PROCESS AND STATUS OF CAADP IMPLEMENTATION IN COMESA By Dr. Nalishebo Meebelo Deputy CAADP Coordinator During the EAST AND CENTRAL AFRICA CAADP NUTRITION WORKSHOP 25 February 2013 Serena Hotel Dar es Salaam, TANZANIA
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PROCESS AND STATUS OF CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
By
Dr Nalishebo Meebelo Deputy CAADP Coordinator
During the
EAST AND CENTRAL AFRICA CAADP NUTRITION WORKSHOP
25 February 2013
Serena Hotel
Dar es Salaam TANZANIA
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION The COMESA Region
ndash Vision and Mission
ndash Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
The CAADP Framework and its Implementation Processes
ndash Background Management Levels and Process Benchmarks
StatusExperience in COMESA and other RECs
ndash Compact Signatures amp Post-compact StatusProcess
ndash Quality of Investment Plans
ndash Regional Dimensions of CAADP in COMESA
Focus 2013 and Beyond
COMESArsquoS OVERALL VISION AND MISSION
OUR VISION
n To attain a fully integrated internationally competitive regional economic community
economic prosperity
standards of living
political and social stability and peace
goods services capital and labour
freely moving across borders
OUR MISSION
n To achieve increased co-operation and integration in all fields of development particularly in
trade customs and monetary affairs
transport communications and
information
technology industry and energy
agriculture environment natural
resources and
gender
THE COMESA TREATY
To realise the vision and mission (Agr Devt)
COMESA Treaty (Chapter 18 Articles 129 to
137) mandates our member states to
Enhance development and cooperation in the agriculture sector
Attain Food Security and
Rational and Sustainable Agriculture Production in the Common Market
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION The COMESA Region
ndash Vision and Mission
ndash Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
The CAADP Framework and its Implementation Processes
ndash Background Management Levels and Process Benchmarks
StatusExperience in COMESA and other RECs
ndash Compact Signatures amp Post-compact StatusProcess
ndash Quality of Investment Plans
ndash Regional Dimensions of CAADP in COMESA
Focus 2013 and Beyond
COMESArsquoS OVERALL VISION AND MISSION
OUR VISION
n To attain a fully integrated internationally competitive regional economic community
economic prosperity
standards of living
political and social stability and peace
goods services capital and labour
freely moving across borders
OUR MISSION
n To achieve increased co-operation and integration in all fields of development particularly in
trade customs and monetary affairs
transport communications and
information
technology industry and energy
agriculture environment natural
resources and
gender
THE COMESA TREATY
To realise the vision and mission (Agr Devt)
COMESA Treaty (Chapter 18 Articles 129 to
137) mandates our member states to
Enhance development and cooperation in the agriculture sector
Attain Food Security and
Rational and Sustainable Agriculture Production in the Common Market
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
COMESArsquoS OVERALL VISION AND MISSION
OUR VISION
n To attain a fully integrated internationally competitive regional economic community
economic prosperity
standards of living
political and social stability and peace
goods services capital and labour
freely moving across borders
OUR MISSION
n To achieve increased co-operation and integration in all fields of development particularly in
trade customs and monetary affairs
transport communications and
information
technology industry and energy
agriculture environment natural
resources and
gender
THE COMESA TREATY
To realise the vision and mission (Agr Devt)
COMESA Treaty (Chapter 18 Articles 129 to
137) mandates our member states to
Enhance development and cooperation in the agriculture sector
Attain Food Security and
Rational and Sustainable Agriculture Production in the Common Market
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
OUR VISION
n To attain a fully integrated internationally competitive regional economic community
economic prosperity
standards of living
political and social stability and peace
goods services capital and labour
freely moving across borders
OUR MISSION
n To achieve increased co-operation and integration in all fields of development particularly in
trade customs and monetary affairs
transport communications and
information
technology industry and energy
agriculture environment natural
resources and
gender
THE COMESA TREATY
To realise the vision and mission (Agr Devt)
COMESA Treaty (Chapter 18 Articles 129 to
137) mandates our member states to
Enhance development and cooperation in the agriculture sector
Attain Food Security and
Rational and Sustainable Agriculture Production in the Common Market
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
OUR MISSION
n To achieve increased co-operation and integration in all fields of development particularly in
trade customs and monetary affairs
transport communications and
information
technology industry and energy
agriculture environment natural
resources and
gender
THE COMESA TREATY
To realise the vision and mission (Agr Devt)
COMESA Treaty (Chapter 18 Articles 129 to
137) mandates our member states to
Enhance development and cooperation in the agriculture sector
Attain Food Security and
Rational and Sustainable Agriculture Production in the Common Market
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
THE COMESA TREATY
To realise the vision and mission (Agr Devt)
COMESA Treaty (Chapter 18 Articles 129 to
137) mandates our member states to
Enhance development and cooperation in the agriculture sector
Attain Food Security and
Rational and Sustainable Agriculture Production in the Common Market
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
THE COMESA TREATY (ctrsquod)
COMESA encourages
A common regional agriculture policy and food self-sufficiency
CAADP Framework and its processes are a means to achieving the above
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
Importance of Agriculture in COMESA
Mainstay of the COMESA Economy
Engine for regional trade and integration economic growth amp
food security
Helps generate rural incomes and raise living standards of poor
populations
Major producers are smallholder farmers majority of whom
are women
Capacity to redress the current high food import bills
Contributes the GDP of the region
However annual sector growth rate is significantly low
Levels of Malnutrition Significantly High (Av AccUse ampUtlstn)
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
THE CAADP
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
BACKGROUND
Endorsed at the Maputo Assembly of HOSG of the
AU in 2003
Potential driver for economic growth and poverty
reduction
Encourages annual budgetary allocation of 10 to
agric
Targeted expenditure must enable at least 6
annual sectoral growth
Aligned to the attainment of the MDGs Alleviating hunger and poverty by 2015
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
BACKGROUND
Encourages Member States to formulate sound and comprehensive policies strategies and programmes for agriculture development and food security
Builds on existing initiatives (eg PRSPs Existing Agriculture
Programmes Agriculture Sector-wide Approaches Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Stakeholders)
Seeks to Align Agriculture Investment Plan to
Long Term Vision
Medium Term National Development Plans
National Agriculture Policy
Priority Growth Areas of the Sector
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
TRIGGERSMOTIVATION
Low production and productivity in the sector
Reduced focus and comparatively low investment in the sector
High food prices and inadequate trade policies
Poor performance in key livelihood and economic growth parameters despite
numerous efforts for better performance
huge commitmentsexpenditure in local and foreign financing
Commitment at HOS level to make a difference amp eager for a business model that would make that difference
Today some key emerging issues
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP TARGETS AND GOALS
Target 1Achieve at least 6 sustained annual
sector growth in AU member states
Target 2 A10
mutually agreed and
targeted public investment in
the agricultural sector
Aim Eradicate poverty amp hunger in
Africa and accelerate
the continentrsquos economic
growth thru agric-led initiatives
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP OBJECTIVES
CAADP seeks to bull Ensure collective responsibility of key
stakeholders through broad participationconsultation
bull Increase household incomes for the poor and vulnerable in society
bull Improve nutrition security
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull Develop and nurture strategic partnerships bull Identify collaboratively selected priority
areas that will bring about targeted and marked growth in the sector
bull Deal with access to regional and int markets including barriers to trade
bull Utilize areas of comparative advantage in our regions
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP OBJECTIVES (ctrsquod)
bull To encourage demand-driven research evidence based analysis to influence policies that aim at resuscitating agriculture
bull Work with sub-regional regional and international partners with comparative capacity to enhance regional and global competitiveness innovation and adaptation
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP PILLARS
AREAS ENCOURAGED FOR INVESTMENT
TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRU
FOOD AND
NUTRITION SECURITY
6 ANNUAL
SECTOR
GROWTH
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
bull LIVESTOCK - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FISHERIES - CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull FORESTRY ndash CAADP COMPANION DOC
bull Gender
bull Policy
bull Capacity Strengthening
bull HIVAids Etc
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP MANAGEMENT LEVELS
bull AU ndash Policy
bull NPCA ndash Technical
bull RECs ndash Coordination amp Facilitation
bull Country-Led and Owned By In ndashCountry Stakeholders
bull ie Country Teams (Government Private Sector CSOs Farmers Organizations Women Youth etc) + DPs etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
1 COMPACT SIGNATURE Launch - Sensitization for
Stakeholder Buy-In
Broad Consultative Process
Sector Stocktaking and of Analysis Growth Options
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
a Design of Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan
bull Quality (Alignment Consistency Pillars)
bull Expert Inputs
bull Budgeting + Costing
bull Embrace Best Practices
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
General Issues Related to Investment Plans Low investment planning capacity of In-Country Teams
Insufficient Technical Assistance amp Inadequate Programme Coherence
Imbalances between investment areas and Pillars
Insufficient detailed consideration of issues (eg value
chain devt SPS nutrition gender climate change etc)
Inadequate coherence in relating expenditure economic impact and poverty reduction
Weak MampE Frameworks and related implementation
modalities etc
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
2 POST COMPACT PROCESS
b Technical Reviews
Led by AUC NPCA RECs
Independent Experts
In-Country Consultations and Document Review
Technical Review Report
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS
3 POST COMPACT PROCESS
c Post-Compact High-Level Business
Meeting Presentation of Investment Plans and Related Budget
by Govt Technical Review Report Recommendations for improvement Roadmap for Improvement Formulation of Gap Financing
Proposals
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
STATUS OF
IMPLEMENTATION
IN COMESA
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
Rwanda ndash March 2007
Burundi ndashAugust 2009
Ethiopia ndash August 2009
Swaziland March 2010
Uganda ndash March 2010
Malawi ndash April 2010
Kenya ndash July 2010
Zambia ndashJanuary 18 2011
DRC ndash March 17 2011
Seychelles ndashSeptember 16 2011
Djibouti 19 April 2012
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
CAADP COMPACT SIGNATURES
bull AdvancedAdvancing Countries
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Comoros
Sudan
Eritrea
bull Other 2013 CAADP engagements are scheduled with Mauritius
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
POST COMPACT STATUS
Technical Reviews
bull Rwanda December 2009
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
bull Malawi September 2010
bull Ethiopia October 2010
bull Burundi August 2011
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
POST COMPACT STATUS
High Level Business Meetings
bull Rwanda December 2009 gap funding accessed beyond 100 USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)
bull Ethiopia 6-7 December 2010 (GAFSP accessed USD 515m)
bull Malawi August 2011 (GAFSP)
bull Burundi March 2012 (USD30m GAFSP)
bull Uganda September 2010
bull Kenya September 2010
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
Progress by Steps Leading To Round Table Processes and Signing of Compact in Member States
Process
Countries
Govt
Buy-in
Focal Point
appointed
CAADP
Launch
TC appointed Experts
engaged
Draft report
submitted
TC discussed
Report
Final Report
submitted
Stakeholder
Validation
Workshop
Compact
signed
Investment Plan
Developed
Technical
Review Done
Business
Meeting Held
Rwanda
Uganda
Kenya
Ethiopia
Malawi
Burundi
Swaziland
Zambia
DRC Congo
Seychelles
Djibouti 19 April 2012
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Madagascar
Comoros
Egypt
Mauritius
Eritrea
Libya
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
THE COMESA
REGIONAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
Objective of Regional Compact
AUNEPAD Recommendation
Adds value to National CAADP Compact
Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest (eg Trans-boundary harmonisation of standards and shared multi ndashcountry resources)
Increased involvement of private sector PPPs and development partners
To forge regional cooperation and integration
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
Current Status
ECOWAS has already developed their Regional Compact Other RECs such as EAC SADC IOC have initial work done COMESA Draft Regional Compact Document - September
2010 Major Areas Agriculture Commodities along Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity value
addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels
(Farmers Traders Processors etc )
Next Steps Document Review and Update Extension into the Tripartite Framework
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
WAY FORWARD Good progress made - need to accelerate the process through
demonstrated commitment by political leaders Strengthen Capacity of CAADP drivers in the country Strengthen Resource Mobilization for Implementation
(COMRESA RIF COMESA AIF Engage Bilaterals Multilateral) Proof Read NAIPs ndash Mainstreaming of emerging issues (eg
Climate Change Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Enhance Expert Input Advocate for greater political will Strengthen partnerships and broaden consultation Build Capacity (Eg Policy Analysis CAADP etc) Facilitate harmonization thorough policy dialogues (Nutrition
Policy PHLR Climate Smart Agriculture Fisheries etc)
Asante Sana
Asante Sana
Related Documents
