Top Banner
Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South- Western College Publishing Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Leadership Leadership Behavior Behavior and Motivation and Motivation Modified by: Modified by: Professor Jeffrey M. Professor Jeffrey M. Wachtel, Ph. D. Wachtel, Ph. D. 3-1
26

Chapter 3

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

eagan-flowers

Chapter 3. Leadership Behavior and Motivation Modified by: Professor Jeffrey M. Wachtel, Ph. D. 3-1. Iowa State University Leadership Styles: L eadership style is the combination of traits, skills, and behaviors managers use as they interact with employees. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Chapter 3Chapter 3Leadership BehaviorLeadership Behavior

and Motivationand Motivation

Modified by:Modified by: Professor Jeffrey M. Wachtel, Ph. D.Professor Jeffrey M. Wachtel, Ph. D.

3-1

Page 2: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Iowa State University Iowa State University Leadership Styles:Leadership Styles:

LLeadership style is the eadership style is the combination of traits, combination of traits, skills, and behaviors skills, and behaviors managers use as they managers use as they

interact with employeesinteract with employees. . Autocratic...........................Democratic

3-3

Page 3: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

DiscussionDiscussion

• Recall a present/past boss. Which of the Iowa State University leadership styles did your boss use most often? Describe the behavior of your boss.

Page 4: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

The University of The University of MichiganMichigan

One-Dimensional Two One-Dimensional Two Leadership Styles ModelLeadership Styles Model

Job CenteredJob Centered................Employee CenteredEmployee Centered

3-4

Page 5: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

The Ohio State & University of The Ohio State & University of Michigan Michigan

Two-Dimensional Leadership Two-Dimensional Leadership StylesStyles

Ohio State UniversityHigh

Low Structure High Structureand andHigh Consideration High Consideration

Low Structure High Structureand andLow Consideration Low Consideration

Low

Initiating StructureLow High

OOC

O

N

S

I

D

E

R

A

T

I

O

N

3-5

Page 6: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Do you think a manager has to be concerned with both Do you think a manager has to be concerned with both production and with people ?production and with people ?

3-6

““Although there is no one best Although there is no one best leadership style leadership style in all situations, in all situations, employees are employees are more satisfied more satisfied with a leader who is with a leader who is high in high in consideration.”consideration.”

Page 7: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

• Both of the leadership functions do not have to be carried out by the manager!

Page 8: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Blake, Mouton, and McCanse Blake, Mouton, and McCanse Leadership GridLeadership Grid

CCOONNCCEERRNN--PPEEOOPPLLEE

1 CONCERN for PRODUCTIONCONCERN for PRODUCTION 9Low High

Low

High1,9Country Club

1,1 9,1

9,9

5,5

Impoverished

Team Leader

Middle of the Road

Authority-Compliance

3-7

Page 9: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Major Motivation TheoriesMajor Motivation Theories

Classification of Motivation

Theories

1.1.Content Motivation Content Motivation theoriestheories

2.2.Process Motivation Process Motivation TheoriesTheories

3.3.Reinforcement TheoryReinforcement Theory

Specific Motivation Theory

a. Hierarchy of needs theory, ERG

b. Two-factor theoryc. Acquired needs

theory

a. Equity theory b. Goal-setting

theoryc. Expectancy theory

Type of Reinforcement a. Positiveb. Avoidancec. Extinctiond. Punishment

3-10

Page 10: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

The Motivation ProcessThe Motivation Process

Need Motive Behavior Consequence Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction

FeedbackFeedback

3-9

Page 11: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Hierarchy ofNeeds or ERG

Two-Factor

Acquired Needs

33Content Content

MotivationMotivationTheoriesTheories

33Content Content

MotivationMotivationTheoriesTheories

3-8

Page 12: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Self-Actualization

Esteem

Social

Safety

Physiological

Hierarchy of Needs TheoryHierarchy of Needs Theory

3-11

Page 13: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Alderfer’s ERG Theory Alderfer’s ERG Theory Alderfer’s ERG Theory Alderfer’s ERG Theory

ExistenceExistenceExistenceExistence GrowthGrowth

RelatednessRelatednessRelatednessRelatedness

ExistenceExistenceExistenceExistence

ฉPrentice Hall, 2001

Chapter 6 5

3 Need Levels3 Need LevelsGrowthGrowth

Growth (Esteem)Growth (Esteem)

Relatedness (Social)Relatedness (Social)

Existence (Safety)Existence (Safety)

Existence (Physiological)Existence (Physiological)

Page 14: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Herzberg’s Hygiene-MotivatoHerzberg’s Hygiene-Motivator Two-Factor Theoryr Two-Factor Theory

Herzberg’s Hygiene-MotivatoHerzberg’s Hygiene-Motivator Two-Factor Theoryr Two-Factor Theory

Hygiene FactorsHygiene Factors Motivational FactorsMotivational Factors

• Rate of pay•Quality of supervision• Company policies• Working conditions• Relations with others• Job security

• Rate of pay•Quality of supervision• Company policies• Working conditions• Relations with others• Job security

• Career Advancement

• Personal growth

• Recognition

• Responsibility

• Achievement

• Career Advancement

• Personal growth

• Recognition

• Responsibility

• Achievement

High HighJob Dissatisfaction Job Satisfaction0

Page 15: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Two Factor Theory Two Factor Theory • Motivating Employees with Two-Factor

Theory. Under the old management paradigm, money (and other extrinsic motivators) was considered the best motivator. Under the new leadership paradigm, pay is important but matters more to some people, but it is not the best motivator; intrinsic motivators are. Herzberg developed job enrichment (the process of building motivators into the job itself by making it more interesting and challenging) that has been used successfully to motivate employees to higher levels of performance at many organizations

Page 16: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Acquired Needs TheoryAcquired Needs Theory(employees are motivated by their need for:)(employees are motivated by their need for:)

AffiliationAffiliation

PowerPower

AchievementAchievement

3-12

Page 17: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Motivating Employees with a Motivating Employees with a High n Ach:High n Ach:

• Give them non-routine, challenging tasks in which there are clear attainable objectives. Give them fast and frequent feedback on their performance. Continually give them increased responsibility for doing new things. Keep out of their way.

Page 18: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Motivating Employees with a Motivating Employees with a High n Pow: High n Pow:

• Let them plan and control their jobs as much as possible. Try to include them in decision making, especially when they are affected by the decision. They tend to perform best alone rather than as team members. Try to assign them to a whole task rather than just a part of a task.

Page 19: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Motivating Employees with Motivating Employees with High n Aff: High n Aff:

• Be sure to let them work as part of a team. They derive satisfaction from the people they work with rather than the task itself. Give them lots of praise and recognition. Delegate responsibility for orienting and training new employees to them. They make great buddies and mentors.

Page 20: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Equity TheoryEquity Theory

= Others’ input (contributions)

Others’ outcomes (rewards)

Our inputs (contributions)

=Our outcomes (rewards)

(proposed that employees are motivated when (proposed that employees are motivated when their perceived inputs equal outputs.)their perceived inputs equal outputs.)

3-13

Page 21: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Ratio Comparison*

Employee’sPerception

Outcomes A

Inputs A

Outcomes A

Inputs A

Outcomes A

Inputs A

Outcomes B

Inputs B

Outcomes B

Inputs B

Outcomes B

Inputs B

<

=

>

Inequity (Under-Rewarded)

Equity

Inequity (Over-Rewarded)

*Where A is the employee, and B is a relevant other or referent.

Equity TheoryEquity Theory

Page 22: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Expectancy TheoryExpectancy Theory Proposes that

employees are motivated when they believe they can accomplish the task and the rewards for doing so are worth the effort.

3-14

Page 23: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Expectancy Theory

3. Rewards-personal goals relationship

1. Effort-performance relationship

2. Performance-rewards relationship

IndividualIndividualEffortEffort

IndividualIndividualPerformancePerformance

PersonalPersonalGoalsGoals

OrganizationalOrganizationalRewardsRewards

1 2

3

Page 24: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

You Get WhatYou Get WhatYouYouReinforceReinforce

3-15

Page 25: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Reinforcement Theory Reinforcement Theory

ConsequencesConsequences

RewardsRewards

No RewardsNo Rewards

PunishmentPunishment

BehaviorBehavior

Page 26: Chapter 3

Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development, 1E, Lussier/Achua ©2001 South-Western College Publishing

• SpecificitySpecificity

• ChallengeChallenge

• FeedbackFeedback

• ParticipationParticipation

• CommitmentCommitment

• ProductivityProductivity

Goal-Setting TheoryGoal-Setting Theory: : LockeLocke