-
Inside:2013 ACEC/COEngineering Excellence Awards Winning
Projects - Denver ZooTakes Top Honors
ACEC/CO Reports Findings of EnvisionTM 2.0 Pilot Studies
MEET Denver Zoo’s George Pond
The Ethics of Fracking
ColoradoENGINEERINGQUARTERLY
ACEC/CO Grand Conceptor Award recipients Bill Green, The RMH
Group president(left) with client George Pond, Denver Zoo, Kirsten
Cremona, The RMH Group projectmanager and ACEC/CO Executive
Director Marilen Reimer.
RESPONDING TO THE NEEDS OF OUR INDUSTRY, STATEWIDE.VOLUME 14 –
2012
DECEMBER 2012
-
Engineering Colorado Quarterly is a publication of ACEC/CO on
the issues, people, political and economic environments that are
affecting the industry and ultimately the maintenanceand growth of
Colorado’s infrastructure.
2012/14 BOArD OF DirECtOrS
President Mike Ellsberry, P.E. vice President Greg roush,
P.E.Past President Eric Young, P.E.Secretary-treasurer Peter
Monroe, P.E. national Director william Hoffmann, Jr., P.E.Directors
– Metro Mel Dahlberg, P.E.
Murray McBride, P.E.Duane Jansen, P.E.Elizabeth Stolfus,
P.E.
Director – South John radcliffe, P.E. Director – west John
Sikora, P.E.Director – north Brian robertson, P.E.StAFFExecutive
Director Marilen reimer, CAEAdministrative Assistant van
tranProgram Coordinator Julie Ann DillAccountant Della rosell
Adrienne Dallagiacoma, PR Counsel to ACEC/CO,Editor,
Production/Design, Engineering Colorado Quarterly
President Ellsberry 3On the Issues
From the Executive Director 4
iSi EnvisiontM tool update 5
MEEt: George Pond 6 –8Denver Zoo
ACEC/CO Program update 9
Ethical issues Associated with 10 – 12
Engineers Making news 13Hydraulic Fracturing
COvEr StOrY2013 ACEC/CO EngineeringExcellence Award recap 14 –
23
ACEC/CO800 GrAnt StrEEt, SuitE 100DEnvEr, CO
80203www.ACEC-CO.OrG(303) 832.2200
www.acec-co.org ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 2
MEET Denver Zoo’s George PondThe client of ACEC/CO’s
2013Engineering Excellence Grand ConceptorAward talks about the
project, working withengineers and what it takes to create a
newexperience for Zoo-goers.Page 6
Cover Photo: Ernie Santella, Santella Productions Photo
courtesy: Denver Zoo
-
Mike Ellsberry, P.E.PresidentACEC/CO
2012/[email protected]
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 3
Green Infrastructure
roughout my career as a civil engineer, i have worked on
manyprojects that resulted, at least in part, to a product of
sustainableinfrastructure. e sustainable results were hit and miss
because theprime focus was not specifically on sustainability.
without guidelinesand direction, we got what we got. we have been
aware of the u.S.Green Building Council and the LEED program for
buildings. erewas no equivalent system for horizontal
infrastructure projects.
in 2010, three organizations came together to establish the
institutefor Sustainable infrastructure (iSi). e goal of the
AmericanCouncil of Engineering Companies, the American Society of
CivilEngineers and the American Public works Association was to
developa rating system to examine sustainability over the life of
an infrastruc-ture project. Environmental, economic, and social
factors are thebottom line of sustainability. Envision is the
result of the effort. OnSeptember 1, iSi began accepting
applications for projects to be ratedwith Envision. e rating system
is performance-based and adaptablebased on project size and
complexity, allowing agencies to use it forthe very largest
projects, while allowing its use for smaller projects.e system also
includes an option for self-assessment.
iSi is a non-profit organization tasked with developing
andadministering a sustainability rating system for north
Americaninfrastructure. e iSi mission is to help change how we
think aboutbuilding sustainable infrastructure. iSi found over 900
sustainabilitytools were used around the world. e institute for
Sustainableinfrastructure decided to combine their tools with the
Harvarduniversity Graduate School of Design’s Zofnass Program
forSustainable infrastructure. EnvisiontM is the result of this
collabora-tion. EnvisiontM can be used on any size project. it is
the tool forevaluating and rating the community, environmental and
economicbenefits of all types of infrastructure projects. e rating
systemevaluates, grades, and gives recognition to infrastructure
projects thatuse transformational and collaborative approaches to
assess thesustainability indicators over the course of the
project's life cycle.
President’sView
iSi wanted to develop a multi level rating system that would
workon diverse types of infrastructure projects from utilities to
transporta-tion and water. EnvisiontM differs from LEED as it is
not only basedon criteria but also performance of the project.
Projects can betracked from the planning stage through design,
construction andmaintenance. Envision™ is new and it is expected to
receive a greatdeal of user input. we will learn more about the
skill sets requiredof those best qualified to guide infrastructure
projects to successfullevels of sustainability. Currently, iSi is
offering Provisional Creden-tialing Certificates (Env Pv) for the
period ending December 31,2013, after which re-application and
testing may be required toobtain the Env SP (Sustainability
Professional). Besides creden-tialing, iSi also offers
training.
Here are the requirements from iSi for Env Pv:
• Successful achievement of a four year degree in engineering,
architecture, the sciences or related curriculum;
• Completion of iSi conducted computer-based courses on
Envision™ and its use;
• Successful passage of an online examination on the use of
Envision™ of 75 questions with a successful score of 75%;
• Submission of all applicable fees.
instructions and online application form are available at
http://sustainableinfrastructure.org/.
-
Marilen Reimer, CAEACEC/CO Executive [email protected]
MaintainingMomentum
Coloradoans have been faced with many life-changing events
thissummer – the wildfires, the shooting of Denver police officer
at theCity Park Jazz Festival and the Aurora eater shooting. we
offerour sympathies to all affected by these tragedies and our
thanks toall of the emergency responders and the heroic efforts of
everyoneinvolved. it is times like these that despite our shock and
disgust,we come together to offer support and aid. Partnering with
organ-izations and agencies to offer assistance is an important
directive ofACEC/CO and a reoccurring theme of this issue’s
articles.
Our Southern Colorado Committee sprang into action to offer
ex-pertise and guidance to the communities affected by the
waldoCanyon Fire as you will read on page 7. All those affected by
fire-impacted areas are vulnerable to many emotional roller
coasters andthe technical challenges that follow, such as
mudslides, erosion con-trol and stormwater issues with the pending
monsoons. ACEC/COprovided our members throughout the state with
pertinent informa-tion and protocols to them as they began working
with the affectedcommunities to provide emergency services. not
only is this infor-mation valuable as it applies to natural
disasters, but for engagingman-made emergency situations such as
peer reviews of faulty struc-tures that an agency might
request.
Many large and complex projects are requiring both technical
andfunding innovation in order to get them built. we will be
seeingmore Public-Private Partnerships (P3) formed to deliver
transporta-tion projects for agencies such as CDOt and rtD and
future waterinfrastructure projects. Buck Beltzer, P.E., Esquire
and ACEC/CO’sGeneral Counsel, addresses the challenges consultants
face when sub-mitting proposals in this format on page 5.
Although providing sustainable and cost-effective projects for
theirclients comes naturally to engineers, measurements of
sustainabilityhave been instituted, such as through united States
Green BuildingCouncil’s LEED® program and now by the institute of
Sustainableinfrastructure (iSi). in 2011, the American Council of
EngineeringCompanies (ACEC), in partnership with the American
Society ofCivil Engineers (ASCE) and the American Public works
Association(APwA), formed the new organization. iSi has designed a
new rat-ing tool, Envision™, that is available to public agencies
which willhelp them assess the sustainability features of their
infrastructure proj-ects. ACEC/CO, along with the Colorado chapters
of ASCE andAPwA, have been working with consulting engineering
firms andtheir governmental clients in piloting this new tool. So
far the re-sponse has been favorable and we will be highlighting
case studies infuture issues of our Ezine. On page 9, you will read
more about offersEnvision™ and the trainings offered by iSi.
ACEC/CO is fortunate to work with many strategic partners
thathelp the engineering profession and design and construction
industryto provide decision makers with the information they need
to makethe important decisions necessary to improve our quality of
life. isquarterly Ezine provides insight into our strategic
partner, velmaLane, senior vice president for professional
liability insurance withvangilder insurance Corporation. For many
years, velma has assistedconsulting engineering firms and their
clients in both the public andprivate sectors to provide good
contract language and general businesspractices that benefit all
parties.
Our annual salary survey questionnaire will be out to the
member-ship in mid-August. is valuable tool is used by agencies
such asCDOt in determining fair and reasonable salaries of the
consultingengineering firms that they hire. i strongly encourage
our member-ship to complete the questionnaire – the more firms that
participate,the stronger the data. e survey will be distributed in
October.
By working together, we accomplish what is a win-win for the
public,governmental partners, ACEC/CO member firms and the
industryas a whole.
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 4
-
ACEC Colorado Reports Findings of EnvisionTM 2.0 Pilot
Studies
By Howard Schirmer, Jr. PE, FASCE - President, Transnational
Associates, Inc.
ACEC of Colorado (ACEC), the Colorado Section of AmericanSociety
of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and Colorado Chapter of theAmerican
Public works Association (APwA) combined forces todo an early
testing of the institute for Sustainable infrastructure’s(iSi)
Envision 2.0, a sustainable infrastructure rating system onprojects
in Colorado. the findings have been relayed to iSi forreview and
incorporation in the next version of Envision which isunder
development. Few, if any, projects were evaluated usingEnvision 2.0
at the time of ACEC's work so ACEC's efforts wereuseful and very
much appreciated.
ACEC and APwA made available information gathered from
theirproject award programs. Approximately 35 projects were
evaluatedas possible candidates and four different project types
and sizeswere selected. they were:
woodmen road/Academy Boulevard interchange – ColoradoSprings,
Colorado (transportation project) - Owner/client – Cityof Colorado
Springs; Project designer – urS Corporation
Little’s Creek Drainage improvements - Littleton, Colorado
(stormdrainage project) - Owner/client – City of Littleton and
urbanDrainage and Flood Control District; Project designer –
MullerEngineering Company, inc.
Gold Camp tunnel – teller County, Colorado
(geotechnicalrestoration project) -Owner/client – teller County;
Project de-signer – Shannon & wilson
rio Grande recycle Center – Aspen, Colorado
(environmentalproject) - Owner/client – City of Aspen; Project
designer – Cityof Aspen
interviews with the project designers were held and
numericalscores generated, even though the focus of the pilots was
not onscores but on the scoring and evaluation process.
Difficulties inunderstanding the meaning, intent, and application
of criteria werenoted. Envision 2.0 has 60 criteria that were
rated, if they wereapplicable.
e pilot studies findings were:
• All projects successful in community coordination• High score
correlated to high budget• wide range of scores ranging from 299 to
82 out of
a total possible of 750 points• Complex for small projects• Best
if initiated early in project cycle• Level of achievement
subjective• Procurement constraints• need to show return on
investment• Design engineers willing in all cases to have their
project evaluated
e participant's feedback included:
• Piloting increased sustainability awareness• too much emphasis
on climate change• Some of the elements that required mandatory
inclusion not applicable• Added value of certification
uncertain• use of rating system driven by client • innovative
approaches/material risky for design
professional• useful tool for planning and designing
projects
Forty nine detailed comments and recommendations were made in
the report. if anyone wants a copy of the report, it is
availablethrough the ACEC office..
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 5
-
MeetDenver Zoo’s George Pond
MEET features a strategic partner of ACEC/CO. In this issue
weintroduce you to George Pond, Vice President for Design and
CampusManagement at Denver Zoo. He shares his perspectives on
literally “writingthe book” on sustainable design for animal
environments, working with en-gineers to achieve his vision, and
his passions for architecture and evolvingthe Zoo experience.
ACEC/CO: Tell us about your background – why did you choose
tobecome an architect?
GP: i didn’t always aspire to become an architect. Actually i
went toKenyon College, a liberal arts college, and studied English
Literatureand had a general liberal arts education so i came out
very wellrounded, but not pointed in any one direction. Around that
time,though i really started to identify a desire to be involved in
design,landscape architecture specifically. i didn’t actually
pursue it, though.immediately after graduation i went out into the
workforce and soldoffice supplies for a wholesaler for a while. e
first thing i did iscrack open the company’s catalogue and bought
all the draftingequipment. So that was about the time i decided to
take it seriouslyand figure out what was going on. i then came out
to Colorado forarchitecture school at the university of
Colorado-Denver and endedup with two master’s degrees, one in
architecture and one inlandscape architecture.
ACEC/CO: What led you to working at a zoo and when did you
jointhe Denver Zoo team?
GP: well, interestingly i happened to be at a transition point
shortlyafter getting out of school and doing some work on my own. i
waslooking for work in 2000 and the zoo job came up. ey werelooking
for someone with a blend of design and constructionexperience and
at the time that’s exactly what i had. So i came downand
interviewed with Craig Piper, who is now the zoo’sPresident/CEO,
but is also an architect and zoologist. i was extremelyinterested
in the job. it sounded like a fun job, and it’s also becomean
incredible opportunity for me to be involved in, both
constructionand design in a very dynamic place, with professional
people doingincredible work.
ACEC/CO: How has your work changed/advanced during your
tenure?
GP: when i came to the zoo, the Planning Department was
verysmall and i was personally involved in a lot of on-site
managementwork and served as a liaison to the design functions.
Over time i’vetaken on more and more responsibility and we’ve had
the opportu-nity to do a number of great things. we’ve expanded the
amount ofwork we do in small projects, taking care of design and
constructionfunctions for all of the departments. i think one of
the things i’mmost proud of is how we made sustainability a
functional part ofthe zoo and we really led that in the Planning
Department.
ACEC/CO: When did you begin to focus on new energy and
systemsthat would literally write the book on sustainable design
for animal en-vironments?
GP: Sustainability was not a foreign concept for people at the
zoo,but i think we in the Planning Department really made it a
priorityof all of our design projects and how we were looking at
what wereally could become at the zoo. i started that immediately
and iwould say in 2004 or 2005, when we really started to design
toyotaElephant Passage, is when we started to latch on to even
bigger ideasthat now have become these new energy ideas, like
gasification.
A lot of groundwork for sustainability was already laid when we
as-pired to do something as crazy as create an entirely new
waste-to-energy system that no one’s ever done before. in 2004 we
probablydidn’t realize exactly that we were going to do that, but
we startedto take the bait and say, “Yeah, this would be important
and let’s seeif we can follow it.” we really haven’t stopped. we’ve
just continuedto take steps and build momentum to the point that
what we’redoing now is literally groundbreaking.
Continued on next page.
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 6
-
ACEC/CO: What did you find most compelling in working with eRMH
Group when designing the Toyota Elephant Passage?
GP: i think the most compelling aspect of working with e
rMHGroup was how invigorated and how excited they were aboutworking
not only on a unique animal exhibit, but in working on
thesustainability aspects of that as well. ey came in very excited
andmaintained that level of excitement and professionalism all the
waythrough. it’s probably not surprising that a zoo exhibit is very
com-plicated and has a different set of parameters for an
engineering firmto come into and have to apply their expertise.
Some people orgroups can be taken aback by that, it’s outside of
their comfort zoneand it doesn’t fit within the normal way they
think about applyingtheir engineering skills. e rMH Group
absolutely relished theuniqueness and the oddities that come with
zoo design and theinnovation and excitement of something new like
gasification.
ACEC/CO: Did the work on this project stimulate new thinking
forother areas within Denver Zoo that are targeted for updates or
newdevelopment?
GP: Absolutely. During this project as we started to get into
theseadvanced levels of thinking about sustainability as a function
ofdesign and of operations for what was going to become ten acres
forour institution, we started things like discussing product
procure-ment. right now we’re actively looking at literally
everything thatwe buy, how do we affect our global footprint
through the thingsthat we buy. at’s all a part of this project and
gasification and it’sgoing to change the way that we do things
throughout our zoo. itwas also during this time that we were
inspired to be the first zooever to become iSO-14001 certified,
which is a very rigorous sus-tainability standard. if it wasn’t for
the work we were doing on toyotaElephant Passage we wouldn’t have
attempted to achieve that. at’salso the standard that is applied to
the entire operation of the zoo.So in large measure the effort of
design and thought and executionof sustainability initiatives in
toyota Elephant Passage has changedthe entire zoo.
ACEC/CO: What were the greatest challenges in designing and
buildingthe Toyota Elephant Passage?
GP: ere were so many challenges, but the greatest
challenge,perhaps, is the level of coordination necessary to
consider all theaspects you need to and get them right. How do you
sort out all ofthose things? How do you correlate them and see
where everythingis interconnected and make sure you’re taking care
of them all? atbecomes the greatest challenge. For sure, everyone
as a designconsultant or a contractor or subcontractor or a
stakeholder in thezoo, from some department, is used to looking at
the world withtheir relatively narrow view of what’s important to
them. is is thetype of project that really forced everyone to get
outside of that view,outside of their comfort zone and realize how
many things werelayered up and affecting each other so all of the
participants had tochallenge themselves to put someone else’s shoes
on and understandthe project from another aspect, we have a much
richer and successfulexhibit because of it.
Continued on next page.
“...the effort of design andthought and execution of
sustainability initiatives inToyota Elephant Passage
has changed the entire zoo.”
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 7
-
ACEC/CO: Are there any lessons learned that you can pass along
toother zoo operators that might be considering projects similar in
nature?
GP: i think this was a project where we decided to get very
seriousabout allowing the process of design and construction to get
verymessy, to involve a lot of people, all those stakeholders, and
to makesure we were accountable at a very detailed level to all of
thesegroups. at was not exactly how we used to do it. it’s a way of
de-signing that we’ve been moving up to for 10 or 15 years, but it
reallykind of matured in this project. i would say the biggest
lesson is thatalthough that was very difficult to do and took some
resources andcommunication and caused some headaches, perhaps, we
have amuch better project because of it. So if you’re willing to
get messyin the design process and really stretch to make sure
you’re account-ing for all of the details and all the stakeholders
and really trying toset a bar for all of the different levels of a
project, if you really putin the hard work the outcome can be much
better than expected.
ACEC/CO: How do you see the zoo experience changing in the
future?
GP: i think the biggest thing that toyota Elephant Passage does
forour zoo, and i think this will change zoos all over the world in
thefuture as well, is the rotational aspect. when you come to the
zooyou’re going to have a great experience, but what exactly you’re
goingto see will be somewhat of a surprise. it’s a rotational
exhibit complexwith multiple species that can be around you in
dynamic ways andcan be different from moment to moment, from day to
day, fromweek to week. at means when i visit toyota Elephant
Passage i’mgoing to see something new every time i come. if you
come backtomorrow or next week you’re going to have a great
experience, butit’s going to be a completely different experience.
i think that rightnow as we’re going through our master plan
process that’s exactlythe type of zoo we’re envisioning. it’s not
that i know when i comehere i know i’ll see this on my left and
that on my right. All i knowis i’m going to have a fantastic
experience and i’m going to see an-imals and i’m going to feel
inspired. i think this concept will bepicked up by other zoos and i
think it will change the future of zoos.
ACEC/CO: What are the top three things people may not know
aboutthe Denver Zoo?
GP: at we serve almost two million people a year and are the
mostattended cultural attraction in Colorado. at we work in over
50countries in the world doing conservation work for habitats
andspecies. And that we’re the greenest zoo in the world. i think
thatpeople realize that we’ve done a lot of sustainable things, but
i don’tthink they understand those things put us at a level beyond
anyoneelse out there.
“When you come to the zooyou’re going to have a great
experience, but what exactly you’re going to see
will be somewhat of a surprise.”
George Pond is the Vice President forDesign and Campus
Management atDenver Zoo; he is responsible for oversightand
execution of the zoo's MillenniumMaster Plan, including the
construction of new exhibits and facility improvements,management
of grounds and horticulture,maintenance of all existing facilities,
aswell as the zoo’s sustainable initiatives. Mr. Pond has two
Masters Degrees in Architecture and in Landscape Architec-ture,
both from the University of Coloradoat Denver, and a Bachelor of
Arts in Eng-lish from Kenyon College. George has beenwith the zoo
for eleven years and duringthat time has also served on faculty at
theCollege of Architecture and Planning at the University of
Colorado at Denver as alecturer and senior instructor in
landscapearchitecture, and is an elected City Councilman in Wheat
Ridge, Colorado.
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 8
-
Ethics Program on Fracking,moderated by Former CongressmanBob
Beauprez, tuesday, January 29,2013, 12 noon-5 pm, DoubletreeDenver
tech Center (7801 E. Orchard rd., Greenwood village,CO 80111)
Leadership Succession LifecycleSeminar, wednesday, February
20,2013, 7:30 am - 12 noon, Double-tree Denver tech Center (7801
E.Orchard rd., Greenwood village,CO 80111)
Colorado's Transportation Environmental Conference,sponsored by
ACEC/CO andCDOt on February 27 and 28 at Sheraton DtC (7007 S.
ClintonSt., Greenwood village, CO80112)
Future Leaders Supervisory Skills I, tuesdays 8 am - 12
noonstarting March 5, 2013, PPA EventCenter (2105 Decatur St.,
Denver,CO 80211)
Future Leaders Management Proficiency II, tuesdays 8 am - 12noon
starting March 5, 2013, PPAEvent Center (2105 Decatur St.,Denver,
CO 80211)
ACEC Business of Design Consulting, wednesday, March20-23, 2013,
Hotel Monaco (1717Champa St., Denver, CO 80202)
New ProgramsYou Don’t Want to Miss
February 27-28, 2013
The Sheraton Denver Tech Center 7007 S. Clinton Street,
Greenwood Village, CO 80112
Program -at-a-Glance (subject to revision)
Time Wednesday February 27, 2013
7:15 -8:00 AM
REGISTRATION/BREAKFAST
8:00 - 8:15 AM Welcome
8:15 9:30 AM Keynote Session: Understanding the Environmental
Related Challenges of Alternative Delivery
9:30 10:45 AM Concurrent Breakout Sessions:
Transit (Panel) Project Level Sustainability Implementation
Water Quality Track
10:45 11:00 AM Break
11:00 12:00 Noon Concurrent Breakout Sessions:
Best Practices for Transportation Air Quality and Noise
Water Quality Track
12:00 1:15 PM Lunch- Keynote Session Lessons Learned
Environmental Requirements for Emergency Situations
1:15 2:15 PM Concurrent Breakout Sessions:
Lessons Learned from Recent NEPA and Section 4(f) Court Cases
Beyond HABS/HAER Creative Approaches for Historic Property
Mitigation Water Quality Track
2:15 2:30 PM Break
2:30 3:30 PM Concurrent Breakout Sessions::
What is new in the world of 4(f) and 6(f) Next Steps: The
Evolution of the PEL Process A Panel Discussion Water Quality
Track
3:30 5:30 PM Reception
To register, please click here and/or for additional information
contact Van Tran at 303-832-2200; [email protected]
SAVE DATEthe
February 27th-28th 2013The Sheraton Denver Tech Center
7007 S. Clinton Street Greenwood Village, CO 80112
Sponsored by
For more information go to www.acec-co.org
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 9
-
is year the ACEC/CO’s Expert witness and Ethics Committee has
decided to teamwith ACEC/CO’s Energy Committee to present an ethics
seminar about hydraulicfracturing. without doubt, the process of
hydraulic fracturing has created consider-able media controversy
with respect to oil and gas production activities and
economicdevelopment as compared to community and environmental
impacts extending allthe way to worldwide, geopolitical
implications. For the purpose of this seminar,ACEC/CO will
concentrate on how civil engineers can participate in this activity
inan ethical and responsible manner.
Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking,” as the media prefers to call
it has been around since1949. A relatively new technology called
horizontal drilling uses fracking, which dra-matically increases
the well’s production. is is a fairly new approach to drilling
andproducing oil and gas reserves from “tight” geological
formations such as shale. insimple terms, deep wells are drilled
with long horizontal components in geologicalformations that have
low hydraulic conductivity. ose drill holes are then pressurizedin
order to fracture the rock and inject sand into those fractures
allowing the oil andgas to flow and be recovered by the well.
Modern-day hydraulic fracturing procedureswere established in the
1990’s and have become widespread in the last ten years. Sincethat
time, the amount of oil and gas production in the united States has
increaseddramatically along with the inevitable, alleged negative
health, safety and public wel-fare impacts. Given below are brief
discussions of the most important impacts asso-ciated with the
increased oil and gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing.
Economic Impact
ere are two distinctly different aspects of economic development
associated withhydraulic fracturing; the economic impacts
associated with the process itself, and therelated economic impacts
of having additional supplies of low cost energy. Givenbelow is a
listing of just some of the positive economic impacts associated
with hy-draulic fracturing:
One million new jobs created in the u.S. in the last ten
years.
u.S. domestic oil production has grown by 25% in the last four
years.
u.S. oil imports have dropped from 60% of u.S. needs in 2005 to
40% of u.S. needstoday.
u.S. domestic natural gas production has increased by 40% in the
last five years whilethe cost of natural gas has decreased from
more than $8.00/million btu to less then$3.00/million btu.
Continued on next page.
Ethical Issues Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing
By Dr. Gary S. Brierley ACEC Expert Witness & Ethics
Committee and Kirsten Young, Member ACEC Expert Witness &
Ethics Committee
Last year, the Expert witness and EthicsCommittee expanded its
ethical “horizons” by
sponsoring a seminar featuring ethical consider-
ations associated with large regional projects.
at seminar focused on the broader aspects of
ethical behavior as discussed in the July, 2006
version of ASCE’s Code of Ethics as shown
below:
• Engineers should be committed to improvingthe environment by
adherence to the principlesof sustainable development so as to
enhance thequality of life of the general public.
• Engineers shall hold paramount the safety,health and welfare
of the public and shall striveto comply with the principles of
sustainable de-velopment in the performance of their profes-sional
duties.
• Engineers shall recognize that the lives, safety,health and
welfare of the general public are de-pendent upon engineering
judgments, decisionsand practices incorporated into structures,
ma-chines, products, processes and devices.
• Engineers whose professional judgment isoverruled under
circumstances where the safety,health and welfare of the public are
endangered,or the principles of sustainable development ig-nored,
shall inform their clients or employers ofthe possible
consequences.
Continued on next page.
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 10
-
related economic impacts can be summarized as follows:
Dramatically reduced costs for home heating for households that
have access tonatural gas.
Huge positive impacts on the generation of electricity with the
cost of electricitygenerated with coal as compared to gas dropping
from more than 4¢/kw to less than2¢/kw.
Significant positive impacts on manufacturing and chemical
production activities inthe u.S. numerous chemical and
manufacturing companies have announced plansto open new facilities
here in the u.S. as a result of low cost energy and fuel stocks.ere
are already automobiles powered by natural gas instead of oil
derivatives.Stations selling the natural gas exist in several
areas, one of the most recent being Gree-ley, Colorado.
Although there is no doubt about the positive impacts of
hydraulic fracturing as de-scribed above, these positive impacts do
not exist without potentially negative impactsto the community and
the environment.
Community Impacts
ere are very significant short-term construction impacts
associated with oil and gasexploration and hydraulic fracturing. e
creation of a drill pad site involves roads,pits, storage tanks,
drill rigs, dust, noise, 24-hr construction and drilling
activities, vi-sual impacts, truck traffic, etc. Clearly, anyone
living near one of these sites wouldnot be pleased as a consequence
of those impacts and it would be only natural forthem to expect
and/or to request local and state regulatory relief from these
impacts.when you think about it, civil engineers are in an
excellent position to help minimizeand to manage those impacts to
the mutual benefit of both the oil and gas industryand the
community.
Environmental Impacts
e environmental impacts associated with hydraulic fracturing
seem to revolvearound two primary topics; impacts associated with
the drilling and fracturing processitself, and impacts associated
with global warming. ere have been numerous com-plaints about air
and water quality in the vicinity of drill sites. Fugitive gases
andchemical spills near drill sites have the potential for health
related concerns. in addi-tion, there have been numerous outcries
about the “chemicals” injected into theground during fracturing,
about well bore integrity, about the large quantities of waterthat
are needed for fracturing, and about the water that’s returned to
the surface as aresult of reservoir drainage. All of those issues
create opportunities for the responsibleapplication of civil and
environmental engineering.
with respect to global warming, the environmental lobby was
originally rather positiveabout natural gas as a replacement for
coal, but the sheer volume of gas that is beingproduced seems to
have created some type of backlash. in general, the
environmentallobby is appears to be opposed to all forms of fossil
fuel and is deeply worried thatlow cost fossil energy will hinder
conservation, reduce the desire for “alternative”sources of energy,
and continue to result in global warming. Again, these are
topicswhere civil and environmental engineers can provide rational
input insofar as rationalinput is part of the equation.
Continued on next page.
Clearly, and as discussed during last year’sseminar, it is
extremely difficult and highlycontroversial to actually accomplish
theabove-defined ethical “requirements” forprojects that have
significant regional impacts.How does one, for instance, balance
all of theproject specific impacts for a large regionalproject with
the quality of life impacts for thegeneral public? Or, how does one
balancethe short term community impacts of con-struction with the
long term public benefitsof the completed project.
it is extremely difficult and highly controver-sial to actually
accomplish the above-definedethical “requirements” for projects
that havesignificant regional impacts. During last year’sseminar we
discussed how does one, forinstance, balance all of the project
specificimpacts for a large regional project with thequality of
life impacts for the general public?Or, how does one balance the
short termcommunity impacts of construction withthe long term
public benefits of the completedproject.
ACEC/CO’s Ethics Seminar on Fracking will be another opportunity
to explore theethical considerations engineers need beaware of when
engaged working on oil andgas projects. e program will be held
ontuesday, January 29, 2013 at the DoubletreeHotel DtC from 12 noon
– 5 p.m. Furtherdetails can be found at www.acec-co.org or
bycontacting Julie Ann Dill, at
303-832-2200;[email protected].
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 11
-
ere is an almost constant stream of information, both pro and
con, that is availablein all of the local and national media
outlets. Suffice to say that there is no lack of in-formation about
both the advantages and disadvantages of the continued use of
hy-draulic fracturing here in Colorado. it is also important to
note that this write-up isonly a very brief synopsis of this topic
and that the seminar will feature speakers thatare equipped to
discuss each of these topics in greater detail. in addition the
Expertwitness Ethics Committee has created a website with links to
recently published ar-ticles relevant to the seminar and that
further describe some of the issues discussedabove (LinK.)
ree Closing Items:
As discussed last year, the primary focus of this seminar is not
the process of hydraulicfracturing itself but the ethical
considerations that must be addressed by engineershelping to plan,
design, and construct these projects in a manner that respects
boththe potentially negative impacts caused by the projects as
compared to the eventualpositive economic impact associated with
project completion.
As also occurred last year, ACEC/CO is also pleased to announce
that former Con-gressman Bob Beauprez has agreed to serve as our
moderator for this seminar. Mr.Beauprez is well known and well
respected for his contributions to Colorado.ACEC/CO is pleased to
have him help us with our discussion of the myriad
ethicalconsiderations associated with the constructed
environment.
And as mentioned above, this seminar is being jointly sponsored
by ACEC’s EnergyCommittee. Frank Kohl, a committee member, is a
principal with Lamp, rynearson& Associates, a firm involved in
both the civil engineering and environmental issuesassociated with
oil and gas development. Lamp, rynearson & Associates was
foundedin Omaha, nebraska in 1959 and has additional offices in
Fort Collins, Colorado.
we encourage those who work in the energy industry to attend
this important pro-gram, to be a part of a lively discussion, and
to contribute to the wellbeing of Colorado(no pun intended.) Civil
engineering accomplishments are crucial to economic ex-pansion. is
is an excellent opportunity for us to take a leadership position
onceagain on an important issue that is critical to furthering our
nation’s infrastructureand prosperity.
“...engineers helping toplan, design, and
construct these projects in a manner that respects
both the potentially negative impacts caused
by the projects as compared to the eventualpositive economic
impact
associated with projectcompletion.”
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 12
-
Dale Guillen has joined the RMG EngineersGroup as the project
manager for the centralColorado branch and hired forensic
engineerBarbara Lewis.
Beaudin Ganze Consulting Engineers Inc. hiredmechanical engineer
Jesse Peters and announcedthat Adam Rubin recently passed the
Engineering(Power) Exam to become a Colorado licensedprofessional
engineer.
Gina McAfee joined global design firm HDR asthe environmental
planning program manager forthe firm’s transportation business
group.
Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc. is pleased toannounce Daniel O.
niemela, P.G. as a partner tothe firm.
Mazzetti, Nash, Lipsey Burch promoted PhilGilia and Ron
Bourgault to principals.
MWH Global named Marshall Davert directorof strategic business
growth and promoted PhilipTunnah to vice president.
NewsEngineers Making
Parsons Brinckerhoff named Kara Lents assenior project manager
in its aviation group.
For the second year in a row Debi Bush, ownerof CMIT Solutions
has made Crn Magazine’sannual “women of the Channel” list, a
prominentnational roster of women in the technology industry.
Merrick Co. named Detlef Kurpanek as seniortechnical specialist
and John Kosanovich a proj-ect engineer. John Connelly, PE, has
joined thecivil infrastructure team at the firm as a
projectengineer. e firm opened a washington, D.C.office and Richard
Boehne is named as its SeniorDirector.
KL&A Inc. welcomed Jeff Corson and ChrisTaylor as structural
designers.
Terracon promoted Darren Bruns to seniorassociate.
JVA Inc. hired Mandy Rasmussen as a projectengineer and Robin
Kriss as a design engineer.
Stantec announced the appointment of CharlesJohnson as the
principal in the company’s FortCollins environmental services
practice.
CH2M Hill named Susan Martinovich directorof its north America
Highway/Bridge business.
Submit information about your firmfor this feature to Van Tran
at
[email protected].
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 13
-
FEATURE SECTION
these awards acknowledge the significant role ACEC/CO member
firms represent in creating safe,sustainable infrastructure that
enhances quality of life, in Colorado and across the globe.
EngineeringExcellenceAwards
2013
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 14
-
Toyota Elephant Passage, Denver, COThe RMH Group Grand Conceptor
AwardClient: Denver Zoo, Denver, CO
The ACEC/CO Grand Conceptor Award was presented to The RMH Group
forthe Toyota Elephant Passage project at Denver Zoo. This award is
only givenwhen one project in the entire field receives very high
scores from the judges –
well above the other entries compared to all submittals.
Denver Zoo’s steadfast commitment to sustainability drove the
design team to seek unconventionalsolutions to common challenges
that resulted in systems that met the aggressive sustainability
goals.Additionally the owner and team accepted the challenge of
developing innovative solutions forsystems such as power
generation, heat recovery, daylighting control, and water
reclamation thathelped deliver those goals. Lastly, the owner,
design and construction teams coordination requireddelivery of the
project on time and on budget over a seven-year span that has
virtually no equivalentor precedent. These efforts were critical to
achieving the first-of-its kind LEED Platinum certifica-tion for
the Toyota Elephant Passage.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 15
-
University of Wyoming Visual Arts FacilityLaramie, WYM-E
Engineers Engineering Excellence AwardClient: University of
Wyoming
US 191 Bridge over the Colorado River Bridge, Moab, UTFigg
Bridge Engineers, Inc. Engineering Excellence AwardClient: Utah
Department of Transportation
M-E Engineers, Inc. met the University of Wyoming’schallenge to
design a long-lasting, state of the art facilitythat meets
stringent safety standards and minimizesenvironmental impact and
energy use. Complexmechanical and automatic temperature controls
wererequired to achieve an energy efficient lab building.These
controls optimized the HVAC systems energy usethrough intense
control logic and programming, andwere verified and calibrated
through an elaboratecommissioning process. Mechanical systems
andequipment were gathered in a two-story chase that runsdown the
middle of the building. This arrangementkeeps all mechanical
equipment easily accessible formaintenance without interrupting
users.
The US 191 Bridge over the Colorado River is thegateway to the
Arches National Park and the Canyonlands region. Figg Bridge
Engineers, Inc.’s design featured specialized staining and textures
borneof the earth that blended the bridge seamlessly with its
surroundings, keeping the landscape as the domi-nant vista. The
bridge’s long spans create only oneriver pier, three fewer than the
previous bridge that resulted in a main span of 438 feet – Utah’s
longest concrete span. Staged construction of the twinbridges kept
traffic moving through the corridor,which was important to the
tourism-driven economy,and utilized the footprint of the existing
bridge to preserve the environment. The Utah Department
ofTransportation’s Colorado River Bridge Replacementproject
demonstrates that large-scale highway projectscan reach a
compromise between the needs of thetransportation system and the
needs and desires of thelocal community.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 16
-
Denver Department of Human Services Eastside BuildingDenver,
COMKK Consulting Engineers, Inc. Engineering Excellence
AwardClient: Better Denver Bond Program (Empire Construction
Services, owner’s representative)
Point Bonita Lighthouse Bridge ReplacementSan Francisco, CAHDR
Engineering Engineering Excellence AwardClient: Central Federal
Lands Highway Division of FHWA
Denver Department of Human Services Eastside Facility ispart of
the Better Denver Bond Program. The projectpresented a challenge
for MKK Consulting Engineers tomeet owner’s representative Empire
Construction’s requestto have a net-zero ready facility on a
limited budget. MKKachieved this goal for the client by designing
an innovativesystem that combined a high efficiency energy recovery
variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system from Japan with a pioneering
application of indirect/direct evaporativelycooled under floor air
distribution (UFAD). Throughout the nearly year-long planning and
design phases, the building owner, team architect and design team
consultantsmade all large scale building decisions through an
integrated and collaborative process.
The Point Bonita Lighthouse once guided steamships enroute to
California’s gold. More than 150 years later, thelighthouse still
operates, doubling as a historic attractionat Golden Gate National
Recreational Area. HDRworked closely with Central Federal Lands
Highway Division and the National Park Service to create a saferand
more accessible experience for those visiting this historic site,
which was closed in 2008. The design teamemployed innovative
combinations of unique materials tosuccessfully deliver a bridge to
withstand the harsh marine setting while creating a replacement
structure thatmaintains the look of the existing suspension bridge.
Thebridge is thought to be the only tropical hardwood bridgein the
world to incorporate a Noxyde coating systemwhich extends the life
of the structure. By utilizing the existing bridge deck and
lowering it, this walkway servedas a construction platform as well
as providing the U.S.Coast Guard with 24/7 access they needed
throughout thebridge replacement.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 17
-
I-25 / Alameda Bridge Reconstruction ProjectDenver, COFelsburg
Holt & Ullevig Engineering Excellence AwardClient: Colorado
Department of Transportation
Hartland Dam Fish & Boat Passage FacilitiesDelta,
COMerrick-McLaughlin Whitewater Design Group Engineering Excellence
AwardClient: Painted Sky Resource Conservation & Development
Council, Inc., Delta, CO
CDOT hired FHU to design a new bridge over AlamedaAvenue on
I-25. However, the project faced significantproject complexities:
flooding, a highway below theSouth Platte River, contamination from
adjacent industrial sites, and a constrained footprint. The
challenge was to address these issues in a way that wasmost
resourceful, most cost-effective, and most space efficient. The
result was an innovative and ground-breaking bridge and wall design
that served four functions: support the bridge, retain slopes and
contaminated water, prevent flooding, and pump andtreat stormwater.
The design was completed within six months, allowing CDOT to attain
funding for construction.
Merrick-McLaughlin Whitewater Design Group design involved
removing a vertical drop at an existingdiversion dam and designing
an environmentally sensitive, multi-channel river system to enable
bothfish passage and boat passage. The new state-of-the-art fish
passage facility allows native Colorado endan-gered fish to
negotiate the diversion dam, promotingthe recovery of these
species. The new boat passagechannel provides a safer white water
recreational experience for kayakers and rafters. The project
resultsin positive social, economic, and sustainable
designbenefits. It promotes the recovery of the Colorado native
endangered fish; provides a low-hazard boatpassage; and increases
boating, kayaking, and touristvisits – which helps the economy in
the Delta area.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 18
-
Vista PEAK Preparatory School, Aurora, COCator, Ruma &
Associates, Co. Honor AwardClient: Aurora Public Schools, Aurora,
CO
Repair Consolidated Education & Training Facility, US Air
Force AcademyURS Corporation Honor AwardClient: USAFA 10 CONS/LGC,
CO
Cator, Ruma & Associates’ use of the new
technology,“Displacement Ventilation” (DV) for the ventilation
andair conditioning of buildings provided Aurora PublicSchools’
Vista PEAK Prep school with a proficient, low energy, sustainable
system. Relative to conventional HVACsystems, DV provides more
comfortable interior condi-tions, facilitates the design of a more
pleasant interior architecture, is more energy efficient and
environmentallyresponsible, and provides significantly lower
life-cyclecost. This project was accepted for Xcel Energy’s
EnergyDesign Assistance Program and earned substantial rebatesfor
Aurora Public Schools due to the energy efficient design.
When Air Force Academy personnel noticed cracks inone of the
Consolidated Education and Training Facility(CETF) columns, URS was
called to the site and imme-diately recommended the placement of
temporaryshoring at each of the falling courtyard columns,
whichincluded new courtyard drains and a wearing slab. Additionally
URS’s design used expansion joint bracketsthat employed stainless
steel components more akin tobridges than buildings. The brackets
were designed tobe compact, modular, and anchored with the post
installed anchors, mitigating disturbance to mechanicalsystems and
providing the ability to be installed anywhere along the joint.
Zeroing in on Energy Savings, F.E. Warren AFB, WYMerrick &
Company Honor AwardClient: 90 CES/SECB, F.E. Warren AFB
Merrick & Company used an innovative, high-tech aerial
approach to analyze F.E. Warren’s Air Force Basefacilities to
pinpoint heat loss in building roofs and underground high
temperature hot water (HTHW) distribution pipe network. Merrick
collected scientificmeasurement data by combining various equipment
systems into one aircraft including LiDAR, thermal imagery,
airborne GPS, and an inertial measurementunit. The thermal
signature data was fused with the collected LiDAR point cloud and
then draped onto each 3D building model for further analysis. Data
fusion algorithms dramatically improved scientific results; fusion
of the multiple datasets provided 3D temperature measurements for
each building.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 19
-
Erie North Water Reclamation Facility, Erie, COBurns &
McDonnell Engineering Honor AwardClient: Town of Erie, CO
Jennie Smoly Caruthers Biotechnology Building, Boulder, COCator,
Ruma & Associates, Co. Honor AwardClient: University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO
For the Town of Erie’s North Water Reclamation Facility, Burns
& McDonnell Engineering created a specialized treatment
facility that is both environmentallyand financially responsible.
The design incorporates expandability to address the growing needs
of the community while producing top quality effluent for
reuseirrigation water. The high speed turbo aeration blowers
increase efficiency, while the solids handling system operates the
slow moving parts to reduce electrical energyrequirements and
demand charges. The entire facility wasdesigned with sustainability
in mind by utilizing biologicalnutrient removal processes and
efficient equipment withfeedback loop control. The bio-solids
produced are treatedto a Class A standard, such that they can be
reused by thepublic as a soil amendment.
To promote a sense of community and collaboration,CU Boulder’s
Jennie Smoly Caruthers BiotechnologyBuilding was designed by Cator,
Ruma & Associates to contain specialized laboratory
“neighborhoods”that were arranged around a “main street”
corridor.The design included carefully thought out commonareas such
as lounges, a café, and kitchen to promoteenhanced communication
and interaction among its occupants. In addition, stairs and
corridor widths areoversized so that researchers, scientists and
engineerscan stop and talk without impeding traffic. Spaceswere
also designed to maintain ultimate occupantsafety while reducing
the overall building energy use by over 30%.
Lykins Gulch Stream Restoration, Longmont, COAyres Associates
Honor AwardClient: City of Longmont, CO
Ayres Associates’ Lykins Gulch Stream Restorationproject on the
City of Longmont’s west side involvedrestoring the channel from its
previous flow path,which conveyed stormwater into an irrigation
ditch toa dedicated channel flowing into St. Vrain Creek.
Thecoordination of the entire project included 25
separateagreements with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,the State
Engineers Office, ditch companies, land purchases and other
governmental entities. The cost-saving, innovative design involved
building thechannel through the middle of a private lake requiring
less land acquisition and improved waterquality.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 20
-
U.S. Coast Guard Energy Management Program Support, Denver,
COURS Corporation Merit AwardClient: U.S. Coast Guard
St. Anthony Hospital, Lakewood, COCator, Ruma & Associates,
Co. Merit AwardClient: Centura Health Corporation, Lakewood, CO
URS provided complex data analysis and strategic consultation
that helped the U.S. Coast Guard achievebreakthroughs in
programmatic energy management.URS used web-based software
providing individualizedand unparalleled analysis of energy
consumption asso-ciated with 4,900 utility accounts. For the first
time,advanced metering allowed the agency to closely moni-tor
energy consumption at a building-level coveringover 1,500
locations, including facilities and ship-to-shore electrical
connections. With the aid of URS, nego-tiation of an inaugural
energy procurement contract forthe entire federal sector helped
facilitate the first com-prehensive multi-site utility contract for
the CoastGuard and development of best practices for future
acquisitions.
St. Anthony Hospital was built on redeveloped landacquired from
the General Services Administration on the Denver Federal Center.
With its locationadjacent to the National Water Quality Lab,
Cator,Ruma & Associates, Co. had to provide a special provision
to ensure the indoor air quality of the labwould remain unaffected
by hospital operations andthat the operations wouldn’t affect the
indoor airquality of the hospital. Of primary concern were
thecentral utility plant, the flight patterns and helipad locations
for Flight for Life Colorado.
6th Avenue Light Rail Transit Bridge, Lakewood/Denver, CODavid
Evans & Associates Merit AwardClient: Regional Transportation
District
David Evans & Associates, Inc.’s structural team
collaborated with RTD to provide a 614-foot cutting-edge steel tied
arch bridge that spanned the roadwaywithout the need for supporting
piers in the highwaymedian. By erecting the bridge adjacent to the
site before rolling it across the highway on a large semi-tractor
dolly during a single weekend traffic closure,the team was able to
satisfy project requirements andminimize the need for recurring
lane closures. This approach enabled the construction crews to work
in asafe environment and significantly minimized impactsto
commuters using the 6th Avenue freeway.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 21
-
Devils Lake East End Emergency Outlet, Devils Lake, NDAECOM
Technical Services Merit AwardClient: North Dakota State Water
Commission, Bismark, ND
Sterling Municipal Airport Rehabilitate Runway 15/33, Sterling,
COArmstrong Consultants, Inc. Merit AwardClient: City of Sterling,
CO
In response to several wet years that brought recordlake levels
and an extreme spill risk, the North DakotaState Water Commission
initiated the Devils Lake EastEmergency Outlet project with AECOM
in January2011, with the completion date of June 2012. Due tothe
cost and wintertime constructibility concerns, theelected
alternative was a pump that included a 350 cfspump station with
more than 5 miles of 96-inch trans-mission main, a hydraulic
control structure, and a terminal structure and water quality
filter located at thedischarge. The project team minimized
disruption toagricultural activities of the local landowners and
theirtenant farmers that were vital to the economy of the area.
The City of Sterling, Colorado is the first western region
airport to receive full support, approval andfunding from the
Federal Aviation Administration.The FAA Northwest Mountain Region
successfully in-corporated rubblization technology in a runway
/taxiway rehabilitation project reducing overall construction costs
by 9.76%. Only utilized on statehighways and country road
reconstructions, rubbliza-tion was recommended by Armstrong. This
proved tobe the most suitable application for rehabilitation of the
Portland concrete runway andparallel taxiway pavements because it
saved time,lowered costs and reduced existing concrete into rub-ble
at its current location rather than hauling off-site.
Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall Design, Fort Collins,
COAyres Associates & Anderson Consulting Engineers Merit
AwardClient: City of Fort Collins Storm Water Utility, CO
The Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall project provides flood
mitigation, water quality and habitatimprovements, stream
restoration, and opportunitiesfor outdoor wetland education
activities for FortCollins. The project’s key accomplishment was
floodmitigation for nearly 200 homes and several
roadwaysimmediately upstream of Colorado State University.Despite
its size - five regional storm ponds, 4,500 feetof large-diameter
concrete pipe, and 250 cubic yardsof excavation – the project
earned solid public support.The project reestablished a riparian
stream corridorthrough detention ponds to improve habitat and
waterquality for this tributary to Spring Creek.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 22
-
Arapahoe Road and Parker Road Intersection Final DesignArapahoe
County, CODavid Evans and Associates, Inc. Merit AwardClient:
Colorado Department of Transportation
Mesa Verde National Park Service: Repair Waterline, Mesa Verde
National ParkBriliam Engineering Services, LLC Merit AwardClient:
U.S. National Park Service, CO
David Evans and Associates completed the final designservices on
the critical project to construct a grade-separated interchange at
the junction of State Highway83 and State Highway 88. Based on
previous study recommendations for improving travel times and
publicsafety, Arapahoe County and CDOT worked collabora-tively to
secure funding sources for this interchange thatincludes a loop
ramp, triple-turn lanes and a ring roadto provide access to future
development. Local and stateagencies implemented phases of
construction to provideshort-term traffic benefits. The Interchange
project providesimproved traffic operations and safety, reduction
in traveltimes and accommodates continuing local development.
Briliam Engineering Services provided the design andfield
engineering services for the successful replace-ment of critical
water system infrastructure within theMesa Verde National Park. The
new waterlines improved the public’s well-being providing safe
drink-ing water and the necessary fire flows to protect theparks’
historic structures and natural resources. Reliable water flows
from the Navajo Tank are critical for the fire flow to the Chapin
Mesa Tank Siteand are now delivered by the waterline and
controlvalve system. Sustainable design included low site impact by
using the horizontal directional drillingtechnique, use of
stainless steel pipe, solar poweredelectrically actuated solenoid
valves, supervisory control and data acquisition system
communication devices at the Morefield and Navajo Tank sites.
Meadowlark Subdivision & Transit Oriented Development
Waterline, Westminster, COBurns & McDonnell Engineering Co.,
Inc. Merit AwardClient: City of Westminster, CO
This project used a close Owner/Engineer relationshipto replace
water mains with little or no service interrup-tions to the City of
Westminster’s existing customers inpreparation for the anticipated
light rail system. Burns& McDonnell project team addressed
significant challenges, including the management of
asbestos-concrete water mains crossing of over 100 existing
utilities, tight working conditions and maintainingwater delivery
and fire flow capabilities. The projectwent beyond a simple
waterline replacement project by providing other infrastructure
improvements andaesthetic upgrades not normally associated with
thework, such as curb, gutters and sidewalks.
2013
En
Gin
EEr
inG
EXC
ELLE
nC
E Aw
ArD
S
ENGINEERING COLORADO QUARTERLY 23