Top Banner
Quantifying Transportation Quantifying Transportation Needs Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience The Texas Experience presented to presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Committee on Highway Finance Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas Phone: 979.845.6165 E-mail: [email protected]
48

Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Mar 13, 2016

Download

Documents

leila-maldonado

Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance. Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Quantifying Transportation NeedsQuantifying Transportation Needsand Assessing Revenue Options:and Assessing Revenue Options:

The Texas ExperienceThe Texas Experiencepresented topresented to

The Arkansas Blue Ribbon The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway FinanceCommittee on Highway Finance

Dr. David EllisResearch Scientist

Texas Transportation InstituteThe Texas A&M University System

College Station, Texas

Phone: 979.845.6165E-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Two EffortsTwo EffortsThe 2030 Committee to

Determine Transportation Needs and Recommend Investment Level

The TRENDS Model to Assess Revenue Alternatives

Page 3: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Desired Mobility Level

Analytical ProcessAnalytical Process

Investment Required

Current/Future

Revenue Stream

Current/Future

Expense Stream

Economic ImpactBenefit/Cost

TheTRENDSModel

The2030

Committee

Page 4: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

The 2030 Committee Needs The 2030 Committee Needs AssessmentAssessment

Page 5: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Needs Determination Needs Determination Process SummaryProcess SummaryTravel demand modelsPeak period speedsRegular delay and incident/irregular delayCalculate performance measuresIdentify road sections over congestion

thresholdEstimate road needed to accomplish

scenarioGroup by area type and functional classEstimate cost for area/functional class

additionsAdd interchange and right-of-way costs

Page 6: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Urban Mobility Analysis Urban Mobility Analysis OverviewOverview

Performance Measures• Peak and free-flow travel speed• Delay reductions from signal

coordination,• access mgmt, incident clearance,

ramp metering• Texas Congestion Index • Delay per “commuter” • Total delay and extra fuel costs

Page 7: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Types of BenefitsTypes of BenefitsDelay savings – compared to free-flowFuel savings – simple estimate (% of

delay)Reduced cost of goods and services

(productivity)Business Effects

◦Economic impact of construction◦Business profitability & job creation

Local tax revenue

Page 8: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Maintain Economic Competitiveness

Reduce Congestion

Current Funding Trend

Prevent Worsening Congestion

Inadequate Mobility Investment

MINIMUM

Delay Hours per Commuter in 2030

Mobility Investment and Congestion Mobility Investment and Congestion MitigationMitigation

Page 9: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Costs of Improvements and Costs of Improvements and CongestionCongestion

Page 10: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Total Investment Needed: 2010 to Total Investment Needed: 2010 to 20302030(in 2008 $)(in 2008 $)

2030 Need Area Investment Required

Pavements $ 89 Billion

Bridges $ 36 Billion

Urban Mobility $ 171 Billion

Rural Mobility and Safety Projects $ 17 Billion

TOTAL $ 313 Billion

Page 11: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

The Transportation The Transportation Revenue Estimator and Revenue Estimator and Needs Determination Needs Determination System (TRENDS) ModelSystem (TRENDS) Model

Page 12: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Dynamic and InteractiveDynamic and InteractiveAnalytical Planning ToolAnalytical Planning ToolWeb-basedMenu DrivenAllows User to Make Choices

Page 13: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

TRENDS Model ProcessTRENDS Model ProcessGallons of Fuel UsedPopulationRelationship of Fuel Used to

PopulationFuel EfficiencyFuel Used/Fuel Efficiency = VMTFuture Population yields Future

Fuel Use and VMT

Page 14: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

The Relationship Between The Relationship Between Gasoline Used and Gasoline Used and PopulationPopulation

Page 15: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Relationship Between Diesel Relationship Between Diesel Fuel and PopulationFuel and Population

Page 16: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

68 Variables68 VariablesTaxesFeesMaintenance LevelsFuel EconomyInflation RatePopulation

Page 17: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Report FormatsReport FormatsTabular FormRevenue and Expense StatementCharts

Page 18: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Backcasting Using the TRENDS Model

Absolute Mean Value of Error: 1992-2008

Gasoline Revenues: 2.19 % Diesel Revenues:2.68 % Registration Fee Revenues:

2.55 %

Page 19: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 20: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 21: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 22: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 23: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 24: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 25: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 26: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 27: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 28: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 29: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 30: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 31: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Alternative Fuel Economy Alternative Fuel Economy ScenariosScenarios

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

2028

2030

2032

2034

2036

2038

2040

Mile

s Pe

r G

allo

n"Low" Scenario" "Average" Scenario "High" Scenario

Page 32: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 33: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 34: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System
Page 35: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

PROJECTED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 

Total RevenuesMaintenance and

Operating ExpendituresNew Capacity Expenditures

Annual Balance of Funds Cumulative Balance

 Fiscal Year

2010 $8,758,866,295 $5,719,566,241 $0 $3,039,300,054 $3,039,300,0542011 $8,666,176,935 $6,199,735,250 $0 $2,466,441,685 $5,505,741,7392012 $7,331,042,188 $6,565,611,249 $0 $765,430,938 $6,271,172,6772013 $7,394,794,904 $6,662,663,504 $0 $732,131,400 $7,003,304,0772014 $7,455,331,884 $6,788,181,923 $0 $667,149,961 $7,670,454,0382015 $6,509,064,724 $7,131,845,147 $0 -$622,780,423 $7,047,673,6142016 $6,558,673,619 $6,951,339,715 $0 -$392,666,095 $6,655,007,5192017 $6,582,076,715 $7,063,421,961 $0 -$481,345,245 $6,173,662,2742018 $6,600,459,874 $7,224,842,844 $0 -$624,382,971 $5,549,279,3032019 $6,611,094,702 $7,393,445,846 $0 -$782,351,144 $4,766,928,1592020 $6,612,209,268 $8,711,630,578 $0 -$2,099,421,310 $2,667,506,8492021 $6,603,964,888 $8,999,905,699 $0 -$2,395,940,811 $271,566,0372022 $6,584,919,464 $9,297,115,473 $0 -$2,712,196,009 -$2,440,629,9722023 $6,553,222,123 $9,636,769,543 $0 -$3,083,547,420 -$5,524,177,3912024 $6,506,690,326 $9,952,306,197 $0 -$3,445,615,871 -$8,969,793,2632025 $6,442,514,351 $10,319,739,231 $0 -$3,877,224,880 -$12,847,018,1422026 $6,371,518,932 $10,669,747,152 $0 -$4,298,228,221 -$17,145,246,3632027 $6,293,285,063 $10,933,478,274 $0 -$4,640,193,212 -$21,785,439,5752028 $6,207,281,506 $11,223,846,556 $0 -$5,016,565,050 -$26,802,004,6252029 $6,113,058,615 $11,634,934,560 $0 -$5,521,875,946 -$32,323,880,5702030 $6,010,008,576 $12,062,368,227 $0 -$6,052,359,651 -$38,376,240,2212031 $5,960,528,848 $12,381,798,447 $0 -$6,421,269,599 -$44,797,509,8202032 $5,922,511,254 $12,728,902,058 $0 -$6,806,390,804 -$51,603,900,6252033 $5,895,448,048 $13,209,382,882 $0 -$7,313,934,834 -$58,917,835,4592034 $5,878,939,290 $13,708,972,798 $0 -$7,830,033,508 -$66,747,868,9672035 $5,872,534,080 $14,228,432,867 $0 -$8,355,898,787 -$75,103,767,7542036 $5,876,342,534 $14,768,554,491 $0 -$8,892,211,957 -$83,995,979,7112037 $5,884,909,720 $15,330,160,627 $0 -$9,445,250,907 -$93,441,230,6182038 $5,898,161,942 $15,914,107,045 $0 -$10,015,945,103 -$103,457,175,7212039 $5,911,436,995 $16,521,283,637 $0 -$10,609,846,642 -$114,067,022,3632040 $5,924,301,110 $17,152,615,780 $0 -$11,228,314,670 -$125,295,337,033

TOTAL: $201,791,368,771 $327,086,705,804 $0 -$125,295,337,033 

Page 36: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Questions?Questions?

Page 37: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

David EllisDavid EllisResearch ScientistResearch ScientistTexas Transportation InstituteTexas Transportation InstituteThe Texas A&M University The Texas A&M University SystemSystemCollege Station, Texas 77845College Station, Texas 77845

[email protected]@tamu.edu

Page 38: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Other Slides

Page 39: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

Population RegisteredVehicles

Vehicle MilesTraveled

State-MaintainedLane Miles

Annu

al P

erce

nt In

crea

se P

er Y

ear

Annual Percent Increase in Texas: 1990 to 2007Annual Percent Increase in Texas: 1990 to 2007

Page 40: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

$0.14

$0.16

$0.18

$0.20

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Effe

ctiv

e Ta

x R

ate

(Cen

ts p

er G

allo

n)

Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted for Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted for InflationInflation

Page 41: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

$0.14

$0.16

$0.18

$0.20

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Effe

ctiv

e Fu

el T

ax R

ate

(Cen

ts p

er G

allo

n)

Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted by Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted by H.C.I.H.C.I.

Page 42: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

15.0

15.5

16.0

16.5

17.0

17.5

18.0

18.5

19.0

19.5

20.0

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Mile

s Pe

r Gal

lon

Average Fleetwide Fuel Efficiency in Average Fleetwide Fuel Efficiency in Texas:Texas:

Gasoline Powered VehiclesGasoline Powered Vehicles

Page 43: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

$105

$110

$115

$120

$125

$130

$135

$140

$145

$150

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Ann

ual F

uel T

ax P

aid

Fuel Efficiency Adjusted Fuel Tax PaidFuel Efficiency Adjusted Fuel Tax Paid(assuming 12,000 annual miles)(assuming 12,000 annual miles)

Page 44: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

$0.0

$0.5

$1.0

$1.5

$2.0

$2.5

$3.0

$3.5

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

2015

2018

2021

2024

2027

2029

Reve

nue

in B

illio

ns o

f $Gasoline Tax Revenues Diesel Tax Revenues

Historical and Projected Fuel Tax Revenues Historical and Projected Fuel Tax Revenues TexasTexas

Page 45: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Over the next 20 years:

• VMT is projected to increase 33 percent

• Fuel tax revenue is projected to decrease 23 percent

Page 46: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

1936

1939

1942

1945

1948

1951

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

WW IIRationing

Nominal Price: +33%Real Price: +20%

VMT: -2.5%

Nominal Price: +46%Real Price: +38%

VMT: -3.3%

Nominal Price: +36%Real Price: +23%

VMT: -1.0%

Vehicle Miles Traveled in the United States (in millions): 1936 through 2009Vehicle Miles Traveled in the United States (in millions): 1936 through 2009(Source: Federal Highway Administration)(Source: Federal Highway Administration)

Page 47: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

0.200.25

0.610.67 0.67

0.84 0.850.81

0.78

0.31

0.23

0.51

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

Janu

ary

Febr

uary

Mar

ch

Apr

il

May

June

July

Aug

ust

Sept

embe

r

Oct

ober

Nov

embe

r

Dec

embe

r

R-S

quar

ed V

alue

R-Squared Value - Price of Gasoline and Per Capita Consumption by Month

August 1997 through July 2009

Page 48: Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

-60.0%

-40.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

-60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0%

Percent Change in Consumption Per Capita

Perc

ent C

hang

e in

Pric

eConsumption UpPrice Up

Consumption UpPrice Down

Consumption DownPrice Down

Consumption DownPrice Up

Year-Over-Year Percent Change in Consumption of Gasoline Per Capita Versus Year-Over-Year in Percent Change in Gasoline

Price in Texas(All Months - August 1997 through July 2009)