Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 1 Physics 211: Lecture 15 Physics 211: Lecture 15 Today’s Agenda Today’s Agenda Elastic collisions in one dimension Analytic solution (this is algebra, not rocket science!) Center of mass reference frame Colliding carts problem Two dimensional collision problems (scattering) Solving elastic collision problems using COM and inertial reference frame transformations Some interesting properties of elastic collisions Center of mass energy and energy of relative motion
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 1
Physics 211: Lecture 15Physics 211: Lecture 15
Today’s AgendaToday’s Agenda
Elastic collisions in one dimension Analytic solution (this is algebra, not rocket science!)
Center of mass reference frame Colliding carts problem Two dimensional collision problems (scattering) Solving elastic collision problems using COM and inertial reference
frame transformations
Some interesting properties of elastic collisions Center of mass energy and energy of relative motion
The concept of momentum conservation is one of the most fundamental principles in physics. This is a component (vector) equation.
We can apply it to any direction in which there is no external force applied. You will see that we often have momentum conservation even when kinetic energy is not conserved.
FP
EXTddt
ddtP 0 FEXT 0
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 3
Comment on Energy ConservationComment on Energy Conservation
We have seen that the total kinetic energy of a system undergoing an inelastic collision is not conserved.
Mechanical Energy is lost: (remember what this is??)» Heat (bomb)» Bending of metal (crashing cars)
Kinetic energy is not conserved since dissipative work is done during an inelastic collision! (here, KE equals mechanical energy)
Total momentum, PT, along a certain direction is conserved when there are no external forces acting in this direction.
F = ma = dPT/dt says this has to be true!! (Newton’s Laws) In general, momentum conservation is easier to satisfy than
mechanical energy conservation. Remember: in the absence of external forces, total energy
(including heat…) of a system is always conserved even when mechanical energy is not conserved.
How much do two objects that inelastically collide heat up?
A box sliding on a frictionless surface collides and sticks to a second identical box which is initially at rest. What is the ratio of initial to final kinetic energy of the system?
Elastic Collision in 1-DElastic Collision in 1-Dgeneral case: general case: unequal massesunequal masses
Algebra just gave us the following equations based on conservation of momentum and mechanical energy:
Now just solve for final velocities, v1,f and v2,f in terms of v1,i and v2,i
2 1 21, 2, 1,
1 2 1 2
2f i i
m m mv v v
m m m m
v1,i + v1,f = v2,f + v2,i
m1(v1,i - v1,f ) = m2(v2,f - v2,I )
1 2 12, 1, 2,
1 2 1 2
2f i i
m m mv v v
m m m m
v2,f = v1,i v1,f = v2,i
When m1 = m2
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 18
Another way to solve elastic collision Another way to solve elastic collision problems:problems:
CM Reference FrameCM Reference Frame We have shown that the total momentum of a system of
particles is the velocity of the CM times the total mass:
PPNET = MVVCM.
We have also discussed reference frames that are related by a constant velocity vector (i.e.they’re in relative motion).
Now consider putting yourself in a reference frame in which the CM is at rest. We call this the CM reference frame. In the CM reference frame, VVCM = 0 (by definition) and
therefore PPNET = 0. This is a cool mathematical tool that makes the algebra
solving this much simpler (it doesn’t change the physical situation)
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 19
Lecture 15, Lecture 15, Act 2Act 2Force and MomentumForce and Momentum
Two men, one heavier than the other, are standing at the center of two identical heavy planks. The planks are at rest on a frozen (frictionless) lake somewhere in Wisconsin.
The men start running on their planks at the same speed. Which man is moving faster with respect to the ice?
Consider one of the runner-plank systems: There is no external force acting in the x-direction:
Momentum is conserved in the x-direction! The initial total momentum is zero, hence it must remain so. We are observing the runner in the CM reference frame!
x
Let the mass of the runner be m and the plank be M.
m
M
Let the speed of the runner and the plank with respect to the ice be vR and vP respectively.
The velocity of the runner with respect to the plank is V = vR - vP (same for both runners).
x
m
M
vR
vP
MvP = - mvR (momentum conservation, it’s zero!)
Plugging vP = vR - V into thiswe find:
v VM
m MR
So vR is greater if m is smaller.
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 24
Example 1: Using CM Reference FrameExample 1: Using CM Reference Frame
A glider of mass m1 = 0.2 kg slides on a frictionless track with initial velocity v1,i = 1.5 m/s. It hits a stationary glider of mass m2 = 0.8 kg. A spring attached to the first glider compresses and relaxes during the collision, but there is no friction (i.e. energy is conserved). What are the final velocities?
x
m1m2 v1,i vv2,i = 0
VVCM
m1m2
m1vv1,f vv2,fm2
+ = CM
Video
of
CM frame
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 25
Example 1...Example 1...
Four step procedure
First figure out the velocity of the CM, VVCM.
» VVCM = (m1vv1,i + m2vv2,i), but vv2,i = 0 in this case so
VVCM = vv1,i
So VVCM = 1/5 (1.5 m/s) = 0.3 m/s
1
1 2m m
m
m m1
1 2
(for vv2,i = 0 only)
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 26
Example 1...Example 1...
If the velocity of the CM in the “lab” reference frame is VVCM, and the velocity of some particle in the “lab” reference frame is vv, then the velocity of the particle in the CM reference frame is v*v* where:
This is the CM frame velocityIf you were traveling along with the CM, you
would see the velocity of the mass to be less than in the lab frame in this case
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 27
Example 1...Example 1... Calculate the initial velocities in the CM reference frame
(all velocities are in the x direction):
v*v*1,i = vv1,i - VVCM = 1.5 m/s - 0.3 m/s = 1.2 m/s
v*v*2,i = vv2,i - VVCM = 0 m/s - 0.3 m/s = -0.3 m/s
v*v*1,i = 1.2 m/s
v*v*2,i = -0.3 m/s
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 28
Example 1 continued...Example 1 continued...
Now consider the collision viewed from a frame moving with the CM velocity VVCM. ( jargon: “in the CM frame”)
m1m2 v*v*1,i v*v*2,i
xm2 m1
m1v*v*1,f v*v*2,f
m2
Movie
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 29
Energy in Elastic Collisions:Energy in Elastic Collisions: Use energy conservation to relate initial and final velocities. The total kinetic energy in the CM frame before and after the
collision is the same, it’s elastic!! (look how we write this…)
But the total momentum is zero, both initial and final:
Now we can calculate the final velocities in the lab reference frame, using:
vv1,f = v*v*1,f + VVCM = -1.2 m/s + 0.3 m/s = -0.9 m/s
vv2,f = v*v*2,f + VVCM = 0.3 m/s + 0.3 m/s = 0.6 m/s
vv1,f = -0.9 m/s
vv2,f = 0.6 m/s
v v = v*v* + VVCM
v*v* = vv - VVCM
Four easy steps! No need to solve a quadratic equation!!Especially important in 2D
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 32
Lecture 15, Lecture 15, Act 3 Act 3 Moving Between Reference FramesMoving Between Reference Frames
Two identical cars approach each other on a straight road. The red car has a velocity of 40 mi/hr to the left and the green car has a velocity of 80 mi/hr to the right.
What are the velocities of the cars in the CM reference frame?
Lecture 15, Lecture 15, Act 3 Act 3 Moving Between Reference FramesMoving Between Reference Frames
The velocity of the CM is:
x
Vm m
mhrCM 80 40
2 mi /
= 20 mi / hr
20mi/hr
CM
80mi/hr 40mi/hr
So VGREEN,CM = 80 mi/hr - 20 mi/hr = 60 mi/hr
So VRED,CM = - 40 mi/hr - 20 mi/hr = - 60 mi/hr
The CM velocities are equal and opposite since PNET = 0 !!
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 34
As a safety innovation, Volvo designs a car with a spring attached to the front so that a head on collision will be elastic. If the two cars have this safety innovation, what will their final velocities in the lab reference frame be after they collide?
Summary: Using CM Reference Frame Summary: Using CM Reference Frame
: Determine velocity of CM
: Calculate initial velocities in CM reference frame
: Determine final velocities in CMreference frame
: Calculate final velocities in lab reference frame
VVCM =
21 mm
v*v* = vv - VVCM
v*f = -v*i
v v = v*v* + VVCM
(m1vv1,i + m2vv2,i)
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 37
Interesting FactInteresting Fact
We just showed that in the CM reference frame the speed of an object is the same before and after the collision, although the direction changes.
The relative speed of the blocks is therefore equal and opposite before and after the collision. (v*1,i - v*2,i) = - (v*1,f - v*2,f)
But since the measurement of a difference of speeds does not depend on the reference frame, we can say that the relative speed of the blocks is therefore equal and opposite before and after the collision, in any reference frame.
Rate of approach = rate of recession
v*1,i v*2,i
v*1,f = -v*1,iv*2,f = -v*2,i
This is really cool and useful too!
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 38
Basketball Demo.Basketball Demo. Carefully place a small rubber ball (mass m) on top of a much bigger basketball (mass M). Drop these from some height. The height reached by the small ball after they “bounce” is ~ 9 times the original height!! (Assumes M >> m and
all bounces are elastic). Understand this using the “speed of approach = speed of recession” property we just proved.
v
v
v
v
3v
v
(a) (b) (c)
m
M M
Drop 2 balls
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 39
Basketball Demo.Basketball Demo.
Initially, both balls drop with same velocity, since they started at the same time
The basketball bounces off the floor and has the same speed in the upward direction as it had going downward just before it hit the floor
Now the basketball and the golf ball collide. In CM frame, the golf ball has velocity almost -2v prior to collision.
In lab frame the golf ball recoil is reduced by v, and equals 3v
v
v
v
(a)
m
M M
v
(b)
3v
v
(c)
Drop 2 balls
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 40
important comments on energy illustrated here…important comments on energy illustrated here…
Consider the total kinetic energy of the system in the lab reference frame:
so
(same for v2)
E m v m vLAB 1
2
1
21 12
2 22 but
CM2
CM1
Vv
Vv v*1
v*2
1CM21
2CM11
21 2Vv Vvv v* v*
= KREL = KCM= PNET,CM = 0
2211CM2
CM21222
211LAB mmVmm
21
m21
m21
E Vv* v* v* v*
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 41
More comments on energy...More comments on energy...
Consider the total kinetic energy of the system in the LAB reference frame:
= KREL = KCM
So ELAB = KREL + KCM
KREL is the kinetic energy due to “relative” motion in the CM frame.
KCM is the kinetic energy of the center of mass.
This is true in general, not just in 1-DThis is true in general, not just in 1-D
2CM21
222
211LAB Vmm
21
m21
m21
E v* v*
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 42
More comments on energy...More comments on energy...
ELAB = KREL + KCM
Does total energy depend on the reference frame??
YOU BET!
KREL is independent of the reference frame, but KCM depends on the reference frame (and = 0 in CM
reference frame).
Physics 211: Lecture 15, Pg 43
Recap of today’s lectureRecap of today’s lecture
Elastic collisions in one dimension (Text: 8-6)
Center of mass reference frame (Text: 8-7) Colliding carts problem
Some interesting properties of elastic collisions Killer bouncing balls
Look at textbook problems Look at textbook problems Chapter 8: # 71, 73, 75