Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Post on 13-Mar-2016

112 Views

Category:

Documents

57 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance. Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript

Quantifying Transportation NeedsQuantifying Transportation Needsand Assessing Revenue Options:and Assessing Revenue Options:

The Texas ExperienceThe Texas Experiencepresented topresented to

The Arkansas Blue Ribbon The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway FinanceCommittee on Highway Finance

Dr. David EllisResearch Scientist

Texas Transportation InstituteThe Texas A&M University System

College Station, Texas

Phone: 979.845.6165E-mail: d-ellis@tamu.edu

Two EffortsTwo EffortsThe 2030 Committee to

Determine Transportation Needs and Recommend Investment Level

The TRENDS Model to Assess Revenue Alternatives

Desired Mobility Level

Analytical ProcessAnalytical Process

Investment Required

Current/Future

Revenue Stream

Current/Future

Expense Stream

Economic ImpactBenefit/Cost

TheTRENDSModel

The2030

Committee

The 2030 Committee Needs The 2030 Committee Needs AssessmentAssessment

Needs Determination Needs Determination Process SummaryProcess SummaryTravel demand modelsPeak period speedsRegular delay and incident/irregular delayCalculate performance measuresIdentify road sections over congestion

thresholdEstimate road needed to accomplish

scenarioGroup by area type and functional classEstimate cost for area/functional class

additionsAdd interchange and right-of-way costs

Urban Mobility Analysis Urban Mobility Analysis OverviewOverview

Performance Measures• Peak and free-flow travel speed• Delay reductions from signal

coordination,• access mgmt, incident clearance,

ramp metering• Texas Congestion Index • Delay per “commuter” • Total delay and extra fuel costs

Types of BenefitsTypes of BenefitsDelay savings – compared to free-flowFuel savings – simple estimate (% of

delay)Reduced cost of goods and services

(productivity)Business Effects

◦Economic impact of construction◦Business profitability & job creation

Local tax revenue

Maintain Economic Competitiveness

Reduce Congestion

Current Funding Trend

Prevent Worsening Congestion

Inadequate Mobility Investment

MINIMUM

Delay Hours per Commuter in 2030

Mobility Investment and Congestion Mobility Investment and Congestion MitigationMitigation

Costs of Improvements and Costs of Improvements and CongestionCongestion

Total Investment Needed: 2010 to Total Investment Needed: 2010 to 20302030(in 2008 $)(in 2008 $)

2030 Need Area Investment Required

Pavements $ 89 Billion

Bridges $ 36 Billion

Urban Mobility $ 171 Billion

Rural Mobility and Safety Projects $ 17 Billion

TOTAL $ 313 Billion

The Transportation The Transportation Revenue Estimator and Revenue Estimator and Needs Determination Needs Determination System (TRENDS) ModelSystem (TRENDS) Model

Dynamic and InteractiveDynamic and InteractiveAnalytical Planning ToolAnalytical Planning ToolWeb-basedMenu DrivenAllows User to Make Choices

TRENDS Model ProcessTRENDS Model ProcessGallons of Fuel UsedPopulationRelationship of Fuel Used to

PopulationFuel EfficiencyFuel Used/Fuel Efficiency = VMTFuture Population yields Future

Fuel Use and VMT

The Relationship Between The Relationship Between Gasoline Used and Gasoline Used and PopulationPopulation

Relationship Between Diesel Relationship Between Diesel Fuel and PopulationFuel and Population

68 Variables68 VariablesTaxesFeesMaintenance LevelsFuel EconomyInflation RatePopulation

Report FormatsReport FormatsTabular FormRevenue and Expense StatementCharts

Backcasting Using the TRENDS Model

Absolute Mean Value of Error: 1992-2008

Gasoline Revenues: 2.19 % Diesel Revenues:2.68 % Registration Fee Revenues:

2.55 %

Alternative Fuel Economy Alternative Fuel Economy ScenariosScenarios

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

2028

2030

2032

2034

2036

2038

2040

Mile

s Pe

r G

allo

n"Low" Scenario" "Average" Scenario "High" Scenario

PROJECTED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 

Total RevenuesMaintenance and

Operating ExpendituresNew Capacity Expenditures

Annual Balance of Funds Cumulative Balance

 Fiscal Year

2010 $8,758,866,295 $5,719,566,241 $0 $3,039,300,054 $3,039,300,0542011 $8,666,176,935 $6,199,735,250 $0 $2,466,441,685 $5,505,741,7392012 $7,331,042,188 $6,565,611,249 $0 $765,430,938 $6,271,172,6772013 $7,394,794,904 $6,662,663,504 $0 $732,131,400 $7,003,304,0772014 $7,455,331,884 $6,788,181,923 $0 $667,149,961 $7,670,454,0382015 $6,509,064,724 $7,131,845,147 $0 -$622,780,423 $7,047,673,6142016 $6,558,673,619 $6,951,339,715 $0 -$392,666,095 $6,655,007,5192017 $6,582,076,715 $7,063,421,961 $0 -$481,345,245 $6,173,662,2742018 $6,600,459,874 $7,224,842,844 $0 -$624,382,971 $5,549,279,3032019 $6,611,094,702 $7,393,445,846 $0 -$782,351,144 $4,766,928,1592020 $6,612,209,268 $8,711,630,578 $0 -$2,099,421,310 $2,667,506,8492021 $6,603,964,888 $8,999,905,699 $0 -$2,395,940,811 $271,566,0372022 $6,584,919,464 $9,297,115,473 $0 -$2,712,196,009 -$2,440,629,9722023 $6,553,222,123 $9,636,769,543 $0 -$3,083,547,420 -$5,524,177,3912024 $6,506,690,326 $9,952,306,197 $0 -$3,445,615,871 -$8,969,793,2632025 $6,442,514,351 $10,319,739,231 $0 -$3,877,224,880 -$12,847,018,1422026 $6,371,518,932 $10,669,747,152 $0 -$4,298,228,221 -$17,145,246,3632027 $6,293,285,063 $10,933,478,274 $0 -$4,640,193,212 -$21,785,439,5752028 $6,207,281,506 $11,223,846,556 $0 -$5,016,565,050 -$26,802,004,6252029 $6,113,058,615 $11,634,934,560 $0 -$5,521,875,946 -$32,323,880,5702030 $6,010,008,576 $12,062,368,227 $0 -$6,052,359,651 -$38,376,240,2212031 $5,960,528,848 $12,381,798,447 $0 -$6,421,269,599 -$44,797,509,8202032 $5,922,511,254 $12,728,902,058 $0 -$6,806,390,804 -$51,603,900,6252033 $5,895,448,048 $13,209,382,882 $0 -$7,313,934,834 -$58,917,835,4592034 $5,878,939,290 $13,708,972,798 $0 -$7,830,033,508 -$66,747,868,9672035 $5,872,534,080 $14,228,432,867 $0 -$8,355,898,787 -$75,103,767,7542036 $5,876,342,534 $14,768,554,491 $0 -$8,892,211,957 -$83,995,979,7112037 $5,884,909,720 $15,330,160,627 $0 -$9,445,250,907 -$93,441,230,6182038 $5,898,161,942 $15,914,107,045 $0 -$10,015,945,103 -$103,457,175,7212039 $5,911,436,995 $16,521,283,637 $0 -$10,609,846,642 -$114,067,022,3632040 $5,924,301,110 $17,152,615,780 $0 -$11,228,314,670 -$125,295,337,033

TOTAL: $201,791,368,771 $327,086,705,804 $0 -$125,295,337,033 

Questions?Questions?

David EllisDavid EllisResearch ScientistResearch ScientistTexas Transportation InstituteTexas Transportation InstituteThe Texas A&M University The Texas A&M University SystemSystemCollege Station, Texas 77845College Station, Texas 77845

979.845.6165979.845.6165d-ellis@tamu.edud-ellis@tamu.edu

Other Slides

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

Population RegisteredVehicles

Vehicle MilesTraveled

State-MaintainedLane Miles

Annu

al P

erce

nt In

crea

se P

er Y

ear

Annual Percent Increase in Texas: 1990 to 2007Annual Percent Increase in Texas: 1990 to 2007

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

$0.14

$0.16

$0.18

$0.20

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Effe

ctiv

e Ta

x R

ate

(Cen

ts p

er G

allo

n)

Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted for Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted for InflationInflation

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

$0.14

$0.16

$0.18

$0.20

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Effe

ctiv

e Fu

el T

ax R

ate

(Cen

ts p

er G

allo

n)

Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted by Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted by H.C.I.H.C.I.

15.0

15.5

16.0

16.5

17.0

17.5

18.0

18.5

19.0

19.5

20.0

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Mile

s Pe

r Gal

lon

Average Fleetwide Fuel Efficiency in Average Fleetwide Fuel Efficiency in Texas:Texas:

Gasoline Powered VehiclesGasoline Powered Vehicles

$105

$110

$115

$120

$125

$130

$135

$140

$145

$150

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Ann

ual F

uel T

ax P

aid

Fuel Efficiency Adjusted Fuel Tax PaidFuel Efficiency Adjusted Fuel Tax Paid(assuming 12,000 annual miles)(assuming 12,000 annual miles)

$0.0

$0.5

$1.0

$1.5

$2.0

$2.5

$3.0

$3.5

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

2015

2018

2021

2024

2027

2029

Reve

nue

in B

illio

ns o

f $Gasoline Tax Revenues Diesel Tax Revenues

Historical and Projected Fuel Tax Revenues Historical and Projected Fuel Tax Revenues TexasTexas

Over the next 20 years:

• VMT is projected to increase 33 percent

• Fuel tax revenue is projected to decrease 23 percent

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

1936

1939

1942

1945

1948

1951

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

WW IIRationing

Nominal Price: +33%Real Price: +20%

VMT: -2.5%

Nominal Price: +46%Real Price: +38%

VMT: -3.3%

Nominal Price: +36%Real Price: +23%

VMT: -1.0%

Vehicle Miles Traveled in the United States (in millions): 1936 through 2009Vehicle Miles Traveled in the United States (in millions): 1936 through 2009(Source: Federal Highway Administration)(Source: Federal Highway Administration)

0.200.25

0.610.67 0.67

0.84 0.850.81

0.78

0.31

0.23

0.51

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

Janu

ary

Febr

uary

Mar

ch

Apr

il

May

June

July

Aug

ust

Sept

embe

r

Oct

ober

Nov

embe

r

Dec

embe

r

R-S

quar

ed V

alue

R-Squared Value - Price of Gasoline and Per Capita Consumption by Month

August 1997 through July 2009

-60.0%

-40.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

-60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0%

Percent Change in Consumption Per Capita

Perc

ent C

hang

e in

Pric

eConsumption UpPrice Up

Consumption UpPrice Down

Consumption DownPrice Down

Consumption DownPrice Up

Year-Over-Year Percent Change in Consumption of Gasoline Per Capita Versus Year-Over-Year in Percent Change in Gasoline

Price in Texas(All Months - August 1997 through July 2009)

top related