Framing Sympathies A Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street By Coen Berkhout (s2205815) University of Groningen Professor: D.U. Shim DECLARATION BY CANDIDATE I hereby declare that this thesis, “ Framing Sympathies: A Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street“, is my own work and my own effort and that it has not been accepted anywhere else for the award of any other degree or diploma. Where sources of information have been used, they have been acknowledged. Name: Coen Berkhout Signature: C.B. Date: May 18, 2015 1
38
Embed
Framing Sympathies: A Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
DECLARATION BY CANDIDATE
I hereby declare that this thesis, “ Framing Sympathies: A Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall
Street“, is my own work and my own effort and that it has not been accepted anywhere else for the
award of any other degree or diploma. Where sources of information have been used, they have
been acknowledged.
Name: Coen Berkhout
Signature: C.B.
Date: May 18, 2015
1
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Framing Sympathies:
A Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
Coen Berkhout
Abstract:
Like memorable speeches, iconic visuals have the power to transcend time and place, and embody
a certain sentiment. But where speeches are hard to use in unison for international groups, the
power of an icon increases greatly as it is reproduced and re-viewed while not being bound by the
barrier of language. As the mask of Guy Fawkes evokes a sentiment of anarchism, certain pictures
of Occupy Wall Street ooze a sentiment of empowerment, of standing together against
authoritarianism. This article identifies the ways in which visual icons impact the sociopolitical
landscape, and through that shape global politics. The image of the Pepper Spraying Cop puts the
issue of police brutality in a sharable frame and through this the discussion on the role of the police
resurfaces in various regions around the world. The concept of the visual icon is defined, and a
three-step methodological approach is applied to the icon to find that the concepts of 'the national'
and 'the international' are not as rigid and clear-cut as they may seem. Regional appropriations, an
internet meme and inter-iconicity causes a seemingly regional icon to have a large impact on the
global sociopolitical landscape.
2
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Table of contents
Introduction p. 4
Building the international icon p. 10
Shaping the sociopolitical landscape through international icons p. 12
Empirics: a methodology to assess the impact and internationality of the visual icon p. 16
Case study: OWS and the Pepper Spraying Cop p. 17
Conclusion p. 30
References p. 33
3
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Introduction
A widely accepted view on social -protest- movements is that they play an important role in
the workings of the modern globalized state. (Prechel 2006) The ability for citizens to rally together
in a large group of like-minded individuals and stand for a social or political interest has shaped
decision making in almost every modern state around the world. This effect was observed in the
Arab Spring, the 2013 Bulgarian protests against the first Borisov Cabinet, and the Indian anti-
corruption movement of 2011. What defines these movements in a positive way is that they can be
seen as the 'vanguard' of society, they are leading the way to new possibilities on issues that are
considered to be 'cutting-edge' or issues that are of seemingly little concern to the general public.
Yet at the same time social movements only seem to reflect concerns or patterns that have been
boiling within-, or even dominating the society in which the movement arises. (Coy 2013, 9) And in
addition to this social movements tend to reflect very local or regional interests of society, and
rarely mount into a global movement that spurs people of all regions around the world. This is what
makes the Occupy Movement an interesting phenomenon to study in the field of International
Relations. As Occupy Wall Street went global on October 15, 2011 -28 days after the initial protests
in Zuccotti Park, NYC- with protests going on in 951 cities across 82 countries in all regions of the
world. (Thompson 2011) It became clear that this movement was unique in it's scope and ideals to
attract support from such a large amount of people from all over the globe.
4
Illustration 1: An Infographic Map by newspaper The Guardian (UK) showing Occupy protests around the globe
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
In the aftermath of the protests journalists, policymakers and academics have fallen over each other
to identify the roots of the movement, and how it shaped political decision making on the issues the
movement raised. To give examples of this, in an article by the Financial Times it mentioned how
the issues of taxation, finance and corporate governance resurfaced in the debate on U.S. policy
thanks to Occupy Wall Street (OWS). (Financial Times 2011) In “The Politics of the ‘Global’,”
Meghana Nayak, examines discourses about OWS’s 'global' connections, such as the “Arab Spring”
and the 15M Indignados uprising in Spain. She argues that OWS is a site for competing discourses
that can potentially reinforce or challenge global power politics. As such, she asserts that it is not
just the actions of OWS participants but also the way both supporters and detractors of OWS make
meaning about or interpret OWS that can have effects on the possibilities of global solidarity.
(Nayak 2013) And Alasdair Roberts wrote how the path dependency of social change caused the
Occupy Movement to fail. (Roberts 2012)
What all these publications have in common is their focus on the organisational structure of
the movement, and the (sociopolitical) ideology the protesters represent. This leads me to believe
that what the current academic analysis of the Occupy Movement lacks is an analysis of the visual
dimension of the movement. In this paper I will aim to discover the impact of important visual icons
created during the occupy movement. Stephen Saunders makes a case for the importance of the
icons from OWS in his article “The Mask of Guy Fawkes”:
“That image captured the imagination of the graphic artists and filmmakers who created “V for Vendetta.” “V”
wears Guy’s mask. He, and it, became the avatar of Anonymous, the hackers who called on masked “redeemers, rebels,
and radicals” to “occupy” Wall Street. So Guy Fawkes has reemerged, a reminder that anti-popery has always been
imbued with class warfare. The mask of Guy Fawkes evokes anarchism.”
With this passage Saunders signifies the power of the visual icon. Like memorable speeches,
iconic visuals have the power to transcend time and place, and embody a certain sentiment. But
where speeches are hard to use in unison for international groups, the power of an icon increases
greatly as it is reproduced and re-viewed while not being bound by the barrier of language. Like the
mask of Guy Fawkes evoking a sentiment of anarchism, certain pictures of OWS ooze a sentiment
of empowerment, of standing together against authoritarianism.
5
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
When keeping this in mind, a seemingly logical next step is to further analyze the impact of
the Guy Fawkes' Mask as the visual icon of OWS. It did after all become, quite literally, the face of
the protest movement, a uniting image that binded the protesters in anonymity and ideology. The
power of the icon for the movement itself is undeniable, yet I am curious to see how the visual
dimension of OWS impacted the minds of the citizens around the world. To do this, perhaps it is
better to look at an icon that spoke of something greater, that is to say an icon that ignited political
discussion in the various nations it circulated, that caused new protests or empowered protests
abroad.
It is important to notice that in the wake of OWS, subsequent protests have adopted the
terminology and style of the afore mentioned movement, changing the way we view and think about
protests movements and impacting our ideas about society and politics. (Van Gelder 2011) This is
seen in the Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong, which started with students boycotting classes, and
eventually joining together in what was known as Occupy Central – 'central' refers to the area that is
at the heart of the financial district – to demand a genuine election of the Chief Executive of the
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in 2017. The Hong Kong occupation started in
September 2014, almost three years after the very first protests in New York. (Chan 2014, 574-575)
In May 2013, the protests known as the Blockupy Movement started in Frankfurt, a year after
twenty-thousand protestors took part in a similar protests, to voice their anger over the austerity
measures that the euro-zone leaders decided on after the European Debt Crisis. (Spiegel Online
2013) And in his book The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #Occupygezi Umut Özkirimli
makes it clear that the protests in Istanbul are not so much a 'Turkish Spring', but a new, standalone
protest inspired by fresh sentiments in Turkish society to stand up against the classic neoliberal
ideology and authoritarianism. (Özkırımlı 2014) Yet in his discussion of the movement he signifies
characteristics that can directly be found in the 'Declaration of the Occupation of New York City',
approved by the Zucotti Park General Assembly on September 29, 2011, such as sexual orientation,
privacy and students. (Nycga.net 2011)
I believe it is safe to say that the OWS protests changed something in the minds of the
people around the globe, if one looks at the reactionary protests that were ignited in its wake. Yet
6
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
what remains to be seen is why the movement had such an impact. Perhaps its impact lies not in its
demands, as some seem to think (Kang 2013, 59-62), nor is it the moment in time in which the
movement happened (Adams 2014) that has had the most impact. The greatest asset of OWS was in
the response of the authorities to the movement, and in particular the way in which photographs and
pictures of this were circulated around the world, showing every citizen what is looks like to stand
up against authorities, and be beaten down as a result. Street photographer V.C. Ferry writes in his
photo essay for the Huffington Post -which went viral on Twitter in May 2012- that:
“Yet, despite the virtues of the movement, the sheer level of opposition from authorities on local, state and federal levels
has surprised me in covering OWS. Numerous times, I have witnessed unnecessary violence towards those peacefully protesting
under the pretext of "protecting and serving," leaving me to wonder just exactly who is being "protected and served". (…) I hope my
photographs inspire you to question what is important to you in regards to the way our society is run and what you are willing to do
to achieve it.”
Taking a look at some of the photographs -below- he published, it becomes clear that his
portrayal of the movement can have a lasting impact on ones beliefs about its origin and demands of
OWS, and perhaps invoke sympathies for its cause.
7
Illustration 2: Occupy Wall Street protesters during a dance and music activity. Copyright: Vrindavan Ferry
Illustration 3: Police officers while watching the protesters at Zuccotti Park. Copyright: Vrindavan Ferry
Illustration 5: An OWS protester writing aletter to his wife. Copyright: Vrindavan Ferry
Illustration 4: A mother and her daughter visiting the OWS campment. Copyright: Vrindavan Ferry
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
The impact of OWS is increased when one combines these pictures with images of police
officers pepper-spraying seemingly harmless protesters, and a report by researchers at the law
schools of NYU and Fordham that accused the NYPD of unnecessary aggressive force, obstructing
press freedom and making arbitrary and baseless arrests. (Knuckley, Glenn and Maclean 2012) It
becomes clear that the visual dimension of OWS can be seen as having a large impact on the
sociopolitical landscape around the world.
When I look at the various images produced by the coverage of the Occupy protests, and I
ask myself the question: “Of what is this an instance?”, I find that the Guy Fawkes' Mask icon
speaks solidarity with the protest, with the people, more-so than a political demand or issue. Yet
when I see the various pictures of protesters being pepper sprayed by police, or getting bombarded
with tear-gas, there is a profound image of what is commonly perceived as police brutality. This
larger issue transcends the scope of the local protest and speaks to a greater discussion. This is why
the aim of my empirical research is to find the impact of this visual dimension, the particularity of
the icon of police brutality, on the sociopolitical landscape around the world. To do this I will take a
look at the image of The Pepper Spraying Cop that circulated in the United States media a couple of
months after the initial protests and which provoked a discussion on the role of the police security
-on University campuses-. (Kennicott 2011)
Besides proving the impact of the visual icons of OWS on the sociopolitical landscape
around the world, the aim of this article is to situate the study of 'the visual icon' within the field of
International Relations. The coverage of Occupy Wall Street shows -again- that images are
communicative, able to convey sentiments and impact international society. (Campbell 2003, 57)
And where studies in the field of Sociology and Visual culture have developed a vast debate on the
definition and role of the visual icon as a research subject, such as the book No Caption Needed by
Hariman and Lucaites, this has been limited in the field of IR. Michael J. Shapiro (1988) and Gillian
Rose (2001/2012) have made good contributions to the debate about images -or the visual in
general- in international relations, but neither have written about the specificity of icons and their
impact on international politics. That is where this paper tries to make a contribution: to define the
icon and its impact on international relations, thus supporting an international dimension of the
8
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
icon.1
Going from there this paper will first conceptualize the international icon, building on
literature from outside International Relations research. Then it aims to discern the impact of the
international icon on international society, and through this on the sociopolitical landscape around
the world. After that it will lay out an empirical methodology -based on Lene Hansen's research- to
analyze the impact of a specific icon. And finally this method will be used on a case study of the
iconic image of The Pepper Spraying Cop, to question -specifically- what the impact of the Occupy
Wall Street Movement's visual dimension is on the sociopolitical landscape around the world.
1 To the question of the importance of the international dimension of the icon, Lene Hansen writes: “These international dimensions fall in three parts. First, some icons gain recognition and generate responses across state borders (…) Second, to theorise the icon as international is to ask how ‘the international’ itself becomes constituted as a particular space separate from ‘the national’. Third, it is to theorise icons as inherently contested and always invoking national and international ‘wes’ [plural].” (Hansen 2014, 267)
9
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Building the international icon
Aside from company logos, religious symbols, and famous humans, the word 'icon' -in
academic research- refers to widely circulated, photographic images. (Brink 2000, 137) For the
purpose of this paper, the definition of the international icon will build on the last mentioned
category. This is not to say that company logo's -and in particular appropriations thereof- were not
relevant in most protest movements, or that religious symbols do not have an international political
impact. I adopt this 'narrow' definition on the basis that photographs of the OWS movement are a
distinct phenomenon that impacts on international politics and society in such a way that sets them
apart from logos and symbols. In this paper I will adopt the definition by Robert Hariman and John
Louis Lucaites of the icon as:
“iconic images [are] those photographic images appearing in print, electronic, or digital media that are widely
recognized and remembered, are understood to be representations of historically significant events, activate strong
emotional identification or response, and are reproduced across a range of media, genres, or topics.”
A broader definition can be found in the works of Jeffrey C. Alexander, who combines
various definitions of the icon in the field of sociology. (Alexander, Bartmanski and Giesen 2012)
While David Perlmutter considers a more narrow definition of the 'hyper-icons', which takes into
account the speed of circulation of the icon. (Perlmutter 2006) However for the purpose of my
research question, I will use the former definition of the icon. As might be deduced from the
definition by Hariman and Lucaites, they focus on photographic icons and more specifically
photojournalistic photographs. While many amateur photographs of OWS have had a wide
circulation, they lack the emotional effect that the photojournalistic images of the protests evoke,
therefore I choose to focus on the photojournalistic icon in my research. It should however be noted
that the lines between photojournalism and 'citizen journalism' are becoming increasingly blurred,
(Mortensen 2011, 7) especially as international newspapers start publish the work of street
photographers to support their articles.2
2 This photo-essay in The Guardian uses photos made my press photographers together with pictures by independent street photographers to report on the Blockupy Frankfurt protests. http://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2015/mar/18/blockupy-anti-ecb-protest-in-frankfurt-in-pictures
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
I must acknowledge the power of icons in other visual media, such as comics, and their
impact on international society. This was evident not only with the OWS movement and the drawn
appropriation of the 2008 'Hope' poster depicting and almost Che-esque Obama -see below-, but
also in the paintings of most anti-war protests. (Craven 2009, 644)
When narrowing down the photographic icon, a distinction can be made between a chronic
'generic' icon, and a singular 'discrete' icon. The former categorization sees the icon as describing
different images, but which all share the same elements to make it representative of an event; like a
visual cliché. The latter refers to a single image with a definitive set of elements –the famous photo,
or footage- like the Tiananmen Square photograph. (Perlmutter 1998, 11) In this paper I will use the
definition of the generic icon, because there are cases of photographs that comply with our general
definition of the event even if one particular image cannot be picked out as ‘the’ iconic
representation. (Hansen 2014, 269) The coverage of OWS is a case where such images are found. It
is not, as we will see later, once specific icon that came to represent the OWS protests, but rather a
similar combination of elements that was found in the most circulated ('viral') photographs that
covered the event. The concept of elements of one icon returning in other widely circulated images
is that of the visual appropriation. The appropriations of an icon are instrumental in giving the icon
its international impact, particularly when the icon is considerably 'regional' in its compositional
elements. In addition, the generic icon gains social impact because it can refer to other, older icons.
In the case of OWS, an iconic image might refer to an icon that represents the events of a previous
protest, and through that evoke more sentiments on behalf of the current protesters. This effect can
be described as 'inter-iconicity'. (Mortensen 2011, 13)
11
Illustration 6: Appropriation of the 2008 Obama 'HOPE'poster
Illustration 7: Artist: Shepard Fairey
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Shaping the sociopolitical landscape through international icons
Having defined the concept of the visual icon, it is important to add the international
dimension to make it relevant as an object of research in the field of International Relations. It is too
simplistic to say that the international dimension of the icon is created when an icon complies with
the criteria in the last section, but does so on an international level. The international system has
clear regional devisions, (Farrell, Hettne and Langenhove 2005) and it is possible that an icon might
find circulation in a certain region, like the European continent, while being virtually ignored in
others. An example of this would be the photograph(s) of Bosnian prisoners from 1992, which was
circulated heavily in Europe and North America, but not so much in other parts of the world. Thus,
for an icon to be truly 'international', perhaps it is better to speak of it as a 'global' icon.
When trying to find the impact of an icon on the sociopolitical landscape around the world,
it is important to confirm that an icon is truly 'global. However, this is also wherein the difficulty of
this approach lies. Because it is already difficult to confirm if people are aware of the importance of
images, even within a domestic context. (Perlmutter 2005, 9-11) This becomes even more difficult
when looking at a global scale. In the case of OWS, a report by Ipsos for Reuters News found that
global citizens across 23 countries were “in the dark about, but sympathetic with OWS”. (Thomson
Reuters 2011) What this means is hard to say, is it enough that four out of ten global citizens are
aware of the Occupy protests? And if not, how many should have seen the coverage -the icons- of
the event for it to be considered 'global'?
Another critical question comes from research into the CNN-effect; have new media
technologies created a 'political realm' that goes beyond states borders? Piers Robinson argues that
the basic structures of language and nationality keep citizens reliant on domestic -news- media,
(Robinson 2011, 9) but on the other side of the debate there is the notion that eventually the power
will shift away from states towards more -international- non-governmental actors. (Livingston 2011,
27-28) The categorization of the internationality of the icon based on political regions works with
the established concept of political regions. Yet when that concept loses power, as it seems to do
with the current increase of global communities and international -non-governmental- media
producers, so does its merit as a category.
12
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Perhaps a better way to define the internationality of the icon is how the icon situates itself
in the discourse of the international. Does the site of the audiencing of the image promote certain
sentiments or concepts of 'internationality'? (Rose 2001, 24-28) This relates to the questions of who
or what -in the image- are the subjects, enemies, threats, opportunities, and with which character
they are represented. (Hansen 2006) For example, in the iconic image “Saigon Execution”, who is
seen as the enemy? The Vietcong soldier, bound and shot in the head, or the armed South
Vietnamese general? These questions of 'us' against 'them', 'inside' against 'outside' are what binds
people internationally, and can give icons an international dimension.
When looking at OWS, this is where the international dimension of the icons becomes very
clear. In most of the pictures there seems to be a large variety in ethnicity, gender and generation
between the protesters, yet they all seem to unite under a common cause -We are the 99%!- or
against a common enemy -the police forces on the other side of the proverbial fence-. The question
of who 'you' are in this situation becomes very clear and makes it easy to sympathize with the
protesters no matter where you are, or who you are in the world.
In the introduction I pointed out that the initial OWS protests ignited other protests around
the world, even years after the movement itself had vanished. For me this must mean that icons
have a manner of political impact, or effect if you will. But how can we find this impact? The first
question we should ask is if images themselves can cause political action, or if images need text to
activate people to take political action. Visual theorist W.J.T. Mitchell claims that images
themselves are inherently cryptic and always in need of text to 'frame' the picture. (Mitchell 1986)
However, in extreme cases, a depiction of violence can evoke a feeling that 'something needs to be
done', think of the image of the burning towers on September 11. At the same time, this mere
feeling that action has to be taken needs to be directed somewhere, and that direction is provided by
the text that accompanies the image. (M öller 2007) Is this any different for icons? As discussed, an
icon is an image that provokes a strong emotional reaction, but then it is still merely a -somewhat-
bigger sign that still does not point in any particular direction. Assuming this, even icons need
context to spur people into action, and thus icons can be framed in such a way that they cause action
in the desired direction, perhaps one icon can cause opposite reactions, depending on the contextual
discourse.
13
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Establishing that icons need contextual discourse to cause political action, this brings us
back to the question of the CNN-effect: can images, as broadcast by media, change foreign policy?
Robinson established in his research that two factors impact the ability of media to influence
policymaking on an issue: the level of political elite-consensus and where an issue falls in terms of
high-low politics. (Robinson 2002, 6) The more dispersed the political elite is, the higher the chance
that the media will influence descisionmaking. At the same time, when an issue is considered to be
high politics, the influence of the media is diminished. Given that most icons relate directly to
questions of national security, with predominant types of icons being of war or international crises,
it seems that there is little room for icons to influence foreign policy. (Hansen 2014, 274-275) In the
case of OWS, the protests shifted the political discourse from questions of government spending
and economics to questions about the economic system and inequality. (Mitchell, Harcourt and
Taussig 2013, 98) But other than that, it did not seem to impact actual descisionmaking in the
United States, perhaps because the elite-consensus was fairly united in the view that capitalism was
the correct economic system.
If visual icons can not influence policimaking directly through causing political
descisionmaking, perhaps they can influence the public opinion to such an extent that it impact
electoral politics. In 2012, in the United States, the voice of OWS became so strong that it certainly
impacted the electoral debate, prompting Obama to address the movement in New Hampshire:
“A lot of the folks who’ve been down in New York and all across the country in the Occupy movement, there
is a profound sense of frustration, a profound sense of frustration about the fact that the essence of the American Dream
… feels like it’s slipping away … Families like yours, young people like the ones here today—including the ones who
were just chanting at me—you’re the reason that I ran for office in the first place.”
Aside from directly influencing electoral politics, icons can enter into the political debate,
forcing politicians to deal with the implications of the icon. A characteristic of icons, and
particularly a generic icon, lies in the inter-iconicity. Icons stay around for a long time, surfacing
again when a relevant appropriation comes to light, and thus icons influence political discourse in
the long run.
14
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Before moving to the case study of the icons of OWS, I will discuss the role of
appropriations -images that build on an existing image to reinforce it- and how they contribute to
the impact of visual icons. According to Campbell, images have the inherent ability to “help build
or reinforce a moral position.” (Campbell 2003, 72) And as discussed, the way in which a picture is
discursively framed or in which format it is presented can change the way in which we act upon an
image. (Butler 2007, 142) It is partly thanks to appropriations that the sentiment of an icon stays in
the minds of the public, and this gives visual icons a greater chance to impact politics or public
opinion. (Hariman and Lucaites 2007, 203) Lene Hansen identifies two types of appropriations in
her paper: one is where the icon is copied, but where new elements are added or certain elements
are left out of the new image. And the second one is where the scene of an icon is adopted into a
different format of delivery, such as a comic being made of a photographic icon. (Hansen 2014,
276) I would add to this a third category of appropriation, one wherein the essential element of the
icon is placed in a different setting seemingly unrelated to the original icon. An example of this are
the internet memes that are created of iconic photographic characters placed in other famous
pictures.
When studying the effect of appropriations we can apply a three-step approach: first, as with
the original icon, the impact of an appropriation is reliant on the textual discourse that conducts it.
Second, wether or not the appropriation causes a critical intervention -impacting the way we view
the original icon-. And third if there have been appropriations that contradict the original effects of
the icon, or if there are no appropriations while we would expect them to be there. (Ibid, 276-277)
15
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Empirics: a methodology to assess the impact and internationality of the visual icon
Above I have discussed the concept of the visual icon, its international character, and its impact on a
theoretical level. Based on this I will adopt a three-tiered methodology to empirically assess the
impact of the OWS icon on the sociopolitical landscape around the world.
In step 1 I will look at the site of the iconic image itself.
• What is the composition of the image, what do I actually see?
• What 'facts' does the image convey, can I speak of “seeing is believing”?
• What inter-iconicity can I observe with this icon?3
Step 2 concerns the international status and sociopolitical impact of the icon.
• What power structure is visible in the image through inclusion and exclusion?(Shim 2014)
• What is the impact of the contextual discourse surrounding the image?
• What societal impact has the image made in various regions around the world?
Step 3 deals with the appropriations of the icon.
• What is the range of appropriations in terms of media formats and geographical location?
• To what extent have these appropriations achieved iconic status within their region?
• Which appropriations made a critical intervention and in what way?
3 Unlike Lene Hansen's method, who applies it to a discrete icon, I am looking at generic icons, and therefore I will not concern myself with the question why this picture rose to iconic status over the other images that may exist.
16
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Case study: OWS and the 'pepper spraying cop'
In the last part of the paper I will apply the methodological framework I built on one of the
iconic images of the Occupy Wall Street movement: the pepper spraying cop. I chose this image
because it is one of the more controversial iconic images of the OWS movement, which caused a
large response in the community. In my introduction I already mentioned the particularity of this
icon. It is unlike the icons that have dominated visual icons research because it does not clearly
communicate an international event. However, the discourse in the media surrounding this picture is
that this is undoubtedly the most iconic image from the United States Occupy protests. And when
we look at the appropriations later, we will see that through them the elements of police brutality
depicted in this image impacted the sociopolitical landscape in various regions. This makes the
image a 'unique' icon in a way that it only becomes an impactful icon through its appropriations.
17
Illustration 8: LT. JOHN PIKE with the University of California, Davis police department pepper sprays a line of Occupy Wall Street protestors at the campus on Nov. 18.Photo: Louise Macabitas
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Step 1: The iconic image itself
The image of Lieutenant John Pike pepper spraying a group of OWS protestors at point
blank range is different to the other images of the OWS movement. It does not depict the protesters
as a large group that intrusively occupy a public space, nor does it depict the protesters as having a
common goal. When only looking at the image, this could be a depiction of any instance of police
brutality. The people sitting on the ground seem defenseless against the imposing structure of the
police lieutenant using the pepper spray against them. The image is very busy, not pleasing to the
eye, yet the essential compositional elements are very clear: the victims and the cop are at the center
of the image, and seem the center attention for the people who are standing by the scenario. In
regards to the bystanders: most seem to be filming the scenario, as if it is of great importance, or
otherwise seem to react shocked. Perhaps the image is a still from a movie that was made of the
scenario, but the quality of the image makes it seem like it is not.
The question of what factual meaning is attributed to the image seems easy to ascertain. We
see a police officer who used his pepper spray against a group of defenseless students while his
colleagues keep the bystanders at bay. If we follow the idea of 'seeing is believing' then we can
expect a large outcry against this police brutality, which is exactly what happened in the days
following the circulation of this image. Many media referred back to the 1963 Birmingham protests
and the “Bull Connor” moment, during which the Birmingham police chief used attack dogs and
fire hoses against the children of the protesters against racial segregation. 4 Subsequently the footage
of this became an icon of police brutality, and the fact that media now refer back to it speaks for the
impact the picture has, as it provokes a reaction of such magnitude.
This brings me to the question of inter-iconicity, the pepper spraying cop invokes the
sentiment of different icons of different protests. One of these is the photograph from 1963 of
protesters being sprayed by a water-hose -seen below-. What connects these icons is the apparent
sentiment that the protesters are defenseless against the seemingly unnecessary force used by the
4 For footage of this event, see BBC Motion Gallery footage of Bull Connor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9kT1yO4MGg&feature=related
18
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
authorities. United States political strategist Ron Christie said about the California incident: “I
wouldn't call that pepper-spray, I'd say that was a pepper-hose” providing some intertextual
discourse between the two pictures. (today.com 2011)
Another icon that provides some inter-iconicity is an icon of the recent Baltimore riots that
went viral in the last couple of days, where we see a black man being pepper-sprayed at point blank
range by a police officer. While the situation is different, a violent riot as opposed to a peaceful
students' protest, the compositional elements reflect again the same sentiment of the defenseless
victim against the authority. This way of 'framing' the pictures that come to represent the event are
instrumental in shaping public opinion about the event itself. As these pictures frame a sympathy in
favor of the protesters, the context surrounding the image -aggression by the protesters, multiple
warnings by the police- becomes less important as people 'feel' the pain that is portrayed in the
image.
19
Illustration 9: Civil Rights protestors demanding an end to segregation in Birmingham, Alabama's public facilities, are hit with high-pressure firehoses in this photo from 1963.Photo:Charles Moore/Black Star
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
Step 2: International status and sociopolitical impact
So far we have seen that the image of the pepper spray cop caused outrage in the United
States national media, and that its inter-iconicity reflected a sentiment of police brutality that spoke
to images dating back to the anti-segregation protests of 1963 in Birmingham. But what impact has
the icon had around the world? Did the icon help increase support or sympathy for the cause of
Occupy Wall Street worldwide?
Aside from the already stated disparity in power between the police officer and the
protesters, where the officer holds all the physical power, and the protesters lack any way to defend
themselves, this image does not speak directly for international power relations. Aside from the fact
that the image does not portray an apparent international event, which is usually the case for the
more well-know icons, the compositional elements to not speak an international discourse either.
The image shows what can be seen as a cliché of the 'American police officer': slightly overweight,
using force with little regard for the victims, and carrying a casual and uninterested demeanor while
doing so. This view alienates international viewers from feeling the immediacy of the picture,
because it may cause them to think: “Police officers in my country are not like that.” However, in
countries where police brutality is a more common occurrence, the image could invoke sentiments
of sympathy with the protesters. Even having said this, on an emotional level the sympathy for the
protesters is very clear. The viewer can rationalize around the pain of the protesters, but on a very
emotional level a connection is made with the suffering students.
Another particularity in the picture is that the victims are not clearly shown. We do not know
their ethnicity or gender, and can merely see that they seem to be young people, quite possibly
students. This does increase the international impact the image has through social media. Since
young students are the group most active on social media and blogs, they are drawn into the feeling
that it is a case of us -the students- against them -the authorities-. In that way the image speaks an
international power relation, not by showing international conflict, but by depicting a base conflict
that exists everywhere around the world, and of which this icon is merely one of the depictions.
Every student can sympathize with the students that are pepper sprayed, because they seem to share
in their misery. However, for non-students or more specifically citizens who have no direct relation
20
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
to students, the image might not cause a similar response. This creates a discrepancy between the
different groups that view this image, and some might react more intensely than others. For the
group that identifies closely with the victims the effect of the picture is very clear and we might
expect an intense reaction. The group that identifies less with the victims might need to be
'convinced' of the glaring political issue that the icon depicts through the context and discourse
provided by the channels through which they view the image.
Perhaps when looking at the contextual discourse that accompanies the image we can find a
larger impact, after all, when looking at the image the lines of who is wrong and who is right are
slightly blurred, perhaps the students are actively blocking an important public space and need to be
removed. In most media reports of the pepper spray event, the picture was accompanied by an
analysis of the event. The first thing that most media mentioned is that the pepper-spray was used at
'point blank range', while actually the recommended distance for using the pepper-spray is six feet.
(CNN 2011) Knowing this invokes a stronger sentiment against the actions of the police officer,
knowing that he not only used excessive force against the defenseless protesters, but also did so in
an unreasonable and dangerous manner. After the incident, eleven protesters received medical
treatment, and two of those were hospitalized to be treated for nerve damage as a result of being
pepper-sprayed. (Golden 2011) Most media coverage of the pepper-spray incident was also
accompanied by mobile phone footage of the incident, which gives an insight into the role of the by
standing crowd. In most of the videos that circulated the media, the crowd can be hear shouting
“shame on you!” and “let them go!” at the police officer. In addition most news coverage included
witness reports saying that it was a non-violent protest, that the protesters were only sitting there,
linking arms (cbslocal.com 2011) The discourse frames the icon in such a way that the viewer
becomes increasingly sympathetic for the protesters and their cause, and it caused the subject of
police brutality to resurface in the national media of the United States.
While the icon does clearly have an impact on the sociopolitical landscape in the North-
American region thanks to its compositional elements and the contextual discourse, it did not attract
a lot of international attention. This can be attributed to the compositional elements that were
discussed, but I think the biggest cause for the lack of international circulation is that initially, the
21
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
icon itself was not picked up by many international media outlets, and thus the icon relied entirely
on social media for international circulation. As we know, photojournalistic images are not very
social-media friendly, (Mandiberg 2012) and that explains why the icon itself was not shared to a
large extent. When the icon was posted on social media platform Reddit, (Reddit 2012) the image
had an up-vote percentage of 97%, which is considerable, however the image did not make it past
this platform. Yet, through its appropriations, the icon of the pepper spraying cop did achieve
international notoriety.
Step 3: Appropriations of the icon
The earlier steps showed that the icon of the pepper spraying cop did not speak
'internationality' in itself, and that perhaps because of that the image was not picked up by enough
international media outlets to have a global impact on the sociopolitical landscape. But as discussed
in the introduction, the discussion on police brutality was very much present in all countries where
Occupy protests took place. Perhaps this particular icon relied heavily on its appropriation to make
an international and global impact. The photojournalistic image of the “Pepper Spraying Cop” had a
hard time circulating internationally through classic media as well as through social media channels.
However, in the days following the event the internet was flooded with images of the “Pepper
Spraying Cop”, but these were not the initial photograph, rather they were photoshopped
appropriations of the police officer and his 'chemical weapon'. (Matyszczyk 2011) Indeed
Lieutenant John Pike, on the internet famous under the alias “Pepper Spraying Cop”, had become
an internet meme.
The study of memetics is based on the book by famous atheist Richard Dawkins: The Selfish
Gene. Dawkins states that ideas are not merely created by people, but that people are shaped by
ideas, and that these ideas can spread horizontally through global society, like a virus. (Dawkins
1989) The study of memetics thus does not concern itself with the question of wether an idea is
true, but rather if an idea is successful in surviving in the minds of a large group of people. (Lynch
1996, ix) The meme started with an image of Lieutenant Pike walking through the painting “A
Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” by George Seurat, and casually pepper
22
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
spraying one of the inhabitants of the painting. After this, many more depictions of the cop in
famous paintings surfaced on social media and in mainstream news media. (Judkis 2011) After that
it was the turn for meme-mashups, where the icon of the pepper spraying cop was incorporated into
exiting memes or icons. It even sprang a Tumblr page that collected these memes under the caption:
“Little did we know that Pepper Spraying Cop has cracked down on so many famous
moments in history!! We will help document the long pepper spraying arm of the law! Send all text
inquiries to [email protected]. Got photo evidence? Submit this to Tumblr!”
(peppersprayingcop.tumblr.com 2015) The meme did not just stay on the internet and social media.
After the initial memes, the icon of the pepper spraying cop spread to other media formats. Street
art incorporating the icon surfaced, in the style of famous artist Banksy, in various cities around the
world -below-. And the meme even sprang a forty-two page online comic book, relaying the events
of the incident and what happened afterwards.
23
Illustration 11: Spraying in the park
Illustration 13: A nod to Banksy
Illustration 12: Pepper Spraying Cop, incorporated into the NBA logo
Illustration 10: Pepper Spraying Cop by -assumed- Banksy
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
In addition to these memetic appropriations that were made in different media formats, and which
helped spread knowledge about the incident of police brutality during the OWS protests, there have
been other photographic appropriations that made a critical intervention in news media in other
regions. This concerns images that, while not replicas of the original icon, appropriate the key
elements of the icon in a new regional setting.
Through these appropriations, the same sentiments that the original icon invokes are brought
closer to the global citizen. As already discussed the excluding properties of the icon hampered its
international circulation, and through that its impact on the international sociopolitical landscape.
However, the appropriations of the image that surfaced around the globe gave a change for the icon
to impact other regions as well.
Taking a look at images that rose to iconic status in their region, we can clearly see a
recurring theme in these images. In Turkey with #OccupyGezi, Germany and #Blockupy and China's
#OccupyCentral, the images show similar elements of defenseless and harmless protesters, against
excessive use of force by the police authorities depicted in the photograph.
24
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
25
Illustration 14: A police officer uses a baton on a pro-democracy protesters near the office of the Chief Executive in Hong Kong on Dec. 1, 2014. Reuters
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
26
Illustration 15: A Body of Gezi Park. 31 May 2013. From Yücel Tunca via Nar Photos.
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
27
Illustration 16: Policemen detain members of 'Blockupy' anti-capitalist movement near theEuropean Central Bank (ECB) building before the official opening of its new headquartersin Frankfurt March 18, 2015. (Reuters / Michael Dalder)
Framing SympathiesA Study of a Visual Icon in Occupy Wall Street
By Coen Berkhout (s2205815)University of Groningen
Professor: D.U. Shim
All these iconic images gained their status considerably later than the original icon, but as
Lene Hansen accurately states:
“First, even in the case of ‘instant’ icons their effect on policy might not occur within the relatively short time-
frame adopted by studies in the news events tradition. Rather, icons might ‘influence public debate in a more indirect
and long-term fashion’.”(Hansen 2014, 275)(Bennett, Lawrence and Livingston 2006, 481)
The long-term effect of the icon lies in its inter-iconicity. These three appropriations link
back to the original icon, and make a critical intervention on the sociopolitical landscape. In the
case of the Blockupy protests, which started with 6,000 protestors, after the image went viral, the
number of protesters increased to 17,000 people. And the protests turned increasingly violent.
(rt.com 2015) In the case of the Occupy Gezi protests the events during the protest, and namely the
acts of police brutality against the protesters, remain a topic of discussion in domestic and
international media. (Letsch 2014)(Jadaliyya.com 2013) And again the tactics employed by the
authorities, and the quick circulation of the images of protesters being tear-gassed on blogs caused
and increase in support for the protests. (Bianet - Bagimsiz Iletisim Agi 2013) In the case of the
Occupy Central for Love and Peace movement in China, the three instigators of the protest
eventually turned themselves in to the authorities out of fear for more police crackdowns on the
protesters. In a letter they write:
“In the past two weeks, the police have cracked down hard on protesters in the occupied sites. Our young
people have used their bodies to withstand the blows of police batons, their blood and broken bones have brought us the
deepest sorrow. We respect the students’ and citizens’ determination to fight for democracy, and we are furious at the
government’s heartless indifference. A government that uses police batons to maintain its authority is a government that
is beyond reason. For the sake of the occupiers’ safety, for the sake of our original intention of love and peace, as we
prepare to surrender, we three urge the students to retreat – to put down deep roots in the community and transform the
movement to extend the spirit of the Umbrella Movement.“5
Yet before this, images of Hong Kong citizens being tear-gassed circulated in international
5 The letter in its entirety can be read online on the website of the Occupy Central for Love and Peace movement: http://oclp.hk/index.php?route=occupy/eng_detail&eng_id=61