1 Crosslinguistic semantics of coordinated-wh interrogatives Neal Whitman nwhitman@ameritech.net COULD, May 12, 2007.

Post on 28-Mar-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

1

Crosslinguistic semantics of coordinated-wh interrogatives

Neal Whitmannwhitman@ameritech.net

COULD, May 12, 2007

2

Asking more than one thing at once

• Multiple wh

• Coordinated wh

• Coordination with sluicing

3

Multiple wh

Whom did you see when?

Who sat where?

4

Coordinated wh

When and where were you born?

Who or what did this?

5

Coordination with sluicing

Who did this, and why?

Where did he go, and when?

6

Wh complements

• Multiple wh: Who read what?

• Coordinated wh:

*Who and what read?

• Sluicing: *Who read, and what?

7

Complement and adjunct

• Multiple wh: Who saw Elvis where?

• Coordinated wh:

*Who and where saw Elvis?

• Sluicing: Who saw Elvis, and where?

8

Wh adjuncts

• Multiple wh:

(?)Where did you see him when?

• Coordinated wh:

Where and when did you see him?

• Sluicing :

Where did you see him, and when?

9

In short...

Multiple wh Coordinated wh Sluicing

Complements

(who / what)Yes No No

Mixed

(who / where)Yes No Yes

Adjuncts

(where / when)Yes/?? Yes Yes

10

Who read what?

• Single-pair answer:

Kim read The Da Vinci Code.

• Pair-list answer:

Kim read The Da Vinci Code;

Robin read Harry Potter;

and Sandy read Ethel the Aardvark Goes Quantity Surveying.

11

Who saw Elvis when?

#Who killed him when?

12

Where did you see him when?

#Where were you born when?

13

SP, PL, or both?

Multiple wh Coordinated wh Sluicing

Complements

(who / what)SP or PL No No

Mixed

(who / where)PL No SP or PL

Adjuncts

(where / when)PL SP or PL SP or PL

14

Hungarian

Multiple wh Coordinated wh

Complements PL SP

Mixed PL SP

Adjuncts PL SP

15

Russian

Multiple wh Coordinated wh

Complements PL SP

Mixed No SP

Adjuncts No SP

16

MWh, CWh, and Q-inference

SPanswers

SPanswers

PLanswers

MWh questions’ denotation, by Q-inference

CWh questions’ denotation

17

Languages surveyed• Chinese• Czech• English• (Estonian)• German• Greek• Hebrew• Hindi

• Hungarian• Japanese• Korean• Macedonian• Russian• Spanish• (Tagalog)• (Vietnamese)

18

24 questions

I. Who/what1. Who read what?

2. What did who read?

3. *Who and what read?

4. *What and who read?

19

24 questionsII. Who/where

1. Who saw her where?2. Where did who see her?3. *Who and where saw her?4. *Where and who saw her?5. Whom did she see where?6. Where did she see whom?7. * Whom and where did she see?8. *Where and whom did she see?

20

24 questions

III. Who/when1. Who saw her when?2. When did who see her?3. *Who and when saw her?4. *When and who saw her?5. Whom did she see when?6. When did she see whom?7. * Whom and when did she see?8. *When and whom did she see?

21

24 questions

IV. Who/when1. Where will she sing when?

2. When will she sing where?

3. Where and when will she sing?

4. When and where will she sing?

22

MWh/CWh overlapfor who/what

• Chinese III• Czech• Greek III• Hungarian

• Korean II• Macedonian II• Russian I, II, III• Spanish IV

23

MWh/CWh overlapfor who/where or who/when

• Chinese I, III• Czech• Greek II, III• Hungarian

• Korean II• Macedonian II• Russian II, III• Spanish IV

24

MWh/CWh overlapfor where/when

• Chinese I, III• Czech• English I• German I, II

• Greek III• Hebrew II• Hungarian• Korean II, III

25

Conclusion

• The hypothesis is not supported.• It may be true for some languages, but not

for all.• It needs fuller investigation with

coordination plus sluicing.• Some languages have SP/PL segregation,

but in the opposite direction.• In some languages, SP vs. PL is related to

interpretive superiority.

26

Acknowledgments

• Thank you to all the native speaker informants who have provided translations and syntactic and semantic judgments for this project:Ben Chudnovsky, Ilija Doneski, Anna Feldman, Calixto Gonzales, Betya Goykhman, Patti Green, Jirka Hana, Hyeon-Seok Kang, Soyoung Kang, Yusuke Kubota, Sun-Hee Lee, Ilse Lehiste, Dmitry Levinson, Anikó Lipták, Xiaofei Lu, Arantxa Martín-Lozano, Detmar Meurers, Bettina Migge, Mineharu "JJ" Nakayama, Roberto Orci, Panayiotis Pappas, Mike Puchovich, Hongqi Rouzer, Jane Rubin-Kurtzmann, Le Nhan Thanh, Giorgos Tserdanelis, Shravan Vasishth, Amanda Whitman, Ellen Whitman, Philip Whitman, and Niina Zhang.

27

The Coordinated-Wh Project

http://literalmindedlinguistics.com/Coord_Wh/home.html

28

ReferencesOnly those reference that were directly cited in this talk are listed here. For a fuller bibliography on coordinated-wh questions, see the website for the Coordinated-Wh Project.

Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (GURT ’84), ed. by D. Schiffrin, 11-43.

Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kazenin, Konstantin I. (ed.) 2002. On Coordination of WH-Phrases in Russian. Tuebingen.

Lipták, Anikó. 2003. Conjoined Questions in Hungarian. Multiple-Wh Fronting, ed. by Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes Grohmann. 141-60. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today. Philadelphia: Benjamins.

top related