000

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.098 3.000 3.098 13 5 48.530 7.000 55.530 13 48.628 10.000 58.628 0.000

36.180 22.680 58.860 243.54 97.680 341.220 0 279.720 120.360 400.080 0.000

VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &

MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 9.045 15% 60.89 15%

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 160 200 0.320 0.080 0.400 0.128 440 200 0.880 1.120 2.000 0.64 600 1.200 1.200 2.400 0.768

2 Agro Forestry 950 50 0.475 0.475 0.152 8934 50 4.467 4.467 1.42944 9884 4.942 0.000 4.942 1.581

3Horticulture Plantation with

fencing & Tanka 17 15933 2.709 3.187 5.895 1.886 43 15933 6.851 6.373 13.224 4.2318 60 9.560 9.560 19.120 6.118

4Horticulture Plantation without

fencing (Orchard) 3 10000 0.300 0.300 0.096 47 10000 4.700 4.700 1.504 50 5.000 0.000 5.000 1.600

5 Vermi Compost 3 24000 0.720 0.720 0.230 22 23890 5.040 5.040 1.6128 25 5.760 0.000 5.760 1.843

6 Crop Demonstration 30 1200 0.360 0.360 0.115 270 1200 3.240 3.240 1.0368 300 3.600 0.000 3.600 1.152

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 15 400 0.060 0.060 0.019 85 400 0.340 0.340 0.1088 100 0.400 0.000 0.400 0.128

8 Medicinal Plants 8 1500 0.120 0.120 0.038 72 1500 1.080 1.080 0.3456 80 1.200 0.000 1.200 0.384

TOTAL

W/S WORK PHASE

QTY. RATE Amt from

project fund

Convergenc

e fund


contribution

QTY. RATE Amt from

project

fund

Convergen

ce fund


contributio

n

QTY. Amt from

project fund

Convergenc

e fund


contribution

TOTAL



For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 0 2200 0.000 0.000 10 2200 0.220 0.220 10 0.220 0.000 0.220 0.000

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900 0.000 0.000 10 900 0.090 0.090 10 0.090 0.000 0.090 0.000

3 Plantation in PD 1 0 0.000 0.000 10 4.9460 4.946 10 4.946 0.000 4.946 0.000

4 Plantation in PD 2 0 0.000 0.000 10 3.4480 3.448 10 3.448 0.000 3.448 0.000

5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0.000 10 0 3.527 3.527 10 3.527 0.000 3.527 0.000

6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 0 0.000 0.000 10 0 2.681 2.681 10 2.681 0.000 2.681 0.000

1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &

REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 2.700 2.700 0 0 7.906 7.906 0 10.606 0.000 10.606 0.000

2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT

(i.) Animal Health Camp 5 20000 1.000 1.000 45 20 9.000 9.000 50 10.000 0.000 10.000 0.000

(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 0.200 0.200 0 0 0.800 0.800 0 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 0 25000 0.000 0.000 3 25000 0.750 0.750 3 0.750 0.000 0.750 0.000

(iv) A I 0.081 0.081 0 0 0.919 0.919 0 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000

9.045 3.267 12.311 0 0.000 60.885 7.493 68.378 0 69.930 10.760 80.690 0.000

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 1.809 1.809 0.000 1.809 3% 12.177 12.177 0.000 12.177 3% 13.986 0.000 13.986 0.000GRAND TOTAL 60.300 25.947 86.246 6.346 405.900 105.173 511.073 24.085 466.200 131.120 597.320 30.431

TOTAL

CHAPTER - 6

ACTIVITY WISE ACTIVITY WISE ACTIVITY WISE ACTIVITY WISE

ABSTRACT OF COSTABSTRACT OF COSTABSTRACT OF COSTABSTRACT OF COST

Unit RATE QTY. Amt from project

fund

Convergence fund Total Cost Beneficiary

contribution

I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000

II MONITORING 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

III EVALUATION 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.648 0.000 18.648 0.000


BUILDING 5% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000

TOTAL 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60%

1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK

(i) Earthen Bund Ha. 8100 600 48.600 48.600 97.200 7.776

(ii) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 60 48.000 48.000 96.000 7.680

(iii) Waste weir No. 12000 40 4.800 4.800 9.600 0.768


Bunding No. 10000 29 2.900 0.000 2.800 0.224

(v) Farm Pond No. 50000 10 5.000 0.000 5.000 0.400


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD Ha. 17900 10 1.790 0.000 1.790 0.000

(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 11800 10 1.180 0.000 1.180 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond No. 50000 10 5.000 5.000 10.000 0.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 10 8.000 0.000 8.000 0.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with WW No. 22000 18 3.960 3.960 7.920 0.000

ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST


TOTAL


fund


contributionS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY

TOTAL


(i) LSCD 'A' No. 17800 95 16.910 0.000 7.120 0.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' No. 16500 140 23.100 0.000 11.550 0.000

(iii) LSCD 'C' No. 15100 150 22.650 0.000 12.080 0.000

(iv) LSCD 'D' No. 13800 150 20.700 0.000 11.040 0.000

(v) LSCD 'E' No. 12400 150 18.600 0.000 12.400 0.000

(vi) Masonry Check Dam No. 0 13 48.530 10.000 106.400 0.000

0 279.720 120.360 400.080 0.000

VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO

ENTERPRISES 15%

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund Ha. 200 600 1.200 1.200 2.400 0.768

2 Agro Forestry No. 50 9435 4.718 0.000 4.718 1.510

3Horticulture Plantation with fencing &

Tanka No. 15933 60 9.560 9.560 19.120 6.118

4Horticulture Plantation without fencing

(Orchard) No. 10000 50 5.000 0.000 5.000 1.600

5 Vermi Compost No. 36000 24 5.760 0.000 5.760 1.843

6 Crop Demonstration No. 2000 285 3.540 0.000 3.540 1.133

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden No. 1000 95 0.440 0.000 0.440 0.141

8 Medicinal Plants No. 3000 77 1.230 0.000 1.230 0.394

For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD Ha. 2200 10 0.220 0.000 0.220 0.000

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 900 10 0.090 0.000 0.090 0.000

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) Ha. 10 3.527 0.000 3.527 0.000

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) Ha. 10 2.681 0.000 2.681 0.000

TOTAL


fund


contributionS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY

TOTAL


REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 0 19.000 0.000 19.000 0.000


(i.) Animal Health Camp No. 25000 50 10.250 0.000 10.250 0.000

(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 0 0.988 0.000 0.988 0.000

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada No. 25000 3 0.750 0.000 0.750 0.000

(iv) A I 0 0.977 0.000 0.977 0.000

0 69.930 10.760 80.690 0.000

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.986 0.000 13.986 0.000GRAND TOTAL 466.200 131.120 597.320 30.354

TOTAL

Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7

G.P. 2 NO. 15/8,9

Block Baori IWMPDistrict. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009

Village Covered 4 NO.

Project outlay 466.2 LAC

Total Area 3108 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 6

No. of WC's formed 2 No. of UG's formed 18

Lavera

Kalan Hardhani

Geographical Area 3627 Ha

Effective Area 2706 402 3108 Ha

Project outlay 405.9 60.3 LAC

Total Arable land Ha

1. Irrigated 505 Ha

2. Unirrigated 1350 Ha

Total Nonarable land Ha

1. Pasture 52 Ha2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1201 Ha

Unit QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN

I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 46.62

1 WDT MANDEYA 13.054 11.365 1.688 13.054

2 W C SEC MANDEYA 8.392 7.306 1.085 8.392

3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY &

OTHER) 25.175 21.919 3.256 25.175

SUB TOTAL 46.620 40.590 6.030 46.620

II MONITORING 1% 4.662 4.662 4.059 0.603 4.662

III EVALUATION 1% 4.662 4.662 4.059 0.603 4.662

55.944 48.708 7.236 55.944

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.648 18.648

1 SOLAR LIGHT 45 24200 10.890 45 8.478 2.412 10.890

2 WATER TANKA 7 80000 5.600 7 5.600 0.000 5.600

3 REPAIRING OF TANKA 4 38000 1.520 4 1.520 0.000 1.520

6 OTHER 1 0.638 1 0.638 0.000 0.638

18.648 16.236 2.412 18.648

TotalHardhaniLavera Kalan

(WATERSHED COMMITTEE WISE BREAK UP)

Macro/Micro

Scheme/Batch

NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

Watershed Committee Watershed Committee

Date of Approval of the work plan

TOTAL

TOTAL

WATERSHED COMMITTEE WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-XV

S. N.Project


TotalHardhaniLavera KalanNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET


S. N.Project

V TRAININGS & CAPACITY BUILDING 5% 23.310

1 USERS GROUP

(i) KHARIF 4.810 3.810 1.000 4.810

(ii) RABI 3.000 2.500 0.500 3.000

(iii) HORTICULTURE 3.000 2.500 0.500 3.000

(iv) PASTURE DEVELOPMENT 3.000 3.000 0.000 3.000

2 OTHERS TRAINING & CO 9.500 8.485 1.015 9.500

23.310 20.295 3.015 23.310

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.662 4.662 1 4.059 0.603 4.662

4.662 4.662 1 4.059 0 0.603 0 4.662

TOTAL 46.620 40.590 6.030 46.620

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 279.720

1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 600 8100 48.600 440 35.640 160 12.960 600 48.600

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 60 80000 48.000 43 34.400 17 13.600 60 48.000

(iii) Waste weir 40 12000 4.800 28 3.360 12 1.440 40 4.800

(iv) Gulley Control Structure Nallah Bunding 29 10000 2.900 27 2.700 2 0.200 29 2.900

(v) Farm Pond 10 50000 5.000 10 5.000 0 0.000 10 5.000

2 NON ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 10 1.790 0 0.000 10 1.790

(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 11800 1.180 10 1.180 0 0.000 10 1.180

(iii) Dug out Pond 10 50000 5.000 8 4.000 2 1.000 10 5.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 10 80000 8.000 8 6.400 2 1.600 10 8.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 18 22000 3.960 14 3.080 4 0.880 18 3.960


(i) LSCD 'A' 95 17800 16.910 92 16.376 3 0.534 95 16.910

(ii) LSCD 'B' 140 16500 23.100 134 22.110 6 0.990 140 23.100

(iii) LSCD 'C' 150 15100 22.650 144 21.744 6 0.906 150 22.650

(iv) LSCD 'D' 150 13800 20.700 142 19.596 8 1.104 150 20.700

(v) LSCD 'E' 150 12400 18.600 143 17.634 7 0.966 150 18.600

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 13 5 48.530 13 48.530 0 0.000 13 48.530

279.720 0 243.540 0 36.180 0 279.720

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL


TotalHardhaniLavera KalanNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET


S. N.Project

VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO

ENTERPRISES 15% 69.930

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 600 200 1.200 440 0.880 160 0.320 600 1.200

2 Agro Forestry 8626 73 6.297 8934 4.467 950 0.475 9884 4.942

3 Horticulture Plantation with fencing & Tanka 60 21700 13.020 43 6.851 17 2.709 60 9.560

4Horticulture Plantation without fencing

(Orchard) 20 10000 2.000 47 4.700 3 0.300 50 5.000

5 Vermi Compost 15 36000 5.400 22 5.040 3 0.720 25 5.760

6 Crop Demonstration 180 2000 3.600 270 3.240 30 0.360 300 3.600

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 100 1000 1.000 85 0.340 15 0.060 100 0.400

8 Medicinal Plants 80 3000 2.400 72 1.080 8 0.120 80 1.200

For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 10 0.220 0 0.000 10 0.220

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 900.000 0.090 10 0.090 0 0.000 10 0.090

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 10 3.527 10 3.527 0 0.000 10 3.527

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 10 2.681 0 0.000 10 2.681

1TOOLKIT, TRAINING & REVOLVING

FUND OF SHG

(i) KARIGER 8 26250 2.100 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 5 40500 2.025 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

(iii) TAILORING 5 67000 3.350 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

(iv) MASALA UDYOG 5 42200 2.110 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 8 34000 2.720 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 2 22000 0.440 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 6 50000 3.000 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!


(i.) Animal Health Camp 40 25000 10.000 45 9.000 5 1.000 50 10.000

(ii) Vaccination 1.000 0 0.800 0 0.200 0 1.000

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 0.750 3 0.750 0 0.000 3 0.750

(iv) A I 1.000 0 0.919 0 0.081 0 1.000

69.930 #REF! #REF! #REF!

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.986 13.986 12.177 1.809 13.986GRAND TOTAL 466.200 #REF! #REF! #REF!

TOTAL

CHAPTER - 7

ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL

ACTION PLANACTION PLANACTION PLANACTION PLAN

Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Geographical Area 3627 Ha

G.P. 2 NO. 15/8,9 Effective Area 3108 Ha

Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land Ha

District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 505 Ha

Village Covered 2 NO. 2. Unirrigated 1350 Ha

Project outlay 466.2 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha

Total Area 3108 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 12 1. Pasture 52 Ha

No. of WC's formed 2 No. of UG's formed 18 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1201 Ha

QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN


SUB TOTAL 46.620 9.324 9.324 9.324 9.324 9.324 46.620

II MONITORING 1% 4.662 4.662 0.932 0.932 0.932 0.932 0.932 4.662

III EVALUATION 1% 4.662 4.662 2.331 2.331 4.662

55.944 0 0.000 10.256 10.256 12.587 10.256 12.587 55.944

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.648 18.648

18.648 0 0.000 18.648 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 18.648


BUILDING 5% 23.310

23.310 0 0.000 2.200 8.000 6.900 6.000 0.210 0 23.310

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.662 4.662 0.000 1 4.662 1 4.662

4.662 4.662 0 0.000 1 4.662 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 4.662

TOTAL 46.620 0 0.000 25.510 8.000 6.900 6.000 0.210 46.620

THIRD YEAR

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-XV

FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL

Date of Approval of the

work plan

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

NAME OF ACTIVITYS. N.TARGET

(YEAR WISE BREAK UP)

Macro/Micro

Scheme/Batch

FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR


THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL



W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 279.720 0 0 46.620 69.930 69.930 55.944 37.296 279.720


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 600 8100 48.600 0 0 100 8.100 310 25.110 100 8.100 80 6.480 10 0.810 600 48.600

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 60 80000 48.000 0 0 20 16.000 20 16.000 10 8.000 7 5.600 3 2.400 60 48.000

(iii) Waste weir 40 12000 4.800 0 0 15 1.800 8 0.960 8 0.960 4 0.480 5 0.600 40 4.800


Bunding 29 10000 2.900 0 0 11 1.100 4 0.400 2 0.200 8 0.800 4 0.400 29 2.900

(v) Farm Pond 10 50000 5.000 0 0 3 1.500 2 1.000 2 1.000 3 1.500 0 0.000 10 5.000


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 0 0 10 1.790 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.790


PD 10 11800 1.180 0 0 10 1.180 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.180

(iii) Dug out Pond 10 50000 5.000 0 0 2 1.000 4 2.000 2 1.000 0.000 2 1.000 10 5.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 10 80000 8.000 0 0 2 1.600 4 3.200 2 1.600 0.000 2 1.600 10 8.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 18 22000 3.960 0 0 7 1.540 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 4 0.880 18 3.960


(i) LSCD 'A' 95 17800 16.910 0 0 10 1.780 10 1.780 10 1.780 40 7.120 25 4.450 95 16.910

(ii) LSCD 'B' 140 16500 23.100 0 0 20 3.300 10 1.650 20 3.300 40 6.600 50 8.250 140 23.100

(iii) LSCD 'C' 150 15100 22.650 0 0 20 3.020 10 1.510 20 3.020 50 7.550 50 7.550 150 22.650

(iv) LSCD 'D' 150 13800 20.700 0 0 20 2.760 15 2.070 10 1.380 80 11.040 25 3.450 150 20.700

(v) LSCD 'E' 150 12400 18.600 0 0 25 3.100 15 1.860 25 3.100 60 7.440 25 3.100 150 18.600

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 13 48.530 0 0 0 0.020 2 8.980 10 36.050 0 0.674 1 2.806 13 48.530

279.720 0.000 46.620 69.930 69.930 55.944 37.296 279.720


MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 69.930

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 600 200 1.200 0 0 0.000 300 0.600 200 0.400 80 0.160 20 0.040 600 1.200

2 Agro Forestry 9884 50 4.942 0 0 0.000 4000 2.000 2000 1.000 2000 1.000 1884 0.942 9884 4.942


fencing & Tanka 60 15933 9.560 0 0 10 1.593 30 4.780 10 1.593 8 1.275 2 0.319 60 9.560


fencing (Orchard) 50 10000 5.000 0 0 0.000 10 1.000 5 0.500 5 0.500 30 3.000 50 5.000

5 Vermi Compost 25 23040 5.760 0 0 1 0.230 5 1.152 7 1.613 7 1.613 5 1.152 25 5.760

6 Crop Demonstration 300 1200 3.600 0 0 10 0.120 50 0.600 50 0.600 40 0.480 150 1.800 300 3.600

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 100 400 0.400 0 0 20 0.080 30 0.120 30 0.120 20 0.080 0 0.000 100 0.400

8 Medicinal Plants 80 1500 1.200 0 0 10 0.150 20 0.300 20 0.300 20 0.300 10 0.150 80 1.200

TOTAL


THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL



For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 0 0 0.000 10 0.220 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.220

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 900.000 0.090 0 0 0.000 10 0.090 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.090

3 Plantation in PD 1 10 4.946 0 0 0.000 10 3.400 0.600 0.500 0 0.446 10 4.946

4 Plantation in PD 2 10 3.448 0 0 10 2.100 0.500 0.450 0 0.398 10 3.448

5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 10 3.527 0 0 0.000 10 3.527 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 3.527

6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0 0 0.000 10 2.681 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681


REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 10.606 10.606

2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0

(i.) Animal Health Camp 50 20000 10.000 0 0 2 0.400 10 2.000 10 2.000 10 2.000 18 3.600 50 10.000

(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 1.000 0 0 0.200 0.300 0.300 0.100 0.100 0 1.000

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 0.750 0 0 0.000 2 0.500 1 0.250 0.000 0.000 3 0.750

(iv) A I 1.000 0 0 0.200 0.300 0.300 0.100 0.100 0 1.000

69.930 0.000 2.974 25.670 10.076 8.557 12.047 69.930

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.986 13.986 0.000 8.392 5.594 13.986

GRAND TOTAL 466.200 0.000 85.360 113.856 99.494 89.149 67.734 466.200

TOTAL


G.P. 2 NO. 15/8,9 Effective Area 3108 Ha








W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM


WORK

1 Earthen Bund 600 8100 48.600 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 100 8.100 100 8.100 80 6.480 320 25.920 600 48.600

2 WHS (Tanka) 60 80000 48.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 20 16.000 10 8.000 7 5.600 23 18.400 60 48.000

3 Waste weir 40 12000 4.800 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 8 0.960 8 0.960 4 0.480 20 2.400 40 4.800


WORK

1 Dug out Pond 10 50000 5.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 4 2.000 2 1.000 0.000 4 2.000 10 5.000

2 Nallah Bunding with WW 18 22000 3.960 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 11 2.420 18 3.960


1 Masonry Check Dam 2 5 10.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 5.000 1 5.000 2 10.000

120.360 0.000 27.500 18.500 18.220 56.140 120.360


MICRO ENTERPRISES

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 600 200 1.200 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 100 0.200 100 0.200 80 0.160 320 0.640 600 1.200


fencing & Tanka 60 15933 9.560 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 20 3.187 10 1.593 7 1.115 23 3.665 60 9.560

10.760 0.000 3.387 1.793 1.275 4.305 10.760GRAND TOTAL 131.120 0.000 30.687 20.093 19.335 59.805 131.120

FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEAR

(YEAR WISE BREAK UP) (Through Convergence)

Macro/Micro

Scheme/Batch


work plan

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-XV (Through Convergence)

S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR

Name of the Project IWMP XV 15/8,9 Geographical Area 402 Ha

G.P. Nandia Kalan HARDHANI Effective Area 402 Ha









SUB TOTAL 6.030 0 0 1.206 1.206 1.206 1.206 1.206 6.030

II MONITORING 1% 0.603 0.603 0 0 0.121 0.121 0.121 0.121 0.121 0.603

III EVALUATION 1% 0.603 0.603 0 0 0.302 0.302 0.603

7.236 0 0.000 1.327 1.327 1.628 1.327 1.628 7.236

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0 0

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 2.412 2.412 0 0

2.412 0 0.000 2.412 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.412


BUILDING 5% 3.015 0 0

3.015 0 0.000 0.400 1.000 1.100 0.515 0.000 0 3.015


0.603 0.603 0 0.000 1 0.603 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.603

TOTAL 6.030 0 0.000 3.415 1.000 1.100 0.515 0.000 6.030

FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR


Macro/Micro

Scheme/Batch

TOTAL


work plan

SIXTH YEAR

Village

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE HARDHANI

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL



SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEARTOTAL

SIXTH YEAR

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 36.180 0 0 6.030 9.045 9.045 7.236 4.824 36.180


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 160 8100 12.960 0 0 10 0.810 50 4.072 40 3.205 53 4.258 7 0.615 160 12.960

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 17 80000 13.600 0 0 2 1.600 4 3.200 7 5.600 3 2.400 1 0.800 17 13.600

(iii) Waste weir 12 12000 1.440 0 0 1 0.120 4 0.480 2 0.240 0 0.000 5 0.600 12 1.440


Bunding 2 10000 0.200 0 0 1 0.100 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200

(v) Farm Pond 0 50000 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


PD 0 11800 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 2 50000 1.000 0 0 1 0.500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 1 0.500 2 1.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 0 0 1 0.800 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 1 0.800 2 1.600

(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 4 22000 0.880 0 0 1 0.220 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 3 0.660 4 0.880


(i) LSCD 'A' 3 17800 0.534 0 0 0 0.000 1 0.178 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.356 3 0.534

(ii) LSCD 'B' 6 16500 0.990 0 0 3 0.495 1 0.165 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.330 6 0.990

(iii) LSCD 'C' 6 15100 0.906 0 0 2 0.302 2 0.302 0 0.000 2 0.302 0 0.000 6 0.906

(iv) LSCD 'D' 8 13800 1.104 0 0 4 0.552 2 0.276 0 0.000 2 0.276 0 0.000 8 1.104

(v) LSCD 'E' 7 12400 0.966 0 0 4 0.531 3 0.372 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.063 7 0.966

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

36.180 0.000 6.030 9.045 9.045 7.236 4.824 36.180


MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 9.045 0.035

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 160 200 0.320 0 0 0.000 60 0.120 40 0.080 53 0.106 7 0.014 160 0.320

2 Agro Forestry 950 50 0.475 0 0 0.000 100 0.050 150 0.075 228 0.114 472 0.236 950 0.475


fencing & Tanka 17 15933 2.709 0 0 2 0.319 4 0.637 7 1.115 3 0.478 1 0.159 17 2.709


fencing (Orchard) 3 10000 0.300 0 0 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200 0 0.000 0 0.000 3 0.300

5 Vermi Compost 3 24000 0.720 0 0 0 0.000 1 0.240 1 0.240 0 0.000 1 0.240 3 0.720

6 Crop Demonstration 30 1200 0.360 0 0 5 0.060 5 0.060 5 0.060 0.000 15 0.180 30 0.360

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 15 400 0.060 0 0 5 0.020 5 0.020 0 0.000 5 0.020 0 0.000 15 0.060

8 Medicinal Plants 8 1500 0.120 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 5 0.075 0 0.000 3 0.045 8 0.120

TOTAL




SIXTH YEAR

For Non-arable Land 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

1 V Ditch for PD 0 2200.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

3 Plantation in PD 1 0 0.000

4 Plantation in PD 2 0 0.000

5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 2.700 2.700

2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0

(i.) Animal Health Camp 5 20000 1.000 0 0 1 0.200 1 0.200 1 0.200 1 0.200 1 0.200 5 1.000

(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 0.200 0 0 0.000 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 0.200

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 0 25000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) A I 0.081 0 0 0.000 0.020 0.030 0.000 0.031 0 0.081

9.045 0.000 0.599 1.497 2.125 0.968 1.155 9.045


GRAND TOTAL 60.300 0.000 11.370 12.869 13.898 11.131 8.331 60.300

TOTAL

Name of the Project IWMP XV 15/8,9 Geographical Area 402 Ha

G.P. Nandia Kalan HARDHANI Effective Area 402 Ha








W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM


WORK

1 Earthen Bund 40 8100 3.240 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 20 1.620 20 1.620 40 3.240

2 WHS (Tanka) 17 80000 13.600 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 7 5.600 3 2.400 7 5.600 17 13.600

3 Waste weir 8 12000 0.960 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 4 0.480 4 0.480 8 0.960


WORK

1 Dug out Pond 2 50000 1.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 2 1.000 2 1.000

2 Nallah Bunding with WW 4 22000 0.880 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 4 0.880 4 0.880


1 Masonry Check Dam 1 3.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 3.000 1 3.000

22.680 0.000 0.000 5.600 4.500 12.580 22.680



For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 40 200 0.080 0.0 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 20 0.040 20 0.040 40 0.080


fencing & Tanka 20 15933 3.187 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 7 1.115 3 0.478 10 1.593 20 3.187

3.267 0.000 0.000 1.115 0.518 1.633 3.267GRAND TOTAL 25.947 0.000 0.000 6.715 5.018 14.213 25.947

SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR


Macro/Micro

Village

Scheme/Batch

SIXTH YEARTOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL


work plan

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE HARDHANI (Through Convergence)


FIRST YEAR


G.P. Lavera Kalan Lavera Kalan Effective Area 2706 Ha

Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land 0 Ha



Project outlay 405.9 LAC Total Nonarable land 0 Ha





SUB TOTAL 40.590 0 0 8.118 8.118 8.118 8.118 8.118 40.590

II MONITORING 1% 4.059 4.059 0 0 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.812 4.059

III EVALUATION 1% 4.059 4.059 0 0 2.030 2.030 4.059

48.708 0 0.000 8.930 8.930 10.959 8.930 10.959 48.708

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0 0

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 16.236 16.236 0 0

16.236 0 0.000 16.236 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.236


BUILDING 5% 20.295 0 0

20.295 0 0.000 1.800 7.000 5.800 5.485 0.210 0 20.295


4.059 4.059 0 0.000 1 4.059 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 4.059

TOTAL 40.590 0 0.000 22.095 7.000 5.800 5.485 0.210 40.590


SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR


Macro/Micro

Scheme/Batch

TOTAL


work plan

SIXTH YEAR

Village

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE LAVERA KALAN

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL




SIXTH YEAR

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 243.540 0 0 40.590 60.885 60.885 48.708 32.472 243.540


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 440 8100 35.640 0 0 90 7.290 260 21.038 60 4.895 27 2.222 3 0.195 440 35.640

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 43 80000 34.400 0 0 18 14.400 16 12.800 3 2.400 4 3.200 2 1.600 43 34.400

(iii) Waste weir 28 12000 3.360 0 0 14 1.680 4 0.480 6 0.720 4 0.480 0 0.000 28 3.360


Bunding 27 10000 2.700 0 0 10 1.000 4 0.400 2 0.200 8 0.800 3 0.300 27 2.700

(v) Farm Pond 10 50000 5.000 0 0 3 1.500 2 1.000 2 1.000 3 1.500 0 0.000 10 5.000


WORK 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 0 0 0 0.000 10 1.790 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.790


PD 10 11800 1.180 0 0 0 0.000 10 1.180 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.180

(iii) Dug out Pond 8 50000 4.000 0 0 1 0.500 4 2.000 2 1.000 0 0.000 1 0.500 8 4.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 8 80000 6.400 0 0 1 0.800 4 3.200 2 1.600 0 0.000 1 0.800 8 6.400

(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 14 22000 3.080 0 0 6 1.320 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 1 0.220 14 3.080

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(i) LSCD 'A' 92 17800 16.376 0 0 10 1.780 9 1.602 10 1.780 40 7.120 23 4.094 92 16.376

(ii) LSCD 'B' 134 16500 22.110 0 0 17 2.805 9 1.485 20 3.300 40 6.600 48 7.920 134 22.110

(iii) LSCD 'C' 144 15100 21.744 0 0 18 2.718 8 1.208 20 3.020 48 7.248 50 7.550 144 21.744

(iv) LSCD 'D' 142 13800 19.596 0 0 16 2.208 13 1.794 10 1.380 78 10.764 25 3.450 142 19.596

(v) LSCD 'E' 143 12400 17.634 0 0 21 2.569 12 1.488 25 3.100 60 7.440 25 3.037 143 17.634

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 13 5 48.530 0 0 0 0.020 2 8.980 10 36.050 0 0.674 1 2.806 13 48.530

243.540 0.000 40.590 60.885 60.885 48.708 32.472 243.540



For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 440 200 0.880 0 0 0.000 0.000 240 0.480 160 0.320 27 0.054 13 0.026 440 0.880

2 Agro Forestry 8934 50 4.467 0 0 0.000 0.000 3900 1.950 1850 0.925 1772 0.886 1412 0.706 8934 4.467


fencing & Tanka 43 15933 6.851 0 0 8.000 1.275 26 4.143 3 0.478 5 0.797 1 0.159 43 6.851


fencing (Orchard) 47 10000 4.700 0 0 0.000 0.000 9 0.900 3 0.300 5 0.500 30 3.000 47 4.700

5 Vermi Compost 22 23890 5.040 0 0 1.000 0.230 4 0.912 6 1.373 7 1.613 4 0.912 22 5.040

6 Crop Demonstration 270 1200 3.240 0 0 5.000 0.060 45 0.540 45 0.540 40 0.480 135 1.620 270 3.240

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 85 400 0.340 0 0 15.000 0.060 25 0.100 30 0.120 15 0.060 0 0.000 85 0.340

8 Medicinal Plants 72 1500 1.080 0 0 10.000 0.150 20 0.300 15 0.225 20 0.300 7 0.105 72 1.080

TOTAL




SIXTH YEAR

For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 0.220 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.220

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 900.000 0.090 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 0.090 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.090

3 Plantation in PD 1 10 4.946 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.000 3.400 0.000 0.600 0.000 0.500 0 0.446 10 4.946

4 Plantation in PD 2 10 3.448 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.000 2.100 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.450 0 0.398 10 3.448

5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 10 3.527 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 3.527 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 3.527

6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 2.681 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681


REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 0 7.906 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 7.906


(i.) Animal Health Camp 45 20 9.000 0 0 1.000 0.200 9.000 1.800 9 1.800 9 1.800 17 3.400 45 9.000

(ii) Vaccination 0 0.800 0 0 0.000 0.200 0.000 0.250 0 0.250 0 0.050 0 0.050 0 0.800

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 0.750 0 0 0.000 0.000 2.000 0.500 1 0.250 0 0.000 0 0.000 3 0.750

(iv) A I 0 0.919 0 0 0.000 0.200 0.000 0.280 0 0.270 0 0.100 0 0.069 0 0.919

60.885 0.000 2.375 24.173 7.951 7.589 10.891 60.885


GRAND TOTAL 405.900 0.000 73.990 100.987 85.595 78.018 59.403 405.900

TOTAL


G.P. Lavera Kalan Lavera Kalan Effective Area 2706 Ha

Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land 0 Ha



Project outlay 405.9 LAC Total Nonarable land 0 Ha




W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 243.540 40.590 60.885 60.885 48.708 32.472 243.540


WORK

1 Earthen Bund 560 8100 45.360 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 100 8.100 100 8.100 60 4.860 300 24.300 560 45.360

2 WHS (Tanka) 43 80000 34.400 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 20 16.000 3 2.400 4 3.200 16 12.800 43 34.400

3 Waste weir 32 12000 3.840 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 8 0.960 8 0.960 0 0.000 16 1.920 32 3.840


WORK 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

1 Dug out Pond 8 50000 4.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 4 2.000 2 1.000 0 0.000 2 1.000 8 4.000

2 Nallah Bunding with WW 14 22000 3.080 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 7 1.540 14 3.080

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

1 Masonry Check Dam 1 5 7.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 5.000 0 2.000 1 7.000

97.680 0.000 27.500 12.900 13.720 43.560 97.680



For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 560 200 1.120 0.0 0.0 0.000 100 0.200 100 0.200 60 0.120 300 0.600 560 1.120


fencing & Tanka 40 6.373 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.000 20 3.187 3 0.478 4 0.637 13 2.071 40 6.373

7.493 0.000 3.387 0.678 0.757 2.671 7.493GRAND TOTAL 105.173 0.000 30.687 13.378 14.317 45.591 105.173

SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR


Macro/Micro

Village

Scheme/Batch

SIXTH YEARTOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL


work plan

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE LAVERA KALAN


FIRST YEAR

Jodhpur XV

CHAPTER - 8

PPPPPPPPRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT

OOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS

Jodhpur XV

1. Project Outcome :

By the end of the project, in the project area, it is expected that the water level in the tube-wells increases

considerably and sufficient water for man and productivity should be increased after the completion of the project.

Few parameters which are expected to be increased after the completion of completion as the project are as follow :

S. No. Parameters Before Execution of

Project

Expected Increase after the

Completion of the Project

1 Availability of water

a. Average Water Table in the

Wells

650 ft 300-350 ft.

b. Available Water in the Wells/Tube Wells Wells/Tube Wells/Ponds

2. Agriculture/ Horticulture

a. Total Sowing Area

b. (Net) Sown Area (ha)

c. Production of Major Crops:

• Wheat

• Bajara

• Moong

26-29 quintal/ ha.

15-18 quintal/ ha.

3.5-4 quintal/ ha.

35-40 quintal/ ha.

20-25 quintal/ ha.

5-6 quintal/ ha.

d. Production of Rajka 600-700 quintal 800-1000 quintal

Jodhpur XV

e. Average Production of

Horticulture Plants

50-100 quintal

350-500 quintal

(Different types of fruits plants

Mango, Guava, Ber, Papaya, etc)

3. Live Stock

a. Milk Production 3-7 kg/ animal 7-12 kg/ animal

b. Animal Diseases By regular camps, the various diseases will be reduced

4. Livelihood

a. Average income of family by

introduction of other micro

enterprises

Rs.2500-3000

per month

Rs.4000-5000

per month

b. SHG Groups 10 60 The various homogenous groups

will be constituted and the training of

different activities will be given,

especially for land less families.

During the project period (5-7 years), the various activities will be done. The natural resource management

activities will be done in between the project phase. The proposed NRM works in arable, non arable land and

Jodhpur XV

drainage line treatment will increase the water table, production of agriculture/horticulture crops. Similarly the

livestock will increase the milk production. the year wise various outcomes of the project are as follows :

During the Project Period S.

No.

Activity Unit Before

Project I Yr II Yr III Yr IV Yr V Yr VI Yr VII Yr

1. Engineering Structure

a.

Contour Bund, CVH,

Restoration of Old

structures, Gully

Control Structure

Hect. Nil 1000 2000 700

b. Earth Bunds, WHS,

Anicut

No. Nil

2. Increase of Agriculture Production due to construction of above Engineering Structure

a. Rabi Season (Main

Crops)

• Wheat

• Mustard

Qtl/ ha 29

12

29

12

29

12

35

14

37

15

39

16

40

18

40-50

18-20

b. Kharif Season (Main

Crops)

Jodhpur XV

• Bajra

• Guar

Qtl/ ha 12.5

5.50

12.5

5.5

12.5

5.5

14

6.0

15

8

18

9

20

10

20-25

10-12

3. Increase of Area of Agriculture Production of Engineering Structure

a. Rain fed Area Ha. 1350 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%

b. Irrigated Area Ha. 385 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%

c. Vegetable Area Ha. 20 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%

d. Pasture Development Ha. Nil 10 20

4. Water Table Depth

• May m. 190 160 150 140 130 120

• September m. 170 155 145 135 125 115

• December

m. 180 158 148 138 128 118

5. Availability of

Drinking Water

Dec. Dec. Dec. Dec. Jan. Jan. March May

6. Survival of Plants

• Horticulture

Plants

Nos. 20 30 500 2500 5000 8000 10000 10000

• Forestry Plants Nos. 100 50 450 1000 2500 4000 6000 8000

7. Milk Production per animal

Jodhpur XV

• Cow Kg. 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 6 7 7

• Buffalo Kg. 7.5 7.5 7.5 8 8 8 9 9

• Goat Kg. 2.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 3 3 3

8. Control on Migration No. Nil 10% 30% 40% 70% 80%

Critical Assumption

• No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters

• Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.

• There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before irreversible damage is done.

• Adverse market conditions do not persist long.

• Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed particularly in the rural areas.

• Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and appropriate technical advice

and services are provided to farmers whenever required.

• The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs and feedback from

participants.

• The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District and State level Implementing

Agencies

Means of Verification of indicators

• Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning, mid-term and end of the project

period

Jodhpur XV

• Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.

• Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies.

• Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/ Individual beneficiaries/project-related

village and local bodies/PRIs.

• External review missions

• Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater, Irrigation, Animal Husbandry

Bund

40

Outer Length 40 mtr

Inner Length 36 mtr

Outer Width 15 mtr

Inner Width 11 mtr 15 11

Depth 1 mtr

Upper Area 600

Lower Area 396

Estimate of Dug out Pond

Lower Area 396

36

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Upper

Area

Lower

Area

Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Layout for Pond 2 102 1 1 204.00 Cu.m. 0.70 142.80

2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist and

disposal of excavated material within

initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m

2.1 In hard soil 119(b) 1 600 396 1 498.00 Cu.m. 85.00 42330.00

3 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick

including supply of stones

124

1 52 1 0.2 10.40 Cu.m. 590.00 6136.00

48608.80

Add 3% contingency 1458.3

Total 50067.1

Say 50000.0

Total Area 600 ha

No. of Waste Weir 40

Name of work Conservation

Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

Earthen Bund 4860000 120000 4980000

Waste Weir 480000 0 480000.00

5340000 120000 5460000.00

Say 54.60 Lakh

Conservation Measure 5340000.00

Production Measure 120000.00

Abstract of Cost

VEGETATIVE EARTHEN BUND IN ARABLE LAND

CROSS-SECTION OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND

Top width =Based on seepage line check

Slope of seepage line 3:1

0.6

1.5 :1

1 :1 US

DS 1

0.6

1 1.5

0.1 1.8 1.2 0.45 m

3.13.1

4.11 m

CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht

2

CS = 1.85 Sq.m.

Average Cross section 1.85 Sq.m.

Length 1.00 m.

Quantity 1.85 Cu.m.

DESIGN OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND

V.I = 0.305 (XS+Y)

0.305(0.8 x 2+1.0)

V.I = 0.549

V.I Vertical interval

X= Rain Fall Factor 0.80.8

Y= Factor due to soil infiltration & Crop cover 11

S= Percent slope 21

He= (Re x VI)1/2

(50) 1/2

He= 0.6199 Say 0.60 m

He Depth of impounding

Re 24Hour rainfall excess in Cms. for 10 year recurrence interval 35

V.I Vertical interval 0.549

Total Height of Bund = 0.6 + 0.4 1.00 m

Top width of Bund = 0.6 m

Bottom width of Bund = 3.1 m

Cross section of bund = (Top width of Bund +Bottom width of Bund) x Height

2

X Section= ( 0.60+3.1) x 1.00

2

X Section= 1.85 Sq.m.

Drawing of Waste Weir

3

SECTION AT A A'

1.5

3.3

2'

2.5

9.0 '

9.00 '

2'

1' 6"

A A'

2.5

Construction of Waste Weir

8

PLAN

Construction of Waste Weir

DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST

L B D/H Feet Metre Lab Total Lab Total

1 2 9.5 2 2 76

2 2 2 2 16

1 7.5 2.5 2 37.5

0

0

129.5 3.66485 cum. 92.00 92.00 337.166 337.166

2 2 9.5 2 0.5 19

2 2 2 0.5 4

1 7.5 2.5 0.5 9.375

Excavation in hard soil ordinary

muram or earth mixed with bajri and

kankar or boulder dry or moist &


initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m

including dressing etc. complete.

Cement concrete well mixed in

cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in

position complete including

curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,

Quantity Unit Rate AmountS.

No.Item No. Detail

1 7.5 2.5 0.5 9.375

0

0

32.375 0.91621 cum. 320.10 1586.00 293.28 1453.11

3 2 9.5 1.75 1.5 49.875

2 2 1.75 1.5 10.5

1 7.5 2.5 1.5 28.125

0

88.5 2.50455 cum. 419.80 1503.00 1051.41 3764.34

4 2 6 1.5 3.25 58.5

4 2 1.5 2 24

1 8 2 1 16

9 3

98.5 2.78755 cum. 554.80 1638.00 1546.53 4566.01

5 1 8 3 1 24

0

24 2.2296 Sq.m 105.50 256.00 235.223 570.778

Dry Stone kharanja (15 to 23 cm)

Item 100(A)

Random rubble stone masonary in

cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For

foundation

Random rubble stone masonary in

cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For

superstructure

curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,

HB

6 2 13 1.5 1 39

4 2 1.5 1 12

1 8 1.5 1 12

1 8 1 1 8

71 6.5959 sqm. 67.90 117.00 447.862 771.72

7 2 6 3.25 1 39

4 2 2 1 16 1.4864 sqm.

1 8 1.25 1 10

65 6.0385 sqm. 39.80 48.00 240.332 289.848

4151.81 11753

Rate

Skilled labour 325

Unskilled labour 135

Water A 4151.81

14.87 2007 Amount

87 Labour

Quantity Amount

6.33 2058

Cement plaster including smooth

finishing in cement mortar (1:6) 25

mm thick.

Ruled pointing in cement mortar

(1:3)

Water A 4151.81

B 7601.17

Cement 2 C 11753

Cement 2 250

Total (C+D) 12003

Say 12000

S.

No Rate Amount

1 Sand Cu.m. 380 849.568

2 Stone Agg of 40 mm nominal size Cu.m. 350 288.607

3 Stone Cu.m. 575 3042.96

4 Cement Kg 220 2754.78 12.522 Bag

7058.98

Other 542.183

Total 7601.17

Material

2.235706

0.8

5.3

626.09

Add contingency

Unit Quantity

Material

Total

87 Labour

4152

3Construction of Waste Weir

CROSS SECTION AT A A'

1.5

3.25 '

1 '

2.5

9.0 '

2

1' 6"1' 6"

A A'

2.5

8

PLAN

Estimate of One ha.

Length per ha. = 50 mtr

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length

Width

(TW+BW)

/2 Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Earth work Excavation for making of

bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,

breaking of clods, sorting of grass

pebbles, disposal of excavated

ESTIMATE OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND

pebbles, disposal of excavated

material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead

up to 50 m including dressing and

compaction 119 B 1 50 1.85 1 92.50 Cum 85 7862.5

2 Sowing of seeds on the constructed

bund in three rows

114 3 50 150 meter 0.6 90

3 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman seed @ 4 gm

/ m in three rows

CAZRI

Rate

3 50 0.6 Kg 150 90

8042.5


Total 8283.8

Say 8300.0

Conservation Measure 8100

Production Measure 200

DESIGN OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)

186000010196000685

124003 150

165001510013800

1691000231000022650002070000

654

95140150150

Length of

Head wall

No of Lscd Per Unit Cost Total Cost

7 17800

Head Wall Length = 7 m

Plan Elevation

1.5 7 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount

ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)

0.6

Earth work Excavation in hard

soil up to 1.5 mt Height and

1

2B 1 7.0 1.6 0.3 3.4 92.0 309.1

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 7.0 1.6 0.3 3.4

1 7.0 1.3 0.3 2.7

1 7.0 1.0 0.3 2.1

1 7.0 0.7 0.3 1.5

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

18.3 922.0 16872.6

17314.2

Add 3% Contingency 519.4Total 17833.6

Say 17800

2 Dry stone masonry

21B


deposited excavated material lead

op to 150


Plan Elevation

1.5 6 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6



0.6



1

2B 1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9 92.0 265.0

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9

1 6.0 1.3 0.3 2.3

1 6.0 1.0 0.3 1.8

1 6.0 0.7 0.3 1.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

16.9 922.0 15600.2

15997.7


Say 16500

2 Dry stone masonry

21B



op to 150


Plan Elevation

1.5 5 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6



0.6



1

2B 1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4 92.0 220.8

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4

1 5.0 1.3 0.3 2.0

1 5.0 1.0 0.3 1.5

1 5.0 0.7 0.3 1.1

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

15.5 922.0 14327.9

14681.2


Say 15100

2 Dry stone masonry

21B



op to 150


Plan Elevation

1.5 4 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6



0.6



1

2B 1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9 92.0 176.6

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9

1 4.0 1.3 0.3 1.6

1 4.0 1.0 0.3 1.2

1 4.0 0.7 0.3 0.8

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

14.2 922.0 13055.5

13364.6


Say 13800

2 Dry stone masonry

21B



op to 150


Plan Elevation

1.5 3 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6



0.6



1

2B 1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4

1 3.0 1.3 0.3 1.2

1 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.9

1 3.0 0.7 0.3 0.6

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

12.8 922.0 11783.2

12048.1


Say 12400

2 Dry stone masonry

21B



op to 150

Earthen bund Name of work : Masonry Check Dam I Watershed : Jodhpur XV 16/2

Left 15

Right 15

Maximum cross section Minimum cross section

Top width =Based on seepage line check

Slope of seepage line 5:1

0.6

0.6

US

DS 2:1 1.3 2.5:1

0.8 2:1 0.5 2.5:1

2.6 3.25 1 1.25

0.85 4 1.6

6.45 2.856.45 2.85

CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht

2 2

CS = 3.525 Sq.m. CS = 1.725 Sq.m.


Length 30 m.

Quantity 78.75 Cu.m.

S. no. Name of work Item no. No X Sec Length Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Excavation of earth in dry or moist and


initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m

1.1 In Disintegrated rock 119(c)

1 4.84 13 1 62.89 Cu.m. 134.00 8426.93

2 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick including

supply of stones

124

1 0.8 13 0.21 2.18 Cu.m. 590.00 1288.56

9715.49

Add 3% contingency 291.5Total 10006.9Say 10000.0

MODEL ESTIMATE OF NALLAH BUNDING

CROSS-SECTION OF NALLAH BUNDING

Top width =Based on seepage line checkSlope of seepage line 4:1

0.6 Stone Pitching2 :1

1.5 :1 USDS 1.5

0.90.9

2.25 30.45 3.6 1.8 0.45

5.8510.75 m

CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht2

CS = 4.8375 Sq.m.


V-Ditches Area = 10 ha.

DCB Fencing


Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

V. Ditch 179600 22000 201600.00Plantation 0 494600 494600.00Fencing DCB 0 268100 268100.00

Total 179600 784700 964300.00Say 9.64 Lakh

Silvi Pasture Development

Abstract of Cost

Estimate for V.Ditch in Pasture

Area Length Width Interval No of row Length

Ha mtr mtr mtr mtr

10 1000 100 6 167 16667

Dhaman require on V-ditch =0.002 kg/m 33 Kg

Spacing 5 mtr

Dhaman require between v-ditches =10 kg/ha 100 Kg

0.6

0.3

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty Unit Rate Amount

11 Jungal clearance 107 1 500 50 1 25000 Sqm 1.4 35000

2 Excavation in hard soil or earth

mixed with bajri and kankar or

boulder dry or moist & disposal of

excavated material within initial lead

of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including

dressing etc. complete. 2(B) 0.5 16667 0.60 0.3 1500.00 Cum 92 138000.0

Kg

3 Making of balls of grass seed(1:1:2:2)

1 grass seed :1 FYM : 2 sand : 2 clay 3/1/9

forest 133 133.00

Per 6 kg

material 17 376.8

4 Sowing of balls of grass seed by

dibbling method at 30 cm spacing

3/2/9

forest 133 133

Per 6 kg

material 109 2416.2

5 Cost of seed CAZARI Jodhpur 133 Kg 150 19950

195743.0Add 3% contingency 5872.3

Conservation Measure 179600.0 Total 201615.3

Production Measure 22000.0 Say 201600.0

Plant to pant Spacing 4 m 24 Sqm No of plant 4166.67

Row to row Spacing 6 m Gap filling 20% 833.3333

Available Area 10 Ha Total no of Plants 5000

Item no

Year No./Year

1 Digging of pit( kankar boulder soil) 112 ('C) 1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 67000

2Cost of Plant As per

forest 1 No. 5 5.00 25000

3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 2.7 2.70 13500

4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 1 No. 2.4 4.80 24000

5 Weeding & Hoeing 116 3 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 18000

6Insecticide treatment Market

rate3

0.03 ml 0 Ltr 300 2.70 13500

7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 135000

8 Transportation of water 5 Km 108 3 5 225 /1000Ltr 35.8 8.06 40275

9 Watch & ward Minimum

wages3

12 36 Month 3240 23 116640

10

Transportation of plants from

nursery to planting site

LS

1

1 1 1 1.00 5000

11 Pruning of plants forest bsr 1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 4450

12

Protection of plants from frost / loo

using grass or other locally available

material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m

1 1

1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 17800

TOTAL 480165Contingency 3% 14405

Grand total 494570

Say 494600.0

Model estimate of Plantation Work in Pasture land

QtyDescription

Total

S.No Length Width Height (Amount for

10 ha.)

Rate AmountUnit

0.9 m

Area 10 Ha

Length 1580 mtr

1.2 m

1.5 m 0.3

1.5 m

1.2 m

Estimate of Ditch Cum Bund Fencing

1.2 m

0.9 m

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Layout for DCB 2 1580 1 1 3160.00 Cu.m. 0.70 2212.00

2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist

and disposal of excavated material

within initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5

m

2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 92.00 104659.20

2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 134.00 152438.40

3 Sowing of seed on ridge 114 1 790 1 1 790.00 Rm 0.60 474.00

Cost of seeds LS 5.00 Kg 50.00 250.00

260033.60Add 3% contingency 7801.0

Total 268084.6Say 268100.0

Staggered Contour Trenches

Stone Wall Fencing Area = 10 ha.


Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

Staggered Contour Trenches 117900.072 9000 126900.00Plantation 0 344800 344800.00Stone wall Fencing 0 352700 352700.00

Total 117900.072 706499.928 824400.00Say 8.24 Lakh

Silvi Pasture Development

Abstract of Cost

Particulars Value UnitLength 4 mWidth 0.45 mDepth 0.45 m 4m

No. of trenches per ha 125 no.Dhaman require between SCT =7 kg/ha 60 KgDhaman require on SCT =0.002 kg/m 10 Kg Area = 10.00 ha

S.no Activity Item No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Layout for Trenches 1 5000 5000 meter 0.7 35002 Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5

mt Hight and deposited excavated meterial

Staggered Contour Trenches

Model Estimate

0.45m

mt Hight and deposited excavated meterial

lead op to 50 m

2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 2500 0.45 0.45 506.25 cum. 92 46575

2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 2500 0.45 0.45 506.25 cum. 134 67837.5

Kg

3 Making of balls of grass seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass

seed :1 FYM : 2 sand : 2 clay

3/1/9

forest

70

70

Per 6 kg

material

17 1190

4

Sowing of balls of grass seed by dibbling

method at 30 cm spacing

3/2/9

forest

70

70

Per 6 kg

material

109 7630

123232.5Add 3% contengecy 3696.975

Conservation Measure 117900 126929Production Measure 9000 Say 126900

Estimate of Stone Wall Fencing

0.6 m

Area 10 Ha

Length 1580 mtr

1.2 m

0.8 m

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Stone wall fencing

Random rubble loose

stone fencing

111 1 1580 0.7 1.2 1327.2 Cu.m. 258 342417.6342417.6

Add 3% contingency 10272.5Total 352690.1Say 352700

Available Area = 10 Ha No of plant 2500

No.of Staggered Contour Trenches = 1250 Gap filling 20% 500

Total no of Plants 3000

Item no

Year No./Year

1 Digging of pit( kankar

boulder soil)

112 ('C)

1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 40200

2 Cost of Plant As per

forest 1 No. 5 5.00 15000

3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 2.7 2.70 8100

4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 2 No. 2.4 4.80 14400

5 Weeding & Hoeing 116 3 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 10800

6 Insecticide treatment Market

rate 3 0.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 300 2.70 8100

7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 81000

8 Transportation of water 5

Km

108

3 5 225 /1000Ltr 35.8 8.06 24165

9 Watch & ward Minimum

wages 3 12 36 Month 3240 39 116640

10 Transportation of plants

from nursery to planting

site

LS

1 1 1 1 1.00 3000

S.No Length Width Height

Model estimate of Plantation Work in Pasture land

(Amount for

10 ha.)

Rate AmountUnitQtyDescription

Total

11 Pruning of plants forest bsr1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 2670

12 Protection of plants from

frost / loo using grass or

other locally available

material by making jhonpa

of 0.6 m dia. Of plant

height and covering the

plant. 1 1 1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 10680

TOTAL 334755

Contingency 3% 10043Grand total 344798

Say 344800

Project outcomes

Watershed - Jodhpur XV

(a) Natural resource management

1 Erosion

At beginning After treatment At beginningAfter treatment At beginningAfter treatment

Area ha 1114 312 Area ha 232 22 Area ha 207 38

Sheet erosion Rill erosion Gully erosion

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

At beginningAfter treatment

Sheet erosion

Area ha

Area ha

0

50

100

150

200

250

At beginning After treatment

Rill erosion

Area ha

Area ha

0

50

100

150

200

250

At beginningAfter treatment

Gully erosion

Area ha

Area ha

Project outcomes

(b) Productivity Watershed - Jodhpur XV

At

beginning

After

treatment

At

beginnin

After

treatment

At

beginnin

After

treatment

At

beginning

After

treatment

At

beginning

After

treatment

kg/ha 1800 2100 220 520 400 560 400 600 180 300

Moth sesamumBajara Goar Mung

2000

2500

kg/ha

Bajara At beginning

Bajara After treatment

0

500

1000

1500

2000

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

Goar At beginning

Goar After treatment

Mung At beginning

Mung After treatment

Moth At beginning

Moth After treatment

sesamum At beginning

sesamum After treatment

Project outcomes

(b) Productivity Watershed - Jodhpur XV

At

beginning

After

treatment

At

beginning

After

treatment

At

beginning

After

treatment

At

beginning

After

treatment

kg/ha 3000 3300 24000 28000 1200 1500 165 205

Wheat CuminOnion Mustard

25000

30000

kg/ha

Wheat At beginning

Wheat After treatment

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

At beg

innin

g

Aft

er

treatm

ent

Wheat After treatment

Onion At beginning

Onion After treatment

Mustard At beginning

Mustard After treatment

Cumin At beginning

Cumin After treatment

Project outcomes

(C) Milk Production (C) Average Income Per FamilyWatershed - Jodhpur XV

At beginning After treatment At beginning After treatment

Ltr./ Year 12380 15600 Rs./ Month 2200 5000

IncomeMilk

16000

Ltr./ Year

4500

5000

Rs./ Month

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000


Ltr./ Year

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500


Income

Rs./ Month

For General & OBC Category

Project Contribution

90% 10%

1 Cost of tanka 80000 72000 8000 80000Conservation measure

for water harvesting

60% 40%

2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 10000 6000 4000 10000 Production

3 Barbed Wire Fencing 13900 8340 5560 13900 Production

Total 2+3 23900 14340 9560 23900 Total Cost of tanka unit 103900 86340 17560 103900

No. of Farmers

40 4156000 3453600 702400 4156000

For SC/ST/ BPL

Project Contribution

95% 5%

1Cost of tanka 80000.00 76000 4000 80000

Conservation measure

for water harvesting

80% 20%

2Cost of Horticulture plantation 10000 8000 2000 10000 Production

3 Barbed Wire Fencing 13900 11120 2780 13900 Production

Total 2+3 23900 19120 4780 23900 Total Cost of tanka unit 103900.00 95120.00 8780.00 103900.00

No. of Farmers

20 2078000 1902400 175600 2078000

Total Cost 6234000

1 Conservation Measure 4800000

2 Production Measure 1434000

a From project 956000

b From Contribution 478000

3 Total Contribution 711180.00

Sr. no

Sr. no Name of work

Estimated

cost MeasuresTotal

Estimated

cost Total Measures

Abstract of cost of Tanka with Plantation work

Name of work

VkaWds dh MªkbZx

gSa.M iai

<Ddu 1.5' x 1.5'

2'2'

xkjk dadjhV

1.75

36

flesaUV dadjhV

¼1%2%4½Vkads dk vkxkSj

65'

mDr MªkbZx Ldsy ij ugha

flesaUV dadjhV ¼1%4%8½

6"

13.00

3' 10.5011.5csjÌk iRFkj dh <ksdk

pqukbZ(1:6) 1'3"

eksVkbZ flesaUV dadjhV

¼1%2%4½

1'6" tehu ry 1'6"2' 10.5

Area 0.17 Ha Length 164.9 mtr. Spacing 4 m

Say 165 mtr.

No of post As per length= Length/spacing 41.00

Additional post require after every 10 Posts 4

45.00

Length of Post 7.5 Feet 2.286 m

Width of post 1 Feet 0.3 m

Quantity of one post 0.6858 Sq.m

S.No Description Item no. NoLength of

single wire

Total

lengthKg/mtr Quantity Unit Rate Amount

1 Supply of barbed wire fencing 14

gauge 5 165 825 0.08 66 Kg 46 3036

2 Supply of Jodhpur stone slab for

post 45 30.86 Sq.m 275 8486.78

3 Rehandling of posts to pit LS 45 45.00 No 15 675.00

4 fixing of post in 45 cm. deep pit2B 45 0.45 0.3 0.45 2.73 Cum 92 251.51

5 Cost of binding wire 6 Kg 45 270.00

6 Stretching of barbed wire and fixing

it with the post with thin wire5.5/forest 825 mtr 0.92 759

7 interlacing the barbed wire with

locally available bushy material at a

spacing of 15 cms 5.6/forest 45 45 mtr 5.48 246.6

13478.28


13882.63

Say 13900.0

Model estimate Barbed wire fencing

Model Estimate of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)Amount : 80000.00

Capacity 25740.7224 Ltr.

Dia B H

1 Complete O/O 1 13.00 12.25 Aagor Dia > 36 Feet

2 Hall I/I 1 10.50 11.50 2.50 3.2

5 E/W 1 132.70725 1 10.50 3.00 3.2004

6 Concrete 1 132.70725 1 0.50 4.00 25.74072

7 Masonary 1 36.90675 1.25 11.75 1.00

8 G.L to P.L 1 1.75

9 Aslat Around 2.00 9.00 1 0.5

12 Door 1 1.50 1.50 1

13 Ventilater -2 1 1 1

16 Flooring in side Cement 1 86.54625 1 1

17 Flooring on top Cement 1 132.7073 1 1

Deduction 1 1.5 1.5 1

S.No Details of work No.

Measurements

Loose Soil

Compacted MurrumHard Soil

Soft Rock

DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST

L W Ht/D Feet M Labour Total Labour Total

1 0

0

0

0

0

0

A Loose Soil 1 132.707 1 2.5 331.768 9.39 cum. 75.00 75.00 704.25 704.25

B Hard Soil 1 132.707 1 3 398.122 11.27 cum. 92.00 92.00 1036.84 1036.84

C Compacted Murrum 1 132.707 1 4 530.829 15.02 cum. 134.00 134.00 2012.68 2012.68

D Soft Rock 1 132.707 1 1 132.707 3.75 cum. 178.00 178.00 667.50 667.50

E Loose Soil 1 113.076 1.5 1.5 254.421 7.2 cum. 75.00 75.00 540 540

Extra lift over initial lift

First lift 1 132.707 0.0929 1.5 18.4928 cum. 10.80 10.80 199.7218 199.7218

Second lift 1 132.707 0.0929 0.2 2.4657 cum. 21.60 21.60 53.25914 53.25914

2 1 132.707 1 0.5 66.3536

0

0

0

66.3536 1.87 cum. 320.10 1586.00 598.587 2965.82

3

1 815.23 1 0.5 407.615

1 113.076 1.5 0.5 84.807

492.422 13.94 cum. 232.60 675.00 3242.444 9409.50

Unit RateS.

No.

AmountDetails of work No.

P/L Cement concrete using 40 mm

nominal size agg. in the ratio of

Cem:Sand:Agg 1:4:8 including

compaction and curing etc complete.

Item 11(3)(1)

P/L Gara concrete using 40 mm nominal

size agg. in the ratio of Agg:Gara 1:0.4,

compaction etc complete.

Item 12(1)

Earth work Excavation in hard soil dry or

moist and disposal of excavated meterial

within initial lift of 1.5 mt height and lead

of 50 metre.

Details of measurement Quantity

4 1 36.9068 1.25 11.75 542.068

0

542.068 15.34 cum. 419.80 1503.00 6439.732 23056.02

5 1 113.08 1.5 1 169.614

1 113.08 1.25 2 282.69

452.304 12.80 cum. 419.80 1096.00 5373.44 14028.80

6

2 9 1 0.5 9

9 0.250 cum. 1031.00 3598.00 257.75 899.50

7 1 132.707 1 1 132.707

0

-1 1.5 1.5 1 -2.25

130.457 12.11 sqm. 218.50 609.00 2646.035 7374.99

8 1 132.707 1 1 132.707

-1 1.5 1.5 1 -2.25

130.457 12.11 sqm. 102.30 265.00 1238.853 3209.15

9 1 86.5463 1 1 86.5463

1 113.076 1.25 1 141.345

227.891 21.17 sqm. 79.80 186.00 1689.366 3937.62

10 1 32.9805 1 11.5 379.276

379.276 35.23 sqm. 67.90 117.00 2392.117 4121.91

P/L stone agg. With C:M 1:4, and plaster

of 25 mm thick on stone slab

Item 41(1)

RR stone masonry in Cement sand mortar

1 : 6, including curing

Item 24(1)(1)

Providing and fixing stone lintel / Pat in

cement mortar 1:6

Item 31

RR stone masonry in Gara and stone

Item (21)(1)

Providing and fixing Jodhpur stone slab

and filling the joints with c:m 1:4,

including curing

Item 36(3)

P/L Cement concrete using 12 mm

nominal size agg. in the ratio of

Cem:Sand:Agg 1:2:4 including

compaction and curing etc complete. 50

mm thick

Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand)

25 mm thick, including curing

Item 68(1)

11 1 40.833 1 2.25 91.8743

1 116.965 1 2 233.93

1 109.115 1 2 218.23

544.034 50.54 sqm. 39.80 48.00 2011.492 2425.92

12 1 1.5 1.5 1 2.25

2.25 0.2 sqm. 0.00 LS 100 500.00

13 0

0

0 200 2000

31404.07 79143.48

79143.00

Rate

Skilled labour 325

Unskilled labour 135 Labour A 31404.07

Water Material B 47739.41

Total C 79143.48

900

G Total (C+D) 80043.48

Say 80000

105.40

Quantity

Pointing 1:3 (1 Cement : 3 Sand),

including curing

Item 70(1)

Other works as per requirement

14230

31404

42.83 13919

Providing and fixing Ms sheet door on the

tanka, including all the fittings

Silt Trap, Jali, Hand Pump etc

Amount

3255

Amount

Add for contingency

Material Consumption Statement

S.

No. Rate Amount

1 Sand Cu.m. 380 3421.38



4 Stone Cu.m. 575 16180.5

5 Cement Kg 220 10544.6 210.9 Bag

6 Stone Lintel 15 Cm Thick Cu.m. 2400 600

7 Stone Slab Sq.m. 300 4359.6

8 Door Sq.m. 2500.00 500

9 Gara Cu.m. 80.00 804.48

43516.7

Other 4222.67

47739.4

UnitMaterial

Silt Trap, Jali, Hand Pump etc

9.00

15.62

10.056

2396.5

0.25

14.53

0.200

1.56

28.14

Quantity

TOTAL

Design of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)

Collection of Water = Area * rainfall* 80% Capacity as per Structural design

Catchment Area = ^4*D2

D= 11.70 Cum= ^4*Dt2 * Hight

= 107.46 Sqm Dt= Inner diameter of tanka

Rainfall = 0.3 Mtr Dt= 3.2 3.2004

Hight = 3.20

Collection of water = 25.79 Cum

25.7261 Cum

Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000

= 25790 = 25726.1

Hence rainfall on catchment area can fillup the tanka by water

Production

Total capacity of tanka 25726.1 Ltr

Use of water for drinking purpose 40% 10290.4 Ltr

Available water for plantation 60% 15435.7 Ltr

One watering require 15 Ltr

No. of watering per Year 20 No

Total Ltr require per plant per year 300 Ltr

No of plant can survive = Available water for Plantation/ water require per plant per year

= 51.45

say 50 plant

Area- 0.17 Ha

No. of Plants - 50

Year No./Year

1 Earth work Excavation in hard soil dry

or moist and disposal of excavated

meterial within initial lift of 1.5 mt

height and lead of 50 metre.Digging of

pit

2(B)

1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.22 cum. 92 19.87 993.60

2 Apply of manure

(A) Compost Khad 5.00 kg. 0.4 2.00 100.00

(B) S.S.P. (16%) 1.00 kg. 4 4.00 200.00

(C) Endosulphan (4%) 100 gm 0.10 kg. 30 3.00 150.00

3 Plant cost LS 1 1.00 No 20 20.00 1000.00

4 Planting of plant 113(B) 1.00 No. 3 3.00 150.00

5 Watering of plants (15 litre) 115 3 20 60.00 No. 1.8 108.00 5400.00

6 Making of Thawla atleast 50 cm radius 117(B) 2 1 2.00 No. 1.8 3.60 180.00

7 Weeding & hoeing of plants 45 cm

radius and 15 cm deep

1163

1 3.00 No. 1.2 3.60 180.00

S.

No

Description Item

No.

Total Rate Amount Amount for

50 Plants

Model estimate of Horticulture Plantation in Arable land

Length Width Height Qty Unit

Year No./Year

S.

No

Description Item

No.

Total Rate Amount Amount for

50 Plants

Length Width Height Qty Unit

8 Spray

(A) Endosulphan (35 ec) 3 0.01 Ltr 0.03 Ltr. 280 8.40 420.00

(B) Sulpher 3 0.02 Kg 0.06 200 12.00 600.00

9 Transportation of Plant from Jodhpur 70

km including loading and unloading

LS

1.00 no 2 3.00 150.00

10 Protection of plants from frost / loo

using grass or other locally available

material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m dia.

Of plant height and covering the plant.

Forest

bsr

1 1 1.00 no 3.56 3.56 178.00

TOTAL 187.47 9701.60

Add 3% contingency 291.048Total 9992.65

say 10000.0

S. No. Particulars Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)

1 Wooden Ballies (3 m long) 20 No. 70 1400

2 Wooden Ballies (4 m long) 25 No. 80 2000

3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 Sq. m. 40 5000

4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies and mats 20 Kg 45 900

5 Labour charges for erection of shades 15 No. 135 2025

6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets LS 2000

7 Weighing scale (100 Kg capacity) 1 No. 2500 2500

8 Cow dung 10 Ton 1100 11000

9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 Kg 100 3000

10 Formation of vermi-bed with agro-waste, cow-

dung and worms

20 bed 300 6000

11 Miscellaneous 175

Total Cost 36000

No. of Units 25

Cost for 25 Units 900000

Category No. of Units Contributio

n

Cost from

project

Cost from project

(per unit)

Gen, OBC 20 288000 432000

SC ST 5 36000 144000

Total 25 324000 576000 23040

MODEL ESTIMATE FOR A VERMI-COMPOST UNIT

Returns from Vermi-compost units

Benefits

1 Sale of vermi-compost 250 Ton 4000 1000000

2 Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton 1250 Kg 50 62500

Total 1062500

Net benefit 1062500 - 900000 162500

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - Rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... · detailed project report name of watershed : lavera kalan (jodhpur xv) macro/micro watershed

Documents