Top Banner
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost
16

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

Lee Woods
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Quality Cost

Page 2: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Quality as a Competitive ToolQuality – the total features and characteristics of a product or a service made or performed according to specifications to satisfy customers at the time of purchase and during use

A quality focus reduces costs and increases customer satisfaction

Page 3: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Quality as a Competitive Tool

Focusing on the quality of a product will generally build expertise in producing it, lower the costs of making it, create customer satisfaction for customers using it, and generate higher future revenues for the company selling it

Page 4: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Two Basic Aspects of Quality1. Design Quality – refers to how

closely the characteristics of a product or service meet the needs and wants of customers

2. Conformance Quality – refers to the performance of a product or service relative to its design and product specifications

Page 5: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Quality and Failure

ActualPerformance

DesignSpecifications

CustomerSatisfaction

ConformanceQualityFailure

DesignQualityFailure

Page 6: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Four Perspectives of theBalanced Scorecard

1.Financial2.Customer3.Internal Business

Process4.Learning and Growth

Page 7: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

The Financial Perspective: Costs of Quality (COQ) Four Categories of Quality Costs:

1. Prevention Costs – incurred to preclude the production of products that do not conform to specifications

2. Appraisal Costs – incurred to detect which of the individual units of products do not conform to specifications

3. Internal Failure Costs – incurred on defective products before they are shipped to customers

4. External Failure Costs – incurred on defective products after they are shipped to customers

Page 8: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Elements of Costs of Quality Reports

Page 9: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Determining COQ using Activity Based Costing

1. Identify the Chosen Product2. Identify the Product’s

Direct Costs of Quality3. Select the Cost-Allocation

Bases to Use for Allocating Indirect Costs of Quality to the Product

Page 10: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Determining COQ using Activity Based Costing (cont)4. Identify the Indirect Costs of

Quality Associated with each Cost-Allocation Base

5. Compute the Rate per Unit of Each Cost-Allocation Base Used to Allocate Indirect Costs of Quality to the Product

Page 11: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Determining COQ using Activity Based Costing (cont)6.Compute the Indirect Costs

of Quality Allocated to the Product

7.Compute the Total Costs of Quality by Adding All Direct and Indirect Costs of Quality Assigned to the Product

Page 12: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Activity-Based COG Analysis Illustration

Page 13: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Cost of Quality Exclusions Opportunity Costs as a result from

poor quality:1. Contribution Margin and Income

foregone from lost sales2. Lost Production3. Lower Prices

Excluded due to estimation difficulties and being unrecorded as to the financial accounting records

Page 14: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

The Learning & Growth Perspective for QualityEmployee turnover ratioEmployee empowerment – number of processes in which employees have the right to make decisions without consulting supervisors

Employee SatisfactionEmployee Training

Page 15: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Advantages of COQ (Financial) MeasuresCOQ focuses managers’ attention on the costs of poor quality

COQ measures assist in problem solving by comparing costs and benefits of different quality-improvement programs and setting priorities for cost reduction

COQ provides a single, summary measure of quality performance for evaluating tradeoffs among the costs of prevention, appraisal, internal failure and external failure

Page 16: © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Quality Cost.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Advantages of Nonfinancial Measures of QualityNonfinancial measures of quality are often easy to quantify and understand

Nonfinancial measures direct attention to physical processes and to areas that need improvement

Nonfinancial measures provide immediate short-run feedback on whether quality-improvement efforts have succeeded

Nonfinancial measures are useful indicators of future long-run performance