Transcript
Finance 402
1
Recent Mergers Reasons for Mergers Types of Mergers Merger Analysis Accounting for Mergers Role of Investment Bankers Corporate Alliances, Leveraged Buyouts,
and Divestitures Holding Companies
CHAPTER 25Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and
Holding Companies
Finance 402
2
Mergers Announced in 2005Mergers Announced in 2005 America West and US Airways
– $1.5 billion - Announced May 19, 2005 Lenovo Goup and IBM PC Division
– $1.25 billion – Announced April 20th, 2005 Verizon and MCI
– $7.6 billion – Announced March 29, 2005 Proctor and Gamble and Gillette
– $57 billion – Announced March 28, 2005 IAC/Interactive and Ask Jeeves
– $1.9 billion – Announced March 21, 2005 Met Life and Travelers Group
– $11.5 billion – Announced January 31, 2005
Finance 402
3
Mergers Announced in 2004Mergers Announced in 2004
K Mart and Sears Roebuck– $11 billion – Announced November 17, 2004
Wachovia and South Trust– $14.3 billion – Announced June 21, 2004
May Company and Marshall Field– Purchased from Target (an Acquisition)– $3.24 billion – Announced June 9, 2004
Wells Fargo and Strong Capital Management– $400 million (estimated) – Announced May 27, 2004
Marsh & McLennan – Kroll, Inc– $1.96 billion – Announced May 18, 2004
Finance 402
4
Mergers Announced in 2004 - Mergers Announced in 2004 - ContinuedContinued
Sun Trust and National Commerce Financial– $6.98 billion – Announced May 9, 2004
Cingular Wireless and AT & T Wireless– $47 billion – Announced February 17, 2004
J P Morgan Chase and Bank One
Finance 402
5
Mergers Announced in 2003Mergers Announced in 2003 St. Paul Companies and Travelers Property Casualty
– $16.5 billion– Announced November 17th, 2003
Bank of America and Fleet Boston– $48 billion– Announced October 27, 2003
Manulife and John Hancock Financial Services– $10.4 billion– Announced November 4, 2003
Anthem and Wellpoint– $16.4 billion– Announced October 27, 2003
Finance 402
6
Mergers Announced in 2003 -ContinuedMergers Announced in 2003 -Continued R.J. Reynolds and British American Tobacco PLC
– $3 billion for U.S. units of British American Tobacco– Announced October 27, 2003
Oracle and PeopleSoft– $5.1 billion hostile takeover – updated in 2004 to $9.2 billion– First Announced June 9, 2003
Manufactured Home and Chateau Communities– $1.8 billion– May, 2003
Berkshire Hathaway and Clayton Homes– $1.7 billion– April, 2003
Viacom and Comedy Central– $1.2 billion– April, 2003
Finance 402
7
Five Largest Completed Five Largest Completed MergersMergers
(as of January 2002)(as of January 2002)VALUE
BUYER TARGET (Billion)
Vodafone AirTouch Mannesman $161
Pfizer Warner-Lambert 116
America Online Time Warner 106
Exxon Mobil 81
Glaxo Wellcome SmithKline Beecham 74
Finance 402
8
Foreign Acquisitions of U.S. Foreign Acquisitions of U.S. FirmsFirms
Manulife and John Hancock Financial Services Bridgestone and Firestone Daimler Benz and Chrysler HSBC Holdings and Household International British Petroleum and Amoco, Sohio, and Atlantic Richfield Ahold and Giant Food stores, Harris Teeter, and Price
Chopper Michelin and B.F. Goodrich Grand Metropolitan and Pillsbury Thomson and G.E. Small Appliances
Finance 402
9
Foreign Acquisitions and U.S. Foreign Acquisitions and U.S. Firms - ContinuedFirms - Continued
Credit Suisse and First Boston Zurich Insurance and Scudder, Stevens Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and UnionBanCal Toronto Dominion Bank and Waterhouse Securities Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank and Marine Midland Matushita and MCA Broken Hill Proprietary and Utah International (from G. E.) UBS and Paine Webber Bertelsmann and Napster
Finance 402
10
Synergy: Value of the combined firm exceeds the sum of the values of the firms taken separately. Arises from:– Operating economies– Financial economies– Differential management efficiency– Tax Effects (possibly use accumulated losses)
(More...)
Which of the reasons that have beenproposed as justification for mergers
are economically justifiable?
Finance 402
11
– Increased Market Power: Due to reduced competition
Corporate FocusWorld Wide Competition (Globalization)Acquire Technological Skills
Finance 402
12
Break-up ValueBreak-up Value
Break-up value: A company’s assets would be more valuable if sold to and then operated by some other company or spun off.
Finance 402
13
Diversification– Stockholders can achieve diversification at
lower cost than firms– Transfers wealth from stockholders to debt
holders– No synergistic effects
Purchase of assets at below replacement cost
(more)
What are some questionablereasons for mergers?
Finance 402
14
What are some questionableWhat are some questionablereasons for mergers? - reasons for mergers? -
continuedcontinuedRetention of control
– Acquire other firms to increase size, thus making it more difficult to be acquired
Managers’ personal incentives
Finance 402
15
Types of MergersTypes of Mergers
Horizontal– First Union and Wachovia
Vertical– DuPont and Conoco
Congeric - Related Enterprises– Duke Power and Pan Energy
Conglomerate– Mobil Oil and Montgomery Ward
Finance 402
16
Friendly merger: – Management of one firm (acquirer)
agrees to buy another firm (target).– This merger is supported by the
management of both firms.
Differentiate betweenhostile and friendly mergers
Finance 402
17
Hostile merger:– Target firm’s management resists the
merger.– Acquirer must go directly to the target
firm’s stockholders, try to get 51% to tender their shares.
– Often, mergers that start out hostile end up as friendly, when the offer price is raised.
– Tender offer– Proxy fights
Finance 402
18
Merger Regulation - The Merger Regulation - The Williams Act of 1968Williams Act of 1968
Acquirers must disclose their current holdings within 10 days of amassing 5% of company’s stock
Acquirers must disclose source of funds to be used in the acquisition
Target firm’s SH must be allowed at least 20 days to tender their shares
If the acquiring firm increases the offer price, all SH who tendered must receive the higher price.
Finance 402
19
M & A “Terms”M & A “Terms”
Poison PutPoison PillWhite KnightShark RepellentGreenmailGolden ParachuteSuper MajorityESOP
Finance 402
20
Reason for Adjusted Present Reason for Adjusted Present Value (APV) Merger AnalysisValue (APV) Merger Analysis
Often in a merger the capital structure changes rapidly over the first several years.
This causes the WACC to change from year to year.
It is hard to incorporate year-to-year changes in WACC in the corporate valuation model.
Finance 402
21
The Adjusted Present Value The Adjusted Present Value (APV) Model(APV) Model
Value of firm if it had no debt
+ Value of tax savings due to debt
= Value of operations
First term is called the unlevered value of the firm. The second term is called the value of the interest tax shield.
(More...)
Finance 402
22
APV ModelAPV Model
Unlevered value of firm = PV of FCFs discounted at unlevered cost of equity, rsU.
Value of interest tax shield = PV of interest tax savings at unlevered cost of equity. Interest tax savings =
Interest(tax rate) = TSt .
Finance 402
23
Note to APVNote to APV
APV is the best model to use when the capital structure is changing.
The Corporate Valuation model is easier than APV to use when the capital structure is constant—such as at the horizon.
Finance 402
24
Steps in APV ValuationSteps in APV Valuation
1. Project FCFt , TSt , horizon growth rate, and horizon capital structure.
2. Calculate the unlevered cost of equity, rsU.3. Calculate WACC at horizon.4. Calculate horizon value using constant
growth corporate valuation model.
5. Calculate Vops as PV of FCFt, TSt and horizon value, all discounted at rsU.
Finance 402
25
Net sales $60.0 $90.0 $112.5 $127.5Cost of goods sold (60%) 36.0 54.0 67.5 76.5Selling/admin. expenses 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0EBIT 19.5 30.0 37.5 42.0Taxes on EBIT (40%) 7.8 12.0 15.0 16.8NOPAT 11.7 18.0 22.5 25.2Net Retentions 0.0 7.5 6.0 4.5Free Cash Flow 11.7 10.5 16.5 20.7
APV Valuation Analysis (In Millions)
2004 2005 2006 2007 Free Cash Flows after Merger Occurs
From Mini Case in Chapter 25
Finance 402
26
Interest Tax Savings after Interest Tax Savings after MergerMerger
Interest expense 5.0 6.5 6.5 7.0
Interest tax savings 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.8
Interest tax savings are calculated as
interest(T). T = 40%
2004 2005 2006 2007
Finance 402
27
What are the net retentions?What are the net retentions?
Recall that firms must reinvest in order to replace worn out assets and grow.
Net retentions = gross retentions – depreciation.
Finance 402
28
After acquisition, the free cash flows belong to the remaining debtholders in the target and the various investors in the acquiring firm: their debtholders, stockholders, and others such as preferred stockholders.
These cash flows can be redeployed within the acquiring firm.
Conceptually, what is the appropriate discount rate to apply to the
target’s cash flows?
(More...)
Finance 402
29
Free cash flow is the cash flow that would occur if the firm had no debt, so it should be discounted at the unlevered cost of equity.
The interest tax shields are also discounted at the unlevered cost of equity.
Finance 402
30
Note: Comparison of APV with Note: Comparison of APV with Corporate Valuation ModelCorporate Valuation Model
APV discounts FCF at rsU and adds in present value of the tax shields—the value of the tax savings are incorporated explicitly.
Corp. Val. Model discounts FCF at WACC, which has a (1-T) factor to account for the value of the tax shield.
Both models give same answer IF carefully done. BUT it is difficult to apply the Corp. Val. Model when WACC is changing from year-to-year.
Finance 402
31
Discount rate for Horizon Discount rate for Horizon ValueValue
At the horizon the capital structure is constant, so the corporate valuation model can be used, so discount FCFs at WACC.
Finance 402
32
Discount Rate Calculations
rsL = rRF + (rM - rRF)bTarget
= 7% + (4%)1.3 = 12.2%
rsU = wdrd + wsrsL
= 0.20(9%) + 0.80(12.2%) = 11.56%
WACC = wd(1-T)rd + wsrsL
=0.20(0.60)9% + 0.80(12.2%)
= 10.84%
Finance 402
33
Horizon value =
=
= $453.3 million.
Horizon, or Continuing, Value
g WACC
g))(1(FCF2007
06.01084.0
)06.1(7.20$
Finance 402
34
What Is the value of the Target What Is the value of the Target Firm’s operations to the Firm’s operations to the
Acquiring Firm? (In Millions)Acquiring Firm? (In Millions) 2004 2005 2006 2007
Free Cash Flow $11.7 $10.5 $16.5 $ 20.7Horizon value 453.3Interest tax shield 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.8Total $13.7 $13.1 $19.1 $476.8
VOps = + + +
= $344.4 million.
$13.7 (1.1156)1
$13.1 (1.1156)2
$19.1 (1.1156)3
$476.8 (1.1156)4
Finance 402
35
What is the value of the What is the value of the Target’s equity?Target’s equity?
The Target has $55 million in debt.Vops – debt = equity344.4 million – 55 million = $289.4 million
= equity value of target to the acquirer.
Finance 402
36
No. The cash flow estimates would be different, both due to forecasting inaccuracies and to differential synergies.
Further, a different beta estimate, financing mix, or tax rate would change the discount rate.
Additionally, a different estimating procedure could result in a different discount rate.
Would another potential acquirer obtain the same value?
Finance 402
37
Estimate of target’s value = $289.4 million
Target’s current value = $220.0million
Merger premium = $ 69.4 million
Presumably, the target’s value is increased by $69.4 million due to merger synergies, although realizing such synergies has been problematic in many mergers.
(More...)
Finance 402
38
Assume the target company has 20 million shares outstanding. The stock last traded at $11 per share,
which reflects the target’s value on a stand-alone basis. How much should
the acquiring firm offer?
Finance 402
39
The offer could range from $11 to $289.4/20 = $14.47 per share.
At $11, all merger benefits would go to the acquiring firm’s shareholders.
At $14.47, all value added would go to the target firm’s shareholders.
The graph on the next slide summarizes the situation.
Finance 402
40
0 5 10 15 20
Change in Shareholders’
Wealth
Acquirer Target
Bargaining Range = Synergy
Price Paid for Target
$11.00 $14.47
Finance 402
41
Points About GraphPoints About Graph
Nothing magic about crossover price.
Actual price would be determined by bargaining. Higher if target is in better bargaining position, lower if acquirer is.
If target is good fit for many acquirers, other firms will come in, price will be bid up. If not, could be close to $11. Most of the time the target’s stockholders receive the vast majority of the benefits.
(More...)
Finance 402
42
Acquirer might want to make high “preemptive” bid to ward off other bidders, or low bid and then plan to go up. Strategy is important.
Do target’s managers have 51% of stock and want to remain in control?
What kind of personal deal will target’s managers get?
What if the Acquirer intended to What if the Acquirer intended to increase the debt level in the increase the debt level in the Target to 40% with an interest Target to 40% with an interest
rate of 10%?rate of 10%?Free cash flows wouldn’t change
Assume interest payments in short term won’t change (if they did, it is easy to incorporate that difference)
Long term rsLwill change, so horizon WACC will change, so horizon value will change.
Finance 402
44
New WACC CalculationNew WACC Calculation
New rsL = rsU + (rsU – rd)(D/S)= 11.56% + (11.56% - 10%)(0.4/0.6) = 12.60%
New WACC = wdrd(1-T) + wsrsL
= 0.4(10%)(1-0.4) + 0.6(12.6%)= 9.96%
All data are from the mini case.
Finance 402
45
New Horizon Value New Horizon Value CalculationCalculation
Horizon value =
=
= $554.1 million.
g WACC
g))(1(FCF2007
06.00996.0
)06.1(7.20$
Finance 402
46
New VNew Vopsops and V and Vequityequity
2004 2005 2006 2007 Free Cash Flow $11.7 $10.5 $16.5 $ 20.7Horizon value 554.1Interest tax shield 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.8Total $13.7 $13.1 $19.1 $577.6
VOps = + + +
= $409.5 million.
$13.7 (1.1156)1
$13.1 (1.1156)2
$19.1 (1.1156)3
$577.6 (1.1156)4
Finance 402
47
New Equity ValueNew Equity Value
$409.5 million - 55 million = $354.5 million
This is $65.1 million, or $3.26 per share more than if the horizon capital structure is 20% debt.
The added value is the value of the additional tax shield from the increased debt.
Finance 402
48
Pooling of interests is GONE. Only purchase accounting may be used now.
What method is used to account for for mergers?
(More...)
Finance 402
49
Purchase:
– The assets of the acquired firm are “written up” to reflect purchase price if it is greater than the net asset value.
– Goodwill is often created, which appears as an asset on the balance sheet.
– Common equity account is increased to balance assets and claims.
Finance 402
50
Goodwill AmortizationGoodwill AmortizationGoodwill is NO LONGER amortized over
time for shareholder reporting.Goodwill is subject to an annual “impairment
test.” If its fair market value has declined, then goodwill is reduced. Otherwise it is not.– AOL Time Warner wrote down $54 billion of
goodwill in 2002 because of “impairment test.”Goodwill is still amortized for Federal Tax
purposes. Can amortize goodwill over 15 years using straight-line method.
Finance 402
51
Corporate CultureCorporate Culture
Should also consider factors other than cash flows, such as Corporate Culture, marketing philosophies, and personnel policies.
Merger talks often collapse because of “social issues” and “chemistry.”– Who will run the combined company?– What will be the name of the combined firm?– Where will the headquarters be located?
Finance 402
52
Analysis for a “True Analysis for a “True Consolidation” - Merger of EqualsConsolidation” - Merger of Equals Steps:
– Develop pro forma financial statements for the consolidated corporation. Determine the projected consolidated free cash flows available to stockholders.
– Estimate the new company’s unlevered cost of equity, and use that rate to discount the free cash flows and interest tax shields of the consolidated company.
– Decide how to allocate the new company’s stock between the two sets of old stockholders.
Finance 402
53
Identify targets Help arrange mergers
– No “parked stock” Develop defensive tactics Value target companies Help finance mergers Invest in stocks of potential merger candidates Arbitrage operations Trend is away from using investment bankers,
especially for smaller deals
What merger-related activities are undertaken by investment bankers?
Finance 402
54
According to empirical evidence, acquisitions do create value as a result of economies of scale, other synergies, and/or better management.
Shareholders of target firms reap most of the benefits, that is, the final price is close to full value.– Target management can always say no.
– Competing bidders often push up prices.
Do mergers really create value?
Finance 402
55
– Studies show stock price of target firms increase by 30% in hostile tender offers, while in friendly tender offers, the increase is 20%.
Finance 402
56
Merger FailuresMerger Failures
61% of buyers destroyed their own shareholder’s wealth
In April 2002, AOL Time Warner took a $54 billion charge
17 out of the 21 “winners” in the merger spring of 1998 were a “bust” for investors who owned the shares
Finance 402
57
Reasons for Merger FailureReasons for Merger Failure
Overpay by a sizeable premiumOverestimate likely cost savings and
synergiesDelay over integrating operations after
mergerEmphasis on cost-cutting, damaging the
business and losing key personnel
Finance 402
58
Other Failure ResultsOther Failure Results TYCO
– Paid $11.3 billion for CIT in June 2001 and completed an IPO for $4.6 billion in July 2002 (loss of 6.7 billion)
WorldCom AT&T Vivendi Cisco Systems Conseco First Union Corp
Finance 402
59
Joint VentureAccess to new markets and technologiesMultiple parties share risks and expensesRivals can often work together
harmoniouslyAntitrust laws can shelter cooperative
R&D activities
Reasons why alliances can make more sense than acquisitions
Finance 402
60
Leveraged Buyout (LBO)Leveraged Buyout (LBO)
A small group of equity investors, usually including current management, acquires a firm in a transaction financed largely by borrowing. They “go private.” Typically buy publicly held stock. Can be a subsidiary of a public company.
Purchase often financed mostly with debt.After operating privately for a number of years,
investors might take the firm public to “cash out.” Very prevalent during the 1980s
Finance 402
61
Leverage Buyout (LBO) ContinuedLeverage Buyout (LBO) Continued Between January 2002 and November 6, 2002, LBOs
were up 50% vs. the same period the previous year to $20 billion. In the third quarter of 2002, LBOs accounted for almost 10% of all mergers & acquisitions, their largest share since 1989.
Nov. 19, 2002 – Northrop Grumman Corp. sold TRW Automotive Business to Blackstone for $4.73 Billion
April, 2003 – Investor Group purchased Aladdin Resort & Casino for $500 million
Nov. 17, 2003 – DuPont sold its Invista textiles unit to Koch Industries for $4.4 billion
Finance 402
62
Advantages:– Administrative cost savings– Increased managerial incentives– Increased managerial flexibility– Increased shareholder participation
Disadvantages:– Limited access to equity capital– No way to capture return on investment
How to exit an LBO– Go Public– Sell to another company– Another LBO
What are are the advantages and disadvantages of going private?
Finance 402
63
Types of DivestituresTypes of DivestituresSale of an entire subsidiary to another firm
Target and Marshall Field
Spin-Off Spinning off a corporate subsidiary by giving stock to existing
shareholders AT&T and Lucent Technologies
Carve Out A minority interest in a corporate subsidiary is sold to new
shareholders, so the parent gains new equity financing yet retains control
Philip Morris and Kraft
Outright liquidation of assets Woolworth
Finance 402
64
Subsidiary worth more to buyer than when operated by current owner.
To settle antitrust issues.Subsidiary’s value increased if it operates
independently.To change strategic direction.To shed money losers.To get needed cash when distressed.
What motivates firms to divest assets?
Finance 402
65
Divestitures vs. AcquisitionsDivestitures vs. AcquisitionsNot the “opposite side of a coin” of an acquisitionLike selling a house, one purchaser at a timeHave to decide what it is worth to someone elseTypically an admission of failureHurts the Balance Sheet and benefits the Income
StatementRisks and Returns are different
Finance 402
66
A holding company is a corporation formed for the sole purpose of owning the stocks of other companies.
In a typical holding company, the subsidiary companies issue their own debt, but their equity is held by the holding company, which, in turn, sells stock to individual investors.
What are holding companies?
Finance 402
67
Holding Companies - Holding Companies - Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages
Advantages– Control with
fractional ownership
– Isolation of risks (but often the parent is still responsible)
Disadvantages– Partial Multiple
Taxation– Ease of enforced
dissolution
Finance 402
68
ConclusionConclusion
Merger Trends Reasons for Mergers Types of Mergers Merger Analysis Accounting for Mergers Leveraged Buyouts Divestitures Holding Companies
top related