Case3:10-cv-05542-EDL Document245 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17…

1. 2012 Patent UpdatePaul Conover for Medical Device Companies Curtis Huffmire Karen Vogel WeilThe recipient may only view this work. No other right or license is granted.…

Slide 1The John Marshall Law School 57th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference Post-Grant Procedures Michael P. Tierney Lead Administrative Patent Judge [email protected]…

Slide 1Technology Transfer Karen Rufus Sr. Licensing Officer Slide 2 Center for Technology Transfer Unofficial Mission Statement Increase Vanderbilts innovative capacity,…

Slide 1Recent Trends at the Patent Office: Strategies for Improving Your Outcome LeClairRyan 290 Linden Oaks, Suite 310 Rochester, NY 14625 US 585.270.2100 Edwin V. Merkel…

Slide 1Comparison between JP & US new patent systems - First (inventor) to file, exception to loss of novelty, and grace period - NOBUTAKA YOKOTA KYOWA PATENT AND LAW…

1. T he US Supreme Court in KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc raised the bar for establishing non-obviousness, arguably the most easily challenged patentabil- ity requirement…

Patent Trial and Appeal Board - Multi-Petition Challenges of a Patent Kerry Taylor, Ph.D. USD Patent Law Conference January 16, 2015 2 © 2015 Knobbe, Martens, Olson &…

Paper No. ___ Filed: February 27, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ___________________ COALITION…

Paper No. ___ Filed: September 3, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ___________________ COALITION…