IMPORTANCE OF BUNCH-BY-BUNCH POLARIZATION INFORMATION FOR EIC PHYSICS E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: 1212.1701 & 1108.1713
Dec 16, 2015
IMPORTANCE OF BUNCH-BY-BUNCH
POLARIZATION INFORMATION FOR EIC PHYSICS
E.C. Aschenauer
arXiv: 1212.1701 & 1108.1713
EIC User Meeting 20142
REQUIREMENTS TO REALIZE THE EIC PHYSICS PROGRAM
E.C. Aschenauer
Requirements from Physics:
High Luminosity ~ 1033 cm-2s-1 and higher Flexible center of mass energy Electrons and protons/light nuclei (p, He3 or D) highly polarised Wide range of nuclear beams (D to U) a wide acceptance detector with good PID (e/h and p, K, p) wide acceptance for protons from elastic reactions and neutrons from nuclear breakup
Important
EIC is a high luminosity machine >1033 cm-2s-1
such controlling systematics becomes crucial
luminosity measurement
lepton and hadron polarization measurement
EIC User Meeting 20143
g1P THE WAY TO FIND THE SPIN
E.C. Aschenauer
5 x 250 starts here
5 x 100 starts here
hep-ph:1206.6014 (M.Stratmann, R. Sassot, ECA) cross section:
pQCD scaling violations
world data
current data
w/ eRHIC data
EIC User Meeting 20144
IMPACT ON ∫DG FROM SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES
E.C. Aschenauer
Need systematics ≤ 2%
arXiv: 1206.6014
Dominant systematics:
Luminosity Measurement Relative Luminosity
needs to be controlled better then ALL
~10-4 at low x
Absolut polarization measurements:electron Pe and hadron Pp
relativeluminosity
EIC User Meeting 20145
IMPACT ON CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY IN p+p p0 ALL ON DG
E.C. Aschenauer
arXiv:1402.6296
relativeluminosity
2009: Relative Luminosity uncertainty same sizeas physics asymmetryR=1.18x10-3 + 0.21x10-3
ALL= 0.4 – 4 x 10-3
EIC User Meeting 20146
REASONS WHY POLARIZATION / CURRENT CAN VARY FROM BUNCH TO BUNCH
E.C. Aschenauer
Polarisation:Hadrons in a storage ring:source instabilitiesBeam-Beam effectsbunch-to-bunch emittance variation, Characteristic scale can be seen from AGSRHIC polarization profile variation for different bunches after accelerationleptons in a storage ring:Beam-Beam effectssource instabilities
leptons in eRHIC What is the expected fluctuation in polarisation from cathode to cathode in the gatling gun
from Jlab experience 3-5% Is there the possibility for a polarization profile for the lepton bunches
if then in the longitudinal direction can be circumvented with 352 MHz RF
Current:Hadrons & leptons in a storage ring:Variations in transfer efficiency from pre-accelerator to main ring beam-beam interaction is important, it affects the bunch lifetime during the storeleptons in eRHIC What fluctuation in bunch current for the electron do we expect
limited by Surface Charge, need to see what we obtain from prototype gun
EIC User Meeting 20147
RHIC HADRON POLARIMETRY
Polarized hydrogen Jet Polarimeter (HJet)Source of absolute polarization (normalization of other polarimeters)Slow (low rates needs looong time to get precise measurements)
Proton-Carbon Polarimeter (pC) @ RHIC and AGS Very fast main polarization monitoring toolMeasures polarization profile (polarization is higher in beam center) and lifetimeNeeds to be normalized to HJet
Local Polarimeters (in PHENIX and STAR experiments)Defines spin direction in experimental areaNeeds to be normalized to HJetAll of these systems are necessary for the
proton beam polarization measurements and monitoring
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC User Meeting 20148
RHIC HADRON POLARISATION AND BUNCH CURRENT
E.C. Aschenauer
Fill 17520 in 2013: Beginning
Fill 17520 in 2013: End
P↑
P↓
EIC User Meeting 20149
RHIC HADRON POLARISATION AND BUNCH CURRENT
E.C. Aschenauer
Fill 17571 in 2013: Beginning
Fill 17571 in 2013: End
P↑
P↓
PSTP-2013, Charlotesville, VA10
RHIC: POLARISATION-BUNCH CURRENT CORRELATION
E.C. Aschenauer
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.07-0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.01
00.010.020.03
Correlator vs. Energy Up Spin
B1B2Y1Y2
Energy [GeV]
Corr
elat
or
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
Correlator vs. Energy Down Spin
B1B2Y1Y2
Energy [GeV]
Corr
elat
or
Data from 2012-Run:
Small anti-correlationbetween polarisation andbunch current at injectionwhich washes out at collision energies
EIC User Meeting 201411
RHIC HADRON POLARISATIONAccount for beam polarization decay through fill P(t)=P0exp(-t/tp) growth of beam polarization profile R through fill
pCarbon polarimeter
x=x0
ColliderExperiments
),(),( 01011 yxIyxPP
),(),(),( 2111 yxIyxIyxPP
correlation of dP/dt to dR/dt
for all 2012 fillsat 250 GeV
Polarization lifetime has consequences for physics analysis different physics triggers mix over
fill different <P>
Result:
Have achieved 6.5% uncertainty for DSA and 3.4 for
SSAwill be very challenging to reduce to 1-2%
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC User Meeting 201412 E.C. Aschenauer
POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS TO RHIC HADRON POLARIMETRY
H-Jet: continuously monitor molecular fraction in the H-Jet
o currently dominant systematics factor 10 lower bunch current for eRHIC precision per fill
pC-polarimeters find longer lifetime and more homogenious target material for
the pC polarimeters can we calibrate energy scale of pC closer to Ekin(C) in CNI alternative detector technology for Si-detectors to detect C smaller emittance of beam
o reduced/eliminate x-y polarisation profileo harder to measure
polarised Deuterium and He-3 polarimetry will be challenging to use CNI you need to make sure D and He-3 did not break up
local polarimetry @ eRHIC integrate a pC-polarimeter between the spin-rotators
o disappearance of asymmetry means full longitudinal polarisation
EIC User Meeting 201413
LEPTON POLARIZATION
E.C. Aschenauer
572 nm pulsed laser laser transport system: ~80m laser light polarisation measured
continuously in box #2
Multi-Photon Mode:Advantages: - eff. independent of brems. bkg and photon energy cutoff - dP/P = 0.01 in 1 min
Disadvantage: - no easy monitoring of calorimeter performance
Am = (I3/2 – I1/2) / (I3/2 + I1/2) = Pe Pl Ap; Ap=0.184
Result:
Have achieved 1.4% uncertainty at
HERA
Method: Compton backscattering, i.e. HERA LPOL
EIC User Meeting 201414 E.C. Aschenauer
ep
PolarimeterLaser
laser polarisationneeds to be monitored Measure Polarization at IP
overlap of bremsstrahlungs and compton photons only possible if we have number of empty p-bunches = # cathods
luminosity loss need to know polarisation is fully longitudinal
segmented Calorimeter longitudinal polarization Energy asymmetry transverse polarization component position asymmetry
Measure after / before IP need to measure at location spin is fully longitudinal or transverse
1/6 turn should rotate spin by integer number of π After IP:
does collision reduce polarization problem at ILC for eRHIC very small need to measure at location, where bremsstrahlung contribution is small
Before IP: need to find room for photon calorimeter
Want to measure both the compton photon and the scattered lepton
eRHIC LEPTON POLARIMETER
Comptonphoton
detector
# of cathods in gattling gun:
20 golden number
This guarantees that a hadron bunch collides always with
the electrons produced from one particular cathode,
avoiding/reducing significantly harmful beam-beam effect
of electron beam parameter variations on the hadrons
EIC User Meeting 201415
POLARIZATION AND LUMINOSITY COUPLING
Concept: Use Bremsstrahlung ep epg as reference cross section
different methods: Bethe Heitler, QED Compton, Pair Production
Hera: reached 1-2% systematic uncertainty eRHIC BUTs:
with 1033cm-2s-1 one gets on average of 23 bremsstrahlungs photons/bunch for proton beam A-beam Z2-dependence
this will challenge single photon measurement under 0o
coupling between polarization measurement uncertainty and uncertainty achievable for lumi-measurement
no experience no polarized ep collider jet have started to calculate a with the help of Vladimir Makarenk
(NC PHEP BSU, Minsk), the CERN CLIC-QED calculations expert hopefully a is small E.C. Aschenauer
Goals for Luminosity Measurement:
Integrated luminosity with precision δL< 1%
Measurement of relative luminosity: physics-
asymmetry/10
Fast beam monitoring for optimization of ep-
collisions and control of mid-term variations of
instantaneous luminosity
EIC User Meeting 201416 E.C. Aschenauer
SUMMARY
The need for bunch by bunch polarisation information was documented there is need to monitor not only the polarization level
but also polarization bunch current correlations the polarimeter technology needs to allow for this
information the known challenges to measure polarisation have
been discussed but EIC will be the first polarised ep collider, therefore
there might be surprising effects influencing hadron and lepton polarisation o the unknown unknowns
EIC User Meeting 201418
LUMINOSITY MEASUREMENT: PHYSICS PROCESSES
E.C. Aschenauer
Bremsstrahlung ep egp:
Bethe-Heitler (collinear emission): very high rate of ‘zero angle’ photons and electrons, but sensitive to the details of beam optics at IP requires precise knowledge of geometrical acceptance suffers from synchrotron radiation sperature limitation pile-up
QED Compton (wide angle bremsstrahlung): lower rate, but stable and well known acceptance of central detector
Methods are complementary, different systematics
NC DIS: in (x,Q2) range where F2 is known to O(1%) for relative normalisation and mid-term yield control
HERA Concept: normally only g is measured Hera: reached 1-2% systematic uncertainty
EIC User Meeting 201419
LUMINOSITY DETECTORS zero degree calorimeter
high rate measured energy proportional to # photons subject to synchrotron radiation
alternative pair spectrometer
Vacuum
Chamber
L3
ge+/e-g e-
e+
Dipole Magnetvery thinConverter
L2L1
Segmented ECal
The calorimeters are outside of the primary synchrotron radiation fan The exit window conversion fraction reduces the overall rate The spectrometer geometry imposes a low energy cutoff in the photon spectrum, which depends on the magnitude of the dipole field and the transverse location of the calorimeters E.C. Aschenauer
EIC User Meeting 201420
REQUIREMENTS FROM PHYSICS ON IR
E.C. Aschenauer
Summarized at: https://wiki.bnl.gov/eic/index.php/IR_Design_Requirements
Hadron Beam:1. the detection of neutrons of nuclear break up in the outgoing
hadron beam direction location/acceptance of ZDC2. the detection of the scattered protons from exclusive and
diffractive reaction in the outgoing proton beam direction the detection of the spectator protons from 3He and Deuterium location/acceptance of RP; impact of crab-cavities on forward scattered protons
Lepton Beam:3. the beam element free region around the IR 4. minimize impact of detector magnetic field on lepton beam synchrotron radiation5. space for low Q2 scattered lepton detection6. space for the luminosity monitor in the outgoing lepton beam
direction7. space for lepton polarimetry
Important
EIC is a high luminosity machine 1033 cm-2s-1
such controlling systematics becomes crucial
luminosity measurement
lepton and hadron polarization measurement
EIC User Meeting 201421
eRHIC LEPTON BEAM eRHIC design is using the idea of a “Gatling” electron gun with a combiner? 20 cathodes one proton bunch collides always with electrons from one specific cathode
Important questions: What is the expected fluctuation in polarisation from cathode to cathode in the
gatling gun from Jlab experience 3-5%
What fluctuation in bunch current for the electron do we expect limited by Surface Charge, need to see what we obtain from prototype gun
Do we expect that the collision deteriorates the electron polarization. A problem discussed for ILC influences where we want to measure polarization in the ring
How much polarization loss do we expect from the source to flat top in the ERL.
Losses in the arcs have been significant at SLC
Is there the possibility for a polarization profile for the lepton bunches if then in the longitudinal direction can be circumvented with 352 MHz RF
Challenge:
Integrate Compton polarimeter into IR and Detector design
together with Luminosity monitor and low Q2-tagger
longitudinal polarization Energy asymmetry
segmented Calorimeter to measure possible transverse
polarization component position asymmetry
E.C. Aschenauer