Desk Share Concept

COPIER

CO

PIER

COPI

ER

COPI

ER

Existing Plan

180 seats, 7.2 sqm NIA per seat180 Heads3% support space

average 45%satisfaction

overall “not good”

“opportunity” and “risk”

Space Utilisation………..

68% utilisation rate

2/3 occupied or 1/3 empty20% seats semi-occupied

23% unoccupied seatfor 3 hours or more

Workshops…………..

telephonesIT infrastructurestorage

“Giving people time to adjust”

People took an active roll in the idea’s for the new space…….

Brand - Who are we ?

It’s about people…...

Objectives…………….

Functional Space

reinforce corporate brandNot one size

fits all

space that evolves

Collaborative

cost effective

flexible

creativeefficient

A space for the information worker

understanding

Measurement objectives ……….

user satisfaction

post move studies

change management

brand in the workplace

productive state

space utilisation

Desk Share Concept……...

100 % er’s

mobile workers

Desk Share = communityHot Desking = don’t belong

Desk Share Concept………...

Departments flow into each others areas

Desk Share = communityHot Desking = don’t belong

CO

PIER

CO

PIER

New Layout - Desk Share Concept………...

Worked around the groups…….

Desk Share Concept……………….

Desk Share Concept……...

Desk Share Concept………….

Desk Share Concept…………..

Desk Share Concept…………….

Desk Share Concept…………….

Move from average 45% to 59% satisfaction (14% point benefit)

Satisfaction by functionality and effectiveness ………….

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

variety of workspaces fordifferent kinds of work

space for group work

overall office layout / spaceconfiguration

general style of the office

ease of access to people Ineed to interact with

office atmosphere

post pre

Productive state and satisfaction analysis ……………..

Low

High

Productive state……………..

Results……………..

180 seats 7.2sqm/seat180 heads 7.2 sqm/head3% support space

14% point improvement in satisfaction

142 seats, 9.2 sqm/seat220 heads 5.9 sqm/head24% support space

Existing New

5% point improvement in mgr’s and teams productive state

4% negative impact to PA’s and secretaries