E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: 1212.1701 arXiv:1409.1633.
Post on 12-Jan-2016
223 Views
Preview:
Transcript
eRHIC IR CONSTRAINS FROM PHYSICS
E.C. Aschenauer
arXiv: 1212.1701
arXiv:1409.1633
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20152
REQUIREMENTS TO REALIZE THE PROGRAM
E.C. Aschenauer
Requirements from Physics:
High Luminosity ~ 1033 cm-2s-1 and higher Flexible center of mass energy 20 to 100 GeV upgradable to 140 GeV Electrons and protons/light nuclei (p, He3 or D) highly polarized Wide range of nuclear beams (D to Au, U, Pb) a wide acceptance detector with good PID (e/h and p, K, p) wide acceptance for protons from elastic reactions and neutrons from nuclear breakup
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20153
THE MODEL DETECTOR
low Q2
taggerand
luminositydetector
Hadron PID:-1<h<1: proximity focusing LiF (Aerogel)-RICH (CLEO) + TPC: dE/dx1<|h|<3: Dual-radiator RICH (Aerogel + C4F10) (modeled: LHC-b RICH-I)
Lepton-ID: -3 <h< 3: e/p 1<|h|<3: in addition Hcal response & g suppression via tracking|h|>3: ECal+Hcal response & g suppression via tracking
-4<h<4: Tracking (TPC+GEM+MAPS) MAPS: CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors
+h-h
E.C. Aschenauer
ToRoman Pots
&Zero DegreeCalorimeter
hadron beamlepton beam
Machine clear space +/- 4.5 m around IP
detector components down to 2o
Detector magnet aligned with lepton beam
backgrounds due to synchrotron and beam gas events have to
be kept at a minimum
Detector fully model in GeantHcal m-vertexEcal GEMRICH TPC
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20154 E.C. Aschenauer
eRHIC:Interaction Regionandancillary detector systems:
hadron and lepton polarimetersluminosity detectorlow Q2 taggerZDC and Roman Pot systems
all needed from the beginning
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20155
REQUIREMENTS FROM PHYSICS ON IR
E.C. Aschenauer
Summarized at: https://wiki.bnl.gov/eic/index.php/IR_Design_Requirements
Hadron Beam:1. the detection of neutrons of nuclear break up in the outgoing
hadron beam direction location/acceptance of ZDC2. the detection of the scattered protons from exclusive and
diffractive reaction in the outgoing proton beam direction the detection of the spectator protons from 3He and Deuterium
location/acceptance of RP; 3. space for hadron and local polarimetry
Lepton Beam:4. minimize impact of detector magnetic field on lepton beam
synchrotron radiation5. space for low Q2 scattered lepton detection6. space for the luminosity monitor in the outgoing lepton beam
direction7. space for lepton polarimetry
Important
eRHIC is a high luminosity machine 1033-34 cm-2s-1
such controlling systematics becomes crucial
luminosity measurement
lepton and hadron polarization measurement
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 2015
EXCLUSIVE REACTIONS
6
Large Rapidiy Gap method
o MX system and e’ measured
o Proton dissociation backgroundo High acceptance in h for detector
two methods: to select events
Need for HCal in the forward
region
E.C. Aschenauer
Cuts: Q2>1 GeV, 0.01<y<0.85 DVCS – photon kinematics:
proton/neutron tag method
o Measurement of t o Free of p-diss backgroundo Higher MX rangeo to have high acceptance for Roman Pots / ZDC challenging IR design
Need for Roman Pots
(RP)and
Zero Degree Calorimeter
(ZDC)
detector acceptance: h>4.5
increasing Hadron Beam Energy: influences max. photon energy at fixed hphotons are boosted to negative rapidities (lepton direction)
ROMAN POT STUDY – HOW CLOSE TO THE BEAM CAN WE GO?
expected beam width calculation
from table 3-1 in design report and the attached figure obtained from Dejan of the beta function beta_x = 2014m (at z=18m) beta_y = 3465m (at z=18m) epsilon (normalized) = 0.2e-6m gamma = 270 (for 250GeV protons)
eRHIC Brainstorming Meeting, BNL, Aug. 20138
DVCS WITH A FACTOR 10 LESS LUMI
E.C. Aschenauer
10 < Q2 < 17.78 GeV2
0.1 < x < 0.158
~ 1 year for EIC-WP eRHIC
EIC-WP Plotslope generated exponential in tdipole-fit: c2/dof = 17.2
statistics for t > 0.8 basically not existent cannot distinguish exp. from dipole shape
Study by S. Fazio
remember: t ~ pt2 of the forward
going scattered proton
pt = p cosΘ acceptance in theta limited by beam acceptance and beta-fct as the beam stay clear region is defined by them
9
|t| > 0.018 GeV2
5 GeV x 100 GeV
DVCS WITH A FACTOR 10 LESS LUMI
E.C. Aschenauer
high t low buncertainty does not yet accounted thatexp. shape cannot be determined from dipole
the t dependence can be transformed to a bt dependence through a Fourier transform
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201510
IMPACT OF BEAM EMITTANCE
E.C. Aschenauer
difference in unfolded bt spectrum based on lowest t accessiblept > 300 MeV vs. 200 MeVeven higher pt cuts would be bad
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201511
KINEMATICS OF BREAKUP NEUTRONS
E.C. Aschenauer
Results from GEMINI++ for 50 GeV Au
+/-5mrad acceptance seems sufficient
Important:• For coherent VM-production rejection power of incoherent needed up to 104
ZDC detection efficiency is critical
Can we reconstruct the eA collision geometry:
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201512
LUMINOSITY MEASUREMENTConcept: Use Bremsstrahlung ep epg as reference cross section
different methods: o Bethe Heitler, QED Compton, Pair Production
Hera: reached 1-2% systematic uncertainty
Goals for Luminosity Measurement: Integrated luminosity with precision δL< 1% Measurement of relative luminosity: physics-asymmetry/10
eRHIC challenges: with 1033 cm-2s-1 one gets on average 23 bremsstrahlungs photons/bunch for proton beam A-beam Z2-dependence this will challenge single photon measurement under 0o
E.C. Aschenauer
zero degree photon calorimeterhigh rate measured energy proportional to # photons subject to synchrotron radiation
additional pair spectrometerlow rate The calorimeters are outside of the primary synchrotron radiation fan The spectrometer geometry low energy cutoff in the photon spectrum, depends on dipole field and calorimeter transverse location
LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – THE ep->epg PROCESS
Two estimates of the expected angular distrubition of Bremsstrahlung photons Bethe-Heitler calculation
DJANGOH MC simulation
relative scaling (please ignore numbers on yaxis)
Bethe-HeitlerDJANGOH
• typical angle of emission is less than 0.03mrad• though there is a
fairly long tail to the distribution
• roughly factor of 10 less than contribution from beam divergence for top energy ep collisions (see next slide)
LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – BEAM OPTICS
calculation of the angular beam divergence (in radians)
sigma_theta = angular beam divergence epsilon = (normalized) emittance (taken from table 3-1 of the
design report) gamma = lorentz factor beta* = beam optics parameter at IP (5cm taken from table 3-
1) for 20x250 GeV e+p collisions
for other beam conditions
LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – ADDITIONAL EFFECT OF BEAM STEERING
considering the added effect if the IP moves a bit and is off center look at DJANGOH ep->epg events fed into EicRoot both curves include crossing angle (10 mrad) and angular beam
divergence (0.1mrad) and a flat z vertex spread of +/- 2.5cm black has all events at (0,0) (x,y) vertex red has events with (x,y) vertex distributed flat with +/- 0.5cm note that in this definition, the electron going direction is 0
degrees
LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – NEEDED APERTURE
will need roughly +/- 1 to 2 mrad of aperture for bremsstrahlung photons for lumi measurement depends strongly on beam optics, not so much on
the actual physics process do we have that much space?
I think yes in the current design (depending on exactly how far down the lumi system is installed)
EIC R&D Meeting January 201517
eRHIC: IR DESIGN
E.C. Aschenauer
e-Beam
Hadrons
synrad
Matching 16 mrad bends
“D0”
Cryostat
Cryostat
Cryostat CryostatCryostat
Cryostat
Plan View of IR Layout
10 mradcrossing
DetectorRegion
(e-beamaligned)
Philosophy: detect forward particles in the warm section between the IR magnets and Crab Cavities
ZDC
RomanPots
Design: compromises physics and machine requirements
low Q2 tagger (not to scale)
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201518
eRHIC IR
E.C. Aschenauer
Extended IR region and by pass modeled in Geant
low Q2-tagger RP
• gain acceptance with a station very far down (>40m)• still need to model this
• seems to be lost in magnet yoke
• can work with CAD to improve
-6 < θ < -5 mrad-5 < θ < -4 mrad-4 < θ < -3 mrad-3 < θ < -2 mrad-2 < θ < -1 mrad-1 < θ < 0 mrad 0 < θ < 1 mrad
e-polarimeter andluminosity detector are next to be integrated in IR andmodeled in Geant
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201519
eRHIC HADRON POLARIMETRY
Polarized hydrogen Jet Polarimeter (HJet)Source of absolute polarization (normalization for other polarimeters)Slow (low rates needs looong time to get precise measurements)
Proton-Carbon Polarimeter (pC) @ RHIC and AGS Very fast main polarization monitoring toolMeasures polarization bunch profile and lifetimeNeeds to be normalized to HJet
Local Polarimeters at Experiments sits between spin rotatorsCritical to define spin direction at experiments can use the concept of pCAll of these systems are necessary for the
proton beam polarization measurements and monitoring
E.C. Aschenauer
All the equipment is existing from RHIC with years
of operating experience
NEED to make sure the methods continue to work
eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201520
572 nm pulsed laser laser transport system laser light polarization
measured continuously
Considerations: Measure Polarization directly at IP
overlap of bremsstrahlungs and compton photons location, where bremsstrahlung contribution is small and synchrotron radiation is minimized
Measure after / before IP need to measure at location spin is fully longitudinal or transverse
1/6 turn should rotate spin by integer number of π constrain on location
Polarimeter technology needs to allow to have precision to measure polarisation correlated to bunch #, gatling gun cathode #, colliding proton bunch #
need to still integrate electron polarimeter fully into machine lattice / IR
ELECTRON POLARIMETER
E.C. Aschenauer
Method: Compton backscattering longitudinal polarization Energy asymmetry transverse polarization position asymmetry
segmented Calorimeter to measure both components
HERA LPol:achieved systematic uncertainty 1.4%
top related